RichConSteel Stakeholder Analysis
RichConSteel Stakeholder Analysis
RichConSteel Stakeholder Analysis
Changes
- Change processes to leverage
IT; no manual workarounds
Stakeholder
Change Needed
Perceived
Benefit
Perceived
Resistance
Capability
(L,M,H)
Readiness
(L, M, H)
Commitm.
None
Staff and
managers
in affected
functional
areas
Use IT; no
more paper
New skills
More info
company
success
Skepticism
given prior
failure;
fear of
another
failure
Effort to
learn IT &
L/M
Commitm.
Let it
Happen
Key Stakeholders
- Staff and managers in
affected functional areas
(sales, purchasing,
warehouse, shop floor,
billing)
- IT staff
- Vendor
Management team
Staff and managers in
affected functional areas
Commitm.
Help it
Happen
Commitm.
Make it
Happen
Action Plan
-Apologize
-Explain need
for change
- Engage in
new
implement.
effort
- Train in
new
process
IT staff
Learn to
configure &
maintain new
IT
Marketabilit
y of skills in
current
technology;
more central
role in org
Skepticism
of prior
failure;
fear of
another
failure;
value of
outdated
IT skills
lost
L/M
L/M
Vendor
Critical
evaluate own
system; Make
modifications;
Properly train
IT staff
Champion IT;
Learn about
IT; Use ITgenerated
reports for
fact-based
decision
making
Revenue,
possible
product
improvement
Loss of
reputation
if errors in
s/w are
found
Restoring
orgs faith in
mgmt and IT
More Infor
better
decisions
company
suceess
Learn IT
and effort
of being
chmapion
L/M
Mgmt
Team
parallel
conversion
environment
-Incenti-vize
to adopt IT
-Apologize
-Engage in
diagnosing
problem with
new IT
-Train on
new IT
- Parallel
conversion as
test &
learning
environment
Negotiate
mutually
beneficial
contract
-Explain need
for
IT/champions
-Engage in
new
implement.
effort
- Train