Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 36 views

    United States v. Yhine Hines, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Yhine Hines appealed the district court's denial of his motion to alter or amend judgment related to his 2001 criminal conviction. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Hines's post-conviction motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Yhine Hines, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    36 views2 pages
    Yhine Hines appealed the district court's denial of his motion to alter or amend judgment related to his 2001 criminal conviction. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Hines's post-conviction motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-02-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-7494

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Yhine Hines appealed the district court's denial of his motion to alter or amend judgment related to his 2001 criminal conviction. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Hines's post-conviction motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    36 views2 pages

    United States v. Yhine Hines, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Yhine Hines appealed the district court's denial of his motion to alter or amend judgment related to his 2001 criminal conviction. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Hines's post-conviction motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-7494

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    YHINE HINES, a/k/a Itty,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, Chief
    District Judge. (3:01-cr-00304-JRS-8)

    Submitted:

    February 9, 2012

    Decided:

    February 14, 2012

    Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Yhine Hines, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Robert E.


    Trono, Assistant United States Attorneys, David Novak, OFFICE OF
    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Yhine Hines appeals the district courts order denying
    his motion to alter or amend judgment.
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    United States v.

    Hines, No. 3:01-cr-00304-JRS-8 (E.D. Va. Oct. 20, 2011).


    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    We
    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like