Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Tran Data Overview

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 20

Three-Year Data Overview for Martin Technology

Academy of Math & Science (MTA)


Designed for School Administrators & Teachers
Presented by: Thao Tran

July 6, 2016

Purpose of Presentation

Identify data trends, strengths, and weaknesses

Data types: School Demographics, Reading CRCT, and Math CRCT

Data team will advise the faculty on an Action Plan to address student
performance.

Student Demographics

Student Enrollment

Gender
N= 712

N= 685

n= 685
N= 743

Ethnicity

N= 685
N= 712
N= 743

Sub-Groups

N= 685

N= 712

N= 743

Student Demographics Summary

Total enrollment has increased each year

Very little or no change in the gender percentage

Caucasian student population are decreasing while African-American and


Latino/a student populations are increasing

ESOL, Gifted, EIP, and Free or Reduced lunch students are increasing

MTAs Reading & Math CriterionReferenced Competency Test (CRCT) Data


from
2012, 2013, 2014

MTAs 3rd Grade CRCT Reading & Math

N = 131

N = 113

N = 87

MTAs 4th Grade CRCT Reading & Math

N = 111

N = 92

N = 127

MTAs 5th Grade CRCT Reading & Math

N = 92

N = 128

N = 106

MTAs CRCT Results Summary

MTA vs. District


Reading & Math Criterion-Referenced
Competency Test (CRCT) Data from
2012, 2013, 2014

3rd Grade CRCT Reading & Math

N = 87
N = 1958

N = 113
N = 2006

N = 131
N = 1989

N = 87

N = 113

N = 131

N = 1958

N = 2006

N = 1989

4th Grade CRCT Reading & Math

N = 127

N = 92

N = 111

N = 127

N = 92

N = 111

N = 2104

N = 1960

N = 2036

N = 2104

N = 1960

N = 2036

5th Grade CRCT Reading & Math

N = 106

N = 128

N = 1945

N = 2096

N = 92
N = 1985

N = 106

N = 128

N = 92

N = 1945

N = 2096

N = 1985

MTAs CRCT Results Summary

3rd and 4th grade students outperformed the district in only years 2012
and 2014 in Reading.

3rd and 4th grade students performed lower than the district for the past
three years in Math.

5th grade student performed lower than the district in both Reading and
Math in 2012.

5th grade students outperformed the district in both Reading and Math in
2013 and 2014.

Discussion
Strengths

Number of Gifted students are


increasing each year. How can we
continue to challenge them?
Higher percentage of students meeting
or exceeding Reading standards. What
can we contribute to the success of
these students?
Our 5th grade students showed the
most growth compared to 3rd and 4th
grade students and students in the
district. What strategies are working
and can be shared?

Weaknesses

Number of EIP students are increasing


each year. What can we do to help
these students and boost their
performance?
Higher number of 3rd and 4th students
Not Meeting the standards in Math.
What tools and strategies can we use to
enhance and improve instruction?

Moving Forward
Meet with your team members and gather Data by standards to
look for strengths and weaknesses in your grade. Lets interpret
the data together so we can further improve instruction!

You might also like