BTW 1042 Tutorial Booklet
BTW 1042 Tutorial Booklet
BTW 1042 Tutorial Booklet
1042
Malaysian
Business
Law
Tutorial Booklet
Copyright 2016 NOT FOR RESALE. All materials produced for this course of study
are protected by copyright. Monash students are permitted to use these materials for
personal study and research only. Use of these materials for any other purposes,
including copying or resale may infringe copyright unless written permission has been
obtained from the copyrightholders.
Welcome
Welcome to a very important and interesting area of law.
Youll find many of the topics in the course to be highly relevant not just to
business and commerce but as a consumer, and thus important to your daily
life.
The purpose behind studying any unit is to gain knowledge and this is the
same for Law units obviously. Certainly, just learning the law is useful, but it
is far better if you can BOTH learn the law AND learn how to use that
knowledge in new or unexpected situations. In other words develop skills as
well as knowledge that will continue to serve you well, long after you finish
your studies. So, the unit has been designed to teach both and to assess
both in the assignment and in the final exam.
Over the years we have seen a lot of students struggle with law units
because they did not understand that they were required to master two skills
knowledge of the law and the ability to use that knowledge. Some students
even try to memorise large slabs of the text and then write out what they
have memorised in the exam. Those students almost always fail. Showing
the examiner that you know the law AND can apply it requires that you
explain and discuss the legal issues involved in the question - just copying
out the text book will never do that effectively.
Finally, we view study as very much a personal voyage/experience and not
just a simple exercise to obtain a piece of paper. So we encourage
students to become more involved in their studies than the bare minimum
needed to pass. Whilst this may appear to be a rather antiquated and
idealistic approach it is also a very successful way of obtaining the most out
of your potential.
Once again welcome, enjoy and good luck.
Responsibilities of Students
As a Monash University student you have the following responsibilities:
Ethical Behaviour
In the course of your studies you may undertake research projects or case
studies, and otherwise discuss business issues with managers, employees or
customers of companies or other organisations. Prior to contacting any individual or
organisation, you must acquaint yourself with the universitys Ethics Policy which is
available at:
http://www.monash.edu.au/resgrant/human-ethics/index.html
You must appreciate the goodwill of the individuals and organisations that agree
to assist you and must behave in a professional and ethical manner at all times.
You must never use or divulge the confidential information of any organisation,
including your employer, in any assignment or report without the written permission
of this organisation.
Students collecting material for assignments etc. must properly represent
themselves at all times. You must disclose:
You must never practise any form of misrepresentation nor use unethical
practices to collect information. If you have any doubt about whether or not the data
collection you wish to undertake falls within the universitys Ethics guidelines you
must consult your Unit Coordinator.
Tutors:
Unit Schedule
Where do
our laws
come from?
Week
Activities
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Tutorial
Important Dates
Questions
Assignment Choose Assignment
Instructions
Partner
and
Expectations
Module 1
Module 2
Module 3a(i)
Module
3a (ii)
Module
3b (i)
Module 3c
Module 3d
Module 3e
Module 4
Module 5a
Module 5b
SWOT VAC
Where do
laws come
from?
Module 1:
Introduction to
the malaysian
Legal System
Topic Outline
This is a preliminary topic which examines what law is and from where it
originates. Secondly, it examines the nature and characteristics of the
Malaysian Legal system, and how commerce is regulated. Accordingly it is a
very important topic because it provides the foundation for understanding all
other topics studied this semester.
This topic focuses on:
the nature of the Malaysian Legal system and the various sources of
laws
the role of parliament as a source of law, statutes and the primary rules
of statutory interpretation
the origins of terms such as common law and equity and the meanings
and remedies that are given by each
Learning Objectives
On completing this topic, you should be able to:
identify, and describe the hierarchy of courts and the appeal system and
recognise the role of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms
Readings
Trakic et al., 2014, Law for Business
Ch 1 & 2
Ch 1-8
Ch 1-4
Ch 1
Tutorial Questions
1. Does the common law of England apply in Malaysia? Give reasons for
your answer.
2. When do judges get the opportunity to make new laws?
3.
You may also find a legal dictionary useful to clarify the meaning of other
words and phrases you cover in this unit.
4.
5.
(a)
(b)
(c)
What reasons did the court give for deciding the way it did?
(d)
He said also in effect that he treated the form as "a marketing, probably,
or registration type of form". In re-examination, being asked to expand on
that, he said "... it's usually I feel for a marketing registration purpose (1) to
get my details for obviously issuing me with a licence as a registration form
and (2) as a marketing purpose for sending out pamphlets, things to keep to
go back with other people, other groups and things like that". In that
connexion it may be mentioned that the four opening lines at the top of the
form, in prominent, bold capitals, beginning "TO HELP WITH OUR
ADVERTISING ..." were printed in red, the rest being in black.
Miss Surendran swore that when she arrived at the premises she was
asked to sign a form "where I put my name and address". It was the same
kind of form as that signed by the respondent. When asked in chief what the
form was for, she said "I guess - we were there as a group, and it was organised by 3MP who I
work for. Everyone in the group signed a form to get our licences. You have
to get a licence before you can drive."
She swore in cross-examination that "... it was very rushed. I didn't read
my form"; and that "There was a group of us together and it was very rushed
to fill the forms out ...".
Both the respondent and Miss Surendran drove go-karts at the track on
the night in question. He swore that he qualified to race for a trophy and that
in the course of a race his vehicle overturned, when he suffered a fracture of
his arm. His story was that the overturning was attributable to a defect in the
track whereas the appellant contended that the respondent's vehicle had
collided with another while he was driving recklessly, causing it to overturn.
In his statement of claim the respondent relied on three causes of action:
breach of a contract for the hire of a go-kart; breach of s.52 of the Trade
Practices Act 1974 and of s.11 of the Fair Trading Act 1985; and
negligence. The extent to which the respondent relied at the trial on the
causes of action other than negligence was a matter of some debate before
us. Senior counsel for the respondent (who had not, but whose junior had,
appeared at the trial) told us that the case had been conducted purely as a
negligence claim, the contract claim and the statutory claims having been
abandoned. Be that as it may, it is clear enough that the appellant relied on
the document that had been signed by the respondent as constituting an
agreement, whether the respondent relied on any agreement or not. The
respondent certainly did not rely on the document.
The learned judge accepted the respondent's evidence that he had not
been in a collision with another vehicle but did not find that a defect in the
track caused or contributed to the collision. Instead, his Honour found that
the most likely explanation for the accident was that the respondent
attempted to round a corner at a speed that, because of his want of
instruction and experience, led him to take inappropriate action which
resulted in the overturning. His Honour found in effect that the appellant had
allowed the respondent to engage in go-kart racing, an inherently dangerous
pastime, when he had not had "sufficient education, instruction, experience
and testing" to do so without risk to himself and others. The judge found the
appellant to have been liable to the respondent on that footing but did not
specifically note in his reasons for judgment the cause of action upon which
10
11
part which the trial judge found, namely, allowing the respondent to engage
in the inherently dangerous pastime when he had not had sufficient
instruction from the appellant. In my view, it is clear that on its true
interpretation clause 2 did have that effect.
For the foregoing reasons, I am of opinion that the appeal should be
allowed, the judgment below should be set aside and in lieu thereof it should
be ordered that there be judgment for the defendant (the appellant).
12
Module 2A:
The Law of
Take care or
Torts,
else!?
Negligence
and negligent
Misstatement (Advice)
Topic Outline
This topic examines careless advice that results in a victim suffering a purely
financial loss: NOT a physical injury: eg poor advice regarding investments
from a financial planner.
Learning Objectives
On completing this topic, you should be able to:
state the common law rules developed for negligent misstatement and
apply these rules to a practical situation;
state and apply the rules relevant for auditors and the giving of advice to
a third party.
Readings
Trakic et al., 2014, Law for Business
Ch 14
Ch 21
Ch 3
Tutorial Questions
1. What must be shown before a person can have an action against another
for negligent misstatement?
2. Mrs. Nguyen asked her accountant Mr. Wu for investment advice. On
behalf of his client Mr Wu telephoned the City of Dandenong, and asked
them about their plans to redevelop the suburb of Doveton. In particular
13
14
Enforcin
g a contract
is simple: a
BIG, BIG
Stick!!
Sub-topics
Topic 3a: Formation
This will deal with forming valid contracts.
Topic 3b: Contents
Terms, both express and implied within the contract will
be examined in this topic
.
Topic 3c: Exemption Clauses
This will examine exclusion clauses and limitation clauses
Topic 3d: Vitiating factors
How an agreement can be legally terminated due to
factors that vitiate or affect a partys consent to the
contract.
Topic 3e: Breach of contract & Remedies
This sub-topic will cover the different forms of breach and
remedies available.
15
3a: Formation
Topic Outline
This will deal with forming valid contracts. It will be divided into two parts:
(1) offer and acceptance; (2) intention to be bound and consideration. (There
are other aspects to formation such as legality of the agreement and
capacity of the parties but we will only focus on the 4 listed here.)
When analysing whether a contract is formed it is useful to bear in mind
the concept of consensus ad idem. In order to determine whether an
agreement is reached (offer and acceptance), and secondly, whether such
an agreement is intended to be legally binding (intention to be bound) and is
legally binding (consideration).
Readings
Trakic et al., 2014, Law for Business
Syed Ahmad Alsagoff, Principles of the Law of Contract in Malaysia
Adnan Trakic, An Offer Vis-a-Vis An Invitation to Treat: A
Comparative Analysis with Reference to Malaysia, [2012] 5 MLJ i
Adnan Trakic, Offer and Its Significance for Formation of Contracts:
The Malaysian Perspective, [2012] 5 MLJ cxlvii
Abdul Majid bin Nabi Baksh & Krishnan Arjunan, Business Law in
Ch 3 & 4
Ch 1-4
Ch 8&9
16
Malaysia
Sweeney and OReilly, Law in Commerce
Ch 4
Tutorial Questions
1. What are the elements that make up a legally enforceable
agreement?
2. Alan needed money quickly. He owned an original 1886 edition of
Kidnapped by Robert Louis Stevenson, a book which he advertised
in the newspaper for sale for $1000. Cate saw the advertisement.
She telephoned Alan, saying that she would buy the book for $1000.
Alan, however, replied that he had reconsidered the matter and that
he could not sell the book for less than $2000.
Cate replied that she would give him $1500. Alan replied that he
would only sell the book for $2000 but that he would keep his offer
open for seven days. He also said that Cate could fax her
acceptance to him if she wanted. The next day Alan sold the book to
his friend David because David loved the book so much and because
he paid $7000 for it. Two days later Cate decided to purchase the
book for Alans price of $2000. She posted her acceptance to Alan.
The next day David told Cate that he had bought a copy of
Kidnapped from Alan for $7,000. Cate rang Alan to confirm that she
had accepted his offer. Later that day Alan received Cates
acceptance. Is there a contract between ay of the parties? Explain
why using IRAC.
3. Video case study/problem
Watch the video problem titled Video 2: Forming a contract? The
script of the video scenario is available at the end of this Unit Guide.
Advise Gerrie whether there is a binding contract to buy/sell the car.
Give full reasons for your answer.
17
Part 2: Intention/Consideration
Topic Outline
This topic examines the second series of rules for formation of contract and
the elements for making a valid contract. It examines:
Learning Objectives
On completing this sub-topic, you should be able to:
identify how
consideration
deed
overcomes
potential
problems
regarding
Readings
Trakic et al., 2014, Law for Business
Ch 5-7
Ch 5 & 6
Ch 10 & 11
Ch 5
Tutorial Questions
1.
(a) You and your friends form the Sunway Photographic Society in
order to pursue your hobby of photography. You need to find a place
where you can hold meetings. Luckily one of the groups fathers lets
you use his garage (on his residential property) for 6 months provided
18
you pay him the sum of RM10 per month, and promise not to wreck
the property. Is this a legally binding agreement?
(b) You decide to organise a raffle to raise money. Is it possible to take
steps to ensure that there is no legally binding agreement between the
Sunway Photographic Society and the contestants? Provide an
example of what you would do.
2.
RM10,000 owing to B
RM 5,000 owing to C
3.
Albert is a builder. Bea is the owner of a block of land upon which she
intends to build a house. Albert and Bea enter into a contract for Albert to
build a house for RM75,000. The contract contains no provision for the price
to increase in line with price rises in materials. The price of materials rises
significantly. Albert wants an extra RM10,000 to continue. Bea agrees and
Albert builds the house.
Does Bea have to pay the extra RM10,000?
19
3b: Contents
Topic outline
This topic examines the content of the contract, in other words the terms
of the contract. Terms are divided into two general categories: (1) express
terms; and (2) implied terms. We will also examine exemption clauses,
which are a very important type of term, and, thus they deserve separate
attention.
Thus this topic will be divided into three parts: (1) express terms; (2)
implied terms; and (3) exemption clauses.
Learning Objectives
On completing this sub-topic, you should be able to:
define and apply the parol evidence rule and the exceptions to this rule
Readings
Trakic et al., 2014, Law for Business
Syed Ahmad Alsagoff, Principles of the Law of Contract in
Malaysia
Abdul Majid bin Nabi Baksh & Krishnan Arjunan, Business Law in
Malaysia
Sweeney and OReilly, Law in Commerce
Ch 8
Ch 9
Ch 13
Ch 6
20
Tutorial Questions
1. In Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams [1957] 1 WLR 370 the statement
about the age of the car was held to be a mere representation,
whereas in Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardon [1976] 2 WLR 583 the
statement about the turnover of the petrol station was held to be a
term.
What is the difference between a term and a mere representation?
Why is the difference crucial? What factors do the courts take into
account when differentiating between terms and mere
representations?
2. What is the parol evidence rule? What effect does it have on
determining the contents of a contract? What are the major
exceptions to the parol evidence rule?
3. You are the legal compliance team who work for The Southern Cross
Hospital which is in conflict with Zapit Ltd and wants your help
resolving the following problem.
The hospital hired an X-ray machine from Zapit Ltd. At the time of
hiring, the hospital manager enquired about maintenance of the Xray and was told that all maintenance was the responsibility of the
hospital during the period of hire. At the same time the hospital
manager was presented with a three page pre-typed document for
signature. The manager only read parts of the document. One clause
that the manager did not read said:
Any maintenance must be carried out by Zapit Ltd. Strict compliance
with this condition is of the essence of the contract.
The hospital repaired the X-ray using its own hospital maintenance
staff. The staff are highly skilled and able to carry out such repairs.
When Zapit heard of the hospitals actions it notified the hospital that
the contract was terminated and the machine had to be returned
immediately. The hospital is unable to replace the machine at short
notice and wants to know if it has to return the X-ray.
(a) Advise the hospital regarding its rights and obligations, and make
suggestions as to how it might avoid this problem in the future.
(b) Would your answer be different if the manager had read the
document in full?
(c) Would your answer be different if the manager queried whether
the hospital could perform the maintenance and was told by a
secretary at Zapit: 'Im not totally sure but I think it should be ok.'
21
Learning Objectives
On completing this sub-topic, you should be able to:
describe when the courts are prepared to fill in the gaps in the express
contract;
identify those contracts where the courts commonly imply terms;
explain what happens with terms implied by statutes
apply the concepts and rules examined in this topic to practical situations
Readings
Trakic et al., 2014, Law for Business
Syed Ahmad Alsagoff, Principles of the Law of Contract in Malaysia
Abdul Majid bin Nabi Baksh & Krishnan Arjunan, Business Law in
Malaysia
Sweeney and OReilly, Law in Commerce
Ch 8
Ch 9
Ch 13
Ch 6
Tutorial Questions
1. How are terms implied into contracts?
2. Charlie enters R Pty Ltds shop. He speaks to a salesperson, Look,
Im going climbing in the Himalayas and I need a warm sleeping bag.
What have you got?
The salesperson shows Charlie three sleeping bags, one of which is
the tent manufactured by X. The salesperson is called away. Charlie
selects Xs tent and pays the cashier $750.
22
Charlie goes to the Himalayas and suffers frost-bite because the tent
is totally inadequate. In fact the tent is designed for use in mild
climates. Charlie hobbles into Rs store and demands an explanation
and compensation.
The manager says, Well you selected the tent and whats more the
sign at the cashiers desk clearly states that R Pty Ltd makes no
promises, warranties or conditions in relation to the goods sold and
shall not be liable for any damages save and except replacement of
goods proved to be faulty at the time of sale.
C remembers reading the sign at the time he bought the goods.
Does C have a good cause of action against R Pty Ltd.?
23
Learning Objectives
On completing this sub-topic, you should be able to:
Readings
Trakic et al., 2014, Law for Business
Syed Ahmad Alsagoff, Principles of the Law of Contract in Malaysia
Abdul Majid bin Nabi Baksh & Krishnan Arjunan, Business Law in
Malaysia
Sweeney and OReilly, Law in Commerce
Ch 9 & 10
Ch 9
Ch 14
Ch 6
Tutorial Questions
1. Where a person signs a document that contains an exemption
clause, is that party bound by the exemption clause? Where the
document containing an exemption clause is unsigned, what must
the party seeking to rely on the clause show before they can rely on
the clause?
2. Annie takes her expensive coat to Simons Dry Cleaning. She is
handed a ticket, the face of which contains a number, her name, a
description of the coat and an annotation to the effect that the coat
will be available for collection the following Friday. On the reverse
side in small print are the words: Conditions apply. On the rear wall
facing the counter is a sign written in even smaller print which reads:
Simons Dry Cleaning will not be liable for any stains or other
damage to any clothing whatsoever. On Annies return she discovers
the coat has bad stain marks on it. Advise her.
3. Jim runs a small cartage operation in Kuala Lumpur. One of his best
customers is ABC Ltd, which operates a chain of retail stores
throughout the metropolitan area. ABC uses Jim to transfer goods
from one store to another as the situation requires. The agreed
procedure is always the same.
ABC telephones Jim and gives him the collection point and the
destination. Jim picks up the goods. An employee of ABC and Jim fill
in and sign a collection docket. ABC keeps the duplicate. Jim takes
24
the goods directly to the drop off point and has the docket
countersigned by another employee of ABC.
Jims Cartage Company
Sir John Monash Drive, Caulfield
Collection Docket
Date:
Pick-up address:
Destination:
Goods:
Consignors signature:
Jims signature:
See Over Terms
25
the instances in which contracts created by a minor will and will not be
enforceable against the minor due to the minors limited contractual
capacity.
Learning Objectives
On completing this sub-topic, you should be able to:
define incapacity of a minor and describe the rules regarding the liability
of minors for contracts involving necessaries and beneficial contracts of
service
26
Readings
Trakic et al., 2014, Law for Business
Syed Ahmad Alsagoff, Principles of the Law of Contract in Malaysia
Abdul Majid bin Nabi Baksh & Krishnan Arjunan, Business Law in
Malaysia
Sweeney and OReilly, Law in Commerce
Ch 11
Ch 11,
12, 13, & 14.
Ch 15
Ch 8
Tutorial Questions
1. Answer the following questions, using cases to support your answer:
a. What are the elements of misrepresentation?
b. When is a misrepresentation fraudulent? What are the
remedies for a victim of such a fraudulent misrepresentation?
What are the remedies for a victim of such an innocent
misrepresentation? What is negligent misrepresentation?
c. Explain the legal concept of duress, coercion, undue
influence and mistake.
d. Explain the remedy of rescission. In what circumstances is
the right to rescind lost?
2.
27
the relevant remedies available to the party to seek relief for that form of
breach.
Learning Objectives
On completing this sub-topic, you should be able to:
list the types of breach and the consequences that flow from each type
list the rules relating to the award of damages with particular emphasis
on the two limbs of Hadley v Baxendale
Readings
Trakic et al., 2014, Law for Business
Syed Ahmad Alsagoff, Principles of the Law of Contract in Malaysia
Abdul Majid bin Nabi Baksh & Krishnan Arjunan, Business Law in
Malaysia
Sweeney and OReilly, Law in Commerce
Ch 12 & 24
Ch 17, 18 &
19
Ch 18 & 19
Ch 8
Tutorial Questions
1. On 1 March 2015, the Monash Soccer Team booked a flight to
London to participate in the World Universities Football Cup from 21
to 26 March 2015. Their travel agents, Freedom Flight Sdn Bhd,
gave a discount fare of RM2000 per person, 50% of the price was
28
paid upon booking and the balance of the price was to be paid on 19
March 2015 upon collecting the tickets.
On 18 March 2015, the air traffic controllers of KLIA declared a strike
when the airport management refused to reduce their retirement age
to 45 years old.
When the Monash Soccer Team went to Freedom Flight Sdn Bhd on
19 March 2015, he refused to pay the balance unless it is confirmed
that the team can fly out of Kuala Lumpur on 19 March 2015.
The strike lasted for three days. By that time it was too late for the
team to compete in the competition.
The Monash Soccer Team claims for the return of the sum paid to
Freedom Flight Sdn Bhd. Freedom Flight Sdn Bhd refused to return it
and instead sued for the balance 50% to be paid by the Monash
Soccer Team.
Decide.
2. Alpha Pty Ltd hires a machine from Beta Machines Ltd. The machine
has been negligently maintained by Beta. It breaks down, and it will
take Beta three weeks to repair the machine. A replacement can be
hired, but none is available for a week.
Normal losses amount to RM1,000 a day. [Alphas factory operates 7
days a week.] Alpha Pty Ltd has also lost a lucrative government
contract worth a further RM50,000. The hire of the replacement
machine is RM5,000 in total. What damages can Alpha Pty Ltd
claim?
29
30
Module 4:
AGENCY,
Agency!
Introduction
Topic outline
This topic will examine:
how the agents actions may affect the principals rights and obligations
in relation to a third party
the agents authority, how the law determines the scope of that authority
the rights and duties owed by the agent to the principal, the concept of
fiduciary duties
31
termination of agency.
Learning Objectives
At the end of this topic you should be able to:
list and apply the rules regarding an agents duties to the principal to
determine if the agent breached these duties
Readings
Trakic et al., 2014, Law for Business
Abdul Majid bin Nabi Baksh & Krishnan Arjunan, Business Law in
Malaysia
Sweeney and OReilly, Law in Commerce
Ch 13
Ch 20
Ch 10
Tutorial Questions
1.
2.
Sam, the Accountant of XYZ Ltd, often acted as the Acting Manager of
the company while the Managing Director and other senior staff were
absent. His normal duties when in such a position involved overseeing
internal company matters and ensuring that his own Accounting
Department operated well. While acting as Acting Manager, Sam
purchased land at auction from TP on behalf of the company for $1
million.
Advise the company whether it may withdraw from the contract on the
ground that he acted outside his authority.
32
3.
4.
Patrick appoints Adolf as his agent to sell his original art work by Tom
Wesselmann entitled Bathtub Collage. Patrick and Adolf enter a
written contract which states Adolf is entitled to a commission of 10%
of the sale price. Adolf is approached by the Galerie Sonnabend (GS)
in Paris. GS agreed to purchase the work for $950,000. In addition,
they paid Adolf an additional commission of 15% of the purchase price
to ensure that their offer was accepted by Patrick. The Tate Gallery in
London offered $1,000,000 to Adolf to purchase the painting but did
not agree to give him an additional personal commission, saying his
commission was to be paid by Patrick. Patrick sold the work to GS
unaware that the Tate Gallery had offered a higher price. After the sale
Patrick becomes aware that Adolf obtained a secret commission of
15% of the sale price from the GS.
(a)
(b)
33
Module 5:
business
Structures:
Partnership and
Corporations
Introduction
Learning Objectives
At the end of this topic you should be able to:
34
determine whether and to what extent partners are liable for their copartners contractual and/or tortious acts
Readings
Trakic et al., 2014, Law for Business
Abdul Majid bin Nabi Baksh & Krishnan Arjunan, Business Law in
Malaysia
Sweeney and OReilly, Law in Commerce
Ch 20
Ch 26
Ch 11
Tutorial Questions
1.
2.
35
Only Desmond has put capital into the business, and no formal
agreement exists between them. However, on many occasions Fred
has purchased stock, such as bread, and fresh vegetables, for the
business from their various suppliers by using his own money, and he
has also set up an account with the suppliers in the name of Soggy
Sangers. Cedric also has often placed orders on behalf of the
business with their various suppliers for stock.
At their next meeting Fred, suggests selling alcoholic ice cream.
Desmond likes the idea but Cedric, being a teetotaller, does not. Such
a change would require extensive renovation of the shop, and also
obtaining a licence to sell alcohol. This requires an application to the
relevant government authority, which may reject the application.
Finally Desmond wishes to leave in two months but wants to make
sure that he has no further obligations and commitments once he
leaves the business.
Answer the following questions:
(a) Is the business a partnership? Yes/No (explain).
(b) Can Fred and Desmond validly make a decision to embark
on the ice cream making venture without Cedrics consent?
(d) What should Desmond do before he leaves the business?
3.
(b)
(c)
36
Learning Objectives
At the end of this topic you should be able to explain:
Readings
Trakic et al., 2014, Law for Business
Abdul Majid bin Nabi Baksh & Krishnan Arjunan, Business Law in
Malaysia
Sweeney and OReilly, Law in Commerce
Ch 20
Ch 25
Ch 12
Tutorial Questions
1. A company is a person separate from its members and its directors.
Explain what this means.
2. Sam, Brian and Ah Kau intend to set up a company known as Setia
Sdn Bhd. They seek your advise on the following:
a) How is a company incorporated?
b) What is the effect of incorporation?
3. Jack and Jill are 2 directors and shareholders of Jakun Sdn. Bhd.
Jakun Sdn Bhd would like to borrow RM100,000 from Asia Bank
Berhad. Asia Bank Berhad asked for the Memorandum of
Association and Articles of Association of Jakun Sdn Bhd.
37
6. Corina Parsons was the company secretary of Grand Pty Ltd. The
terms of her authority were set out in her employment contract
these were rather restrictive since the managing director was her
uncle who did not have a great deal of confidence in his young
eighteen-year-old niece (who in fact looked a lot older than her age).
Without the permission of the company Corina hires a car in the
companys name from Exec Hire Car Company. In fact she uses the
car for her own personal use neither Grand Pty Ltd nor Exec Hire
Car Company was aware of this until later on.
Advise Grand Pty Ltd whether it is responsible for the debt to Exec
Hire Car Company.
38
Additional Materials
The following section contains additional materials to assist your study in this unit.
Following, you will find the scripts and associated material for video scenarios 15.
The statutory materials are reprinted in your unit Reader.
The client, Wayne, average-looking person (the proprietor of a small caf business,
Waynes World)
[The scene opens with Steve (accountant) and Wayne (client) sitting in
Steves office.]
Steve:
I understand that you want to reduce your tax bill this year?
Wayne:
You bet I do.
Steve:
Well, there is a way, and its perfectly legal. As a small business run by
a sole proprietor, the tax man doesnt distinguish between your
business expenses and your personal expenses, right? Its not like a
company. So what you should do is have all your business bills put into
your name, and then you can claim things like your home phone bills,
gas, electricity and the like against the business income. The tax man
cant tell the difference between home ones and work ones, see?
Wayne:
But how can that be legal?
Steve:
Look, its a bit technical, got to do with the concept of legal personality.
Ever heard of it?
Wayne:
No
Steve:
Well, dont you worry about it. Leave the worrying to me! Thats what
you pay me for! Here is a brochure* setting out all the details of what
you have to do.
[Wayne reads the brochure* briefly. The camera films the brochure
briefly. The brochure begins Want to pay less tax?]
Wayne:
Okay, where do I sign? (Chuckles)
Steve:
No, theres nowhere to sign, just do like Ive just told you and youll be
fine.
[The two men shake hands and Wayne leaves Steves office.]
[New scene]
[After leaving Steves office, Wayne immediately sees his friend, Primrose
the florist who seems to be delivering flowers.]
Primrose:
What are you up to, Wayne?
Wayne:
Just been to the accountant to save myself a whole lot of tax.
Primrose:
Not possible, Wayne. You cant beat those guys.
39
Wayne:
Oh yes you can. Have a look at this brochure*. You could use the
same method for your florist business.
[Primrose examines it and looks impressed.]
Primrose:
Can I keep this for a few days?
Wayne:
Sure. Just let me have it back when youve finished, because I might
show some of my friends at the pub.
Primrose:
Thanks. Bye.
[Scene closes.]
[New scene.]
[Scene opens with Wayne and Primrose together, looking different (six
months have passed).]
Primrose:
(Turns to Wayne, clearly upset/angry): Thanks for nothing, Wayne. I
followed your accountants advice six months ago and now the tax
department is claiming I owe them heaps of money in unpaid tax and
penalties.
Wayne:
Yeah, I got a huge tax bill too. The same thing happened to my friends
at the pub who followed the advice in that brochure too.
It seems that accountants advice was totally wrong, maybe even
negligent. But I dont think its fair that I have to pay tax penalties when
it was my accountants fault. Were going to see if weve got rights to
make him pay for this problem.
Primrose:
That sounds fairer. Let me know what happens.
[Scene closes,]
End of scenario.
friends at the pub: a colloquial expression meaning friends with whom he
socialises frequently.
*Brochure: the brochure referred to in this scenario is shown below.
40
41
[The scene opens with Gerrie and Wayne standing beside Gerries car with
a For Sale $15,000 sign on it. Bonnet of car is up. Wayne has just finished
inspecting the car.]
Gerrie:
Wayne:
Well, I like the car, but I cant afford 15,000 dollars right now.
Gerrie:
Well, I could give it to you for 14,000, but thats as low as I can go.
Wayne:
I could give you 10,000 dollars now, and the other 4,000 when I get
paid next month.
[Primrose approaches.]
Primrose:
Hi Gerrie. I heard you were selling your car and Im looking for a car
like this. How much would you take for it?
Gerrie:
Wayne:
Gerrie:
No we didnt, Wayne. I wanted 14,000 now, but you said youd pay on
10,000 now and the other 4,000 next month.
Primrose
interrupts:
Ill give you $14,000 today, but the cars got to pass my
mechanics tests Im no mechanical expert, so Id have to get my
mechanic to check out the engine.
Gerrie:
[talking now to Primrose] Thats OK. You can take it to your mechanic
for a check and if he says its in good condition, you take the car.
Wayne:
Gerrie:
[talking to Wayne] No we didnt I wanted all the money now, and you
wanted to pay in a month.
Wayne:
42
Gerrie:
Primrose interrupts again: (urgently) Ill give you the full 15,000, but the cars still
got to pass my mechanics tests.
Gerrie:
(Excited) You have a deal $15,000 it is. Here are the keys, you go
and get your mechanic to look at it.
[Gerrie hands the car keys to Primrose, who drives away. Gerrie and Wayne
remain standing at the kerbside. Wayne is NOT happy.]
Wayne:
Thats not right. [pause] Thats just not right we had a deal: 14,000
for me to buy the car. You agreed to sell me the car. We had a contract
and you broke it!
Gerrie:
Im sorry, but thats rubbish. I hadnt actually given you the keys to the
car yetand you hadnt paid me the money yet. We didnt have a
contract. Sorry, but I did nothing wrong here.
[At that instant, the car returns with Primrose driving. We see Primrose get out of
the car and hand the car keys back to Gerrie.]
Gerrie:
Primrose:
Well, my mechanic is just around the corner and she took one look at
the radiator and said the car has blown a head gasket. Fixing a head
gasket is not a cheap job. Sorry, but Im not taking the car.
OK Wayne, so the car is yours after all for 14,000 like you wanted.
Wayne:
[Scene closes.]
End of scenario.
43
Video 3: Agency
[SETTING: The scene takes place in the office of a tax accountant.]
Characters:
Primrose
[The scene opens with Primrose entering the accountants office. Steve
looks up and smiles.]
Steve:
Ah, Primrose
Primrose:
Hello Mr Cooper. I was just dropping off this weeks flowers for your
reception area, when your secretary said you wanted to see me.
Steve:
Yes, Primrose. Clients often comment on your floral arrangements and
I thought you might be able to help me out. Ive decided that the board
room here needs some new artwork and Im afraid I dont have the time
or the skill to pick something appropriate. I hear you have a background
in interior decorating and I was wondering whether you might be
interested in helping me out.
Primrose:
Well
Steve:
Id pay you for your time of course does $100 sound fair?
Primrose:
Yes it sounds fine, but how would this work?
Steve:
Well, I have the name and address of a small exclusive gallery here. I
was thinking that I could give the gallery a call and tell them to expect
you. Ive bought work from there before so they will be happy to let me
pay after delivery.
You could call in to the gallery at a time that suited you, and choose
something appropriate for the boardroom. Would that be OK?
Primrose:
That sounds fine I could go there early next week and bring the
painting with me when I come here again next Thursday.
Steve:
Excellent. Now Ill call that gallery while youre here.
[Steve picks up phone and dials number on business card. After short pause for
ringing, Steve speaks into phone.]
44
[Primrose has a painting with her, currently painting is turned away from
the camera.]
Primrose:
Steve:
Is that right? Great. [Looks in direction of painting] Hmmm, its not quite
as large as I was expecting. Can I have a look?
Primrose:
Steve:
Primrose:
Like I was saying, its a bargain. Just $12,000. I saw a smaller one by
this artist on sale last month for over 20,000. Its a really good
buyand I think youll grow to like it.
Steve:
I dont think Ill ever like it and at 12,000 thats more than the limit I set.
Primrose:
45
Steve:
Im not paying for this piece of junk, you can be sure of thatAnd I
wont be paying you that $100 I promised either youve totally made
a mess of this, thats for sure!
[Scene closes.]
End of scenario.
46
Video 4: Partnership
[SETTING: The scene takes place in an accountants office same office
as Video 1: Defective Advice.]
Characters:
Gerrie, financial adviser and junior partner in Steves Professional Accounting firm
[The scene opens with Steve alone in office. There is a pile of papers/letter
on his desk or in nearby background.]
[Steve hears a knock and Gerrie appears. Gerrie seems angry or upset. She
has opened mail in her hand.]
Steve:
Come in Gerrie. Sit down.
Gerrie:
I dont understand. This was delivered to me here today. [She slaps the
document on Steves desk and points to it ] it says Im being sued.
Steve:
Sued? What for?
Gerrie:
It saysyeah, it says here [seems to read from the document]that
you gave some person incorrect tax advice that caused him to lose
$20,000 in tax penaltiesIs this true?
Steve:
[coughs embarrassedly]Well it could be who was the client ?
Gerrie:
It says something about Wayne of Waynes World Cafs.
Steve:
Wayne?Yes I remember advising Wayne. Ive got a letter from his
lawyer somewhere here. [He leafs half-heartedly through the stack of
papers on his desk]
Gerrie:
Well, is it true did you give bad advice?
Steve:
Ummm, it seems I did get the advice wrong. I got some legal advice
and it seems I might have been negligent and maybe also in breach of
my contract to clients like Steve.
Gerrie:
Oh. [shocked/deflated] Ouch!But I dont understand. If youre
responsible, then why havent you paid that client Wayne?and why
am I being sued?Id only just joined this firm at the time this event
happened.
47
Well, theres a lot of people I gave similar advice to some just relied
on a brochure I sent out and theyre all wanting me to pay for their
losses. I cant afford it all. Even if I sold my home, it still wouldnt be
enough. I guess that client, Waynes lawyer, is probably suing both me
and you to make sure Wayne gets his money.
Gerrie:
But I wasnt the one who gave the wrong advice it was you! In fact I
thought wed agreed that youd give financial planning advice to clients
and leave me to give the tax advice.
Anyway, Im only a junior partner compared to you our partnership
agreement says we share profits and losses 60-40: I only get 40% of
the profits and so Im only responsible for 40% of any losses.
I still dont understand why I should have to pay for any of your
mistakes, but if I do, then surely Im not responsible for the whole lot?
Steve:
I dont know. Maybe you should get some advice about where you
stand.
[Scene closes.]
End of scenario.
Steve:
48
Video 5: Companies
[SETTING: The scene takes place at a caf table.]
Characters:
Wayne, owner and director of a company operating Waynes World Cafs in Melbourne,
Australia
Primrose, florist
[The scene opens with Wayne and Primrose sitting opposite each other
across the caf table.]
Wayne:
Hi Primrose
[Wayne and Primrose shake hands]
Primrose:
Hello Wayne, sorry to disturb you here at the caf, but I really need to
discuss this matter with you.
Wayne:
Well, I have a little time before the lunchtime customers arrive. What
can I help you with?
Primrose:
Its about the flowers for your cafs for the last four months. I run my
florist business on a tight budget and I simply cant afford to let
accounts go unpaid for long.
Wayne:
I understand that, but
Primrose:
[Holds out a stack of papers (invoices)] These invoices alone total over
$5,000, and that doesnt include the current months orders. With your
10 cafs around the city your orders for flowers have grown
enormously
Wayne:
Yeah, I know. First I just had one and then 2, and then 5, and almost
before I knew it there were 10. Thats part of the reason why I formed
the company six months ago, rather than running all the cafs as a sole
trader.
Primrose:
and thats great for you, but my business needs to survive, and for
that I need you to pay these invoices.
\Wayne:
Well, thats just it, you see. The cafs arent doing so well. A few
months ago, business started dropping off and in the last two months,
things just seem to be getting worse. Im sure that in summer business
will pick up and the cafs will start to turn a profit again, but at the
moment my business is in the red.
[Wayne takes the invoices from Primrose and glances through them.]
Wayne:
All these orders were made after I formed the company they are all
in my companys name [POINTING DOWN TO INVOICE READS
ALOUD]: Waynes World Pty Ltd.
Primrose:
Yeah,so?
Wayne:
Like I saidthe company is in the red its not making enough
money to cover the expenses at the moment.
Primrose:
Im really sorry to hear that Wayne, but Im trying to run a business too.
I need these accounts to be paid. The way I see it, you ordered the
flowers for your company, and in any case you run the company so you
are personally responsible to pay its bills, like you did when you were a
sole trader.
49
Yes I do run the business in fact Im the only director and the sole
shareholder, but that doesnt mean I have to pay its expenses.
Primrose:
I dont think thats right or fair!If I dont get the money by the end of
the week, your company and you will be hearing from my lawyerI
want the money you owe me.
[Scene closes.]
Wayne:
End of scenario.
50