China's Carbon Peak
China's Carbon Peak
China's Carbon Peak
COMMENT
that the science is useful, usable and used9.
A high-level, transdisciplinary body
of international experts in disaster-risk
reduction should be established by national
governments and international organizations dealing with disaster risks, with input
from various sectors and civil society. Such
a body would have the reach and influence
from local communities, businesses and
governments to raise peoples awareness.
The same findings presented by an independent scientist or article would not.
The main practical difficulties will be in
incorporating the fields diverse information
and practices into an assessment, and demonstrating to policy-makers that it need not take
a extreme event to cause catastrophic human
consequences10. Government support for
the process will be essential. Synergies must
be found by combining and consolidating
disaster-risk reduction efforts across UN
institutions.
Disaster-risk management, climate
change and sustainable development targets will need to be aligned. For example,
there should be a coordinated assessment of
the state of knowledge in disaster risk and
its utility for supporting the UN Sustainable
Development Goals and the UN Framework
Convention on Climate Change.
Knowledge transfer will make communitybased resilience efforts possible. Illuminating
findings, best practices and state-of-the-art
modelling must become part of the evidencebased strategy for disaster-risk reduction.
Susan L. Cutter is professor of geography
at the University of South Carolina in
Columbia, USA. Alik Ismail-Zadeh is a
senior scientist in applied geosciences at the
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe,
Germany, and at the Russian Academy
of Sciences, Moscow, Russia. Irasema
Alcntara-Ayala, Orhan Altan, Daniel
N. Baker, Salvano Briceo, Harsh Gupta,
Ailsa Holloway, David Johnston, Gordon
A. McBean, Yujiro Ogawa, Douglas Paton,
Emma Porio, Rainer K. Silbereisen,
Kuniyoshi Takeuchi, Giovanni B.
Valsecchi, Coleen Vogel, Guoxiong Wu.
e-mail: scutter@sc.edu
1. Cutter, S. L. Chall. Sustain. 1, 7279 (2014).
2. Ismail-Zadeh, A. & Takeuchi, K. Nat. Hazard. 42,
459467 (2007).
3. Palmer, L. Nature Clim. Change 3, 857858 (2013).
4. Ismail-Zadeh, A. in Extreme Natural Hazards,
Disaster Risks and Societal Implications (eds
Ismail-Zadeh, A. et al.) 4760 (Cambridge Univ.
Press, 2014).
5. Gall, M., Nguyen, K. H. & Cutter, S. L. Int. J. Disast.
Risk Reduct. 12, 255267 (2015).
6. McBean, G. A. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 4,
122127 (2012).
7. Erisman, J. W., Brasseur, G., Ciais, P., van Eekeren,
N. & Theis, T. L. Nature 519, 151153 (2015).
8. Burton, I. Environ. Hazard. 3, 139141 (2001).
9. Boaz, A. & Hayden, C. Evaluation 8, 440453 (2002).
10. Cutter, S. L. J. Extrem. Events 1, 14 (2014).
Full author affiliations accompany this article online
at go.nature.com/fihq6v
Steps to Chinas
carbon peak
COMMENT
decrease in projected emissions between
2015 and 2035 that is almost equivalent to the
total global CO2 emissions in 2013 30gigatonnes (see Carbon crunch). This challenging goal is within reach if China keeps its
annual growth in emissions below 2%, rolls
out a national carbon-trading system and
obtains 30% of its energy from renewables
and natural gas by around 2035. Chinas per
capita emissions in 2030 would then mirror
those of the European Union (EU) in 2013 (a
little under 8tonnes of CO2 per person).
We propose four steps for China to hit this
ambitious target. It must strengthen regional
emissions targets; improve the reporting and
verification of emissions data; enhance the
regulation and supervision of a nationwide
emissions-trading market; and incentivize
the uptake of green technologies, especially
in underdeveloped regions.
Set regional emissions targets. A single
target will not be suitable for all of Chinas
30provinces and autonomous regions,
which have different energy-source mixes,
uses and economic development needs.
Peak emissions targets need to be designed
for each region such that the national total
falls by 2030.
Wealthy cities such as Beijing, Tianjin and
Shanghai, which have reversed emissions
growth since 2011, could cap their emissions
and set and adjust reduction targets at fiveyear intervals. Developed coastal provinces,
such as Guangdong, Zhejiang and Jiangsu,
that have benefited from the pilot ETS since
2010 should pledge more-aggressive and
earlier peak targets for example, reducing carbon emissions per capita to below
those of the EU before 2030 or even 2020.
Emissions in underdeveloped regions such
as Shanxi province and the Ningxia and Xinjiang autonomous regions could be allowed
to peak after 2030 to leave room for more
infrastructure construction.
Fossil-fuel use needs to be curtailed first.
The countrys ambitious plan to cap national
coal consumption in 2015 at 3.9 gigatonnes
must be met. Beijing and Tianjin are
required to halve their coal consumption by
2017 to meet mandated air-quality requirements. All conventional coal-fired plants in
Beijing will be converted to gas by the end of
2015 and an extra 13billion cubic metres of
natural gas from western China and 12billion cubic metres from other countries are
being piped to Beijing and the surrounding
cities. Smaller cities and other regions, too,
must reduce their coal use.
China can strengthen technology-driven
improvements in emission intensity (CO2
emissions per unit of GDP), especially in the
less developed regions. But loopholes also
need to be closed. For instance, two-thirds
of regions achieved their 200209 intensityreduction targets by enlarging the scale of
production1, which increased national emissions by 50% (ref. 2). To end this practice,
emission-intensity targets should be supplemented by indicators of physical emissions efficiency, for example, emissions per
unit of steel production. Such indicators are
easier to monitor and verify and can be used
to measure the efficiency of sectors, as well
as of individual factories.
Air-quality indicators, such as particulate concentrations, should be integrated
with emissions targets. Duplicate investments and work plans are common, with
Chinas National Development and Reform
Commission (NDRC) in charge of climatechange mitigation and the Ministry of
Environment responsible for air-pollution
abatement. Better coordination between
departments and a set of joint emissionscontrol measures managed by one agency
are needed.
Emissions targets must be decoupled from
GDP. Criteria by which local and provincial
leaders are evaluated for career promotion should include energy efficiency and
pollution-abatement targets, rather than
measures of economic development. Otherwise, greater growth will always trump
environmental sustainability.
Ensure transparent emissions monitoring, reporting and verification. Data sets
for Chinas total carbon emissions, especially
those generated by regions and sectors, are
not always reliable. Official national emissions totals have differed from self-reported
provincial statistics by 20%. And in sectoral
data sets, factories may overstate their emissions to make it easier for them to achieve
reduction targets 3 .
Also, the average car- China
bon content of Chinas produced
coal is not accurately 60% of the
known, given the worlds solar
variation in the qual- photovoltaic
ity of coal used across cells in 2014,
yet less than
different regions.
As a first step, the 5% were
Chinese Academy of installed
Sciences is coordinat- domestically.
ing a national investigation of major emissions sources and sinks
that should be complete by the end of this
year4. This should be expanded to include
private and small-scale enterprises, which
tend to use inefficient and dirty technologies. Small boilers, for example, consume
about 10% of Chinas coal and are one of the
main sources of air pollution in Beijing.
The compilation and reporting of local
emissions data are coordinated by regional
environmental-protection departments,
which also issue environmental certificates for firms and construction projects.
This conflict of interest sometimes leads
to data manipulation and bribery; each
2 8 0 | NAT U R E | VO L 5 2 2 | 1 8 J U N E 2 0 1 5
COMMENT
CARBON CRUNCH
Chinas carbon dioxide emissions will grow beyond the year 2030 unless it adopts strict low-carbon measures.
Greater production efficiency, use of renewable energies and natural gas, and nationwide emissions-trading schemes
can allow emissions to peak by 2030, and reduce national CO2 emissions by 30 gigatonnes (Gt) by 2035.
20
18
Best-practice
low-carbon scenario
No mitigation
Best practices
would remove 30 Gt
of CO2.
Gt CO2
14
12
More-efficient
technologies
would lower
emissions from
manufacturing.
2010
2015
2020
30%
2025
2030
Low-emission
fuels and
renewables
30 Gt
CO2
Historical
emissions
4
2005
50%
Improved
industrial
efficiency
Without interventions,
emissions would grow by
3% per year until 2030.
16
10
Carbon-saving strategies
2035
20%
Carbon-trading
schemes
Projections on the basis of Chinas official five-year plan and reports of the International Energy Agency and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.