US Army - PSYOPS - Officer Manual
US Army - PSYOPS - Officer Manual
US Army - PSYOPS - Officer Manual
Officers Manual
2 July 2007
DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Distribution authorized to U.S.
Government agencies and their contractors only to protect technical or
operational information from automatic dissemination under the
International Exchange Program or by other means. This determination
was made on 4 May 2007. Other requests for this document must be
referred to Commander, United States Army John F. Kennedy Special
Warfare Center and School, ATTN: AOJK-DTD-PO, Fort Bragg, North
Carolina 28310-9610.
DESTRUCTION NOTICE: Destroy by any method that will prevent
disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document.
FOREIGN DISCLOSURE RESTRICTION (FD 6): This publication has
been reviewed by the product developers in coordination with the United
States Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School foreign
disclosure authority. This product is releasable to students from foreign
countries on a case-by-case basis only.
HEADQUARTERS
STP 33-37II-OFS
SOLDIER TRAINING
PUBLICATION
No. 33-37II-OFS
HEADQUARTERS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Washington, DC, 2 July 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Preface .....................................................................................................................................................iii
Chapter 1. Introduction...........................................................................................................................1-1
1-1. General .................................................................................................................................1-1
1-2. Background...........................................................................................................................1-1
1-3. Professional Development....................................................................................................1-1
1-4. PSYOP Branch Application ..................................................................................................1-1
Chapter 2. Trainers Guide .....................................................................................................................2-1
2-1. General .................................................................................................................................2-1
2-2. Subject Area Codes ..............................................................................................................2-2
2-3. Duty Position Training Requirements ...................................................................................2-2
2-4. Critical Tasks List..................................................................................................................2-2
2-5. Critical Tasks by Phases of the PSYOP Process.................................................................2-4
Chapter 3. MOS/Skill Level Tasks .........................................................................................................3-1
Skill Level 9
Subject Area 1: Staff Planning and Operations
331-37A-0308
____________________
DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Distribution authorized to U.S. Government agencies and their
contractors only to protect technical or operational information from automatic dissemination under the
International Exchange Program or by other means. This determination was made on 4 May 2007. Other
requests for this document must be referred to Commander, United States Army John F. Kennedy
Special Warfare Center and School, ATTN: AOJK-DTD-PO, Fort Bragg, North Carolina 28310-9610.
DESTRUCTION NOTICE: Destroy by any method that will prevent disclosure of contents or
reconstruction of the document.
FOREIGN DISCLOSURE RESTRICTION (FD 6): This publication has been reviewed by the product
developers in coordination with the United States Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and
School foreign disclosure authority. This product is releasable to students from foreign countries on a
case-by-case basis only.
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
Table of Contents
331-37A-0338
331-37A-0339
331-37A-0340
331-37A-0341
331-37A-0342
331-37A-0343
331-37A-0350
331-37A-0351
331-37A-0353
331-37A-0344
331-37A-0354
331-37A-0472
331-37A-0445
331-37A-0446
331-37A-0447
331-37A-0449
331-37A-0476
331-37A-0477
331-37A-0490
Appendix A ..............................................................................................................................................A-1
Appendix B ..............................................................................................................................................B-1
Glossary ......................................................................................................................................Glossary-1
References..............................................................................................................................References-1
ii
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
PREFACE
The Psychological Operations Mission. The mission of Psychological Operations is to influence the
behavior of foreign target audiences (TAs) to support United States (U.S.) national objectives.
Psychological Operations (PSYOP) are planned operations to convey selected information and indicators
to foreign audiences to influence the emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior
of foreign governments, organizations, groups, and individuals (JP 3-53, Joint Doctrine for Joint
Psychological Operations).
Behavioral change is at the root of the PSYOP mission. Although concerned with the mental process of
foreign TAs, it is the observable modification of foreign TA behavior that determines the mission success
of PSYOP. It is this link between influence and behavior that distinguished PSYOP from other capabilities
and activities of information operations (IO) and related components such as public affairs.
Army PSYOP is the preeminent IO core capability and the U.S. militarys primary vehicle for
communicating U.S. themes and messages to foreign TAs and influencing their behavior. As a core
capability of IO, PSYOP supports U.S. public diplomacy, public affairs, interagency communications, as
well as unit commanders. Both science and art, PSYOP are inherently effects based and frequently
require joint and interagency coordination. PSYOP help shape the physical, informational, and
psychological dimensions of the battlefield and provide a nonlethal capability across the range of military
operations. As information delivered for effect during peacetime and conflict, PSYOP inform and
influence. When properly employed PSYOP saves lives of friendly and adversary forces, as well as
noncombatants.
The Required Characteristics of a PSYOP Officer. Successful PSYOP officers are students of
influence and human interaction. They employ sophisticated methods to influence often contrary or
hostile individuals/groups of people to adopt behaviors favorable to U.S. interests. PSYOP officers are
cross-cultural communications experts that are regionally trained and possess a foreign language
capability sustained by self-study after initial training. In addition, PSYOP officers possess a rare
combination of qualities; exceptional interpersonal skills, personal lethality (warrior ethos), adaptive
thinking, leadership, and technical proficiency. PSYOP officers are extremely flexible and adaptable, are
able to survive and succeed in remote and diverse environments, austere locations, and under
unstructured or hostile conditions. They are self-reliant and able to make independent decisions based
upon the supported commanders intent with little or no immediate supervision. PSYOP officers are
leaders proficient in operating as integrated members of combined arms teams, with joint, interagency,
intergovernmental, and multinational units as well as in support of special operations forces (SOF).
PSYOP leaders are self-aware, comfortable with ambiguity, and routinely anticipate second and third
order effects of planned activities. PSYOP officers must have the ability to recommend/enact solutions to
complex political-military problems while employing a mix of conventional and/or unconventional solutions
for which no doctrinal methods or tactics/techniques/procedures may exist.
While many broad-based undergraduate programs can provide PSYOP officers with the educational
foundations and tools to be successful in influencing behavior, Figure P-1, page iv, is a list of academic
disciplines most useful to the preparation of a PSYOP officer at the under-graduate or graduate level.
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
iii
Preface
Psychology
Sociology
Communication
Anthropology
Social Neuroscience
International Relations
Organizational Behavior
Political Science
Marketing
Economic/Political Geography
Education
Advertising
Public Relations
Broadcasting
Journalism Writing/Editing
Critical branch tasks with standardized task summaries that the PSYOP company and field grade
officer must perform proficiently.
Tasks that are first trained in the PSYOP Officers Qualification Course (POQC).
All tasks in this manual are PSYOP-specific tasks. Officers will use this manual as a training instrument
and a self-evaluation tool. Commanders will use this manual to formulate professional development
programs for company grade officers on the basis of the unit critical mission-essential task list (METL).
Officers should attain a high level of proficiency in performing the tasks described in this publication.
Mastery of these tasks will lead to successful mission accomplishment.
iv
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
Preface
Appendix A provides a summary of duty positions and related training resources. Appendix B contains a
branch reading list. Information that officers gain from the reading list will broaden their horizons and give
them deeper insight to, understanding of, and appreciation for their leadership roles as Army officers.
To reduce safety hazards during training, trainers must identify and assess risks associated with the
missions as outlined in Field Manual (FM) 7-0, Training the Force.
This publication applies to the Active Army, the Army National Guard/Army National Guard of the United
States, and the United States Army Reserve unless otherwise stated.
The proponent for this publication is the United States Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center
and School (USAJFKSWCS). Send comments and recommendations on Department of the Army (DA)
Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms) directly to Commander,
USAJFKSWCS, ATTN: AOJK-DT-PO, Fort Bragg, NC 28310-5000.
Unless this publication states otherwise, masculine nouns and pronouns do not refer exclusively to men.
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
1-1. General. This manual is the first OFS for PSYOP. It is specifically designed to support the
establishment of the PSYOP branch. This OFS identifies the individual requirements for company grade
officers serving as 37As in the PSYOP branch. The OFS describes operations-based individual tasks
required of all PSYOP officers at the detachment/company level. For the new PSYOP captain, this
manual serves as the primary reference and base document to support further self-development and
sustain career progression in the PSYOP branch. In addition, this OFS provides former PSYOP career
field designated majors and lieutenant colonels, previously assigned to PSYOP positions, with a standard
reference of critical tasks for all Branch 37 officers.
1-2. Background. Officer foundation standards are the Armys primary standards for integrating the
officer leader development efforts of school commandants, commanders, and individual officers. The goal
of the system is to provide the Army with officers ready to accomplish their branch specific individual and
collective tasks across the range of military operations and prepare them for promotion.
a. The Army school system, the unit commander, and the individual officer share leader
development responsibilities under the OFS. School system personnel must identify tasks that officers
are to perform at a particular level. They must clearly articulate these specific branch requirements to train
the officers and/or provide training material that will enable them to perform their duties. Unit commanders
must provide an environment in which officers can refine their skills and grow professionally.
Commanders use the mission METLs of their units to focus his/her leader development programs. The
individual officer, however, is ultimately responsible for their own professional development.
b. The OFS system uses manuals to convey its training strategy. These manuals include relevant
information formatted into tasks with battle-focused conditions, standards, and performance measures.
The manuals also prescribe educational requirements to improve cognitive skills.
c. The captain tasks in this OFS branch manual have been derived through the systems approach
to training (SAT). The SAT requires USAJFKSWCS instructors and PSYOP subject matter experts to
follow the analysis process that identifies individual officer tasks for a particular job or position.
1-3. Professional Development. The OFS tasks to be trained and sustained in the unit form the basis of
the unit officer leader development program. Each unit leader development program should incorporate
the enclosed OFS reading programa part of the professional military education component. This list is
provided as a guideline of foundations readings and is not intended to be all inclusive. The reading
program supports individual intellectual growth by fostering an interest in reading about military-related
topics and by encouraging officers to exchange ideas on ethical and historical issues. Branch-specific
publications address topics of unique interest to a particular branch.
1-4. PSYOP Branch Application. This manual describes the critical tasks which all captains must
master. It has been designed to support and complement resident instruction received in the POQC.
Since all PSYOP units can directly support conventional forces throughout the range of military
operations, each PSYOP officer must retain the company-level conventional skills developed in his
accession branch.
As some PSYOP units are regionally oriented, the specific operational focus of the assigned unit may
vary, and therefore the application of the OFS must be relevant to the area of operations in which PSYOP
will be executed. The reader must be ready to adapt the critical tasks outlined in the OFS to the METL
and/or commander's intent of the support unit/activity. The trainer must be ready to help junior officers
articulate and prepare to creatively apply OFS standards to whatever operational environment the
PSYOP officer may be facing. This includes PSYOP support to conventional units, Army Special
Operations Forces (ARSOF) units, special mission units, joint headquarters, and other government
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
1-1
Chapter 1
agencies such as the Department of State. These requirements need to be part of a PSYOP officers
professional education, and must be incorporated into his/her self-development program.
1-2
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
CHAPTER 2
Trainers Guide
2-1. General. The military occupational specialty (MOS) training plan (MTP) identifies the essential
components of a unit training plan for individual training. Units have different training needs and
requirements based on differences in environment, location, equipment, dispersion, and similar factors.
Therefore, the MTP should be used as a guide for conducting unit training and not a rigid standard. The
MTP consists of two parts. Each part is designed to assist the commander in preparing a unit training
plan which satisfies integration, cross training, training up, and sustainment training requirements for
Soldiers in this MOS.
a. Part One of the MTP shows the relationship of an MOS skill level between duty position and
critical tasks. These critical tasks are grouped by task commonality into subject areas.
(1)
Section I lists subject area numbers and titles used throughout the MTP. These subject
areas are used to define the training requirements for each duty position within an MOS.
(2)
Section II identifies the total training requirement for each duty position within an MOS
and provides a recommendation for cross training and train-up/merger training.
Duty Position Column. This column lists the duty positions of the MOS, by skill
level, which have different training requirements.
Subject Area Column. This column lists, by numerical key (see Section I), the
subject areas a Soldier must be proficient in to perform in that duty position.
Cross Train Column. This column lists the recommended duty position for which
Soldiers should be cross trained.
Train-up/Merger Column. This column lists the corresponding duty position for the
next-higher skill level or military occupational specialty code (MOSC) the Soldier will
merge into on promotion.
b. Part Two lists, by general subject areas, the critical tasks to be trained in an MOS and the type
of training required (resident, integration, or sustainment).
Subject Area Column. This column lists the subject area number and title in the same
order as Section I, Part One of the MTP.
Task Number Column. This column lists the task numbers for all tasks included in the
subject area.
Title Column. This column lists the task title for each task in the subject area.
Training Location Column. This column identifies the training location where the task is
first trained to Soldier training publications standards. If the task is first trained to standard
in the unit, the word Unit will be in this column. If the task is first trained to standard in the
training base, it will identify, by brevity code (ANCOC, BNCOC, and so on), the resident
course where the task was taught. Figure 2-1, page 2-2, contains a list of training locations
and their corresponding brevity codes.
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
2-1
Chapter 2
Sustainment Training Skill Level Column. This column lists the skill levels of the MOS
for which Soldiers must receive sustainment training to ensure they maintain proficiency to
Soldiers manual standards.
Title
Training
Location
Sustainment
Training
Frequency
Sustainment
Training Skill
Level
Skill Level 9
Subject Area 1: Staff Planning and Operations
331-37A-0308
POQC
QT
03/04
331-37A-0338
POQC
QT
03/04
331-37A-0339
POQC
QT
03/04
2-2
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
Trainers Guide
CRITICAL TASKS
Task Number
Title
Training
Location
Sustainment
Training
Frequency
Sustainment
Training Skill
Level
331-37A-0340
POQC
QT
03/04
331-37A-0341
POQC
QT
03/04
331-37A-0342
POQC
QT
03/04
331-37A-0343
POQC
QT
03/04
331-37A-0350
POQC
QT
03/04
331-37A-0351
POQC
QT
03/04
331-37A-0353
POQC
QT
03/04
331-37A-0344
POQC
QT
03/04
331-37A-0354
POQC
QT
03/04
POQC
QT
03/04
331-37A-0445
POQC
QT
03/04
331-37A-0446
POQC
QT
03/04
331-37A-0447
POQC
QT
03/04
331-37A-0449
POQC
QT
03/04
331-37A-0476
POQC
QT
03/04
331-37A-0477
POQC
QT
03/04
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
2-3
Chapter 2
CRITIAL TASKS
Task Number
331-37A-0490
Title
Training
Location
Sustainment
Training
Frequency
Sustainment
Training Skill
Level
POQC
QT
03/04
2-4
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
CHAPTER 3
MOS/Skill Level Tasks
Skill Level 9
Subject Area 1: Staff Planning and Operations
Perform Psychological Operations Staff Officer
Duties, Responsibilities, and Functions
331-37A-0308
Conditions: Given a requirement to perform the basic duties of a PSYOP officer to a supported unit staff.
Standards: Plan and coordinate PSYOP for the supported unit; integrate with other staff elements;
perform staff and liaison responsibilities and functions; advise the commander and staff on the
capabilities, limitations, and employment of PSYOP forces; assess PSYOP training requirements for the
supported staff.
Performance Steps
1. Perform the major duties of a PSYOP officer in support of the unit staff.
a. Discuss planning considerations.
b. Establish lines of coordination.
c. Identify targeting considerations.
d. Advise the commander on PSYOP enablers in support of mission objectives.
e. Identify training considerations.
2. Perform PSYOP officer responsibilities and functions in support of the unit staff.
a. Apply special operations imperatives in PSYOP mission planning and execution.
b. Assist and make recommendations to the commander and staff on PSYOP matters and
requirements.
c. Conduct mission analysis and the PSYOP portion of the intelligence preparation of the battlefield
(IPB).
d. Advise the commander and unit staff on the psychological impact of operations other than
PSYOP.
e. Prepare the appropriate PSYOP portions of the contingency plan (CONPLAN), operation plan
(OPLAN), and operation order (OPORD).
f. Coordinate with supporting PSYOP units.
g. Recommend PSYOP information requirements to the J-2/G-2 and the J-3/G-3.
h. Nominate targets for lethal and nonlethal fires.
i. Recommend psychological actions (PSYACT) and agents of action to achieve a Psychological
Operations objective (PO).
j. Recommend refinements and updates to the POs and the supporting Psychological Operations
objectives (SPOs) during planning. (This is done when the supported unit is the highest element
in the mission, otherwise this will come from higher headquarters [HQ].)
k. Integrate directly with the J-3/G-3 or J-7/G-7 staff and ensure PSYOP inclusion and integration.
l. Maintain communications with the PSYOP task force HQ.
m. Review the CONPLAN/OPLAN and participate in the deliberate and crisis action planning.
n. With the J-2/G-2 of the unit, evaluate the effectiveness of PSYOP on the target audiences (TAs).
3. Perform liaison officer functions (as applicable).
a. Monitor.
b. Advise.
c. Coordinate.
d. Assist.
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-1
Chapter 3
Evaluation Preparation: Setup: Provide the officer with adequate training and testing facilities, sufficient
time to review the task materials, pencil, paper, and needed resources. If computers are used for the
evaluation, ensure they have connectivity to the Internet and that target websites are up. If SECRET
Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNET) access is notional for an evaluation, provide a hard copy
product clearly marked to show that is actually UNCLASSIFIED, for example, CLASSIFIED FOR
TRAINING ONLY, UNCLASSIFIED SAMPLE, or CLASSIFICATION MARKINGS FOR TRAINING
PURPOSES ONLY. If classified sources are used, ensure SIPRNET connectivity and a secure
training site.
Performance Measures
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
GO
NO-GO
Evaluation Guidance: Score the officer GO if all performance measures are passed. Score the officer
NO-GO if any performance measure is failed. If the officer scores NO-GO, show the officer what was
done wrong and how to do it correctly.
References
Required
FM 3-05.301
3-2
Related
FM 3-13
FM 5-0
FM 6-0
JP 3-0
JP 3-53
JP 5-0
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-3
Chapter 3
d. Assumptions. State assumption about the PSYOP situation regardless of the COA. (For example,
Assumption: Enemy propaganda broadcast facilities will be destroyed by friendly forces not later
than [NLT] D+2.)
4. Conduct COA analysis.
a. List evaluation criteria determined by staff for COA supportability to be used in COA analysis and
comparison.
b. Analyze each COA from the PSYOP point of view to determine its advantages and disadvantages
for conducting supporting PSYOP activities.
Note. Throughout the analysis, the PSYOP officer/noncommissioned officer (NCO) must keep PSYOP
considerations foremost in his mind. The analysis is not intended to produce a decision but to ensure that
all applicable PSYOP factors have been considered and that they form the basis for steps 5 and 6.
5. Compare COAs.
a. Compare the proposed COAs to determine the one that offers the best chance of success from
the PSYOP point of view. List the advantages and disadvantages of each COA affecting PSYOP.
A decision matrix visually supports a comparison.
b. Develop and compare methods of overcoming disadvantages, if any, in each COA.
c. State a general conclusion on the COA that offers the best chance of success for PSYOP.
6. Finalize the PSYOP estimate.
7. Submit recommendations and conclusions to the appropriate unit staff, agency, or organization.
a. Recommend COA based on comparison (most supportable from the PSYOP perspective).
b. Rank COAs from best to worst.
c. List issues, deficiencies, and risk for each COA, with recommendations to reduce their impact.
Evaluation Preparation: Setup: Provide the officer with adequate training and testing facilities, sufficient
time to review the task materials, pencil, paper, and needed resources. If computers are used for the
evaluation, ensure they have connectivity to the Internet and that target websites are up. If SECRET
Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNET) access is notional for an evaluation, provide a hard copy
product clearly marked to show that is actually UNCLASSIFIED, for example, CLASSIFIED FOR
TRAINING ONLY, UNCLASSIFIED SAMPLE, or CLASSIFICATION MARKINGS FOR TRAINING
PURPOSES ONLY. If classified sources are used, ensure SIPRNET connectivity and a secure
training site.
Performance Measures
GO
NO-GO
1. Listed references.
2. Wrote the mission paragraph.
3. Wrote the situation and consideration paragraph.
a. Listed the characteristics of the AO.
b. Identified key target sets.
c. Identified friendly forces.
d. Stated assumption about the PSYOP situation
regardless of the COA.
4. Conducted COA analysis.
5. Compared the COAs.
a. Listed the advantages and disadvantages
of each COA affecting PSYOP.
b. Developed and compared methods of overcoming
disadvantages.
c. Stated a general conclusion on the COA that offers
the best chance of success for PSYOP.
6. Finalized the PSYOP estimate.
7. Submitted recommendations and conclusions to the
appropriate unit staff, agency, or organization.
Evaluation Guidance: Score the officer GO if all performance measures are passed. Score the officer
NO-GO if any performance measure is failed. If the officer scores NO-GO, show the officer what was
done wrong and how to do it correctly.
3-4
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
2 July 2007
Related
FM 3-05
FM 5-0
JP 3-0
JP 5-0
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-5
Chapter 3
3-6
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-7
Chapter 3
3-8
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
GO
NO-GO
1. Listed references.
a. Higher-headquarters plan.
b. PSYOP estimate.
c. Any message traffic that generated the planning effort.
2. Wrote the situation paragraph.
a. Described the general situation.
b. Described neutral perspectives.
c. Described enemy perspectives.
3. Wrote the mission paragraph using the restated
PSYOP mission statement from MDMP step 2.
4. Wrote the concept of the operation.
a. Addressed the level of PSYOP support.
b. Explained tasks and POs.
c. Denoted PSYOP locations and linkups.
d. Determined PSYOP programs by phase.
e. Provided valid PSYOP themes and objectives
to be avoided, discouraged, and stressed.
f. Provided description of the cultural and psychological
characteristics of the PTAs.
g. Provided description of propaganda directed at U.S.
personnel and foreign groups in the AO.
h. Described how intelligence, counterintelligence,
security monitoring, and operational feedback is provided.
i. Stated requirements for running situation estimates.
j. Identified resources and availability.
k. Listed coordinating instructions pertaining to two
or more elements of the task organization.
l. Outlined coordination with adjacent commands and
civilian agencies.
m. Outlined important information coordinated in committees.
n. Outlined coordination lines between supported command
and components and subordinate units.
o. Ensured tasks clearly establish responsibilities.
p. Provided for print production as required.
5. Wrote the administration and logistics paragraph.
a. Addressed financial, morale, welfare, medical, dental,
postal, legal, graves registration, and religious support.
b. Addressed coordination with supply and maintenance
representatives.
6. Wrote command and control paragraph.
a. Identified command relationships.
b. Stated PSYOP approval authority.
c. Stated PSYOP dissemination authority.
Evaluation Guidance: Score the officer GO if all performance measures are passed. Score the officer
NO-GO if any performance measure is failed. If the officer scores NO-GO, show the officer what was
done wrong and how to do it correctly.
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-9
Chapter 3
References
Required
FM 3-05.301
3-10
Related
FM 3-0
FM 3-05.30
FM 3-05.302
FM 5-0
JP 3-0
JP 3-53
JP 5-0
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-11
Chapter 3
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
3-12
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
GO
NO-GO
Evaluation Guidance: Score the officer GO if all performance measures are passed. Score the officer
NO-GO if any performance measure is failed. If the officer scores NO-GO, show the officer what was
done wrong and how to do it correctly.
References
Required
FM 3-05.301
2 July 2007
Related
FM 2-0
FM 3-05.30
FM 5-0
JP 2-0
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-13
Chapter 3
GO
NO-GO
3-14
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
Integrated interpreters.
Ensured TPTs conducted team drills IAW unit TACSOP.
Deployed TPTs IAW PSYOP appendix task organization paragraph.
Participated in unit rehearsals.
Monitored TPTs actions and submitted reports to appropriate
headquarters.
9. Produced changes to appendix as needed.
Evaluation Guidance: Score the officer GO if all performance measures are passed. Score the officer
NO-GO if any performance measure is failed. If the officer scores NO-GO, show the officer what was
done wrong and how to do it correctly.
References
Required
FM 3-05.301
2 July 2007
Related
FM 3-0
FM 3-05.302
FM 7-8
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-15
Chapter 3
GO
NO-GO
Evaluation Guidance: Score the officer GO if all performance measures are passed. Score the officer
NO-GO if any performance measure is failed. If the officer scores NO-GO, show the officer what was
done wrong and how to do it correctly.
3-16
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
References
Required
FM 3-05.301
2 July 2007
Related
FM 3-05.302
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-17
Chapter 3
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Evaluation Preparation: Setup: Provide the officer with adequate training and testing facilities, sufficient
time to review the task materials, pencil, paper, and needed resources. If computers are used for the
evaluation, ensure they have connectivity to the Internet and that target websites are up. If SECRET
3-18
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
GO
NO-GO
Evaluation Guidance: Score the officer GO if all performance measures are passed. Score the officer
NO-GO if any performance measure is failed. If the officer scores NO-GO, show the officer what was
done wrong and how to do it correctly.
References
Required
FM 3-05.30
2 July 2007
Related
FM 3-05.301
JP 3-53
Special Psychological Operations (PSYOP) Assessment
Special Psychological Operations (PSYOP) Study
Military Capabilities Study
Theater Security Cooperation Plan
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-19
Chapter 3
3-20
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
Determine specified (specifically assigned), implied (not stated but must be accomplished), and
essential (must be executed to accomplish the mission) tasks.
(1) Derive specified tasks from the higher-headquarters order.
(2) Analyze specified tasks to derive implied tasks.
d. Begin development of POs, SPOs, and PTAL.
e. Review available assets (for example, PSYOP unit, supported unit, other PSYOP assets, and
host-nation assets) and compare assets to mission requirements. Submit requests for additional
PSYOP forces as needed (for example, combat mission needs statement [CMNS], statement of
requirements [SORs]). Information from this step is applied to section c (Friendly Forces) of the
PSYOP estimate.
f. Determine PSYOP constraints (for example, resources required to do something and prohibited
actions such as themes to avoid), both supported unit and higher PSYOP unit imposed.
g. Identify critical facts and assumptions: target audiences (TAs), PSYOP force vulnerabilities,
PSYOP force capabilities, and other PSYOP-specific information.
h. Conduct risk assessment.
(1) Identify risk associated with the environment and military operations.
(2) Identify inherent risks associated with the mission type (PSYOP actions and arguments).
i. Determine information requirements (IRs) and initial priority intelligence requirements (PIRs) for
PSYOP and provide input to the units friendly forces information requirements (FFIRs) and
commanders critical information requirements (CCIR).
(1) Identify intelligence gaps important to PSYOP mission accomplishment and develop IRs to
address these shortcomings.
(2) Identify friendly force assessment (for example, operation summaries [OPSUMs], SPOT
reports, and subordinate assessments), threat force assessment (for example, intelligence
summaries [INTSUMs], tactical human intelligence [HUMINT] team reports, and J-2/G-2/S-2
assessments), and third-party assessment (for example, polling, civil affairs assessments,
tactical PSYOP team reports, and subordinate assessments) to support PSYOP assessment.
j. Provide PSYOP input into the units initial reconnaissance annex based on previously identified
IRs, that include PSYOP initial assessment criteria developed concurrently with POs and SPOs.
k. Plan use of available time.
(1) Determine the predeployment timeline of the unit.
(2) Determine long lead-time tasks such as psychological actions (PSYACT) and product
development and approval. Provide PSYOP input into the units timeline.
l. Write the PSYOP restated mission.
(1) Who, what, when, where, why.
(2) POs and SPOs.
m. Conduct/take part in the mission analysis briefing in accordance with the supported unit standing
operating procedure (SOP). Provide early mission analysis input to the J-3/G-3/S-3.
n. Obtain supported commanders approval for the PSYOP mission.
o. Assist in the development of the supported commanders initial intent.
(1) Incorporate into the commanders initial intent what PSYOP must do (key tasks) to support
the unit.
(2) Provide input into the commanders intent in the base order.
p. Receive the commanders guidance for PSYOP.
(1) Issue the WARNORD to subordinate units.
(2) Mission.
(3) Situation.
(4) General instructions.
(5) Special instructions.
(6) Review facts and assumptions for PSYOP.
3. Conduct Step 3 of MDMP: COA Development.
a. Analyze relative combat power.
(1) Determine where and what PSYOP to conduct in order to achieve the mission objectives.
(2) Determine where and what PSYOP to conduct in order to counter enemy propaganda
actions.
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-21
Chapter 3
(3) Analyze psychological impact of proposed supported unit actions on multiple TA in the area
of operations (AO).
b. Generate options. Determine how to employ PSYOP to support the COA.
c. Array initial forces. Determine PSYOP forces for each task, other units tasked with PSYOP
actions, and security for PSYOP units.
d. Develop scheme of maneuver. Determine how arrayed forces will accomplish the commanders
intent for PSYOP.
e. Task organize PSYOP forces (assign headquarters) to properly support the COA.
f. Prepare COA statements and graphic sketches to articulate the commanders intent for PSYOP,
mission, and end state.
4. Conduct Step 4 of the MDMP: COA Analysis. Information from this step of the MDMP is applied to
section 3 (Analysis of COAs) of the PSYOP estimate.
a. Synchronize PSYOP with the supported unit plan and war game PSYOP concept of support
against how the enemy will conduct propaganda operations.
b. Gather the tools (IPB products to include; key target sets overlay, weather impact overlay, terrain
impact overlay, media infrastructure overlay).
c. List all friendly forces.
d. List assumptions.
e. List known critical events and decision points.
f. Determine evaluation criteria for COA comparison (example, Psychological impact and risk).
g. Select war game method.
h. War game the battle and assess results.
5. Conduct Step 5 of the MDMP: COA Comparison. Information from this step of the MDMP is applied to
section 4 (Comparison of COAs) of the PSYOP estimate.
a. Analyze advantages and disadvantages of each COA from a PSYOP perspective.
b. Construct a matrix to compare each COA based upon the evaluation criteria.
c. Weight each of the evaluation criteria by degree of importance to PSYOP.
d. Determine which COA PSYOP can best support, achieves POs, poses the minimum risk to
Soldiers and equipment, best positions the unit for future operations, and provides the best
flexibility to meet unexpected events during execution. Information from this step of the MDMP is
applied to section 5 (Recommendations and Conclusions) of the PSYOP estimate.
6. Conduct Step 6 of the MDMP: COA Approval.
a. Finalize PSYOP support, POs, SPOs, PTAL, and PSYOP execution and synchronization
matrixes.
b. Receive any additional guidance from the commander.
Note. Upon completion of Step 6 of the MDMP the PSYOP estimate is complete.
7. Conduct Step 7 of the MDMP: Operations Order Production.
a. Refine PSYOP support to the COA.
b. Produce PSYOP appendix/tab derived from COA.
c. Commander reviews and approves PSYOP appendix/tab.
d. PSYOP appendix/tab issued as part of the unit OPORD.
Evaluation Preparation: Setup: Provide the officer with adequate training and testing facilities, sufficient
time to review the task materials, pencil, paper, and needed resources. If computers are used for the
evaluation, ensure they have connectivity to the Internet and that target websites are up. If SECRET
Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNET) access is notional for an evaluation, provide a hard copy
product clearly marked to show that is actually UNCLASSIFIED, for example, CLASSIFIED FOR
TRAINING ONLY, UNCLASSIFIED SAMPLE, or CLASSIFICATION MARKINGS FOR TRAINING
PURPOSES ONLY. If classified sources are used, ensure SIPRNET connectivity and a secure
training site.
3-22
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
GO
NO-GO
Evaluation Guidance: Score the officer GO if all performance measures are passed. Score the officer
NO-GO if any performance measure is failed. If the officer scores NO-GO, show the officer what was
done wrong and how to do it correctly.
References
Required
FM 3-05.301
2 July 2007
Related
FM 3-05.30
FM 3-05.302
FM 5-0
JP 3-53
Country Plan
Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan, 18 July 2003
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-23
Chapter 3
3-24
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
Select the first product requiring external execution support from the SEM.
Determine the what and include the quantity (for example, deliver 1.3 million leaflets).
Determine the where in terms of the grid coordinates or target name.
Determine the when in terms of the date-time group or D-plus or -minus (for example, D+7 or H-2).
Determine the why (for example, in order to persuade by disrupting radio station operations or in
order to disrupt repair of previously destroyed targets).
6. Write the PTO including the what, where, when, and why.
Evaluation Preparation: Setup: Provide the officer with adequate training and testing facilities, sufficient
time to review the task materials, pencil, paper, and needed resources. If computers are used for the
evaluation, ensure they have connectivity to the Internet and that target websites are up. If SECRET
Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNET) access is notional for an evaluation, provide a hard copy
product clearly marked to show that is actually UNCLASSIFIED, for example, CLASSIFIED FOR
TRAINING ONLY, UNCLASSIFIED SAMPLE, or CLASSIFICATION MARKINGS FOR TRAINING
PURPOSES ONLY. If classified sources are used, ensure SIPRNET connectivity and a secure
training site.
Performance Measures
1. Selected the first product requiring external execution support
from the SEM.
2. Determined the what and included the quantity.
3. Determined the where in terms of the grid coordinates or target
name.
4. Determined the when in terms of the date-time group or D-plus
or -minus.
5. Determined the why.
6. Wrote the PTO including the what, where, when, and why.
GO
NO-GO
Evaluation Guidance: Score the officer GO if all performance measures are passed. Score the officer
NO-GO if any performance measure is failed. If the officer scores NO-GO, show the officer what was
done wrong and how to do it correctly.
References
Required
FM 3-05.301
2 July 2007
Related
FM 3-05.30
FM 5-0
FM 6-20-10
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-25
Chapter 3
GO
NO-GO
3-26
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
Evaluation Guidance: Score the officer GO if all performance measures are passed. Score the officer
NO-GO if any performance measure is failed. If the officer scores NO-GO, show the officer what was
done wrong and how to do it correctly.
References
Required
FM 3-05.301
2 July 2007
Related
FM 2-0
FM 34-130
FM 3-05.102
FM 3-05.30
JP 2-01.3
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-27
Chapter 3
GO
NO-GO
3-28
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Location.
Execution timeframe.
Effect (the desired behavior).
Duration of effect.
Intent of action (commanders intent for the operation).
Described how PSYACT relates to the arguments
and has a synergistic effect when executed with the rest
of the series to elicit the desired effect.
Listed aspects of execution that have primary or secondary
psychological effects on the TA that are detractors or enablers.
Listed potential unintended consequences of PSYACT.
Entered any related product/action concepts from the series.
Submitted the PAW along with the SCW, SEM, and SDW to the
company commander for review and approval.
Briefed the supported units S-3 on the PSYACT concept.
Obtained supported unit commanders approval for the
PSYACT.
Evaluation Guidance: Score the officer GO if all performance measures are passed. Score the officer
NO-GO if any performance measure is failed. If the officer scores NO-GO, show the officer what was
done wrong and how to do it correctly.
References
Required
FM 3-05.301
2 July 2007
Related
FM 3-05.302
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-29
Chapter 3
GO
NO-GO
Evaluation Guidance: Score the officer GO if all performance measures are passed. Score the officer
NO-GO if any performance measure is failed. If the officer scores NO-GO, show the officer what was
done wrong and how to do it correctly.
References
Required
FM 3-05.301
3-30
Related
FM 3-05.302
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-31
Chapter 3
GO
NO-GO
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
3-32
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
Evaluation Guidance: Score the officer GO if all performance measures are passed. Score the officer
NO-GO if any performance measure is failed. If the officer scores NO-GO, show the officer what was
done wrong and how to do it correctly.
References
Required
FM 3-05.301
2 July 2007
Related
FM 3-05.302
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-33
Chapter 3
GO
NO-GO
Evaluation Guidance: Score the officer GO if all performance measures are passed. Score the officer
NO-GO if any performance measure is failed. If the officer scores NO-GO, show the officer what was
done wrong and how to do it correctly.
REFERENCES
Required
FM 3-05.301
3-34
Related
FM 5-0
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
GO
NO-GO
Evaluation Guidance: Score the officer GO if all performance measures are passed. Score the officer
NO-GO if any performance measure is failed. If the officer scores NO-GO, show the officer what was
done wrong and how to do it correctly.
References
Required
FM 3-05.301
2 July 2007
Related
FM 5-0
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-35
Chapter 3
GO
NO-GO
3-36
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
Evaluation Guidance: Score the officer GO if all performance measures are passed. Score the officer
NO-GO if any performance measure is failed. If the officer scores NO-GO, show the officer what was
done wrong and how to do it correctly.
References
Required
FM 3-05.301
2 July 2007
Related
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-37
Chapter 3
GO
NO-GO
3-38
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
Evaluation Guidance: Score the officer GO if all performance measures are passed. Score the officer
NO-GO if any performance measure is failed. If the officer scores NO-GO, show the officer what was
done wrong and how to do it correctly.
References
Required
FM 3-05.301
2 July 2007
Related
FM 3-05.302
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-39
Chapter 3
3-40
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
GO
NO-GO
Evaluation Guidance: Score the officer GO if all performance measures are passed. Score the officer
NO-GO if any performance measure is failed. If the officer scores NO-GO, show the officer what was
done wrong and how to do it correctly.
References
Required
FM 3-05.301
2 July 2007
Related
FM 3-05.302
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-41
Chapter 3
GO
NO-GO
3-42
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
Evaluation Guidance: Score the officer GO if all performance measures are passed. Score the officer
NO-GO if any performance measure is failed. If the officer scores NO-GO, show the officer what was
done wrong and how to do it correctly.
References
Required
FM 3-05.301
2 July 2007
Related
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-43
Chapter 3
GO
NO-GO
3-44
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
e. Period of evaluation.
f. Date of report.
Wrote statement summarizing evaluation results.
a. Execution timeline.
b. TA.
c. Media types.
d. Dissemination area.
Documented behavior trends for the targeted behavior
a. Exposure.
b. Understanding.
c. Acceptance.
Wrote conclusions.
Evaluation Guidance: Score the officer GO if all performance measures are passed. Score the officer
NO-GO if any performance measure is failed. If the officer scores NO-GO, show the officer what was
done wrong and how to do it correctly.
References
Required
FM 3-05.301
2 July 2007
Related
FM 3-05.302
STP 33-37II-OFS
3-45
APPENDIX A
Specific Job Summaries and Resources
1. General. Psychological Operations (PSYOP) officers should complete normal education and training
requirements to advance and develop themselves professionally and personally. Professional
development for captains involves the typical duty positions listed below:
a. PSYOP Captain.
(1) PSYOP Officer.
(2) PSYOP Staff Officer.
(3) Detachment Commander.
(4) PSYOP Support Element (PSE) officer in charge (OIC).
(5) PSYOP Company Executive Officer (XO).
(6) PSYOP Instructor.
(7) Battalion Assistant S-3.
(8) Brigade Combat Team (BCT) Information Operations (IO) Officer/S-7.
b. PSYOP Major.
(1) Regional Support Company Commander.
(2) Tactical PSYOP Company Commander.
(3) Psychological Operations Development Detachment Commander.
(4) Battalion XO.
(5) Battalion S-3.
(6) Group S-3.
(7) Group XO.
(8) Special Forces Group: PSYOP Staff Officer.
(9) Ranger Regiment: PSYOP Staff Officer.
(10) Division: Division PSYOP Officer.
(11) Group/Ranger Regiment/Division G-7/IO Officer
(12) Corps: Deputy Corps PSYOP Officer.
(13) Corps G-7/IO Officer
(14) Army: Army PSYOP Staff Officer.
(15) Combatant Commands (command authority) (COCOMs), Theater Special Operations
Commands (TSOCs), North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Joint Information
Operation Center (JIOC): Joint PSYOP Officer.
(16) Human Resources Command (HRC): PSYOP Career Manager.
(17) 1st IO Command: PSYOP Officer.
(18) USAJFKSWCS PSYOP Instructor.
(19) USAJFKSWCS PSYOP Chief of Training (Training/Doctrine Writer).
(20) USAJFKSWCS PSYOP Chief of Doctrine (Training/Doctrine Writer).
(21) USAJFKSWCS Officer Training Company Commander.
(22) Special Operations Recruiting Battalion Operations Officer.
(23) Joint Special Operations Command PSYOP Officer
(24) Other Agencies of the U.S. Government.
c. PSYOP Lieutenant Colonel.
(1) PSYOP Battalion Commander.
(2) PSYOP Group Deputy Commanding Officer (DCO).
(3) PSYOP Group XO.
(4) Corps PSYOP Staff Officer.
(5) Army PSYOP Staff Officer.
(6) PSYOP Branch Chief, Directorate of Special Operations Proponency.
(7) Joint: Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS), Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), NATO, JIOC,
Department of State.
(8) Chief, PSYOP Training and Doctrine Division.
(9) USASOC.
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
A-1
Appendix A
(10) USSOCOM.
(11) USARC.
(12) Combatant Commands.
d. PSYOP Colonel.
(1) PSYOP Group Commander.
(2) Joint: JCS, OSD, Department of State.
(3) Commander, Joint PSYOP Support Element (JPSE).
(4) Director, USASOC G-39.
(5) U.S. Army War College.
(6) USACPOC G-3.
(7) USACAPOC Chief of Staff.
(8) USSOCOM J39.
(9) Army Service Component Command: PSYOP Staff Officer
(10) Unified Combatant Command: PSYOP Staff Officer
(11) Corps G-7/IO Officer
2. Resources. PSYOP officers should use the references and resources normally available within the
unit and those used for resident and nonresident schooling. The non-inclusive list of reference
publications in this manual provides a ready source of information for further study and professional
development.
A-2
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
APPENDIX B
Branch Reading List
The branch reading list is provided for the convenience of the individual officer and his commander. When
commanders develop their unit reading programs, they should choose books or other reading material
that will support their critical METL, unit-training programs, and the professional development of their
officers. The intention of the branch reading list is to give the commander a starting point from which to
proceed with the development of a unit or individual reading program. This reading list is only a part of his
continuing professional education and development. The list is not all-inclusive, and officers are free to
choose other material that better fits their individual programs.
PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS BOOKS
Barnett, Frank R. (ed.) and others, Special Operations in U.S. Strategy, Washington, National Defense
University Press, 1984.
Erdmann, James M., Leaflet Operations in the Second World War. Denver, Denver Instant Printing, 1969.
Goldstein, Frank L. (Col., USAF) (ed.), Psychological Operations: Principles and Case Studies, Maxwell
AFB, AL, Air University Press, 1996. (Divided into four sections: 1) Nature and Scope of
Psychological Operations, 2) National Policy and PSYOP Planning, 3) Strategic, Tactical, and
Operational PSYOP, and 4) Case Studies of PSYOP Applications.)
Goldstein, Frank L. (Col., USAF) (ed.), Psychological Operations: A Plan for Success. pp 95-102.
Gordon, Joseph S. (ed.), Psychological Operations: The Soviet Challenge, Boulder, CO, Westview Press,
1988.
Hayden, H. T. (Lt. Col., USMC), Shadow War: Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict. Vista, CA,
Pacific Aero Press, 1992.
Kempe, Frederick, Divorcing the Dictator: Americas Bungled Affair with Noriega. New York, G.P. Putnam,
1990, Psychological Warfare, pp 350-368.
Margolin, Leo Jay, Paper Bullets: A Brief Story of Psychological Warfare in World War II. New York,
Froben Press, 1946.
McLaurin, Ron D. (ed.), Military Propaganda: Psychological Warfare and Operations. New York, Praeger,
1982.
Paddock, Alfred H., Jr., Psychological and Unconventional Warfare, 1941-1952: Origins of a Special
Warfare Capability for the United States Army. Carlisle Barracks, PA, 1979. (Army War College
[U.S.] Study project)
Paddock, Alfred H., Jr., Psychological Operations, Special Operations, and U.S. Strategy, pp 229-260.
Paddock, Alfred H., Jr., U.S. Army Special Warfare: Its Origins. Washington, National Defense University
Press, 1982. (Contains several chapters concerning psychological warfare during World War II,
the interwar years, and during the Korean conflict.)
Pease, Stephen E., Psywar: Psychological Warfare in Korea, 1950-1953. Harrisburg, PA, Stackpole
Books, 1992.
Political Warfare and Psychological Operations: Rethinking the U.S. Approach, Washington, National
Defense University Press, 1989, Military Psychological Operations, pp 45-75.
Radvanyi, Janos (ed.), Psychological Operations and Political Warfare in Long-Term Strategic Planning,
New York, Praeger, 1990.
Roetter, Charles, The Art of Psychological Warfare, 1914-1945, New York, Stein and Day, 1974.
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
B-1
Appendix B
B-2
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
B-3
Appendix B
Goodman, Glenn W., Jr., Getting the Word Out: Psychological Operations Play Key Role in Saving
Soldiers Lives, Armed Forces Journal International, Vol. 133, July 1996, p. 44.
Goodman, Glenn W., Jr., Rebuilding Bosnia: Army Civil Affairs and PSYOP Personnel Play Critical
Nonmilitary Role in Operation Joint Endeavor, Armed Forces Journal International, Vol. 134,
February 1997, pp. 22-23.
Jones, Jeffrey B. (Col., USA), Psychological Operations in Desert Shield, Desert Storm and Urban
Freedom, Special Warfare, Vol. 7, No.3, July 1994, pp. 22-29.
Jones, Jeffrey B. (Col.) and Michael P. Mathews (Lt. Col.), PSYOP (psychological operations) and the
Warfighting CINC (Commander in Chief), Joint Force Quarterly, No.8, Summer 1995, pp.28-33.
Kappelman, Paul B. (Lt. Col.) and Robert E. Armstrong (Maj.), PSYOP Task Force to JTF (Joint Task
Force) Andrew: A Case Study in Support to Disaster-Recovery Operations, Special Warfare,
Vol. 6, No. 3, July 1993, pp. 18-21.
Kempe, Frederick and Gerald F. Seib, U.K. Leaflets Urge Argentines to Surrender, Sec. 1, p. 2, Col. 2,
June 4, 1982.
Kilgore, Joe E. (Maj.), PSYOP in Support of Low-Intensity Conflict, Special Warfare, Vol. 5, No.2,
October 1992, pp. 26-31.
McIntire, Katherine and Neil Munro, Psyching Out the Enemy, Army Times, Vol. 54, February 28, 1994,
pp. 12-14.
McMichael, William H. (SSgt., USA), Mind Games (Psychological Operations in Operation Desert
Storm), Soldier, Vol. 47, May 1992, pp. 6-8.
Morrow, Janice M. (Capt.), Never Seen, Always Heard (the mission of the 193rd Special Operations
Group is Psychological Warfare), Airman, Vol. 37, February 1993, pp. 2-5.
Paddock, Alfred H., Jr., No More Tactical Information Detachments: U.S. Military Psychological
Operations in Transition, Low Intensity Conflict & Law Enforcement, Vol. 2, Autumn 1993,
pp.195-211.
Parker, Jay M., Training the PSYOP Force, Special Warfare, Vol. 5, No. 2, October 1992, pp. 2-5.
Rodgers, R. Scott (Maj., USAF), PSYOP: Most Powerful Non-Lethal Weapon System, Night Flyer
Magazine, Vol. 4, September 1996, p. 9.
Sandler, Stanley, Army Psywarriors: A History of U.S. Army Psychological Operations, Special Warfare,
Vol. 5, No. 2, October 1992, pp. 18-25. (Includes information on Operations URGENT FURY,
JUST CAUSE, and DESERT STORM.)
Stankiewicz (Lt. Col., USAF, Ret), PSYOP: Winning Wars by Saving Lives (PSYOP leaflets during Gulf
War), Asia-Pacific Defense Forum, Vol. 17, Winter 1992-1993, pp. 8-14.
Stech, Frank J. (Lt. Col.), Upheaval in Europe: PSYOP Communication Lessons Learned, Special
Warfare, Vol. 5, No. 2, October 1992, pp. 13-17.
Summe, Jack N. (Maj., USA), PSYOP Support to Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm. Special
Warfare, Vol. 5, No. 2, October 1992, pp. 6-9.
Summe, Jack N. (Maj., USA), Total PSYOP Integration: Reorganizing Active and Reserve-Component
PSYOP Forces, Special Warfare, Vol. 5, No. 2, October 1992, pp. 10-12.
Thomas, Timothy L., Russian Information - Psychological Actions: Implications for U.S. PSYOP, Special
Warfare, Vol. 10, No. 1, Winter 1997, pp. 12-19.
Timmes, Thomas A. (Col., USA, Ret), Military Psychological Operations in the 1990s, Special Warfare,
Vol. 7, No. 1, January 1994, pp. 19-21.
Van Zandt, Clinton R., When Forces Work Together: Army PSYOP and the FBI in St Croix, Special
Warfare, Vol. 6, No. 2, May 1993, pp. 24-25.
B-4
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
Wilson, D. J. (Capt., Australian Army), Psychological Operations in Somalia, Australian Defence Force
Journal, No.107, July-August 1994, pp. 35-42.
Middle East Suggested Reading
CULTURE
Patai, Raphael, The Arab Mind, Revised edition, 2002, Hatherleigh Press, Long Island, NY
Comar, Margaret K., Understanding Arabs: A Guide for Westerners, Nydell, 3d edition, Intercultural
Press, 2002, Yarmouth, ME.
HISTORY
Goldschmidt, Arthur Jr., A Concise History of the Middle East, 7th edition, Westview Press, 2002,
Boulder, CO.
PEOPLES
Bates, Daniel and Amal Rassam, Peoples and Cultures of the Middle East, 2d edition, Prentice Hall,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1983.
MILITARY
Rubin, Barry, and Thomas A. Keaney (ed.), Armed Forces in the Middle East: Politics and Strategy,
Frank Cass, London, 2002.
ISLAM
Esposito, John L., Islam: The Straight Path, revised 3d edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005.
ISLAMISM AND ISLAMIC TERROR
Lewis, Bernard, The Crisis of Islam: Holy War and Holy Terror, Modern Library, NY, 2003.
Lewis, Bernard, What Went Wrong: Western Impact and Middle East Response, Oxford University Press,
NY, 2002.
POLITICAL SCIENCE
Rubin, Barry, The Tragedy of the Middle East, Cambridge Press, 2001.
Bill, James A. and Robert Springburg, Politics in the Middle East, 5th edition, Addison Wesley, Longman
Inc., NY, 2000.
Cohen, Michael J., Arab-Israeli Conflict: The Origins and Evolution of the Arab Zionist Conflict, University
of Berkeley Press, 1987.
IRAQ
Marr, Phebe, Modern History of Iraq, Westview Press, 2d edition, 2003.
Braude, Joseph, The New Iraq: Rebuilding the Country, Basic Books, NY, 2003.
Gunter, Michael M., The Kurds of Iraq: Tragedy and Hope, St. Martins Press, 1992 (out of print).
Chaliand, Gerard, A People Without a Country: Kurds and Kurdistan, Interlink Publishers, Northampton,
Massachusetts, 2004.
Nakash, Y., The Shias of Iraq, Princeton University Press, 2003.
IRAN
Rubin, Barry, Paved with Good Intentions: The American Experience in Iran, London, Penguin Books
reprint, 1984.
Keddie, Nikki R., Roots of Revolution: An Interpretive History of Modern Iran, New Haven, Yale University
Press, 1981.
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
B-5
Appendix B
Fuller, Graham E., The Center of the Universe: The Geopolitics of Iran, Boulder, CO, Westview Press,
1991.
AFGHANISTAN
Vogelsang, Willem, The Afghan, Peoples of Asia, Blackwell Publishing, 2001.
Hopkirk, Peter, The Great Game: The Struggle for Empire in Central Asia, (hard to find).
Rashid, Ahmed, Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia, 2001.
Goodson, Larry, Afghanistans Endless Wars: State Failure, Regional Politics and the Rise of the Taliban,
2002.
Dupree, Louis, Afghanistan, 1973. (Out of print; but available; essential historical reading.)
TERRORISM
Howard, Russell D. and Reed L. Sawyer, Defeating Terrorism: Shaping the New Environment,
McGraw Hill, 2002.
Howard, Russell D. and Reed L. Sawyer, Terrorism and Counterterrorism: Understanding the New
Security Environment, McGraw Hill, 2002.
PSYCHOLOGY and PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS
Cialdini, Robert B., Ph.D., Influence, Quill, NY, 1993.
Grossman, David, On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society, Boston:
Little, Brown and Co, 1996.
Lakoff, George, Don't Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate, Chelsea Green
Publishing, 2004.
Milgram, Stanley, Obedience to Authority, Harper Perennial, 1983.
Pratkanis, Anthony and Elliott Aronson, Age of Propaganda: The Everyday Use and Abuse of Persuasion,
New York: W.H. Freeman, 1991.
Roberts, (Wheezy), M.E., Villages of the Moon: Psychological Operations in Southern Afghanistan,
Baltimore, Publish America, 2005.
Winn, Denise, The Manipulated Mind: Brainwashing, Conditioning, and Indoctrination, Malor Books, 2000.
B-6
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
GLOSSARY
Section I
Acronyms & Abbreviations
AMHS
AN
annually
ANCOC
AO
area of operations
AR
Army regulation
ARSOF
BA
biannually
BNCOC
BPS
BW
biweekly
C/E
CCIR
CI
counterintelligence
CMNS
COA
course of action
COCOM
DA
DA Form
DC
DCO
DD Form
DMS
DOD
Department of Defense
DP
decision point
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
Glossary-1
Glossary
EPW
FDO
FFIR
FM
FOLS
family of loudspeakers
FRAGO
fragmentary order
HRC
G-1
G-2
G-3
G-4
G-6
G-7
GENTEXT
general text
HN
host nation
HQ
headquarters
HUMINT
human intelligence
IAW
in accordance with
ICC
IIP
INTSUM
intelligence summary
IO
information operations
IPB
IR
information requirement
J-1
J-2
Intelligence Directorate
J-3
Operations Directorate
Glossary-2
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
Glossary
J-4
Logistics Directorate
J-5
J-6
J-7
JCS
JFC
JIOC
JTF
MBITR
MDMP
MEDCAP
METL
MILGRP
military group
MO
MOS
MOSC
MTP
NATO
NCO
noncommissioned officer
NLT
OFS
OGA
OIC
officer in charge
OPLAN
operation plan
OPORD
operation order
OPSEC
operations security
OPSUM
operations summary
OSD
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
Glossary-3
Glossary
PAW
PDSS
PIR
PLL
PO
POLMIL
political-military
POQC
POTF
PSE
PSYACT
psychological actions
PSYOP
Psychological Operations
PTA
PTAL
PTM
PTO
QT
quarterly
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-8
S-9
SA
SAT
SCW
Glossary-4
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
Glossary
SDW
SEM
SIPR
SIPRNET
SM
Soldiers manual
SMCT
SOF
SOP
SOR
SPA
SPO
SPOTREP
SPOT report
STP
SPS
SSD
TA
TAA
TAAD
TAAW
TACSOP
TM
TPD
TPDD
TPT
TSOC
TV
television
U.S
United States
UAS
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
Glossary-5
Glossary
USAJFKSWC
WARNORD
warning order
wk
weekly
Section II
Terms
accessibility
The availability of an audience for targeting by Psychological Operations.
agents of action
Persons and organizations who carry out or conduct programs of psychological actions. Discretionary
Persons or organizations whose activities are planned primarily for their psychological impact.
IncidentalPersons or organizations whose activities generate a psychological impact secondary to the
military operation.
basic Psychological Operations study
A document that describes succinctly the characteristics of a country, geographical area, or region which
are most pertinent to psychological operations, and which can serve as an immediate reference for the
planning and conduct of psychological operations. (JP 1-02) Also called BPS.
Civil Affairs
Designated Active Army and Reserve Component forces that are organized, equipped, and trained to
carry out missions that specifically include the conduct or support to Civil Affairs activities.
combatant command
A unified or specified command with a broad continuing mission under a single commander established
and so designated by the President, through the Secretary of Defense and with the advice and assistance
of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Combatant commands typically have geographic or functional
responsibilities. (JP 1-02)
conditions
Existing elements that affect a target audience's behavior. Conditions can be external, such as situations
and events, or internal, such as values, beliefs, and attitudes.
cause-and-effect analysis
Identifies the motivations and consequences of the target audiences (TA) current behavior and often,
those that impede or restrict the TA from engaging in the desired behavior.
critical information
Specific facts about friendly intentions, capabilities, and activities vitally needed by adversaries for them
to plan and act effectively so as to guarantee failure or unacceptable consequences for friendly mission
accomplishment.
deception
Those measures designed to mislead the enemy by manipulation, distortion, or falsification of evidence to
induce the enemy to react in a manner prejudicial to the enemys interests. (JP 1-02)
effectiveness
The actual ability of a target audience to carry out the desired behavioral or attitudinal change.
Glossary-6
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
Glossary
joint doctrine
Fundamental principles that guide the employment of forces of two or more military departments in
coordinated action toward a common objective. It is authoritative; as such, joint doctrine will be followed
except when, in the judgment of the commander, exceptional circumstances dictate otherwise. It will be
promulgated by or for the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the combatant
commands and Services. (JP 1-02)
joint force
A general term applied to a force composed of significant elements, assigned or attached, of two or more
military departments operating under a single joint force commander. (JP 1-02)
joint operations
A general term to describe military actions conducted by joint forces or by Service forces in relationships
(e.g., support, coordinating authority) which, of themselves, do not create joint forces. (JP 1-02)
joint Psychological Operations task force
A joint special operations task force composed of headquarters and operational assets. It assists the joint
force commander in developing strategic, operational, and tactical psychological operation plans for a
theater campaign or other operations. Mission requirements will determine its composition and assigned
or attached units to support the joint task force commander. (JP 1-02) Also called JPOTF.
joint task force
A joint force that is constituted and so designated by the Secretary of Defense, a combatant commander,
a subunified commander, or an existing joint task force commander. (JP 1-02) Also called JTF
national objectives
The aims, derived from national goals and interests, toward which a national policy or strategy is directed
and efforts and resources of the nation are applied. (JP 1-02)
nongovernmental organization
Transnational organizations of private citizens that maintain a consultative status with the Economic and
Social Council of the United Nations. Nongovernmental organizations may be professional associations,
foundations, multinational businesses, or simply groups with a common interest in humanitarian
assistance activities (development and relief). Nongovernmental organizations is a term normally used
by non-United States organizations. (JP 1-02) Also called NGO.
medium
Singular form of media.
potential target audience list
List of target audiences the planner initially thinks have the ability to accomplish the SPOs. Also called
PTAL.
psychological actions
Activities conducted for their psychological impact.
Psychological Operations
(1) Planned operations to convey selected information and indicators to foreign audiences to influence
their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of foreign governments,
organizations, groups, and individuals. The purpose of psychological operations is to induce or reinforce
foreign attitudes and behavior favorable to the originators objectives. Also called PSYOP. (JP 1-02)
(2) (DOD) Planned operations to convey selected information and indicators to foreign audiences to
influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of foreign government,
organizations, groups, and individuals. The purpose of psychological operations is to induce or reinforce
foreign attitudes and behavior favorable to the originators objectives. Also called PSYOP.
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
Glossary-7
Glossary
(3) (NATO) Planned psychological activities in peace and war directed to enemy, friendly, and neutral
audiences in order to influence attitudes and behavior affecting the achievement of political and military
objectives. They include strategic psychological activities, psychological consolidation activities, and
battlefield psychological activities.
Psychological Operations action
Action or activity planned primarily for its psychological impact. Also called PSYACT.
Psychological Operations argument
The overall argument and approach used to obtain a desired behavior or attitude from the target
audience. Main argument- reason(s) that the TA should engage in the desired behavior. Supporting
argument- used to provide factual evidence, address causes, effects, and exploit vulnerabilities. They
increase a TA's motivation to accept the main argument.
Psychological Operations assessment criteria
These are the objective measures used to monitor and assess changes in target audience behavior over
time. These behavioral trends are then analyzed in relation to PSYOP series execution. PSYOP
assessment criteria are written as questions. Initially developed during planning and refined during TAA,
these questions are based upon the specific, measurable and observable desired behavior(s) that
PSYOP wants to influence. When answered, the assessment criteria describe trends in behavior change.
Over time, these behavior trends will help determine the degree of success in achieving the SPO.
Psychological Operations impact indicator
An observable event or a discernible subjectively determined behavioral change that represents an effect
of a Psychological Operations activity on the intended foreign target audience at a particular point in time.
It is measured evidence, ascertained during the analytical phase of the Psychological Operations
development process, to evaluate the degree to which the Psychological Operations objective is
achieved.
Psychological Operations objective
A statement of a measurable response that reflects the desired attitude or behavior change of a selected
foreign target audience as a result of Psychological Operations. Also called PO.
Psychological Operations plan
A series of Psychological Operations programs conducted at the theater level to achieve short- and midterm objectives in support of a geographic combatant commanders goals.
Psychological Operations series
All actions and products developed in support of a single supporting objective and single target audience
combination.
Psychological Operations support element
A tailored element that can provide limited Psychological Operations support. Psychological Operations
support elements do not contain organic command and control capability; therefore, command
relationships must be clearly defined. The size, composition, and capability of the Psychological
Operations support element are determined by the requirements of the supported commander. A
Psychological Operations support element is not designed to provide full-spectrum Psychological
Operations capability; reachback is critical for its mission success. Also called PSE.
Psychological Operations task force
A task force composed of Psychological Operations units formed to carry out a specific psychological
operation or prosecute Psychological Operations in support of a theater campaign or other operations.
The Psychological Operations task force may have conventional non-Psychological Operations units
assigned or attached to support the conduct of specific missions. The Psychological Operations task
force commander is usually a joint task force component commander. Also called POTF.
Glossary-8
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
Glossary
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
Glossary-9
REFERENCES
Required Publications
Required publications are sources that users must read in order to understand or to comply with this
publication.
Army Regulations
AR 350-1
Field Manuals
FM 3-05.30
FM 3-05.301
FM 3-05.302
FM 7-0
Related publications are sources of additional information. They are not required in order to understand
this publication.
Field Manuals
FM 2-0
FM 3-0
FM 3-05.102
FM 3-13
FM 3-25.26
FM 5-0
FM 6-0
FM 6-20-10
FM 7-8
FM 7-15
FM 31-20-3
FM 34-130
Joint Publications
JP 1-02
JP 2-0
JP 2-01.3
JP 3-0
JP 3-05.2
1 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
References-1
References
JP 3-53
JP 5-0
References-2
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
STP 33-37II-OFS
2 July 2007
Official:
JOYCE E. MORROW
Administrative Assistant to the
0713404
DISTRIBUTION:
Active Army, Army National Guard, and US Army Reserve: Not to be distributed.
Electronic media only.
PIN: 084089-000