Nature 17969
Nature 17969
Nature 17969
doi:10.1038/nature17969
Yale Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Yale University, 52 Hillhouse Avenue, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA. 2European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2, 85748
Garching bei Mnchen, Germany. 3ASTRON, Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy, PO Box 2, 7990 AA Dwingeloo, The Netherlands. 4Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, Niels
Borhweg 2, NL-2333 CA Leiden, The Netherlands. 5Laboratory for Studies of Radiation and Matter in Astrophysics and Atmospheres (LERMA), Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University,
College de France, CNRS, Sorbonne University, Paris, France. 6Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada. 7School of Physics and
Astronomy, Rochester Institute of Technology, 84 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, New York 14623, USA. 8Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science, Rochester Institute of Technology,
84 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, New York 14623, USA. 9Physics and Astronomy Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-2320, USA. 10Physics and Astronomy
Department, Waterloo University, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 2GL, Canada. 11School of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University, The Parade, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK.
12
Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA. 13Department of Physics,
Durham University, Durham DHL 3LE, UK. 14Naval Research Laboratory Remote Sensing Division, Code 7213, 4555 Overlook Avenue Southwest, Washington DC 20375, USA. 15Instituto de
Radioastronoma y Astrofsica, UNAM, Apartado Postal 3-72 (Xangari), 58089 Morelia, Michoacn, Mexico. 16H. W. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8
1TL, UK. 17Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge University, Madingly Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK. 18Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 1085 South University Avenue, Ann
Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA. 19Laboratoire AIM-Paris-Saclay, CEA/DSM/Irfu CNRSUniversit Paris Diderot, CE-Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France. 20Department of Physics and Astronomy,
University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA. 21Max-Planck-Institut fr Extraterrestrische Physik, 85748 Garching bei Mnchen, Germany.
2 1 8 | NAT U R E | VO L 5 3 4 | 9 J U N E 2 0 1 6
LETTER RESEARCH
a
Rapidly cooling
X-ray atmosphere
B: X-ray
Y: Optical
R: H
Radio
contours
30 kpc (20)
b Ly
0.1
0.5
0.9
Cool gas
Young stars
5 kpc (3.3)
RESEARCH LETTER
2
b
0.1
Total CO(21)
profile
15
0
10
Beam size
(1 kpc by
0.8 kpc)
0.1
0
25
c
Redshifted continuum absorption
at +240, +275, +335 km s1
12.5
12.5
Continuum
absorption
on nucleus
25
500
+500
+1,000
in our ALMA data. Remarkably, both the optical depth and linewidth of the warm atomic absorption signal varies dramatically across
the jet, with a broad (v310kms1) component co-spatial with the
core that is absent just ~20pc to the northeast, where only a narrow
(v50kms1) Hi line is found at the same redshift. This effectively
requires the inflowing atomic gas to be confined within the innermost
~100pc of the black hole, as gas further out would give rise to an
unchanging absorption signal across the compact jet. The infall velocity
is the same as that for the cold molecular clouds seen in CO(21)
absorption, which means they most probably stem from the same
spatial region, within tens of parsecs of the accreting black hole.
This is further supported by the ALMA data itself. In emission, all
gas around approximately +300kms1 that is conceivably available to
attenuate the continuum signal is confined to the innermost 2kpc about
the nucleus (Fig. 4a, b). The radial dependence of molecular cloud
volume number density within this region is uncertain, but probably
steeper than r1, and likely to be closer to r2 (Fig. 4b). This means that
the chances of a random line of sight crossing will drop with increasing
distance from the black hole. If the gas volume density goes as r2, a
cloud 100pc from the black hole is ten times more likely to cross our
line of sight than a cloud at a galactocentric distance of 1kpc. It would
be exceedingly unlikely for three such clouds to cross our line of sight
to the black hole were they spread over several kiloparsecs throughout
the galaxys outskirts.
The data therefore serve as strong observational evidence for an
inward-moving, clumpy distribution of molecular clouds within a few
CO(21) at 300 km s1
2 kpc
50 pc
Molecular
2 absorption
0.01
250
0
+250 +500
Velocity (km s1)
mJy per beam
20
25
400
16 mas 7 mas
Core
0
4
Narrow H I
absorption
400
0 +250
Broad H I
6
absorption
0 +250
+600 400
Velocity (km s1)
+600
2 2 0 | NAT U R E | VO L 5 3 4 | 9 J U N E 2 0 1 6
LETTER RESEARCH
8. Sharma, P., McCourt, M., Quataert, E. & Parrish, I. J. Thermal instability and the
feedback regulation of hot haloes in clusters, groups, and galaxies. Mon. Not. R.
Astron. Soc. 420, 31743194 (2012).
9. Gaspari, M., Ruszkowski, M. & Oh, S. P. Chaotic cold accretion on to black holes.
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 432, 34013422 (2013).
10. Li, Y. & Bryan, G. L. Modeling active galactic nucleus feedback in cool-core
clusters: the formation of cold clumps. Astrophys. J. 789, 153 (2014).
11. McNamara, B. R. et al. Discovery of ghost cavities in the X-ray atmosphere of
Abell 2597. Astrophys. J. 562, L149L152 (2001).
12. Clarke, T. E., Sarazin, C. L., Blanton, E. L., Neumann, D. M. & Kassim, N. E.
Low-frequency radio observations of X-ray ghost bubbles in A2597: a history
of radio activity in the core. Astrophys. J. 625, 748753 (2005).
13. Tremblay, G. R. et al. Multiphase signatures of active galactic nucleus feedback
in Abell 2597. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 424, 10261041 (2012).
14. Gaspari, M., Brighenti, F. & Temi, P. Chaotic cold accretion on to black holes in
rotating atmospheres. Astron. Astrophys. 579, A62 (2015).
15. Tremblay, G. R. et al. Residual cooling and persistent star formation amid
active galactic nucleus feedback in Abell 2597. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 424,
10421060 (2012).
16. ODea, C. P., Baum, S. A. & Gallimore, J. F. Detection of extended H I absorption
toward PKS 2322123 in Abell 2597. Astrophys. J. 436, 669677 (1994).
17. Taylor, G. B., ODea, C. P., Peck, A. B. & Koekemoer, A. M. H I Absorption toward
the nucleus of the radio galaxy PKS 2322123 in A2597. Astrophys. J. 512,
L27L30 (1999).
18. ODea, C. P., Baum, S. A., Mack, J., Koekemoer, A. M. & Laor, A. Hubble Space
Telescope STIS far-ultraviolet observations of the central nebulae in the
cooling-core clusters A1795 and A2597. Astrophys. J. 612, 131151 (2004).
19. Oonk, J. B. R., Hatch, N. A., Jaffe, W., Bremer, M. N. & van Weeren, R. J.
Far-ultraviolet emission in the A2597 and A2204 brightest cluster galaxies.
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 414, 23092336 (2011).
20. Tremblay, G. R. et al. Far-ultraviolet morphology of star-forming filaments in
cool core brightest cluster galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 451, 37683800
(2015).
21. Salom, P. et al. A very extended molecular web around NGC 1275. Astron.
Astrophys. 531, A85 (2011).
22. Jaffe, W., Bremer, M. N. & Baker, K. H II and H2 in the envelopes of cooling flow
central galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 360, 748762 (2005).
23. Salom, P. et al. Cold molecular gas in the Perseus cluster core. Association
with X-ray cavity, H filaments and cooling flow. Astron. Astrophys. 454,
437445 (2006).
24. Smith, E. P., Heckman, T. M. & Illingworth, G. D. Stellar dynamics of powerful
radio galaxies. Astrophys. J. 356, 399415 (1990).
25. Larson, R. B. Turbulence and star formation in molecular clouds. Mon. Not. R.
Astron. Soc. 194, 809826 (1981).
26. Solomon, P. M., Rivolo, A. R., Barrett, J. & Yahil, A. Mass, luminosity, and line
width relations of Galactic molecular clouds. Astrophys. J. 319, 730741
(1987).
27. Wiklind, T. & Combes, F. Molecular absorption and its time variations in
Centaurus A. Astron. Astrophys. 324, 5164 (1997).
28. Espada, D. et al. Disentangling the circumnuclear environs of Centaurus A.
II. On the nature of the broad absorption line. Astrophys. J. 720, 666678 (2010).
29. David, L. P. et al. Molecular gas in the X-ray bright group NGC 5044 as revealed
by ALMA. Astrophys. J. 792, 94 (2014).
30. Urry, C. M. & Padovani, P. Unified schemes for radio-loud active galactic nuclei.
Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 107, 803845 (1995).
Acknowledgements ALMA is a partnership of ESO (representing its member
states), NSF (USA) and NINS (Japan), together with NRC (Canada) and NSC
and ASIAA (Taiwan), in cooperation with the Republic of Chile. The Joint
ALMA Observatory is operated by ESO, AUI/NRAO and NAOJ. We are grateful
to the European ALMA Regional Centres, particularly those in Garching and
Manchester, for their dedicated end-to-end support of data associated with
this paper. We thank R. Larson for discussions. G.R.T. acknowledges support
from National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) through Einstein
Postdoctoral Fellowship Award Number PF-150128, issued by the Chandra
X-ray Observatory Center, which is operated by the Smithsonian Astrophysical
Observatory for and on behalf of NASA under contract NAS8-03060.
F.C. acknowledges the European Research Council (ERC) for the Advanced
Grant Program no. 267399-Momentum. B.R.M. is supported by a grant from
the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. T.A.D.
acknowledges support from a Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
Ernest Rutherford Fellowship. A.C.E. acknowledges support from STFC grant
ST/L00075X/1. A.C.F. and H.R.R. acknowledge support from ERC Advanced
Grant Program no. 340442-Feedback. M.N.B. acknowledges funding from the
STFC. Basic research in radio astronomy at the Naval Research Laboratory is
supported by 6.1 Base funding.
Author Contributions G.R.T. was principal investigator on the original proposal,
performed the data analysis, and wrote the paper. J.B.R.O., T.A.D., R.G.M. and
A.M. were substantially involved in planning both scientific and technical
aspects of the proposal, while T.A.D. and R.G.M. contributed ALMA data
reduction and analysis expertise once the data were obtained. J.B.R.O.,
F.C. and P.S. invested substantial time in analysis of the data. Substantial
scientific feedback was also provided over many months by F.C., J.B.R.O., C.P.O.,
S.A.B., G.M.V., M.D., B.R.M., M.A.M., T.E.C., H.R., A.C.E. and A.C.F., while all other
co-authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Author Information This paper makes use of the following ALMA data:
ADS/JAO.ALMA#2012.1.00988.S. Reprints and permissions information
is available at www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing
financial interests. Readers are welcome to comment on the online version of
the paper. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to
G.R.T. (grant.tremblay@yale.edu).
9 J U N E 2 0 1 6 | VO L 5 3 4 | NAT U R E | 2 2 1
RESEARCH LETTER
METHODS
Observations, data reduction, and analysis. The new ALMA data presented in this
paper were obtained in Cycle 1 with the use of 29 operational antennae in the 12m
Array. ALMAs Band 6 heterodyne receivers were tuned to a frequency of 213GHz,
sensitive to the J=21 rotational line transition of carbon monoxide at the redshift
of the Abell 2597 BCG (z=0.0821). The ALMA correlator, set to Frequency Division
Mode (FDM), delivered a bandwidth of 1,875MHz (per baseband) with a 0.488MHz
channel spacing, for a maximum spectral resolution of about 2km s1. One baseband
was centred on the CO(21) emission line, while the other three sampled the local
continuum. Maximum antenna baselines extended to ~1km, delivering an angular
resolution at 213GHz of ~0.7 within a ~28 primary beam (field of view). ALMA
observed the Abell 2597 BCG, located at RA 23h 25min 20s, dec. 12 07 38
(J2000), for a total of ~3h over three separate scheduling blocks executed between
17 and 19 November 2013. The planet Neptune and quasars J22582758 and
J23311556 were used for amplitude, flux, and phase calibration. The data were
reduced using CASA version 4.2 with calibration and imaging scripts kindly provided
by the ALMA Regional Centers (ARCs) in both Garching, Germany and Manchester,
UK. Beyond the standard application of the phase calibrator solution, we iteratively
performed self-calibration of the data using the galaxys own continuum, yielding a
~14% decrease in RMS noise to a final value of 0.16mJy per 0.7150.533 beam
per 40kms1 channel. There is effectively no difference in CO(21) morphology
between the self-calibrated and non-self-calibrated data cubes. Measurement sets were
imaged using natural visibility weighting and binning to either 5km s1, 10kms1,
or 40kms1, as indicated in the figure legends. The figures presented in this Letter
show only continuum-subtracted, pure CO(21) line emission. The rest-frame
230GHz continuum observation is dominated by a bright (13.6mJy) point source
associated with the AGN (detected at 400), serving as the bright backlight against
which the continuum absorption features presented in this Letter were observed. The
continuum data also features compact (~5kpc) extended emission at ~10 that
extends along the galaxys dust lane, to be discussed in a forthcoming paper.
Adoption of a systemic velocity. Interpretation of gas motions relative to the stellar
component of a galaxy requires adoption of a systemic (stellar) velocity to be used
as a zero point marking the transition from blue- to redshift. All CO(21) line
velocities discussed in this Letter are set relative to 213.04685GHz, where observed
CO(21) emission peaks. This frequency corresponds to 12CO(21) (rest-frame
230.538001GHz) at a redshift of z=0.0821. This redshift is consistent, conservatively
within 60kms1, with every other available multiwavelength tracer of the galaxys
systemic velocity, including prominent Ca ii H, K, and G-band absorption features17
that directly trace the galaxy stellar component, the redshift of all optical emission
lines31, as well as a broad (FWHM 412km s1) Hi absorption component16 at the
optical emission and absorption line redshift. It is also consistent, within ~60km s1,
with a cross-correlation of emission and absorption lines using galaxy template
spectra17, as well as with all other published reports of the galaxys systemic velocity
(found, for example, within the HyperLeda database). We are therefore certain that the
reported redshift of the absorption features discussed in this Letter indeed corresponds
to real motion relative to the galaxys stellar component. Without caveat or ambiguity,
the absorbing cold clouds are moving into the galaxy at roughly ~30060kms1.
Mass estimates. All molecular gas masses estimated in this letter adopt the
following relation32:
1.05 10 4
X CO
Mmol =
cm2
3.2
20
2 10 K km s1
1 S v D 2
L
CO
1 + z Jy km s1 Mpc M
where SCOv is the emission integral (effectively the total CO flux over the region
of interest), z is the galaxy redshift (z=0.0821), and DL its luminosity distance
(373.3 Mpc), for which we assume a flat CDM model wherein H0=70kms1
Mpc1, M=0.3, and =0.7. This mass estimate most critically relies on an
assumption of the CO-to-H2 conversion factor32, XCO. In this Letter we assume the
average Milky Way value of XCO=21020cm2 (K km s1)1 and a CO(21) to
CO(10) flux density ratio of 3.2. Other authors have provided extensive discussion
of these assumptions as they pertain to cool core BCGs29,33,34. Scientific conclusions
in this paper are largely insensitive to choice of XCO.
A single Gaussian fit to the CO(21) spectrum extracted from an aperture containing all detected emission yields an emission integral of S COv = 4.2 0.4 Jy
km s1 with a line FWHM of 25214kms1, corresponding to a total molecular
hydrogen (H2) gas mass of M H 2 = (1.80 0.19) 109 M. This is very close to
the previously reported15 mass, based on an IRAM 30m CO(21) observation, of
(1.8 0.3)109 M. This comparison is not one-to-one, as the mass from the
IRAM 30m observation was computed from within a beam size of 11 (rather than
28 for the ALMA data), and used a CO(21)/CO(10) flux ratio of 4 (rather than
3.2, as we use here). These differences are minor, particularly because nearly all of
the CO(21) emission detected by ALMA is found within the central 11 size of
the IRAM 30m beam. It is therefore safe to say that our ALMA observation has
detected nearly all emission that was detected in the single-dish IRAM 30m observation, and that very little extended emission has been resolved out by ALMA.
Estimating physical properties of the redshifted absorbing molecular gas. We
have estimated a rough upper-limit size of the absorbing clouds assuming the
widely adopted Larson et al.25 and Solomon et al.26 sizelinewidth relation for
molecular clouds in the Milky Way (namely, the ref. 26 fit);
Mcloud
R cloudv2
20pc (6 km s1)2
1.7 105 M
1
1 2
G
4.302 103 pc M
(km s )
where Rcloud is the cloud radius (as roughly estimated above) and v is its velocity
dispersion (also as above).
CO(21) optical depths for the absorbers were estimated by assuming that:
r 2 NH
M 109M fc
10 22cm2
1 kpc
where fc is the covering factor and r is the radius of an imaginary thin spherical shell
of molecular gas with column density NH. If such a shell had a covering factor of 1,
a radius of 1kpc, and a column density of 1022cm2, then the total mass of molecular hydrogen contained within that shell would be roughly one billion solar masses.
A column density in excess of 1022cm2 requires this distribution to be contained
within a sphere of radius <<1 kpc, lest the limit set by the total mass of molecular
hydrogen in the galaxy be violated. If the characteristic column density is 1023cm2,
for example, this mass must be contained within a sphere of radius 300 pc, or else its
total mass would exceed the 1.8109 M of cold gas present in the galaxy.
Codes, software, and data availability. Codes that we have written to both reduce
and analyse the data presented in this Letter have been made publicly available at https://github.com/granttremblay/Tremblay_Nature_ALMA_Abell2597.
Reduction of the data as well as some simple modelling (for example, fitting of
Gaussians to lines) was performed using routines included in CASA version 4.2,
available at https://casa.nrao.edu/. Plots were made using both Pythons
MatPlotLib and Veusz, which is available at http://home.gna.org/veusz/.
31. Voit, G. M. & Donahue, M. A deep look at the emission-line nebula in Abell
2597. Astrophys. J. 486, 242 (1997).
32. Bolatto, A. D., Wolfire, M. & Leroy, A. K. The CO-to-H2 conversion factor. Annu.
Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 51, 207268 (2013).
33. McNamara, B. R. et al. A 1010 solar mass flow of molecular gas in the A1835
brightest cluster galaxy. Astrophys. J. 785, 44 (2014).
34. Russell, H. R. et al. Massive molecular gas flows in the A1664 brightest cluster
galaxy. Astrophys. J. 784, 78 (2014).