Sanchez V People

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plaintiff-appellee, vs. ANTONIO L.
SANCHEZ, ARTEMIO
AVERION, LANDRITO DING PERADILLAS and LUIS CORCOLON, accused.
FACTS:
Dr. Velecina is a political opponent of accused, Antonio Sanchez for the mayoralty
seat of Calauan, Laguna. Malabanan, the witness along with the Averion, Peradillas
and Corcolon went to the Bishop compound in Calauan, Laguna as part of the
security force of Mayor Sanchez. Peradillas, informed Mayor Sanchez that there will
be a birthday party on Dr. Velecinas place and Nealson Pealosas will be present at
the said party. In response, Mayor Sanchez replied Bahala na kayo mga
anak. Ayusin lang ninyo ang trabaho, and left the premises. Peradillas, Corcolon
and Averion acquired two-way radios and a vehicle for the operation. Malabanan
and the three accused boarded the car and went to Marpori Poultry Farm in
Barangay Lanot, near Dr. Velecinas house. Peradillas alighted and walked towards
his own house, near Dr. Velecinas house, to check whether Nelson Pealosa was at
the party. Peradillas informed the occupants of the car that Nelson Pealosas jeep
was leaving the Velecina compound. Accused Averion immediately drove the car to
the front of Peradillas house and the latter hopped in the cars back seat. Corcolon
sat in the front seat beside him; witness Malabanan sat at the left side of the
backseat and Peradillas stayed at the right side of the back seat. The group pursued
Pealosas jeep. When the accuseds car was passing Victoria Farms, located about
100 meters from Pealosa compound, Corcolon ordered Averion to overtake Pealosas
jeep. As the car overtook the jeep, Peradillas and Corcolon fired at Pealosas jeep,
using M-16 and baby armalite rifles, executed in automatic firing mode. There were
three bursts of gunfire. Based on the sketch prepared by Malabanan, illustrating the
relative position of their car and Nelsons jeep at the time of the shooting, the
assailants were at the left side of the jeep. Rickson Pealosa, son of Nelson Pealosa,
fell from the jeep. The jeep, however, continued running in a zigzag position until it
overturned in front of Irais Farm. After the shooting, the accused proceeded to the
house of mayor Sanchez in Bai, Laguna, and reported to mayor Sanchez that
Pealosa was already dead.
ISSUE:
WON the act of shooting the victims using armalites in automatic firing mode
constitutes a single act and, thus, the felonies resulting therefrom are considered as
complex crimes.
HELD:
The court ruled that several shots from a Thompson sub-machine, in view of its
special mechanism causing several deaths, although caused by a single act of
pressing the trigger, are considered several acts. Although each burst of shots was
caused by one single act of pressing the trigger of the sub-machinegun, in view of
its special mechanism the person firing it has only to keep pressing the trigger of
the sub-machinegun, with his finger and it would fire continually. Hence, it is not the
act of pressing the trigger which should be considered as producing the several
felonies, but the number of bullets which actually produced them. In the instant
case, Malabanan testified that he heard three bursts of gunfire from the two
armalites used by accused Corcolon and Peradillas. Thus, the accused are criminally
liable for as many offenses resulting from pressing the trigger of the
armalites. Therefore, accused are liable for two counts of murder committed against
the victims, Nelson and Rickson Pealosa, instead of the complex crime of double
murder.
Treachery was present in the execution of the crimes. The attack against the
victims, who were unarmed, was sudden, catching them unaware and giving them
no opportunity to defend themselves
Conspiracy is likewise adequately established. Notwithstanding the fact that mayor
Sanchez was not at the crime scene, we are convinced that he was not only a coconspirator, he was the mastermind of the ambush slayings or the principal by
inducement. Malabanan testified that Nelson Pealosa was killed upon order of
mayor Sanchez. After the commission of the crime, the assailants reported to mayor
Sanchez. In conspiracy, it is not necessary to show that all the conspirators actually
hit and killed the victim. What is important is that the participants performed
specific acts with such closeness and coordination as unmistakably to indicate a
common purpose or design in bringing about the death of the victim. Conspiracy
renders appellants liable as co-principals regardless of the extent and character of
their participation because in contemplation of law, the act of one conspirator is the
act of all.
Accused specifically used a motor vehicle to execute the crime. Thus, the
aggravating circumstance of use of a motor vehicle must be appreciated.
However, we cannot appreciate the generic aggravating circumstance of nighttime;
while the crime was committed at night, the prosecution failed to show that the
malefactors specifically sought this circumstance to facilitate the criminal design.
The fact that the crime happened at 7:00 in the evening does not indicate that
accused made use of the darkness to conceal the crime and their identities.
RULING:
The Court finds the accused Antonio Sanchez, Landrito Ding Peradillas, Luis
Corcolon, and Artemio Averion GUILTY beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of
MURDER punishable under ART. 48 of the Revised Penal Code and hereby sentences
each of said accused to suffer the penalty of reclusion perpetua and to pay jointly
and severally, the heirs of the victims each the sum of P100,000.00 for the death of
Nelson Pealosa and Rickson Pealosa, P50,000.00 as actual damages and moral
damages of P 50,000.00 and exemplary damages of P30,000.00 and to pay the

costs.

Sanchez V People

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sanchez V People

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sanchez V People

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plaintiff-appellee, vs. ANTONIO L.

damages of P 50,000.00 and exemplary damages of P30,000.00 and to pay the

You might also like