Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

C Interview Questions and Answers: Why Doesn't The Following Code Give The Desired Result?

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

C Interview Questions And Answ ers

[C Frequently

Asked Questions ,C FAQ ]

Why doesn't the following code give the desired result?


int x = 3000, y = 2000 ;
long int z = x * y ;
Here the multiplication is carried out between two ints x and y, and the result that
would overflow would be truncated before being assigned to the variable z of type
long int. However, to get the correct output, we should use an explicit cast to force
long arithmetic as shown below:
long int z = ( long int ) x * y ;
Note that ( long int )( x * y ) would not give the desired effect.

Why doesn't the following statement work?


char str[ ] = "Hello" ;
strcat ( str, '!' ) ;
The string function strcat( ) concatenates strings and not a character. The basic
difference between a string and a character is that a string is a collection of
characters, represented by an array of characters whereas a character is a single
character. To make the above statement work writes the statement as shown below:
strcat ( str, "!" ) ;

How do I know how many elements an array can hold?


The amount of memory an array can consume depends on the data type of an
array. In DOS environment, the amount of memory an array can consume depends
on the current memory model (i.e. Tiny, Small, Large, Huge, etc.). In general an
array cannot consume more than 64 kb. Consider following program, which shows
the maximum number of elements an array of type int, float and char can have in
case of Small memory model.
main( )

int i[32767] ;
float f[16383] ;
char s[65535] ;

}
How do I write code that reads data at memory location specified by segment
and offset?
Use peekb( ) function. This function returns byte(s) read from specific segment and
offset locations in memory. The following program illustrates use of this function. In
this program from VDU memory we have read characters and its attributes of the
first row. The information stored in file is then further read and displayed using
peek( ) function.
#include <stdio.h>

#include <dos.h>
main( )
{
char far *scr = 0xB8000000 ;
FILE *fp ;
int offset ;
char ch ;
if ( ( fp = fopen ( "scr.dat", "wb" ) ) == NULL )
{
printf ( "\nUnable to open file" ) ;
exit( ) ;
}
// reads and writes to file
for ( offset = 0 ; offset < 160 ; offset++ )
fprintf ( fp, "%c", peekb ( scr, offset ) ) ;
fclose ( fp ) ;
if ( ( fp = fopen ( "scr.dat", "rb" ) ) == NULL )
{
printf ( "\nUnable to open file" ) ;
exit( ) ;
}
// reads and writes to file
for ( offset = 0 ; offset < 160 ; offset++ )
{
fscanf ( fp, "%c", &ch ) ;
printf ( "%c", ch ) ;
}
fclose ( fp ) ;

}
What is conversion operator?
class can have a public method for specific data type conversions.
for example:
class Boo

double value;
public:
Boo(int i )
operator double()
{
return value;

};
Boo BooObject;

double i = BooObject; // assigning object to variable i of type double. now


conversion operator gets called to assign the value.

What is diff between malloc()/free() and new/delete?


malloc allocates memory for object in heap but doesn't invoke object's constructor
to initiallize the object.
new allocates memory and also invokes constructor to initialize the object.
malloc() and free() do not support object semantics
Does not construct and destruct objects
string * ptr = (string *)(malloc (sizeof(string)))
Are not safe
Does not calculate the size of the objects that it construct
Returns a pointer to void
int *p = (int *) (malloc(sizeof(int)));
int *p = new int;
Are not extensible
new and delete can be overloaded in a class
"delete" first calls the object's termination routine (i.e. its destructor) and then
releases the space the object occupied on the heap memory. If an array of objects
was created using new, then delete must be told that it is dealing with an array by
preceding the name with an empty []:Int_t *my_ints = new Int_t[10];
...
delete []my_ints;

what is the diff between "new" and "operator new" ?


"operator new" works like malloc.

What is difference between template and macro??


There is no way for the compiler to verify that the macro parameters are of
compatible types. The macro is expanded without any special type checking.
If macro parameter has a postincremented variable ( like c++ ), the increment is
performed two times.
Because macros are expanded by the preprocessor, compiler error messages will
refer to the expanded macro, rather than the macro definition itself. Also, the
macro will show up in expanded form during debugging.

for example:
Macro:
#define min(i, j) (i < j ? i : j)
template:
template<class T>
T min (T i, T j)
{
return i < j ? i : j;

You might also like