Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 596 views

    Presentation Marking Table

    Uploaded by

    hex0x1
    This document contains a marking scheme for oral presentations with criteria in the areas of structure, communication, figures/results, and managing questions. Presentations will be evaluated on a scale of 1 to 10 for each criteria based on attributes like having a clear story/flow, using time effectively, making eye contact, being coherent, having appropriate and readable figures, and demonstrating a deep understanding of the project when answering questions. Scores from each criteria will be averaged according weighting to determine the final score. Space is provided to record scores and for optional comments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Presentation Marking Table

    Uploaded by

    hex0x1
    596 views1 page
    This document contains a marking scheme for oral presentations with criteria in the areas of structure, communication, figures/results, and managing questions. Presentations will be evaluated on a scale of 1 to 10 for each criteria based on attributes like having a clear story/flow, using time effectively, making eye contact, being coherent, having appropriate and readable figures, and demonstrating a deep understanding of the project when answering questions. Scores from each criteria will be averaged according weighting to determine the final score. Space is provided to record scores and for optional comments.

    Original Description:

    Presentation Marking Table (1)

    Original Title

    Presentation Marking Table (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains a marking scheme for oral presentations with criteria in the areas of structure, communication, figures/results, and managing questions. Presentations will be evaluated on a scale of 1 to 10 for each criteria based on attributes like having a clear story/flow, using time effectively, making eye contact, being coherent, having appropriate and readable figures, and demonstrating a deep understanding of the project when answering questions. Scores from each criteria will be averaged according weighting to determine the final score. Space is provided to record scores and for optional comments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    596 views1 page

    Presentation Marking Table

    Uploaded by

    hex0x1
    This document contains a marking scheme for oral presentations with criteria in the areas of structure, communication, figures/results, and managing questions. Presentations will be evaluated on a scale of 1 to 10 for each criteria based on attributes like having a clear story/flow, using time effectively, making eye contact, being coherent, having appropriate and readable figures, and demonstrating a deep understanding of the project when answering questions. Scores from each criteria will be averaged according weighting to determine the final score. Space is provided to record scores and for optional comments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    EXAMINER NAME: ________________________________

    DATE: ___________

    SESSION: ___________

    ARC 2016 ORAL PRESENTATION MARKING SCHEME


    Note: Marks must be awarded out of 10 for each criterion. They will later be averaged by weight for the final score.
    Any optional comments or notes may be made overleaf. Label them using the associated presentation number.

    PRESENTATION NUMBER

    CRITERIA (WEIGHT %)

    Structure (45%)
    Is there a story or a flow to the presentation?
    Is it in the allotted time of ten minutes? Do they use the full five minutes to answer questions?
    Is there a conclusion that summarises the presentation?
    Are the images (see below for figures) used clear and understandable?
    Is there a balance between text and images?
    Communication (25%)
    Are they speaking clearly, can the people at the back hear what they are saying?
    Do they make eye contact with the audience?
    Are they coherent and comprehensible?
    Does it sound rushed or are they filling out the time?
    Is it delivered in such a way that it holds the audiences attention?
    Are they confident in there delivery, is their body language relaxed and open?
    Figures/ Results (20%)
    Is the format of the figures appropriate (scales etc. If applicable)?
    Are they readable?
    Are they informative or useful?
    Are they accurate (error bars if applicable)?
    Do they have any meaningful results?
    Managing questions (10%)
    Is the student able to respond to all questions raised and has shown deep understanding of the project and the
    processes undergone?
    Total:

    SIGNATURE:_____________________

    You might also like