MoF - Exp 8
MoF - Exp 8
MoF - Exp 8
College of Engineering
Department of Civil Engineering
CEWB121 Fluids Mechanics Laboratory
Laboratory Experiment (8)
(HB 014 METACENTRIC HEIGHT)
Name: Jubair Ahmad Musazay
ID: CE081471
Section: 01
Group Number: 2
Group Members:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Performance
Cover Page
Table of content
Objective
Theory
Anticipated results
Apparatus
Procedure
Analysis/Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Critique
References
Appendix
Totals
5
1
4
5
10
10
5
5
20
15
10
5
2
3
Jubair Ahmad Musazay
Table of content
No.
Title/ Subject
Page
1. Cover Page . 1
2. Table of content . 2
3. Objective 3
4. Theory 3
5. Anticipated Results .. 4
6. Apparatus . 4
7. Procedures 4
8. Results ... 5
9. Discussion . 8
10. Conclusion 10
11. Critique 11
12. References ... 11
13. Appendix .. 12
Objective:
The objective of this experiment is to study the stability of a pontoon when its center of
gravity changes vertically or horizontally.
Theory:
When a pontoon is floated in the water, the weight of the pontoon acts vertically through
its center of gravity G. At the same time, the displaced water provides a buoyancy force
vertically through the center of gravity of the displaced water B. In a stable condition,
pontoon weight and buoyancy force are equal and opposite.
GM d
d X1
W
d X1
W
Or GM
dX 1
W d
= X 2 ddS
2
= d x d S
= dI
I = second moment of area about axis XX = xdS
If V is the volume of the displaced fluid by pontoon
Buoyancy force
= V
= V x BB1
Thus VBB1
= dI
However, BB1
B BMd
= BMd
= dI
BM
I
V
For pontoon, I
1
3
LD
12
= Pontoon length
= Pontoon width
Anticipated Results:
Based on what we know until now, one of the things that we can expect in this
experiment is that we will not get any horizontal component for bouncy. Because the
bouncy, which is also known as Buoyant Force is the reaction to balance the vertical
force (weight of the object) and therefore it has only vertical components.
Again based the theories that we know, we can expect that the pontoon or any other
floating object with a higher Metacentric Height compare to its center of gravity, will
have a higher stability.
Apparatus:
This equipment is for a study of a pontoon stability when is center of gravity changes
vertically or horizontally.
The equipment consist of
1. A pontoon 200mm wide, 400mm long and 100mm high. The total
2.
3.
4.
5.
Procedure:
1. The weight of pontoon and jockey weight adjustable were weighted and the
dimensions of pontoon were measured.
2. The center of gravity of the pontoon was located by putting a knife edge on the mast.
= 200mm
Length
= 400mm
Jockey weight ()
= 200g
Adjustable weight
= 500g
= 276g
Results:
Position of Jockey (cm)
Weight
Angle o
height on the
mast Y1 (mm)
dx/d
150
Metacentric
CG = 7.5 cm
Weight
Height (mm)
Angle o
height on the
dx/d
mast Y1 (mm)
200
CG = 8 cm
Weight
2
9.5
12.
1
87.
5
12
9.5
5
332
185
119
92.3
9.5
12.
7
16.
4
28.
3
38.
6
19.
12
12.7
9.55
4.5
25.
9
12.
Angle o
dx/d
CG = 9 cm
Weight
Angle o
height on the
dx/d
Height (mm)
mast Y1 (mm)
300
CG = 10 cm
Metacentric
Height (mm)
0
0
Height (mm)
Metacentric
12.7
166
mast Y1 (mm)
250
119
Metacentric
height on the
18
8
14.
5.5
20.
0
0
0
10.
5
10.
9
0
0
0
12.
7
Sample of calculations:
From the Manual:
X=8
= 1.6
10
0.0
12
1.6
cm
degree
At 100m height:
dx cm
=
d rad
d=1.6 deg
2 rad
0.0279 rad
360 deg
dx
2
=
=71.6 cm/rad
d 0.0279
Radian is actually dimensionless
Our Calculations:
dx = (10 8) cm = 2cm
d = 2.75o
d = (2.75*2*)/360 = 0.048rad
dx 2cm
=
=0.73
d 2.75
dx
2c m
=
=41 .7 c m/rad
d 0.048 rad
Discussions:
1. The created waves by the pontoon might have constrained the
cord to keep swinging. Because, anytime when we put the
pontoon in the water, there were some waves created around the
pontoon which made the pontoon undulate.
2. Actually, it was difficult to get an exact value for the angle since
the reading cord was oscillating continuously.
3. Human error can always be one of the reasons for difference in
any experiment which in this case improper reading of the angle
would cause some differences.
4. One of the other reasons for the error can be the equipment
failure.
5. Not being consistent with the lab manual procedures and not
following the procedures accordingly and step by step, may lead
to committing errors as well.
problems.
Using a laboratory manual which is rich of information will also
it.
And etc
Conclusion:
By performing this experiment we learnt and we proved that any floating object will have
a higher stability in water if its Metacentric Height is higher that its center of gravity.
One of the other things that we can conclude from this experiment here is, we can see that
buoyancy has no horizontal component.
Critique:
manual.
Sample of calculation of this experiment is insufficient.
Theory part of this experiment is confusing.
The water tank (water tap) was relatively small regarding with
the size of the pontoon. The pontoon used to hit the walls of the
tank since the floating area was insufficient.
Reference:
[1].
[2].
10
Appendix:
Symbol
a
d
fs
g
h
m
p
pht
Name
Area
Diameter
Distortive stress
Acceleration due to gravity
Height
Mass
Pressure
Pressure at base of liquid column
t
v
Thickness
Velocity
V
X
Y
F
L
Volume
Co-ordinate
Co-ordinate
Force
Length
Surface tension
Dynamic viscosity
18
Density
19
1m
20
Unit
2
m
m or mm
N
m2
9.80665 m
sec 2
m
kg or g
N
m2
N
2
m
m
m
sec
m3
m
m
N
m
N
m
Ns
m2
3
kg m
kg m3
2
Kinematic viscosity
m
mm
sec sec
11