Fire Stopping

Fire Stopping and Penetration Seals
for the Construction Industry

SECOND EDITION
Association for Specialist Fire Protection

Fire Test Study Group

Fire Stopping and Penetration Seals for the Construction Industry
www.asfp.org.uk
INTRODUCTION
The Association for Specialist Fire Protection (ASFP) was formed in 1976.
The objectives of the Association are to encourage, organize, finance, and undertake
research and experimental work related to passive fire protection and to promote the
consideration of all questions affecting the passive fire protection of buildings.
ASFP, Association House, 99 West Street, Farnham, Surrey GU9 7EN
Tel: +44 (0) 1252 739142
Fax: +44 (0) 1252 739140 Website: www.asfp.org.uk
The Fire Test Study Group (UK) (FTSG) is a forum for technical discussions
and liaisons between consulting fire test laboratories involved in producing test and
assessment information for the purposes of building control.
The member laboratories are all UKAS Accredited for testing and the primary
objective of the group is to ensure common technical interpretations of the fire test
standards and a common approach to technical appraisals or assessments of
products which may be made by the members within the terms of Approved
Document B Fire Spread to the Building Regulations 1991.
Members of the FTSG participate on all relevant BSI Committees, the equivalent ISO
CEN technical committees and are involved in the EEC European Commission
technical discussions on harmonization.
FTSG members have strongly supported the publication of this edition of the Red
Book as it provides specifiers and regulatory bodies with an independently validated
comprehensive and concise guide to the performance of materials used to provide
fire protection for the fire stopping and sealing of penetrations in fire rated barriers.
Fire Test Study Group, Holmesfield Road, Warrington, Cheshire, WA1 2DS
Tel: +44 (0) 1925 655116 Fax: +44 (0) 1925 646672
Acknowledgements
The publishers wish to express their appreciation of the work undertaken by

the ASFP Technical Review Panel. The Panel has undertaken the validation
and appraisal of the proprietary data sheets in this publication to maintain its
impartial technical content.
Although care has been taken to ensure, to the best of our knowledge, that all data and information contained
herein is accurate to the extent that it relates to either matters of fact or accepted practice or matters of opinion at
the time of publication, the Association for Specialist Fire Protection Limited nor the Fire Test Study Group assumes
no responsibility for any errors in or misinterpretations of such data and/or information of any loss or damage arising
from or related to its use.
2004 Association for Specialist Fire Protection

ISBN:

www.asfp.org.uk
FIRE STOPPING AND PENETRATION SEALS

FOR THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
Published by:
Association for Specialist Fire Protection (ASFP) in conjunction with the Fire Test Study Group
(FTSG)
Foreword
I am delighted to introduce you to this latest and updated issue of the Red Book
which has been designed to be the definitive guide to the provision of proprietary
materials and systems used to provide fire protection for the fire stopping and
sealing of penetrations in fire separating elements.
The recent European Construction Products Directive will change the way in which
products are tested and assessed and this edition of the Red Book explains the
changes.
The assessment panel of the ASFP judges the suitability of every product included in
this book; users can rest assured these have been tested to the existing BS and/or
BS EN standards. The book also provides details of the proposed EN test methods.
Designers, regulators, fire authorities, building owners and installers can all rely on
this information and the explanatory notes provided by industry experts on all
aspects of the protection requirements.
I extend my congratulations to all those involved with the production of this edition
of the Red Book which provides an authoritative source of guidance on the safe
provision of fire resistance with regard to the sealing of penetrations within
compartmentation elements of buildings.
Brian Robinson CBE, QFSM, FIFireE
PRESIDENT, ASFP

www.asfp.org.uk
Introduction....................................................................................................................2
Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................2
Fire Stopping and Penetration Seals ..............................................................................3
for the Construction Industry.........................................................................................3
Foreword ....................................................................................................................3
Preface............................................................................................................................5
Scope..............................................................................................................................5
Definitions ......................................................................................................................6
Section 1. Fire protection regulations and requirements ............................................9
1.1 Introduction..........................................................................................................9
1.2
Building Regulations .....................................................................................9
1.2.1
England and Wales.................................................................................9
1.2.2
Scotland ................................................................................................10
1.2.3
Northern Ireland ...................................................................................12
1.3
Meeting the need of building regulations ....................................................12
1.4
Recommendations for the specifier for fire stopping and penetration seals 13
1.5
Recommendations for the Main Contractor/Installation Contractor ...........14
1.6
Recommendations for the Building Owner .................................................15
1.7
Health and safety..........................................................................................15
1.8
Third Party Certification/Accreditation and Certificates of Conformity.....15
Section 2. Test and Appraisal Principles .....................................................................17
2.1
Introduction..................................................................................................17
2.1.1
European testing and this publication..................................................17
2.1.2
Relationship with statutory provisions .................................................19
2.2
Appraisal Principles for Penetration Sealing Systems .................................20
2.2.1
The Assessment Report........................................................................20
2.3
Extended application principles for generic seal types ...............................24
Section 3. How to use this Guide .................................................................................31
3.1
Types of penetrations and joints .................................................................31
3.2
Typical applicable products by type of penetration, joint and barrier from
3.1
32
Product Flowchart....................................................................................................34
Examples of Joint Seals ...........................................................................................35
Examples of Penetration Seals .................................................................................36
Examples of Fire (including Cavity) Barrier Systems .............................................37
Section 4. generic Product information .......................................................................38
4.1
Mineral Fibre Batts ......................................................................................38
4.2
Coated Mineral Fibre Batts..........................................................................38
4.3
Foam.............................................................................................................39
4.4
Bags/Pillows ................................................................................................40
4.5 Plugs/blocks .......................................................................................................41
4.6 Pipe closures ......................................................................................................42
4.7 Woven Textiles ..................................................................................................43
4.8 Sealant/Mastic ....................................................................................................43
4.9 Mortars...............................................................................................................44
4.10 Curtain Wall Seals ...........................................................................................45
4.11 Preformed Elastomeric Seals ...........................................................................46

www.asfp.org.uk
PREFACE
This publication has been prepared by members of the ASFP and presents
economical methods for the provision of proprietary materials and systems
used to provide fire protection for the fire stopping and sealing of
penetrations within fire separating elements to provide compliance with
building regulations. It provides a comprehensive guide to proprietary
materials and systems all of which are manufactured and/or marketed by
members of ASFP.
This publication includes information concerning non-rigid fire barriers.
Information on rigid fire barriers is to be found in the ASFP publication Fire
rated non-load bearing partitions which is sometimes referred to as the
purple book.
The information contained in this document has been primarily included to
give the reader guidance with regard to the fire performance of fire stopping
and penetration sealing systems. Limited mention is also made in some cases
of the thermal and acoustic performance of these systems. For more
information concerning the thermal and acoustic performance of the system
reader is advised to contact the relevant manufacturer.
SCOPE
Section 1
Contains background information into why fire stopping is required in general
and in particular with regard to the needs of the building regulations.
Section 2
Contains outline procedures for fire resistance test and assessment
procedures using UK and European methods.
Section 3
Contains an explanation on how to use this document.
Section 4
Contains generic information on the various types of fire stopping that are
available.
Section 5
Contains the system datasheets.

www.asfp.org.uk
DEFINITIONS
Assessment (also referred to as Appraisal): An independent, technical
appraisal of the likely performance of a component or element of construction used

in a specific manner and end use application if it were to be subjected to a standard
fire test.
Blank Penetration Seal: An aperture through a separating element that has

been sealed to maintain the integrity and insulation performance of the separating
element for the duration of the specified fire resistance period.
Cavity Barrier: A construction provided to close a concealed space against
penetration of smoke or flame, or provided to restrict the movement of smoke or

flame/heat within such a space and of greater than 100mm high or wide.
Compartment (fire): A building or part of a building, comprising one or more
rooms, spaces or storeys, constructed to prevent the spread of fire to or from

another part of the same building, or an adjoining building. The basis of
compartmentation is to subdivide buildings into areas of manageable risk, to provide
adequate means of escape, and to provide fire separation for adjoining buildings.
Construction Joints: Gaps left by design during the construction of a building
which requires a rigid or flexible seal to maintain the fire resistance of the structural
element.
Engineering appraisal/judgement: An independent, technical appraisal of
the likely performance of a construction component used in an end use application if

it could be subjected to a standard fire test.
Fire-resisting (fire resistance): The ability of a component or construction of

a building to satisfy, for a stated period of time, some or all of the appropriate
criteria for flame/heat specified in the relevant part of BS 476 or appropriate BS EN
standard (Approved Document B and BS 5588-11).
Fire-resisting partition: An internal non-load bearing vertical dividing structure
designed to resist the spread of fire, heat, and the products of combustion for a
stipulated period of time. Such a partition can include a glazed section or a fire door.
Fire-resisting suspended ceiling: A suspended ceiling designed to contribute
to the overall fire resistance of a floor assembly or to prevent the collapse of steel
beams supporting a floor or roof, for a stipulated period of time. It may also provide
fire resistance as a membrane in the same way as a partition.
Fire Safety Engineering: The application of scientific and engineering principles,
rules [Codes], and expert judgement, based on an understanding of the phenomena

and effects of fire and of the reaction and behaviour of people to fire, to protect
people, property and the environment from the destructive effects of fire.
Fire separating element: A compartment wall, compartment floor, cavity barrier

6

www.asfp.org.uk
and construction enclosing a protected escape route and/or a place of special fire
hazard. (Approved Document Building). It is the means by which the building is
divided into compartments of manageable size and specific area, to ensure secure
containment of fire and smoke for as long as specified.
Fire-stopping: Sealing products that take up imperfections of fit or design
tolerance between the fire-resisting fixed elements of a building to restrict the

passage of fire and smoke. They continue to take up any imperfections of fit at all
times and have the same fire rating as the fixed elements of which they form a part
and/or interface.
Insulation: The resistance to the transfer of excessive heat, i.e. an ability to

provide insulation from high temperatures.
Integrity: The resistance to fire penetration, i.e. an ability to maintain the

integrity of the element.
Linear joint seal: A system designed to maintain a fire separating function or, if
relevant, to accommodate a specified degree of movement and of less than or equal

to 100mm high or wide.
Penetration Sealing System: The assembly consisting of the penetrating item,

service or services and the penetration seal, materials and devices, together with any
supporting construction, designed to maintain the integrity and insulation
performance of the separating element for the duration of the specified fire
resistance period.
Reaction to fire: The performance of a material or system in a fire situation with

regard to the amount and rate of heat evolved, the amount and rate of spread of
flame and the amount and rate of smoke and toxic fume evolved.
Responsible person: The employer, where there is one, and where there is not
it will be the person responsible for the activity undertaken on the premises which
might give rise to a risk to those present. It includes; a) the employer in relation to
any workplace which is to any extent under his control; b) in relation to any premises
where there is no employer
i
ii
iii
the person (whether the occupier or owner of the premises or not) who has
the overall management of the premises; or
where there is no one with overall management responsibility, the occupier of
the premises; or
where neither (i) or (ii) apply, the owner of the premises
Service Supporting Construction: Mechanical support provided in the form of
clips, ties, hangers, ladder racks or trays, or any device designed to carry the load of
the penetrating services.

www.asfp.org.uk
Services: Services consist of cables, conduits, pipes, chimneys, ducts, trunking, air
ventilation systems, fire rated ventilation ducts or fire rated service ducts and shafts.
Smoke barriers: An internal non-load bearing dividing structure designed to resist

the spread of smoke for a stipulated period of time.
Structural fire protection: Products used to insulate the structural frame of a

building or other construction to allow it to retain its required load bearing strength
or limit the core temperature for a stipulated period of time. The time periods may
be stipulated as requirements in building regulations, safety case studies or Safety
designs according to the type of structure involved.

www.asfp.org.uk
SECTION 1. FIRE PROTECTION REGULATIONS

AND REQUIREMENTS
1.1 Introduction
Fire protection is intended to preserve life and property. Effective fire-stopping in fire
resisting separating elements plays a critical role in containing a fire at its source,
thereby reducing its effect on the primary building structure. The degree of spread is
controlled by creating fire-resisting compartments which subdivide the building.
However, a major threat from fire in most building structures occur where concealed
cavities between fire separating walls and floors are interlinked. It is therefore
essential that all openings and gaps are fire-stopped to restrict lateral and vertical
fire spread and to achieve the required degree of containment. Failure to do so may
cause fire to spread uninterrupted in cavities and penetrations in a building.
Mechanical and electrical services by necessity, breach compartment walls and floors
allowing failure of integrity and insulation to occur where gaps around services have
not been adequately fire-stopped. Fire-stopping products must be able to provide
sufficient insulation to the penetrating services, in order to reduce the temperature
rise along conductive materials, in accordance with the required insulation criteria of
the fire separating element. The movement of smoke is also often an under-rated
feature of fires, and needs to be carefully considered when specifying fire-stopping
constructions.
1.2Building Regulations
1.2.1 England and Wales
The Guidance introduction in Approved Document B3 (Internal fire spread
(structure)) of the Building Regulations 1991 for England and Wales states, among
other requirements, that In the Secretary of States view, the requirements of B3
will be met:
a. if the loadbearing elements of structure of the building are capable of
withstanding the effects of fire for an appropriate period without loss of
stability,
b. if the building is sub-divided by elements of fire resisting construction into
compartments
c. if any openings in fire-separating elements are suitably protected in order to
maintain the integrity of the element (i.e. the continuity of the fire
separation); and
d. if any hidden voids in the construction are sealed and subdivided to inhibit
the unseen spread of fire and products of combustion, in order to reduce the
risk of structural failure, and the spread of fire, in so far as they pose a threat
to the safety of people in and around the building.
(Page 61 of Approved Document B3 The Building Regulations 1991 2000 Edition).

www.asfp.org.uk
Section 11.2 of Approved Document B3 goes on to say: If a fire separating element

is to be effective, then every joint, or imperfection of fit, or opening to allow services
to pass through the element, should be adequately protected by sealing or fire
stopping so that the fire resistance of the element is not impaired
Section 11.12 adds, under the heading of Fire-stopping, a requirement that:
Joints between fire separating elements should be fire stopped; and
All openings for pipes, ducts, conduits or cables to pass through any part of a fire
separating element should be:
kept as few in number as possible and

kept as small as practical
fire-stopped (which in the case of a pipe or duct, should allow for thermal
movement)

1.2.2 Scotland
In Scotland Regulation 12.1 of the Building Standard states that
Every building shall be so constructed that, for a reasonable period, in the event of
fire (a) its stability is maintained;
(b) the spread of fire and smoke within the building is inhibited; and
(c) the spread of fire to and from other buildings is inhibited.
Regulation 9 of the Building Standard stipulates that the requirements of the
regulations can be satisfied only by compliance with the relevant standards. The
relevant standards are set out in a series of Technical Standards of which Part D is
the one that deals with Structural Fire Precautions Regulation 9 sets out three ways
by which the requirements of the Regulations can be satisfied:
i)
By compliance with the relevant standards set out in the supporting Technical
Standards; or
ii)
By conforming with provisions which are stated in the Technical Standards to

be deemed to satisfy the relevant standards; or
iii)
By any other means which can be shown to satisfy the relevant standards.
Section 3 of the introduction to Technical Standard D states:-
10

www.asfp.org.uk
To restrict the internal spread of fire, a building may have to be divided into
compartments separated from each other by compartment walls or compartment
floors intended to provide a complete barrier to fire between the compartments. In
practice, the continuity of such walls and floors will have to be breached by openings
for circulation or services and where this occurs special precautions are necessary to
maintain the effectiveness of the barrier. The acceptable size of a compartment for
this purpose is determined by its likely fire load which is, in turn, influenced by the
purpose group of the building, or part of the building, in which it is situated and the
provision, or otherwise, of active fire protection measures.
(Page 5D Technical Standard D Amended September 2001)
Technical Standard D contains a number of provisions that are deemed to satisfy the
standard and for Fire Stopping these are paragraphs D3.14, D4.7, D5.8, D6.7 and
D6.9 of the Amended September 2001 edition) For example see 3.14 paragraph d.
with regard to the fire stopping of service openings.
D3.14*A compartment wall and a compartment floor must have no openings and
must provide a barrier to fire between the parts of a building to be divided, including
any roof space, except
a. for a chimney or flue-pipe which is of suitable construction, so that in the event of
fire the level of fire safety performance required of the compartment wall or
compartment floor is maintained; or
b. where there is an opening in the compartment wall with a suitable self-closing fire
door with the same duration as the compartment wall, except a lockable door to a
cupboard or service duct with a floor area not more than 3 m2 need not be
selfclosing, or
c. where there is an opening in the compartment wall with a shutter with the same
duration as that required of the compartment wall actuated by a fusible link or other
heat sensitive device with a controlled movement mechanism and audible warning
when operated; or
d. where there is a service opening i. which is of suitable construction, or where the services are suitably protected, so
that in the event of fire the level of fire safety performance required of the
compartment wall or compartment floor is maintained, and
ii. which is suitably fire-stopped; or
e. where there is an opening in the compartment floor, which contains a stair only,
other than an escape stair, and/or not more than 2 escalators, and is provided either
i. at compartment floor level with a suitably activated shutter in the plane of the floor
which when closed maintains the level of fire safety performance of the
compartment floor, or
ii. at each floor level, other than the top floor level, with a suitably activated shutter
in the vertical plane which moves to enclose the opening and provide a barrier with
11

www.asfp.org.uk
the fire safety performance equivalent to a compartment wall with the same duration
as the compartment floor.
(Pages 11D and 12D
Technical Standard D Amended September 2001)
1.2.3 Northern Ireland

Technical Booklet E for Northern Ireland closely follows Approved Document B.
In Northern Ireland new Building Regulations came into force in November 1994.
The fire safety requirements for these regulations are supported by Technical
Booklet E, which contains provisions regarding structural fire resistance,
compartmentation, etc. similar to those in the Approved Document for England and
Wales. Unlike the provisions of the Approved Document, which are for guidance, the
use of which is regarded as evidence tending to show that the requirements of the
Building Regulations have been met, the provisions of Technical Booklet E are
deemed to satisfy those requirements. Where the provisions of the Technical Booklet
are not followed then the onus falls on the designer to show that the requirements of
the regulations can be met by other means .
1.3Meeting the need of building regulations
Due to the historic absence of UK or European Standard Test Methods (prEN1366-3/4 has not been issued by CEN at the time of writing), the tests and subsequent
appraisal of systems used for penetration seals are subject to widely varying
interpretations. This inevitably leads to confusion for the specifier, the specialist fire
protection contractor, the system manufacturer and the end user, which may lead to
installations unable to provide the required standard of protection.
There are a wide range of materials and systems available which, if correctly
specified and installed, will prevent the passage of flame/heat and smoke from
passing through a service opening, or joint, for the required period of time. In many
cases however, the sealing or fire stopping of openings or joints in elements of
structure are treated as an afterthought, and are not given the degree of importance
essential for fire protective constructions. There have been many cases where loose
materials have been indiscriminately packed around services in an effort to seal the
opening, but such installations would invariably perform inadequately in a fire.
The purpose of this publication is to provide sufficient information to enable the
specifier, user and subsequent building owner (or his/her agent) to judge each
system on an equal basis, and to avoid the confusion of attempting to establish the
merits of varying test reports and assessments/appraisals.
Various types of systems, their application, the practical advantages and
disadvantages in use, and their performance in fire are described in detail. The
publication is intended to be treated as a User Guide for the supply of materials
and systems that can be used to restrict the passage of flame/heat and smoke
through openings in fire resisting separating elements.
The data sheets, and assessment of relevant information, have been prepared in
accordance with the principles defined in Section 2, and have been checked and
agreed by an independent panel of the Association for Specialist Fire Protection. This
12

www.asfp.org.uk
independent panel consists of representatives from Warrington Fire Research Centre,

Building Research Establishment and Chiltern International Fire (all of whom are
UKAS approved laboratories and FTSG members).
The information contained within this publication, and the details provided in the
data sheets, has therefore been subject to independent technical evaluation on a
strictly equal basis with regard to types of systems, installation methods and
orientation. This is especially important if one considers that, in practice, penetration
seals will be attached to fixed elements of structure such as walls, floors, etc. During
the technical evaluation of the system, the effects of expansion, contraction and
deflection of these elements will also need to be considered, in order to fully
evaluate the fire performance of the penetration seal. Additional information, such as
the load bearing capacity and deformation of the supporting structure, will also need
to be fully evaluated to determine whether or not the construction will provide the
specified period of fire resistance.
It should be noted that the majority of lightweight barrier constructions tend to bow
towards a fire, as the side exposed to the fire expands more than the unexposed
face or cold face. If adequate provision is not made for the relative movement of
the barrier to the penetration seal, it is possible that an integrity failure may occur
within the seal itself, or at the interface of the components used in the seal.
Some penetration sealing systems that are not designed to react/expand in a fire
situation may require the surrounding structure to provide a tight compression fit on
the product for the fire duration.
In areas where seismic activity is a possibility this parameter should be taken into
account when designing the penetration seal or firestopping system. The
manufacturer of the system in question should be consulted for their
recommendations and supporting test and appraisal evidence.
Services passing through unsealed openings in elements of structure may allow
flames/heat and smoke to pass through and create a fire hazard within the building.
Properly constructed penetration sealing systems will however, reduce such hazards
and provide a safer environment for the occupants of a building.
Before agreeing to the installation of penetration sealing systems the user and
specifier will therefore need to:i)
ii)
iii)
establish the effects of such penetration on the integrity and insulation

performance of the fire separating element concerned;
establish the fire performance of the penetration sealing system;
establish the insulation performance of the penetrating service or services, and
where necessary, the integrity failure of the service.
1.4Recommendations for the specifier for fire stopping and penetration

seals
Advice should be sought from both the manufacturer and the specialist contractor at
the earliest possible opportunity regarding the programming, installation sequence,
and suitability before specifying a particular fire stopping and/or penetration sealing
system.
13

www.asfp.org.uk
A number of parties may have reasonable claim to influence the specification

including the building owner, occupier, architect, insurers, fire safety engineer, main
contractor and/or fire protection contractor. The number of interested parties can
give rise to problems not least because they are rarely involved at the same time.
Consequently a specification drawn up by the architect implementing a certain fire
safety strategy may subsequently be changed by others. This is a necessary part of
the process but because of this there is potential for specifications to be inadequate
or to compromise the requirements of the original fire safety strategy. It is therefore
recommended that only a limited and controlled number of parties be authorised to
change the specification and that any changes to the specification be carefully
monitored and recorded. It may be appropriate in the event of a large number of
changes to a specification to have the amended design checked by a competent third
party.
It is recommended that this check should ensure:
The correct location of the fire stopping and penetration seals

That the proposed fire resistance periods are appropriate given the changes
to the design
That the systems specified are appropriate for their end-use
That the systems specified have appropriate test reports/assessments
showing them to be fit for purpose.
That adequate documentation is available for the subsequent building
managers so that they may inspect and maintain the fire stopping and
penetration sealing systems.
1.5Recommendations for the Main Contractor/Installation Contractor

The placing of sub-contracts is a vital element in the installation of fire stopping
and/or penetration seal systems and the Main Contractor should have in mind his/her
legal responsibility to ensure that all such work is correctly undertaken. It should not
be assumed that responsibility in the event of failure can automatically be passed to
a sub-contractor. The Main Contractor should be totally satisfied as to the
competence of sub-contractors where life-safety, as is the case with fire stopping
and/or penetration sealing systems, is involved.
In some cases the work of installing fire stopping and/or penetration sealing systems
around penetrations in compartment walls and floors has traditionally been included
in the scope of work for each of the service trade contractors. This traditional
approach can raise problems because of interface between trades, and sometimes
the system installation has been left to untrained personnel. An alternative approach,
which has proved successful, is to remove the installation of the fire stopping and/or
penetration sealing systems from the scope of work of the service trades, and
appoint a competent specialist contractor to carry out all this work throughout the
project.
The Main Contractor can identify competent contractors for the work concerned from
recognised industry accreditation schemes. Approved Document B of the Building
Regulations of England and Wales recognizes the benefits in confidence and
reliability obtained by the use of contractors that are members of such schemes.
If a manufacturers system has been specified, advice should be obtained from them
with regard to approved or recommended installers. The scope of work
14

www.asfp.org.uk
should include a requirement that the fire stopping and/or penetration sealing
system contractor carry out inspection of work in progress and when completed. This
may include a requirement that the contractor employs an approved third party
independent inspector, whose reports will be issued to the Main Contractor. After
inspection has been completed by a suitably qualified individual, and the installation
approved, a label bearing the date type of installation and manufacturer and/or
contractor details should be fitted to the finished fire stopping and/or penetration
sealing system in order that expert advice may be obtained in the event of damage
or change to the system.
1.6Recommendations for the Building Owner
Modern commercial and public buildings are dynamic environments in which change
can be frequent and this is very likely to affect the installed fire protection systems.
In particular building services are the principal cause of breaches in fire barriers, e.g.
the running of cable when a newly networked computer system is installed. These
breaches in fire resisting elements in the event of a fire may give rise to uncontrolled
spread of fire.
Building owners (and their agents) and/or the Responsible Person designated by
the employer(s) in the building should carry out their obligations under the Fire
Safety (Workplace) Regulations. The provision and maintenance of the fire stopping
and/or penetration sealing systems within the building should form part of the risk
assessment carried out under these regulations for the building. Managers need to
be aware that there may be liability issues in the failure to comply with regulations
(e.g. as a criminal act). Where fire stopping and/or penetration sealing systems have
to be removed or have become damaged for other purposes, they must be madegood as soon as possible by competent contractors.
The Construction Design and Management Regulations (CDM) require all concerned
in the process from design inception to completion of the building to prepare a file
(the CDM file) containing details of all the work undertaken and materials used
where safety is concerned. The CDM file can be an invaluable source of information
on all aspects of fire safety work in the construction of the building that may be used
by the occupant when preparing maintenance plans, modifications to the building or
Fire Risk Assessments as required by the Fire Precautions (Workplace) Regulations.
1.7Health and safety
Many systems used to seal penetrations in floors are unable to support loads, such
as foot traffic, etc, and care must therefore be taken to establish whether or not the
installed system is load bearing. If the seal is non-load bearing, access should be
made physically impossible by installing guard rails, etc, or by installing independent
walkway systems to prevent loads being applied directly to the surface of the seal.
Manufacturers and/or specialist advice must be sought.
1.8Third Party Certification/Accreditation and Certificates of Conformity
Third Party Certification for products varies according to the terms of individual
schemes, but essentially includes verification of the test evidence and scope of
application or use of the product, and a regular audit of the factory QA system to
ensure that the product as supplied to the contractor is to the same design or
formulation as the original test samples.
15

www.asfp.org.uk
Third Party Accreditation for installers is a process whereby the contracting company
employs appropriately trained staff to design and install the required passive fire
protection system. Their work is independently audited by site inspections from the
3rd party organisation and a full record system is required as part of the scheme.
The use of such accreditation is recognised in the Building Regulations, Approved
Document B (Use of Guidance; Independent certification schemes).
Approved Document B states Use of Guidance; Materials and Workmanship
Independent certification schemes: There are many UK product certification
schemes. Such schemes certify compliance with the requirements of a recognised
document, which is appropriate to the purpose for which the material is to be used.
Materials, which are not so certified, may still conform to a relevant standard. Many
certification bodies which approve such schemes are accredited by UKAS. Since the
fire performance of a product, component or structure is dependent upon
satisfactory site installation and maintenance, independent schemes of
certification and registration of installers and maintenance firms of such
will provide confidence in the appropriate standard of workmanship being
provided.
(Page 5 of Approved Document B The Building Regulations 1991).
The use of accredited installers will reduce the incidence of systems being installed
by unskilled or unscrupulous contractors and/or the use of unsuitable systems and
reduce essential work and re-work considerably.
Upon completion, a Certificate of Conformity is issued to the main contractor for
each contract. These independent certification schemes raise the perceived profile of
the supply and installation chain and provide the client with an increased level of
comfort regarding the quality of fire stopping and/or penetration sealing systems.
16

www.asfp.org.uk
SECTION 2. TEST AND APPRAISAL PRINCIPLES

2.1
Introduction
To date there have been no standardized methods within The UK for evaluating the
contribution of firestopping and/or penetration sealing systems either via test or
assessment. They have therefore been tested by analogy with methods for other
separating elements such as the walls and floors within which they are intended to
be used. As a result existing test and assessment data is difficult to compare, there
being inevitable differences in methodology.
Given the wide range of products and product applications, it has not been possible
to prescribe a fixed programme of tests. Any programme should be designed to
cover, by test and subsequent appraisal the range of; sizes, applications and periods
of fire resistance required based on the knowledge and expertise of the assessor.
For the future, considerable guidance is given in the forthcoming CEN fire test
Standards for linear gap (prEN 1366-4) and penetration sealing systems (prEN13663) to enable the application of fire test data to be maximised and in a consistent
way. However, historically, firm principles have not been present for tests to British
Standards.
Following the ongoing development of test methods within CEN, testing is now more
harmonised throughout Europe and all such testing is likely to be conducted in
accordance with the latest available draft until the relevant Standard is finally
published.
2.1.1 European testing and this publication
Currently, fire resistance tests for the products contained within this publication are
most likely to have test evidence created by ad-hoc testing to the BS 476: Part 20
regime. The testing is deemed ad-hoc because there is no British Standard in
existence specifically dealing with penetration and linear joint seals. However, this is
all set to change.
The Construction Products Directive (CPD), a European initiative which aims to
allow free trade within the European Union, has resulted in the introduction of
European test methods, classification of products and CE marking.
The European test methods for the products contained within this document are
currently still in a draft format but can and are being tested to:
(pr)EN 1366: Part 3, fire resistance tests for service installations:
penetration seals, provides a test method for evaluating the performance
of products such as pipe closure devices, cable supporting systems (trays and
ladders) and non-combustible pipe sealing systems. Within the standard the
issues of separating wall construction, insulation performance and pipe end
conditions are covered in a level of detail above that of current testing
practise.
17

www.asfp.org.uk
(pr)EN1366: Part 4, fire resistance tests for service installations:

linear joint seals, provides a test method for evaluating the performance of
products used for sealing between two elements of construction such as two
walls or a wall and floor slab. The standard addresses the fire test method
and also considers the effect of movement on the seals. When a
manufacturer claims that the seal can tolerate a certain degree of movement
and still retain its fire resistant properties this can be proven by using the test
methodology outlined in the standard.
Both test methods are based on EN 1363: Part 1: 1999, (Fire resistance tests
Part 1: General requirements) and therefore the test methods utilise the plate
thermometer to establish and control the furnace temperature conditions.
The test methods also contain field of direct application rules, which enables a
simple extrapolation of the obtained test data. It is in effect a very basic
assessment, which allows certain variations from the original test specification. For
example; masonry wall constructions are allowed if the penetration seal has been
tested in a lightweight (flexible) partition. Similarly, horizontal linear joint seals
between walls and floors are allowed if a horizontal joint has been tested horizontally
in a wall.
Once a test has been conducted a classification document can be produced. This
classification is created in accordance with EN 13501-2 (Fire classification of
construction products and building elements - Part 2: Classification using test data
from fire resistance tests). The purpose of the classification is to provide a European
recognised class, which can then be used to determine compliance with the building
codes and regulations of the various member states of the European Union.
It is important to consider that whilst the above test methods and classification deal
with the resistance to fire requirements of the construction products directive,
generally, compliance with this essential requirement alone is not enough for CE
marking. The CPD lays out six essential requirements (ERs) that need to be
satisfied before a product can be placed into the European market place. In most
mainland European states CE marking is mandatory. But, whilst this is not the case
in the UK, you are still required to comply with the essential requirements of the
CPD. As harmonised European product standards will not be produced for
firestopping and fire sealing products, the commission has mandated EOTA
(European Organisation for Technical Approvals) to produce guidelines for satisfying
the CPD requirements.
The guidelines, known as ETAGs (European Technical Approval Guidelines) will
allow a Notified Body to produce an ETA (European Technical Approval). This
approval will consider if required, all six of the ERs. This would include taking
account of all other test information such as performance under internal and external
exposure conditions, cold state loadbearing capacity, impact resistance, durability,
moisture resistance, etc. It also includes any other performance characteristics,
which are claimed by the manufacturer and detailed in the scope of the ERs.
18

www.asfp.org.uk
The ETA is used in conjunction with on going factory production control (assuming
the initial fire testing was by a notified laboratory) to allow the Notified Body to
issue a certificate of conformity.
This process of assembling all the necessary evidence and documentation giving
entitlement to apply CE marking to a product is known as Attestation of
Conformity.
The whole process, whilst seemingly more complex than the current system, is
intended to result in a more level playing field for manufacturers throughout the
European Union.
2.1.2 Relationship with statutory provisions
Much of the guidance that supports fire safety legislation is given in terms of
performance in relation to British or European Standards for systems, methods of
test, design or in terms of European Technical Approvals. Typically therefore a
system or structure should:
a) be in accordance with a specification or design which has been proven by fire test
to be capable of meeting that performance; or
b) have been assessed from test evidence as meeting that performance.
Given that a test undertaken on a specific element of firestopping and/or penetration
sealing system is a representative evaluation of the likely end use performance and
providing the construction tested is replicated in the end use condition, there is little
interpretation needed and it can be accepted that the installed element will provide
the required fire resistance. However, where the element to be installed is altered, in
even the slightest manner, the likely effect on the fire resistance performance must
be evaluated. This is normally conducted via an assessment report provided by a
UKAS accredited test laboratory. The assessment report should address the tested
element and the required amendments to the construction and provide justification
that the proposed changes are acceptable. The conclusions and limitations within
any assessment report should be considered with care as these can often restrict the
use of the tested/assessed element rendering the construction inappropriate to the
particular end use under consideration.
ASFP recommends that assessments are conducted in accordance with the PFPF
Guide For Assessments In Lieu Of Fire Resistance Tests, those that are not may still
be acceptable for regulatory purposes although their validity should be confirmed
prior to acceptance by the appropriate approving authority. Assessments, which
follow the guidance within the PFPF Guide, will provide the end user with confidence
that the evaluation has been carried out with the necessary care and expertise and is
appropriate to the intended use.
Some areas where assessments may be offered are:
Where a modification is required to a tested construction (this is by far the
most common use of assessments)
Interpolation or extrapolation of results of a series of fire resistance tests, or
utilisation of a series of fire test results to evaluate a range of variables in a
construction design or a product
Where, for various reasons (e.g. size or configuration) it is not possible to
subject a construction or a product to a fire test.
19

www.asfp.org.uk
Assessments will vary from relativ ely simple judgements on small changes to a
product or construction through to detailed and often complex engineering
assessments of large or sophisticated elements.
2.2Appraisal Principles for Penetration Sealing Systems

As discussed above, to date there have been no standardized methods within The UK
for evaluating the contribution of firestopping and/or penetration sealing systems via
assessment resulting in a variation in scope depending upon who provides the
assessment. Basic guidelines exist in various forms but increasingly these are being
superceded by adoption of draft European guidance which is currently in an
advanced state of development (as at June 2003). The FTSG have agreed that the
draft extended application documents currently under development in respect of the
European Standards will be used as the principles for assessment of firestopping
and/or penetration sealing systems and this will provide a degree of consistency
which has not existed previously. It is anticipated that a subsequent revision of this
document will allow consideration of assessment evidence produced using only
Extended Application rules.
2.2.1 The Assessment Report

The assessment report, prepared using the guidance of this document, should
contain the following information:
1.
The name and address of the issuing body.
2.
The name and address of the sponsor.
3.
The date of issue of the extended application report.
4.
The unique reference number for the report.
5.
Summary of the report(s) that the extended application is based upon.
6.
The proposed extended field of application of the test results and the
justification for that extension.
7.
Reference to this document.
8.
Classification of the modified construction in accordance with prEN

13501-2.
9.
The following statement.
This extended application report is issued on the basis of test data, information
available and the guidance given in the Extended Application Principles For Tests
Conducted in Accordance with BS 476: Part 22; 1987 (or prEN 1366-3). If
contradictory evidence becomes availa ble, the position of the extended application
report shall be reviewed and the report sponsor notified. The extended application
report is valid initially for a period of five years from the date of issue at which time it
is recommended that it be returned for re-appraisal.
20

www.asfp.org.uk
The current principles of extended application for penetration sealing Systems (as at
June 2003) are produced in the following tables.
Separating elements Concrete or masonry
Decrease
density
Variation
in
thickness
and/or
Effect
-
Not acceptable
Comment
Separating elements Lightweight constructions

Variation
Decrease in thickness
Non standard elements
Effect
Comment
Not acceptable.
Constructions not defined in prEN 1366-3
must be tested.
Acceptable for the standard constructions
given in prEN 1366-3 if they have an
equivalent thickness and the lightweight
construction (horizontal or vertical) has an
equivalent or greater fire resistance.
Not acceptable.
Not acceptable.
=
Change of linings
Change in aperture framing

Change (density, thickness
type) of insulation material.
or
Penetrating services Changes to service items Metal pipes

Effect
Comment
Change of type of pipe material
Variation
Increase in pipe diameter

Decrease in pipe diameter
Increase in nominal pipe wall
thickness.
Decrease in nominal pipe wall
thickness.
Insulated pipes
=
=
Acceptable provided melting point is equal

to or greater than that tested and thermal
conductivity equal to or less than that
tested.
Not acceptable.
Acceptable.
Acceptable for integrity only.
Not acceptable.
Data relating to insulated pipes cannot be

used to support assessments in respect of
uninsulated pipes and vice versa.
For pre-insulated pipes a change of
insulation material is not acceptable. For
post-insulated pipes insulation material may
be changed within the same generic type,
such as rock fibre, glass wools, PVCs etc
where
the
alternative
provides
an
equivalent or greater reaction to fire
classification.
Not acceptable.
Change of insulation material.
Change in thickness and/or density

of insulation material to preinsulated pipes.
21

www.asfp.org.uk
Increase
in
thickness
and/or
density of insulation to postinsulated pipes.
Decrease in thickness of insulation
to post-insulated pipes.
Increase in length of applied
+
insulation.
Decrease in length of applied
insulation.
* May be acceptable based on proven calculation
Not acceptable.
Not acceptable.*
Acceptable.
Not acceptable.*
method.
Plastics/fibre reinforced plastics/glass pipes

Variation
Effect
Change of type of pipe material.

Increase in pipe diameter.
Decrease in pipe diameter.
Increase in nominal
thickness.
Decrease in nominal
thickness.
Comment
pipe
wall
Not acceptable.
Not acceptable.
Acceptable provided wall
maintained.
Acceptable up to 1 mm.
pipe
wall
Not acceptable.
thickness
is
Where intumescent collars or wraps are to be used with plastics pipes the range of
pipes required to be covered is often quite diverse. As different plastics have
differing properties relating to the way they soften, distort and ignite it is not always
possible to pick a worst case plastic. Even if this were the case the plastic type
picked may not be the same for different intumescent types and compounds. This is
due to the variances in pressure generation and reaction time of the material. A
factor also affecting the performance of a pipe collar is the outer casing itself.
Current market trends are moving towards lighter and thinner shells, even the use of
plastic shells, which may not withstand the pressures required to close some pipe
materials.
Because of this it is essential that a pipe collar or wrap, which is required to be used
with a variety of plastics pipes, is tested with them.
The general parameters that need to be included are as follows:
Each type of plastic (see note below).
The smallest and largest pipe diameter in each plastic type.
The thinnest and thickest pipe wall for each plastic type.
For the different plastic types it is possible to test the upper and lower limit types
and cover anything in between. For example a test on polyethylene pipes (Vicatsoftening point B 75 C) and polypropylene pipes (Vicat-softening point B 145 C)
can be used to cover polyvinyl chloride pipes (Vicat-softening point B 70-75 C),
which lies between the two, for pipe size/wall thickness within the tested ranges.
Polyvinyl chloride has also demonstrated that it chars rather than ignites more
readily (under fire resistance test conditions) than polyethylene and polypropylene,
which are more prone to ignition as they decompose. Similar principles are also
applicable to other plastic types.
22

www.asfp.org.uk
Cables Single/bundles not tested to standard configuration

Effect
Comment
Increase in size
Decrease in size
Variation
Increase in conductor CSA

Change
of
generic
conductor material.
Change
of
type
of
insulation material.
=
-
Single cables or bundles Not acceptable.

Single cables or bundles Acceptable subject
to meeting
10 % of the tested conductor to
cable cross sectional area (CSA) ratio.
Acceptable Up to 10 %.
Not acceptable.
Not acceptable.
Cable Trunking
Variation
Decrease in size
Inclusion of trunking
Effect
Comment
Acceptable subject to not exceeding the ratio of

overall CSA of cable(s) to the internal CSA of
the trunking.
If cable trunking has not been included in tests,
results from cable trays of same generic
material and thickness can be used. The
perimeter of the trunking shall not exceed the
maximum cable tray width and an internal seal
must be provided within the trunking coincident
with the position of external seal. CSA of
cable(s) may be up to 60% of the internal CSA
of the trunking.
Conduits
As pipes (steel or plastic as appropriate).
Busbars
No changes acceptable .
Support conditions
Distance of support from the face of the seal must not exceed that tested.
23

www.asfp.org.uk
2.3
Extended application principles for generic seal types
Bag/pillow seals
Seal depth
Variation
Effect
Increase in seal depth

Decrease in seal depth
= or +
-
Comment
Acceptable.
Not acceptable.
Aperture
Effect
Comment
Increase in size
Variation
Decrease in size
Change of shape
Increase in area up to 50 % acceptable. In

the case of floors suitable support must be
demonstrated.
Acceptable where there is sufficient room
for installation of the seal.
Acceptable
Size of bag/pillow
Variation
Change in size
Effect
=
Comment
Acceptable.
Seal material
Variation
Effect
Change of infill material

Change
of
bag/pillow
outer material
Comment
Not acceptable.
Not acceptable.
Configuration
Variation
Effect
-
Not acceptable.
Change of position within

thickness of separating
element
Distance of seal from exposed face in

wall/floor cannot be reduced from that
tested.
concrete/masonry
wall/floor
can
be
increased from that tested.
Change of packing density

(volume fill)
= or +
Comment
Orientation
Variation
Effect
Change of orientation
Comment
Test evidence from wall applications
cannot
be
used
to
support
floor
applications and vice-versa.
Board seals
Seal depth
Variation
24
Effect
= or +
-
Comment
Acceptable.
Not acceptable.

www.asfp.org.uk
Aperture
Effect
Comment
Increase in size
Variation
Decrease in size
Increase in area up to 50 % acceptable

within a standard lightweight supporting
construction (when tested at 3 m by 3 m).
When tested within a standard concrete or
masonry supporting construction the
increase in area up to 50 % is applicable
only to concrete or masonry constructions.
Smaller acceptable where there is sufficient
room for installation of the seal.
Board and coating

Variation
Effect
Change of board material

Increase
in
board
thickness
Decrease
in
board
thickness
Increase in board density
Decrease in board density
Change
of
coating
material
Change
in
coating
thickness
Change of perimeter/joint
adhesive(s)
Comment
Not acceptable.
Acceptable (Supporting evidence for
framing systems/fixings must be provided).
Not acceptable.
+
-
Acceptable.
Not acceptable.
Not acceptable.
Not acceptable.
Not acceptable
Configuration
Variation
element.
Effect
Comment

tested.
concrete/masonry
wall/floor
can
be
Acceptable.
= or +
Increase of air gap (if

used)
Decrease of air gap (if
used)
Change
of
internal
support frames
Variation in seal shape
= or +
-
Not acceptable.
Not acceptable*
Acceptable only without additional board to

board joints.
* May be acceptable based on proven calculation method.
Orientation
Variation
25
Effect
Comment

www.asfp.org.uk
Floor seal generally more onerous than

wall and may be used as supporting
evidence for a wall mounted application.
cannot be used to support floor
applications.
Foam seals
Seal depth
Variation
Effect

Comment
= or +
-
Acceptable.
Not acceptable.
Aperture
Effect
Comment
Increase in size
Variation
Decrease in size

masonry
supporting
construction
the
Smaller normally acceptable but consider
overall size when services are fitted sufficient room for installation. Seal/service
area ratio should be maintained.
Seal material
Variation
Effect
Change of seal material
Not acceptable.
Comment
Configuration
Variation
Effect
Comment

element

tested.
concrete/masonry wall/floor can be
Not acceptable.
= or +
Change of formwork
Orientation
Variation
Effect
Comment
Floor seal generally more onerous than wall
and may be used as supporting evidence for a
wall mounted application. Test evidence from
wall applications cannot be used to support
floor applications.
Mastic seals
Seal depth
Variation
26
Effect
= or +
-
Comment
Acceptable.
Not acceptable.

www.asfp.org.uk
Increase in backing material depth

Decrease in backing material depth
+
-
Acceptable for Class A1 and A2 materials.

Not acceptable.
Aperture
Effect
Comment
Increase in size
Variation
Decrease in size

overall size when services are fitted sufficient room for installation.
Seal/service area ratio should be
maintained.
Seal material
Variation
Effect
Change of mastic composition

Change of backing material
Comment
Not acceptable.
Not acceptable unless equivalent or
greater reaction to fire and insulation
performance.
Configuration
Variation
Effect
Comment
Change of position within thickness of

separating element

tested.
concrete/masonry
wall/floor
can
be
= or +
Orientation
Variation
Effect
Comment
applications.
Mortar seals
Seal depth
Variation
Effect
=
-
Comment
Acceptable.
Not acceptable
Aperture
Variation
Increase in size
27
Effect
=
Comment


www.asfp.org.uk
Decrease in size
Seal material
Variation

Smaller acceptable where there is
sufficient room for installation of the seal.
Effect
Change of material
Comment
Not acceptable.
Configuration
Variation
Effect
Comment

separating element

tested.
concrete/masonry
wall/floor
can
be
= or +
Orientation
Variation
Effect
Comment
applications.
Pipe closures Plastic pipes: wraps/collars

Seal depth
Variation
Effect

= or +
-
Comment
Acceptable.
Not acceptable
Seal thickness (The smallest dimension between the inner and outer surfaces of the seal)
Variation
Effect
Variation
Effect
Increase/decrease in seal thickness
Not acceptable
Comment
Aperture
Change of aperture size.
Change of aperture shape e.g. round
to square.
Not acceptable.
Not acceptable.
Comment
Seal material
Variation
Change of material(s)
Effect
-
Comment
Not acceptable.
Configuration
Variation
28
Effect
Comment

www.asfp.org.uk

separating element
Plug/block seals
Seal depth
Variation
Test results from surface mounted pipe

collars cannot be used to cover fully
recessed/cast-in applications. May be used
to cover partly recessed (up to 50 % of its
depth into the wall/floor).
Distance of cast in collars or wraps from
the exposed face cannot be increased.
Effect

=
-
Comment
Acceptable.
Not acceptable
Aperture
Variation
Effect
Increase in size
Decrease in size
Comment
Smaller acceptable where there is
sufficient room for installation of the seal.
Size of plug/block
Variation
Effect
Change in size
Seal material
Variation
Comment
Acceptable.
Effect
Change of material
Comment
Not acceptable.
Configuration
Variation
Effect
Comment
Change of position within thickness

of separating element

tested.
concrete/masonry
wall/floor
can
be
= or +
Orientation
Variation
Effect
Comment
applications.
Putty seals
29

www.asfp.org.uk
Seal depth
Variation
Effect

=
-
Acceptable.
Not acceptable
Comment
Aperture
Variation
Effect
Increase in size
Decrease in size
Comment
overall size when services are fitted sufficient room for installation.
Seal/service area ratio should be
maintained.
Seal material
Variation
Effect
Change of material
Not acceptable.
Comment
Configuration
Variation
Effect
Comment
Change of position within thickness

of separating element

tested.
concrete/masonry
wall/floor
can
be
Not acceptable.
Acceptable.
= or +
Decrease of air gap (if used)

Increase of air gap (if used)
Orientation
Variation
30
Effect
Comment
applications.

www.asfp.org.uk
SECTION 3. HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE

3.1
Types of penetrations and joints
5
6
7
9
8
1
12
(Note: The above illustration does not depict fire (including cavity) barriers, for
information on the systems that are appropriate for this type of application go
directly to section 3.2)
31

www.asfp.org.uk
3.2
Typical applicable products by type of penetration, joint and barrier
from 3.1
(All fire stopping/sealing solutions are permanent unless stated.
Other fire stopping/sealing solutions may also apply to these scenarios)
1.
Horizontal cable tray penetration
2.
Horizontal pipe penetration
3.
Sealing of blank opening
4.
Horizontal multiple penetration
5.
Temporary multiple horizontal penetration
6.
Cable penetration
7.
Vertical duct penetration
8.
Vertical pipe penetration
9.
Multiple penetration (vertical and horizontal)
10.
Vertical and horizontal cable penetration
32
Mortars
Plugs/blocks
Pipe closures (plastic pipes only)

Sealants (metal pipes only)
Mortars
Plugs/blocks
Coated batts
Mortars
Plugs/blocks
Coated batts
Bags/pillows. (Note: If adequately supported some bags/pillows can also be

used for vertical penetrations )
Mortar
Coated batts
Foam
Sealants
Mortar
Mineral fibre and sealant/mastic

Mortar
Coated batts
Plugs/blocks
Mortar
Coated batts

www.asfp.org.uk
11.
Movement joints
12.
Horizontal duct penetration
13.
33
Sealants
Preformed elastomeric seals
Mortar
Fire (including cavity) barrier (Not shown in 3.1 diagram)

Coated batts
Mineral wool curtains
Woven textiles
Boards

www.asfp.org.uk
Product Flowchart
Based upon the

product finder, what
type of firestopping
is required?
(Examples are shown in the
following figures)
Penetration
Joint
Fire
(including
cavity)
Barrier
Seal type
Seal type
Seal type
Mineral fibre
slabs and strips
(Section 4.1)
Mineral fibre
slabs and strips
(Section 4.1)
Coated mineral
fibre batts
(Section 4.2)
Foam
(Section 4.3)
Foam
(Section 4.3)
Mineral Fibre
slabs and
strips
(Section 4.1)
Coated Batts
(Section 4.2)
Bags/Pillows
(Section 4.4)
Woven textiles
(Section 4.7)
Bags/Pillows
(Section 4.4)
Sealant/Mastic
(Section 4.8)
Plugs/blocks
(Section 4.5)
Curtain Walling
seals
(section 4.10)
Preformed
elastomeric
seals (section
4.11)
Pipe closures
(Section 4.6)
Mortars
(Section 4.9)
34

www.asfp.org.uk
The diagrams in the following figures (Figures 2 to 4) show the types of seals which
may be used
Examples of Joint Seals
Preformed elastomeric intumescent
seal used to seal expansion joints in a
blockwork wall and between a
blockwork wall and a concrete soffit
Preformed elastomeric intumescent

seal used to seal movement joints in a
blockwork wall and a concrete soffit
Linear and trapezoidal seals
35

www.asfp.org.uk
Examples of Penetration Seals

Pipe closures used around plastic pipes in a
blockwork wall
Mortar poured onto permanent floor

shutter
Coated batt used for a horizontal protection
Pillows used to provide temporary

multiple penetration for a horizontal
cable tray penetration
Pipe wrap used around plastic pipes in a

blockwork wall
Multi-cable firestop using mortar and

preformed elastomeric seals
36

www.asfp.org.uk
Examples of Fire (including Cavity) Barrier Systems
Mineral fibre fire barrier system in a roof space
37

www.asfp.org.uk
SECTION 4. GENERIC PRODUCT INFORMATION

The information contained in this document is primarily for fire evidence and
the manufacturer of the product in question should be consulted for
information on other parameters such as acoustic and thermal insulation.
4.1
Mineral Fibre Slabs and Strips
Description
Mineral fibre products for fire stopping are supplied in a number of forms; typically
referred to as mats, batts, or pre-formed shapes. These products are usually
manufactured from the range of higher melting point mineral wools. The usual
density range is 75-250kg/m.
Areas of Use
Mineral fibre products can be used to fireseal penetrations through compartment
walls and floors and allow additional services to be readily installed as required. In
certain circumstances a supporting structure will be required - refer to
manufacturers' recommendations. Blank seals can also be installed, so that when
services are required to penetrate a wall or floor, they can be quickly installed and
the seal reinstated. Mineral fibre products can also be used at the junction between
the head of a wall and a floor or roof soffit.
Performance
Mineral fibre products are tested using the furnace conditions and relevant
performance criteria defined in BS 476 Part 20: 1987 for various supporting
constructions. Individual system designers and manufacturers should be consulted
for the design requirements of the proposed penetration system.
Installation
Mineral fibre products can be installed as pre-formed shapes or as standard batts for
tailoring to fit openings. Batts can be friction fitted to the sides of the opening and
around the penetrating services. A "fire resistant" sealant is generally applied to all
joints and to the raw edges of the batt. Some systems may require secondary
support. Again this will vary from Manufacturer to Manufacturer. Systems should be
installed by a specialist contractor.
Maintenance, Inspection and Repair
Mineral fibre products generally require minimum of maintenance during the lifetime
of the building, but annual inspections are desirable to recognise any mechanical
damage and the necessary repairs made. The seals must be properly reinstated
when services are re-routed.
4.2
Coated Mineral Fibre Batts
Description
Coated Mineral fibre batts for fire stopping are supplied in a number of forms;
typically referred to as mats, slabs, batts or pre-formed shapes. These products are
usually manufactured from the range of higher melting point mineral wools. The
usual density range is 75-250kg/m.
38

www.asfp.org.uk
Areas of Use
Coated mineral fibre batts can be used to fireseal penetrations through compartment
walls and floors and allow additional services to be readily installed as required. In
certain circumstances a supporting structure will be required - refer to
manufacturers' recommendations. Blank seals can also be installed, so that when
services are required to penetrate a wall or floor, they can be quickly installed and
the seal reinstated.
Performance
Coated mineral fibre batts are tested using the furnace conditions and relevant
performance criteria defined in BS 476 Part 20: 1987 for various supporting
constructions. Individual system designers and manufacturers should be consulted
for the design requirements of the proposed penetration system.
Installation
Coated mineral fibre batts can be installed as pre-formed shapes or as standard batts
for tailoring to fit openings. Batts can be friction fitted to the sides of the opening
and around the penetrating services. A "fire resistant" sealant is generally applied to
all joints and to the raw edges of the slab. Some systems may require secondary
support. Again this will vary from Manufacturer to Manufacturer. Systems should be
Coated mineral fibre batts generally require minimum of maintenance during the
lifetime of the building, but annual inspections are desirable to recognise any
mechanical damage and the necessary repairs made. The seals must be properly
reinstated when services are re-routed.
4.3
Foam
Description
Normally a two component silicone material which, when mixed together, cause the
material to foam and increase its volume. The material vulcanises at normal room
temperatures resulting in the formation of a highly resilient seal.
Systems can be expected to prevent the passage of cold smoke, halon gas and have
good resistance to water, including flooding.
In floors, seals would not be considered load bearing.
Area of Use
Suitable for seals, particularly where access is difficult and where services are
complex (see Installation).
The seals will accommodate small amounts of axial and lateral movement of the
penetrating services and will achieve a degree of nuclear radiation attenuation. Refer
to manufacturers product specifications for actual radiation performance.
Performance
Room temperature vulcanising foams are tested using the furnace conditions and
relevant performance criteria defined in BS 476: Part 20: 1987 for various supporting
constructions. Protections periods may vary from one system to another in different
39

www.asfp.org.uk
configurations, and orientations.

Physical performance characteristics will be similar to those for sealants/mastics.
In floors, seals would not be considered load bearing.
Installation
Metered mixing is essential and reaction times will vary.
Manufacturers instructions must be referred to, ensuring the correct installation of
the seal. Temporary or permanent damming boards are used to contain the
expanding mixture. Where permanent damming boards are used their presence must
not adversely affect the fire performance of the finished seal.
Specialist advice should be sought in the choice of damming board materials, which
form an integral part of the design of the finished fire seal.
Room Temperature Vulcanising Foams (R.T.V.s) generally have a long service life.
An annual visual inspection is strongly recommended to check that the seal has not
deteriorated or experienced mechanical damage.
It is good practice to inspect more frequently to ensure that, where a seal may have
been modified for the addition of new and/or the removal of existing penetrating
services, the seal ahs been reinstated.
In most cases the seals may be reinstated or repaired using more of the same
material, strictly in accordance with the manufacturers instructions.
Specialist advice should be sought when reinstating this type of seal.
4.4
Bags/Pillows
Description
Bags/pillows are available in various sizes and shapes and are specified for use in
temporary or permanent fire stopping situations where services such as cables pass
through walls and floors. Since they are easily removed, they are particularly suited
to areas where services are frequently re-routed. They can also provide temporary
protection during construction work. Bags/pillows are made from special fabrics and
enclose a filling material which often incorporates an intumescent material.
Areas of Use
Bags/pillows can be used wherever services, such as cables, penetrate a fire
resistant element. They are particularly useful where services are frequently rerouted, and can be used as temporary protection during the construction phase of a
building.
Performance
Bags/pillows are tested using the furnace conditions and relevant performance
criteria defined in BS476: Part 20: 1987. Protection periods may vary from one
system to another and in different configurations, orientations and packing densities
40

www.asfp.org.uk
(number of bags/pillows per square metre). To fully contain cold smoke, additional
precautions will be required.
Installation
Bags/pillows must be placed into the opening(s) using the correct orientation,
packing density and overlap (staggered joints), to achieve the desired fire rating. For
wall penetrations, bags/pillows are normally self supporting, but large openings with
few penetrating services may require a steel retaining mesh for support on both
sides of the penetration. The Size of mesh and method of fixing may affect the
support of the bags/pillows and the manufacturers fixing specification must be
adopted. Floor penetrations normally require a well anchored steel retaining mesh or
basket to support the bags/pillows.
Since bags/pillows are easily removed it is advisable to regularly check that the seal
is intact and that all bags/pillows are still in place. The seal must be properly reinstated when cables are re-routed or disturbed.
4.5 Plugs/blocks
Description
Plugs/blocks for fire stopping are available in a variety of shapes and sizes. They are
generally cuboid for rectangular penetrations or cylindrical/conical for circular
penetrations. Castellated plugs/blocks are available for trapezoidal metal decking.
Plugs/blocks are formed from materials such as bonded vermiculite, mineral wool,
gypsum/cementitious materials, polyurethane, modified rubber, etc. They can be
either rigid or flexible. Some fire stopping plugs/blocks are inherently fire resistant,
some rely on an intumescent coating, and some are manufactured using intumescent
materials.
Areas of Use
Plugs/blocks can be used for a wide variety of fire stopping requirements. They can
be used individually in small penetrations or in multiple layers for larger openings.
They are useful where services require occasional re-routing.
Performance
Fire stopping plugs/blocks are tested using the furnace conditions and the relevant
performance criteria defined in BS 476: Part 20: 1987.
Installation
Fire stopping plugs/blocks can be used individually where the penetration is small, or
in multiple layers for larger openings. The various types can be loose laid,
compression/friction fitted, or bonded together. Some types will require a fire
resistant sealant to be applied along joints and interfaces. For circular penetrations,
cylindrical or conical plugs/blocks can be used.
Some plugs/blocks, such as those based on calcium, potassium or sodium silicate,
(e.g. bonded vermiculite plugs/blocks) may require additional protection in high
humidity environments.
Since there are many different types of fire stopping brick, installation should be in
accordance with the manufacturers' instructions. Specialist advice should be sought
where these materials are to be used in combination with other fire stopping
materials.
41

www.asfp.org.uk

Since plugs/blocks are often easy to remove, it is advisable to regularly check that
the seal is intact and that all plugs/blocks are still in place. The seal must be
properly re-instated when services are re-routed or disturbed. A minimum annual
inspection is recommended.
4.6 Pipe closures
Description
Pipe closures are designed to preserve the integrity of a fire rated compartment
where plastic pipes or trunking pass through floors or walls. Unlike metal or cable
service penetrations, plastic pipes and trunking soften and collapse under heating,
therefore some means of preventing the passage of hot gasses and smoke is
required. This is achieved by strangling the cross-section of the pipe or trunking.
There are variations in design of pipe closures. The two main types are pipe collars
and pipe wraps. Both systems confine an intumescent compound which expands on
exposure to fire, rapidly exerting pressure upon the pipe. The plastic walls, which
will have softened due to the heat, collapse under this pressure creating a
constriction. Some pipe closures incorporate a mechanical device which may or may
not include an intumescent compound. Pipe collars incorporate an outer casing
which acts as a restraint for the intumescent material, enabling the collar to be either
surface fixed to the separating element or incorporated within it. Pipe wraps have
no casing and hence must be located within the separating element, which acts as a
restraint for the intumescent.
Areas of Use
Pipe collars or pipe wraps can be used where plastic pipes or plastic trunking pass
through fire resistant elements such as floors or walls.
Performance
Pipe closures are tested using the furnace conditions and relevant performance
criteria defined in BS 476: Part 20: 1987 for various supporting constructions.
Protection periods may vary from one system to another and in different
configurations and orientations. The performance of a pipe closure will depend on
the type of plastic used for the manufacture of the pipe, its diameter, and its wall
thickness.
Installation
Pipe Collars
The normal method is to fit the collar to the wall or floor on the fire risk side,
although some designs can be recessed into the structure or fitted on the non-risk
side. If there is a fire risk on both sides of a compartment wall or floor, each side
may require protection.
It is essential that the method of securing the collar to the fire resistant element will
not be compromised by the action of fire. Certain types of fixing components may
not be suitable. Manufacturers fixing specifications must be adopted.
Pipe wraps
Pipe wraps are fitted into an oversize hole in the separating element, surrounding
the pipe. If there is a fire risk on both sides of a compartment wall or floor two
wraps may be required.
42

www.asfp.org.uk
For exact details of fitting for any type of pipe closure, specialist advice should be
sought.
Some systems may deteriorate under adverse environmental conditions, (e.g.,
extremes of temperature or condensation) and may require replacement if exposed.
Expert advice should be sought where pipe closures are likely to be used in any of
these conditions.
4.7 Woven Textiles

Description
Woven textiles composed of high temperature glass or ceramic filaments (in some
cases these are coated with other materials to enhance their fire performance
properties) are available in various lengths, widths and thicknesses.
Areas of Use
Woven textiles products are used to provide non-rigid fire (including cavity) barriers
to provide both vertical and horizontal compartmentation of structures, typically
within roof voids and above suspended ceilings.
Performance
Woven textile products are generally tested to BS 476: Parts 6/7/20/22: 1987.
Protection periods and performance will differ dependent upon configuration and
method of assembly. Testing.
Installation
Woven textile products are easily cut on site using conventional tools. Fixing in place
is normally by screwing to a framework. Specialist advice should be sought,
particularly about methods of fixing, and installation should be carried out by a
specialist contractor, strictly in accordance with the Manufacturers instructions.
Particular attention should be given to any joints and edges.
Woven textile products have a long life but annual inspection is to be encouraged to
ensure the retention of the fixing system. Damaged sections must be replaced and in
so doing, be in accordance with manufacturer's instructions.
4.8 Sealant/Mastic
Description
Single or multipack systems comprising organic, inorganic or intumescent fillers predispersed in a suitable binder (ie acrylic, polysulphide, silicone etc). The materials are
of high viscosity and are dispensed by gun or trowelled into the opening and
between penetrating services. The materials cure by way of evaporation or chemical
reaction to give either a flexible or rigid seal, dependent upon the binder system.
Systems can be expected to have resistance to cold smoke, halon gas and water,
including flooding.
Areas of Use
They are suitable for penetration seals in all forms of fire resistant construction,
particularly where openings are small, penetrations are complex and access is
43

www.asfp.org.uk
difficult.
Performance
Sealants/Mastics are tested using the furnace conditions and relevant performance
criteria defined in BS 476: Part 20: 1987 for various supporting constructions.
Protection periods may vary from one system to another in different configurations
and orientations.
This type of penetration seal would normally be used for small openings with the
sealant in some cases being applied onto a combustible material such as
polyethylene or onto a non-combustible backing material such as mineral wool. In
the latter case this may form a part of the fire design of the seal.
Installation
Normally installed without the need for specialist equipment and often without the
need for site mixing. Use of mastic guns or trowels is common, although for floor
penetrations some materials can be poured using temporary or permanent damming
boards.
Dusty/friable surfaces may need additional treatment prior to the application of the
sealant/mastic - refer to manufacturers instructions.
Sealants and Mastics generally have a long service life, however some materials may
deteriorate over prolonged periods, particularly when subjected to the elements.
deteriorated.
It is good practice to inspect more frequently to ensure that the seal has been
adequately maintained.
These types of seals may last for the life of the building, however where the seal
may have deteriorated or suffered mechanical damage, it should be completely
removed and replaced in accordance with the manufacturers instructions.
4.9 Mortars
Description
Generally a gypsum or cementitious based powder blended with inorganic
lightweight fillers, composite reinforcement and chemical modifiers. The compounds
are designed to be mixed with water and placed around and between penetrating
services giving a rigid seal with typical densities ranging between 800kg/m3 and
2000kg/m3. With some systems the fillers give positive expansion whilst curing, to
overcome the possibility of shrinkage cracks.
Areas of Use
The systems are mainly used for sealing penetrations through concrete and masonry
constructions although some can be used in conjunction with lightweight partitions
or timber floors.
Whilst the systems are particularly useful for sealing small or complex penetrations
some systems are capable of being used to seal large openings.
44

www.asfp.org.uk
Performance
Mortars are tested using the furnace conditions and relevant performance criteria
defined in BS 476: Part 20 1987 for various supporting constructions. Protection
periods may vary from one system to another in different configurations and
orientations.
In wall penetrations some systems will be capable of supporting the penetrating
services in the fire without the need for additional mechanical support.
In floor penetrations some systems will be capable of supporting light loads such as
maintenance foot traffic, although it is likely that some form of additional
reinforcement will be necessary (ie weld mesh, rebar etc).
Systems can be expected to have resistance to cold smoke, halon gas and
mechanical damage and may have good resistance to water, including flooding.
Installation
The mortar is mixed and applied using simple tools, generally without the need for
specialist equipment. For large installations some materials are capable of being
pumped after mix ing.
In floor penetrations a temporary or permanent damming board is normally used
with the mortar poured in place. Small penetrations can sometimes be made by
trowelling the mortar into the opening without the use of a damming board.
For wall penetrations mortars are often trowelled using a single damming board or
no damming board, dependent on the opening size.
Mortar seals generally have a long service life; however, an annual visual inspection
is strongly recommended to ensure that the seal has not deteriorated in situ. It is
good practice to inspect more frequently to ensure that, where a seal may have been
modified for the addition of new and/or the removal of existing penetration services,
the seal has been reinstated.
In most cases, the mortar seals may be reinstated or repaired using more of the
same material, strictly in accordance with the appropriate installation method.
Specialist advice should be sought especially when reinstating load bearing floor
seals.
4.10 Curtain Wall Seals

Description
Normally mineral wool based, these products are often used in conjunction with
metal support systems and/or mastics/self levelling compounds to seal the gap
between a floor slab and a curtain walling system. Throughout their lifetime these
sealing systems will have to withstand large amounts of movement due to wind
induced flexing of the curtain walling panels.
45

www.asfp.org.uk
Areas of Use
Generally used between floor slabs and curtain walling systems.
Performance
Curtain wall sealing systems are tested using the furnace conditions and relevant
performance criteria defined in BS 476: Part 20: 1987 for various supporting
constructions. Protection periods may vary from one system to another in different
configurations and orientations.
Installation
Curtain walling sealing systems can be installed as pre-formed shapes or as standard
sized products that are cut to shape onsite. The effectiveness of the fire stop will
depend on the ability of the curtain walling/cladding system to maintain the
compression fit for the duration of the required fire resistance period. Many systems
require secondary support and/or the use of mastics/self levelling compounds. These
requirements will vary from Manufacturer to Manufacturer. Systems should be
Annual inspections are desirable to recognise any mechanical damage and the
necessary repairs made.
4.11 Preformed Elastomeric Seals
Description
Generally made from elastomeric foam, sometimes with reinforcing sheets on either
side. The foam and/or the reinforcing sheets may be intumescent. These products
are generally supplied in a strip form.
Areas of Use
Generally used to seal movement joints between two building elements, eg. between
a floor and a wall.
Performance
Preformed elastomeric seals are tested using the furnace conditions and relevant
performance criteria defined in BS 476: Part 20: 1987 for various supporting
constructions. Protection periods may vary from one system to another in different
configurations and orientations.
Installation
These products are fitted by compressing by hand and then by pushing into the gap
that requires sealing.
Preformed elastomeric seals generally have a long service life, however some
materials may deteriorate over prolonged periods, particularly when subjected to the
elements.
deteriorated.
46

www.asfp.org.uk

Fire Stopping

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Fire Stopping

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Fire Stopping

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Fire Stopping and Penetration Seals

for the Construction Industry

Association for Specialist Fire Protection

Association for Specialist Fire Protection

The publishers wish to express their appreciation of the work undertaken by

2004 Association for Specialist Fire Protection

Association for Specialist Fire Protection

FIRE STOPPING AND PENETRATION SEALS

Association for Specialist Fire Protection

Association for Specialist Fire Protection

Association for Specialist Fire Protection

appraisal of the likely performance of a component or element of construction used

Blank Penetration Seal: An aperture through a separating element that has

Cavity Barrier: A construction provided to close a concealed space against

penetration of smoke or flame, or provided to restrict the movement of smoke or

Compartment (fire): A building or part of a building, comprising one or more

rooms, spaces or storeys, constructed to prevent the spread of fire to or from

Construction Joints: Gaps left by design during the construction of a building

Engineering appraisal/judgement: An independent, technical appraisal of

the likely performance of a construction component used in an end use application if

Fire-resisting (fire resistance): The ability of a component or construction of

Fire-resisting partition: An internal non-load bearing vertical dividing structure

Fire-resisting suspended ceiling: A suspended ceiling designed to contribute

Fire Safety Engineering: The application of scientific and engineering principles,

rules [Codes], and expert judgement, based on an understanding of the phenomena

Fire separating element: A compartment wall, compartment floor, cavity barrier

Association for Specialist Fire Protection

Fire-stopping: Sealing products that take up imperfections of fit or design

tolerance between the fire-resisting fixed elements of a building to restrict the

Insulation: The resistance to the transfer of excessive heat, i.e. an ability to

Integrity: The resistance to fire penetration, i.e. an ability to maintain the

relevant, to accommodate a specified degree of movement and of less than or equal

Penetration Sealing System: The assembly consisting of the penetrating item,

Reaction to fire: The performance of a material or system in a fire situation with

Service Supporting Construction: Mechanical support provided in the form of

Association for Specialist Fire Protection

Smoke barriers: An internal non-load bearing dividing structure designed to resist

Structural fire protection: Products used to insulate the structural frame of a

Association for Specialist Fire Protection

SECTION 1. FIRE PROTECTION REGULATIONS

Association for Specialist Fire Protection

Section 11.2 of Approved Document B3 goes on to say: If a fire separating element

kept as few in number as possible and

(Page 80 of Approved Document B3 The Building Regulations 1991 2000 Edition).

By conforming with provisions which are stated in the Technical Standards to

Section 3 of the introduction to Technical Standard D states:-

Association for Specialist Fire Protection

Association for Specialist Fire Protection

Technical Standard D Amended September 2001)

1.2.3 Northern Ireland

Association for Specialist Fire Protection

independent panel consists of representatives from Warrington Fire Research Centre,

establish the effects of such penetration on the integrity and insulation

1.4Recommendations for the specifier for fire stopping and penetration

Association for Specialist Fire Protection

A number of parties may have reasonable claim to influence the specification

The correct location of the fire stopping and penetration seals

1.5Recommendations for the Main Contractor/Installation Contractor

Association for Specialist Fire Protection