Iskcon Bangalore
Iskcon Bangalore
Iskcon Bangalore
1 Jan 2009
Rs.15
CONTENTS
Official: Personally, I do not like the idea Therefore, I want to know what are the
of killing animals. principles—the rules and regulations—
Srila Prabhupada: But what is the ideal of the order.
of your order? That I am asking. Official: Our principles are love, beauty,
Official: Love between men. harmony, peace. And as you progress,
Understanding. one initiation after another. If you begin
as a butcher, then gradually, in your
Srila Prabhupada: What have the
own self, you will wish to give it
animals done? There is no love or
up. But there are no rules.
understanding shown to them.
Srila Prabhupada: "One
Official: I love the animals. I have many
initiation after another,"
animals living with me. I'm surrounded by
but there are no
animals. [Laughter.]
progressive
Srila Prabhupada: That is nice. But a rules?
person who is habituated to kill
Official:
animals—will he be admitted into your
Our order
order?
doesn't
Official: I don't think someone who require
kills animals would like to enter, but that you
if a butcher wants to enter, that is
all right, because gradually we will
elevate him.
Srila Prabhupada: Then, in
principle, the order does not
allow animal killing?
Official: Ideally, our movement
would not want to see
animals killed, or anyone
killed.
Srila Prabhupada:
give up meat-eating. Our order is intelligent. If we were Srila Prabhupada: But, for instance, the Bible imposes
to tell people, "Don't do this, don't do this, don't do that," the rule or regulation "You shall not kill." Yet you have
nobody would join us. In any case, the real mystic is no such thing.
someone who has controlled his own body. Official: Realization is what counts.
Srila Prabhupada: But you cannot explain how to Srila Prabhupada: Yes, but what that realization is you
control the body. cannot explain. If you cannot explain, then what is your
Official: It happens immediately, or it will happen in a realization?
while. Official: Had I not realized something, I would not be
Srila Prabhupada: At least I cannot accept this. We here now.
could discuss further if you had some definite program. Srila Prabhupada: Then first let us see whether you
Say I want to enter your association. You must give me can describe who you are.
some prescription by which, if I follow, I'll make progress.
Official: When Moses saw the burning bush and asked
But you have no such prescription.
the fire, "Who are you?" the fire said, "I am what I am."
Official: I shall submit to my grandmaster your request Who am I? That is a question you are going to have to
for a specific prescription to be given to you. answer by your own meditations.
Srila Prabhupada: But, in principle, your order hasn't Srila Prabhupada: But what is your meditation? What
got any such prescription. have you learned?
Official: We will make one special, just for you. Official: The thing to realize is peace. When you join
Srila Prabhupada: But not for the general mass of our order, you receive a letter, and at the bottom of the
people. letter, it says, "With our best wishes for your peace and
Official: Correct. It is very good that you prescribe no happiness."
meat-eating, no intoxicants, no premarital or extramarital Srila Prabhupada: That's all right. Everyone wants that.
sex, and so on. These are nice principles that you are But what is the process?
following. And we are sure that you have come to these Official: Praying, courage, faith. A serious movement,
conclusions—on your own—just as perhaps one day a serious order, would never guarantee instantaneous
we may also come to these conclusions—on our own. illumination.
Srila Prabhupada: So for the time being, your order Srila Prabhupada: No, that we also say. But we must
has no such rules and regulations? have a definite process. For instance, in answer to the
Official: Our order makes certain suggestions, but we question "Who are you?"—because at least one must
do not oblige anyone to follow our suggestions. know who he is—you gave the vague reply "I am what
Srila Prabhupada: What are those suggestions? I am." If you ask me, "Who are you, sir?" and I say, "I
am what I am," is that the proper answer? [Laughter.]
Official: Our movement suggests that people live a life
That is a nonsense answer.
as perhaps yours is—of purity, pure thoughts, moral
living, and even following certain principles. Official: I could tell you my name, but the interior, the
reality, is different. Now, if we all join together in silence
Srila Prabhupada: But these impure things are going
and we enter into ourselves and create one person,
on all over the world, and you don't say anything.
then we will know who we are—from that silence.
Suppose a man is killing animals. You don't prohibit
him. He is engaged in immoral life, and if you don't Srila Prabhupada: But how it is possible to remain
prohibit him, then how can he become moral? Do you silent?
think morality and the killing of animals go together? Disciple [in jest]: Bahunam janmanam ante: "After
Official: Our order likes very much the ideals of beauty many, many births and deaths."
and harmony and morality, but we cannot impose these Srila Prabhupada [laughing]: That's all right. That's all
things on anyone. right.
Fasting Festivals
Jan 21 Ekadashi Jan 10 Ratha Yatra in Bangalore
Jan 22 break fast Jan 24 Ratha Yatra in Mangalore
Feb 6 Ekadashi Jan 31 Ratha Yatra in Bellary
Fasting till noon for Varaha
Feb 2 Sri Advaita Acharya—Appearance
Dev’s and Nityananda
Fasting till noon
Prabhu’s appearance
Feb 6 Sri Varaha Deva—Appearance
Fasting till noon
Feb 7 Sri Nityananda Prabhu—Appearance
Thakur Haridas
great learned Pandits to hear the teachings of Srila Thakur to the real teaching of the Scriptures. The alternatives of
Haridas, at which time Gopal Chakravarti arose in offense enjoyment and abstention from enjoyment exhaust,
against the Saint. Consequently, Gopal was stricken by indeed, the possibilities of function of the mind and body;
leprosy—the circumstances of which will be described but they have no application to the soul who is located
in Part III.] Part III beyond the reach of body and mind. The soul is
The world is gratuitously assumed by a pseudo-rationalism substantially different from the mind and body. The soul
to be the only reality and the attempt is therefore made
to ascertain the methods by following which we can attain
From the book "Sree Krishna-Chaitanya" is the substantive reality while the mind is only his perverted
reflection in the mirror of limited existence. The mind is
by Professor Sannyal the material shadow, so to say, of the soul who is the
the gratification of the senses, which function appears to
be the relationship naturally subsisting between ourselves enriched, deepened and broadened by more experience On the attainment of this desirable goal there is no spiritual substance. The mind is a material phenomenon
and the world. The senses are assumed to be an integral and that it is worth our while to help this process in a difference between the devotee, devotion and the Object galvanised into the appearance of self-consciousness by
and undetachable part of ourselves. The mind is identified conscious manner. To this the answer would be that the of devotion. The service of the Brahman is thus only a the impulse communicated to it by the deluded soul. Mind
with the senses on the one hand and with the soul on better and more detailed realization of our utter ignorance, temporary means to a final end, which means being is the shadow of the perverse soul mirrored in matter.
the other. The senses connect the mind, or the soul, by in the midst of the mockery of a civilization that is claimed different from the end and is, therefore, necessarily This description is, and can be, but an imperfect and
this assumption, with the external world. The senses are to be based upon knowledge, would be a self-contradiction terminable with the attainment of the goal. It is the highest misleading analogy of the relationship that actually subsists
the eyes of the whole system. All pain and pleasure that is not likely to appeal to the assorting instinct of our form of religion to try to realize, by the appropriate methods, between mind and soul. The shadow of the material
suffered by the mind are due to the way in which the rational nature and is calculated to make our condition the knowledge of, and absorption into, the undifferentiated substance is not categorically different from the substance
mind directs the senses in their relations with the world. no better than it is. Civilized wickedness and filth are not Brahman. When the individual soul becomes one with itself, both of them being material phenomena. The
The mind cannot apparently know by intuition, at any rate preferable to any nuisance of the uncivilized state. Satan, the Brahman the state of separate existence and necessity shadow of the soul in this case is, however, categorically
ordinarily, all the consequences of any particular mode who may be allowed to possess the perfection of worldly for any kind of distinguishable function terminate together. different from the soul, being a material phenomenon
of employment of the senses. The mind can, indeed, try culture, is probably more miserable than the uncivilized According to Gopal Chakravarti and his associates this pure and simple. The soul in his spiritual or natural
to guess about them. But it can never be quite sure about Gond. It would be difficult for the unbiased reason of man knowledge of the Brahman is higher than service and the condition is categorically different from material
any occurrence till after actual experience. This uncertainty to choose between materialistic savagery and materialistic termination of both knowledge and service is the highest phenomena. The soul is self-conscious itself. There can
is supposed to be reducible to certainty if it could be civilization. goal. Gopal is quite sure that this is the only teaching of be no such thing as ignorance in the soul. There can be
possible to know from experience the uniform "laws" that the Scriptures. It may be observed at this place that no such thing as genuine self-consciousness in the mind
"Ignorance is misery," says one of the wisest of proverbs. which is non-soul. The apparent self-consciousness of
are assumed to govern all phenomenal occurrences Increase of ignorance is not any decrease of misery. Shankara does not discard the principle of worship, but
under all circumstances. This hypothesis of the uniform declares its tentative necessity which is terminable on the mind is really a state of complete ignorance which is
Ignorance is supposed to be the state of all empiric given its shape and color by the qualities of matter:
operation of the "laws" of Nature has been built up by knowledge which is improperly assumed to be alone self-realization which, according to him, is identical with
the accumulated "experiences" of the race. But as the complete absorption into the One. grossness, limitation, perishability, changeableness, etc.
available to man. Our very nature is sometimes supposed These unwholesome traits are non-existent and impossible
occurrences themselves present an infinity of to be incapable of real enlightenment. This axiom of Thakur Haridas distinguishes between devotion, work
complications it has not been possible to attain to anything in the soul.
pessimism is exploited for advising man to turn a deaf and knowledge. The soul in the bound state desires one
like certainty in isolating the single threads of the web in ear to the Teacher of the Absolute. It is even more of two alternative functions: If he is optimistic he wants The soul is capable of forgetting his real nature, mistaking
order to be certain to reproduce all the occurrences of disastrously utilized for condemning the devotees greater scope for enjoyment. If he happens to be himself to be a material entity. The soul is not above one
Nature in the Laboratory. themselves. pessimistic, he hankers for emancipation from the misery possible weakness, willful rebellion against the Truth. It
Assuming that the above object of scientific endeavour of mundane existence. is a real blunder on the part of the soul to choose to be
It cannot be otherwise. The soul is in this case identified a rebel. But the soul is perfectly free to refuse to serve
will be realisable in practice in the long run, its success with the mind-cum-body. Abandonment of the mind, The latter, the pessimist, sometimes thinks that real
should make it possible for us to prolong the possibility the Truth, i.e., Godhead. He thereby proves deliberately
therefore, appears as equivalent to the abandonment of emancipation is impossible so long as the consciousness false to his own substantive nature, because it is the
and scope of sensuous enjoyment ad infinitum. If we fail the soul, or to self-immolation. The mind seems to be our of one's being different or separate from the One persists.
to be perfectly "happy" by the complete elimination of constituent function of the soul, in his natural state of
all. Groping in perpetual ignorance appears as our It is to this extreme school of atheistic Vedantists, perfect spiritual existence, to be the exclusive servant of
"pain" by the proper employment of the "forces" of Nature inevitable function, miscalled "Search for the Truth." advocating unification with the Brahman, that Gopal
in the way that is calculated to produce such a result the Truth. The soul who rebels against Godhead is
Empiric enthusiasts imaginatively describe this process Chakravarti, like most cultured people of his day as well punished by his exile to the phenomenal world and by
under the then-known "laws of Nature," our labours should as the "eternal quest." These metaphors and denunciations as of this, happened to belong by his empiric
still have really no abiding value for ourselves. But has incarceration in the double material case of mind and
do not, however, help us in any way; but, on the contrary, predisposition. According to this school fruitive work leads body. This point will be further elucidated later.
our "experience" up to the present moment taken us an they only tend to obstruct the process of the real quest. to empiric knowledge and the latter to the third position
inch towards the realization of unmixed or lasting pleasure? of inexpressible oneness with the Brahman. Devotion or Fruitive work and empiric knowledge are functions of the
Is "pleasure" really different from "pain"? Or is it only Gopal Chakravarti is a typical brahmana of the pseudo- mind and, therefore, purely material phenomena. By
Vedantic School of Shankara. He has no doubts regarding service is classed under fruitive work, which is assigned
different by circumstance? That which is food for the a lower position than empiric knowledge. The process of means of such work and knowledge the deluded soul
goose is food for the gander, is not found to be more true the goal of the Vedanta. According to him the attainment cannot realize his natural function for the plain reason
of the Knowledge of the Brahman, Who possesses no advance to the goal of complete unification with the One,
than most hypotheses. Variation, which is sought to be according to this school, is devotion (blind faith rendering that they are not his proper function at all. By means of
eliminated, is found on close inspection and analysis to distinctive function at all that is capable of being defined, work and knowledge the soul only moves in a vicious
is the goal. By the attainment of the knowledge of the possible utilitarian work of a low order) (Bhakti) leading
be itself the indispensable condition of the pleasures. We to work of a higher order (Karma), which, in its turn, leads circle of material existence which is seemingly conscious
are, therefore, left inevitably to the present condition of real Nature of the Brahman, the individual soul is freed but is really one of absolute ignorance. This is the
from all the miseries of his apparent existence which only up to empiric knowledge of the uselessness of all
necessary and complete ignorance in order to have any knowledge and all activity terminating in perfect absorption explanation why, by means of the undifferentiated
"pleasure" at all by our dealings with the world by means seems to be limited and is, therefore, only supposed to knowledge of the Brahman, freedom from the fetters of
be miserable. As there is only One Entity, the Brahman, into the One.
of our senses. work and knowledge of this anomalous existence can be
Who is ever free from all defects and all merits, the goal Haridas is neither a pessimist nor an optimist. He is an attained by crores of years of endeavour. This is what
It is argued that pleasure and pain might themselves by can be no other than complete absorption into the One. absolutist. He is convinced that the theory of complete Gopal says. The delay is, however, not due to the
12 Krishna Voice, Jan 2009 Krishna Voice, Jan 2009 13
complexity of the process, as he supposes it to be. So the pseudo-Vedantists.
long as a person continues to suppose that an impersonal The point reached marks almost the limit of rational
all-pervasive Entity is the goal of knowledge one is not discussion toward the spiritual issue which is open to
yet freed from the real ignorance of his spiritual function. the empiricist. He cannot proceed further without
This must be so, because Truth is not impersonal. discarding the method of empiricism by giving up
Neither is Truth a person in the sense in which the completely the process of his unaided effort. It was not
mentalists, including Shankara, apparently want us to possible for Gopal Chakravarti to retrace his steps by
understand the term. Spiritual personality is categorically any other method. That he was not at all prepared for
different from the distorted empiric notion of the same. this is proved by his offensive conduct towards Thakur
Until the nature of the Personality of the Truth is properly Haridas who had, therefore, no other alternative but to
grasped, one continues in the deluded state which is leave him to the mercies of Maya. But the actual good
also the state of limitation (bondage). Therefore Gopal will of Haridas towards the offender bore its fruit in the
Chakravarti is right, although he is unaware of it, in swift punishment, that could be intelligible to the sufferer
holding that the chance of emancipation of a person himself, that smote him in the form of leprosy. Gopal
who has attained to the notion of Godhead as an was, thereby, afforded an excellent opportunity of revising
impersonal and inactive, although all-pervasive and his impersonal doctrine. But he was of course free to
transcendental, Entity, is very slight. Gopal does not avail of it or not.
understand that his ideal person is also necessarily no The Godless attitude is an attitude of absolute confidence
less deluded than himself if he supposes his condition in one's own judgment and power. The atheist is not at
to be the goal. all disposed to submit to another in any circumstances.
The interpretation of the text relied upon by Gopal He has to be compelled to submit to non-God because
Chakravarti, said Thakur Haridas, is that of a person he can consistently submit only to compelling force.
who does not understand the Nature of the Name by Such submission alone is appreciated in the state of
reason of his having no access to Him. The deluded sin and ignorance which is a radically false position and
person is no longer consciously contradicting himself necessarily entails constant irrational conduct on a really
and is not, therefore, insincere in the sense of being rational being unnaturally disposed to accept the same
double-tongued. He is certainly to be pitied. Neither can through the no less unnatural fear of punishment.
his conduct be regarded as sincere inasmuch as it is The Holy Name of Godhead is not a thing of this world.
opposed to his real nature of which he only happens to The Name of Godhead is identical with Godhead Himself.
be ignorant by his own conscious perversity. The empiric The Godhead appears in this world in the Form of the
casuist who affects to believe in the impersonal nature Name on the lips of His pure devotees. He appears as
of the Truth is only pushing his conscious perversity of the transcendental Sound on the spiritual lips of the
the choice of untruth to its logical conclusion. If the soul in the state of grace.
deliberate error is not ignored his conduct cannot be
regarded as consistent, being altogether untrue. The Name of Godhead appearing on the lips of a pure
devotee as the Transcendental Sound, is perceptible
Gopal Chakravarti's source of error lay deeper than the as such only to the spiritual ear. These statements are
plane on which he stood and was, therefore, naturally likely to appear absurd and puerile to the dogmatic
incomprehensible to him in his condition of cultured impersonalist. Can the soul, he will persist to ask, have
perversity. The Vaishnavas, who alone understand the lips and ears? Can the soul have senses? But—can
real cause of the worldly ailment, alone possess the the empiricist know, even if he have?
true spirit of toleration. Thakur Haridas showed his
toleration of the rank atheism of deluded Gopal The transcendentalists maintain that the soul has an
Chakravarti by abstaining from disturbing him further. infinity of senses of which the physical senses are a
This toleration really means the withdrawal of his perverted reflection. There cannot even be the shadow
causeless, apparently aggressive, mercy from a deluded of existence of the physical senses if there were no
soul whose opposition to Godhead is likely to be substantive spiritual senses. But there are also the
increased by the process. It is the greatest possible spiritual senses themselves as distinct from but not
misfortune that can befall a conditioned soul to miss the unrelated to their corresponding shadowy reflections in
special mercy of the Vaishnava by his successful this phenomenal world. This is involved in the very
opposition to the Truth. The apparent intolerance of a definition of the Absolute. The spiritual sense is
Vaishnava is as helpful to a person as his tolerance of categorically different from the physical sense. The
evil. The Vaishnava never cooperates with the offending spiritual senses are perfect and self-conscious, there
soul in his sinful activities. He does not agree to be false being no interval or barrier of time or space between
to himself and his eternal Master to please the confirmed the sense and its possessor. The spiritual body is
apostate. Such sympathetic toleration of evil is a grave indivisible and perfectly self-conscious in every part and
offence against the Truth notwithstanding the significant is identical with the owner of the body. All this is
fact that it alone is relished by the pantheistic school of incomprehensible to us although it is perfectly consistent
14 Krishna Voice, Jan 2009
with the fundamental principles of indivisible substantive Mazumdars.
existence, that are also acceptable to the empiricist. Thakur Haridas mercifully explains that the different
The empiricist, although he may sometimes, under concrete forms of the so-called 'liberation' concocted
pressure of his own logic, seem to agree with the by the mentalists as their unknowable summum-bonum
conclusions of transcendentalism, finds it impossible to are the outcome of the desire for sensuous gratification.
adopt them in practice. The absolute conduct is not If one could live in the happy realms of Krishna described
possible on the mundane plane to which he finds himself in the Scriptures, the empiricist supposes that such a
strictly confined by his own postulates backed by the person should be enabled to enjoy more good things
real Deluding Potency. than are available on the Earth if his condition is really
If one is merely disposed to regard any sound as worth having. The same desire for extended opportunities
transcendental, such wish alone will not make the sound of sensuous enjoyment happens also to be the real
of his choice to become really transcendental. Similarly, motive behind the formulation of the other 'forms' of the
if a person is disposed to regard a transcendental Sound empiricist's 'saved' existence. The grossness of the
as an occurrence of the mundane atmosphere such ideal of liberation is fully unmasked when one is told
attitude will not also affect the subjective nature of the that the salvationist's "final" form is to become the equal
transcendental Sound. There is real difference between of Godhead by merging with the Object of his worship!
the transcendental Sound and mundane sound. The It is to this unnatural and profane position that the
transcendental Sound is identical with the object denoted unchecked speculations of the mentalists are logically
by the sound. The mundane sound is separated from bound to lead in the long run. Thakur Haridas ascribes
the object denoted by it by the intervals of time and the grossness of the ideal to the attitude of the empiric
space. To hear the mundane sound of the name of a thinker, the insatiable desire for sensuous pleasure.
Lion is not the same thing as to see the beast. On the
spiritual plane the very word 'Lion' is identical with the The desire to enjoy is categorically different from, and
animal. The animal is fully realisable by and in the wholly incompatible with, the desire to serve, to love.
hearing of his name. Whereas the real nature of the If one feels a real desire to serve Krishna he would lose
mundane animal, denoted by the mundane sound, ever all taste for his own enjoyment. All impurity,
remains a thing unknown. unwholesomeness and misery are fortunately and
mercifully ordained by the Lord as the inevitable
The Name of Krishna is identical with Godhead. But the consequence of the insatiable desire for selfish
Name of Krishna does not manifest Himself on mundane enjoyment. But the soul who turns away from immediate
lips nor to the mundane ear. The Name Krishna appears enjoyment by considerations of greater prospective
in His Form of the Transcendental Sound on the spiritual enjoyment in the sequel, cannot also for that very reason
lips of His devotees and is heard by the spiritual ear of realize the condition of loving devotion to the Feet of
the submissive soul by the Grace of Krishna. The Name the Lord, however strongly impressed he may profess
Krishna is identical with the Possessor of the Name. to be of the desirability of such a state. He is, no doubt,
The Name Krishna appears to the listening ear, as He free to think that he really desires it; but at the same
is, only by degrees. As soon as the dormant soul catches time he is wholly incapable of ever attaining to it by such
the first faint reflection of His Light he is at once desire. But, says Thakur Haridas, he may nevertheless
completely free from the bondage of ignorance and sin. attain to love for Krishna by the Chanting of the Holy
It is the Name Who comes of His Own accord to our Name, by the Grace of the Holy Name Himself. This is
fettered soul. The bound jiva, or living entity, has no the special Dispensation for the Age which is so
access to the Presence of Krishna on his own initiative. irremediably speculative; and there is no other way open
Krishna's Approach is heralded by the harbinger of Light to this Age for attaining to the loving service of Krishna.
whose first glimmerings on their appearance put an end
to all misconception regarding the categorical difference Haridas refers to the texts of the Scriptures to prove the
between light and darkness. truth of his statements. This is the only proper use of
the Shastras. The Shastras bear witness to the Truth
Unless and until the soul becomes aware of the true of the realizations of all really pure souls.
nature of spiritual existence by being so enlightened by
the Source of all consciousness, he is sure to mistake There is one other fact which is worthy of our notice.
the mind for his real self and the mental function as the The Pandits of the learned assembly, headed by Hiranya
only knowledge. If at this stage he does not wilfully shut Mazumdar, the master of the house, took the side of
his eyes but keeps them turned towards the growing Thakur Haridas. They not only strongly censured the
Light he gradually and in due course obtains the sight conduct of Gopal Chakravarti in the open assembly but
of the concrete Source of all light. This is the mode of Hiranya Mazumdar thought it his duty to renounce all
Appearance of the Holy Name. The sight of Krishna is further connection with a brahmana who could be guilty
alone capable of inspiring love for Krishna. This the of an act of discourtesy to the devotee of Godhead.
position of Thakur Haridas as explained by himself to Nevertheless the Pandits and Mazumdar himself felt
the Pandits who were in assembly at the house of the themselves involved in the sin of Gopal Chakravarti by
Krishna Voice, Jan 2009 15
the unhappy circumstance of their having had to hear
most reluctantly the blasphemous words uttered by
Gopal in their presence. For this sin the only expiation,
prescribed by the Shastras, was to seek in all humility
the pardon of Thakur Haridas, not for the offender, but
for themselves. This is not mere courtesy, but an
unavoidable necessity if one really wants to serve the
Truth. Any association, deliberate or accidental, with
untruth tends to obscure our vision of the Truth, Who
is, indeed, a very Jealous Master. Those who are
disposed to serve the Truth with causeless, loving
devotion, throw to the winds all considerations of ignorant
propriety or ignorant justice and are never satisfied by
serving the Truth by all their senses at all times and in
all circumstances. By the grace of Thakur Haridas this
instinct of loving devotion actually manifested itself in
the conduct of those who had listened with faith to the
Absolute Truth from his pure lips.
Sri Raghunathdas Goswami was a child at this time.
He used to visit the Thakur in his hut during his stay at
Chandpur. The boy was the fortunate recipient of the
mercy of Thakur Haridas. This is considered by Sri
Krishnadas Kaviraj Goswami as the real cause of
Raghunath Das's subsequent unique devotion to the
Feet of Sri Chaitanya. The mercy of a sadhu acts equally
on all persons, irrespective of age, sex or condition—
all of whom have an equal chance of being benefited
by associating with a real sadhu. The interests of the
soul are not capable of being adversely affected by any
worldly conditions. The boy's soul has no defect of
immaturity any more than that of an old man the
advantage of maturity. Such maturity or immaturity has
no relevancy in one's associating with a sadhu. The
boy's soul, equally with the soul of the old man, may or
may not be disposed to listen to the words of a sadhu
for the genuine purpose of acting up to the same. It is
as necessary for a child to associate with a sadhu as
for an adult; but in neither case can one be sure of
obtaining the mercy of the sadhu with whom he may
choose to associate. The sadhu is kind to one who is
really inclined to serve Godhead. It is the function of a
sadhu to foster one's inclination for the service of the
Lord by means of his conduct and words. The articulated
sound is, however, the sadhu's unambiguous weapon
to fight all un-Godliness. It should puzzle the muddled
brain of the whole race of self-conceited empiricists to
understand why and how the sadhu need have no other
work except talking about almost anything to whom he
likes. Any person who is spoken to by a sadhu, even
for the tiny space of a second, has every chance of
attaining the real object of life which is unattainable by
infinite endeavour by any other method. Nay, it is our
duty to listen to a real sadhu, if we are fortunate enough
to meet him, in preference to all other duties, which are
not only of secondary importance, but are a positive
obstruction on the path of the highest and only good.
End—Part III
Vidya Dana
ISKCON Bangalore
initiated the distribution of
free note books to
government school
students. At the inaugural
function of this Vidya Dana
programme, Sri Ashwath
Narayan, (MLA, Mallesh-
waram) distributed free
note books to students of
the Government High
School in Malleshwaram.
The free note book
distribution at that school
was sponsored by First
Flight couriers.
24