Samsung
Samsung
Samsung
MANAGEMENT
ASSIGNMENT
Submitted To-
Submitted By-
Amanjot Kaur
BE+MBA, 10th Sem
Batch: 2011-16
UM11502
SAMSUNG
Mission Statement
"Inspire the world, create the future."
Vision 2020
As stated in its new motto, Samsung Electronics' vision for the new decade is, "Inspire the
World, Create the Future."
This new vision reflects Samsung Electronics commitment to inspiring its communities by
leveraging Samsung's three key strengths: New Technology, Innovative Products, and
Creative Solutions. -- and to promoting new value for Samsung's core networks -- Industry,
Partners, and Employees. Through these efforts, Samsung hopes to contribute to a better
world and a richer experience for all.
As part of this vision, Samsung has mapped out a specific plan of reaching $400 billion in
revenue and becoming one of the worlds top five brands by 2020. To this end, Samsung has
also established three strategic approaches in its management: Creativity, Partnership,
and Talent.
Samsung is excited about the future. As we build on our previous accomplishments, we look
forward to exploring new territories, including health, medicine, and biotechnology. Samsung
is committed to being a creative leader in new markets and becoming a truly No. 1 business
going forward.
Companys Values We believe that living by strong values is the key to good business. At Samsung, a rigorous
code of conduct and these core values are at the heart of every decision we make.
People
Quite simply, a company is its people. At Samsung, were dedicated to giving our people a
wealth of opportunities to reach their full potential.
Excellence
Everything we do at Samsung is driven by an unyielding passion for excellenceand an
unfaltering commitment to develop the best products and services on the market.
Change
Integrity
Operating in an ethical way is the foundation of our business. Everything we do is guided by
a moral compass that ensures fairness, respect for all stakeholders and complete transparency.
Co-prosperity
A business cannot be successful unless it creates prosperity and opportunity for others.
Samsung is dedicated to being a socially and environmentally responsible corporate citizen in
every community where we operate around the globe.
Samsung relies on vertical integration as a chief competitive advantage. While Apple still
imports billions of dollars' worth of components from its rival every year, Samsung is
beholden to nobody. It is not a magical formula, Nokia was almost as integrated before being
steamrolled by Apple and Samsung, but Samsung controls some logistical certainty in a way
that Apple does not.
Declining profit margins in 2014 and 2015, however, forced some introspective analysis
within Samsung's executive team. Chairman Lee Kun-hee saw his company's global share of
smartphone sales drop from 35% in 2013 to 24% by early 2015, and his son, Lee Jae-yong,
reportedly wants to respond through mergers and acquisitions (M&As) and partnerships. This
would be a historic shift in focus, likely signalling a departure from self-funded R&D and
into outsourced innovation
The company has an experience of pursuing both, cost leadership as well as product
differentiation strategies during its lifetime.
In 2010, the strategy was mainly cost efficiency prior to Asian Financial Crisis of
1997.
With Eric Kim becoming chief marketing officer of the company, dramatic changes
were bought to the strategy of the company pursuing product differentiation
strategy.
Target market-broad vs. niche play
Samsung, because of the unique ecosystem created around it, has successfully spread
its product line across both of these dimensions
Difficult to implement
Firms aiming to do this are often stuck in the middle
Firms products are too costly to compete with low costs providers product, and too
undifferentiated to command the price premium gained by the differentiated firm
A variety of internal and external factors have helped Samsung achieve this desirable position
Samsungs success has been due to a variety of factors:
Samsung has pursued its differentiation strategy in a way that it has allowed to lower their cost
structure at the same time. This may pose serious threats to both the cost leaders and differentiators
over time.
Two dimensions of competitive strategy are
1.) Competitive advantage - low cost vs. differentiated play
2.) Target Market - broad vs. niche play
Samsung, because of the unique ecosystem created around it, has successfully spread its product line
across both of these dimensions
To conclude, Samsungs marketplace strategy is to flood the market with a myriad of products in a
short period of time. Samsung appeals to more markets by providing a plethora of gadgets such as cell
phones, smart phones, tablets, etc. to both low and high-end markets meaning at least one of their
products will, presumably, appeal to a person. Samsung has done well in the low-end market, but has
only recently begun increasing its presence in the smart phone market and has enjoyed a good amount
of success thus far as a result. For example, in the past year has seen Samsung gain a lot of share in
the smart phone market. Its market share has doubled to more than 36% in Q2 2011 from about 18%
during the same period last year. Samsungs rapid market share increase in the smart phone
marketplace can be partially attributed to Samsungs large amount of different devices as compared to
Apple and other competitors along with, Its huge lead over Apple in the second quarter of 2012,
when it sold nearly twice as many smart phones as Apple, was partly driven by the success of the
Galaxy S III which sold more than 10 million units in under two months. The successful launch and
subsequent consumer reaction to the Galaxy S III, i.e. Samsungs answer to the iPhone, was another
reason for such a large growth in their market share. Lastly, Samsung is not only the biggest adopter
of Googles Android software, but they also have smart phones running the Windows Phone OS as
well. While Apple is narrowed to its own iOS, Samsung is not held by these same boundaries;
Samsungs flood the market strategy works so well because they are able to not only diversify their
hardware, but the software that runs on their smart phones as well.
APPLE
Apples vision statement and mission statement are bases of the companys success as one of the most
valuable companies in the world. Established in 1976 in Cupertino, California, the firm has become a
symbol of innovation and elegance in design. These characteristics are linked to Apples mission
statement and vision statement, which continue to motivate the companys employees to support and
contribute to innovation for competitive advantage. Apple Inc. has changed its mission statement in
recent times, including changes to Steve Jobs original mission statement for the company. Also, Tim
Cook has introduced Apples new vision statement to reflect the current position of the company.
Thus, the firms mission statement and vision statement evolve over time to address changing
organizational and market conditions.
Apple follows its vision statement and mission statement to maintain its competitive strategy. The
vision statement shows the direction of the companys growth and product development. In relation,
Apples mission statement indicates the actions needed to ensure that the company continues in its
success path.
Mission Statement
Apples mission statement has also changed over time. The company considers the changing business
landscape, which influences the possibilities of what Apple can do. The company recognizes the
changing market and industry.
Apples current mission statement is,
Apple designs Macs, the best personal computers in the world, along with OS X, iLife, iWork and
professional software. Apple leads the digital music revolution with its iPods and iTunes online store.
Apple has reinvented the mobile phone with its revolutionary iPhone and App store, and is defining
the future of mobile media and computing devices with iPad.
Apples mission statement is very specific in indicating what the company does and will do. Details
about certain product lines are included to show the firms current condition. The mission statement
mentions Macs, OS X, iLife, iWork, and others. These details are important in recognizing and setting
the baseline for future actions that Apple will implement. These future actions are also provided in
detail. The mission statement includes details about what Apple intends to do in its various businesses.
For example, the firm states that it is defining the future of mobile media and computing devices.
This part of the mission statement shows that Apple plans to continue focusing its research and
development on mobile devices and related media. Such mobile media may include online media via
iTunes, which is accessible through mobile devices like iPad and iPhone. These points show that
Apples mission statement is accurate in depicting the companys situation and goals. However, the
mission statement is quite narrow in representing possibilities for Apple, which is currently in the best
position to explore a wider variety of options. It is also worth noting that this mission statement is a
departure from Steve Jobs original mission for the company: To make a contribution to the world by
making tools for the mind that advance humankind. Apples mission statement has shifted away from
a general picture of the business, toward a specific reflection of what it wants to achieve in terms of
goods and services.
Vision Statement
Apples current vision statement was introduced by CEO Tim Cook, who stated, We believe that we
are on the face of the earth to make great products and thats not changing. We are constantly focusing
on innovating. We believe in the simple not the complex. We believe that we need to own and control
the primary technologies behind the products that we make, and participate only in markets where we
can make a significant contribution. We believe in saying no to thousands of projects, so that we can
really focus on the few that are truly important and meaningful to us. We believe in deep collaboration
and cross-pollination of our groups, which allow us to innovate in a way that others cannot. And
frankly, we dont settle for anything less than excellence in every group in the company, and we have
the self- honesty to admit when were wrong and the courage to change. And I think regardless of who
is in what job those values are so embedded in this company that Apple will do extremely well.
Apples vision statement is considerably detailed and reflects the companys comprehensive approach
in ensuring continued growth and success. For instance, the vision statement enumerates a number of
major points, such as the emphasis on innovation, which directly relates with Apples rapid innovation
strategy. In addition, the vision statement specifies simplicity, which is also an integral aspect of the
companys approach to product design and development. Apple is known for user-friendly and easyto-use products that help improve daily activities. For instance, the simplicity of the design of iPhone
and iOS make it easy to communicate, use apps, and access the Internet. Moreover, Apples vision
statement shows careful selection of markets. This factor reflects the firms use of market research to
guide decision-making in product development and strategic formulation. Also, even organizational
culture is included in this vision statement. Apple highlights employees collaboration and excellence
as keys to its business. This detailed vision statement is quite comprehensive in addressing the
different aspects of Apples business. It effectively shows the holistic approach of the companys
leaders. Thus, based on conventions on vision statement construction, Apples vision statement is
satisfactory because it clearly shows the direction of the company. This direction is stated for the
business as a whole, as well as the various aspects or components of Apples organization. Such a
detailed vision statement is beneficial to business because it helps guide decision-makers and other
employees in working toward the desired condition, which in this case is a condition of Apples
continued global success based on excellence and innovation.
SWOT ANALYSIS
Strengths
Strong brand image
Customer loyalty
High customer switching costs
Research and Development
Outstanding financial performance
Frequent product introduction
Weaknesses
Dependence on the third party software developers
Products and services experience quality problems from time to
time(inconsistency).
Opportunities
Increasing demand in emerging foreign markets, for example, China and India
Retail store expansion
Increase lifestyle brand image
Threats
Intense competition in the industry
Intellectual rights infringement.
Political events, terrorism, etc
They use both corporate relatedness and operational relatedness. Their human resources is
very important to them, and they use a lot of the same people in more than one business.
They have something between moderate and high level of diversification, with related
constrains. All of their businesses are in the same area.
This is a value-creating diversification, because it gets harder for their competitors to
understand why they are doing so well, and since they have a lot of both tangible and less
tangible resources that can be used in a lot, or all of their business, this can lead to economics
of scope.
Apple: Design, Integration and Outsourcing
From its target marketing, research and product design, Apple is a much more focused
company than Samsung. It is also a much more profitable company. Apple succeeds on
design and integration, and no small degree of risk. All of Apple's products include programs
that work very well with each other, but not with any of competitors' products, which makes
it easy for customers to keep buying Apple and difficult to switch to someone else. Nearly
three-quarters of Apple's revenue comes from the iPhone lineup, making the firm single
product-dependent.
Able to suppress R&D costs by outsourcing hardware component production and assembly,
Apple's CapEx look radically different from Samsung's. This inflates margins and boosts
Apple stock, and is one of the chief reasons Apple can grow at astounding clips.
Apple does not race to be first; it lets other companies spend time on R&D and early market
development before swooping in and improving everything. Consider the iPod, the first
breakthrough product during Jobs' second stint as CEO, which came out years after the Sony
Walkman. Not content to just throw out an imitator product, Apple worked diligently with
record labels and created a small, sleek-looking replacement. There are similar stories with
the smartphone and tablet markets, each considered pillars of Apple innovation but neither of
which the company invented.
listen, and to make music. To make these programs, they have to have to focus
on innovation, and have programmers and designers that can make program like
this, that are both easy to use, beautiful to look at, and can do everything you
can expect from programs like these.
After Steve Jobs relinquished his position as CEO of Apple, the succeeding CEO
became Tim Cook who has seemingly adopted a new business model for Apple
that is not necessarily akin to Steve Jobs. While Tim Cook also believes in Steve
Jobs former method of new and innovative products, he has been utilizing
Apples significantly sized market share of loyal customers in order to provide
only incrementally changed products while knowing the companys large and
loyal user base will upgrade to the newest devices being produced.
Dr. Panos Mourdoukoutas asserts that, Under Tim Cook, Apple has been
churning out new versions of old products that are destined to reach their limits,
as was the case with Sonys (NYSE:SNE) products in the early 2000s. Tim Cooks
Apple has yet to launch a new product that may replace the iPhone, the iPad and
the MacBook. The business model of Apple has shifted from the Steve Jobs to
the Tim Cook era; Steve Jobs emphasized the construction of brand new
innovative technologies whereas Tim Cook has only been producing slightly
improved versions of existent Apple products.
Under Tim Cook, Apple has focused more on strengthening its already created
products. Where Jobs was building up a company that almost declared
bankruptcy, Cook took over a juggernaut in the tech market meaning it was a
much different company than when Jobs was CEO. So far, he has focused on
tweaking the already existing products that Apple has released. For example,
instead of having any true innovation with the newly released iPhone 5, Cook
focused on tightening up many aspects of the existing smartphone model, i.e.
the iPhone 4; he increased its size, allowing it to compete with other larger
phones such as those created by rival Samsung and cut Apples contract with
Google for its Maps service and replaced it with a proprietary map system. While
there have been problems with the new map service initially, the move allowed
Apple to rely less on Google and shore up its own service platform, which will pay
off in the future.
As a result of these two differing philosophies, a pattern has arisen within Apple,
which has turned into a 2-3 year cycle for significantly new and improved
products. The first product that is released is the large new hardware upgrade.
This upgrade brings new changes such as larger screen, better camera, faster
processor, etc. Around a year later, Apple then releases an updated version of
this hardware, mostly consisting of slight upgrades and new chips. Apple often
adds a keynote new feature to each iPhone release along with a hardware
upgrade, e.g. Siri, cloud storage, etc. In essence, the 2-3 year cycle of large
hardware upgrades is interspersed with small yearly hardware/software upgrades
Differentiation strategy
Focuses on high quality and innovation
Offers strong graphic performance with great design
Creates brand loyalty
Products can be imitated at a lower cost structure
than Apple focuses on superior quality and
innovation focuses on superior quality and
innovation
Samsung is a diverse business with chips, displays, and other technology. This
pays dividends, allowing it to compete on price and increasingly, offer features
Apple hasn't gotten to. Although, many would argue that Apple chooses not to
include certain features Samsung offers.
When Samsung wants to get behind something, it can do so with considerable
weight.
That's certainly been the case for its flagship Galaxy phones. Samsung's
advertising push has been absolutely massive. In the U.S., where the iPhone is
still pretty dominant, last year the company increased its advertising budget
five-fold, to $401 million from $78 million. That's $68 million ahead of Apple, and
more than $200 million ahead of its nearest competitor in the Android market.
And that's only a fraction of its ad budget.
This push has paid off too, with Samsung scoring many points at Apple's
expense.
Supply chain and distribution
Samsung is so much more than a smartphone-maker. It is a conglomerate, a
manufacturer, and the world's largest chip-maker. It makes many of the
components that go into its smartphones giving it a cost advantage and allowing
it to be much more flexible in terms of what it produces and when.
Apple, on the other hand, though it has a diverse, well-managed, and futuristic
supply chain, relies on external partners, which can lead to delays and
difficulties.
And though Apple is trying to move away from Samsung chips, the company's
smartphone competitors still have to buy them. In a way, they help finance its
cost advantage.
As Christopher Mims at Quartz points out, the company also has a huge
advantage in distribution. The company's new Galaxy S4 will be available on 36
percent more carriers and in 55 percent more countries than the iPhone 5.
Samsung's in more places than Apple with a brand new phone, as well as lower
end options for the developing world.
The management lesson: You have to commit
Samsung is very much a Korean company, and has been, at times, accused of
being overly hierarchical and dominated by its founding family. That also
provides some advantages. You can fault some things the company does, but not
its ambition or commitment.
When Samsung decides to get into a business, it goes hard. Within the past
decade, it went from just beginning to invest in making batteries for digital
devices and flash memory to being a global leader.
Former P&G CEO A.G. Lafley argues that companies fail because they're hesitant
to make decisions and hesitant to commit because they fear failure and want
simply to play rather than win.
Samsung wants to be the dominant player in the smartphone market, it has a
strategy to do so, and it's using every tool it has as it attempts to succeed at it.
Apple and Samsung, notably, utilize very different business strategies and
models within the marketplace; Apple releases few but highly anticipated highend products while Samsung inundates the market with a wide variety of
products.
Apple Vs. Samsung: Endless Patent Lawsuits
The most acerbic interactions between Samsung and Apple take place in
intellectual property rights court, where Apple has repeatedly reached into its
bag of litigation tricks to assail Samsung for patent infringement. Lawsuits are a
common strategy from Apple, which is one of the most legally aggressive firms in
the world, but the focus on Samsung is particularly repetitive and intense.
The future
The key test of whether Samsung can move from a close-and-gaining second to
becoming truly dominant is whether it can deliver products that are truly gamechanging. To really start pulling customers away from iPhones in droves, it needs
to differentiate itself beyond marketing and a bigger screen.
It's aggressively investing in Silicon Valley with several big campuses to help it
start to lead in software as it already does with hardware.