Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 21 views

    United States v. Smith, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kemba Niambi Smith appealed the district court's denial of her motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) challenging her conviction and sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court orders and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed Smith's appeal, agreeing with the reasoning provided by the district court in its orders denying Smith's motions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Smith, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    21 views2 pages
    Kemba Niambi Smith appealed the district court's denial of her motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) challenging her conviction and sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court orders and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed Smith's appeal, agreeing with the reasoning provided by the district court in its orders denying Smith's motions.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-08-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-7521

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Kemba Niambi Smith appealed the district court's denial of her motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) challenging her conviction and sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court orders and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed Smith's appeal, agreeing with the reasoning provided by the district court in its orders denying Smith's motions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    21 views2 pages

    United States v. Smith, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kemba Niambi Smith appealed the district court's denial of her motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) challenging her conviction and sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court orders and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed Smith's appeal, agreeing with the reasoning provided by the district court in its orders denying Smith's motions.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-7521

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    KEMBA NIAMBI SMITH,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
    Judge. (CR-93-162, CA-97-411-2-02)

    Submitted:

    April 25, 2000

    Decided:

    August 17, 2000

    Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Donald James Munro, Heather Hanson Anderson, SHEA & GARDNER,
    Washington, D.C.; George Kendall, NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL
    FUND, New York, New York; Laura Ellen Hankins, Washington, D.C.,
    for Appellant.
    Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
    ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Kemba Niambi Smith appeals the district courts orders denying
    her motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 1999) and
    Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e).

    We have reviewed the record and the dis-

    trict courts orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we


    deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
    reasoning of the district court.

    See United States v. Smith, Nos.

    CR-93-162; CA-97-411-2-02 (E.D. Va. Aug. 4 & Oct. 1, 1999).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like