ACC301 Sem1
ACC301 Sem1
ACC301 Sem1
ACC 301
Management Accounting 3
Consultation:
By appointment
PRE-REQUISITE (S)
QBM101
ACC201
SYNOPSIS
The subject is concerned with the current issues in management accounting. We will
build upon topics studied in ACC103 Management Accounting 1 and ACC201
Management Accounting 2 by introducing more advance and detail topics in the
framework of management accounting. The subject provides exposure to techniques and
methods used in management accounting application. We focus on evaluating existing
competitive strategies, developing new strategies, and monitoring and assessing progress
towards chosen strategies. The subject seeks to assist those involved in organizational
decision making by providing models which can be used in understanding, structuring
and resolving problems.
OBJECTIVES
Upon completion of this subject, students should be able to:
explain how management accounting helps organizations meet their strategic goals;
design financial models to match strategic and operation decisions;
explain and estimate the relationship between costs and cost drivers;
understand the issues of transfer pricing and divisional performance evaluation;
analyze strategic problems and access factors involved in decision making generally,
and strategic managerial decision making in particular;
demonstrate understanding of the process of strategic analysis and skill in using
relevant techniques to analyze firm and competitor strategies;
analyze customer-related activities and profitability of customers and products;
use linear programming to model decisions about the use of multiple scarce
resources;
TOPICS
TOPIC 1: Introduction: The management accounting framework
Development of Management Accounting
The Changing Business Environment
Primary Function Management Accounting System
Contemporary Management Accounting Practices
Total Quality Management, BPR and JIT Systems
Life Cycle Costing, Target Costing and Kaizen Costing
Activity Based Management and the Value Chain
Environmental Cost Management
Ethics in Management Accounting
PRESCRIBED TEXTS
Drury, C. (2015). Management and Cost Accounting, 9th Ed. United Kingdom:
Cengage Learning.
Fatseas, V. A., & Williams, J. F. (2009). Management Accounting Decisions. McGraw
Hill: Australia.
Horngren, C. T., Datar, S.M., & Rajan, M.V. (2013). Cost Accounting: A Managerial
Emphasis, 14th Ed. England: Pearson Education.
RECOMMENDED REFERENCES
Atkinson, A.A., Banker, R.D., Kaplan, R.S., Matsumara, E.M. & Young, S.M. (2013)
Management Accounting: Information for Decision Making and Strategy Execution 6th
edition) Pearson Education.
Hilton, R.W., Maher, M.W. and Selto, F.H. (2012) Cost Management: Strategies for
Business Decisions, International student edition. Boston: McGraw Hill.
Langfield-Smith, K., Thorne, H. & Hilton, R. (2014) Management Accounting:
Information for Managing and Creating Value, 6th ed.: McGraw-Hill.
Young, S. M. (2011). Readings in Management Accounting. 6th edition. Prentice Hall.
Week
Topics
References
Tutorial Questions
Drury Ch 1 & 21
1-4,1-6,1-9,21-8,21-13
Drury Ch 16
Drury Ch 22
Drury Ch 13 &i 14
FBW Ch10,
Drury Ch 25
10-9,10-11,10-12,
10-17, 10-20
HDR Ch 14
HDR Ch 13
Drury Ch 23
23-14,23-15,23-17,2319
Transfer Pricing
Drury Ch 20
HDR Ch 19
Network Analysis
FBW Ch 11
HDR Ch 23
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14 15
Final Examination
** Subject to change
Drury: Drury, C. (2012)
FBW: Fatseas, V.A., & Williams, J. F. (2009)
HDR: Horngren, C. T., Datar, S.M., & Rajan, M.V. (2013)
ASSESSMENT
There are 3 assessment items for this subject.
Assessment Items
Value
Due Date
1. Assignment
15%
11 April, 2016
15%
70%
*** To be confirmed
REQUIREMENTS
To gain a pass in this subject, students must:
Attempt ALL areas of assessment; and achieve a total result of 50% or better
overall.
** - Please check on the notice board and My Acel for the actual date. HELP
University reserves the right to make any changes to the above where appropriate.
ASSIGNMENT QUESTION
Written Assignment
Value: 15%
Due Date: 11 April, 2016
share, margin of safety, return on capital employed (ROCE), total quality costs and
consumer awards won.
(Note: Margin of safety has been defined as [actual sales units breakeven sales
units]/actual sales units.)
The board has asked you as a consultant to assess its current performance measurement
systems. They want a report which calculates the various indicators suggested above
and then assesses how the key performance indicators address issues in the external
environment. The report should assess the balance between planning and controlling
represented by the KPIs as they want to ensure that these match what they should be
doing at the strategic level in Lopten. Also, it should evaluate how the KPIs fit with the
CSFs which have been selected. The data given in Appendix 1 has been collated for
your use.
Finally, the board is considering two new marketing strategies going forward:
Plan A is to continue operations as at present allowing for 4% growth p.a. in volumes
of both Cheerful and Posh.
Plan B is to dramatically reduce the marketing spend on Cheerful and to reallocate
resources to focus the marketing on Posh. This is expected to lead to an anticipated
growth in volume of 15% p.a. for Posh and flat sales for Cheerful.
The target operating profit for the Beeland operation in two years time is set at $135m
and the board wants an evaluation of these strategies in meeting that target.
Appendix 1
Beeland operations information for the most recent financial year
Cheerful
$ per unit
90
60
40
45
20
Posh
$ per unit
120
80
50
45
30
Fixed costs
Administration costs
Distribution costs
Quality costs
Marketing costs
$m
18
16
6
80
$m
18
16
6
80
$m
36
32
12
160
Other data
Revenue
Capital employed
$m
448
326
$m
308
250
$m
756
576
Units
933
112
Units
133
044
Units
1066
156
Variable costs
Materials
Labour
Overheads
Distribution costs
Quality costs
10
Total
Notes:
1. Cheerful has won one best buy award from the Beeland Consumer Association.
2. Posh has won four best buy awards from the Beeland Consumer Association.
3. The allocations of fixed costs are based on a recent activity-based costing exercise
and are considered to be valid.
Required:
Write a report to the board of Lopten which:
(i) calculates the key performance indicators (KPIs) suggested by the board for
the assessment of performance of the Beeland operations;
(12 marks)
(ii) uses PEST analysis to identify issues in the companys external environment
and then evaluates the effectiveness of the suggested KPIs in addressing these
issues;
(12 marks)
(iii) takes each critical success factor (CSF) in turn and evaluates how the
suggested KPIs fit to the CSFs given;
(10 marks)
(iv) assesses the extent to which the suggested KPIs would be suitable for use in
planning rather than controlling;
(6 marks)
(v) evaluates whether the two proposed marketing strategies result in a
performance gap.
(10 marks)
11
housing components division. If the board agrees to this proposal, then the housing
components division will be treated as a cost centre only, charging its total production
cost to the assembly division. The electrical components and assembly divisions will
remain as profit centres.
The FD needs to understand the impact of this proposed new divisional structure on
divisional performance assessment and on the company as a whole. She has asked that,
in order to keep the discussion on the new divisional structure simple, you use the
existing transfer pricing policy to do illustrative calculations. She stated that she would
reallocate head office costs to the two new components divisions in proportion to their
cost of sales.
You are provided with the following financial and other information for Landual Lamps.
Actual data for Landual Lamps for the year ended 31 March 2013
Sales
Electrical
Housing
sub-total
Components
Division
$000
1,557
8,204
9,761
Assembly
Division
$000
Landual
Lamps
$000
15,794
15,794
804
6,902
7,706
1,557
8,204
9,761
7,706
370
1,302
1,672
461
(78)
1,268
2,046
2,719
2,940
2,507
2,641
Cost of sales
Electrical
Housing
sub-total
Fixed production costs
Electrical
Housing
sub-total
Allocated head office costs
Profit
Note:
1 The components division has had problems meeting budgets recently, with an adverse
variance of $575,000 in the last year. This variance arises in relation to the cost of sales
for housing component production.
Required:
(a) Evaluate the current system of transfer pricing at Landual, using illustrative
calculations as appropriate.
(15 marks)
(b) Advise the finance director (FD) on the impact of changing the transfer pricing
policy for housing components as suggested by the FD and comment on your
results, using illustrative calculations as appropriate.
(20 marks)
(c) Evaluate the impact of the change in proposed divisional structure on the
profit in the divisions and the company as directed by the FD.
(15 marks)
13
Assignment No.: __
Grade/Marks
ID
Office
Acknowledgement
Module/Subject Information
Module/Subject Code
Module/Subject Name
Lecturer/Tutor/Facilitator
Due Date
Assignment Title/Topic
Intake (where applicable)
Word Count
Date/Time
Declaration
. I/We have read and understood the Programme Handbook that explains on plagiarism, and I/we
testify that, unless otherwise acknowledged, the work submitted herein is entirely my/our own.
. I/We declare that no part of this assignment has been written for me/us by any other person(s) except
where such collaboration has been authorized by the lecturer concerned.
. I/We authorize the University to test any work submitted by me/us, using text comparison software,
for instances of plagiarism. I/We understand this will involve the University or its contractors copying
my/our work and storing it on a database to be used in future to test work submitted by others.
Note:1) The attachment of this statement on any electronically submitted assignments will be deemed
to have the same authority as a signed statement.
2) The Group Leader signs the declaration on behalf of all members.
Signature:
Date:
mail:
14
Feedback/Comments*
Main Strengths
Main Weaknesses
Graders signature
Students signature:
Date:
Date:
Note:
15
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Chapters in books
Journal articles
Conference papers
Newspaper articles
Magazines
Websites
Study guide
17
1st offence
19
ACC301
Subject Name
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING 3
This examination carries 70% of the total assessment for this subject.
Examiner(s)
Moderator(s)
MR SELVANADAN MUNIAPPAN
Day
Date
Time :
Time allowed :
Reading 10 MINUTES
Writing 3 HOURS
INSTRUCTION(S):
1. This examination consists of FIVE (5) problem solving and discussion questions.
2. All questions are COMPULSORY and must be attempted.
3. Students are required to answer ALL questions in the answer booklet provided.
4. This is a CLOSED BOOK examination.
5. Students are NOT permitted to retain this examination paper.
6. Students MUST pass this examination to pass the subject.
(This question paper consists of 5 questions in XX printed pages, including cover page)
20
Normal Time
(days)
7
34
3
12
20
9
8
11
17
16
Normal Cost
($)
1000
3900
400
1800
1600
1500
1800
1100
1500
3200
Crash Time
(days)
5
33
2
12
15
6
6
11
15
16
Required:
(a) Draw a network diagram for the project showing the task letters on the
activity paths.
(5 marks)
(b) Identify the critical path, and, if the work is to be carried out at normal cost,
calculate the minimum time for completion.
(3 marks)
(c) Calculate the absolute minimum time in which the project could be
completed, and the minimum total cost at which that completion time could
be achieved.
(10 marks)
(d) Explain how a network diagram and the associated time and cost estimates
may be used for control purposes while a complex project is in progress.
(5 marks)
(e) Assume that the project described in the question is nearing completion and
that the contract contains severe penalty provisions if the work is not
finished by the specified date. The only task not completed is task J, which
has been in progress for 4 days, and only 12 days remain before the
specified completion date. The work on task J is on schedule so far as time
is concerned, but instead of costing $200 per day for 16 days as expected, it
is costing $350 per day. It is felt that an investigation costing $400 might
show that this is due to a problem in the way the work is being carried out.
If the investigation showed this to be the problem, it could be rectified at a
cost of $1000. This would lead to the cost being reduced to $200 per day
for the remaining days. If it is felt that the probability of being able to trace
and immediately rectify the problem is 0.7, should the contractor undertake
the investigation?
(7 marks)
$100
$80
$90
Required:
(a) The accumulated production of each firm is now: P 4000 units, Q 7000
units and R 5000 units. Calculate the current unit cost of product A for each
firm.
(4 marks)
(b) The current market selling price for product A is $55 per unit. What profit
per unit is being earned by each firm?
(3 marks)
(c) Current market shares for each firm are: P 15%, Q 60%, R 25%. Q wishes
to analyse future cost positions to evaluate some strategies. In particular, Q
wishes to determine the expected unit costs for each firm after it has
reached an accumulated production of 12 000 units.
(i) If the market shares remain the same, calculate the expected
accumulated production for firms P and R when Q has reached the 12 000
unit level.
(4 marks)
(ii) Given the result of (i), calculate the expected unit cost position for each
of the three firms.
(5 marks)
(d) Suppose that firm Q decides to lower its selling price now (before the
changes suggested in part c) to $40 per unit. Suggest the likely outcome.
(4 marks)
Selling price
Direct materials
Direct labour (cutting and
finishing)
Variable overhead
Fixed overhead
Labour requirements (hours):
Cutting
Finishing
23
Grade A
$30.00
$5.60
$12.00
Grade B
$20.00
$2.00
$10.00
$2.40
$1.44
$2.00
$1.12
0.50
0.40
0.50
0.20
The Cutting Department has 400 hours available each week. The Finishing
Department has 240 hours available each week.
Fixed overhead is allocated using a plant-wide rate based on direct labour hours
when the denominator level of activity is equal to maximum weekly plant
capacity.
Sales are limited to a maximum of 800 units of Grade A and 600 units of Grade
B per week.
Required:
(a) Calculate the unit contribution margin for each Grade.
(4 marks)
(b) Calculate the budgeted weekly fixed overhead in the plant.
(3 marks)
(c) If budgeted fixed overhead is the only fixed expense and if management
wishes to produce and sell Grades A and B in the ratio 3:1, how many units
of each should management plan to produce and sell in a week to earn a net
profit of $416?
(3 marks)
(d) Instead of producing the product mix in part (c), management wishes to use
linear programming to find the profit-maximising mix. Write an LP model
and solve to determine the optimum weekly mix and the resulting weekly
net profit.
(8 marks)
24