Aeroelasticity
Aeroelasticity
Aeroelasticity
13 January 2016
Terms that factorize to the left, others to the right. || There is a mathematical expression
for the equilibrium, showing the twist angle in which the elastic restoring forces equal the
steady aerodynamic forces. The dynamic pressure that makes denominator in twist angle eq.
equal to 0 is qdiv. Then:
(0 +
)
1 /
For the case of the matched solution, the standard ISA is introduced as the altitude affects
the value of the density as well as the value of speed of sound.
So once obtained the Mach for different altitudes, a divergence envelope can be obtained for
the Matched Solution (to plot in the Mach & TAS vs Altitude plot). This divergence
envelope should be at least a 15% outside of the aircraft flight envelope (1.15VD/MD).
In this simplified approach, the changes in the wake due to the airfoil motion are not
accounted, hence, 2D quasi-steady aerodynamics is not suitable for aeroelasticity.
Unsteady lift changes instantaneously by a 25% increase and then increases asymptotically
towards the final steady value. This asymptotic behavior occurs due to the change of the
vortex strength, releasing the starting vortex rearwards.
By definition, Wagners function is used to model how the lift acting at the quarter chord
on the airfoil builds up following the step change of incidence.
function which describes how the aerodynamic forces build up upon entering a step gust (lift
increases proportionally as the gust enters to the airfoil without sudden increase of lift).
Figure 1: Wagners function (Left) & Kssners function (Right) lift increase.
Kssners function represent the build of lift due to airfoil penetration in a step gust. The
airfoil is entering the gust progressively. Just after =0 only a very small portion of the
airfoil is inside the gust, therefore, there is no significant increase of lift yet. This is why
the Kssner function value starts at 0.0. When the entire airfoil is inside the step gust, the
Kssner function value is 0.55 (A similar value 0.55 is obtained with the Wagner function
with 2 semi-chords travelled (2c/2).)
Then for R<1 Lf>Lrig (rare case). Only obtained with forward sweep
For R>1 Lf<Lrig (normal case). Only obtained with straight or aft sweep.
When R>>1 the expression becomes:
This condition follows for the case of aft swept wings, with a relatively large
swept angle.
The condition of R=1 is extremely unlikely.
10.
Note that for swept angle positive is for swept back and negative for swept
forward.
As the swept angle is increased, divergence dynamic pressure increases and since
dynamic pressure is proportional to V, it can be concluded that for swept forward
wing velocities have to be much lower than for swept back wings.
11.
Therefore, swept back produces a bending moment that increases the negative
twisting of the airfoil (pitch down)
12.
It is fairly obvious from picture above that for a wing with no sweep, the
frequency of the bending mode is independent of the speed. On the other hand,
swept-back wings increase their their natural frequency with velocity, while
swept-forward wings behave in the other way round.
control surface fittings, the aeroelasticians need out-of-plane bending of these fittings to avoid
spurious control surface lateral modes while stress engineers work with in-plane only.
10. How are the lumped masses connected to the structure? (Use as an
example the NASTRAN element RBE3)
RBE3 allows connecting masses to the structure without adding undesirable extra stiffness. It
connects a reference point with the mass allocated to it with the rest of the structure
considered as hard points through many legs.
14.
The idea is to make a partitioning of the dynamic equation between A-set and O-set. All grid
points with mass or applied forces (note that points with mass may be interpreted as points
where inertia forces will be applied) and some more needed will constitute the Analysis set =
A-set. Most of the grid points with no applied forces: Omitted set: O-set.
Where K is the stiffness matrix and M the mass matrix. NASTRAN uses LANCZOS.
experimental modal analysis (EMA) of the aircraft in frequency range where potentially
dynamic amplifications or destructive aeroelastic instabilities can take place. The results
obtained are natural frequencies, modal shapes, damping and masses. These results are
used to update the dynamic FEM.
In order to perform a GVT, some aspects must be considered:
o
BC: Free-free conditions through the use of bungees (preferred option), pneumatic
platforms (add some uncertainty to damping), deflated tires (not recommended for
new designs) or jacks (bad results because not represent free-free condition).
Rigid Body motion and mode shapes. (Largest RBM frequency should be 3
times lower than first flexible mode)
Sampling:
o Leakage: Dynamic Flight Test DFT takes a cyclic extension of data through
rectangular windows. In order to not to lose information, use Hanning
Windows which decreases side-lobes and widens main lobe.
o Signal Noise: To avoid this, split data span into overlapping segments, apply
window to each segment, apply DFT to each windowed segment and make
and average of the DFT modules. (30-50 averages with 50-75% overlap)
The Phase Separation Method (PSM) excite randomly many modes, hence, the result that
are going to be obtained are not precise (are correct but not exact) because exciting
various modes at the same time it can be obtained one exact mode but the other ones are
not exact. It will measure the FRF and then using Modal Parameter Estimator the
Experimental Modal Model will be obtained.
The Phase Resonance Method (PRM) excite each mode one by one, hence, the result that
is going to be obtained is exact.
One classical excitation of the GVT or FVT is a frequency sweep from very low
frequencies to large frequencies with a constant spectrum. The Frequency Response
Function FRF is the ratio H (w) = X (w)/Y (w). The Dynamic Amplification Factor is
obtained once known the value of H (w) normalized to 1.0 at w0 D = |H (w)|.
The critical damping is the damping needed to change from an oscillating solution to a
non-oscillating solution.
1-dof Experimental Modal Analysis using FRFs
or Dynamic Amplification Factor is a problem of
curve fitting: Determine Omega_n and damping
factor that better match the test result using:
11. Highlight the pros and cons of the different techniques to update
dynamic FE models to match GVT results.
The preferred approach for a dynamic FEM updating to match GVT is the delta-stick
approach. But there are other techniques to update the FE models to match GVT.
o
[Kaa] matrix update: Improve the dynamic FEM model but changing
terms do not have a physical interpretation and only applicable to tested
configurations
Delta stick Approach: It keeps the original check stress model and add
missing stiffness to the mode as a backbone of check stress model. The stick
models runs along the elastic axis of wing, HTP, VTP and fuselage.
Conservative assumptions embodied in the check stress model make the model slightly less
stiff than reality (thats why Delta stick is the preferred). This way allows keeping the
check stress model as it is while the delta stick adds or remove the stiffness in the
components that need to be updated.
Using 2 elements:
Using 3 elements:
And deriving w.r.t t and x, the two equations obtained are combined yielding:
This is the equation of the pressure potential which solution, that satisfies all
constraints, is the pressure doublet. It can be solved with some integrals and
algebra,
In the pressure potential, the doublets are the equivalent to velocity potential
vortices. If the VLM is extended to account for oscillatory motion by adding a
line of incremental oscillatory doublets of constant strength to the bound vortex
along the c/4 of each box, the DLM is obtained.
DLM scope is: Linear Aerodynamic Potential Theory, Subsonic, and Harmonic
Variation of w (t).
3D cases should be solved by using FEM technique (with strong assumptions like:
linearity, small motions, harmonic motion, neglect viscosity and thickness
effects, subsonic, etc)
DLM is modelled using flat thin panels subdivided in trapezoidal boxes.
Singularities are located in the c/4 line with collocation points at 3c/4 of each
box. The steady part is solved using the VLM where singularities are horseshoe
vortices. The unsteady part is solved by using the DLM where singularities are
pressure doublets.
Additional recommendations:
-
Spanwise divisions must be maintained along the different panels located at the
same plane.
Locate more aerodynamic boxes where higher pressure gradients are expected:
wing tips, leading edges
Mess size as a balance between CPU cost and the highest normal mode that has
to be represented because higher normal modes use to have more nodal lines
both spanwise and chordwise that requires an increased number of boxes
Spanwise divisions must be maintained along the different panels located at the
same plane.
Locate more aerodynamic boxes where higher pressure gradients are expected:
wing tips, leading edges
Here G is the spline matrix, that relates the forces and displacements between
structure and aerodynamic models and allows the force and displacement
interpolations.
This matrix G is computed internally by the FEM solver using several
assumption/constraints:
o
Check geometry: Check correct modeling of the FEM and that a correct
meshing has been performed.
The DLM model of the wing is divided in Spanwise strips. The total
aerodynamic lift and total aerodynamic moment of each strip is obtained by
both, the DLM method and the CFD or test and compared between them
In the process to update DLM model, each box of the DLM model strip will
have a pondering factor a.
In a V-g plot, a negative damping obtained from the eigenvalue means that the system is
STABLE (because negative damping should be added to a damped motion to obtain a
harmonic solution).
In the UNSTABLE region, any perturbation that moves the system away from its equilibrium
condition produces a subsequent divergent motion, but this divergent motion is not harmonic.
Positive damping should be added to the divergent motion to obtain an harmonic motion.
In a V-g plot, a positive damping obtained from the eigenvalue, means that the system is
UNSTABLE (because positive damping should be added to a divergent motion to obtain a
harmonic solution)
5- Why the engines are located forward from wing elastic axes in the
current airliners design?
In order to shift forward the Xcg the engines are located forward from wing elastic axes.
Shifting forward the Xcg any up-bending motion will cause a nose down movement, thus
stabilizing the motion from the aeroelastic standpoint.
6- Why are the external stores located forward from wing elastic axes
in current fighters design?
In order to shift forward the Xcg the external stores are located as forward as possible in
military airplanes. Shifting forward the Xcg any up-bending motion will cause a nose down
movement, thus stabilizing the motion from the aeroelastic standpoint.
lifting surface bending mode frequency has a smooth evolution with flight speed. Therefore,
there is a range of velocities in which there is a coalescence of frequencies between the control
surface rotation mode and the lifting surface bending mode.
If the control surface is not mass balanced, the control surface center of gravity lies well behind
the hinge line. An up movement of the lifting surface will generate a positive rotation on the
control surface due to inertia coupling by the rear c.g. position. This will create a curvature in
the airfoil that will create additional positive lift that in turn will tend to increase the
movement. Similarly, a down movement of the lifting surface will generate a negative rotation
of the control surface. This creates a curvature in the airfoil that will generate negative lift
again tending to increase the movement. This is an unstable behavior: flutter.
In the plot showing the damping evolution with flight speed, the mode corresponding to the
control surface will be always well damped but the mode corresponding to the lifting surface
will exhibit flutter in the same velocity range of frequency coalescence.
The stability situation of the system can be reserved by mass balancing the control surface. If
weight is added ahead of the hinge line, the coupling between control surface and bending will
be progressively removed. If the control surface c.g. lies ahead of the hinge line, the physical
behavior of the control surface following a movement of the lifting surface will be exactly the
opposite as the one described above, and therefore, the effect of the resulting airfoil induced
curvature will always have a stabilizing effect.
meaning
that the
internal
loop:
V-g
plot
Elaborated plots of flutter boundaries versus flight envelope for each mass configuration are
obtained from the successive V-g plots calculated for each Mach number. From them the
flutter mechanisms are identified and classified: Symmetric or Antisymmetric, Flutter speed
and flutter frequency, Whether they are inside, close to or outside the flight envelope, whether
they are mild, moderate, severe, abrupt & Level of reliability of the mechanism.
One way to assess the reliability is by the isolation of the mechanism. In the aeroelasticians
jargon, isolation of flutter mechanism means determine the minimum number of normal modes
that reproduces the instability.
10-
11-
Like all the stability problems, flutter does not depend of the initial conditions.
12-
If the position of the center of mass is changed with this new system, flutter analysis have to
be redo. (Remind that just an additional paint layer can change the CG position).
This sensitivity is performed to all flutter mechanisms and all control surfaces (x3)
The stability situation of the system can be reserved by mass balancing the control surface.
If weight is added ahead of the hinge line, the coupling between control surface and bending
will be progressively removed. If the control surface c.g. lies ahead of the hinge line, the
physical behavior of the control surface following a movement of the lifting surface will be
exactly the opposite as the one described above, and therefore, the effect of the resulting
airfoil induced curvature will always have a stabilizing effect.
In order to solve the probability of failure of actuators, put two actuators to avoid failure.
Engines
9- What
of
the
following
design
changes
substantiated?
1. Add winglets at the wing tip (YES/NO)
2. Open the rear door (YES/NO)
3. Deflect the ailerons (YES/NO)
4. Etc
need
to
be
flutter
For the first case, YES. Winglets will modify all aspect related with flutter analysis: winglet
mass affects wing modes, winglet aerodynamics modify wing aerodynamic and stiffness is
affected due to the addition of reinforcements.
For the second case, YES. As the structure pass from a closed section to an open section,
modifying the rear fuselage stiffness and therefore a significant drop in frequency of rear
fuselage anti-symmetric torsion modes. Here, the anti-symmetric tail flutter mechanisms are
significantly affected by this drop of stiffness.
For the third case, NO. As ailerons are already mounted in the wing it will not affect the
mass aspect.
For the rest of cases, every aircraft feature that may have an effect on the normal modes
should be substantiated from the flutter standpoint.
10-
11-
In current composite control surfaces, the effect of composite delamination should be assessed
from the flutter standpoint.
The control surface area most critical use to be the area located immediately outboard of the
actuators.
As the delaminated area increases, the flutter mechanism tends to become severe. This
information is used to define the maximum allowable delamination inside the Aircraft
Maintenance Manual.
12-
13-
Aeroservoelasticity is the study of the interaction of all elements relevant for aeroelasticity
plus Flight Control System laws. (Requested in Airworthiness Regulations).
The solution options are limited to filtering the gyro output signal or moving the gyro to a
different location. The gyro can be relocated from the forward position to the anti-node
which eliminates the vibration [Notch filter to eliminate all the undesired responses but adds
a delay]
14-
Ensure that the aircraft is free from flutter in all its envelope up to Vd/Md,
In order to avoid confusion with the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) acronym, the acronym for
Flight Flutter Test is FVT.
It is explicitly required by the administrator in CS25.629. The test has to be performed when
a change in the structure is applied, although the change include an improvement in the flutter
behavior. When the change is insignificant such as including an antenna there is no need to
do the test.
Ensure that all modes are properly damped and that there is not rapid decrease of
damping of any mode inside the aircraft flight envelope. (Clear the flight envelope
from the flutter standpoint).
Controlled excitation: There are several ways to excite the aircraft like natural turbulence,
bonkers (but they change the aerodynamics of the wing), external aerodynamic vanes (located
at the wing tip): Oscillatory vanes & Aerodynamic vanes with slotted Trailing Edge and the
control surfaces of the aircraft. From this last one, in aircraft with manual controls, stick raps
are used (pilot hit the stick with a hammer and it is excited); in aircraft with actuators and
FCS, pulses and sine sweeps are used. When the aircraft can fly at stabilized conditions, it is
better to use sweep and pulse. In flight points that can only be achieved by diving, only pulses
can be performed when aircraft crosses exactly the flight point conditions. At Vd/Md the
aircraft may be excited only with natural turbulence.
Transducers: Accelerometers, normally located at wing and tail tips, engines and rear and
forward fuselage.
Data acquisition: The same considerations as for GVT.
-
Sampling. Should be large enough to capture all phenomena. The typical value are
on the range of 128-512 samples per second. Nyquist frequency is half of the
sampling frequency.
Noise: To avoid this, split data span into overlapping segments, apply window to
each segment, apply DFT to each windowed segment and make and average of the
DFT modules. (30-50 averages with 50-75% overlap).
Real Time Analysis: FVT are analyzed at the same time as it is being performed. Aircraft
data and voice is received in the telemetry room of the flight test center so decisions can be
made at real time.
Oscillatory vanes
Stick raps
Pulses
Sine sweeps
The preferred option is logically the use of the same control surfaces of the aircraft: in this
way, the configuration of the aircraft being tested in FVT is identical to the series aircraft.
-
In the flight points that the aircraft can fly at stabilized conditions; both, sweep
and pulses are performed
In the flight points that can only be achieved by diving, only pulses can be
performed when the aircraft crosses exactly the flight point conditions
For the final point at Vd/Md the aircraft is excited only with natural turbulence
6- Explain the similitude and the differences between GVT and FVT
In the flight points that the aircraft can fly at stabilized conditions; both, sweep
and pulses are performed
In the flight points that can only be achieved by diving, only pulses can be
performed when the aircraft crosses exactly the flight point conditions
For the final point at Vd/Md the aircraft is excited only with natural turbulence.
2- Define loads
Aircraft structural loads or actions are forces, deformations or accelerations applied to the
structure or its components.
-
Excess load or overloading may cause structural failure, and hence such possibility
should be either considered in the design or strictly controlled
Loads are consequences of the aircraft operations (loads due to taxi, take-off, etc.)
Checkstress loads (limit loads and ultimate loads) for exceptional operation
Depending on the aircraft operation phase in which they can be met, the loads can be classified
as:
-
Flight Loads
Ground Loads
Depending on whether they are steady or variable, the loads can be classified as:
-
Static Loads
Dynamic Loads
Strength requirements are specified in terms of limit loads (the maximum loads
expected in service) and ultimate loads (limit loads multiplied by safety factor). Unless
otherwise provided, prescribed loads are limit loads
Unless otherwise provided the specified air, ground and water loads must be placed in
equilibrium with inertia forces, considering each item of mass in the airplane. These
loads must be distributed to conservatively approximate or closely represent actual
conditions. Methods used to determine load intensities and distribution must be
validated by flight load measurement unless the methods used for determining those
loading conditions are shown to be reliable
first
bending
mode.
The
On the other hand, if the frequency of the excitation is close to the second bending mode, the
response will be in the second bending mode, very different from a static solution. The
evolution of shear force along the beam may even change of sign (not intuitive if compared
with a static solution).
9- What is a 2d envelope
10-
Nodal loads are those nodes that has a point/nodal load. In order to select which nodes have
loads, a criteria is followed: Max/Min criteria (looking at moment vs time plot and finding
max and min) & 2D envelopes criteria (selecting the critical points/corners of the 2D
envelope).
The phenomenon is exacerbated in military aircraft that must operate in unpaved runways.
Taxi loads are used for:
-
For military tactical aircraft Vz = 12 ft/s while for On-board carrier aircraft Vz = 18ft/s.
For military aircraft taxi operations also have to be in unprepared surfaces (DEF-STAN A,B)
Landing Gear Drop Test: Verification and validation of the landing gear model
including confirmation of the spin-up & spring-back effects. Both effects are
simulated in drop test by making the wheel rotate in the opposite sense at the
corresponding angular speed.
-
Aircraft firm or Hard Landings: Used to validate the coupling between landing gear
and aircraft by comparing numerical simulations with test results.
10-
which an artificial (1-cos) bump of known height and length has been introduced. It
validates the taxi model. [Better explained in next question]
11-
Unpaved runway roughness severity may be compared by using EBH curves (EBH=
Equivalent Bump Height).
These curves show the height (H) of the obstacle that the aircraft is able to pass
without exceeding limit loads. This height H depends on the bump length (L).
Typically the larger the wavelength, the large the height that the aircraft is able to
pass.
The EBH curve can be also computed for each runway depending on its roughness (it
is a pure geometrical curve) obtained by convolution with a (1-cos) mask.
If the EBH curve of the runway is below (i.e. less severe) than the EBH of the aircraft,
then this aircraft can operate (taxi) in that runway without problems.
If the EBH curve of the runway is above (i.e. more severe) than the EBH that the
aircraft can withstand then the aircraft cannot operate in that runway. The taxi tests
are performed in a paved runway in which an artificial (1-cos) bump of known height
and length has been introduced.
The taxi tests are performed in a paved runway in which an artificial (1-cos) bump of known
height and length has been introduced.
12-
Aircraft regularly encounter atmospheric turbulence (or rough air) of varying degrees
of severity
Turbulence may be considered as movement of the air through which the aircraft
passes
Any component of the velocity of the air (so-called gust velocity) that is normal to
the flight path will change the effective incidence of the aerodynamics surfaces, so
causing sudden changes in the lift forces and hence a dynamic response of the aircraft
involving flexible deformation
The response will involve both the rigid body and the flexible modes, may give rise to
passenger and crew discomfort and will introduce internal loads that need to be
considered for aircraft safety.
Thus it is important for the safe design of the aircraft to calculate the response and
internal loads generated under the conditions defined by the Airworthiness
Regulations, and to evaluate the effect on the fatigue life.
Gust and turbulence loads are significant throughout the aircraft. The most relevant
aircraft components affected by gust and turbulence are:
Discomfort:
o
o
-
o
-
Gust/turbulence loads is a design condition for nearly all part of the structure
of modern airliners, for both static and fatigue sizing
Current gust loads computation criteria, are adequate: there is nearly no event
of a main structure failure due to a gust in recent aviation history.
3- Describe
the
ways
to
measure
the
atmospheric
turbulence,
A dynamic effect depends on the frequency content of the input gust profile.
The response of the aircraft to gust loads modifies the input gust profile experienced
by the aircraft
Unsteady aerodynamics
Gust penetration
General criteria:
2fg<fmax<3fg
At Vc: at least sea level and the kink at the highest Mach number. Sometimes
intermediate values and high altitude cases
At Vd: at least sea level and the kink at the highest Mach number
Maximum Take Off Weight (MTOW), both with low fuel and with max fuel,
including several payload configurations covering all possible centers of gravity
10-
The gust excitation is represented with (1-cos) shape gust. The analysis should consider
enough gust lengths between 30ft and 350ft
Gust intensity (at Vc, sea level) will be 56 ft/s for long gust lengths. The gust intensity
will be reduced for shorter gust lengths.
Gust intensity is also reduced for altitudes higher than sea level.
11-
12-
If y(t) is the transient response to an excitation f(t) (with its own rms value),
then the term in aeroelastic response is usually used to reflect the ratio
between the rms of the response with respect to the rms of the excitation:
3- Definition of PSD
Why PSD is useful in solving dynamic problems? Because there is a direct relationship
between PSD output and PSD input through the transfer function:
The PSD excitation requested by current airworthiness regulations for continuous turbulence
analysis is the Von-Karman Spectrum.
The Von-Karman spectrum concentrates most of the excitation at very low frequencies.
10-
11-
An ellipse
12-
13-
14-
Wing buffet (usually self-generated, i.e., flow separation of the same lifting
surface)
o
May be due to
Alpha (AoA)
VTP affected by flow separated from the wing leading edge apex
Pods/Pod fin
Buffet:
- Buffet is a RESPONSE problem
- Buffet is the structural response to flow separation. Buffet loads are loads produced by
flow separation. Most often is the response of a single mode.
- Buffet use to be a fatigue issue
- Buffet onset usually triggered by angle of attack
10-
11-
12-
AERODYNAMIC SIDE:
STRUCTURAL SIDE:
13-
14-
15-