Peterson 1 Detailed Report of Operations in Search of Sanskrit Manuscripts 1883

This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized
by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the

information in books and make it universally accessible.
https://books.google.com
in the ( of IgUw tyovh
Jib vary
Jornal WuntX
ittt mtmamoiteli
L.i

DETAILED
REPORT
/
OF
OPERATIONS SEAKCH OF SANSKEIT MSS.

IN THE BOMBAY CIRCLE,
August 1882March 1883.
t
PEOFESSOR PETER PETERSON.
e:x:t:r..a_ - , \
JOURNAL OF THE BOMBAY BRANCH OF THE ROYAL
ASIATIC SOCIETY.
18 8 3.
BOMBAY :
SOCIETY'S LIBRARY, TOWN HALL.
LONDON:
TRBNER & Co., 57 & 59 LUDGATE HILL.
f2 fi
1/1-2.
CONTENTS.
Rbport of Operations
1 72
Extracts from MSS. acquired for Government, and

from others belonging to H. H. the Mahrna
of Oodeypore
73111
List of MSS. acquired for Government
113132
Appendix I. Catalogue of the Palm-leaf MSS. in

Sntinth's Bhandr, Cambay ... ( 1 ) (103)
*
i
Appendix II.Bana ; his predecessors and contemporaries
5
i
-1
>
.
-;
M
X
M
372937
(105) (129)
JOURNAL
OF .THE
BOMBAY BRANCH
OF THE
ttOYAL ASIATIC SOCIETY.

EXTRA NUMBER.
Detailed Report of Operations in search of Sanskrit MSS. in

the Bombay Circle, August 1882 March 1883. By
Professor Petek Peterson.
The operations in search of Sanskrit manuscripts in the Bombay
Circle* have been under the joint charge of Professor Bhandorkar
and myself since August 1882, when Professor Bhandarkar, who,
on Dr. iCielhorn's departure, had been put by the Director of Public
Instruction in sole charge, was invited by that officer, in accordance
with Government Resolution No. 582, dated 21st April, 1882, to
make over part of the work to me. It ' was then agreed between us
that we should divide equally the amount that remained (Rs. 4,952)
of the grant for the year, and that while the Bombay Professor
should be generally in charge of the Northern, and the Poona
Professor in charge of the Southern Division, it should be open to
cither of us at any time, after mutual consultation, to push the
objects of the search in any part of the Circle that might bo
deemed expedient. The arrangement has worked, I believe, to the
entire satisfaction of both of usa result largely due to that
liberality of feeling, and unselfishness of motive, which have
won for Mr. Bhandarkar the respect of all who have watched
* The Bombay Circle includes, besides tlio Presidency of Bombay, liujputana, Central India, and the Central Provinces
OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OF SANSKRIT MSS.
his career ; and it is substantially the arrangement under which

we are now together prosecuting the search. What follows then
is a statement of my own operations in the joint work for that
portion of the past year during which I was entrusted with part
of it.
The close of the monsoon term set me free from my College
duties, and on the 18th of September I left Bombay for Jeypore.*
My specific object in beginning with Jeypore was to ascertain
whether the copies kindly ordered by the Jeypore Durbar to be made
of such books in the Royal Library as appeared to Dr. Bhler to be
desirable acquisitions had been made ; and, if possible, to secure them.
On my arrival, I called on Major Prideaux, then Acting Resident at
Jeypore, who had already promised to interest himself in this matter,
* On the way I took occasion to Tint Mount Abn. Beyond an m h it my am, which purported to be a part of the Sivapurana, and which did not
to bo worth the trouble of copying (the owner not being willing to part
with it), this digression did not, of course, offer anything directly connected
with the object of my tour : and a detailed account of the many placee of
surpassing interest on tho hill would be out of place hero. I should like how
ever to say that having had the good fortuno to be admitted within the
shrine at Achaleswara, where tho mark of the toe of the god Siva is to " be seen
unto this day," and having carefully examined that mark, I am disposed to
thin* that it contains the explanation of the curious knob on the left of the
figure of the Pramara prince, whioh stands facing the temple of Vasishtha at the
other ond of the hill. Tho one is an exact copy of the other ; and the " toe-nail of
the devil " was probably ono of the cherished insignia of the royal houso of the
time. I was able to secure admittance both to this shrine and to that of Va
sishtha. It may be worth saying here that my almost uniform experience
in that matter leads me to believe that any traveller who does not
scruple to show, by outward symbol, that he respects the reverence in
which theBe sacred places aro held, will be allowed free entrance, and will be
treated with all courtesy. To be able to speak Sanskrit is of course often an
additional recommendation ; though many of these shrines are now in the
keeping of men who cannot speak two words of that language. There may be
circumstancos in which persons officially representing tho government of
tho country, or an alion church, may hesitate to comply with the condition
universally attached to such a concession. No such considerations need
trammel tho scholar in search of knowledge. And as far as personal feelings
are concerned, I do not envy those of the man who can stand before tho ruinod
shrine of Vasishtha, or enter the porch of the Karli cave, while fancy conjures
up the innumerable company of men and women who have worshipped where
he now is, without saying to himself, Put off thy shoes from off thy feet : for
the place whereon thou standest is holy ground.
IN THE BOMBAY CIRCLE.
and in my work generally; and to -whom I am exceedingly indebted

for the trouble he took to help me. Learning from Major Prideaux
that a day or two must elapse before I could hope to be admitted to
a library, which is, as a rule, not easy of access, I resolved to spend
the interval in making the acquaintance of such of the pandits of
the place as I might be able to put myself in communication with.
A visit to the free publio library an institution which reflects
the greatest credit on the Jeypore administration, and to which
there is, I am afraid, no parallel in Bombay*as also to H. H. the
Maharaja's Sanskrit school, soon made the fact and object of my
visit widely known; and daring the few days I was able to devote
to Jeypore I had the opportunity of explaining the objects and plans
of the search to more than one intelligent pandit and native
gentleman, from whose oo-operation in the future I anticipate the
happiest results. The immediate fruit of my intercourse with
some of these men 1 propose to examine in the paragraphs that
follow. I will only add here, that my experience at Jeypore, and
throughout this tour, confirmed me in the belief that while there is
much which the native scholar may learn from the European scholar,
there is more, in that which is of common interest to the two, that
the European can learn from the native. No one who is not himself
a student of Sanskrit letters can fully realise how dense and farspreading the cloud is that, to our eyes, still hangs over the history
of the literature. But no candid mind can engage in the study
ofthat history in India without recognising that much, which remain
for the European to discover, has never been hid from the native
learned community. t
* The Jeypore Free Library wae founded by the late Maharaja at the
instigation of a medical missionary ; and it is amusing to note that one of its
chief features is wha,t must certainly be the most complete collection of
Scotch sermons that exists anywhere east of the Lothians. Under the present
management an attempt is being made to supplement these with books more'in
keeping with the surroundings ; and there is, in particular, a very fair collection of
Sanskrit books.
f It is to be regretted, I think, that Government, in adopting Dr. Kielhorn'a
scheme for entrusting the work of cataloguing the Foona collection to
scholars in Europe, should have appeared to accept Mr. Whitley Stokes' view,
pressed upon them by the author of the seheme, that that work could not be
done in India. " 1 know of no native scholar possessed of the requisite learning,
accuracy, and persistent energy," eaid Mr. Stokes in 1868. I do not know that
Mr. Stokes had any special claims to speak with authority on such a point.
Tho Chnmchnryftsntakam nnd

Uu.Chaturvargasa.bgrahaof Kshe-
Among my first acquisitions in

Jeypore were two small works
which mngt be ^^ ^ ^^
long list of writings by the Kashmirian author, Kshemendra.* The Ch ch a r y s a t a k a m,

No. 51,t of that writer, isa century of moral aphorisms in very simple
Sanskrit, each with a sanction of the orthodox kind appended, which
gives a quaint and pleasing picture of virtue's Ways of Pleasantness
as they appeared to the Kashmir poet of the eleventh century.
Here, for example, is Ksheinendra's version of our proverb " The
early bird catches the worm" :
" Ono hour before sunrise let a man resolutely shake off sleep : the
lotus wakens early, and therefore it is that a discriminating Goddess
of Beauty (prosperity) takes up her abode there."
But tho best of the few European Orientalists who have hail tho good fortuno
to bo able to pursue their studies in India, have never been slow to confess their
obligations to tho accuracy, learning, and energy hero so ruthlessly depre
ciated. Thero have been of course exceptions. I havo before me now a
Eeport, which is to my mind chiefly remarkable from the fact that, neither
on trie covers, nor anywhero within tho covers, does the European scholar,
whoso namo appears on the title-page, give that of the native who, unaided,
and after great exertions, procured for Government the valuable collection of
palm-leaf MSS. complacently exhibited, or make any reference at all to tho
other native collaboratour without whose special knowledge of Milgadh, and tho
Jain literature, that part of tho Eeport, I make bold to say, could not have
been written. Such a proceedingand it does not, I regret to think, stand
alonomay tend to confirm the relative estimate of native and European
learning ; but it is at tho expense, I submit, of something more valuablo
than even a character for learning.
* For Kshemendra, see Biihler's very valuablo Beport of his Kashmir tour,
published as an extra number of the Journal of tho Bombay Branch of tho
Boyal Asiatic Society, to which I shall have to make constant reference. Of
Kshemendra's works there were known to European scholars, previous to
Biihler's visit to tho poet's home, (1) Yrhatkathamajnrl, (2) Bhratamanjar,
(3)Kalvilea. Bhler found in Kashmir (4) Kamnvanamajar, (5) Das&vataracliaritn, (0) Samayamatrika, (7) Suvrittatilaka, (8) Lokaprnksa, (9) a
commentary on Vysa's Nitikalpataru, and (10) a Vynsshtaka found at
the end of a copy of the Bhrutamaiijarl.
t Tho references are to the list of MSS. purchased by me for Government
during the period under report, which will be found at the end of this paper.
The motive for another maxim is probably a sanitary one still

in force in India :
^n^T^TÎTf^ f%: ^^ 4rfrid: II
*' Do not sleep with your head to the north or the west : Diti slept in
a wrong position : and Indra was able to slay the fruit in her womb."
The reference here is to a story told in the first book of the Rmyana. Other examples from the Chrracharysatakam will be found
in the extracts at the end of this report.
The other hitherto unknown work by Kshemendra is the
Ch a t r v a r g a s a m g r a h a, No. 61 , which is, as its title indicates,
a concise exposition of the whole doctrine of the four great motives
of human activityduty, money, love, salvation. In that part of
the first chapter which treats of the duties of master and servant I
find a verse which looks like a bit of Kshemendra's personal history.
It is a vindication of the honourable character, as a profession, of
service rendered to a worthy master.
ft^'irar $\ \ (- frufr
*f rifar %Tf |^" %4M1. 1
sTFir' <lsH<i f^rr 3 ?ref*Hi u

" This chapter on service has been drawn up by Kshemendra, iwith
a single eye to please learned men, himself full of the happiness that
comes of the service of content. Men live by their professions : and
in the case of some service is the profession to which they are born.
It is when service is rendered to an unworthy object that it is bitter
and blameable."
I may interpolate here a short account of
The Suvrittatilaka
Kshemendra'
of
- -,
j >
- n t 'i i
u-i
Kshemendra s buv ritt a ti Laica, which
was first discovered by Biihlerin Kashmir,
and a second ccpy of which was one of my Jeypore acquisitions.* The
* " The new treatise ou metrics, Kshemendra's Suvrittatilaka, So. 270, is
very clearly written, and valuable on account of numerous quotations which
illustrate the rules. The authors' names areaded to many of them." Kashmir
Keport, p. 69. It would perhaps be going too far to say that in these early
works on rhetoric illustrations that bear no name are to be understood to be
by the author himself, though I am disposed to think that that was the
practice. The presumption is perhaps strongest when, as here, the name is
sometimes given and sometimes withheld, without any such intimation as is
usual in the later anthologies that the source is unknown.
work, as Bhler pointed out, is valuable on account of the nume

rous quotations found in the second and third chapters, which are
in all cases accompanied by the name of the author, and which
consequently enable us to fix a terminus ad quem for more than one
poet in whose case such a limit was a desideratum. The three
chapters, or vinysas, into which the book is divided, are called
respectively (1) Vrittvachaya, (2) Gunadoshadarsanam, and (3)
Vrittaviniyoga. The vrittas or turnsit is curious to note, in
passing, how closely vritta and verse correspond to each other in
meaning enumerated in the first vinysa are as follows : (1) tanumadhyft, (2) kumralalit, (3) vidyunml, (4) pramn, (5) anashtubh,
(G) bhujagagrasisusyita,* (7) rukmavat, (8) indravajr, (!) upendravajr, (10) upajti, (11) slin, (12) rathoddhat, (13) svgat,
(14) totakam, (15) vamsastham.t (16) drutavilambitam, (17) praharMv MS. of the Suvrittatilaka was not bought for Government : but wag
presented to me by my friend, Pandit Durg Prasda. In the comparatively
few in which MSS. have thus been put at my disposal, I have gone on
the rule of making over to the collection all MSS. that are new, or more
correct than copies already there. Others I have felt at liborty to retain.
* BhujaggrasisusritA, MS-, Bhujaggreiusrita. The word takes this form
to suit the metre. The more common form appears in the example ;
=RfrT ^fTt
! tf-
$^^ II
The example shows that this metre ended, according to Kshemendra, in thre
long syllables, the scheme being ouwuuu
repeated four times,
and not vjv*j\j\j\j-u\j as Weber, Ind. Stud. 8, 170, followed by
tho St. Petersburg Dictionary, has it. Colebrooke, Essays I., 141, gives
Kshemendra's scheme.
t The expression in the rule, vamsasthkhyam leaves us in doubt whether
the word is vamsastha, or vamsastha. Colebrooke writos it with the short
vowel : Wober with the long. The St. Petersburg Dictionary intimates a
doubt. Kshemendra's example :
'!
TRfr tiff: ffJSTr: I
RldM'-HHfrn %4tfrt ^
f^lia^lCVfP?! ipfri^f: Il
makes for the short syllable. In the case of the example from B4na in the
second vinysa, cited further ou, the metro is called vamsastham ('. e. vrittam).
See also p. 11.
shini, (18) vasantatilakam, (19) mlin, (20) narkutam, (21) prithv,

(22) harin, (23) sikbarin, (24) mandkrant. With one exception,
that of the annshtubh metre, where the verse
tffi: -^ ohi4'flJ^4^Hr I
14 ^5 iffsTT ftJIrt'tbdl II
is cited from bhagavad Vysa, the examples given of these various
metres are by the author himself, and are so composed that each
serves at once to the eye or ear as a versus memorialis both of the
character and of the name of the particular metre. Thus the scheme
of the first, the tanumadhy metre, in the technical language of
Indian prosody* being ty (. e.
u V
) four times
repeated, the illustration runs
^ Wfrtl+1 4% ^
II
sa
This verse is in the tanumadhy metre : the word tanumadhy is
an integral part of it : and the initial letters of the two lines of which
it is composed give the scheme of the metre.
What importance for the history of the literature the Suvrittatilaka possesses begins with the second vinysa, which is a
concise exhibition of the merits and faults observable in poems. The
authors cited there and in the next vinysa, which enquires into
the reasons that make one metre suitable, and another Dot, in
each particular case, are Abhinanda, bhatta Indurja, srmad Utpalarja, Kalasaka, Klidsa, Gandinaka, Chakra,f Taijra, Dipaka,
bhatta Nryana,J Parimala, Bna (MS. Vna), Bhartrimentha,
Bhartrihari, Bhavabhti, Bhravi, Muktkana, sr Tasovarman,
* See Colebrooke's Essaya, loc. cit. Aufrecht in his notice of the Srutabodha,
a work whoso author calls himself Klidsa, and in which the rules them
selves are examples of the various metres, refers to the case of Torentianus
Mauras, a grammarian of the first century who composed a handbook of Latin
prosody on a similar plan.
f Called also r Chakra.
J The quotation is from the Vensamhra.
The two verses "jayanti vnsuramaulilalith" and "namimi bharvoscharanmbujadvayam," are cited from the introductory verses to Kdambiiri,
to show how the vasantatilaka suffers (ytyanarghatm) if each pda ends in
visarga, and how it is improved if that fault be avoided.
OPERATIONS IN SHAKCH OK SANSKRIT MSS.
Ratnfikara,* Rjasekhara, Rissu, Ltadindra, bhatta Vallata, Vradeva, SAhila, bhatta Symala, r Ilarshadeva, and the author himself.
In tin's list the following names are, so far as I know, new : Kalaeaka.t Gandinaka, Chakra, Jinjra, Muktkana, Rissu, Ltadindra,
Vallata,^ Viradeva, Symala, Shila. The verss quoted from these
poets will be found in the extracts given at the end of this Report.
The discussion on the ' fitness of metres' which occupies the last
chapter, yields some not unimportant items of information for our
purpose. The authenticity of the work last noticed, the Chaturvarga, is vouched for by what I take to be a specific reference to
that book. Having laid down that the compositions to which the
rules of prosody refer are of four kinds, being either scientific
(sstram), or poetic (kvyam), or quasi-poetic (sstra-kavyam, in
struction conveyed in the guise of poetry), or lastly, quasi-scientific
(kvya-iAstram, in which the author's skill in poetry is of more
account than the instruction he professes to be anxious to convey),
Kshemendra goes on to say that books like the Chaturvarga aro
instances of the third kind, while the poems of Bhatti and Bhaumaka
are examples of the fourth. Pandit Durgu Prasda, from whom
T'Tlt frrE3* +Irftl4j

fbTHTisirft iX^rrrrjq^TrtfttIJ^TJ^Tl^RlPra 4fc#: Il
This is tho first verse of Ratiiukara's Hnravijaya. Biilitcr's SHU.'H for
['< (Report, p. cxxv.) is probably a misprint. Both hero, and in the two
works by Batnkara, to be referred to immediately, his tillo is given as
Vidydhipati, not Vidyupati.
f A Kaiasa however is quoted in tho Srngadharapaddhati.Aufrecht's
article in the mngazino of tho Gorman Orioutal Society.
% Called also bhatta Vallata.
^TlSPfir ^ fl^'KTf^ I
>fft4far<Rp2f ( ms fr ) *1? *$ II
Kshemondra's similo in illustration of the first kind of poetical composition,
that which is puro science, has a strangely familiar ring :
rTi 3i4ri3llUfa %t%<4i|4| TjJtrt I
"Of these four kinds somo use poetry in matters of pure scioucc as mou
I procured the present MS., had heard of a poem, resembling the

Bhattikvya, by Bhaumaka, called the RvariArjunyam. Bhler
brought from Kashmir a fragment of a work " called Rvanrjunya
or Arjunarvanya," whose author's name he gives as Bhima or
Bhimabhatta, which " resembles the Bhattikvya, and is intended
to illustrate the rules of grammar."* It may be presumed,
I think, that this is the same book, and that Kshemendra's text gives
the author's real name.
Immediately below this passage Kshemendra quotes as an instance
of an injudicious display of poetical merits, in the discussion of a
scientific subject, a verse on medicine by VAgbhatta. Before quitting
the Suvrittatilaka it must be noted that Kshemendra lends no support
to the identification of Bhartrihari with either Bhatti or Bhartrimentba, all three being referred to in the course of the book.
Another of his own writings to which Kshemendra refers in this
chapter is the P av eh as i ti, a work which has still, so
far as I know, to bo recovered. In yet another place Kshemendra
preserves for us the first verso of Bh a r trim en th ' lost poem
the II a y a g r % v av a dh a. The passage is interesting as confirming
what Bhler has already pointed out from Hemachandra's Alamkrachdmani, namely, that the Ilayagrvavadha was a kvya not a
ntaka, and was divided into sargasf:-
:
_#
nse a picco of sugar to counteract the taste of a pungent medicine." Tin's is
Horace with a new face
Ridentem discero verum
Quid vctat ? ut pueris olim dant crustula blaudi
Doctores, elementa velint ut disecro prima.
Horace. Satires, Bk. I., Sat. 1, 1. 25.
Laughing, to teach the truth,
What hinders ? As some teachers givo to boys
Junkets and knacks, that they may learn apace.
(Milton's translation of that passage.)
* Kashmir Report, p. 61.
+ " The Rjatarangin mentions . . . Mentha, the protege of Mtrigupta.
. . . I may add that Mr. Troyer is wrong in declaring that Mcntha's
great work, the Hayagrivavadha, was a nfita-ka. The phrase (Rajat. III. JtiO)
hayagrivavadham Menthas tadagro darsayan navara, "when Mentha showed
the new ' Death of Hayagriva/ in his (Mtrigupta' s) presence" is ambiguous. It
may mean that the poet showed the MS. only and read it. Hemachandra's
Alaihkfirachdfimai.ii proves that this interpretation is the right one, as at the
end of Adhyuya IV. it names the Hayagrivavadha as a specimen of a kvya, and
declares that it was divided into saigas or cantos.'' Kashmir Report, p. 42.
10
WHTTWfrTW frT: 4KJc4ggJT3j|
^- 5* TTfT: Rlri-esS-^f^HI: *: II
The end of the chapter, in which the author cites various poets of
the olden time (purvakavayah) as excelling1 in one or other kind of
metre, is of sufficient importance to be given in fall :
<# trf% fTrfr f^S : |
T ITT firrc%nr?rcff ffer %% II

T #w ^ #$ II
<RTfWft: WH: "^NI44 iA*l<\ I
^^1^*1<'1<^,15; 1 1
+ <hiPh<jhi ff^fr I
fWPT^T ^^ ^" ^^: 1 1
^liM-NrT'gf |*1|| I
3<-=^| ^l4aUll*lPlHl I
4^J^: ** I
<*iR*<*i*Hr4 ? ^ \
Hfv 44*^f 5Rtfnrgtnrprr II
Kshemendi- here, after speaking slightingly of the poet who has

exercised himself in one form of metre only, or perchance in two,
and who is therefore, liko a poor man who gives a feast, obliged to
make shift with what ho has, no matter what the occasion may be,
notices that some of the poets of byegone days, not open to any
such reproach, had a great fondness for one or other particular metre.
Abhinanda loved the anustubh, which was in his mouth as potent
as the ball of magic in the mouth of a Vidydliara.* Pnini is as
The ball, by holding which in his mouth, the Vidydhara can transport
himself to anv distance.
IN THE BOMBAY CIECLE.
11
enticing with his upajtis as is a garden full of jUi flowers. The

varnsastha (as tho metre is here plainly called), was Bhravi's favorite,
as the vasantatilaka was Ratnkara's. Bhavabhti loved tho
sikharin!, and K;ilidsa the mandkrnta. Rjasekhara's fondness
for the srdulakrditam closes the list. The significance of the
reference to Pacini here I propose to examine later.
Lastly, there is in the Bhao Dji Collection, deposited in the
Library of the Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, a work
attributed to Kshemcndra, called the Has tij anaprakds a, but
this I regret I have not yet been able to examine.
The SmbapachasikKshemendra, there is reason to suppose,
viraranam of Rjnuka was in his youth a Saiva, and was conJ
verted later to the Vaishnava-Bhgavata
creed by Somchrya.* He studied the Alamkrasstra under tho
famous Abhinavaguptchrya. When therefore we find, No. 212, a
commentary on a panchsik in honour of iva, written by a
KshemarAja, who describes himself as a pupil of Abhinavagupta,
I think that the presumption is in favour of the hypothesis that
in Kshemarja and Kshemendra we have, as is often the case, two
names of identical purport for one and the same writer.f
But I put forward this identification with all reserve, as it has the
weight of Bhler's authority against it. Bhler, who first found the
Smb panchsik vivaranam, has himself proposed the identification
of our Kshemarja with a Kshemendra who wrote a Spandasamdoha
and a Spandaniruaya, both of which it has to be noted deal, like the
Smbapanchasikavivaranam, with the Kashmirian Saivite doctrine :
but that Kshemendra he regards as " certainly different from Kshe
mendra Vysadasa."
_
,,.,.,
The Muktlatsatakam
and Kfijendrakarnapra of
ambhn.
> the curious account of the sabh

, .,
, ,
neld afc tne house ot Alamkura, minister
of king Jayasimha (1129-1150 a. d.)
to hear the brother of that statesman
* Bhler's Kashmir Eoport, p. 40.

+ Kshemarja may liare changed his name to Kshemendra at tho time of
his conversion, as Saul changed his to Paul. For the extent to which synonyms
are need in tho sphere even of proper names in India, see so ne remarks by
Max Mller in tho valuable noto ho has appended to his ' India : What can It
teach us ?' (p. 314). \Vc shall soo later a caso whore tho poet Harsha has lain
concealed under the synonym Kuchikara.
12
Mankha* read his new poem the Srikanfchacharita, mention is made

of oncAnanda the son of the great poet (mabkavi) Sambhu. I venture
to hope that Nos. 173 and 174 are two hitherto unknown works by
the poet Mankha here speaks of. In the Muktulatsatakam,
No. 173, the poet is styled simply Sambhu. But the colophon of the
Jtjendrakarnap , No. 174, adds the information that ho
was a native of Kashmir. The latter poem moreover is in the form
of an address to the poet's patron king Harsha. Harshadeva of
Kashmir died in 1101, a dato which it will be seen agrees with the
presence of a son of Sambhu at Alaiiikara's sabh.
In the Devstotram, No. 91, a copy
The
Devstotram of of wMch hag alrcad been obtained by
Yasaskara.
/
Buhler, an otherwise unknown poet,

Yasaskara, has extracted the alamkra sutras from a previous
work, and has illustrated them in verses composed in honour of
Devi. The sutras, which appear to be of considerable importance
for the history of the alamkara sastra, will be given in the extracts
at the end of this Report. From the opening words of Yasaskara
H4t 2*% sit
*( ^rf *1-<1:
' VHHil0! Il
^^^^lH^Mxl^^HIchiH^NiRi^^rt^lUsll^rtchK^n^
it will bo seen that they are taken from a work called Alamkraratnakara by one Sobhkaramitra, the son of sri-Traysvaramitra.
In the last verses of his book Yasaskara tells us he had gone to live
at the city on the hill Pradyumna, whence king Pravara went to tho
hill of Hari in bodily form (was translated to heaven), partly becauso
the place was on Pravara 's account sacred, partly on account of his
own ill-health.
The sanitarium or hill-station on the hill Pradyumna is mentioned
in the Rjtaraiigin :
^1^% TTrW sPfarT I
TT: TT^TTRT < ^^- II
11 '1 <v-(l ^ | ^^ tfirilH I
3Hig<fl ^^
ni., C15.
Bhler brought Mankha to light, and procured for Government a copy of his
epic, the whole of the last sarga in which, containing " an account altogether
unique in Sanskrit literature," will be found among the extracts at the end of
Bhlcr' s Report.
13
The Smbapachsika is full of the Saiva doctrine of the oneness

with the god he worships to which the true believer may attain :
and it may therefore perhaps be assumed that the ir-S dmba,
in whose mouth the verses are put by the commentator as spoken
by the god himself to make known his glory, is the name of a real
writer.
The new copy of the commentary on
^011 ^ BataW. epic, the Haravijaya, called
the Vishamapadoddyota, No. 229,
appears to differ from that obtained in Kashmir by Bhler in being
somewhat more complete. It has the first four verses of the first
sarga, and it ends, not in the middle of the forty-fifth sarga, but with
the seventieth verse of the forty-sixth. The existence of two copies
of this commentary ending at about the same part of the poem may
be a coincidence. Bat the suggestion may also be hazarded that
the explanation lies in the fact that RatnAkara did not complete his
poem, and thatAlaka, the author of the commentary,* was a contem
porary and pupil of the author, whoso work, unlike that of his master,
was not finished by another hand. Thnt the whole of the Haravijaya
is not by Ratniikara is expressly asserted, I may point out, in the
colophon to Biihler's copy of that work, where G an ap at i is given
as the name of the author of the sequel.
,
Ratnakaras
panchsik with
mentary o ri
_.,,,.
vakroktithe comVallabha-
No. 165 is a small book, hitherto I believe

unknown, by this same RatnAkara, with
& commentary by sr Vallabhadeva, who
describes himself as the son of the minister

(amtyavara) Ananda, and as the author of commentaries on the
Sisuplavadha and more than one other poem (iisupAlavadhdyanekakvyatkkartri). There was already in the Bombay Govern
ment Collection a copy of this Vallabhadova's commentary on the
isuplavadha : and a second copy was procured this year, No. 191.'
I have also procured his commentary on the Kumrasambhava, 36,
in the colophon to which he styles himself, or is styled, AnandadevA* "Tho Tik explains, as its title, Vishamapadoddyota, indicates, only par
ticularly difficult words and passages, its HS. begins with L. 5, and ends
in the middle of Sarga XLV. Its author is Alaka, son of Rfijfinaka Jayunaka."
Kashmir Report, p. 45. My copy of the Vishamapadoddyota does not give tho
author's name. But the pandit from whom I obtained the book knew that it
was the work of Alaka.
14
yanivallabhadeva. In the last line of his commentary to the present

work, which he there speaks of, not as the Vakroktipnchsik, but,
by a play on the author's name, as the Vakroktivarnanam Rtnain,
Vallabhadeva, styles his father, Anandadeva, the ' sun in the firma
ment of battle.'
'^' " ^^=" I
The Vakroktipnchsik itself is a collection of ' crooked sayings'
in the form of short dialogues between Siva and Prvat of the kind
with which the Mndrarkshasa opens. Examples will bo found in
the extracts at the end of this Report.
Bhler found in Kashmir a complete
of a work ^y Kvylamkra,
r
J
'
which a comparison with a fragment pre
viously obtained from Jesalmir, proved to
bo by Rudrata, the author of the " Sriiigratilaka, which has been
known for a long time, and which has been published by Professor
Stenzleras an Appendix totheMeghadta."* The Jesalmir fragment
(adhyyas 3 5) is accompanied by a commentary whoso author's
name Bhler gave as Svetmbara. Among the palm-leaf manuscripts
procured for Government in 1880 by the enterprising and intelligent
ageit for this search, Mr. Bhagvandas Kevaldas, is a second complete
copy of Rudrata' s Kvylamkra, with a commentary, also complete, by
Nami.-f No. 159 of the works included in the present Report is tho
same work as tho palm-leaf MS. But it has not previously been noticed
that the Nami of the palm-leaf MS . and the Svetmbara of the Jesal
mir fragment are one and the same person. In the colophons appen
ded to the varions adhyyas of the palm-leaf MS. Nami describes
himself, or is described, variously, as Svetabhikshunami (adhyya 1)
Svetmvaranami (adhyyas 2, 4 and 6), Namisdhu (adhyyas 7, 9,
14, 15), Sdhunami (adhyya 8), Panditanami (adhyya 13). The
colophons of the 3rd, 5th, 10th, 11th, and 12th adhyyas in that MS.
are incomplete. In my copy of the work, which is a Kashmir MS.
obtained at Jeypore, the author of the commentry is described as
follows :Namisdhu (adhyyas 1, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15), Sve
tmvaranami (adhyya 2), Svetmbarasrnami (adhyya 3), SrisvetmKttdrata'e KvyMaibkra
with tho commentary of
Nami.
"
* Kashmir Report, p. 67.

f Dr. Kielborn's Report, p. 34.
15
varasrnami (adhyya 5), Srsvetmbaranami (adhyya 6), Srnamisdhu (adhyya 9), Panditanamiadhu (adhyya 16).
The colophon to the fourth adhyAya has the abbreviated expression
" iti Svetmvarah chaturthah " which, or some such phrase, is
probably the origin of the mistake.
As the present MS. agrees with the Jesalmir fragment in the note
to the verse quoted by Bhler,* in which Rudrata tells us that ho
was also called Satnanda, and that he was the son of one IShalfa
Vmuka, it is clear that we have not here to deal with two com
mentators on the Kvylamkra.
The beginning of the present copy of Nairn's commentary agrees
with the extract from the palm-leaf MS., as given in Kielhorn's Report,
except that JtWlrJ is rightly written in the first line, 4$ [^y$] is found for ^* in the second line, and 'iffapT for 'ifr*TTr
in the fourth line of the introductory verse. As was to be expected
also, the 3Tf 'sftT^HtlTT : ?> which is absent from the palm-leaf
MS., is here prefixed.
The colophon at the end however differs materially from that
found in the palm-leaf MS., and I therefore give it in fullf :
'
~i'
I give the text of this verso and commentator's note from my MS.
flfaf & vPTri frrPj
l^m??rr^c ^ ^ ^r *% iftfrrf^%4Tirfrr [;]
t I note the variants in the palm-leaf MS. as given in tho extract found in
Kielhorn's Eeport, p. 35. tfif:, Kielhorn jpr:. ^ \4t<P, Kl^V
Both MSS. read qfT, apparently by mistake for fiferT. ?, - ^(.
*1<1|!(1^: q+KÎH4Wd : The MSS. diverge after the words 4Tf^C flfarf
the palm-leaf MS. continuing as follows :
11 fT4T fP&r ] ^\\ I
4^ M*la*tl^t<Mf24H+Pn.,-HI<J 17** II
^' iTRT - -^^ , II
^^5^?? 'iftirrf^TSTf^r: Il
''^ hptttt i^reitf^rT:

5^t 4TqfW^?T f^T fl|4H ^: Il 4 H
qrimH.-^ - <T [fr] fl^frf%W: Il
^^' gnfsrfr v il
*1^|: JIW? PTf*m II ^ Il
55'* *4ri^M *nT*M['ittiHlH II
^5:
? l% ^5 % ^r^Tpr *-- " \
TH ^ 4T4T: *tr*T * ^: Il
Below this the scribe gives a date Samvat 1190=a. d. 1134,
which wo may take to be the date of the manuscript from which ho
was copying.
It is evident from this colophon, if tho reading be accepted, that
the dato assigned to Rudrata by Bhler,*a. d. 1050-1100will
have to be revised. Nami, ' a bee that sacked honey from the lotus
feet of sr Sulibhadra, the ornament of the gachchha of the city of
Thrfipadra,' wrote his commentary when eleven hundred and
twenty-five years had passed from Vikrama (a. d. 10G9).f More
over, he wrote it for ' men of feeble intellect, ever on tho look-out for
* " In tho latter half of the eleventh century fulls lludrata, tho author of
tho Kvylarkra
Eudrata'a timo is fixod by tho fact that
Buyyaka, who wrote in tho beginning of the 12th century, quotes him."
Kashmir Report, p. 07. It will be soon that there is nothing inconsistent in
Biihlcr's argument with the revised date now sought to be assigned to our authort The colophon of tho palm-leaf MS. would appear to read shatsnptntisamyuktnih for our pachaviihsatisamyuktaih : but this must bo a mistake, as
shatsaptatisamyuktaih does not scan. I am not ablo to refer to the Poena MS.
as it has gone, with others, to Prof. Pischel to bo catalogued : but llumachandra
Silstri, who deciphered tho extracts from tho palm-leaf MSS., scums to think it
most probable that ho has himself made a mistake here.
17
primers and abstracts.'* That is to say, his commentary is a Shorter

Commentary, which would of itself imply a longer, or several longer,
predecessors. And Nami expressly tells us, in the second verse of his
introduction, that his work is a compilation in which lie has followed
strictly commentaries drawn np by 'mighty minds of old ':
rfnmt *5*3[4l*T<f>:<TSTg:T II ^ Il f
If we allow time for Rudrata's fame to be so firmly established

that scholars of rank were willing to make their contributions to the
science take the form of an examination of his work,J and allow
further for a series of commentaries which had so overlaid the text
that a fresh start was felt to be necessary, it seems probable that
Rudrata belonged to the middle of the tenth rather than to the
second half of the eleventh century.
Regret has often been expressed that in rhetoric, as in some other
branches of Sanskrit literature, thp fame of a comparatively late work,
which appeared, to the student of a day when tho science had ceased
to be progressive, to sum np all that could be said, has almost
completely overshadowed earlier works of genuine merit. Rudrata's
Kvylamkra is a case in point. It ought to be in the hands of
every student of alamkara ; and now that we have in our collection
two manuscripts, of which the one presents Nami's commentary as
written not more than a hundred years after the date of the composi
tion of the work ; and that before uswhich appears to me to contain
a more correct copy of the same commentary than the palm-leaf
manuscript itselfI hope shortly to bring out an edition. The
* Pandit Nami did not indulge in any of the platitudes about a busy age,
and the multiplicity of subjocts pressing on every one's attention, with which
the compilers of modern classics for lazy readers seek to lay the conscience of
their public.
t " My purpose is to compose something that may serve as a concise com
mentary to Rudrata's Kavylarkara, in accordanco with tho commentaries
composed by men of great mind of former days." It will not, of course, do
to lay any stress upon purva, which may mean simply ' former.'
J It has often been pointed out that wo have not here to allow for an interval
during which a book, eventually recognized as a masterpiece, may be supposed
to have been slowly struggling into notice. In ancient India, as everywhere
before the invention of printing, the author's fame as a sage or teaoher won
immediate acceptance for a book which was a mere adjunct to his living fame.
18
first adhyya of the text, which is devoted to a consideration of the

uses of the science and practise of poetrj, is given here as a sample
of the work : and I will add a few notes with regard to the contents
of the other adhyyas :
il4('m^4'g^f&rf^ TTrfw ( x
*1<*<|" 4|J -=Hula*HH fab
<*1*14 : fif 1| II ,
f% ^ H^lrtl-^lRi"! ":*! il
*^rtdi)rt5(|ch4+K: iTtf ^'Hrl+f^: <*|4 Il
*4I*-44*J-4 4dTlf% RT: 4WI II V II
<1il*rftd<i<*m4Jl'^f' le ^ 4iT%T II
T >*11 % *ft ,: II <* Il
4t *& ?[^ 3T* < Hl4^< \
S^miHh<.ui W*T Tffat ^ TTrftfrT II
||<1')11<{| ^11* II Il
9^5| AIH+IHHiHI 4rf |*< I
ft<fa<Hfa<i<^ftRK*H <** rf 3T>: Il < M
ant *mrf5f% tt% \* ^
3<yi ^ rft ^ \ il
=<** 4f*T ^' |1* I
' ? fW ^rt4c4rt4ri^ I ! II * H
<rftfrr gwfraf% Trg^rrîf^^wr ^sk:
rf^ra^Bgî *<< 5*<4 II ^3 II
*<!| ft | 4jfa4<HI+*l44luUIH3r: I
<*<4<*|0 wr^rfWv W4i&vnm:

<1*1<.^1 ^*1: ^)" I
% rt 1?^^<*' i
^RfcaiPr "Tfrf% ^r ft^rflr irctpreft *%: Vt
5^?^ *?*1*1 m f|4T > I
g^rr *?"*^|<4 ^rnrcft wm x$
HWI*fr fc4ft << TT% 1 tj I
IN THE BOMBT Cl KCl, E.
19
t4>IW><^>4l?ir f44<<rt *t<*rtrtinhflf I

<ft-4idWlt TO: ^ 4*&f- " \
^<1 JJrTT T )%*7
>T*f?r 4^ if57 STT^lfr l4$^ I
H4rt44rt 3| 5>T5^ 4%T <rl *4 1 iS il
srrfir w^w îm-fini RtSi+ 4t : "

It will be seen that in a nobler spirit than the writers who followed,
Rudrata recognises as objects of poetry only the fame of the poet
and the good of others. In the second adhyya, which treats of the
nature of poetry (Kvyalakshanam), the known dialects of India are
summed up thus
1*0*$1*11-11 ***^ ^ i
S8H jR*i4l |1?<: il

which alone shows I think that it is impossible to admit
that the word bhsh standing by itself can in writings of this age
mean Sanskrit* Soon after in discussing Vakrokti, Rudrata has
occasion to adduce his first example
f% hit m ufa - nfc* ffr

^rcjrrf TT Ufa 4)*:|*! Il
* F*rcr f*Tft?pr gfcm V*

Bhler has noted that the quotations illustrating the rules are
numerous, but that in no case has the source been given. It u
possible that they are of the same authorship as the rest of
the book. That this was the view of the writer of our MS. is
probable from the fact that rules and illustrations are numbered
Compare remarks in the second Appendix to this Report, p- 121. In
the 13th verse the ornaments depending on the sound are said to ba
il), Vakrokti; (2), Anuprsa; (8), Yamakam; (4), lesha; (5), Chitram, it
being noted that there is another slesha, of the sense, which is distinct from
that already mentioned.
20
OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OP SAN8KRIT M3S.
straight on. The commentator adds many illustrations : but gener

ally, so far as I have noticed, gives the source. The discussion of
vakrokti and anuprsa is completed in the second adhyya : and the
third is wholly taken up with the doctrine of yamaka. It may be
worth noting that both in the palm-leaf MS. and in that now being
described, the third is the first adhyya to which a separate name
is ascribed in the colophon. Both MSS. call it the yarnakdhyya.
The explanation is probably that here the discussion of one
Bubject and of one subject only is begun and ended within this
division of the book. The fourth adhyya is called the sleshadhyya
in the colophon of the palm-leaf MS., hut not in that of the other.
Both MSS. style the fifth, which treats of the alamkras depending
on the sound, the chitrdhyAya ; and the sixth adhyya is devoted to
faults in such ornaments. With the seventh begius that part of the
book which best repays perusal.
Alamkras depending on the sense are said, in a passage I give
below,* to fall under four great heads, vstavam, aupamvam,
atisaya, and slesha
The discussion of the first of these four kinds is completed in the
seventh adhyya, which in both MSS. is called the vstavyadhyya.t
This brings us to about the middle of the book.
The aupamydhyya (so in both MS.) is the eighth. The ninth
and tenth are called in both MSS. the atisaya and slesha adhyya
respectively. In the eleventh the faults incident to alamkras depen
dent on the sense are discussed (arthadoshdbyya in both). Then
follow four short chapters on the subject of nyakas and nyiks,
which might have to be omitted in any general course of college
instruction.
* ^^ ^rîfop^qHTq': fr: Il
W fr^RT ^- j ? f%4[: IK II
to PT'k^'TiHVnT ^HlTT^rf apqfFT ^ ?T^Tft , ftPrffT ^^ ?1? ^* jfffi^* ^ ^?
it *T 4<Krf<r ??R^r ^: Il . Il
$% Il \ Il
t Ystavdhyaya in the palm-leaf MS.
1 '
IN THE BOMBAY C1ECLE.
21
_, _,
, .,
The Kvyapraksa.
In the Introduction to his edition of

Sabandhu's Vsavadatt,* FitzEdward
Hall had occasion to refer to a work written in illustration of the
Kvyapraksa, and called the Kvyapraksanidarsanam. The author's
name, according to Hall, was Sitikantha, and the book was
"dedicated to Rjnaka Anandaka, some unknown princeling."
Bhler has pointed out that a copy of what is presumably the
same book, already acquired for the Bombay Government^ attri
butes the work to Anandaka, and makes no mention of Sitikantha.
Ko. 33 in the present collection is a third copy of this book, got
at Jeypore, an examination of which, and of other works bearing on
this the most famous of Indian books on rhetoric, which I procured
later, has suggested the following considerations. In my own
study of the Kvyapraksa for college purposes, I have always
been doubtful of the truth of the common theory that the book,
or the greater part of it, is the work of a single author. It may
be admitted that there is no inherent difficulty in the way of
the common doctrine in the fact that the writer of the com
ments on the rales refers to the writer of the rules in the third
person, if that stood alone. J But it has always seemed to me that,
though as a whole the commentary follows the text so closely that
both might conceivably have been written by the same hand, therejare
places, where a divergence of view, if reverently and skilfully
kept in the background, remains apparent. The most marked
instance perhaps occurs early in the book, where the attempt to make
out that the distinct precept that poetry may exist in the absence of
P. 16.
+ " I will add that the Government copy attributes the Kyapraki sanidarsana
to Anandaka, who was a Kashmirian, not to Sitikaiitha as Dr. Hall states. It
says : " Shadangasaptasrutimiteshn gateshu varsheshu kaleradarsi kuvyaprakso vidhivadvivritynandena sallakshananandanena rimadrujnakanvayatilafcena rjanaknandakena virachitam kvyapraksaiiidarsanam samaptam.
The date of the NiJarsana is therefore 1(K!5 A. D."Kashmir Report, p. 69.
1665 A. D. is the year in which Hall says his MS. of Sitikantha's work was
transcribed. For another way of taking this passage, see below, p. 24.
I The Kfivyaprakfisa begins with an invocation, on which the author of the
commentary has the note " granthrambhe vighnavightya samuchiteshtadevatm granthakrit parmrisati. " Before beginning his book, the maker of
the book, that he may avoid mishap, chooses an appropriate deity to whom to
offer up prayer."
22
alamkras really means that without alamkras there can be no poe

try, bat that these alamkras need not be always of a particular
kind, wears an extremely suspicious look of the process of accom
modation which is the nsual refuge of scholars who have broken
away from their teachers, but do not like to confess it, even to
themselves.*
Now the colophon of the text of the tenth and last nllsa of the
present copy of the Kvyapraksa runs thus : iti rmamt [mammatii] chryavirachite kvyaprake rjnaknandakrite kvyapmksadarsane 'paranmni arthlamkranidarsano nma dasama
ul(l)sah. This means "here ends the tenth nllsa, by name
arthlamkranidarsana, in the Kvyapraksa of Mammal, otherwise
known as the Kvyapraksadarsanam of Rjnaknanda." Unless
we are to assume a mistake, it is clear that Mammata's Kvyapraksa
and Rjnaknanda's Kvyapraksadarsanam are here spoken of as
one and the same book : and I believe that this contains the explana
tion of the state in which the book has come down to us. The
metrical rules are by one author : the running commentary is by
another.
Immediately after the colophon which I have ventured to explain
in this way, there comes the following passage, which I give here
wiA some corrections of my own, although I am not able to restore
entirely a somewhat corrupt text. The actual text, as it stands in my
manuscript, may be seen in the extracts at the end of this Report :
ityesha mrgo vidushm vibhinno
'pyabhinna ekah pratibhsate yat
na tad vichitram yad amutra samyag
vinirmit saghatanaiva hetuh.
The note on this is vidushm dhvanikritprabhritnm ya esba
margah svasvasiddhntas ttattadgranthagatam tena prithakpritha
gavasthitopi ekarpatay pratibhti tatra sarighatan nimittam |
* The passage is as follows :
fR^ffl' 41^l4f *IJ,Jll<Hri<$iffg4': SrrfEt " A poem consists of words and sense,
both faultless, and in addition possessing specific .excellencies." They need not
always have alamkras- That is; alamkras are usnal but not necessary con
comitants. On which the note is frPM^HrKIS 4**) 4 WtHift efl^cCf("0' * 5ST?if:. " By the worde " not always " he means that while
alamkras must always be present, a poem does not to be a poem if
there be no apparent alamkras."
IN THE BOMBAY CIKCLB.
23
rikshiptasya sukhvabodhya ekatra saiigrahanam y sanghatan

etadvasd ektmat pratibhst | etena cha mahmatnm prasaraaahetur eshgranthah | granthakritnena kathamapi asamptatvd
aparena cha pritTaseshatvd dvikandopi akandatay yad avabhsate
tatxa sangatanvaev hetuh | na hi sughatitasya sandhibandhah
kadchid lakshyate ityarthasakty dhvanyete yaduktam
kritah srmammatchryavaryaih parikarvadhih
prabandhah pritah sesho vidhylathasrin iti
anyenpi uktam
kvyapraksadasakopi nibandbakridbhym
dvbhym kritopi kritinm rasatattvalbhah
lokesti visrntam idam nitarm raslam
bandhaprakrarachitasya taro h phalam yat
samprnoyam kvyapraksagranthah
It is to be regretted that the text of the only MS. at my disposal
while writing is so corrapt here. But enough is clear to show,
firstly, that the commentator regarded the verse
ityesha mrgo vidushm vibhinnah, &c,
as an integral part of the work he had set himself to annotate : and,
secondly, that he explains it rightly as referring to a binding toge
ther of a book and its commentary together, that the doctrine taught
in both may be more easily apprehended. He is aware of and appa
rently does not reject the tradition which would explain the * joining*
of which the verse speaks as the mere mechanical attachment of a
sequel to a book left incomplete. But tbat tradition, which may be
true, but which, it is more probable, I think, rests solely on a mis
apprehension of this verse, he does not regard as the main purport of
the verse. In the commentator's judgment we have here to deal
with a book which contains the conclusions of two masters of the
art, kept apart (prithakprithag avasthita), but always so as to
form one book. The blending in the Kvyapraksa, of which the
second and later author here boasts, is like the mixing of the waters
of the rivers Rhone and Sone.
It has only to be added that the verse explained at such length here
is found in other copies of the Kvyapraksa than those in which
Sitikantha's, or Ananda's commentary is attached, though it is as a
rnle placed wrongly before the colophon. It follows that the 'joining'
24
OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OP SANSKRIT MSS.
of which the verse boasts is not the joining of the Kvyapraksa

as we know it the collection of metrical rules with a running
commentary, both supposed to be by Mammatato the present
commentary, but of a process that has taken place within the work
itself. The colophon accordingly, on which I am laying stress,
refers, as was already probable from the use of the phrase " arthlamkradarsano ama dasama ullsah" to the work itself, and not to
the present commentary, the authorship of which is therefore here
attributed neither to Mammata nor to Rjnaka. With this preface I
submit that the verso ityesha mrgo vidushm, &c, is the triumphant
but somewhat uneasy boast of a later disciple who hopes to find that
he has bound his comment so closely to the work of his master that
the world will be content to treat for the future the two as one work.*
Confirmation of this view with regard to the authorship of the
Kvyapraksa, as we now have that book, I am glad to be able to
add I have found since in a copy of the text of the work obtained
very recently. No. 31 is a manuscript, or a copy of a manuscript,
written, as is shown by the rubric at the end, in 1375 A. D.f In the
colophon of this MS., which contains, it must be remembered, no
additional commentary, but merely the Kvyapraksa as it is now
printed, the work is expressly assigned to sr bhatta Rjnaka and
Mammata : iti sribhattarjnakamammatayoh kritih kvyapraksanmakah kvyasvarpadoshagunlamkramrpanagranthah samptah .
In view of the fact that a MS. of date 1375 A. d. attributes part
authorship in the Kvyapraksa to one Rjnaka, it becomes pro
bable that the colophonj to the copy of the work under examination
already in the Government collection really refers to the same tradi
tion, and should be translated " when four thousand and seventy-six
Kamalkara's interpretation of this verse cannot be accepted. The com
mentary within the Kfivyapraksa makes no secret of the divergence of the
author's views from those of earlier writers. The following is Kamalkara's
note :
ftfrfa fZ4\ tflft^PHrfo Pmf 4rf: arfrf^r ZTFHJT^rT: qF^ftPTTCTrT
t See extracts at the end of this Report. Sasi stands for 1 ; sivanayana
for3; abdhi for 4, and vetfivaha fori. That is Samvat 1431 = a. d. 1375.
I am indebted for the key to those chronograms to Mr. Ramchandra Shastri.
J Quoted above, note on page 21.
25
years of the Kali age had gone [that is, 1665 A. D.], the Kvya
praksa [that is, the joint work of Rjnaka and Mammata] was
illustrated by Ananda the son of Sallakshana, who has expounded
it in the fit way. Here ends the Kvyapraksanidarsanam of
Rjnaknandaka [that is the book alreadyreferred to] the ornament
in the race of rimad Rjnaka." Ido not press this translation:
but it must be noticed that Biihler's apparent identification of the
Ananda, son of Sallakshana, of the former clause, with the Anandaka
of the latter is not entirely borne out by the phraseology. The
question as to whether the commentary on the joint work was
written by Sitikantha, as Dr. Hall appears to have found stated,
or by Ananda as stated in the colophon to the MS. referred to by
Dr. Bhler, as also the question of the date of that commentary,
are points on which my MS. throws no very certain light. Bat the
fact that my copy does not contain the attribution to Ananda, when
taken together with the circumstance that Hall's copy of the book
was transcribed in A. d. 1665,* the very year of the composition of
the work according to Biihler's colophon, weakens the authority of
that colophon.f
My third copy of the Kvyapraksa, No. 32, contains a hitherto
unnoticed commentary by srSarasvattrtha the spiritual
name, rname in baptism, as we might say, of one Narahari. In tho
introductory verses this writer traces his lineage back to Rmosvara, of
the Vatsa gotra, in the country of the Andhras. The son of Rames vara
was Narasimhabhatta, whose son was Mallintha. Mallintha had
two sons, the elder Nryana, and the younger Narahari, the author
of this commentary on the Kvyapraksa. The date of Narahari's
birth is given in the following verse :
" Did any heart not beat for joy when Narahari was born in
the year which has for its sign Savasugrahahasta Brahma."
Putting the eight vasavas, the nine grahas, the two hands, and the
* Hall loc. cit. We can hardly supposo that Hall had in his hands tho
author's copy.
t Before finally quitting this copy of tho Kavya Prakia, No. 33, I ought to
note that it agrees with the other Kashmrian MSS., in reading srlharhAdibndlnm dhanam. The other MSS. I refor to have the incorrect
reading dhvakdinam.
26
OPERATIONS IN SEABCH OF SANSKRIT MSS.
one Brahma, together, and reading backwards, we get Samvat

1298 = a. D. 1242.
R^r4 * : ^ rt|rt4W t
There came a day when the child whose birth had been hailed with
such joy learned that all joy was sorrow. With his heart panting
after the living God he foreswore the world ; and thenceforward was
known to men fitly* as Sarasvattrtha. He wrote his commentary
in KAsiA fourth copy of the Kvyapraksa, obtained after the conclusion
of the year under report, contains a commentary also, I believe, now
noticed for the first time, by /timase n a. It is fair to say that
on the question of the composition of the book Bhmasena speaks
with no uncertain sound. His note introducing the comment on the
first krik is atha srmammatchryah svakritakvyarpastrrthrambharachitam svasvarpaschakam magalam svakyam anusmarannha granthrambhe, &c.
Bhimasena's commentary, which he calls Sukhodadhi, however
dates only from Samvat 1779=a. d. 1723. I have been able to do
no more than glance at the book : but I have noticed that it contains
the account of the relationship between Maramala and Kaiyata,f the
autthor of the Pradpa, which has not hitherto, so far as I know, been
vouched for by any manusciipt authority. According to the story as
Bhimasena has it, Mammata was an incarnation of Sarasvat in the
person of a son of one Jaiyata. Though the goddess of speech in the
form of a man, he did not disdain to study like an ordinary mortal in
ivapur, where he composed his Shityastrm, by name Kvyapraksa, as also a commentary by which he made the obscure Kvyapraks intelligible. Kaiyata and Uvata were his younger brothers, and
were taught by him. I will place the passage among the extracts at
the end of this Report.
An examination of a copy of the work known as the Kvyapradpa,
already acquired for Government, has disclosed nothing inconsistent
* The reference hidden in here can I think only be gnessed at. The
most probable explanation is that author, when he left the world, had
taken a good deal of self-conceit with him, and means that Temple, as we
might say, of Sarasvat, was no unsuitable name for a man of his learning.
t Bhler had heard it asserted by Indian pandits that Kaiyata was a brother
of Mammata.Kashmir Report, p. 22.
27
with the views set forth above. The Kvyapradpa is usually de

scribed as a commentary on Kvyaprakia, but it professes only to
be a commentary to the kriks, or metrical rules in the book that
now passes under that name. The book pens as follows :
*fH*3*H : : %511*1-|
T*T KHdHft : *(-4dW II

?5 5TI*41*ifTf ^rfr>Trfft <T3ftv|c3H|MHHd<li ! ri M i <* 4H -
It will be seen that Govinda, who calls himself the first of the
children whom his mother Sonodevi bore to Kesava, and the dearly
loved younger brother of the poet Ruchikara, proposes to illustrate
Kvyatattvam, a word which, if the passage stood alone, would
most naturally be taken to bo the name of the book to be com
mented on, or a compound formed of the name of that book, and the
word tattvam in the sense of essence. Govinda begins with an in
dependent explanation of the first krik. In the seqnel there are
frequent references to the commentary now embedded with the (ext
of the kriks ; but these references are as much in the way of
hostile criticism as of explanatory comment.
And it is in this light that I am disposed to explain the boast with
which Govinda closes his work, namely, that in the Kvyapradpa,
"a lamp to Kvyam," the world has a work that throws light even on
the Kvyapraksa, "the illuminator of Kvyatn." Both works are
attempts to explain a collection of kriks, which, under the simple
title of Kvyam, had become the text-book in Alariikra.
It deserves to be noticed in this connection that all copies of the
Kvyapraksa which I have yet seen have, at the close of the tenth
nllsa, before the colophon ascribing the work to Mammnta, the words
iti Rvyalakshanam samptam* here ends the description of poetry.
These words can only refer to the whole book, and not to the tenth
ullea alone, and they may fairly be regarded as containing the lost
* In the K&vyapradpasamprnam Kavyalakehanam
giren in next paragraph.
See the extract
28
title of the original book. I will add here that while at Oodeypore
I heard of a third commentary on the kriks, called, like the
Kuvyapraksa, and the Kvyapradpa, by a name, Kvyalat., which
does not weaken the inference I have drawn.
The end of the Kvyapradpa has an interest of its own, as
showing that the poet Ruchikara, of whom Govinda, his younger
brother by another mother, speaks so lovingly, was no other than
r-Harsha;* and, secondly, as affording an interesting illustration
of that collaboration between two authors which was one of the
most striking literary features of the age.
"^ ^ I
^^^ % mfSRT : \ II
4Mf Tfr ^^ I
ffJT^ff ; : [] II
frfr^rrff [] ^ srfhrfwi & i
^ **-<*< - $ f^f?r II *
: - II
".
.
.
do not require separate notice. Here ends the
Kvyalakshanam. May good lack go with it. He has passed into
the sky, Sri-Harsha, who was first in all virtues, in age alone taking
a second place, full of wisdom, lovelier than Cupid's self.f and
I am left lamenting. Who now will go over and correct this book ?
That barden fate has cast upon the learned. Let the good study with
contented mind this Lamp of Poetry, which sheds light even on the
Illuminator of Poetry. I have made two dpiks for daughters, and
twopradlpas for sons ; may they [in default of children] secure the
everlasting happiness of Govinda."
I have closely examined a copy of the
. , . . * . . . .
. .
a si / V rit ti, No. 34, got at Jeypore,
in the hopo of finding something that should throw further light
The Kfiiki Vritti.
* See noto on p. 11.

t Ihe meaning of nishthupratSshthusraya is not very clear to me.
29
on the authorship of that work, with the following result. No.

34 is a Jain MS., which reads at the end of the seventh adhyya,
after the word ajaganat : the verse
ssr4vr^raT%ff%I^T ^ ' II , Il
followed by the colophon
*fMbTPT7r4T*iftTfwri 3RRl+l4r | TH4TWJT*f4 ^3^; - Il

The end of the eighth adhyya in this MS. is unfortunately in a
bad condition. It contains this verse, in which, by means of a series
of pans, the Ksik is compared to the holy city of Ki. Then
follows the verse :
1*<11 * 4R8<Kirsr+i4*idMt.
fitz- *: ^ II *
The words immediately following are the bare iti ksikym ashtamasydhyyasya, &"!., followed by something which is unfortunately
undecipherable. Going now back I note that these verses occur
neither at the end of tho fifth nor at that of the sixth adhyyas ;
and that the colophons of theso adhyyas do not give any author's
name. In the sub-titles to the first, second, and third pdas of the
sixth adhyya howaver the book is consistently described as tho
Vmanaksik. Throughout the fifth adhyya there is no mention
either of Vmana or of Jayditya. Throughout the first four adhy
yas the book is nowhere described otherwise than simply as the
Ksik vritti without any reference to an author. The first of the
verses I have quoted occurs at the end of each adhyya, but it is
only at the end of the first book that it stands in what appears to be
its proper place, that is, immediately before the colophon. where it is appended after the colophon.
Pandit Bfila Sfistr in his excellent edition of the Kaiku puts tho two
verses ishtyupasankhyanavati and vyakranasya ariram at the beginning of
the book and adds the verse
Vrittau bhushye tath dhntunmaparAyandishu
viprakir asya tantrasya kriyate srasamgrahah
The verses do not stand in that position either in the birch bark MS. Bliler
procured from Kashmir (Report, p. cxsxvii.) or in my Jain copy. I may
note here that the last named 18. begins risndhuprsvanathaya namali.
Then follows the singlo verse vrittau, 4-c, and then the atha sabdnusasanam.
For three additional verses found in tho Kashmir copy see Bhler,
80
In a Brahminical MS. of the last five adhyyas of the work which

I have acquired this year, the colophons of the seventh and eighth
adhyyas, agreeing in this with the Jeypore MS., expressly attribute
the Ksik to (paramopdhyya) Vmana. The colophon to the
sixth adhyya is simply iti shashtodhyyah, but, in agreement
here also with the former example, the book is referred to in the
sub-titles of this adhyya as the (sri) Vmanaksik. I found no
reference to Vmana in other parts of this MS. It will have been
noticed that neither MS. makes any reference to Jayditya. So
far as these MSS. go, then, they establish Vmana's authorship
of the seventh and eighth adhyyas, and possibly of the sixth or
part of the sixth. If the death of the first author led to the inter
ruption of the work, we might expect to find that Vmana had to
begin with an unfinished adhyya : and the circumstance that he
wrote or remodelled part of the sixth adhyya, but did not choose to
claim the credit of the whole of that part of the work, may account
for the contradictory evidence that adhyya presents in both MSS.
A consideration on which I should be disposed to lay great stress is
the way in which the verse ishtyupsankbynavat, which does not
appear at all in the Brahminical MS., is presented in the Jain
copy. In the seventh and eighth adhyyas it stands just before
the attribution to Vmana : and may reasonably be supposed to be
Vmana's own boast with regard to the excellence of his own part of
the work. The verse is absent from the fifth and sixth adhyyas.
And the fact that the scribe of this particular copy inserted the verse
in the first four adhyyas placing it in its proper position, before the
colophon only in the case of the first adhyya does'not show more
than that the verse and its application to the Ksik was well
known.
Not the least interesting among the
The Subhsliituvali of <,
,
n Vallabhadeva.
books I saw at Jeypore was a Subhashi t vali attributed to one rmad
Vallabhadeva. The simple colophon (samptoyam srmadvallabhadevavirachit srsubhshitvaliriti subham) gives ns no infor
mation which might enable us to identify the compiler with one of
the Vallabhadevas already known to us.* I will only hazard the con* I have not been able to ascertain whether this Snbhashitvali is the same
as that obtained by Bhler in Kashmir and attributed by him to rrara. The
prosent Subhshitvali contains, as Bhler notes his does, verses by HemA.
chrya.
81
jecture that, as such compilations are more frequently the work of

critics and admirers than of poets, it is not impossible that we have
here a work by the Vallabhadeva, whose boast it was that he had
composed commentaries to the Sisuplavadha and " to more than one
other poem."* The collection includes verses attributed to a Vallabha
deva, who may or may not be the same as the compiler, f The book
is arranged on the same principle as the Srngadharapaddhati : and
in the great majority of cases the author's name is given. J I give
the titles of the ninety-three sections under which the poems are
gronped :
NamaskArapaddhati 1.
srvachas 2.
Vakroktayah 3.
Kavikvyaprasans 4.
Snjanavarnanam 5.
Durjanavarnanam 6.
Kadaryh 7.
Udrh 8.
(athnyapadesh tatrdan)
Suryenduvarnanam 9.
* See page 14.

The former is the more natural supposition, as Vallabhadeva would hardly
have referred to another writer of the same name without adding a distinguish
ing mark either to the one or the other. So argadhara includes some of his
own verses in his paddhati. Besides Vallabhadeva there are quotations from
a poet who is styled Utpreksh-Vallabhadeva, whom Aufrecht in his analysis
of the Srngadhara-paddhati, to be referred to immediately, distinguishes
from Vallabhadeva, also quoted in that book. Aufrecht gives the following
account of the Bhikshtanakvya of Utpreksh-Vallabha :" The subject of this
poem is a favourite one. Siva goes to Svarga to alms, and the Apsaras
try to make him fall in love with them. The poet uses this plot in order to
describe in detail, with more or less success, each act and word of a woman
in love, as these are laid down in the treatises in the Kama sastra. He states
his purpose in the first verse of the second chapter :
' iftrfr 34 HJ4-- Il

" I sing the various deeds of the women of Indra's city, when Siva came
there to beg and caused them an unlocked joy, but wounded their hearts sore
with love." The Apsaras owe their festival " out of season " to the moon on
Siva's head. Aufrecht thinks Utpreksh-Vallabha's name was ivadsa ; and
informs us that the only poets he quotes are Klidsa and Buna.
J Where the author'e name is not known, the verse or verses are ascribed to
kasypi, or kayorapi, or keshsmapi, as the case may be : and Dkshintyasya
kasypi, " one of the poets of the south," is not an uncommon heading.
32
OPERATIONS IN SEAECH OF SANSKRIT MSB.
(atha prnniah tatrdati)

Siriihh 10.
Gajh .
Uehtrh 12.
(atha khagh tatra)
Mayrnh 13.
Hamsih 14.
Kokilh 15.
Kkh 16.
Bhramariih 17.
Ktamanayah 18.
Vrikshah 19.
Megh 20.
Samudrh 21.
Manayah 22.
Sankhh 23.
Padmh 24.
Manah 25.
Saiikirnam 26.
(atha sriiigravarnanam daa
vipralambhah tatrdau)
Dayitagamanam 27.
Virhinyavasth 28.
Sakhprasnh 29.
Virhinpralph 30.
Sakhvchyat 31.
Dtpreshanam 32.
Virahinm pralph 33.
Dtyuktayh 34.
Sakhprasnh 35.
Upahsh 36.
Stryavalokanara 37Strvarnanam 38.
Kesh 39.
Laltam 40.
Bhrvau 41.
Chakshushi 42.
Ns 43.
Adharam 44.
,
Mukham 45.
Kanthah 46.
Bh 47.
Stanau 48.
Madhyabhgah 49.
Romarjih 50.
Jaghanamandalam 51.
r 52.
Pda 53.
Mnah 54.
Anunayah 55.
Uktipratyukt 56.
(atha sambhogasririg rah tatra
ritushat kavarnanam tatrdau)
Vasantah 57.
Grshmah 58.
Prvrit 59.
Sarat 60.
Hemantah 61.
Sisirah 62.
Pushpochchaya 63.
Jalakelih 64.
Astamayah 65.
Abhisrikh 66.
Chandrodayah 67.
Pnam 68.
Chtavah 69.
Priyavishaye chtavah 70.
Suratrambhah 71.
Suratakelih 72.
Vipartasuratam 73.
Prabhtavarnanam 74.
Sankrnasringrah 75.
Vrh 76.
Hsyam 77.
Jtih 78.
Rajavishaye chtavah 79.
Ntih 80.
(atha vairgyam tatrdau)
Dharmah 81.
Slam 82.
t TBS BOMBAY Cl BELE.
Kalb 83.
Karmapaddhatih 84.
Daivani 85.
pat 86.
Sev 87.
Trishn 88.
33
Anityat 89.
VishayopahSsh 90.
Paridevanh 91.
Manorathh 92.
Sankrnam 93.
Bhagavadvarnanam 94.
I bave compiled and put in alphabetical order the following list of

the authors quoted by Vallabhadeva. The list is a nominal one,
and ander each name I have added the instances where it occurs
with varying honorific prefixes, without attempting here to decide
how far a real distinction is meant to be inferred. In the great
majority of such cases, doubtless, the compiler understood himself to
be dealing with one and the same poet. But I doubt whether, how
far that applies to cases where, as in this book, a quotation from
Baka is immediately followed by one from rvaka. Then, again,
we cannot say whether the compiler knew that Vysadsa was
another name of Ksheruendra, and Vidhydipat of Ratnkara. He
quotes the four, perhaps ware that they were only two, perhaps
thinking them to be two, perhaps knowing them to be two. So
again utpreksh-Vallabha, that is V&llabha fond of utprekshs,*
may be intended to distinguish that Vallabhadeva from another poet
of the same name ; but we cannot, in the absence of other testimony,
be certain that it is so.
bhgavata-chintadeva.
Adbhutaphulla.
bhatta-Aparjita.
.
Amaraka.
Amarnka.
bhgavata-Amritadatta.
Amritavardhana.
Ambaka.
Anika.
bhatta-Arka.
rjputra A.
Argata.
Archaka.
Archetadeva.
Arjunadeva.
Arthavarman.
Arbhaka.
Avadhta.
bhatta-Avalokita.
bhgavata-Avintadeva.
bhadanta-Asvaghosha.
Asthibhaiga.
chryabhatta.
* Compare npam-Klidea, a title given to Klidflsa on account of hii

fondness for that figure, not a name intended to distinguish one Klidsa from
another.
34
bhatta- A di tyaka.
bhadanta-Adityadatta.
bhatfa-Ananda.
rj naka- A nandaka.
Anandavardhana.
Antivarman.
bhadnta- rogya.
Aryadeva.
Aryabbata.
Indubhatta.
bbadanta-Indurja.
Indnlekha.
tathagata-Indrasimha.
anadeva.
Ucbyamnnanda.
Utprekshvallabha.
tipdhyya-Udaya.
bbatta-Udbhafca.
Upamanya.
rjita.
Anrva.
bhatta-Kapardin.
Kamalyndha.
r-K.
bhadanta-Kambalaka. (MS. v.)
Karpiira.
Kayyata.
bhatta-KarnAta.
rdhya-Karpra.
Kalaka.
Kalasa.
Kalasaka.
bhatta-Kallata.
iri-k.
Kalhana.
sr-Kalynadatta.
Kaviratnaka.
Klidsa.
Kioraka.
Kunddev.
Knmradsa.
Kumrabhatta.
Kusumadeva.
Krishnamisra.
Kshemendra.
bhadanta-Kshemav riddbi.
Gangdatta.
Gagdhara.
Gandagopla.
GopdityaGovindarja.
bhatta-G.
bhaffa-Govindasvmin.
Gaurik.
Chandaka.
Chandragopin.
Chamachamikaratna.
Charpatntha.
Chta.
Chsaka.
Chhtra.
Clika.
Chksa.
Ch ilbhafctrik.
Cbilbbattnika.
bhatta-Chlinaka.
Jayadeva.
pandita-Jagaddhara.
Jayamdbavaka.
Jayavardhana.
bbgavata-sr-J.
Jayditya.
sr-Jaypda.
Jalhana.
Jvaka.
Jvanga.
Jeuduka.
pandita-J onaka.
sr-Jonarja (MS. in one place
Rjorja.)
1 A \ adan ta - Juanavarman .
Takshaka.
Trivikrama.
bhatta-T.
bhgavata-T.
Dagdhamarana .
Darvata.
Darsanya.
sri-Dmara.
Dmodaragnpta.
Dahoraka.
Dpaka.
Durgamana.
Durvahaka.
Devagnpfca.
Devata.
divira-Devditya.
Dorlahkadarsanya.
Dohara.
Dyutidhara.
Dharmakrti.
npdhyya-Dharavarman .
Dharmadatta.
divira-Dh.
Dharmadetha.
Dhranga.
Dhairyanmitra.
Dhrdhara.
Narasimha.
Narendra.
Nagnajifc.
NagnchArya.
bhatfca-Nyaka.
bhatta-Nryana.
Nidrdaridra.
Naishadhakart.
Nryanasvmin.
Padmagnpta.
pandita-PAnaka.
pandita-Pjaka.
Pnini.
rjaputra-Parpati.
Pundraka.
Punya.
Pulina.
bhatta-Pritbvdhara.
Praksadatfc.
Priyamukhya.
Praksavarsha.
bha tfca- Pradyu mna .
bhatta-Prabhkara.
Phalgahastin.
Prabhkar;tnanda.
pandita-Prasastaka.
bhafcta-Paribhta.
Pravarasena.
sri-Baka.
Bandhu (MS. v.)
bhatta-Ballata.
B,ma. (bhatt-Vna.)
bhatta-sr-Bilhana.
sr-Bhandaka.
Bhattaevamin.
Bhatti.
BhartrisrasvataBhartrihari.
Bhavabhti.
hav nnandana.
Bhshanadeva.
Buddha (MS. v.)
Bodhaka (MS. v.)
Bodhisattva.
Bhskaraseua.
Bhattaka.
Bhallata.
Bhaschu.
sr-Bhanusnena.
Bhravi.
Bhsa.
jyotishaka-bhatta-Bhskara.
35
a>
OPERATIONS SIAKCH Py SANSKKTT .
Bhma.
Bhaunda.
r-Bhogivarmao.
Bhumidhara.
Brabmayasahsvmln.
Manibbadra.
Madrka.
pandita-Mapddhakaw
Madhusudhane.
Manoratha.
Mab ciarraabya..
pandita-MakhaMakbaka.
Magalavatsa.
Malaya.
r-Mammatk
sr-Mayra.
Mah endva.
Mgha.
MAtangadivkara.
pracbanda-Mdbav.
Mnktpd.
bhatta-Mfthon daka.
r-M.
bbat ta-Muk tikosak
Muktikalasa.
rr-Mtrigupta,
Mriml.
Mnrri.
Mrkha.
Mentha.
Menthak.
Mori ft.
Yasahsvmim.
Ranapati.
Ratiuitra
Btieena.
Ratnamisra,
Batnkara.
bhadauta-Bavignpl*.
pandita-RAjaka.
RAjakulabhatta .
Ara-RAjnaka.
RjAnakAbldak,
RjasekbaraRAma.
Rmilaka.
bhadanta-Riranaga.
Rsdrs.
kapila-Radcafca.
bhafa-Rudraa.
Rairapaka.
Laksbmana.
LalitAnuragaLlAcbandra.
Llsuka.
Lattaka.
Lothaka (svarasnu).
Lothaka (Jayamdbavresnm).
Lothitaka.
Lulxlbaka.
Luttaka.
rijna(ta)-Lanlafca.
Vajravarman.
ar-Vajryudha.
Yararuchi .
Varhamihira.
sr-Vardhana.
Varman.
Varshadev.
Vallata.
Vallabhadeva.
atpreksh-V.
bhatta-V.
Vhinpati.
Vkpati (sri-HarshacTeYmayi).
VAmana.
Vmana-svmin.
bbagavad-Valmikimnai*
Yandhu.
Varbamihira.
fc--V.
Vasunga.
bhatta-Vasudeva.
Vairpaka.
Yayyahsa.
Vikatanitamb.
Vidhkaravarmaii.
Vidydhara.
Vikramditya.
Viksbatimadhava.
er-Vibhakaravarman.
r-sri-Vijayapla.
Visbnusarman.
Vigraharja.
Vijayavarman.
Vijayamdhava, corrected from
Vikshalimdhava.
r-sr-Vijayapla.
Vijjak.
bhadanta-Vranga.
bhagavata-Vinka.
Vifcavrinta.
"Vidydhara (Lnllasnu).
Vidydhipati.
iri-Vibhkara.
Vibhtivala.Viskhadeva.
Visrnti varman.
Vrabhatta.
Vjaka.
Vriddhi.
Vrishnigupta.
Vysa.
Vysadsa (Rjnaka).
Sakavriddhi.
Sakachella.
Sakavarman.
akradeva.
Sankaragana.
Baiiktaka.
Saknka.
S hadanta.
skandaskra-Saiikara.
Sa&jra.
Sakba.
bhayavata-S.
Sankbaka.
Sambhu.
Sarvata.
Sarepba.
Sasivardhana.
Satyadeva.
Skalya.
S tala.
Srvabhanma.
SAsvata.
sr-Sivasvmin.
Srayarman.
Sm.
Sdraka.
bhatta-Srdatta
pandita-Srvaka.
Siddhrtha.
luka.
Sirtadhara.
Stkraratna.
Sukhavishnu.
Subandhu.
bhatta-Sanandana.
Snbhadr.
Surabhichla.
rntadhara.
er-rajana(ka) Suka.
bhadanta-Sra.
bhgvata-er-r
Somadeva.
yndilya.
Haragana.
37
38
Haragupta.
sr-.
Harigana.
r-Harshadeva.
Harichandra.
Haladhara.
bhatta-Haribhta.
Hastipaka.
Haribhatta.
Hemchrya.
Harshadatta.
Early opportunity will be taken to offer a separate paper on Vallabhadeva's Subhshitvali. In the meantime a few gleanings may
be acceptable. The first quotation from the poet Vallabhadeva,
which occurs in the Kavikvyaprasans, contains, I think, a dexterous
allusion, quite in the manner of Indian writers, to the fact that the
poet cited is the compiler of this anthology :
fa =*' ff^: =| Il
In the same section I find the following couplet given as from
Buna :
WIT <I^WW4rK II
This is a quotation from the introductory verses prefixed to BAna's
Harshacharita : but it is singular that none of the MSS. which
were at my disposal when drawing up the account of the Harsha
charita, which will be found in the Introduction to my edition of
Bna's Kdambar, contained the second verse.
The other quotations from ma of verses neither to be found in
his extant works nor in the Srgadhara Paddhati are numerous :
and one at least I have noticed as probably taken from the lost
geographical work to which Bhler found a reference in nandavardhana's* Dhvanyloka :
*
' Anandavardhana calls Bna sthftiiYsvarkkyajanapadavarnannkart, the
author of the description of the country called a Sthsnvsvara, i.e., Thnesar,
and indicates thereby that we hare to look out for yet another composition,
probably a geographical one, of the famous friend of Harshavardhana-Silditya."Kashmir Beport, p. Co.
39
The verse
is an imitation of a verse in the Vikramorvas,* and may be added

to the examples I have given, to my edition of Kdambar, in the
Introduction of Klidsa's influence upon Buna.
So long back as lSGO Aufrecht called attention to the fact that
Srngadhara's Paddhati* contains two verses attributed to Pnini.
t^sc ^ ^fHixq-r ^ JCi ^ II

VikramorvaS. Act IV.
In the magazine of the German Oriental Society, Vol.xiv., p. 581. Aufrecht's
full analysis of the Srngadhara Paddhati, with translations of selected vorses,
appeared in 1873 in the xxviith vol. of the same journal. A reprint of that paper,
with the translation in English, would be very welcome to students in India.
I give the substance of the earlier note. The translations, which do not pretend
to be litoral, aro my own. I wish I could have put them into as graceful verso
as my honoured teacher has done in the Paper from which I am quoting. " In
Sargadhara's Paddhati there are two verses with the simple wording, Pan in eh,
by Pnini. The first is found in the chapter ohandrodayavarnanam, the
second in varshsamayasvabhvkhynam. We do not as yet know of moro
than one Pnini. Lot us listen to what tho sage " bent double over grammar
and foresworn to all worldly joy," has to say and to sing :
f^rirut*
frTfrrT "
" On came tho flushed Moon : Night fixed her quivering eyes the stars
upon him, and was so taken with the sight, that sho noticed not how her wholo
mantle of darkness had slipped to her feet."
T'frf?? W444S<-4f Airar
xJrTftrfaTSFrif^Tfftr ([ ^: Il
" See how the clouds roam over the sky, darting their lightnings in search of the
sun, who, after sending langour through the nights, drying up all the streams,
burning the face of tho earth, and filling tho deepest forest glades with heat,
has goneno man knows where."
40
OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OF SANSKRIT MS.
From the same scholar's very valuable analysis of the contents of

that paddhati, published later, it appears that the two are the only
verses for which that august authorship is claimed by Sriigadhara.
In the present anthology I have found the following additional
examples of Pnini :
fTc ffsr ^? & ^f| ^ ft3-4l II

"The East marks the glow that comes over the Sun and the West
as they meet, and her own face darkens : lives there the woman who
is free from jealousy ?"
d*4fH4W nHIAÂ*! 441*1*1 <1$^1. H

" See, he has reached his setting, whose glory was beyond the reach
of censure. Oh, man, that hast put far from thee the fear of death, to
thee he calls, ' Everything that is born must die, as I am dying.' "*
From what poem of Pnini's are those verses taken? Porhaps from the
Jambavativijaya, a work of which, besides one other corrupt line, I have so far
came only upon the following verse :
payai) prishantibliih sprishtvfi
vfinti vth sanaih sanaih
Rayamukuta quotos this half sloko in order to show that, besides prishat, ' a
drop of water,' there is a form prishanti, which has led some authorities to
construe the word prishantiviiiduprishtah, in Am. I., 2, 3, 6 as a dvandva of
three members. Of the two verses given above, the one is worthy of Kalidasa,
who has made use of it : to the other that poet would perhaps have lent a
little moro Attic salt (rasa)."
* One touch of nature makes the whole world kin. Listen to the echoes of
these words of Pnini which rose from the England of three hundred years ago :
" Behold the sun, that seemed but now
Enthroned over head,
Beginneth to decline below
The globe whereon we tread :
And he, whom now we look upon
With comfort and delight,
Will quite depart from us anon
And leave us to the night.
Thus day by day doth nature take
The life that nature gave ;
Thus are our bodies every day
Declining to the grave ;
41
*<*1<1 |44 T% ? %tf 4fi>*4\ I

f| fflFT HI^HM * Pj4lrtl+'i4M*l<l Il
" The sun has gone : and straightway the lake shuts its lotus eyes.
It is well done : for eyes that see the whole world see nothing if they
see not the loved one."
" The very cloud in heaven peers through the dark night with its
lightning eyes into her face ; and straightway utters loud lament,
as having, with the showers of rain, let fall the Moon."
It is to be noticed that with one exception all those verses are in
the upajti metre, which we have already seen, Kshemendra distin
guishes as the metre which Pnini loved, and in which he was at his
best. We may assume I think that we are dealing here with verses
which in the first half of the eleventh century, at a time when
grammar was being eagerly studied, was recognised as the work of
one ' Pnini.'J
Into the considerations raised by the discovery of the attribution
of sucha considerableand in part so beautiful body of verse to the
great grammarian I will not now enter farther than to say that, on the
supposition that we have not to do with two Puninis, the verses lend
very strong support to those who would place the sutras and all the
literature that has clustered round them, at a date much later than
that ordinarily accepted. It is impossible to admit a gap of a thousand
years between these verses, and the verses of a precisely similar cha
racter in the two collections, which we can assign to dates ranging
from 600 to 1000 A. D. It is possible of course that there are two
Pninis. But there is no evidence for such a supposition. And it is
hard to understand why the fact, if it were a fact, should have been
Thus from us all our pleasures fly

Wlieruou wo sot our heart,
And when the night of death draws uigh,
Thus will thoy all depart."
* MS. :.
t MS. .
In my MS. of the Suvrittatilaka of Kshemendra one of the verses is nscribed,

in a marginal note, to Pnini, whose PtlavijayaiB said to be well known.
F
42
OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OF SAN8KEIT MSS.
so early lost sight of. For I do not think it conceivable that either
SariigAdhara or Vallabhadeva, and much less Kshemendra, in nsing
the namo Pa ni ni sans phrase could have had in their own mind any
other than the author of the Ashtdyaj.
The following verses are ascribed to kp a t i, who is here called
the son of sr Harshadcva. The fourth stanza occurs in Bhartrihari's SrigArasataka :
% Tg M Alfil g^T **l*ftrir l
TÎTfPiTTTfTT: *< % 3TfT AIM<ft II

'f4||<{U$dd*lr4 fa*H>HH*<l AIMI<:4Tt
*fllH4<4-=IW TTT TWfT ?TT TTTr I
* 1-'*'^ it
^ % JjHAMH '^
^ < Mt gfft i
% ^tt Htfi
' TFT4T <**
411 ^|*1^ I
|^? TfffrfTT fa**fi4 PT* TTFTT >** R TTT
"Women, as well as men, would appear to have reached distinction
in letters at the courts of the princes of tho Indian medival times
who were patrons of tho arts and sciences. Wc have in this book
[the riigadharapaddhati] the names of nine poetessesNAgammA,
Phalguhastin, MadlasA, MorikA, Lakshm, Vikatanitamb, VijjakA
SlbhattArik,* SarasvatkutumbaduhitTi. Another, MarulA, is men
tioned in the following verse by Dhanadeva, 7, 9. (Compare Hall, In
troduction to Vasavadatta, p. 21.)
tffar fa**IWH!rtl4lfi*rT: TiT^T T7 3g 5: fe# I
* T^ -4IR-I " ^ : : T TST: II
Chilbhattrika in the Subhshitvali ia merely an incorrect way of writing.
IN TFE BOMBAY CIRCLE.
1 Women too were able to make verses ; witness, Ola, Vijj,

Mrul, and Morik: but praise belongs only to the man whounderstands all learning, can conquer all opponents, and speak about
everything.' "* A reference to the list of authors quoted by Vallabhadeva will show that this enumeration may now be largely
extended.
Returning now to the incidents of my stay at Jeypore, I may note
that while waiting for arrangement to be made to enable me to
visit the library, I took advantage of an invitation extended to me
to visit and examine the Maharaja's Native Sanskrit College. The
European scholar is familiar now with description of visits to such
places : but I could not help wishing that it were possible to place
some of the eminent men, who in mind and spirit are no strangers
to a country they have never seen, in the midst of the scene before
me. The cloisters surrounding an inner court-yard of a temple,
that reserves only one side of its quadrangle for purposes of
worship, were filled with a crowd of scholars of all ages. With
some difficultyfor masters and pupils were everywhere squatted
indiscriminately upon the ground an Asanam of cushions was spread
for me, and for my companion, who, had sho been Sarasvati herself,
could not have been treated with more respect. Children, who look
ed as if they might but yesterday have learned to speak, recited
to us glibly the first elements of that marvellous system- of technical
grammar, which some of them will be studying still when the
present generation of men has passed away. Older pupils and their
masters joined in discussing difficult passages, selected from various
kavyas, with a warmth and vohemenco that left short space for
their visitor to interpose remarks which, to do tho disputants
justice, were uniformly received with scholarly courtesy. The
last pupil who came up to exhibit his proficiency to the mlechchha
Sanskritist was an old blind man, who, I was informed, and
readily believed, could have gone on repeating the Mahbhshya
as long as there was any one to listen to him, and who, if I may
judge from his happy demeanour, is evidently as content with the
shadow he pursues as any of us all.
* Aufrecht's paper referred to. Tho author has tho note, Vijjfl, a corrup
tion of Vidy, is an abbreviation for Vijjak. Manila is the reading of three of
my manuscripts, A, B, and O, and there is no occasion to change it iutollrut.
A, 0, E read dit um for visvam.
44
It was a strange scene ; and none the less strange, that it did not
require to shut one's eyes to imagine that timo had rolled back a
thousand years. In all that met the eye or ear there was nothing to
tell of the present, or of the culture and religion which make up
what we fondly deem the only civilisation worthy of the name. And
in no other way than that exhibited to us was grammar taught and
learned in India in tho days of the Buddhist pilgrim I-tsing.*
My chief contribution to the discussion came at the close when I
gave my friends what was probably their first lesson in comparative
philology. It was listened to with urbanity ; and the possible
identity of father with pitar and of two with dva was even cheerfully
admitted. But I failed to shake the conviction that if these things
were so, they only confirmed the doctrine that all language outside
of Bharatavarsha is a ' falling away ' from Sanskrit.
During the same interval we paid, by the courtesy of the MahArS ja,
a visit to Amber, the old capital of Jeypore. In a remote room
of tho deserted palaco we were startled to come upon preparations,
all but complete, for the daily sacrifice still performed there. The
day was on tho point of noon : the sacrificer and the knife were
ready : and in a corner of the room a girl was encircling with
her arms the little goat that had till then been her playmate, but was
now to be torn from her, and put to death, because the upper powers
require some such satisfaction for the sins of the people of Jeypore.
* I-tsing, a Buddhist, wont to India to loara Sanskrit, in ordor to bo able to
translate some of tho sacrod books of his own religion, which wero originally
written in Sanskrit, into Chinse. He left China in 671, arrived at Tmralipti
in India in 673, and went to tho groat collego and monastery of Nalanda,
where ho studied Sanskrit. Ho returned to China in 695, and died in 70S ....
I-tsing then gives a short account of the system of education. Children, he
says, learn the forty-nino letters and the 10,000 compound letters when they
are six years old, and generally finish them in half a year. This corresponds
to about 300 verses, each sloka of thirty-two syllables. It was originally
tanght by Mahesvara. At eight years, children begin to learn the grammar
of Pnini, and know it after about eight months. It consists of 1,000 lokas,
called Stras.
Then follows the list of roots (dhtu) and the threo appendicos (khila), con
sisting again of 1,000 elokns. Boys begin tho three appondices when thoy are
ten years old, and finish thom in throe years. When they have reached the
age of fifteen, they bogin to study a commontary on the grammar (Sutra), and
spend five years in learning it.Max Miillor. "India: What can It teach us ?"
p. 210.
THE BOMBAT dRCLE.
45
We turned and fled the scene, thinking in our hearts that a sight like
this might possibly open the eyes even of certain commentators.
On the fourth day of my stay at Jeypore, I had the honour of an
interview with H. II. the Maharaja, who was good enough to issue
orders to the extremely orthodox Brahmins in whose charge the
royal collection of books is, to grant me free admittance and inspec
tion of any book I might call for. I spent the next three days in
going as carefully as possible over the library with the aid of the
very rough MS. catalogue ; but in the short time at my disposal I
was unable to do more for the purposes of the search than make a
hurried note of books, to be added to our lists of desiderata, or of which
it seemed desirable to arrange for copies. In this as in other parts of
my work in Jeypore, I was much assisted by my friends, Pandit Durgil
Prasda, and others, whose co-operation and interest I desire heartily
to acknowledge. That it was not feasible to do more on this first visit
to Jeysingh'e famous library was, I felt, the less to be regretted
that Bhler had already made as careful an examination as was
consistent with the time at his disposal. It is much to be wished
that the enlightened Jeypore Durbar would employ for a sufficient
time a competent scholar to make a catalogue raisonne of a collec
tion which there can be no reasonable doubt still hides much from
the learned world. There are pandits in Jeypore who could do
this work admirably, on the many excellent European models now
available, if means could be found to satisfy the vested interests
of the hereditary keepers of the books.
On enquiring after the copies of the selected works ordered for
Dr. Bhler, I was informed that they had been duly made andstowed
away no one knew where. As I had no list of the books in question,
and could find no one who would confess to any very precise know
ledge of the matter, I was fain to be content with the promise kindly
made by His Highness's intelligent Private Secretary, Baboo Keshub
Chunder Sen, that the books should be looked out. I can only here
express the hope that my report next year will contain an account of
these books, and of the copies ordered on the present occasion at
my own request.
I left Jeypore on the 14th of October for Ajmir. From Ajmir an
easy excursion was made to Pushkar, a place whose chief claim to
distinction now is by some considered to spring out of the annual
46
horse-fair held there, but which is also widely known as one of the
most sacred places in India, and the only one of all her sacred places
which boasts a temple raised in honour of the Creator Brahma.
Pushkar is built on three sides of a lake, whose waters fringe the steps
of countless temples that are mutely eloquent of the reverence and
faith of a great people in days gone by. The suburbs are studded
with the palaces of princes, who, in more modern times, have thought
to compound for years of self-indulgence by visits to the holy place,
or have come here to die. Overlooking all is the peak to which
Brahma's angry spouse retired, when here, with the help of her rival,
he made the world. Through paths ankle deep in dust, and followed
by crowds of Brahmin beggars, as ignorant as they were shame
less and importunate, we visited one deserted shrine after another,
asking ourselves how long the best minds of India will be content
to leave the religion of the common people a prey to the obscene
creatures who fatten on it as a means of livelihood. To the Hindu
who respects his country's past, and who hopes in her future, I can
conceive of no sight more distressing than the present condition of
the Holy City, Pushkar.
My hurried visit was, of course, one of mere curiosity ; but I obtain
ed subsequently some valuable Brahminical MSS. from Pushkar,
through Mr. Bhagvandas Kevaldas, whom I directed to visit the
place, on our return from Oodeypore. The most of these have been,
at his own request, handed over to my colleague, Mr. Bhandarkar.
A night's journey on the Eastern Rajputana Railway brought
ns at four in the morning of the next day to the Chittore railway
station, which for some reason not very apparent, is a good three
miles from Chittore itself. The station for Oodeypore, to which we
were bound, is a few miles further on, but the opportunity was
not to be resisted of visiting the far-famed city, set upon a hill,
which thrice defied the Imperial armies of the Great MogulOf the graces that remain to Chittore, something may perhaps be
said in a note.* A solitary Brahmin, unable to read the torn leaves
* " We were advancing over a perfectly level plain ; and the hill of Chittore
was still a dark mass lying along our right. Our first glimpse of the
fortress was a sight never to bo forgotten. Chittore is to the plain along
whose skirts we wore moving what Abu is to the western desert. It stands out
in the same isolated way from the more compact mass of hills to the farther
47
of the commonplace stuti, which he carries about with him as a

charm, is all, so far as I could find, that is left of the learning
and culture of the city whero the scribe Jallana, the son of
Siradeva, wrote centuries ago on palm-leaf, the copy of Nami's
east. But the summit of Chittore is a low tablo land. Wo wero between the
hill and the now rising sun : and the first object brought out of darkness by
his rays was the magnificent tower of victory raised by Khumba Eana to com
memorate a victory over a Muhammadan invader four hund red years ago.
Next we saw tho diadem of towersthere is no other expression for itthat
still, in unbroken line, encircles tho brow of Chittore. As one gazes upwards it
seems impossible to believe that such a Une of dfonce was ever stormed. As
a matter of fact, I do not believe that it ever was. The fierce Alla-u-din and
his host lay patiently below, the monarch managing tho affairs of his vast
dominions from his permanent camp in partibus, much as a vaster dominion ig
managed now from a Bhooting-box in the Himalayas, while his soldiers ravagod
the plains far and wide. From timo to time a Eujput chief, weary of inactions
and as careless of tho general weal as King James at Floddon, would throw open
the gate entrusted to his charge, and sally down into the plain to fall an easy
prey to his disciplined foe. The day came when this was done for the last time,
and when the heart of a man in tho feeblo body of the Rajput widowed quoon,
who rode side by side with her boy at the head of tho sally, availed not to secura
the usual safe rotreat for the remnant of the defoatod host.
The invaders entered at tho open door. Far to tho south, Padmininame
never to bo forgotten by Rajput heartheard tho despairing cry which told
that the end had come, and straightway, followed by every wife, widow, and
maiden in the fortress, sought and found
" That place of shelter
Where tho focman cannot como,"
and the victor stained his triumph by the indiscriminate butchery of all that
remained of the chivalry of Mewar.
We could only devote that day and tho next to Chittore, and wero glad to find
that there would be no difficulty about climbing tho hill that afternoon. The
Ilakam or governor of the placo courteously sent a horso and a chair,
and we started about four o'clock. There is a lovoly bit of river scenery
which lies betwoon the bungalow and tho hill ; next the modern town of
Chittore, which lies at tho foot of tho hill, and presents no feature of
great interest, has to be traversed ; and then an easy ascent, which takes
about an hour, brings you to the summit. I might say much of the
monuments of antiquity that are crowded together thoro ; but I do not know
that any one of these is more impressive than tho general aspect of the place
iteelf. Chittore is a city of tho dead. But it is that in this uniquo sense, that the
dead of Chittore have not yielded up their title deeds either to tho kindly hands
of restoring natnre or to tho generations that have followed them. Every
house is empty ; but every house stands ready to be occupied if only tho
rightful owners would come back. 1 cannot analyse the impression modo ou
48
commentary on Rudrata, which from Chittore was carried to Pathan,

and now lies in the library of the English College at Poona.*
We left Chittore on the evening of the following day for Nimbahera
where, through the kindness of Colonel Enan Smith, c.B , theur Acting
Resident at Oodeypore, we found a dak waiting to convey us to the
famous capital of Me war. At the close of a fatiguing day's journey,t
us by this weird ; but as wo sat on the torrace of Padmini's palace in the
middle of the lake, at tho southern end of the hill, with no sound in our oars
but
" Silent nature's breathing life,"
and saw the moonlight fall on those empty houses, that have continued through
so many generations their futile protest against the oblivion that lies in wait
for all things human, those men and women seemed tho realities of the place,
and wo the passing shadows. " From a Paper read before the Bombay Dialectic
Society.
Seo before p. 15. Chittore is a corruption of Chitrakta.
+ For the first fifty miles tho way lies over a broad plain, which presents
no feature of special interest. At the end of this plain tho traveller finds
himself approaching a gorge in hills that havo for tho last hour or two seemed
entiroly to shut out the western horizon, which I can compare to nothing so
well as Scott's pioture of the Entrance to tho Valley of the Shadow of Death.
In placo of the grim spectre which there affrights the pilgrim, the gate of
Mowar has over it only the clear blue sky. For defenco it trusted to two
long lines of walls, which begin far up in tho opposing hills, and meet in the
portal proper. The whole forms a most impressive and imposing sight ; and
some sense of the great natural advantages of tho position choson for their
new capital by the Maharanas of Mowar, when it becamo apparent that
Chittoro was no longer tenable, is best had when it is seen that the only
entrance to tho wido plain, in tho middle of which stands Oodeyporo, is by similar
mountain passes. It must bo remembered that the whole of the surrounding
country was in the hands of wild hill tribes, who had their own quarrels with
tho sovereigns of Mowar, but who always helped them against a foreign foe.
As wo drove slowly up the steep ascent, and passod through tho portal, I under
stood, as I never had before, why it is that the Court of Oodeyporo is the only
Rajput Court, whoso reigning monarch never attended a levee of the Great
Mogul, and whose women were never forced to stoop to an allianoe with the
enemy of their faith.
On tho other side of the gates tho plain lay before us, but tho city of Oodey
pore, still sevon miles or so in front, was not for somo time visible. When
at last we did see the city, we saw a sight for which all our anticipations had
failod to prepare us.
.
.
.
.1 will attempt a bare
sketch only of tho scene from the upper terrace of the Residency. A line of
low-lying hills, neither so near nor so high as to interfere with the imposing
THE BOMBAY CIRCLE.
49
wo were received with much cordiality by an officer, to whose active

sympathy and great influence I desire to acknowledge the results
accomplished at Oodeypore as almost entirely due. I was glad to
find that the Agents of the search, Mr. Bhagvandas Kevaldas and
Sir. Ramchandra Shastri, who had been directed to join me here from
Alviedabad, had arrived some days previously; and next morning
I begun my work in Oodeypore by an examination of the works
which had already been offered to them for purchase.
altitude of the palace buildings forms t ho back ground. The whole of the centro
of the picture is occupied by the majestic pilo of tho palace of the Maharanas.
so massive in its proportions, so pure and delicate in its colours and decorations,
so high in air, that poet or painter might be forgiven who should take it for
the embodiment in marble of the apocalypatic "vision of tho Holy City, New
Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a brido adorned
for her husband. The town is seen climbing up to tho palace, and gathering
all about it : and far away on every side the eye rests with quiet satisfaction
on the hills that lie round Oodeypore.
....
One
chief glory of the place forms no part of this fair scene. It was said
a moment ago that the hills behind tho palace aro neither so near nor
so high as to interfere with tho commanding effect of tho position of
tho palaco itself. Our first afternoon's drive showed us that the palace,
which on this side is the last in a lino of buildings climbing slowly up
from the level of the plain, on the other descends sheer into a lake,
whose surpassing loveliness no words can convey to theso who have not
been privileged to see it. For us, who have seen it, it is a possession
for ever. More extensive than the Abu lake, it differs from that, which is
fully its equal in simple beauty, in tho variety of effect, if I may so speak
of which it can boast. In many a distant and retired nook it repeats tho
effect of supreme repose, and perfect natural beauty, which distinguishes its
Abu rival. Where it washes the palace walls and the gates of tho city it
presents with theso tho most charming specimen of that intermingling of
shadow and substance on which poets love to dwell
" Within the surface of Time's fleeting river
Its wrinkled image lies, as then it lay
Immovably unquiet, and for ever
It trembles, but it cannot pass away."
In the centre of tho lake stand those dreams in marble, the water palaces
With which the taste and munificence of the monarchs of Mewar have
crowned tho islands that aro there. On one of these palaces Englishmen, so
long as England is England, will never fail to gaze with an emotion that owes
nothing to its loveliness, groat as that loveliness is. It was hero that during
the .Mutiny a company of men, women and children, gathered from far anil wide,
found an asylum at tho hands of tho late Maharaua. To guard against any
50
I may here say at once that the number of desirable books offered
then and subsequently to me at Oodeypore was greatly in excess of
the funds at my disposal ; and I should have no difficulty in procur
ing, on a second visit, with the consent of Government, for the use of
scholars or learned institutions either here or at home, other copies
of any of the books actually selected. It has not been possible to
make a thorough examination of all the books bought ; and I can
only offer here a few remarks, chiefly by way of illustration of the
passages selected for extract.
Tho Chatuhsai-anaprakiriiakam of Virabhadra with
This important find, No. 260, settles, I

think, the question of the authorship of a
,
, .
,,
T .
a commentary.
book in great repute among the Jam com

munity, besides raising some interesting
points with regard to the authorship of others among their religious
books now unhappily anonymous. The last gth of the Chatuhsaranaprakirnakam is
Another reading substitutes *ffa fr *ffa- On this the commen

tary, which is a very extensive one, has a note which may be con
cisely translated as follows :
" my soul, study this work morning, noon, and night ; it will be a
very Greatheart to you to slay the enemy, which is spiritual indif
ference ; in the end it will bring you prosperity " (bhadrantam).
The words vra bhaddam and tam the commentator goes on to say
may be taken differently, vra and bhadra being construed as two
vocatives, " stout and blessed one," the effect of which is to incite the
fanatical outburst of hate in his own city the 3Iahara.ua removed to tho island
itself every boat on tho lake ; and through all the period of suspenso he kept
the charge entrusted to him as the apple of liis eye. For her services on that
occasionto use the official phrase I cannot doubt that Mewar received
ample material reward. But over and above that such a deed surely deserves
to be held in grateful remembrance ; and in future cpaestions arising between
that State and us it may sometimes, lot us hope, bo cast into the wavering
scale.
N 134 CIRCLE.
soul to fresh study of the sacred word. With the reading jita,
the whole word must be taken as an adjective qualifying Vrabhadra.
In oither case it is intended to be intimated that the work of which
this is the last gthu is the composition of Vrabhadra, who was one
of the 14,000 ssdhns tanght by MahAvra himself, the author's name
being samusagarbham, hid in a compound word. And we may
learn from this, according to the commentator, that each of the
sdhus attached to the various Jinas wrote a prakrnakam, little as
they themselves needed any such aids.
This manuscript was written in Samvat 1645 = a.d. 1589.
The existence of a commentary on
TT
,
, , ,
.
Hemachandra s Anekarthasamgraha, attributed in the opening lines to Hema, j -,mmselt,
.
, ,has ,been known tor
some
Chandra
time ; and my shastri informs me that Dr. Bhler, who procured a
copy in Kashmir,* was disposed to attribute the composition of the
commentary, not to Hemachandra himself, but to some unknown pupil
of his. My copy of the book, No. 234, shows that Dr. Biihler's
inference from internal evidence was justified. The common theory
on the subject is of course founded on the first verse
Mahendrasuri'a commontary on Uemachandra's Ane.
karthasamgraha, callod Ane.
kArthakairavAkarakaumud.
4"$% 1*i4^*iJ+<.ii+<*i'IHii
in which the speaker appears plainly to say that he is about to com
pose a commentary on his own Anekarthasamgraha. This ascrip
tion is continued in the colophon itychryhemachandrasrivirachitym anekrthkairavAkarakatimudtyabhidliAuAyA m anekrthasamgrabatikym anekarthasesho 'vyayakndah samAptah. But the words
that follow set the matter in its true light. I give here the first three
verses, which seem to me to be fragrant still of the love and rever
ence first breathed into them :
3*ft%ITfifr64or 4f|4-*uUiRull I
4fHtf%ifr ift <mm 4fafdi II
* I hare not been able to ascertain whether this copy contains the verses to
which I am calling attention. In Dr. Miller's list the Anekfirthakairavakaumud is ascribed to Hemachandra; but in the report, which was evidently
printed after the List, it is correctly ascribed to a " pupil o Hcmachaudra,"
p. 76.
>2
" Srmad Mahendrasri, tho faithful pupil of sr Hemasri, in

scribes on this commentary his master's name : "
" My lord Hemachandra was a store of right knowledge ; and his

virtues knew no bounds ; how should such as I be able to explain
his book."
tiWr*lT4' fp^T ft i^r *8^5^ Il

" Yet I will venture, wonder not at that ; he still is here, and I but
say after him what he teaches me."*
In the beginning of his commentary
No 232' the Bhayaharastotra of Manatunga, Jinaprabha intimates that it is
not his intention to give the vidymantras,
which I take to mean magical formula) for acquiring knowledge,
that have been extracted from the work by his predecessors.
BhtyaZrfZ oT natunga by Jinaprabha.
In the lines at the end the date is given in the following chrono
gram :
that is, in Samvat 1365=a.d. 1309. Jinaprabha was tho pupil of

sr-Jinasiiiihasri, and he wrote in the city Sketa, that is Onde.
The Ja-atsundaryogamala of pandita r-Hari"a'
The present copy of this work, No. 266,

is only a collection of scattered leaves ; but
I have heard of a complete copy, which
I hope to secure in the course of this year. Pandita srl-Harishena

wrote-in Samvat 1582, Ska 1449=a.d. 152 j ; and his book appears to
have been an attempt to reconstruct out of the writings of physicians
of his own and of past times a chapter of a lost encylopoedift, called
* Ho being dead yet spcaketh. Heb, xi. 4.
IN BOMBAY CIBCLE.
53
the Yoniprbhrita, of which he speaks in the most enthusiastic terms.

In one of the leaves I have found what looks like the colophon of the
original book : iti srmahgrantham yoniprbhritam srpanhasravaanmunivirachitam, according to which the author would be one srPanha.
The name of the author of the SamThe Samyaktvasaptatiku yaktvasaptatik, No. 351, was unknown
with Sanghatiluktichurvu's
. ,
, .
commentary.
* *ne commentator, who reters to him

as kaschit purvchrya, a certain old
teacher. In the introductory verses mention is made of a guru
Gunasekhara, and of the commentator's own spiritual teacher Jinaprabha, with regard to whom, we are told, that he taught Shah
Muhammad in Delhi, and that in consequence the ' six views' and
his own glory spread everywhere.
r Sanghatilakasuri belonged to the Rudrapallyagachha. There
is much of interest in the praiasti given at the end of the book.
Beginning with the rise of the Chandragachchha, like the
Moon, out of the ocean of Mahvra's teaching, it gives as the first
in the line of teachers sr-Varddhamna. To him succeeded Jinesvara. Jinesvara's pupil was Abhayadevasri, who is celebrated
here as the one suri who ' manifested' or brought to light com
mentaries on the nine angas, and also the statue of Stambhana
Pi'irsvantha.* He was succeeded by J in a valla bh a. Jinavalla1 >ha's pupil was ,7 i n a se h a r a, whom .ir - P a dm a o han fir a
followed. Then in order came r-Fij ay endu, 'a second'
A hh a y a d e v a sr i, the founder of the ludrapallyagachchha,
Devahhadr a,
sri-Prabhunandasri.
Prabbnandasri
had two pupils, sr-Chandrasri, and Fi m a l asa i i s r i ,
( Vimalachaudra). They wero followed by one Gunasekhara,
of whom, it is said, that he overthrew all rival pandits, even as far as
Kashmir. His pupil was the author of our book.
He composed his commentary at the request of ' a favourite pupil'
r -D ev endr amunisvar a, who stood next in rank to S m a* "Abhayadva, laghugurubhr&tar of Jinachanclra,was the son of Dhana
a sreshthin at Dhflrii, and Dhanadfir, and was originally called Abhayaknm/lra.
By excessive self-torment he became leprous, his hand9 fell off, but he was
healed by a miracle. By the Jayatilntyanastotra he called forth an image of
l'rva, near Stambhanaka. He wrote commentaries on nine angas and died at
Kappadavanijagrima in Gnrjaradesa."From Klatt's paper. See note, p. 50.
54
t il ak denary a* in the year from Vikrama 1422 (dvi 2,

nayana 3, ambodhi 4, kshapkrit 1) = a. d. 1366. Tho work was
finished at Saras vatapatannam in the Devali of that yenr. Y asuhh alai e, the younger brother of S alas a, assisted the
author, and wrote for him the first copy.f
The
Prkritaprabodha
by
,.
,
'
. AT
onn .
N ar hand r a sur , No. 300, is a
commentary, hitherto I think unknown,
on the eighth adhyaya of Hemachandra's
great grammatical work. The author was a pupil of M ala dh r i,
and wrote in Samvat 1645=a. d. 1589.
commentary, by
Narachandrasri on Hemachandra's Prakrit gram-
Shortly after my arrival at Oodeypore, I had the first of several

interviews with which . H. the Mahrna hononred me. This
liberal-minded prince showed the greatest interest in my commission ;
and, by his orders, I had free access to the royal library during the
whole period of my stay in the city, at such hours and for such
time as was convenient to me. S'urther, on its being represented to
tho Mahrna, through my good friend, Kavirj Shymaldas,JMember
of Council, that it was impossible for me to examine thoroughly during
my stay at Oodeypore the books I had selected most likely to
repay closer investigation, orders were issued to permit me to take
away on loan all books I might want. I desire hero to tender to
Tl. H. the Mahrna my most hearty thanks for a concession almost,
I venture to think, unique ; and also to the Prime Minister, PunnilaU
das, for the facilities estended to me.
Thus favoured I was able with the assistance of my agents to
examine more or less closely every book in tho collection ; and I
brought away with mo from Oodeypore some thirty books selected as
the most noteworthy, and a complete catalogue, admirably drawn
up nnder the direction of my friend, the Court Poet The results of
my examination of these I must keep for a separate paper ; but I will
place at the end of this Report selected extracts from which scholars
rifrlB^r^nff^C^ may also be a bahuvrihi.
t See note on p. 62.
X Kavirfij Shy/imaldas, who is an excellent Sanskrit scholar, is preparing a
history of Mewnr, which cannot fail to throw much light on a subject, our
knowledge of which, rather than the materials for such knowledge, is sorely
deficient. I am glad that I havo been ablo to lend him several important
MSS. for his purpose from this year's collection.
55
will be able to form an opinion with regard to the value of the collec
tion. I shall be happy to undertake to procure for scholars, with the
consent of H. H. the Mahitrna, which I doubt not will be cheerfully
given, copies of any of these books.
Oodeypore during the time of my visit was in what we should
call a state of great spiritual activity. The Mahrna and the bulk
of his people were celebrating the primooval rites of the Dusserah
as Tod saw them,* and as the spectator of a thousand years ago
may have seen them. Opposite the little group of English, who
watched the great procession of the worshippers of the Sun go past,
the reformer, Dynnanda Sarasvat, mounted on an elephant, and
surrounded by a little crowd of believers, was there to see honours
almost regal paid to the high priest of the famous shrine of Eklinga, whose constant occupation at all other times is to wash, dress,
feed, and worship a hideous black stone,f but who, for this rite,
leaves the holy place and comes into the town. The Digatnbara
Jains in their turn, who are very numerous in Oodeypore, had been
fluttered by the arrival in their city from Edur of a Bhattchrya,
whose descent by " spiritual succession and the laying on of hands"
set him in their opinion high above all other powers, spiritual and
temporal, in Oodeypore.
I regret that circumstances prevented me from having an interview
with the Brahminical reformer : though, as Professor Max Mller may
be interested to hear, I was indebted to him for the loan of a volume
of the editio princeps of the llig Veda, to which I had occasion to
refer. But I saw Kanakakrtti, the Jain teacher, in his mandira, or
cathedral, more than once ; and obtained a great deal of information
from him. Kanakrtti worthily maintains the traditions of Jain
learning. He is the owner at Edur, his chief seat, of a library of
Digambara books, numbering according to his own account no less
than 10,000 volumes, which he has promised to throw open to me if
I can make it convenient to visit that remote town. Among the books
brought by the Bhattchrya with him to Oodeypore on the occasion
of his present visit, I was highly gratified to come at once upon a poem
called the Y ai astil am, by S omad ev a, which I had been on
* Seo the first volume of Tod's "Annals and Antiquities of Kajasthan,"
p. 582.
t 1 visited the shrine of Eklinga, and was a witness of this extraordinary
exhibition.
5G
the look-out for ever since I heard from some Digambara friends in
Jeypore that I would find that, unlike the SvetAmbara book of tho
same name, it was an historical work. Kanakakrtti was embarassed
by the crowd of adherents who, unable to follow our conversation,
made up for that by the zeal with which they watched our move
ments : and I was able only to carry away with me a memorandum to
the effect that the work, which was written in Sariivat 88] =a.d. 825, is
an account of the deeds of Yasodhara, the eldest son of Arikear in the
Chalukya dynasty. Through the efforts of Col. Euan Smith and by
tho kind interposition of the Oodeypore Durbar, the book has since
been copied for me. I hope to have it soon in my hands.
It ivas very difficult to leave Oodoypore, but my short vacation
was rapidly drawing to a close, and I was anxious, before returning
to Bombay, to make a personal effort in the way of securing the
catalogue of tho BhandAr attached to the temple of Sntinth, at
Carabay, which tho officers of the search have been endeavouring to
obtain ever since Dr. Biihler's visit in 1879. On the 27th of
October, accordingly, we tore ourselves away from the magic of the
place, and the kindness of friends, and after a journey by Nimbahera
and Ajmir, lasting over three days and two nights, we left the Bom
bay and Barodaline at the village of Anand, where we found that the
Collector, Mr. Grant, had most considerately left his camp for us,
and had arranged with the Cambay Durbar for our transport to
Cambay. We broke the journey, as I should recom mend everyone
to do, at Borsad, and wero much interested in what wo saw, under
Mr. Gillespie's guidance, of the small Christian settlement there.
Cambay, once in the direct highway of commerce between
Eastern Asia and Europe, now a forlorn town which tho very sea
seems eager to desert, was reached early on the morning of the
1st November ; and I was gratified to learn from the Dewan, Mr.
Shamrao N. Laud, who had been already busying himself on behalf
of the search, that he had every -eason to believe that in the course
of a day or two I should be allowed to visit the library; and that per
mission would be given to draw up the long-desired catalogue. At
his suggestion, and with much assistance from him, for which, as
for his benevolent exertions on behalf of the search, I desire cordially
to thank him, we spent the interval in visiting the sights of
Cambay. A detailed description would be out of place hero ; but
the attention of hunters after arclucological treasures may perhaps
IN THE CIRCLE.
57
be called to the rich harvest that awaits research in the old

town, about five miles from the present Cambay. The present town
is obviously only the last of a series of attempts to keep pace -with
the ever-retreating sea ; and I feel certain that a few handfuls of
sandy dust alone, in the older town, conceal many fragments of
antiquity similar to the magnificent marble statue -which some
strange chance has raised above ground, and which has such a weird
effect on the visitor, who comes upon it, as we did, unexpectedly,
after a sharp turn in a dirty lane between mud cottages.
The promised access was duly given ; and I spent several days full of
idtereet in turning over with my own hands manuscripts of the
authentic antiquity which these Cambay MSS. can boast. The
books are kept in a dark underground vault, on stepping out of the
light into which you can see nothing that in the least suggests the
real character of the place. As the eye becomes accustomed to the
darkness, a hole in the wall is seen, which is the entrance into the
smaller and darker vault where the books are kept. We gathered
below the one window which from above lets light into this strange
place, and the keeper of the books grudgingly handed out one after
another for our inspection.
The system according to which the pages of palm-leaf MSS. are
numbered has been described by Pandit Bhgvnll Indraji in the
Indian Antiquary, Vol. VI., p. 42* In the Cambay MSS. it may
deserve note that on the first, second, and third pages, for which the
Pandit assigns, in the case of Jain MSS., the ordinary numeral figures,
I found universally the marks ?, f^tT, and sff respectively.f Whereas,
however, in the case of the other pages, the sign stands on the leftt
and the ordinary Devangari numeral sign on the right hand side
of the page ; in the case of the three first pages the Devanagri
numeral sign is sometimes also repeated below the syllabic marks.
Moreover, in the compounds of 1, 2, and 3, that is to say, numbers
like 11, 12, and 13, the syllabic signs are not always employed.
* Dr. Bhler " translated this article for the Pandit, who cannot expresa
himself in English, in order, among other objects, to secure the Pandit the
credit dne to him." The kindly intercession was by no means superfluous. The
good Pandit is one of the native scholars already referred to, who do not meet
with such fair play from every one.
+ Dr. Blilcr has somewhere referred to the practice of marking the first
throe pages with the separate syllables of the F^rfrT VT > ût I have mislaid
the reference.
58
They may be made by writing the syllabic sign for 10 above the
ordinary numeral sign.
The sign for 7, which the Pandit writes tr, and Kielhorn (Re
port) or iff, is in the Cambay MSS. $. In 27, 37, &c, the sign
used is that given by Kielhorn.
The sign for 20 is, as the Pandit gives it, . Kielhorn found
* or q-, sir or J.
The sign for 30 is tft, never, so far as I could see, tfi, which
Kielhorn gives. That for GO is, as the Pandit has it, . Kielhorn's
X here may be a misreading.
Permission to make a catalogue was again given ; but scholars
owe it to the benevolent activity of the Dewan that this time the
promise was kept, and not abandoned as soon as the European
scholar had been forced to quit the place. The list, which
will be placed in the first Appendix to this report, is the work of
Mr. Ramchandra Shastri, with whom I have carefully gone over the
proofs twice, in the hope of putting it out in as readable a form
as possible. I am not satisfied that the keeper of the books has even
yet disclosed the whole of the treasures in his charge ; but it will be
seen that inspection has been given of a very large collection of most
valuable MSS.; and I trust that the list as it stands will be acceptable.
The following notes, with regard to all of which I am largely in
debted to Mr. Ramchandra Shastri, are put forward with no other
pretension than to call the attention of scholars to what has ap
peared most noteworthy in a rapid review of the list.
The Vasudevahinda, No. 2, in
.,
.
,.
. i
,
.,
three parts, would seem to have been writ
ten by various hands : as S a t gha d d a g a ni, No. 8, is not in this list credited with the authorship of
more than the first section.
No. 2.The Vaeudevahinda.
. a,,. 6 .
j
No. 8.The Srijinendracharitram, otherwise called
the Padmanbhakvyam of
Amara chandra.
The Cambay MS. of a work, which

.
,
.
. . . ..
is now for the first time, it is believed,
brought to notice, was written in Samvat
- ^_
1297 = A.D. 1241. It differs from a copy
of the same work which I have secured for Government, No. 285 of
the present collection, in containing, at the end of the poem, a
prakstisarga, which is probably of great value. I hope later to
secure a copy of this sarga. The author of the poem, Amara
59
chandra, was the pnpil of chrya-ri-Jinadattasrt,

who may be the same as the teacher of that name who died at
Ajamera (Ajmr) Samvat 1211 = A.D. 1145*
I made enquiries about this book on my return to Bombay, and
was gratified to receive, through the instrumentality of my pupil,
Mr. Ramdass Chubildass, a good copy, which however unfor
tunately, as has been said, does not contain the chapter with the
genealogy .f The author tells us that he has composed his work on
the model of Hemachandra's Trishashtisalkpurushacharitram.
The spiritual genealogy of sr-Pradyumnasri, who corrected for the
,
,_
.
author Dev a sur this poetical account
of antiutb, No. 9, is after the usual
reference to Mahvra, the twenty-one Jinas, the two " childless "
pupils of Mahvrra, Gautama, and Sudharma, and the fourteen prvas carried up to Hart bh adra, with regard to whom, it is
mentioned, that he was the author of one hundred and fourteen books.
This, I am told, is commonly stated among the Jains at the present
day. Next, though not, of course, in immediate succession, comes
D eva sr i not the author of the present book who is identified
for us by the fact that the world's teacher, Bern a chan d rasri,
is spoken of as his pupil. This Devasri wrote in prkrit the Srutivrittam, which we have here, done into Sanskrit, and put more
concisely,}: by a later writer of the same name. The great HemaNo. 9.The Sntinthachantram tola in verse by
Devasri.
* Throughout what follows I have consulted Klatt's valuable paper in the

Indian Antiquary, September, 1882, entitled Extracts from the Historical
Eecnrds of the Jainae.
+ This copy of the work was presented to me ; and made over by me to
the Government collection.
X There is an interesting verbal resemblance between the language Devasri
employs of his own work as an adapter
ift "4]^ 4?tf 4T^rt fn. I

sft^rifrrr^ ff^T tfT &4r( *P II
and a verse of Somadeva's, the real meaning of which is still perhaps a moot
question
^%""'^ T ft^ II
See the note in the second Appendix to this Report, p- ( 121. )
GO
OPRATIONS IN SEARCH OF SANSKRIT MSS.
chandra comes next.

at in the verse :
His conversion of king Kumrapla is glanced
Ûfl 4Al4l4 M^4*j,ft ifr II

" Let ns honour that sr-Hemasri, by the nectar of whose words,
of power to enlighten a king, beasts even were raised to a seat among
the immortals." Hemachandra is followed in this enumeration by
r-Devnandasuri, with regard to whom the statement is made
that he wrote and himself explained a grammar called the Siddh a r as va tain a b d n s s a n am :
K^KHdUs *fihm 4114 WA II
Sri Devanndasri had a pupil called ri-Kanakapr abha,
and he in his turn a pupil called s r -P r a d y m n a. He corrected
this book. I find tho statement that Sntintha attained Nirvana,
4N4W+U4, at a trtha called Kotisila. In the epilogue to this
book, Devasri, the author of the work, is praised as having over
thrown the supremacy of Brihaspati :
And we- are told that ho was installed by the suri sri-Madanendu,
as that teacher's successor.
This book was written in Samvat 1338=a.d. 1282.
, , , ,,
No. 10
12. T,Badrabh's
commentary on tho vasyakasutra with notes by Tila-
In Klatt's_rpaper
r already
* referred to, it is
stated that Bhadrabuhu of the Prachinagotra composed the Upasargaharastotra,
the Kalpastra, and Niryuktis on ton

sastras, viz., Avasyaka, Dasavaikhfdika, &c, He died in 170 V., at
the age of 76. The present book preserves for us the substanco of
this old writer's commentary on the Avasyakasutra, with the com
ments of a later writer who speaks as modestly of the gap between
himself and his subject, as Klidsa himself, but who hopes that his
own deficiencies may render him all the more acceptable as a guide
to other babes in the faith :
*<| ^r fTrTT: ^Hiiwwrg |1 *r4wi: Il

1<| tw <*1*>>>3 Il
CI
^.^5^'^ frôr^. Il
1 ^ ^farnrsr 1 1
Of his own spiritual genealogy Tilakahrya gives the follow

ing account: He was the pupil of r-S iv apr a bhasri, who
succeeded e r%- Ch r e sv a r a su r i, who succeeded s r t-D A ar
ma ff h eh a. King Jayashhbadeva, we are told, was a " swan at
the lotus feet of Dharmaghosha." That teacher's predecessor was
r-Chandraprabha.
The closing lines of the book give an interesting glimpse of the way.
in which, in that old time, books were finally prepared for publication.
The sage, conscious of his own weakness, but in his master's strength,
has made this commentary on the Avasyakastra. What through
haste he may have explained amiss the learned world is humbly asked
to correct : and a prayer is put up that the merit of the work may
not be entirely lost to the worker :
tf*lf3*RjsM 4*1*1 di fHWN^jf

H<*kT *rf*T fTrlfTi: ^ftP^Hr^f^fif: II
ffrT <*) -4dl =twr *1"<1*1 1
4=t ^ ' Il
Then follows the date put in verse like the rest of the epilogue,
that it may endure so long as the book shall last.
AM4H*l1H T^ ^'': I
fTft ff^T4T nR# II
" When twelve hundred of the years of Vikrama the king were
gone, in the ninety-sixth year this commentary was made." The
book was therefore composed in A.D. 1240 ; and the Cambay copy
was written in that town, where we may presume it has remained
ever since, in a.d. 1389.
But the book is not yet ready to be published. Before it under
goes that ordeal it must bo revised or corrected ; and that labor of
62
love is undertaken for the Master by " onr virtuous and learned
pupil," sri- P admasri, who has been in that work " an eye to
help us. "
Mention must also be made of another pupil, of lower rank,* who
has written out the new work in this its first copy.f
What follows has been added by the scribe of the Cambay copy;
and is not without its own interest
riR^fi II
^rcrgrrcrwrnt rfarfNjii; Il
The name of the scribe was Mloka, and he got his commission
from Mlhanadev, who desired in tbis way to do something for
the good of the soul of her dead son. As her husband's name is not
mentioned it is probable that Mlhanadev was a widow.
of M0ale^sthaatapadka
This is a collection of queries, put,

wording to the story, to the sage Dhar-
maghosha, by a certain over-proud suri,

and of the detailed answers with which Dharmaghosha confuted
his opponent, with a commentary by Mahendrasi m h a. The
method is a favourite one in Jain books ; and we may recall, in
connection with it, both tberesponsa prudentium of the Roman lawyers,
* Padmaprabha is called sri-Padmaprabhasri, a fact which would indicate
that Tilakachrya, at tho time of writing, had already indicated Padmaprabha
as his snccessor.
t Prathamdare. If I am right in the way in which I have taken this
phrase, it shows that Sdarsa, as applied to a book, is neither, as the St. Peters
burg Dictionary appears to take it, a copy in the strict sense of that word, nor,
as Wilson explained it (B. R. sub voce) , the original manuscript from which a
copy is taken. Adarsa may be appliod indifferently to such an original manu
script, and to all copies taken from it. Each is a ' glass ' in which the reader
may the reflection of the author's mind.
63
and the questions with which the Scribes and Phariseee ''sought to
puzzle" the teacher they hated. The latter perhaps of the two pre
sente the closer analogy ; as the specific object of the one party, in
this game of question and answer, is generally, as here, represented
as being to confound rather than to seek instruction.
The date of the composition of the text of the Prasnottaram, or
3
12
Catechism, is given both in a chronogram gunarasaravi, and in

figures, Samvat 1233=a.d. 1207. The author, Dharmaghosha is
said to have succeeded srmaj Jayasimhasri, who was
the pupil of trim ad Ar y a r alcshtitasri. The present
4
e
commentary was composed in the year from Vikrama ndadhigraha12
suryasiikhye, or Samvat 1294=a.d. 1238, by a suri who can only

have been one remove from the author of the text.
of B^rfbfi7uThe Nirynkti8
We have already, No. 12, seen mention

made of Badrabhu, who, according
to the pattvals of theKharataragacbehha,

" composed the Upasargaharastotra, the Kalpasutra and Niryuktis on
ten sastras, viz., Avaiyaka, Dasavarklika, &c, lived forty-five years
in griha, seventeen in vrata, fourteen as yugapradhna, and died in
170 V., at the age of seventy-six."* From the present fragment of a
volume containing the Niryuktis of this writer, we learn that they were
commentaries on the following works (1) the Avasyakastra, (2) the
Dasavaiklikastra, (3) the Uttardhyayanastra, (4) the AchAragastra, (5) the Sukritat'igastra, (G) the Dasasrutaskandastra, (7)
the Kalpastra, (8) the "Vyavahrastra, (9) the Sryaprajnapti, and
(10) the Rishibhshitni.
No. 29. A copy of t NT\ 29 8 f a contary on
Chandra's commentary on the Jivasamasaprakaranam by the great
theJivasamAsaprakaranam, H em ac/i and r a. The book ends with
written with his own hand. ,,
,
.,
the abrupt statement jivasamasavnttihi
samapta, " the commentary on the jivasamiisa is finished," no author's
name being given. The reason for this omission, if we may trust
the colophon and I know of no reason why we should not trust it
is that we have here a venerable relic in the shape of an original copy
of one of Hemachandra's works :
Indian Antiquary, September 1882, p. 210.
64
ftrPt W8 5 \\V* %& V H^q-f Mt4<jlf^r>4Pi% **?4^rf^tff*nT4 * |<1 1 4 r*tWsTtesTrilfa ^ q * rq I "i ( I l\ tf

inj
" The number of the granthas is 6627. In Samvat 1164 [=A. d.

1108] this day, being Monday the fourth of the light half of the
mouth Chaitra, here, in Holy Anahilaptaka in the reign of the king
of kings, Jaynsimhadeva, conqueror of Kalyna, the ' devout and
learned' svetmbara teacher bhattraka sr Hemachandrchirya
wrote down this book."
The terms in which Hemachandra here speaks of himself, and
which 1 have translated freely, " devout and learned" refer more to
his disposition (yamaniyamasvdhyyadhynnushfchnarata), and
what may be called his official status (paramanaishthikapandita)
than to personal achievements ; and need not in them selves be any
bar to the acceptance of this assumption as genuine, even if we put
out of sight the consideration that Hindu authors, as a rule, were not
much troubled with false modesty. I leave the question to more
competent hands ; but it was impossible not to dwell for a moment on
the interest attaching to a book, which may be in the handwriting
of the great teacher who, writing when English history was hardly
yet begun, has, from his urn,* ruled the spirits of so many generations,
and is potent still.
The scribe, of what must be a copy of
No. 33.The
Sabdanus- the
,,
, , , .
....
,
sanavritti
of Hemachandra.
bdannsasanavptti
contemporary
with Hemachandra himself, more learned
than his present congeners, here gives a clue to his date in one of
the verses he appends at the end of the book :
^^^ ^% ^1^1 II
" Sr Bhima now gives a new version of the Mahbhrata, by
conquering Karna and the Sindhu king, a foe (or foes) hard to beat."t
' -
-~f
* " The great of old !
The dead but sceptred sovrans who still rale
Our spirits from their urns."
Byron's Manfred, Act iii., Scene iv.
t Compare, " Then Bhima, crossing tho bridge, advanced with his army into
Simili, the Baj of which country, whose name was Hummook, coming to oppose
N THE BOMBAT CIRCLE.
65
The row of Jain books is broken here

by a Brahminical work on erotics by one
*
.
Dmodaragupta, which would appear to

be of a somewhat amusing character. The scene of the poem is
laid at Benares, a city whose courtesans even, we are told, may attain
union to biva. One Mlati, ' an ornament of her sex ' (yoshidbhushanam), who is described as
"!* 3t"^heJnmbha.u"
matam of Dmodaragupta.
4*lrf^<H Hiri- rtirtMHW-M: ftrfrT: *: I
and who may be the same as the Sutnbhal who gives the book its
title, heard one day from the terrace of her house the Ary verse* :
4^$'|<4 4K4ft<uft: i
" Trust not, women, in your youth and beauty ; but make
yourselves acquainted with the methods of acquiring the hearts of
your lovera." Mlati determines within herself that this is the
advice of a friend, and sets off to the house of Vikarl, whose ' door
was beset with lovers, ' from her to learn those
"Wonderful ways
For beguiling the hearts of men."
No.
.-The
Togasstram of Hemachandra, with
the commentary by the
ame author.
'
The
history
,
' of .this copy
FJ of Hemachan,,,.,,
dra s Yogasastravivaranam as told in the
added at the end, is interesting in
.
.
.
more ways than one. Written in Samvafc
1292 = A.D. 1236, it was presented to P ad ma d evasri, the
immediate successor osri-Mnatugasuri, by a Jain Sister,
if we may so speak, the whole story of whose ' taking the vow ' is
here told at length. The merchant Ganiyaka, of the lineage of
Dharkkata, and his guileless wife Gunasrh, had one child only, a
daughter whom they loved dearer than life.f Standing by the sido
of Sister Prabhvat, this dearly loved child took at the hands of
the good teacher Pradyumnasri, the five great vows, to injure no
him in fight, a contest ensued. The Moon-descended Bhima fought valiant,
ly, and taking many prisoners, subjected to himself the Raja of Sindh. Bhima
next went against Kama the Baja of Cheda, who made submission." Forbe'
Bas Mala, Vol. I., p. 83.
* This common device takes the place with Indian writers of our motto pre
fixed to a book.
t Join +!^.
i
66
OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OF SANSKRIT USB.
living creature, to speak no falsehood, to rob no man of his goods,

to keep her virginity, to know nothing as her own. Thereafter she
became the servant, the bee that hovered round the lotus feet of
the sisters Jagasih, Udayasrh, and Srchritrasrih, and caused this
book to be written and presented to the teacher who had initiated
her.*
The spiritual genealogy of sr-Mnatungasri, the immediate
predecessor of the recipient of the book, is, in the lines immediately
preceding, carried np to s r -M d had e v a of the house of Chandra.
In his line rose prabhu M ana tu hgag ana Lhrxt, in his
Buddhisdgaraguru, in his Pradyumnasri. Pradynmnasiiri had a pupil Devach and raga na lh rit, known far
and wide as the leader of the gachchha, a lord among the wise
(munsvara). Devachandra had two chief pupils; the first sriMdnadeva, the other s - P r n a e.h. a n d r a. The MAnatuiigasriguru, who was the preceptor of our Pradyumnasiiri, sat in
the seat of sr-Mnadeva. The writing of the book was completed
on Sunday the eighth day of the light half of the month Kitika,
in Samvat 1292.
In his " India : What can It teach us ?"
No. 41 Siddhasenadir..,
' commentary on the P- 36, Max Mller refers to Bhao Daji
Pravachanasroddiira of statement to the effect that Jain records
Nemichandra.
,.
<-,,<

i
,
mention uiddhascnasuri, a learned Jain
priest, as the spiritual adviser of Vikramditya. Professor Jacobi,
it is added, states in his Kalpastra Pref., p. 14, that Siddhasena
is a Jain author, who is said to have made the Samvat era for
king Vikramditya.
My shastri recognised tho present workf as, of two commentaries
on Nemichandra's Pravachanasroddhra, that attributed to Siddkasenadivdkara; and his story with regard to this writer is
as follows. Divkara was a Brahmin proud of his learning, who
was conquered in argument by the Jain Vriddhavdin, and in pur
suance of an engagement he had given, became thereupon the convert
and pupil of his opponent, taking the name Siddhasena in addition
to his own. For the sin of having presumptuously thought to turn
* I am told that at the present day women in the Jain community who desire
to abandon the world never have the vows administered to them by men, but
by those of their own , who are already religious recluses.
t Compare No. 149.
67
the sacred books of the Jains from Mgadh into Sanskrit, he was
ordered by Vriddhvadin to visit all the Jain temples in existence ;
and he spent twelve years in the performance of this penance.
Coming one day to Ujjayin he entered the temple of Mahdev
in the vicinity of that city, which is still a place of pilgrimage ;
aud, instead of worshipping the Ungarn, lay down, pat his feet np
against it, and so fell asleep. The startled worshippers of Siva
brought Vikramfiditya to the place, who, disregarding the sage's
assurance, that the lingam would have flown to pieces if he had
worshipped it, or shown it any sign of respect, ordered him to be
beaten a sacrilegious wretch. With the first blow shrieks were
heard from the women's apartments, and it soon became known that
each blow administered to Siddhasena told, not upon him, but upon
the person of the king's favourite wife. Siddhasena was released ;
and raised his hand as if in honour of the lingam. Straightway it
was broken in two ; and a great light appeared, in the midst of
which was seen the majestic form of Rishabhadeva.
No. 57.-A Chrnt and
Vritti on tho Pkshikapratikramauastra.
This is a which in Samvat =

A.D. 1240, certain pilgrims from Nigpnr,*
whose names are given, having heard the
scriptures expounded "here in Vjapur,*" in the paushadhasl, or

Hall of Fasting, by Devendrs ri, V in ay ach and r as ri,
and D e v a bh a d r a g a n i, and having considered that the world is
nought, caused to be written for the use of the faithful.
No. 53.-AbhayadevaSri's commentaries on the
tttras of the four angas.
. Tê date of the composition of this work

is given as Sarilvat 1120=A.D. 1064 :
an(j jt deserves noto tnat the present copy
was written Samvat 1184=a.d. 1123, only sixty-four years later.

Abhayadevasri finished the book in Anahila-ptak, in the
Dusserah of the year mentioned, and in correcting it he was assisted
by a host of pandits of whom D n a is singled ont as the chief.
No. 60.-The BhuvanaThe a?thor of this F V a eundankathu of Vijayasim- i m h a sr i who wrote in Samvat 1365=
^^
A.D. 13u0, calls himself the pupil of
Samudrasri; and he refers to the works of Pdalipta,
p ab ha t ti, and Haribhadr a.
* Both citios in Gujarath.
68
No. 62. ailngaeri's

commentary on the Achflrngaetram.
This manuscript was written in Samvat

1303=A.D., 1247, when Vsaldeva was
king ^ Anahila-ptak, for the use of this
great minister Tejahpala.

No. 111.Vivekamanjar
In the last lines of his book As ad a ia
of Asada.
called the son of Raja a tu a, the orna
ment of the race of Bhillamla. Bhillarnla is the Sanskrit form of
the name of the town now called Bhinmal in Marwar. Asada
wrote in the year whose sign is the eight vastis, the four oceans,
and the twelve suns, i. e. 1248=a.d. 1192.
This is a hand-book for poets, written
,
T
, ,,
,.
,
.,
a Jam at the time when the great
Jayasimha was king (a.d. 1094=1143)
His book contains at least one verse which should not be allowed to
perish :
No. 120.TheKaviikeh
of Jayamangalchrya.
" It is no sin not to write verses ; for that a man need neither die
nor take a beating : but to write bad verses, this is a fault in the
eyes of all wise men."
mbpaâkV ~ ~
No. .-Siddhaseims.
ri'e commentary or Nemiroddhato
Pravachan8a-
This fragment preserves for us the fact

f? Jin abh a d ra mu n i, pupil of
Slibhadra, wrote in [Samvat 1204=a.p
1148.
A complete copy of the work already
noticed under No. 41. The text ends
with a Jain rendering of the Roman
poet's
" dum Capitolinm

Scandet enm tacita virgino pontifcx,"
which the commentator is at some pains to reconcile with the
indifference that befits a saint :
4*i*iui-Hi^^r<r tr ? qfmt %
69
Wrr [} ] ,j7#vrr? *im<Hm4h

J41-H-4 ^^ ^rRr^flKCT^ ft*i*<Hf^dchiy<f|f4-
fisarqfrK444.'4ii4îR:ri<>4 rfPjFnwrg il
Ya de vas r i, Nemichandrasri and Vijay as na sr , were three pupils, in that order, of Amradev a suri,
who was the pupil of Jin a ch an dr a.
No. 122.The SobhanaThe last book I can refer to here enjoys
etuti.
a great reputation among the Jains, but
to our minds must present a melancholy specimen of perverted inge
nuity. It is a poem in ninety verses so constructed that the second
and fourth lines of each verse agree, to the letter, in sound, but
present a different sense. The author, S bh an ch a, is said
to have been the brother of Dhanapla.
Before closing this Report I desire, as one of the officers placed by
Government in charge of the search for Sanskrit manuscripts in the
Bombay Circle, to enter my protest against the view that the work
may, so far as the Bombay Circle is concerned, be held to be Hearing
its term. It is under this, or some similar impression, 1 am persuaded,
that Government have been induced to sanction the diversion, to
purposes not originally contemplated, of little less than half the grant
assigned by the Government of India "for the discovery and preserva
tion of the records of ancient Sanskrit literature."* In Dr. Biihler's
time that sum stood, as originally fixed by the Government of India
for Bombay, Rajputana, Central India, and the Central Provinces, at
Rs. 8,000. The first raid upon this by no means extravagant sum was
* I quote this definition of the purposes of the search from the Government
of India Resolution in the Home Department of 9th February 1878. How little
it is the case that tho preparation of a catalogue raisonne was one of the main
objects for which tho search was originally ordered by the Government, will be
best seen if I reproduce here the opening paragraphs of that Eesolution :
" Resolution.At the instance Of Pandit Rdh&krishna, of Lahore, a scheme
was sanctioned by a Resolution in the Home Department, dated 3rd Novem
ber 1868, for the discovery and preservation of the records of ancient Sanskrit
literature at an outlay of Rs. 24,000 per annum. The chief features of the
scheme were as follows :
70
committed by Dr. Burgess, who succeeded in diverting Rs. 1,500 to

his work on inscriptions. In November, 1881, " when on the point of
leaving India," Dr. Kielhorn formally advised Government that the
diminished grant of Rs. 6,500 was a great deal too much for the
purpose in hand; and that the Rs. 2,000 required for his scheme for
a catalogue raisonne of the Poona collection might be taken from
(1) " To print uniformly all procurable unprintod lists of the Sanskrit manu
scripts in Indian libraries, and to send them to the various learned
Societies of Europe, and to individual scholars in Europe and India,
with an intimation that the Government will carefully attend to their
suggestions as to which of the manuscripts therein mentioned should
be examined, purchased, or transcribed ;
(2) " to institute searches for manuscripts, and to this end to prepare list
of desirable codices ; to distribute these lists among scholars and
other persons willing to assist in the search, with a request that they
will report their discoveries to such officer as may, from time to time,
be appointed by the Government of India ; and to depute competent
4-1 *-/;
*-
scholars on tours through the
several Presidencies and Pro
o.sr
a <
vinces to examine the manu

3
S-3a
scripts reported npon, to seek

J3 *
J
"5
9
<
new manuscripts, topurchase
SE
mannscripts procurable at
reasonable rates, and to have
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
copies made of uch mann
1,000 1,000 1,200 3,200
scripts as are unique or other
1,000 1,000 1,200 3,2u0
wise desirable, but which the
Madras
and
1,000 1,000 1,200 3,200
possessors
refuse to part
North- Western
600
600
000 1,000
with ; and
* Li
X ZJ
Oadh
Central
500
500
5"0
500
>
coo
1,000
1,600
Pro
6(10
500
1,0 0 1,000
600 1,000
1,200 .-.-
6,000 6,000 7,200 10,200
PrintingNative
catalogue of
desirable ma
nuscripts
A dditi onalgrant
" Asiatic So
ciety
San cies
1,000
...
3000
800
24,000
(3) " to grant to the Asiatic Society

of Bengal an additional al
lowance for the publication
of Sanskrit works hitherto
unprinted.
The statement given in the margin
shows the financial result of the
scheme, i.e., how the Es. 24,000 sanc
tioned as the annual expense for
carrying it out are distributed."
After a review of the several results, the Government of India resolved thai
these warranted a prosecution of the search.
IN THE BOMBAY CIECLH.
71
the grant without prejudice to the objects for which the grant was
sanctioned, "The allotment of Rs. 2,000 for cataloguing purposes,"
Dr. Kielhorn wrote, " will leave only Rs. 4,500 for the purchase of
new manuscripts. But in my opinion this sum will now, when
unknown or desirable manuscripts become rarer every day, and
after I have secured for Government many of the ancient palm-leaf
MSS. known to exist, bo amply sufficient, and I venture to point
out that the proper cataloguing of the manuscripts which Govern
ment possesses is as important a matter as the acquisition of new
manuscripts, and was one of the main objects for which the search
was originally ordered by the Government of India."*
I am persnaded that no one who is himself actively engaged in
the search for manuscripts in India will homologate the views here
expressed, in so far as they point to the desirability of contracting
our efforts for the discovery and purchase of unknown works, or of
better copies than those already secured of known works. To it
seems that the time is ripe for effecting even more than has yet
been done ; and that Dr. Bhler's great success in India, and the
acquisition of palm-leaf MSS., to which Dr. Kielhorn is here
referring, are an incentive rather than a discouragement to future
effort.
In two important respects the existing conditions are certainly
more favourable than those in which Dr. Biihler had at first to work.
Thanks to au enlightened encouragement of secondary education, we
have, scattered over the country, a body of men who have learnt
Sanskrit in our colleges, and who, I am confident, want only
leading and encouragement, to explore libraries in numbers vastly
greater than the officers in charge of the search can hope to under
take, with an energy and intelligence which may be trusted to secure
good results. And it is also, I think, true that the old feeling of
jealousy as to the motives and objects of Government in making this
search is dying out. That feeling, in so far as the educated classes
are concerned, was by no means either unnatural or unjustifiable at
the time when the search was first ordered, and when a Secretary to
the Council of the Governor-General was found urging that everything
* Dr. Kielhorn's letter to the Director of Public Instruction of 30th Novem
ber 1881, as given in Government Resolution in the Educational Department
No. 2053, 27th December 1881.
72 OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OP SANSKRIT MS3. IN THE BOMBAT CIRCLE.
obtained in working out the scheme should be "sent to Europe."*

It is now generally understood that the work is not being prosecuted
on lines with which no one could reasonably expect a native
scholar to sympathise ; and we have year by year in greater force the
active support of the educated classes throughout the country. The
unreasoning prejudice raised on religious grounds is dying more
slowly ; but in that respect, too, matters are steadily improving. And
I need not say that when that last obstacle vanishes, results may
confidently be looked for of supreme importance.
In these circumstances it will be readily understood that it is
matter of great regret to me personally that, after long waiting, I
find myself put in part charge of the work of travelling and purchas
ing books over a district which comprises nearly a third of the
peninsula, with a yearly grant for all expenses of Rs. 2,225.f I venture
respectfully to urge that the sum is altogether inadequate ; and to
express the hope that arrangements may be possible for restoring the
grant to the amount originally sanctioned out of Imperial revenues.
I would fain hope, also, that it may be found possible to elicit, in favour
of an undertaking that has the support of the most enlightened of
the native community, that public spirit in the private citizen which
has never been wanting in Bombay. I have in this connection to
tender here my best thanks to theBombay Branch of theRoyal Asiatic
Society for permitting this Report to appear as a number of their
Journal, and for contributing towards the expense of its publication.
" To Europe we should send everything obtained in working out this
scheme,original MSS., copies, extracts ; for in Europe alone are tho true
principles of criticism and philology understood and applied, and, fifty years
hence, in Europe alone will any intelligent interest be felt in Sanskrit literature.
There will then, it is safo to say, be as few Sanskrit scholars in India as there
are now Greek scholars in Groece."Note by Mr. Whitley Stokes. See Gough'a
Eecords of Ancient Sanscrit Literature, p. 5.
t Mr. Bhandarkar and I have had the disposal of Es. C,500 during the
year under report. But that was due to the fact that as yet nothing has had
to be paid towards the catalogue scheme.
***/
4 W #***>&: g I
<KW<I4i44W<Î f<^4<i*An^- Il \ Il
ô
r^RTc^ II ^ Il
*Kul4(RliTT ^5% FTlTcT II

ô tff^rr^ f^ II \00 II
fiKiRf*i gn 4<*rPi4fc3 M
CRT Jsft^f^nt4Frfrtir Mt URU^HIcH # H
o \ cianforcr *
% Il
EXTRACTS FROM MANUSCRIPTS
|: TTFr: 51 II ^ ||
qPr-KjfiWltu<<H|iWJ \ II
^^- [ II
^<W<4W Sr crfrqf^ffIWi II II
*o ^ *<* 14e*
Iftw finito fmzt ^
f^rrt T# T^r ^ STSfa" cl^MW I

y*>4Wdww $ rnr *<$ faRr: II \ H
$ "(1|| ^ ^ |
fai +IÎW ^^ II 49 II
# 3V-*1 *
jR ^ II f" ft44lHl4R<Rl<l $1 ^^71 f-TStf W%4fr5r : ^ II
tK^rajHfei cf^4.^4dî ^f? ,
^ 4ftdM4)4llfUfr W3cT4T TTfWTrn ^^:

q" *14ldW *: <KIrtfr4d<44*lTb4| - ^ ^ II ~
ACQUIRED POE GOVERNMENT.
Ht frrfq- JlcRT [4t] FcR^PT: Il

^ [fa] it+IUm ?R: 47* []
>> : RTiR- Il
5nTri%Ts|J|-^: 4MK ^TTT: Il \ Il
3Ta"5?^S*4fc*jajf9iWdci: I
4T : 4ft" Jb^"!! ^ II
$ffa fp n<h^^ ^ i
1:< %T ^ : : Il II
htkw cNt t 3fa ^ for: i.

*lllR4ÎAflct: ^4 TfrcT: Il . II
%fcr % *1*<1 * it
IM fcR" nPIT c14l4 4+14R I
fSTfr ^PIR e%^Tf^T: Il \f Il
^r?r ^r ^ IRUÎfcT: I
^+KAUsir 5ft? STPTfsWsr Il ^ H
75
76
iHt ftfcf: Al+dlrtlftq^ Il 44 II

$ il4"iCl4N i
ftWr $W^f%nf4ftcr: <\ Il
fiMH |tr ++^^; i
Mtg: ^^" ifdcy^ Il <3.
5tl^l <Nf% : $+|: I
^Mwlfet^ FPTiRIFHTcj; Il * Il
#: * (M4riJ.gl4r: Il ^ Il
*!4Ult4l*l 53^ 5: Il Il
1+ HtiHH\i 5% rh; i
**
I^HMRr 4 ^5* tH14+lR *; I

WUftK:tfer: tffarM ^: Il 8 II
%% -4\k4*h +lRldl II \oo

|<t 4ftiRfe4<Hl4ll4A^cli43AI*ld+ ^^" 1 l
"
ral5"^flrjiui4d} :
cmTf <*3^t i
JiTRFir ^STRT ^ ^ )1 II \ II
^ I frTTfT ^RT: I ^4>SM
l^loilHaHHI!, +l*H^NH|t, Il
3f ^'^MK^RrlN?^ 3TFTT ^; Il
II
ACQUIRED POR GOVERNMENT.
77
alt" & ^ ^
^ PlUMJsqT: SR ^RT#^R#T II
MWtWW^M4^7l4l4<W^N<ht 4Ah|UHI434TCnnior
ang^Ni^rt ^; Il \ Il
^ RteTj [ 5 ] HTfE^MlH+l \ H^RT^ Il
* ^ #T WH frfr IFT ^. [5] |#
5> ^ ? ?fr 31 afî 1 4fM<y=l ^
^" Hyriy $=~| 5=TW^T4W 14.: 3RH<M4 +1^ +1 <s^l|5||tra^44>rfWNN&'TWT ^M<#1*1<|/ ^ ? iR ^nfer = it: ^- ^bdl ^
g^F7ff^T4^ 11 il
g?ww c^r^reflg^FPraw * gpT^"
4ptrt .dirfw fipi 3 Trr ^+! il
îcit? cTiffiKiN w#r wfr ^ FcTig wft II
Il Il ^ Il
\ ^ [^] *hf [$] n+ThcKwwH,

\
$.
l4: +ljHIfj: Il
3RF4T d4KI34W40r |": Il
3?^r-4ft,!Hciwiitiii^Mrtiig4rar:
Rffrt|JiJNNH sr fa*\ Il
441 *%^* -! Il
FT^T +ft4cl44l II
^ i&i ct+AH 4<<1)3<1 () -f: Il
\o : Il
78
\ tptr1Rshii+ ^; Il
\ rj^4w Piffr 3dHi44^cin
X49
V
\*
ô
41
11^^^14 : Il
^ &f h<hi
^;1^<5 Qfc II
#3+1?1': II
^S^^fc 4Î^JW'J|: II
*l*R<l4ll5|4at <<MfdU: II
^^^ m& tta: Il
44 5RTrR4TcRr#N ^ : Il
arfwpr^RKT: $ II
49 PWcNIiH [r] ^|0||^: Il

V 4TfIrnr^ \: Il
4 cRJJTfq" &1- tl": Il
41 ?-11 fort: Il
rcw^r
^ arWTcRr ft*T4 >RT [FT] 41% Il
4 44WI4^+4T 4?PHijk: Il
44 *pthi4hw m
4^
449
\
\
4
iPrM-diMtbtWHW %: Il
lUMUMJlPwJliftb': Il
^^ II
3^pRTJT 5Jrnr5l: Il
^^^+: -^-i+H. H
<** fWHr: Il
|H4lt4N<Mif tfffHr: Il
ACQUIRED FOE GOVERNMENT.
mwsrqf^n:: il
8$. ?^1<1>11^^ il
8^ 3Tftsf?q-R f^RWTET: Il
^" *<-1 II
48 ^<1+^ (^^#^%: II
A 3frfan>HHHq*fnft: II
V* qfEmNFT spfojrf H44\mW' Il
ffT^: Il
< fW: iRHlff^ Il
fW falrT-qr r^r: Il
U ^-iiAiAfi $1 :
<8 4d4q+ff4HmWif [*#] itwt^. il
<. ?i4iui4h~4im f C^] :
$ cR^TPT RPiR ": Il
^ Jd^HKHl: Il
*
*X
^
^
^lTf,^4.K 3Rj: ||
WcKM-IWlR <P# ^r [] 5|%; Il
4TW qf^q-: ^ Il
f^creJFqwtfrT: 4*4f*l: Il
^8 ^t$R II
79
80
EXTRACTS PROM MANUSCRIPTS
^
*
^
*
ftANwk^T *4-: Il
^-^%%": Il
hi ^ 1#'31:;
4miRh fm\Q
^ iRST4Td4K44l4lTf: Il
o ff&T 11( II
if3IFtf%: qfcPTTTi Il
i *<-\ : Il
" fagqfpt t^f? : il
r^q^T4-4WI4<1<=h<H T? Il
^ mi qfrffrr: Il
^\ an*UH<tel4: [] II
^ fcrr Or) fi?"-
^ ?:^^^^?^^^^": Il
<^
^
V
^
\oo
-^+^: Il
^TF^tntW (tf) f^cTU. Il
areit pfMfftlR^*: M
?^ ^ [] wM<fac**fr qn:
R^d^J qfcPte |: Il
1 qî^^H $ ii
\o^ ^^ Dr] s^llNi" : Il
ôy TMlNdl: SIKT^K-T^ %SR ÎH '
\\ 1^: H
\o. '|.^ iM*1N4|uiH 4IH4i\ Il
\ovs 3Tr^ft3 ; Il
ACQUIRED ! GOVKNKENT.
$ 5^ irr ^ hw
^1|+(|^<?1 <<H+c4 ^flwNÎH0! 1 1
3To
%N|folH :
j^r mf ^<4-\
%+4^|1^ M^fad^rrewft : \
4(9
îft: H<=hlt$T ftfr &% 4W1% f^T-
%: 4i<Mdlf# cTf g% 4WI-H g^?: Il \<^ il

sTgfa'srfriT îî T4M
afflf:
JTWra^RTPT<'fbj4HifH4W4i4HWHîIi'i. "
fif^r^Fr ^^ [^] %wr> wbt

'!< r|'4îl RT rTFJH II
iiPTr frg ?1<41* Il
ni^r^WiT=TT if^^lKdl 5 II
^5": *RT FTR": m CTTW^nft II
W 1 ^Wmft ^ttFT I? Il
82
it? ^r l%TR?tf4 fa&tm II

- q^miw+l pr. Il
?Fc* Ifa ff #: T il" f^T: Il
W^WTtifa ^TFTfff f^" 4I" Il
|?%%^. +ifa+l ^: Il
^^ #"^": II
<[# " rf- nrfifrr: Il
dwwiâ^^ RiHi Hftf ^
(H44IH<y-4u'l *%f ff&4[4'flt^ttlTnr:

#: & * H
- ^<ptpt.
tt^fw tnr^ ; il
îIw^hi<"ir ! < - -+$|:

ffct 1'.
^ ^ 444 %\ W- I
%+1 *1 II
f >:
Fffft 44i il ^
15 -
<- : R1kN<qdl^<iNfhr1l4
ACQUIRED FOR GOVERNMENT.
- îmmZilfa- il \ il
^^^ 3<w4*>4w \\*(<*< ^! R^nr: II Il

44t\ *"< [] 4: Mfr
?4 RWr rWr* ^fad$cH: f55": |
# ^^^: Il \^ II
# WdMdWHdd ^FTff4TcTnrr
|<4>*% m W4$1 q^f% & Il \* Il
H"i^Nrfi RT ^"
rfP ^ iff f? pr: <*?%*#: Il \^ II
^m m &1 frT ^ ^ er?
^ rfrf 4T5TfJTcT <? ? qrr ^ i
^ 3FRqt 1?% ^
4WI4'I ^ * ^TtR-lt TT ^^ Il 8 Il
$ g^r Irrer lm4I4II4UII+I5 ^ T? *TT ITT ^>: I
5^: ^^ *
^ - a il
ft^r?riKuft giRcrr ^rerrrerrfrft
^' ^wrt 4TC?ft I
fj ffr^t^R * mNr
^ ^JRjq: ^ *<1- II. ^4 II
ifr ^^^^^^ ^^: T4TR": Il
85
84
IXTRACTS FROM MANUSCRIPTS
***^1 g?H il
5* ^ ftr%R g- tr:
<1IWM* 4" ^ ai40dtf"i RRTcTN4<1d|jfer RcT; Pt<"4Ul ^ spjqrFJ !\1: tW4s4. JHfriKNlPl *H4< Il
5T rt<b+0^^4li^=IMWe
& nfogfrt ^ IR: Il
^ f 4W: ^ndrtH4l<^l<+H ^ fW ^"qfP" ^ ^ffait
i ^dTlfcbMs^rflreruUi ? 1*<; *
to ^pftjqf -1*2> iPTRf " ^^; I

?iti%?f- if" " Mt Bj[] Il \ H
^" PNîe gdr 1%:^?1 :? ^ I
%4 4&tfo 5R =Tf 5* ^r 4^ff%
i^RFTpr flKÎRWW jt^; ?T-. t 4'- Il \ Il
to <4 ^TiTViiTRSR &Z 3t(fczW'-
r=TÊR14^ \ Il
ACQUIRED GOVERNMENT.
85
Wl-rUl^ ^FN ^^ : \\\\ II

TI%fw^ ^: ^- #: *44|+<1:
5W: ; II Il
33jh<&<iw r^qTR" -. H
fFTfrF^qtT^" Z44 4W 5 II
f4ul< Fjfajl .
Il > : R-^ Il
<nc4ioidfu<4 ^^ ^
'1^1^11*11 ^ II
? *\ (\< N4^ll*kiftRC II
" tRFfiTTtr 1 <Wdl^ Il
*^*7: -yif Sricf II
*HWIJH4tl^H4<*k<r4N"4<lHft [] ^^: ft-
tffa: HfNl*dRi *>:*^ Il

l4Mfti:
^ *^fft WHSc* =: Il M
86
to$ flt^T f^T^t" 3T W ?raT#Ndl<Hl dUHlfa-
ijo fft ?*>1

d4-H=R|p ^ I
XJ jRd4JWildl+f"ldl T
$*
fHH': qTKT-'fqra"| I il \ +fi>-
T^^fWTH^kK^Hi $faTRH;j3>3)d3f ^ f<T7#t

f- 4ft- M
^14)1 ^^^;
^ <-^<*1^ ^WHMd^KTAirKd^ I
1( igRTJ *l<M*Pfrt srtf
fTcRf^W^ irr^frT " Il
4WK&~4 J\ ftH ri II
=fl^<=IW
i? iild4^4^JJ5dlMd3P-4T4-
ACQUIRED FOB GOVERNMENT.
ferrer ftfrT:
*<^"3^< & : II
jm*w=Nh crfar i
tlFT *$ 4<hi\ti4: lfiRriT II
41^^
fit RTfT irjq- T i-lîW
RrtlW- grF ?f7?5,11% 4": I
CT JT: SEfn: ? iTT: qTS^ffi" >: Il
i^r^Wr fff^Rfr i: ^ N
^jnrrgrrtFr g^fri frrft*?rrri4 i

4ftf%: f4f^4 ^TR^S^SWt II
T3 TMMf RT4TT fa<MrtUf$Riftf5r<TI4
r+^d^4^!^: +^^1<*11^; Il
PWOT: <^+*1|: I
fMÎ^Mfa^r <dRad<H*3^rftf4^T?T: I
87
IITEACTS MANUSCRim
Co ô ^ ? ft ^ ^R- qfrs ^" II

TRSTTT? c?4fT * q- ^" - 4ft II V II
fo #o P7 r^f ^facf ^ 4f" fl^RT tffaH
7% ^ =Tf^T ijiirr ^Fl^S^r- W ff f arfrrf" 3TW9TT qtPr pra^Rr fi^Tf ^WlN %^r HW ^ CTfci<j:
rbij ^ 414^' 49 >?# trcTRHiNcuiiA-
"
^ ^ ^^gHH*fadlNcttMffa<HHî3[i
( II
^ H4d,u| ^^^^11%^5 gf^Fr i
^" 4?T4-44uiwui ? fruq; Il \ Il
* ft Il far*ferriq4 \ <\: fT I
ffrT 4?TFIT% R^rW iRRTcT: Il \ Il
H<JHH~te Kl: JjNrP: 4zfhw \ I
^ ^r r^TcRfTJwFnn?" -.
|: ftlU4-44K4lc4W
o ir ^ qsT T RpiT ? ^ TFTfW II
TPr TR" TT^ ^^ " \ i'

? ^;
to n^t: II \
TWTT^ (f%) ff^ 1 f&R fcfFitl I
3T3nf KHft 4farR3W ^^^: Il \ Il
fTifr^T R i 1 <1^^^ (
^ Nunw ^'/*! II
*?1%: ^K4tl<RliRt
qW%^-wqi%4TR T41 f% fMfr I
Mwi^Tjr ^ i^rtr g^R : Il *. Il
>
89
. Il ait II
? tl4^T^f^tr5^(4;) Il \ Il
"+1111<^^|1: Il
<>4lba444l^'4|JJn'r^r^K=)l<fRrg; Il
5iWfa fte 5 ~ 44 II
^ farforflfoPi; II II
. *nrttrWfrj tff : Il RTTcrrÎWil^" *?%^"
5: Il aîlfr: : w$ 4li ^ Il
*^1^+1^+<4+)<^1*+|*
1>^4>|: : Il
T4R|w|u| 4f-4Afiu|| I
. ftfd-HI^ 4dodl II \ Il
if'^ljf+'IWSr [f] gft (cf^^rwifAlidl^rt !

51*: 4" cHfq" yrftt ^WWM4H4 feTcRq" ft" W4 ^^ Il M
$ JJfMNt *4| ^ *1
fr (^r) S f%3 iff^rfj; ^r ?*: wrfas; i
$WIH4fo d-t34>^rt|EnTt Jcf: II 3, Il
u+î frrfafaiwr 5^<*}
&\ <RmR*.ii ;^: I
<1?1<*<^ ^ ^ " îtif
^4f4Pl4K^ = frfft: SR iUf?fT II Il
4K<i,ufi
^^414.1%
trgirajft-
to ô ^:5*>1*Tireit <T<> 40 \
ft =W:
JJo 3ffo
^^ \ ^ gq^t qff% 3. II
â^ff fîiTT ^^J ?*1 i II \ Il
90
EXTRACTS FliOM MANUSCRIPTS
^1|+1<1^ \ ' [-] 5^*4><| * ^WI^spTTR" Il *$ Il 3TW 4JFf^*^^^:1^||^^^ ^ : # V-HW? I 4T=(Ml< I <He!M<]4 4rfc : \ %\\: \\: 1| fm% sM4lf?l<:
-^ NHJjuiHii^'iî ^^ rrat tt 5tn<ii-HiRî?TT: ^ R^^^jor^j^^f ?^:^|^|^:
i<-\\-\UP & ^)^1 fTFT R?4 :^ ^^ ' ^^^^ ^+î
* rr ^1^ ^tr% % Il \ Il
JTo ô q- 3fr? 1^ d4=*4J-4ul4 II
?t :^f:^Kul4<)uU4, H
tfo *3<11!??" I
^ ? 4+1*1 1N=)I<44 t fw^t

' T^T: WJT ^ ? TT: 5^Ît^KlHWfl '|[<^1*<11<1 & Mw4CtfH 4RrPT fU^Cl' *+<>^: ?^: 11<1
: 0 % Ft^ * 1+^: t 1 r
cflT4H4<4 3fNT%^rrcfftg 4) ^^ TJ^r^-j ; f% ^+1 "% |1'*! *)] ITcT Tc Md44K4eUR(:) : ^^^^1*?1151^'^ ^^ TIÎK I <? f: H4W^TIHyTh ^-^ '.'^ 4W
$ : ffl^PT: ^RTf^T < ^r+MT c#T

STfqcT JRcfif RPT: Il %f - * 5TW II
; \< # ?% ^ nrct g i
91
*(*: ^ II \ Il H t tfcpJkRbllH ITT

'WMl(|+K: frfacT:
II Il
*!* I \ I + I air^Sw^KWfa+KH<HI<U I "^^

4=*HH4+K+K4 I f*Fnl%FITCrm\m i
^5^>-1^ i ^^^^ I PkHMtH4HiK I ^+Jritl I flf^W3=fKIKfT I
^<*=|*+.. i ajiî<yciy^wyf i '^^ftiît4fifc4J 3tf"S" I S^Kirf^JcRI^Wl-fTR* I

1$ I * I ++ ^r \
%fll^4l<Tl J":
^ ^1|1^<14
^% r il cn?Rr<^prt^t^4îK i<wi
rcT _
4-
iiîi ; \ sn% \8*

9o f : *3) Il II
% hmî t-îf:
%3f | %4Nd<44=ri 4llj|||d cT^RT fe": cTF: $f -
fiT 4d4lRR|J%fl-tfRrKfa3 TfcTRN 4gt: 5-: T4T: Il

=%< f#: ^3^crV4yW*rw(#: &) f^s H
^5<^^<^*^^^<}1 II \ Il
TCFPft fenifi^ II
92
tfo 1| : tffsi II
^0^1+<1^^:^^1: I
5lH+rfl+rtl4yRd <sr^"f^T=fr I
* ifacrr Pflrc wer qrWl <\ | '^'^ CRT II II
^ *?&f? : ^ Il
44<TMlJclH4H4**mK: 4><1<: 4*11=1 $IM*i<Nl4: *f^ ^Tlt ( : ) anfftTcrcr4Wifiicl4l<i" "<1|1-
haiii<
: i ^;
to J:ftf 44 II \\\
fr ^^qefl^J|e^HH4^HKH4<âl^^<^4Hd<H^PTElcH<Rl4*EMI*ll *rlMUHf+lJ# d^l<fiHIMl 1*4M4<i4*4^4pl^44 ^ ': ^' 3*0 4
^' e'^^HHHcnriflrlWîi^l^r^T1!! II
^^: II
ifl{Mc4H<facr: ffcT: ^^^ I
Sfr%W ITcT 5=TRTcPsft: Il \ Il
dHHn*^l*4<mul: 4=% p"-
^^-\{\11<$^ II II
^^'M^fa+Wi 4HHI MM-Hri^l^: I
*H*il4*WM4Hif": Hk^sH Zt^ Il ^ Il
*ftm% ^^^^**!^: II II
4t d dflH 4 H t R < lylfcJqf^lfc^r: |
*? T SRcftC rqffaT^F: cHWc]^: Il 4 II
^44ld4AI444KWI4*IH I
?: sfV4"di^TH <i < "I N It *fnT4T43Tfft: Il S. Il
5%%7^: MMtM-sl'IcfhfcblflcNl:-
% ^ H 3 t '%^?% I
Mt4T=T MtîRR^rtAII'u*! *n>Wn?r
%fl<Ntll>? 4ft5R5ftlte^ Il * Il
'^' ( 4I44RK-4: [l:] I

[rtfc] ^: * [# [=4] q^Tfsn: t444W<44JJ||Ru|: II Il
t^=HtH^|pTT <*HU<ik II ^ II
3J*4F^4J=KW 1^44,1
ffAiHfarer tH<Ht<tHc1: I
^**=|^ R-w4liKra4i^4i
*< <fam <il4l^ | \
tHHrtAMN4H<l#r^ RRdtr?^: I
4*HKij fofaU4llf: #:*?5%: II U M
94
EXTRACTS FROM MANUSCRIPTS ACQUIRED FORQOVERNMENT.
cTWT \\ (:) ?T3 f^T^T: Il \^ Il
* 1M<MH %# ? SR- II M
RrfrfaT: I 4^rat ^11|-1 ?1%% I
TTfTTFraWiT: T^RT: II \ II
^ ^%= ? wn4 i I ^w il II
*!<' fax^:
^ jjpi^ y
'*^ ^ 1% II II
MWr^^T # %\ ^MdWHId
iTMrfsq" RiT '^ fef : || < ||
^^*5 4T*t 51
^rircw iffafft " 5#"- II
TKluld?lfcnfl4t)Hî
: ||
EXTRACTS FROM OODEYPORE MANUSCRIPTS.
II ^fPFtWT 44:
angfcftf !1 ^r
^ w^f^rgîTRTig- ^"[:]
^' ^ %[0 +1,
u%^[fre^lT4i%4 [-: ] %irp.
$+1(1"[?']^' ^rtw "^; II
$^ 4ihh4W4i4 ?^ ^,
T4T#t TTf<T ^1| :
?*^ rf^ ft%nTfl" HWrfRTT:
^^TT^fc |^
Pr5^ HI4I4N:
1|411 h
dlctfHul4.
$<?5MIHl4
'
&\: Il
<l34=HTl4IHl4 h
^RIWI:
ntSSTNJIHW II
^- r^ct^R-^ II
*%1 H+Hc1lft4i R+^f II
?5^ iFif% #%" ft**iMi4Hi4 ir
CRT'
fcT Aiwififr:
fiar ^1+)
95
96
EXTRACTS FROM MANUSCRIPTS HE LONGING
?f 7?#:||
mewfravii
<y<fl$H4l+R*iHWn: Il
f <=fl^RT4": Il
ffi 5TR7?q": Il
fr 1<1 Il
1 m
: *
f 461^16: Il
ft t Hra-ll^ Il
^^+^: ": Il
fr ^^^; il
# U^HNiq": Il
*llfo3 fimiKH^g; Il
HHH4>*4: [><:]
^: Il
: Il
f- 4^44**4: Il
STRl^: Il
snwfrojpj": ||
?^$*: Il
?1<T ftirf^rfqrrq' : Il
51% STSPPiHWI^JN : Il
ff <Nf : Il
[ [] )'l+*4: Il
4,1 1, Il
CT RTRTH *HIHIH II
(4HFTH $.
a|?l^ll+^l II
5T?kKfa4.<yi II
^^: Il
d^M+^l II
TO H. H, THE MAHEN4 OP OODEYPOBE,
97
*T4Nf**i II
<fr fa ] ?1 \ [itsnw] fe&m-.

4&WW4m:
HMN: Il
%: PTT: \\
Mkfcm
: Il
: N
T^Fft i ^
yy^l^R: Il
a^sfl-HHMN: Il
RF4R: Il
)4rfû|MI4: M"*
r-> *^
^44.KNI+Î II
^T3P# <l'|R*IM*Hicl M
^: H
^^ H
1: Il
Wlf4IM+) [Allfayqid+] : 11
?*5^ Tf^- ^^ 41<-<^ mm ( gf ) ^ ^ %khh ^^^

anhî ipFT g^T \^
Affair [cTt? ?;]^ #* ;
|*1^1^<*11^ II
4?ll44l5?41<14H4tHlcfHl {jn]
il &f% W il
98
EXTRACTS FROM MANUSCRIPTS BELONGIH

,y
^^: || ^ ||
^\ ^^ I
*fm\ mt\ ^; .
#%^<<1 ** .
[] 44: %": ^^^: I
^%": CrfwWltilPT: II II
W $ + I
:1'4!1 ^tFT (! II II
* ^44ii1d4i%J^r^t : I
WT *^. KT RltTR": 4dl4=iK II * M
3T%5raRpffiTPj; fftT4Rritfr<t ;
sprVHHMW : AWcHdi: Il
<4>< FT = *i<<Kdi II
^ ^: S3^T ":
*
f- % 5^: ?: II
^Rwjd T%: ml" fr^r%4T5Fr: Il
#rr rj $ d4l=frui . il
+1<' ts4Rt ^^ II
1.^|^ +|^1 II
1*+14 %l4MNI * MMWJd II
(Tf =: g^T %TWdtdW : Il
+131% ^^ " ":
RT 51 4^T ^
\\ \ ^ <\! J^JcT: II
TO H. H. THE MAHRNA OF OODEYPOKE.
99
^Ji $| 4|M4>l4Wdlil%: Il
^% FRfa flT'tJ4'^ ^^ Il
* %& ^^ HfUbUWH W4^\l4\ [

TPT: : Il
? 1 +1 ^ h
3WRT?ff RT4^M<HR|H>KI<: Il
& <\\ WT: Tfctf%T: Il
iT?Rtt WH II
d^4iH4M ?? II
fi ^FT^P ^^ ^ JTSTfmw^ 3ralJ|l4lr2: Il < \ 3TSt=5< ttW rpRTRTr^ KRTRTFg^Tft H
ôoo II
\o\ f W 41
Il *flj|UlN :
apr q- [f] iT?jTTirrv;jjR' |?1^:
mtz 1 ^ w ^% i
^ ^^-: ^ 5^ 1 Il
<r jsw^h TT^4.i^wdlsi=ilij; il
Ztffm ff irf^fr II
4R7% * fUT <J*% HWTff [*]<msr[>]sfel4": Il
]00
EXTRACTS FROM MANUSCRIPTS BELONGING
fstfR '<1 UHMdtfMH: Il
CRUT g?fPR4R II II . V*\

IR- %o fa l\ 3TO | 40
Il 3TR 44: Il

<rti4%^: < gf =h<unN=ih II
1#1|| Wt ll+44N^d II
rat ^ ? ^r i^
fW#4T^^Fq TRR iFfif^T: Il
SR 4H+|i| iRTS^t 1 4M-llfa pfrreTFt <dl^<u]
^rf^ra^^TR: Il
iPT %t 1+ g^R^R II " II
3T*r*3t II
rit " %? ^ \
41<1 . to ^
II " Mtokiw :
=%<12<1 * tfi^NfolcifarihPt. II
>3 =: fit - ntci %5% [:] Il \ II
*WR >R4RfR 3%TW
pRR^TRf ^; ^^ ^: il ^ 11
SR #Rf3|Rl ?rt^|^f4l4 - TR: Il II
!=114,<: [T:] Il
TO H. H. THE MAHENA OP OODETPORI.
101
fl'IMI^'mnHqlfr < { II
(* ' < WJt- Il
5[?] ^#1^ ^T^ST ^ II
$ 4WH $$$ II
PUlf# cift ^^ Il
^ 3<NI^<l4R<j.lt #W^T FTHT [] #o \^ * ,
fr^f^
4U^: ^\ fa I aro ^
Il %flJ|>RlN -. II
;^<<: I
^^\^^ : \
C<d=htf*II^KH'44'lcH 4IRT^TRT4#rRt ITSR ^RTR-: Il \ Il
ifRfT
^t
PT4#[Rrtl #^ fct W Il
^T
flW TEITET: ": Il
^ : Il
m% \$.u % zmrs ^ gift ?p^ -
rffiHI*,: ô $o \ ayo ^
^ cffaft ^rpcpmjmiA ^
f^TRTjf $ (# R)4rf: Il
MUl44yi<HHt<|!Ue||4) II
.'^ ^HPT ^: Il
102
EXTRACTS PROM MANUSCRIPTS BELOMOINQ
" - Il
WFl \$%% #
^ ^^ Irwrrsfiff-
j^4pHf%dl II o ^ | ^
II ^^^: II
: [] &mw J ^ ||
^>< J ^gqfrfcig^
ffr fCFTEraifcTTCT 5HR<*Ht f|4fll*mirtiT4 ": II"'
?#
WcnTSfWFPT
f
Rc^lbHK: HW:
l
fr^mnrrar W f W aro 3
II ô II %^51 44: II
%IHdKîr^FT^rgr: +1<<1^:
^NPJI^d'Juu4HR^4.^T: RT I
4lWla+ri|cy^xHU|4w gji^NWIK4*II: TCT srqfcT ": [>] ftfrTTO: gtft: Il \ II
IFPT dg-dHI4l T [it] TST ^<||^^ I
qwfrtR37?"R"f%^- *W g"T^tft|M4HI4;i| x
5fl *J % frrr: Il Il
ffcT ft fft ]?^ 1 ^! II
P"*fiyHrll \ \3 ^c
Il %5 :
^wTsfgrrgTTTR^"
n \ il
II
TO H. H. THE MAHKNA OF OODEYPOEE.
StsTSTT
108
il
d^fdiH^riT fcftq" ^r ^^; Il ^ Il
\$. t *ft f^FRTSpnTftffcnTTCl I -* :
ten Wo ^ ^ ^^ ?<^^<1>
->< r^f^ II \ Il
fRW \\ II < Il
^<ijyR"i ti<iî4^r i
<*5^ RMrh^l5llHl4riq^" Il II
fnfN?T5THi **?11 I
^ ^||^1#; ^
< ^WTTPfWWrnT II ô H
4Kf\4
^^^
: Il \ Il
wm W4 imr < akhhi-
^RTT^m^ snrr^yfdl II
Il 3||f4HMTT; M
^ sf *$ <=<1% 5^ ^ ^m : "TT^: Il
104
EXTRACTS FROM MANUSCRIPTS BELONGING!
ft 4lJ|H*4H % WW II
% 3PTPIWfr II
II
: II \ II
sTSraTH: II II
fl'NW^M. II H
ilH\ W&4H>4. II II
<-<1 ^!. II II
*1*.
4#Hr. II II
55[1. II II
TFfrfr. II ^ Il
*HlfeJ4l<?4H. Il\ II
=3TWf. II H II
4HtMM. II \ i'
fiKIMW. II * II
^. Il \8 II
arftarir. Il \ II
<. \* n
ftpaftT. II V II
II \
\*s44[4. \^ II
^". II 0
^+. II \
^^^. II II
TPTf-dHHm. II \ II
^rareFRPT. ^
+-. II $. i'
^. 48
. Il V I'
^^^ II ^
*te34Tr4 * M ô
TO H. H. THE MAHARANA OF OODEYPOBI.
1*1 1 II II
**. Il V* Il
%11<1. Il ^ Il
II : II
*1 : *%< II
TRPT RFR7IR 5^ II
: II \ II
3TcPr[qt]5Mtî4 \
^.
|^<.
4T?fr ffcM44.KI. II II
sftaw ?^. $
^ 1)^. II II
41. ^
H<*4+KI. II \ ||
^+w. U
3fR<jiR'i4'+Ki. \
yîy- 41 4*=I^4<N AA-ilo II \ II
$& ^ II \\
%. II V*
if^qfrT. Il V I'
. II \^ II
^. II ^ ||
105
106
EXTRACTS PROM MANUSCRIPTS BELONGING
iNluiliJ-TWrftifr. II 44 II
4^l"IHId+l4+HJlHPR". II 4
^^. \V II
+. II 'I
mR+i"ii 1-+1*. x^ il
*TC"MK4+reffaW. II V H
W% 5T^f?4H44illHH. II ô
^<^<#. Il 41
^^1+. Il
3T%rTf^lTRrRfnTq". Il 44 Il
im< in *?. ma n
Hiiyfew+reRpr. 44
aid^lM+IHW. Il 4^ Il
-'+. m v* il
iffli|M<l4+liHnT. Il v H
if^H+KMmtHq': Il 4^ Il
fa*4ft44<MAI': ÎK^H * H yo H
**+1. \j\
*14". Il 94 II
<4+i4i. n a n
M^KI^+RT. Il 84 II
firi*4+l4l. Il B* Il
*+1 a*
1(. Il 4% Il
?f% fhj^W4RiRR : Il 4 Il
Trîft mm
TO H. H. THE MAHKNA OF OODEYFOBE.
107
II ^^; Il
^ tRTSttl' %*|+**31 II X II
f- %^<^|+^11 [] <**1$! ft[]
5^<1$^*^|*44|+<||^1-$ ' R^- -+: : II < \\ II
^ ^^ i
3H-dUslW^ < II \ II
^^ <*1+<35 II
m W- fFR ifti ^: Il
H^wR^RdNiO rwti^RTrarrtt II
fU 144,^44, iRPTCtft RtT <*3 sFFPTTfr II
3<iMAII< " [%] 3^% :
Til" fhTT^ '<11: : FSRH
ft *# ^" ^ RcR ft'KleirraH: Il
?|# ^"^^" ^^'^ Il
H4ifdi ^ rr ^tf%ft ^r^fq- 4lfT II
$\4 3R qifcwrffftf qfq- ^ff T%c: Il
fqjT $=[] +4rt|+<l4^1+<^r ; il
^^lA^rtMvart^tb^RlîîKHi/tliiai^KluiKNfrcsft Rîuiaftqjfea" ft ft ||0< ^< Rctr^fi4fad*fl<W4^4l^4lft<44MUT ?w h^j ; II
\y
WRT^TTo
<J<|JM II \ Il
TSFRtsR f^Xlufafafr *3 I
f^r %^^4^^5^1|(^
45Jfc ft4il)KfTRf4T Pm^r
*f crtePfrfc:
nTT: Il
II 44. Il II
108
^ own rht f^ ^'biPi41d

d tilico tT
ip
3: ifwg
II
R"2T t ^? #$WR^ ^ Il \ Il
fr 1|^ filley[4drtH
ffrT <1KlR4HM<04)4AHH ?1|[<+**
14><1{ ^qieHri Il
%fl$*4^M*l4*4J<W^ ^4HJe4 =flfttt!l^
frt %*1*11 ^^rf 'iPRfni

4l<Rltfaf<fadl WI [f]^?^" 1
%<<"1 -4)i?IN|J|
++<"1 f qra^raiiVMi
fir grqrwTr +<+<
\^ sf (^ rrerr
wMiiiiPpifcr
ôc tfo \\ > ê ^

$huhi*><; wrarft*fc 4"o ^ (fo \ II %flft4IHH4: II
444i'3 ta4<rft#: Il \ Il
TO H. H. THE MAHENA OF OODEYPORE.
109
^ ^. ^ q-o \\oqo \ 4,
II sftiTo ||
ô
trtRTR'^-'rqTffsr:!!
Il
5 ft4F7ift4<H<^ x^+^citl p^Tiit II

3 ano ^4d*W*|u: ^ \$o q\a \ ajo
ô
II \ Il
^4 43T?*Pifgwfr *HHIKft": :
*3l4+fT 5FT5SR4rM II
II
sf 4'eKfsiii4<N^riTAlR<{ %"-^PTCRnw q f^"i 4ei<4-
\ q-o \ 8
U4IÎ fRlT ^^^
^ 4iiT^<H^^Hrbjr=iti^+4rifto5îfhTi^^ ^4.^4-
^4*": ^ M to \ aro
3JJO
^.
>&11 ^ II
TO'iHN' 4Î4lT : ^ II
gfteiypy *r^ ij-o 4, aro a\

! fnr i i $<<4 ?p
31 4cll+U: 4$: Il
EXTRACTS FKOM MANUSCRIPTS BELONGING
fN<*>l": c To *% o ^ \
*'1"1 44":
To ÎN" gw ^ ^" 4U: !&: il
aif*l"j: \o 40 ^ to ^ aro ^
\o ario ^^ #Mîft
st44f*l": \\ T 4\ to * 44
\\ air ^ i^Pr 4HIuMc| Ifg qifcRf
fcf ^4^<^îu^yi^?r^ftîftbir4r=i<% fw-
eq^KcMUJH^ \^ V*o if ^
. ^ w# *ngt?rcr
II & : II
' 44fUU ^ Il
H. H. MAHHNA op oodeypokk.
1*1" \3 TO ^ 4 V{
\. ^
il Sp ":
^4>luJ4, \ ^ f aro '\

Il Vfrfo II
\tf ^^+^'^':
jpt rrf?r%# cI^flFr HWH: II
Jn^?r
'4fref44IH^ Il
Ill
^^
^^.
'.
%rf.
vao
\ ^^^
,
^1^1-5'?5
.
V
^^
^^
Vooc
'-
\\\
u \
rrT^?:
XX 5TT4rt| > -
*<^|1:
M
X*<*
% ;
\ 3TT*irnrmr:
v .
XU
*
#^
^:
...
XV >ve
3i%
>
s
xxx
4*
V4V'
<io
^TS"^*.
<?
xx
\%
Tft^r
TI 14
..
X*
M XIX'
XU
3V
3?-#%T?^TT^l^:
* tttfv?
W4K:
trm:
xx^
Vc
V4
* ***'^^farr-
^PWPsrwftfreiT
* ;^*'|^?1 AM * I
* ^Frrwnfarnm:
1 00
4o
75:
...
... 1
00
114
LIST OF MANUSCRIPTS
^-
JIWiyW+IR'.
t.
<*1|<8
*)-<?^rt:
37RpTPT:
gT^frCrRTT:
SfTiWt'NfarcPlfafa:
|*11:
CTT^Sf:
T"IlW^-
dW*i tNT
: irf:
yi^tffW':
^nf^r^Tfm:
tillR^ ...
^:, *.
V*4
<
*V
VW 44
V$oo
eôo
o o o
w
\*\
+ *
8T^
at -
* VW
:
fSPT^T: T^
3V
Veo
-#.
ri^rTfra':
^|**141:
^cr^f%|T%:
^:
*
V
^"^':
?^:
V4 {"!'^:
*141<: T1 ^74?-
4*
*
4
4*
V*
\\
:
^||?:
^ :
w ^*
%^17?:
v* ''*?
-
*IHrMH4lrtl
Xo
^tfrfr-'ifrT-
Vi*4
!
44
ô
'...
ftTgcT:
iH?^=
!
I
...
ftRrN <{* I --94i^. J>-*rat^:

?|:
... I
-I w
... i
v>
w ... I V!00
i
tTSTTJ^mPr.
* : (! ..
<ft *>*
41 5^
\.
&1: frfiT:
ôo
V
\\
3.
W^^t^RTTI
^:
q^TT^*'-!?!^
|
j^RT:
^ <htrgn<idtonfl
^^^^^
41
V
7>:
^
IV
<<
-,
''^^^
fa^: ...
*?:
^+.^^"!.
"5#5:
| ^^"^
*TfiTH%r
Con
^-^1*
\ ^3Wtf4?=
II
I*
14
II
I
xiv
^ oo
rV
I
VR
?Y
^ ^s^^-rff^r^rjprsT.
W4I
tit.
vi
Y **?:
''''
I ^
N + IrtHTT^T^fRf^
<
X ^^
^^
fsrwfaft ^rr
I
êvv
V
\
'
*l
XI
Yoo
\
^4
116
LIST OF MANUSCRIPTS
*\
^ + ti
. fl^3.
W:
!
<*M44Î*<4<HW*)4:
* SITTf^^TT
fHhft^^^
Vôco
RH*?::
^1*<^*1<'1. . . flT^:
'i
^-^.
*-^
Veo.
4*1 WH :
"
Hlf^H^H.
V9
Vi
\\
^WT^rTr^
4H
': ^
\\ WsfHf
5PT:
^T'iirP-:
\ ^: 3?T4p?T(r
\\
va
V
*
'^^
RTfarre-rrf^TTw
jg^^
ve
^:
^.
''wwin,<iwg<ih T4dd'^444H-=J4.
V"
v^

HIW
117
iWrjd+lPl.
<. *. \:
4$ *-
^.jtwtMt ^.
TITr^qvr^TCrri?^
!1|?*?%1?KHwkHT
^':
\ STT5frfWM4L
W 5
VW ovo
frrf%f-
^^^^^
Voo
v<
^^'
>>-;
^)
: ...
4ftW*:
^ ...
^^
. 4*l*lrt4)*KII<lH<?M*n-
... ! 4$"
\\
X
Vi
... *
w*
TSHu^yiNWl
\\\ ^ 3FTK4I* :
!*
\V*4
?:
\Soeo
118
LIST OP MANUSCRIPTS
''-
mffr. 4^ ?t^T:
' 4>=r.
TPTfRrtHlicfiflT
4#^:
' V
\* TPTOJJPi.
44
*
fWfTHr^.-
'5>*-^-'?%C-*lrtdKMhC
\\
^*!
^^:
Xv \
%^: ...
44^*|W(4.
<<*1^, HR^f
*
IVU4.
^^RtIRP:tTHf^T:
^rru^sprr
4f'KslH4^|i(:
=^57: <ft-
4tTTT7,JN':
5^*2 AI
...
V*X
XX4 V4
4XV
1*|.
P \
<.*fiAf"<*IIP<1:
<<*|5=
^5?^:
...
111:
...
XX
*<
*
v*4 *
'.
V,
XV4
V
TT^S^T1^
ipra^Rir0?!^. . .
XV
-:
X4
^-
il4 ^
\\
\\\
-4lf^:
+ IIAMI4":.
^^
1]9
rWT4?nFTft.
q^ri%. *
^.
#^: 4% .
I W
^^
TtpT
^:
V !T
^"rf^M-îRrarr [
\\
* ^:
\\
\% U*\M\<k\<^ y'NcMirt
'." iHûl-=IKrlTI4cb<4u-^^gpT
V>4 f?^THi^4>s[t%^
V
TKI|4s
M
4,ev ?*3"1^
\* ^^^"
W I f^M-1+l^w
^*s ^''
4Vo
4S"F4<:
-.
ê tsrT^rc. rt^rn.
V
IT: t
\*\ %?* 4RP4.....

V NtST^TT
14
^?:*: ...
"
VR ?1'*<<!*.
5 ftf^WM+4.
"<v 5^'^^':
120
T.IST OF MANUSCRIPTS
^.
4nft.
WT. TH
5? 4iJ4<luir
ê f*IJJ<l44[.
4<|^
\\\
\\\
3ot
Wt
\<\
\\* ^^^
\\\ ?^-tfNrq.
\\\ tftsrfp*:
\\\ ?1<"=|}*{*.
^^:
^rr^Rfr--
w
rTl
HPT:
\e
':
44
IpmT:
^<: ^"^''-.
T-îrrHTff 51^:
\\\ *):
ww
w
4<ilH*l4*4er
^^^-^
Rrir îT>q^31
vv WV
*[$( ....
4V
V.
\*
121
*.
('*1.
^PKffW:
. $_.
Sffan
4t -
MV\
1 ...
HII4,J-*iriT,T4:
4S BTftY4tfrft4n
^?^
tTT>T?:
*$w-
^ ?
4M
:'M"
V\\ MW 4
V4
ooo
4M
Um.
W
V*
4M Iff fRrffTirYlTfTfl- ...

4M wi-hakNum" toniftw-
TT
5TFTR??:
MS
M
M V>44
V.V
Me
44 M* Mee
iTPT:
l'-'ll^
44
MV
300
44V
4
*<
4s
4V %^%5--^
fH^r-riy^fr. ^1<|4,^|**|^1<*|**iw.
ffleWî
Vooo
^^ ?.
^^:
\^\9
mv
MV
4*
''?
122
LIST OF MANUSCRIPTS
#4?fw-
sfflâtcWft.
irffr.
Tîf*r. H^. ??
rlfii j)rirfil^r*r
je
W V ^4
v<
Vô 3t<f>K
\4 w^t
Mt^trlstilR.
w
Wo fRW-
t wfrars&wfr:
Wo -
wqftfo tfo fapfw-
Wo WTo f3r*rc-
to tfo JfWfrwcwfbi:
fts:?.
<T5.
3WTCV tffarw
wo WTo 44TJ:
r t0 nTWlSf:
^^
v^
4U
4V ^1^^^%-
444L
4V
êTfqW \.
w fH4-
vv
T^ft:
T ^^^
im^^t ^?:
... ...
...
fcHj4wR:
wa
oo
IMShlH.
V OOQO
123
ACQUIKED FOE GOVERNMENT.
^fNu^+ifr.
44lf*T. ^r.
?^:
.-
^
$rt|j-=HtfKW
^ :
45^r?:
frTH*|-4l:
fTTTtTfR:
^'':
"^1-:
^ ..
5*Y
4e
3V
3oo
44
\*v WW
vw
e* \\%
r* w
\\
4<
...
^"to^tJ"
^Wfrfrlr^r
>:,1':-"1(5??:
<-^
W
\
V*
...
V3
WS
000
3Y<t
^4TfTH
'.
5b*H5n(Um
^^
HpffgWnW^T-
*^.\
*
^
w*
...
Vo 00
W4
...
w
r*^rftrf<H5^ni:
4.4Y
':
w
vy
^00
''ft :
^,:,^^11^':
w
...
33
124
LIST OP MANUSCRIPTS
$4^4-
ST'fr'Hrlilli.
Hf..
v^
* Vtt
\o
''^-
...
^v
fNTjuiqfrg^STW4*lul4pi:
519
vw
V">
*R*ja4R.\..
...
R\ ^'^tflT^ : . . . **^:
...
ô
^wo
W
4W
V
^'" frTTlHr
^^
u*^4^q^# ,5 <
*1.
^^:dfe\
^So
^-
^**
*%. *-.
Hri^RiR:
w
4ar
w
%
<15< ffbry<lulhf ^*: ...

rKQ faiT.
Vt V44
v*
4*1
4&4
rrfo
4TTrbff
x*e
HfWCT^
TTftT
TT
TT
*^?
5';%:
nrTfirpR':
" V*
irr ^\^
,
\\\
qf^sTTPr^fff
irr
*
^
5PTTVTT:
... ^Vooo
*
ô
125
MfaTOTTft'.
*tfr.
. rnn ":
< -
4lRSI4Pr4lR<w|T?r nr \
4f3*4uitiJift

aw^r^^fft
IT \\\
+ |<Wl^-rf
rrr ^
<515^
\-,V
J^mnffb
<^H44ii4+<.^4.
HHI4^Hid + l4 + <u|^*
^*:
Iterar:
WJ 000
500
^S ;$:3 Rfaf^
Vft
*<*1 t-
HHWKW::
Nif
44
4W)<*44'*T4*d<*4 d*
4* PnTf^l^RTTtfSfT
SRrtj>tmhRj-
5ooo
4^
4
arofa
126
LIST 0 MANUSCRIPTS
SâwrPr.
RH ^^
q^rrl^r. tfa^. ":
... I H
:
W*
fspremrcW
iT4FPT^Rrr%iT
^^''4-
'
fftTCHR:
^ ill ri f' :
W^-ÎH'HIÎT:
^^'"!*
VVV
W
W
41^.:
4ci|chf4^[44L
W
I
Wooo
Yoo
127
^Hytrt+iR.
4TfJt.
q^rfa. .
'':
VVoo
f*PTWT=
' tiffir-
*F5.
<^-^:
'-
*4
<1''
T^^JT
^4ftg-4"lttii44_
^fHTîrct^^
(^^
4'll:
TT ^v
TT
ITT
3'4|<IHif!4i:
TT \\o
4*4^(rfOf^
*^
^
ir \\ (^:
^00
228
LIST OF MANUSCHIPXS
<.
. Ntf:
^^ \\
StV
\\
"
=
i
V
^-^
'ir W*
^^'
ggiyilf^cr^T)l
\*>\
,
*M4 \\\%
H 4" 14.|o
sprotw." -..
niT=Kg.R:
4THf|cr.
^^*:1?:.
fi^nR-H1-&.
--^**
\\\
w* \w
VW
4*<<
4TT%?3RPf-
4o
fbnr^R':...
v*^
R:
3\3
4rt(+1*^0'*fi4T*
3W
3^
;: ;-.
^)^^
*:
^"
3fq%Wt:
'!,
4^qt:
?'1''^: . . .
^^^
tfrtfaiHTCafalT
4(r[W444% -^\
^^
frsg??:
? 5:
129
ACQIBED FOR GOVERNMENT.
aNfagirarft.
fr.
. &; ?*
^H^ft: ...
\\<
\\\
Vf
\TO
TO
*
|4<*^:
ft:
121
TO
TO
TOS
VW
TO fa *t i i%%4nrr-?N^"^T 5Jlr*<ft:
TO H4i4i+HHt #ra>r:
4,e W\
ôoo
TO Hr
4'
^.
WW
TOR
f^mTwPT:
TO
ôo
ôo
4ff44u'ritfit<:
UV Vi-^R-fH. *
& 111.
*>*<:
130
LIST MAKtrsCKFTS
^1<:*1^.
Pcit,
' SPI. 1*
:
2T4WTfTft
*V ^^-' ...
'loto
5*^^!:
^TTTfHfH: tf
4WI"Hl<IW4.
4^
^%
w
W
UM
4L ir
^^^ ...
^-:...
*w
5^31^:
V<^ ^:w^Tn*
*!<,:
*:
* W" W
...
131
ACQUIRED GOVERNMENT.
^ll4(WT*ift.
4Trfr.
^- \ tiVt; ":
4$
^-
*4|d|4lffl ^T
^:
\*
^TCafrT:
4^'-H4HrH:
5ffl4-^<l6!*iJ
iT*4ui4i*ffnre3frr: .
\^:
^:
Vô
^'^^^'. ....
[*
tjTHi|-<CI?:
^:
-,
44"l4{rffaTTfo
414^44^1
arfr^frPr: ....
^^^:#
:
^!?:
?<'
f.
>-*|*1?1<*rfarr. if <4frl

V ^"1<*1
w
as
vu
-4J^:
St^fr:fir
^
|<Htfor
Rkm *d fil *Mrr*rf!?: -w <
*Ht
Yooo
;
Hfl4rf*'^f!
1^*
4^
:-..
4v
... \ôoo 341*1441"
THT
5^:
132
LIST Of MANUSCRIPTS ACQUIRED FOR GOVERNMENT.
$N!K<Hlft'
4>tlt.
erfa
nd 41.
7^. . ?^:
l
\\
5^5
400
4*UuM4fMMt*lrt-
\\\ tffar
...
R4ulJsft54b|uKHJ
<o
"4=17:
Vf
|îfarei:.
>..
e^
CATALOGUE OF THE PALM-LEAF MSS.

IN
aNTINTH'S BHANDR, CAMBAY.
( 2
/_ <| Z.*%
< )
II
0 9
of *^ r
1
1
or
0
J'
ur
1
1
y or
nr
1
>
>
> X
uf
m-
( 4 )
tr'
%
to
I
' 00 ~
>,
^ 9
m

J - P
.2'
^*
.
Se.
i .5 .
*-
3
5
5
ti
<1
' *
&
llfilfl
'
-ct:^ t fer 'E|r ^ (C7^ ^
( 5 )
( 4 )
ti
-te
to
V
V
<w
me>^
a~
X
e^
cr

. 9 S
S .3
V
<
0
CS
a g-1
vr
UT
3 SP
mr
nr
<r
<y
V
e^
"P
fe
3
3
if &f B
StfR*t
* il -i'i il i g
'S-ic E
o
4
( 5 )
* fe fr 9 "Il
ff*
to 'S 4# ? <fe
( v
( ? )
( 8
F
I
?Il
& 1 .i c
tr F
( 10 )
m
-M
to
ST
I
1
-Tg
"
to "
OP
'
tr
?5
( 11 )
?
V
9
(V
*-
os
.
-
b3
s-
I
s
12 )
( is )
* Vf
te tr
rr
IT
: ;

: -
S-
% i
&
>
0
1
14
15 )
-
I
( le ;
I? )
.
9
!
1 or
-
>I
( 18
^0
2 .5
01 *E
(
a'"*
>
9
V
*s
OD
?.-
( 19
If
e
vr
9
I
>0 2
>I
4 er
( >
ir
( 20 )
Ja
la
I
4f
s le3
< g .

5
<
1-1=
fr te
<E,fr
fe
=_
: fe t? feb-f | * Efe
1!1!1
4? < E if
Hlillifllili
&II fe^f El<E Ic
< J
i fe lI
> * te Ir TS- <E fr
( 21 )
9
I
( 22 )
IV
Si
E u
. 0)
OD
_
2- g < .
IV
IV
<1
fe
23
te'
I
IV
>
2>
i
rv
( 24
S
s
a
Cl
*- .
5S.S'
*-
( 25 )
(
J-
0
J-
>
>
or
(
<r
'
1
*
V
1 1 I !:
fr, (t /
fer (5: ( -
ill. L
h> ,= fei & -5 /
(D
( 26 )
to
S S g

J
5
ci
<
fe
o
o
>
1
fcJ
27 )
( 28 )
( 29 )
tr'
'IF
m-
*
'
" *
< :
>
UT
>
( 30 )
( 31 )
32
( 33 )
4fe
>
0
*
--
>'
"
>
ur
.
I
1
IS
<
>
)
irr
cr
is-
( 34
( 35 )
>
V
f*r
f-
*V
(
*-
1
(VW
o<-V
<r
or
>
>
u<-
V
9
0
1W
ur
>y
of
36
tr' fc x
I
'ill II
& fe * ir
( 37 )
(V
S!
Us
( 38 )
te
to
-3
.S"
. 5
o S
2
4)
te *,
te 'S
ss- t I
( 39 J
m-
e
mi-
*'
irr
1
e
<r~
>
<* <""
J'
%tr
A
0
%
Or"
s
S3
( 40 )
to
o t .
i?
s
2.
ci
fe
il
i
IP
fr
<
&
&
of
*
V"
L
(-
0
>
"
.1 .
-
*-
eS
1V&S
42
5
2 .2
ff'
* /fe fc *
|?'- tr ti
( 43 )
i
5 er
> >
tr.
44 )
ft
f
i
a~
i
.S e
5
r>
( 45 )
i*-
>
46
<~0
BD
q
CJ
-^
~ ^
I
ft
<1
a
03
( 47 )
4* S
fr' fr
F I
Îfj
( 48
tu
<
i2" .2
g .
| ft
s
S
A
I
a
-1
'
49 )
W fe
- "to
50 )
51
er
of
fc-.s''
.J
Il
ja
0
-i
52
53 )
if
( 54 )
:
UT
5 _ '
>
<
fe
( 55 )
if
>
&
a
IV
>>
%*
56
4
S
*
V
-
Sg
3
. g
S
J-
fcj
( 67 )
I
1
or
UT
( as )
6
ta
<
'
-4-)
0)
^2 .2
--
I
5
_ </
1
I
t? 1^*
"&
fc -
'S tr
* - "S>= &--'
I i 1__6
( 59 )
( 38 )
ta
<
,S,g-
( 59 )
( 60 )
ri
M
in
<
o s
"A n
er
Y
3
.S

.2
F
s
fi
4vSLl
<E
tr;
&
( 61 )
ITT
( 62 )
( )
64 )
ti'
tr'
Ir"
tr
ir
<
"i
l2
fc .5
o c
.
d
ti
03
s>
fc.=
' '
Im
fe jS
( 65 )
ff
tr
<
s
M
66
( 67 )
'
<>tf*t!> ?'
( 68 )
':
No.
of letters in
each,
line.
No.
of lineson
each page.
>
s
5,2
^
*" >
^ *"
1
ITNT
( 69 )
I
w
J
fir
>
>
<"
>
0
4^
>
MC
&
<-
( 70
1
ST
5;2
I
5
-5
0-"
V
er-
( n )
>
me
er
( )
( 73 )
( )
&
I
iT
1
0
No.
of lineson
&
V
1
P.

^-2
each
of let ers in
No.
each
>
1
0
( )
htf
or
I
0
ra'
s?
a
S
76 y
a-
%
fe
>
S
(
--SI
-
-S
<^ Ir'
;
*3
77 )
ir
;
0
\
V
>
-
>
>
tF
( 76 )
i
V
z.r
= j3
6 =
r
<T to t^
|f
fc.2
S
4
1s
-
'
( 77 )
V
>
&
78
ce
No.
of letters in
each
line.
each page.
>
nr
9
*-
of Hoeson
No.
I
"
<
ES
a
P5
79 )
= =
=
=
fi
< -sr
fe fr
* I If
(F
% i fe
1.
Ss
80 )
i
o
* o JE

55.5
to - IT
Iff
: | <^
|||
- F 4
=*
ffi-f
<& Z
'S .5
< 1
*
i
E i I' I
fr I & si
'if iCr
3 & fr fr
'
'
( 81 )
V
*-
&
<*
jr-
"
i
>
>
0 >
( or
eS<r-
>>
^
'
82
( 83 )
Inf
>
X >
<
if
( 84 )
( 85 )
i
te
y
ff
(
er
05
I
v
tar
( 86 )
I
*
to
<
Fi
.
'

J3 6
S
I
\j
-
""
V
-
<1
&
Ai/îh* ;.
( 87 )
m
9f
V
or or v
." 4>- Vf
I
nr
*
( 0
( 88 )
5*
. m U
03 SP
|
"
S-
^
s3
' '"
<-
*-
t.
-s
-ri
S
:
he
&<*_L
( 89
<<
_ -
"^ 'iE iF*
ho-
I? W
* fe f ff ** E 1
E # te 15b
W te & te -fe- &

_ p^ te
fe IE?
.il i! if 1
i? !* t te" -tT
fcflll
EI Kr
ffcL
V fc 1 <te
i
.7 fef I I* I
12
( 90 )
( M )
( 84 )
( 85 )
i
.
"
*
>
<
<
( 86 )
S
a
<
t
5* .5
z;
?4
Soi
| '
V
- S
S5~ )
I.
( 87 )
%
v
er <* v
^ J' >
2: <** *"
' (V .
I
/te/
i
"I
Il
IIIi
to "fe he
Ir
^ g IF
i
1
ill IfIt !
W" r- *- ,
hr
( 88 )
to
J
<V
S5 a '
ja
m y bo
9 a-> ce
( 89
13
( 90
('
fc
te
to
<3
-*-
fc
<*-
ja
. tu
5.S .
-5
<v
^
<
9
V
9
~- - -
f'
( )
( 92 )
93
*
I
0--
94 )
( 05 )
(-
Vf
rv
9
UT
( 96 )
S
.2
'
<
*- >
.,
.
5.S
^ 1
71
>
or &
or (
( >
W ur Hf
^ f' -
( 97 )
ir
>
I
'
os
J'
UT
13
( 98 )
ov
: v
to
: (V
0
in
No.
of let ers each
. x
ev
Cl
: <w
(
of
* a'
C3
fc.9
"S S
d S
.
jr
4^
if
cr
I
"
>
or
fT
( 9
i
te
( 100 )
to
<~ p
" r>
S5.S
0
0
*8
- 3
.S
e*4
>:
i
Ni
4 V
***
IV Ulf
> ,
*
( loi )
a-
9
-
I
to
3
S
.2 '
x
Il i I

Ai
ff
102 )
( 103 )
BAA
HIS PREDECESSORS AND CONTEMPORARIES.
The circumstance that Bna can be assigned with absolute certainty
to the first half of the seventh century of the Christian era lends great
importance to the introductory verses of the Harsha Charita, in which
reference is made to other known and unknown poets.* I will first
transcribe the passage, marking the various readings in my MSS. of the
text, and in a copy of the commentary which I have procured from
Jeypore, and then offer somo remarks as to the conclusions which may
be drawn from it :
TT: % TT \\ -*\ I
?^ T 3TRW 1:5*: <*H^|R-<T: ll<t

* Tho following paper is extracted from the Introduction to my edition of
Buna's Kdambav. I have omitted the analysis of the Harsha Charita itself,
given there, as we may shortly expect the results of a more thorough exami.
nation of that work from tho pon of Dr. Fhrer.
1 ft ^FTWT 44:. TT: .
* ff ^dlf^lfal^TTW , ,
and Com. omit aft and this verse. For , roads ^. "^ Both
MSS. write srfrTST.
?#.
14
* &^. ^.
" ~ $-
(sic.)
* %.
1 \."\-~ , , and Com. .
106
^ ? * M
i i ^ ^^* I
WT <$|11^ *M^<I<*H-H.: II
1% *WM *lll i4?-ni-q'iifii'l I
*|<*1 4ijîii s*Ji-4"i-*(<T v*

* RH - <|*- ^^ ^
stfrfo <**4 1 5351 I
it ^^ ^3^
$ ili'-H'l'iî^SgRT^f: I
cT5l4d4i-<^4,i' fwrorarw i
^-4i*-4l- A writes ||^||. So also below v. 14. So before it writes

incorrectly ^frqf. and 47fa%. * T 4T%rt ft'l'dC- 0 T ^ .
Cora. 10 <|<*|**| : &c. The Calcutta Edition omits all that precedes
this Une and prefixes the interpolated verso ^11)<*11 ^
* $r $ *UH<tf- " tT^Ninr frtr ^^^^:. Calo. Ed.

q^4t;5^TrR^d+l'i*4l'Îlt:
arft^ftTTt. Cale. Ed. 1.
W^TCT: Hall's first MS- :: " , $, wf!^;. &:.

41t " Rf A WSig. " ffalf:. Cale. Ed- f^-.
107 )
Wfa fr^RiT f4wrr[rrjfrw: I

*0*41^*1|*1*1'>| |1<"11*4. Il
^^'^' *^? 'ft^TW: II

5rJrt<:4rll4s^^H4*Kt>HIl4l!^T: '
?5|;5|^(1^^1 ?%: Il
The enumeration it will bo soen begins from Vydsa, who has his
place at one and the same time, alongside of the tutelary deities
invokedand as the exemplar of all good poets

f% fUWl *(8H iTtf^FTTTTf^fr I
? *rr3t tpt = R<i-<h4 ii

It may be fanciful : but in these, and in the numerous other refer
ences to the Mahbhrata to bo found in the Harsha Charita and
Kdambari, can we not recognise the language of a time when the name
and the fame of the Katha BhratIndia's ' Tale of Troy divine'as
put together by Vysa, was as yet comparatively a fresh wonder in
the world ?
From Vysa Bna goes to the great body of * story-tellers' or rhapsodists, Akhyyikkrs. Most writers have followed Hall in what I
venture to suggest is the erroneous idea that in v. 7 Bna alludes to a
poet called h au r a.* The context shows that the author is speak
ing of poets who are such only in name ('^*0 ; and in this verse
he in effect says that the plagiarist, however skilful his juncture may
be, finds no honour among learned men and is esteemed chauraa
thief. This is the natural construction, and it has the support of the com
mentary, the note in which runs as follows:3TPFT rf^VfT: ?1;
^ -% ^ - #^ 1*: <%;: %
^: 4l-*H-edH*lRrr?Tfrr'>,rf: ?^ 4TJPCr*l4W4l'tSo also Hall's second MS. with 3ff4 for 31?. " ^^^^:.
H?oErf?f^s:. " srfrrq^:.
* Hall, loe. cit., p. 54. See Biihler's paper in Ind. Stud. XIV., p. 406. In his
Kashmir Report Bhler shows that the only work ever ascribed to this my
thical Ohaura is a composition of Bilhana's.
108
The reference to the Akhyyikkrs, with which Bna begins his

enumeration of poets presumably nearer his own time than Vysa,
is extremely interesting in view of the question of the origin of
Kdambar. In later books on Rhetoric, the khyyk is defined as
resembling the Kath, with the difference that the genealogy of the
poet, and sometimes an account of other poets, are given. And the
Harsha Charita, which has very obviously suggested the definition, is
given as an example of the class. When, for the bettor understanding
of this definition we turn back to the description of Kath, we find that
species of composition distinguished as a narration in prose, with here
and there a stray verse or two, of matter already existing in a metrical
form* The existing collections of metrical fables, such as the
Kathde arits dg ara of So m ade.va and the Vrili athathd of
s h em e n dr a are later than Bna by several centuries; but Hall
and Bhlerf have shown that implicit confidence is due to Somadeva's
and Kshemendra's statements to the effect that their books are trans
lations into Sanskrit and abridgments of an older work. I shall show in
the sequel that the Kath-sarit-sgara contains one form of the original
of Bna's Kath Kdambar : and, when we bear in mind that Kadambar is given as tho stock example of a Kath, it is clear that by
khyftyik in the present passago Bna refers to metrical stories, such
as furnished him with tho theme of his own romance.
The poets next mentioned by name, or singly, are(1), the author of
a Vsavadatta ; (2), Bhattraharichandra ; (3), Stavhana; (4), Pravarasena, or, perhaps, the author of a work in praise of Pravarasena;
(5), Bhsa; (6), Klidsa; (7), tho author of a Vrihatkath. I do not
take h y ar dj a in the verse that follows as a proper name. Before
examining our list in detail, it may be well to ask how we are to regard
the list itself. It it be fair to judge from a casual note,J it would
* The otherwise praiseworthy translation of tbo Shityadarpana by Pramad
data-mitra in the Bibl. Ind. defeotive here. The text is :
ctf 3*3 ^
This, it is obvious, doos not moan " In tho Kath, which is one of the species
of poetical composition in prose, a poetical matter is represented in verse, and,
sometimes," &c, but rather as I have giren the senso above.
t Hall Inc. cit., pp. 22-24. Biihler, Ind. Ant, Vol. I., p. 302.
I" In Buna's Harsha Charita, Introd. v. 15, Bhsa is lauded on account of his
dramas : indeed his namo is oven put beforo that of Klidsa."Note on p. 205
of English translation of Indian Literature.
109 )
seem that the distinguished scholar Weber leans to the theory that wo
have here an attempt to classify, in order of merit, some of the writer
who preceded Bna. I can see no grounds for snch a supposition, and
the particular instance which Weber has in view does not, when closely
examined, in any way bear it out. For Bhsa and Klidsa are not here
compared as rival writers of dramas. If Buna's reference were all
that remained of the fame of the prince of Indian poets, we should
never have known that he wrote a play.
But, while the list is not in order of merit, it is not necessary to con
tend, on the other hand, that it is strictly in order of time. We can be cer
tain that the poets referred to lived before, or at the same time with,
Bna ; but we cannot be certain of more than this. What I wish to em
phasise is the internal evidence the Terses seem to furnish that they aro
not the tribute of cold respect, or even of warm though disinterested
admiration, for authors, the pride of their time, but already sinking into
oblivion to the men of Bna's day. I may be mistaken ; but it appears
to me that the passage breathes in every line the impulse of a mighty
revival in the last phase of which Bna himself bore part. With his
own eyes, so to say, he had seen the fame of other poets go out,
the star of the incomparable author of the Vsavadatt rose abovo his
country's intellectual horizon : he stood near tho time when Bhsa won
eternal fame by those plays of hisa form of composition unknown
before, and best described by an epithet (*^2>*4:) recalling
one of their special characteristics : the joy the people took in Klidsa
acted as a deterrent rather than an incentive to one who lived, while as
yet the fame of that new poet was yet fresh in the hearts of all men.
I shall make my meaning clear if I say that the tone of the passage
appears to me to resemble that which the poets who stood nearest our
own Elizabethan writers loved to use of that glorious company, rather
than that of a grave deliberate panegyric on the classical ornaments
of the long story of a nation's literature.
It is commonly taken for granted that the Tdsavadalt d,m
with which this list opens, is the extant romance by Subandliuoi
that name. This was the opinion of the commentator of that Vsava
datt, ivar dm a Tripdthin, who quotes the present couplet, and
refers it expressly to his author. The commentator of tho Barsha
Charita, who as a rulo occupies himself more with verbal explanations
than with anything else, does not say anything on the point. Hall
expresses no doubt on the subject ; though he would also seem to have
held, on the ground of internal evidence, that his Subandhu was pos
terior to Bhavabhti.t who it is certain now, must in his turn be placed
* Hall's Introduction to Vsavadatt, p. .
t Ibid., p. 14.
,-
"
after Bna.* It is impossible not to wish to agree with Hall in hi

estimate of tho relative positions of Bhavabhti and his Snbandhu.
For that after the graceless string of extravagant and indecent pun
presented by the present Vsavadatt had been received with approval
into the national literature, a reversion should have been possible to
the chastity, alike of sentiment and of diction, of Bna and Bhavabhti,
would be a literary miracle almost incredible. The matter is not on
which to dogmatize, but I may call attention to the following consider
ations as tending to show that the Vsavadat which excited Bna's
passionate admiration was not the worthless production now oxtant
under that name. In the first place, then, it seems probable that this
Ysavadatt was like Bna's own Kdambar, a metrical or prose
version of one of the tales of the rhapsodists mentioned in the verse
immediately preceding. It will be shown in the sequel how closely
Bna himself followed, for the incidents of bis story, his original.
Now the Kath-sarit-egara does contain a tale of Vsavadatt, which
the author of the Ratnval took as the ground-work of his play, and
this tale is not identical with, or in any way similar to, Subandhu's
romance.f Secondly, Hall appears to be right in pointing out that
there is little reason to suppose that Subandhu had need to be beholden to
any previous author, for his narrative. " Ktyyana the grammarian, is
* " According to the Rajatarangini, Bhavabhti was patronized by Yasovarma,
king of Kanoja. This Yasovarma was subdued by Lalitditya, king of Kemira,
who acquired by his conquests a paramount supremacy over a largo part of
India. The mention of this circumstance enables us to fix the date of IJliavabhti. Lalitditya reigned, according to General Cunningham, from 693 A.c. to729 A.c. The chroniclo of Kemira mentions another poet named Vakpatiraja,
who lived at the court of Yasovarma. A work in Prakrit entitled Gaudavadba
Kiivya by this same Vakpatiraja has recently been discovered by Dr. Bhler.
In it, the exploits of Yasovarma and his defeat of a Ganda king aro narrated.
In giving his own history, the poet tells us that " certain excellences still shinein his works like drops of poetic nectar churned from the ocean of Bhavabhti."
From this it would appear, that Vakpatiraja was either a pupil of Bhavabhti,
or one of those who derived benefit from his company. If the poem then waswritten in the latter part of Yasovarma' s reign, Bhavabhti must have lived
in tho first part. So that, our poet flourished at the ond of the seventh century.
And the date thus determined agrees with all that is known of the chronolo
gical relations of Bhavabhti with other writers. In the first place, Buna's
omission of his name from the long list given by him at tho beginning of his
Harsha Charita is now intelligible. Bna flourished in tho first half of the
seventh century."Bhandarkar's Introduction to ildlat Hdhava, p. ix.
+ " The romance of V&savadatti, referred to in the Mlali-iidhava, as in likemanner that found detailed in the Kath-sarit-sgaraand which had pre
viously [?] been dramatized in the Ratuavali resembles in scarcely a foature,
barring the oommon appellation of their respectivo heroines, the one with which
wo are at present engaged." (Hall's Introduction to Visavadatt, p. 2.)
Bhandarkar has pointed out to me that Bhavabhftti's reference to a tale which
he puts on a lino with those of Sakuntalil and Drvaei, and which is evidently
not Subandhu's story, goes far to establish the existence of some each Vasavadatt as that to which I believe Bna refers bore.
111
the earliest author known by whom a tale of Vsavadatt appears to be

indicated. To discourage the surmise that Subaudhu was beholden to
this, or to any other ancient composition, there is however, the argu
ment of entire silence, in all Hindu literature yet discovered, that ho
was thus indebted. The object which he proposed to himself was, it
is justly inferred, of a nature to render choice of plot a matter of very
secondary import. His aim, as slight observation may suffice to con
vince, is the illustration of certain powers of the Sanskrit language ;
and this, through the medium of such imagery, as was in his time,
counted most tasteful, and such allusions to Indian lore as were
then held especially in esteem. At tho least it is accordingly just as
probable that he devised, as that he borrowed, the hungry array of
incidents which he has employed as a vehicle for the execution of his
purpose." I should prefer to say that Subandhu's purpose left him
free to borrow from any available sources such incidents as seemed
suitable ; and it is in that light that I should explain certain coincidences
between his narrative and that of our author.
Bhattdraharichandra is still no more than a name to us
and the reference made to his work is ambiguous, Bna's aim unfortu
nately being rather to illustrate the simile beween tho composition in
question and a good king, than to convey information of the kind we
want. The note in the commentary is oH-dHI ^PT: JTfET l-qi|
ftft\R*nh **4rf'M<4v ^r fregara v^rftf *r " fnr ^"rpTRwrprf ^ ^^-^ [tfterr]

fwfiJT^Tn -Ki^Nf'TRf ffTrfhi ^ 4Hlf3ffehl<4eMf?[-
<T4T*t4 reifen ^fw^rfftr% 4Slf ^'. In the beginning

oMahevara's Vievapraka, tho author traces his lineage
to one Harichandra who was a physician at the court of
Sahasdnka If there were any other reasons for identifying this
Sahasnka with the king (S a s d n a) who slow Harsha's brother, we
might find our Harichandra hero : and regard him as one of the authors in
virtue of whose writings Sri Sdhas dnka, like Srillarsha, stands
among the poets.* The honorific epithet Bhattra was much in uso
among the earlier Jains as a designation of those who abandoned the
* crffrgtnffit 3w%: ? 4ifr-
% wr 4xwft TTrft % ^ trft % Il

Bjaekhara in the amgadhara-paddhati : quoted in Aufrecht's paper on
that work in the 27th volume of the Zeitschrift dor Deutschon Morgonlndisahen Gesellschaft.
112
Worldly lifo. The Svetmbara Jains have a mahkvyam on ah hist'

rical subject called D h a r m a a r m d bh y d a y a, by BhattrakaHarichandra, which presents many points of resemblance
with Klidsa's Raghuvamsa. I have not yet been able to procure
the U h a r m a a r m d h d a y a, * and cannot say whether these
resemblances are vulgar plagiarisms, or are to be accounted for in the
way in which I attempt below to account for the resemblance between
Klidsa and other writers of his time.
Sdtdvahana' s Koshaf was at first taken to be a vocabulary :
but it has long been seen that Kosha is used here in the technical sense
which it bears already in Dandin's Kvydarsa.J It is more difficult
to say with any certainty whether the work to which Bna refers, or
any part of it, has come down to us. There is in existence a Prakrit
anthology of love poems called the Saptaatakavi of Hla, which
there is fair reason, as has been generally recognised, for holding to be
the Kosha of our verse. Hla is given by Hemachandra as a synonym
of Stavhana. In his commentary on Hla's Saptasatakam Gangdhara-bhatta identifies Hla with Slivhana, as the Bombay MS. reads
the name. A circumstance which seems to support the traditional
view is noticed now, as is believed, for the first time. It is difficult to
understand how the Kosha, which won for Stavhana undying fame,
andwhat has perhaps stood him in better stead,a place in this list
of poets, can have been a collection of the kind of which the Srngadhara-paddhati may be put forward as a type. The poet may, and tho
Indian poet often did, stoop to collect into a ' treasury' the verses of
others : but no title to immortality can be drawn from work which can
be done as well by the intelligent critic.
* Bodl. Cat., p. 187.
t The note in the commentary !e atf^rrf^pj- ^ ^rurp
Wf 4T^ff T4l4"li Sf4 ft:. I should have mentioned earlier that the
commentary givos very little help hero. Sankara, as Bho Dji, loe. cit., p. 39,
as already noticed, evidently knew no more than ho could gather, or thought
he could gather, from his text.
J Hall, p. 14. The technical meaning of the word is thus given in the
Sahitya-darpana in the same context in which tho definitions of Kath and
Akbyyik, which we have already had occasion to consider, stand
irîyrJUUT tf^T: T 44l744k4: Il

Tho commentary explains * by fl- I ri4Hi*H= efa^T:- Compare a title
like the Golden Treasury.
St. Petorsb. Diet-, sub voce [. See also Aufrecht's Catalogue, p, 195.
( )
In other words, it is not unreasonable to suppose that the poems
brought together in the Kosha were original. Now there are, I submit,
grounds for supposing that Hla's Saptasatakam is a collection of
this kind : and not, as the eminent scholar Weber holds, a collection of
verses by different hands. In his essay *' On the Saptasatakam of
Hala," Weber discusses this question as follows:" That the work is
a collection, and not the production of a single author is clear not only
from the author's own words in the third verse, but, more particularly,
from the circumstance that the scholiast, though unfortunately he does
not carry the practise beyond the beginning of the commentary, gives
with each verse the name of its author. These names moreover are
given in prkrit,* a circumstance which makes it tolerably certain that
they belong to the text. Unfortunately they break off with the 15th
verse. The names given up to that are : Hlassa (the compiler him
self ! f) 4, 13, Vodisassa 5, Chullohassa 6, Maarandasenassa 7, Amararassa 8, Kumrillassa 9, Sirirassa (rrja) 11, Bhmasmino (Bhmasvamin) 14. Of all these names only one, Kumrila, is familiar to
us in another connection, namely, as that of the eminent teacher of
the Mmmsa philosophy. . . . Besides these, Bho Dji mentions
the following as given also by Kulantha: Kavirja, Vishnudatta, Ratirja, Paramararasika, Nsra, Avar, Kavva, sala, Jalaharadhvan,
Kesava. These must, I suppose, be given in parts of the commentary
which have not come into my hands. Among these names, too, which
it must be noted have a somewhat strange and suspicious look, but
which like the previous ones are in prkrit, so as, like them, to raise
the presumption that they belong to the text, there is again only one
familiar to us in another connection, namely, that of Kavirja, known
to us as that of the author of the Rghvapndavyam, who however
cannot, on account of the date, be thought of here." The " author's
own words " to which Weber refers in the beginning of this pas
sage are found in the third verse of the Saptaatakam, and run aa
* " In prakriti $ cher G enetiv for m." I omit the last word, as I do
not understand that Wober lays any stress on the circumstance that the names
are, as always, in the genitive case. May I in passing, with all respect, deprocate the attaok on Bho Dji's ' curious style' for what is obviously a printer's
error as proceeding from the learned German whose own style is the despair
of the English translator.
t There would be nothing surprising in the fact of a compiler of an antho
logy including verses of his own. " Srngadhara, the compiler of the antho
logy often in the various divisions of the work inserts efforts of his own. These
have no poetical merit. In the 14th century Sarasvat's lips had long been
closed." (Aufrecht's paper in the magazine of the German Oriuntal Society.) I
have noticed the same circumsiance in a aubhfishitavali of Vallabhdeva in my
possession.
15
"4
follows in the original prftkrit, and in Gangftdharabhatta's Sanskrit

gloss* :
4k ? Tit UW*Hlul 1WPT II ^ Il

feiN<:4lM W44H1 4'W4y+IH.^4di ^ II
iT^fir I HAMlft 4)Ri(c*lrt4 ' I fI%T -=1( *1+11
11 1 ? : i <*R'ii4i+J4ûi '+ i ^<*
^ *1* +llrt*Klul <II4H <*li*w ^ iMdlH
i *i^4<4 ffa - ?% t% *\3\ ^

Il II
It appears to me to be at least doubtful whether this Terse has been
correctly understood to mean that Hla in the works of which he is
speaking has " collected"f seven hundred poems by different authors.
I venture to suggest that *.| has its ordinary acceptation here ;
and that that the Terse really means that of the thousands^ of gths
which (v. 2) are the admiration of men of discrimination, Hdla is tho
author of no less tlian seven hundred, namely, these which are given in
the booh that follows. If I am right, we have an easy explanation of the
fact that the commentator's list of authors breaks off with the 15th
Terse, and of the perhaps even more significant fact that the names he
gives are unknown, and wear the appearance of unreality which Weber
justly notes.
The contents of the Saptaatakam, it must be added, do not in any way
militate against such an hypothesis. The verses are all in the same metre,
a circumstance in which Weber sees an indication of the antiquity of the
collection : but which may as naturally, it is obvious, be referred to the
predeliction for a particular kind of verse entertained by an individual
author. Weber has noticed places where the verses, which as a rule have
no very closo relation to each other, are brought more nearly together,
* I quote from the MS. in the Bombay Government collection deposited in
the Elphinstono College, wliich Weber also usod.
t Weber has apparently felt the difficulty of giving this meaning to fTT%f*r, a word which everywhere else is consistently used, in this connection, in
tho sense of ' composed.' At p. 4 of the Essay ho translates the word by zusam
mengestellt (collected) : at p. 73 by zurecht gestellt (arranged). It is not
unimportant that ilrfacfflW is applied to tho verses themselves (*1111|) and
not to somo snch collective title as *|4:.
X Tho rT in 'ho midst of which are Hla's seven hundred versos may
have boon a collection mado by his order.
Compare Kshomendra's remarks as given in foregoing Report, p. 11.
either by the carrying over from one verse to one or more following
verses of the same situation (vv. 70 and 71, 80 and 81, 129 and 130,
135 and 137), or by the recurrence of a catchword in several verses
that stand together (vv. 11820, 122125, 156 and 157, 162 and 163,
259264, 267269, 308-310, 315 and 316, 324 and 325, and 329
and 330).
The locale of all the verses appears to be the same, while the
slightly varying themes on which all the seven hundred verses ring the
changes are no more inconsistent with a common origin than the love
plaints of Heine's Buch der Leider, or the various shapes one sorrow
takes in Tennyson's In Memoriam. The matter is again not one on
which to dogmatise : but if this bo, as I believe it is, the character of
the Saptasatakam of Hla, we may perhaps be permitted to see in that
circumstance corroboracin of the traditional identification of Hala with
the Stavahna, who by his "Treasury" won for himself a fame that
could not perish.
The question of Stavhana's date I do not wish to enter upon. I
content myself with pointing out, as Bho Dji and Weber have already
done,* that the author of the Kath-sarit-sgara makes him a con
temporary of Gundhya, the author of the Vrihatkath. This is found
also in Kshemcndra's Vrihatkath .f Somadeva makes Gundhya the
minister of king Stavahna of Pratishthna. That the Stavahna
and the author of the Vrihatkath to whom reference is made here by
were contemporaries is at all events then not out of keeping with
the view I have endeavoured to support of the general character of
this passage.
" The glory of Pravarasena flashed, bright as the lotus, to the further
shore of the sea by means of the ' Bridge,' just like the army of apes."
There can, I take it, bo no reasonable doubt that the reference here,
as Weber first recognised, is to the extant Prakrit poem the 8 e t v y a or Setu-bandha. But it appears to me to be quite
as certain that Bna knows nothing of the tradition which ascribes that
poem to Klidsa. Thero is no authority for the omission of the next
following couplet with regard to Bhsa, so as to bring the couplet
in which Klidsa is mentioned by name in juxtaposition with our
verse. J And it appears to me to be impossible to admit that verses
* Essay, p. 2.
t Buhler's paper in Indian Antiquary, Vol. I., p. 307.
X Max Mller (" India: What can It teach us," p. 315,) pointed ont this diffi
culty to Dr. Bhfio Dji. I may add that there appears to be no donbt that tho
proper reading in what I may call the Klidsa verse is Nirgattu na vi
116 )
15 and 17 both refer to KAlidsa. He is obviously adduced in the

latter of the two verses for the first time. This being so, I think it
is impossible, with our present light, to say what amount of truth
there is in the legend which makes Pravarasena the patron and not
the author of the Setu-bandha. In that detail the legend is not, in itself,
indeed inconsistent with Bna's reference to the book.as it is quite possible
that here, as in his allusion to the Vsabadatt, our author, unfortunately
for us, did not think it necessary to mention a name, as that of the
author of the book, which in his day seemed as if it would never die.
But when the !<_;> r.d goes on to ascribe the poem to Klidsa, it is in
direct conflict, is it appears to me, with Bna's statement, and cannot
therefore be accepted. Pravarasena, moreover, is in no way the subject
of the Setu-bandha : so that he must be mentioned here either as the
author of the poem, or as the patron of the poet. "When we look at the
context, and remember that Bna's theme is the triumph of good poets,
we can hardly, I think, resist the conclusion that it is the author's fame,
and not that of any patron, which this famous bridge carried over sea.
It does not, of course, follow that the Pravarasena who wrote the
Setu-bandha is not the king of Kashmir* with whom, in his presumed
character of patron of the work, and friend of Klidsa, he has been
identified by Bho Dji and Max Mller. The commentator on the
Setu-bandha was a king : and there is no reason why the Setu-bandha
should not have been written by a king. But if I am right in regard
ing with suspicion the legend referred to above, it will be seen that the
motive, as well as some of the arguments for the identification in ques
tion, must be held to have lost much of their force.
I will only add that ankara evidently knows nothing of the tradi
tion which assigns the Setu-bandha to Klidsa. His note is :
1: ^ftV^ft: 4%,g?r 4-- H4lf*H: C^Tt STW
and not Nisargasrnvamsasya as the Calcutta Ed. has. But the va here
does not connect this verse with the verse immediately preceding (the Bhsa
verse), and still less of course with the verse preceding that, which we aro now
considering. It resumes the whole argument, as to the fame of the true poet
of which Kahdasa's glory is one of the asi examples cited.
* " How Pravarasena distinguished himself wo are no longer informed. Among
the various kings so called were two of Kashmir, the former of whom was
grandfather of the second. The latter, according to Kalhana, dethroned, and
afterwards rehabilitated Pratftpasila or Silditya, son of Vikramaditya Rija,
iarangvt, chap. 3, si. 332 and 333, p. 33 of the Calcutta edition. But the time
and country of this Silditya are still to be determined. If his paternity is
rightly stated by Kalhana he was not of Gujerat. That he ruled over
is very much more likely."Hall, Introduction to Vasavadatt, p. 14.
117
h d s a' s fate has been a cruel one. Beferred to here as the chief,
if not the first,* of the illustrious line of Indian dramatists, and looked
up to by Klidsa himself as his master, he has left nob a line of his
writingunless we admit his authorship of a few verses attributed
to him in the Sdrgadhara Paddhat i, and other late antho
logies,which has survived. It is as if Chaucer were known to us
only as the poet whom Spencer called, ' the well of English undented,'
or as if Shakespeare's fame rested on Milton's sonnet.
I wish to suggest that the manner in which the ntakas of Bhsa
are characterised in the verse may perhaps point to the conclusion
that B&na recognised these compositions as novelties, in the revival of
Sanskrit letters which he is celebrating. The argument is not one that
can be pressed, since the significance of the epithets may spring rather
out of the desire to justify the simile employed: but the point is perhaps
worth consideration. Weber has already suggested that it may possibly
have been the representation of Greek dramas at the courts of the Grecian
kings in Bactria, in the Panjab, and in Guzerath which awakened the
Hindu faculty of imitation, and so gave birth to the Indian drama. On
this theory the introduction of the technical terms which Buna uses here,
must have been contemporaneous with, or followed closely upon, the in
troduction of the drama itself. But that is what we should expect in the
aesumed case of the introduction from abroad by a coterie of learned men
of a foreign kind of literature. And the difficulty which has always been
felt of explaining the technical terms of Hindu dramatic criticism may
be due to the fact that these early pedants went, for a terminology of
the new art, to the text-books of an art that had existed from time
immemorialthe art of building. The sutradhdraoi the drama
is not to be explained by conjuring up an earlier form of plays in the
shape of puppet-shows, the strings of which were pulled by him, or even,
with Weber f and Lassen, by referring the title to the work of erecting
* ankara's note on the Klidsa verse is as follows:
^.
!^<<-: !^ <1*-|1 rPfl" *
? [] f ft ^1 m +^'1"1 I VU"!"! [] ^
-^ -^wr ? II ffr 4$W :: TW; = ^ *Wtt History of Indian Sanskrit Literature ; note on p. 276.
8 )
the theatre, a work which we have no reason to suppose was actually

laid on the sutradhra of the stage. The term, with others, was taken
over bodily from one art into the other : and in its new acceptation
applied to that one among the actors who was to the production of a
play what the real sutradhra was to the building of a house.
ankara's note on the Bhsa verse is as follows : : u30lH<
5 wrer - ^ TTTsrf^: >~ f%f: 4d[=hl 4=hT*l4^
^ ^ (% |lT!T?fr 4dl*lNext comes Klidsa :
" And so soon as Klidsa's sweet sayings went forth from him, was
there any one who did not rejoice in them as in honey-laden flowers."
The colourless character of the description here given of Klidsa's
works is much to be regretted. But the negative evidence of the verse as
it stands is not unimportant. It is difficult for us now to imagine a time
when the supremacy that has for a thousand years been assigned to
Sakuntal among India's dramatic works was withheld from, or only
grudgingly bestowed on, Klidsa. A poet, however, like a prophet, is
not honoured in his own country or in his own time ; and we have it on
Klidsa's own authority that his plays were received with a certain
amount of prejudice by the literary critics, who, in those days as ever,
loved to say that the ' old is better.' * There is a good deal of other
evidence for the comparatively late date now sought to be assigned to
Klidsa ; and on a review of that evidence it is difficult to resist the
conclusion that the explanation of the naturo of Bna's references
to the younger poet, and to Bhsa respectively, is that at the time he
wrote Klidsa's plays had either not been written, or were still far
from occupying the prominent place in the nation's literature they
* 5 I ^f^?fr(^nft4^+ir<i4?id^*g4i?rrf}ir44 \ +^^ff*afar> 44 ( ?1? #~?* i

*: frcrci % I
uuuift<-^ firj * nrf ^4 , I
119
afterwards attained. When the inherent excellence of these composi

tions is remembered, I think it must further be granted that the second
of these alternatives is equivalent to saying that Klidsa was either a
contemporary of our author, or was his elder by little more than a gene
ration. This is an hypothesis to which I shall recur after offering
remarks on the last of the works to which Bna refers :
/ipH'*'-^! '+! i *
?w7rt<c fr *w ^ ff^rr il
Somadeva, the author of the a t h d- a r i t-s g a r a (about
the beginning of the 12th century), and s h e m endr a, the author of a
Vfihatkathd (the second and third quarters of the 11th century),
both tell us that their works are abridgments and translations into
Sanskrit of the Vrihatkath of G n d dh y a. This last work has not
yet been foundf extant. For long the only evidence that it had ever
existed was Somadeva's assertion, which was, however, it may be
pointed out in passing, clearly entitled in itself to greater weight than
scholars like Wilson, Brockhaus and Lassen were disposed to attach
to it. If there is one matter more than another in which the personal
statement of an author deserves implicit credence, it is surely where
we find him acknowledging his indebtedness to an earlier work, which
he could have had no conceivable notice for inventing. Wilson was
misled by the unmistakable signs of relationship between certain tales
in the Kath-sarit-sdgara and independent works which it was impos
sible to place later than Somadeva. As Weber first pointed out,J
* The note here is : ^ fcqmmft jj t$R ^
r?r ? ^Tra^rfT: 4ir 4%f * I? ^: $$

%3
*34l<'4l#4rrCl^'RITr4+|b4Hlfa: I
wwM'iRfrb ^": rjFi^r II
tfff 4ft yprft ^t!4- frwf ^: w wr MutrT fl ir
RlW * ^-..
+ I had written that the original Vrihatkhathu of Gunadhya, in the Paisoha
dialect "was not extant," but, as these sheets aro passing through the press I
learn from Bhandarkar that word of tbo existence of a copy has been brought
to him, and that he hopes soon to secure it.
% Indischen Stroifen, Vol. I., p. 358.
120 )
Kdambari itself is another example of the same phenomenon. I have

shown that the author of the Shityadarpana knew that Kdambari
was a redaction into prose of a tale already existing in a material form,
and it is clear now that the coincidences Wilson has the credit of first
observing should have been accepted by that scholar as supplying
corroborative evidence of the truth of Somadeva's assertion. He pre
ferred, however, to believe that Somadeva had borrowed from these
earlier prose-writers, and that his assertion about a Vrihatkath, pre
sumably prior both to him and to them, was intended to conceal his
debt; and in this he was followed by other eminent scholars. The
utmost respect for one of the most honoured and honourable pioneers
in these studies need not prevent the obvious moral being pointed that
it may sometimes be the safer course to accept statements like that
made by Somadeva until their inaccuracy can be demonstrated, instead
of regarding them from the beginning as tainted with fraud.
In a list of Sanskrit works prepared for Captain Wilford, and pre
sented by him through Colebrooke to the Asiatic Society, there is an
entry with regard to the Vrihatkath by Kshemendra. This work
Bhler had the good fortune to recover ; and to him we owe the dis
covery that Kshemendra, like Somadeva, calls his work a traslation into
Sanskrit of a work written in the Paischa language by Gundhya.
" arva proclaimed it first : Knabhti heard it from the Glana (Pushpadanta-Vararuchi), and told it to Gundhya, who delivered it in his
turn to his pupils and to Stavhana. The story which had thus
come to be written in the Paischa language, gave trouble to the
readers. For this reason it has been rewritten in Sanskrit."t While
as yet uncertain as to Kshemendra's date, Bhler was able to show
from a comparison of the two books, whose contents are identical,
that it was extremely improbable that the one was, in any way, a
modification of the other, and that therefore the only reasonable sup
position was that both really drew, as they said they did, from an
older work in one of the low vernaculars. In the course of his brilliant
researches in Kashmr.J Bhler was later, able to fix Kshemendra's
date as prior, by some seventy years, to that of Somadeva. He
had already argued that it was impossible to admit that " the con
nected and clear story" given by Somadeva had been constructed out of
the " short and undefined outlines," found in Kshemendra ; and, it
being now clear that Kshemendra in his turn could not have copied
from a poet who flourished two generations later than himself, no doubt
remained as to the existence in the tenth century of a Vrihatkath by
* There is a copy of part of the work in the Bhao Dji collection.
+ Indian Antiquary, Vol. I., p. 307.
J Biihler's Kashmir Tour, p. 47.
121
Gundhya. Is this the work to which Buna refers P * It appears to

me that there are strong reasons for holding that it is, and that the
reference is made to an almost contemporaneous redaction by Gun
dhya of stories that for many centuries previous had been more or les3
current. To connect the Vrihatkath of Gundhya with Bana's re
ference all that is required is to show that Bna was familiar with that
collection of tales. t
But a comparison of the tale taken from Gundhya by Somadeva
with Bna's version is sufficient to corroborate, in the fullest manner,
the theory to which all the external evidence already points, namely,
that we have in it the original from which Bna took his plot, reserving
to himself the poet's right to make such modifications as he thought
fit. No reason can be assigned why the dry and colourless narrative of
the fablists should have deviated as they do from the tale that had
entranced the world in ' Kdambar,' iE we embrace the old hypothesis
of the relation between the two. And the differences are of the kind
which genius imposes on the stuff it is working in. They correspond to
the changes made in popular legends, to suit their immediate purpose,
by the Greek dramatists. It would be as reasonable to see in the few
lines in which Homer lightly touches on tales known, as he has them,
to all men, an abridgment, notwithstanding the signal discrepancies, of
the Agamemnon of Êschylus, or the Electra of Sophocles, as to
contend that Somadeva has wilfully altered the features of the work
which must, on any other hypothesis, be presumed to have been
serving him for model. J And the same observation will, I am confident,
be found to apply equally to the work of Klidsa.
" Gundbya's Vrihatkath goes back to the first or second century of our
era."Biihler's Kashmir Tour, p. 47. " The Vrihatkath of Gundhya belongs
to about the sixth century."Weber, English Translation of Sanskrit Litera
ture, p. 213, note. I trust that discrepancies between eminent authorities of
which this is only one of many examples it would be easy to give, may be some
excuse if I am caught tripping, as I am painfully aware may at any moment be
my fate, in the course of this difficult excursion.
+ There follows in the Introduction to Kdambar a long extract from the
Kathsaritsgara containing the same story, which is here omitted.
J Compare Somadeva's own words :
**?* ^ fr*nt II
I have printed ^ frH ^^^ witb tne ^- tne êo *^J'
collection, and with Brockhaus. Hall reads "on the authority of a very excel,
lent manuscript" 1^^1%5 4TT (%* ; and translates." It is merely an epitom of the larger work, and in the familiar language." Biihlor (Indian
Antiquary, Vol. I., p. 303,) gives his snpport to this way of taking the passage.
But it is surely doubtful whethor, in Somadeva's time, bhsh could have the
meaning here ascribed to it : and there seems no very good reason, in this
16
122
Last in this passage comes the poet dhyarftja or Adyarja, of whom

nothing else appears to be known, and who is, I suspect, as much the
fruit of a misapprehension as the Chaura of v. 5. Here Bna says
that the brave deeds of famous kings are in his heart, well remembered,
but that on that very account, strange as it may seem ()> his tongue
cannot sing forth their praises, being drawn back into his throat by
the very recollection of his subject. Nevertheless, he will attempt to
speak in prose of the deeds of Harsha, &c. There may be an intentional
ambiguity in dhyarja (adyarja) as referring both to 'kings of song'
and to kings of the earth : but I doubt if the supposed reference to a
poet called by that name has any foundation.
I must be content with little more than a reference to other works
that were either written by Bna, or have been ascribed to him. The
Cha n d i d- a t a is a century of verses in honour of Chamlik,
which is referred to by certain Jain commentators on the Bhakt m araetotrao Mdnatu g a, and a copy of which was discovered by
Bhler.* That scholar has acutely pointed out a line in this composition
which, as frequently happens, is in all probability the sole foundation
for the ridiculous story of the Jain commentators with regard to its
origin. The tradition, however, as handed down by these commen
tators, may, it is considered, preserve this much of sober fact, that
the Chandikd*atakaot Bna, the Srya-ataka of M a ur a, and the h t m arastotra of Man ai are three
opposing poems written by devotees of ono or other of the great forms
of religion which nourished side by side under Harsha's protection.f
In the third volume of the Indian Antiquary (p. 219), Telang has
called attention to the close resemblance in subject-matter, and
occasionally even in expression between a drama styled P r v at iparinaya, which is ascribed to Bna, and parts of Klidsa's
Kumdrasambhava. Telang "does not venture to ascribe the
Prvatparinaya to Klidsa" : and has considerable hesitation in accepting
even as possible what he regards apparently as the only alternative,
namely, that the author of the play took Klidsa's poem as the basis for hia
own work. It will bo a sincere gratification to me if a scholar who has
done and will do so much for the elucidation of moot points in the history
way of taking the passage, why vidyate should be in tho singular. With our own
reading I should explain tho word as meaning ' an exposition (perhaps a ren
dering or translation) of no moro than an abridgmont of tho completo book.'
Hall, Introduction to ' Vasavadatt,' pp. 8 and 49. Biihler, 'On the
Chundiksataka of Bnabhatta in the Indian Antiquary, Vol. I., p. HI.
t There are many references in tho Harsha Charita to the worship of the Bun.
Mayftra is among those mentioned there as the friends and coevals of Bans. It
is not impossible that ho may afterwards have given a daughter in marriage to
his friend. In a Subhshitavali by Vallabhadova, which I acquired laut year,
there are verses attributed to the joint authorship of Bna and Mayura.
123 )
o Sanskrit literature, shall find anything in the considerations I have

urged in this paper to lead him to regard, with me, the undeniably
close connexion, which he has the merit of having established between
these two poems, as only another illustration of the fact that the brother
poets of the golden age of letters in India, like the great dramatists of
Greece, did not disdain to borrow in substance their plots from a common
source. I venture also to think, though here there may be more reason
for doubt, that the almost verbal coincidences which Telang has singled
out go to show that the Prvatparinaya was written while as yet the
fame of the Kumrasambhava had not overshadowed the common
original of the two worksin other words, that Bna and Klidsa
were almost if not altogether contemporaries.
Pandit Durg Prsada informs me that in a commentary by G li
ft a v i n a y a g a n i on the Nalachamp, the following passage occurs
in the sixth uchchhvsa:
?TWT?^^'dir'S<i*H['* II
: ^^ f4 T$T: 44WfW f4
SF^f: |? - 4)c<!lH4l<4| f% |
5: $1^* ** SifTT: MT: Il
From this it would appear that a play by Bna, called M t atdilaka, may be still in existence.
Lastly, there is a statement in the Kvya-Praksa to the effect that
for one of his works Bna got from king Harsha neither fame, nor
divine favour, but a third 'fruit' of poetry, namely, money; and on this
ground Hall, followed by Biihler, would ascribe the Batnval, which
professes to be the work of a king Harsha, to Bna. The hypothesis, it
will be noticed, is a double onefirst, that the statement in the KvyaPraksa refers to the Katuval; and, secondly, that the statement is to
be accepted. There appears to be a consensus of authority among the
commentators of the Kvya-Praksa as to the former point ; a close
comparison of the Ratnval with Bna's other work would probably be
conclusive as to the latter.
Is it possible to form any conjecture as to what it was which, in the
6ch7th century, gave the impulse to the great * burst of song,' the
memory of which has never died out of the literary consciousness of
the learned among the Hindus ? Here I approach ground strewed with
the ashes of smouldering fires and will walk warily. I have indeed
only one argument to offer in this controversy : and will premise it
with the remark that the most ardent patriotism need not, as it should
not, make a Hindu scholar resolved to shut his eyes to anything
tending to show that, notably at this time, some of his country's poets
124
were touched, if no more than touched, by a live coal from off the
altar which is the sacred birthplace of the poetry and philosophy of the
whole western world. When down-trodden Greece made prisoner her
conqueror she could boast that she carried the first seeds of literal
culture to a rude and unlettered people, which, however far their ow
efforts in that field might carry them, must always trace their first
beginnings in it to Athens. The India of the Rig-Veda knows no
such dependence on foreigners for the intellectual and spiritual life
that flows through her frame.
I cannot here enter into any detailed examination of the discussion
as to the existence and extent of Greek influence in the works of such
of the Indian mr'diajval writers as have come down to us. I proceed to
state very briefly reasons which appear to me to go to show that liana
was, in a fash'on and to a degree which I cannot pretend to define, sub
ject to an influence whose all-pervading power is, when we think of it,
almost as much of a miracle as the spread of Christianity itself.
In the first place, then, I do not think it is possible any longer to
resist* the available proof that Indian astronomy as taught by abhata (a.D. 476) and V ar dh a mih ira (died A.D. 58), and as
known to Klidsa and to Bna, is of Greek origin. That being taken
for granted, it is clear that in the absence of direct evidence it is more
probable than not that Greek influence, whether exerted directly or
through some intermediate channel of communication, was not confined
to that branch of literature where it has left traces of its presence too clear
to be explained away, and that what might elsewhere have been explained
away as mere coincidences may fairly, as the facts stand, be held to wear
a very different aspect.f Can we point to anything in our author which
If this position is premature it is time that some defender of the autoch
thonous origin of the system replied to the arguments of European scholars in
the matter. But is it too muoh to say that Sh. Pandit, for example, virtually
gives up tho fight when he takes refugo in the hypothesis that diametron may
be a Greecized from of j.'unitra. (Preface to Ba<?huvamsa, p. 43.) Is this not
equivalent to playing with the two worts as if they were two counter* with
reîird to which nothing is known but their present form and the meaningless
inscription they boar. Diametron is a pure Greek word, formed after the
analogy of hundreds of other words, from n verb used by Homer, and itself ocouring in the vocabulary of Plato and of Aristotle. In Sanskrit jmitra is a
hybrid word, of no assigniblo origin within the language itself, and seen first
in the works of those astronomers, uniese wo are to take its presence in dsaas evidence that it had existed in Sanskrit for hundreds of years before.
When Sh. Pandit then goes on to say that " whether however jmitra is obtain
ed from diamotron or diametron from jmitra, tho two words having the samo
astrological sensomust have had a common origin," he roally concedes all that is
asked. For it is quite certain that jamitra cannot, be the origin of diametron.
+ " It was however Greek influence that first infusod a real life into Indian
astronomy. This occupies a much more important relation to it than has
hithoi to been supposed : and the fact that this is so of tself implies that Greek
125
must be regarded either as a fortuitous coincidence in style between two

literatures that never really touched, or the effect, however remote, of
the one upon the other? Before setting out what appears to me to be
something of the kind desiderated, I will make two preliminary re
marks. In the first place there is of course no question here of each a
complete conquest by one literature of another, or rather complete trans
ference of one and the same breath of letters from one country to
another as is presented in the familiar instance of Greece and Rome.
Vysa did not put together the Hahbhrata because he had learned
to know and admire the Iliad and Odyssey. Kdambar is not modelled
on anything in Greek literature as the odes of Horace are modelled on
the strains of Sappho or Alcus. The influence was partial and indirect
not direct and all-absorbing : and analogies to the Sanskrit romance are
to be looked for not in the plays of AJschylus and Euripides, but in
the Greek that was spoken and read and was popular, in the years that
immediately preceded the final expulsion of the Greeks as a political
power from the peninsula.
In the second place, wherein does the difference lie between Kdam
bar regarded as a work of art, and the tale which we have seen good
reason to believe is in one sense the source of the work. The one is a
tale pure and simple, such as are to be found in all languages, exist
ing only for itself, deriving all its interest from the rapid but at last
extremely monotonous array of more or lees extraordinary incidents. In
our book these incidents, or such of them as did not seem unsuitable,
are made the mere framework of a representation of human passion
which for us is all that animates the superstructure on which it is
based. These dry bones live : but it is because breath has entered
into them, einews and flesh have been laid upon them, and they have
been covered up with skin. It is hard to put the difference in words :
but if the reader will turn from the description in our book of Kdambar's love to the lines in which that subject is disposed of in the
Kath-sarit-egara, he will, I doubt not, feel it for himself.
With this preface I proceed to select and translate from the popular
Greek literature of the fourth and fifth centuries after Christ passages
for whose resemblance in general tone, and sometimes even in expression
to our book I ask the consideration of my fellow scholars. Let
it be only further premised that if a resemblance which cannot be
regarded as a mere coincidence is established, it does not appear to
be open to argument that Greece is the debtor and not the creditor.
The whole page of Greek literature from Homer to the Byzantine
influence affected other branches of the literature as well, even though we may
be unable at prsent to trace it directly elsewhere."Weber's Indian IAteratwre,
p. 251.
12G
historians pleads against such an hypothesis. It is not of course

questioned that in the country where men " spent their time in
nothing else, but either to tell, or to hear some new thing," there were
many curious enquiries into the wisdom and learning of the East. And
with such help as the Greeks themselves give us, it is possible in their
philosophy to put our finger on ideas that are non-Hellenic. But these
are details that do not affect the general question. From its glorious
beginnings down to the time when it overflowed the boundaries of the
Greek world, Greek literature was a purely native growth.
The date assigned to Achilles Tatius is 450 a.D. In his romance
containing the love story of Leucippe andCleitophon, I have marked, on
a cursory inspection, the following analogies to descriptions, sentiments,
and ideas that are of constant occurrence in Bna, while no trace of
them is found in the story of Kdambar as liana read it in the
Vrihatkath of Gundhya. I quote from the Trbner Edition of the
Erotici Scriptores :
"The maiden's chiton covered her breast down to her middle; the
lower part of her body a chlaina concealed. The chiton was white, the
chlaina purple, her body gleamed through her garments.
*
*
*
Her breasts peeped forward but a little : the girdle that
drew together her dress and breasts confined the two in such fashion
that the dress became a glass for the body." (P. 39.)*
" I looked at the Love who was represented as leading the bull.t and
said, ' Child as you are, you rule over heaven and earth and sea.' "
(P. 39.)
" Her mouth a rosebud when the rose begins to open its petals.
I looked I was straightway undone : for beauty pierces sharper than
any dart, and through the eyes finds its way into the heart. It is by
the eye that the stroke of love enters. A tumult of emotions held me,
praise, astonishment, fear, shame, boldness. I praised her stature ;
stood awe-stuck at her beauty, feared her heart ; gazed unabashed ; felfc
shame to be so moved : fain would I have induced my eyes to turn
away from the maiden ; but they would not. They laid hold of the
^^'^^' *>+1'1|' ^''* fr4ri^lriftj*rsrTftrft<ll<tfdri*i *|-?Tif[Sr *|^^5??1?1*<.

(Kdambart, p. 128.) An interesting paper might be written on the concep
tion of tmalo beauty among Sanskrit medioeval writers, in which it would not,
I think, be difficult to trace a greater analogy between Greek and Sanskrit
thought on that subject than can be easily oxplainod by independent similar
appreciation of an idontical type in the two countries.
t The subject U a picture of the rape of Europa.
127
tackle of beauty,* and by its help, offered a stout resistance : and,

in the end they conqnered." (P. 42.)t
"'How then,' said I, 'may I light upon this oracle: tell me how to
begin : for you are one of the initiated while I am a novice ; you have
experience of the service of the god. What should I say ? What do?
How can I obtain my love ? I know not my way here.' ' Seek not,'
said Clinias, 'instruction in this matter from another; the god is his own
interpreter, and a cunning interpreter to boot.J Newborn infants need
not to be taught to feed of themselves they know what pleasing table
is spread for them in their mothers' breasts. And the young man into
whose heart the seed of love has for the first time dropped may be
trusted to bring it to the birth without assistance.' " (P. 49. )
" Being then minded to incline the heart of the girl to love, I began
to talk to Satyros, taking my cue from the bird. For my love chanced
to be crossing at the moment with Kleio, and had stopped to look at
* " She knows her man ; and while you rant and swear,
Can draw yon to her by a single hair."Dryden.
t 3î%|: ftCipTprôr f%f8HI4%ifTtR-T4r frfMd<.rtdK*ik"W!ul

''4\ ^^ (T^JTrfpr '^%- ^^ $\
fl<ulfHI4qr-rf il? CÎ^Tf'Tfri&f^ S#Pft fH^THt^TcTTfl %f^r3T4T3Rl%rrr^ \ ^ aiRRFTTHT^ ^\\\ ttfbrifa fcrtcT-
tr^ftfa $$ $& % It^r ^+^ ?(^*5;'%;1%11^^ ^rt^r %* (%4Rr^ <1 (44PRT4fafcr ^^^ ^!* % sm\nTHf
? <*^ rTlfrrf^T sq?r^T5(KdambaH, p. 141.)
7 4T*4HT:gt rT: TFrT 1*? ^ r&T f^T-
f^T ni4*irs4f?4' Tftfmfcr apffjf^r ^ wnt

.HTftr iftf ( j*fPr % "< f^^t? *$V4
aOTTf't 5?%4 ^W W- %4 ^ ^ W*4UWftfi\ %
1|'*. I ^fîrWHî'fli ^ T^fa i% ^rfrfr T'T'Pr 4V$f
ft4IW4lPr ^ ^ ^ ? ? flt ^' (Kdambart, : 147 .)
t Moro literally ' is (in each heart) a self-taught master of his craft.' The Greek
avToSi&aKTor is the Sanskrit |^|*}.
ft *r . I %<<1<4^11|1$1 4^.3.
3"T rmwrmfeft ^' sir^^rrfH * 4?5f?5^ <irtfl*
^''^ *<'|': *^% (A'ddambar, p. 143.)
128 )
the peacock. And fortune willed it that just at that moment the bird
should unfurl all his beauty, and spread the glorious show of his
plumage. ' This,' said I, ' the bird does not without a certain art
of its own. It is a lover. When it wishes to attract its mate
it bedecks itself thus. Look, there she is beside the plane tree,'
and I pointed out the female bird' it is for her he now shows his
beauty.'
.
.
.
Satyros perceived my intention and the
drift of my words. ' Love truly has power,' said he, ' to send its flame
even into the hearts of birds.' 'Not only into the hearts of birds,'
said I, ' it is no wonder that he can do that, since he himself has wings.
But he darts his flame into the hearts of creeping things, plants, nay,
as I think, even of stones. Does not the magnesian stone love iron.
If she but see it she draws it to herself, as having within her something
of the nature of love. Consider whether the coming together of the
stone and the iron be not the kiss of the loved and the lover? As to
plants, the children of the wise have a story which they would call a
myth, if it were not that the children of husbandmen the same
thing. The story is this : Every plant loves some other plant, but on
none does love lie heavier than on the palm tree.* They say that some
palm trees are male, some females. The male then loves the female,
and if she chance to be put far away in the order of planting the lover
pines. The husbandman becomes aware of the sorrow of the tree, and
mounting where he can see all around, he marks in what direction the
palm tree bends. For it leans towards its love. Seeing this the hus
bandman cures the tree's complaint; he cuts the shoot from the female
palm, and grafts it into the heart of the male. He thus refreshes the
soul of the tree. Before it was ready to die, but now it takes fresh life
and stands erect, rejoicing in the embrace of its love. This is the
marriage of plants.' "f (P. 56.)
As certain of our own poets have said : and none more beautifully than
Heine
Ein Fichtenbaum steht einsam,
Im Norden auf kahler Hh'.
Ihn schlfert : mit weisser Decke
Umhllen ihn Eis und Schnoe.
Er trumt von einer Palme,
Die fern im Morgenland
Einsam und schweigend trauert
Auf brennender Felsenwand.
129 )
It would be easy to multiply examples from this author, and to add

others, at least as striking from his contemporaries, but I hold my
hand. The argument is not one whioh can be made any stronger by
an indefinite multiplication of individual instances, if the first fail to
convince. Kor indeed has it been my object to convince others of the
truth of an hypothesis which is still to my own mind little better than
an hypothesis that may be worthy of consideration. I have desired here
merely to call attention to what appears to me to be a marked resem
blance, and to the conclusion which it is possible to draw from that
resemblance, if it be once granted, as I think it must, that the writers
of the Indian renaissanoe period were not outside the all-embracing
influence of Greek letters.
r^mt ^ favrrfrr I *1?||'--*1<<|? | \( ^*f?rsu I fftfq' ^ (&un surtir l smf ^\^m { ? I r% ^r

5*^<. I (Kddambar, p. 157.)
17
A SECOND REPORT
OP

April 1883March 1884.
BY
PROFESSOR PETER PETERSON.
EXTIRPA.
ZETCTIbBIEla - *T
or
JOURNAL OF THE BOMBAY BRANCH OF THE ROYAL

ASIATIC SOCIETY.
18 8 4,
BOMBAY :
SOCIETY'S LIBRARY, TOWN HALL.
LONDON:
TRBNER Co., 57 & 59, LUDGATE HILL.
CONTENTS.
Report
gg
Extracts fromMSS. belonging to H.H. the Maharaja

of Alwar, &c
91^ J
Extracts from MSS. purchased for Government ...112 163

A Digambara Pattvali
163166
List of Vedic books belonging to H. H. the

Maharaja of Alwar
List of MSS. purchased for Government
167 183
(1) (29)
JOURNAL
OF
BOMBAY BRANCH
OF THE
ROYAL ASIATIC SOCIETY.

EXTRA NUMBER.
Second Report of Operations in search of Sanskrit MSS.

in the Bombay Circle* April 1883March 1884. By
Pbofessoe Peteeson.
For three months of the year under report I was absent from India,
having been delegated by Government to attend on their behalf the
Sixth International Congress of Orientalists, which assembled at Leiden
in the month of September. During the remaining period of the year
I was unable, on account of other duties, to go on tour in search of
manuscripts, except in the short Christmas vacation. Of that I had
previously determined to take advantage, in order to visit Alwar
(Ulwar), a place to which my Jeypore friends drew my attention in 1882,
when however I was unable to visit it, and which was one of several
localities kindly indicated to me as likely to prove fruitful by Dr. Bhler,
with whom I had the good fortune to be able to confer at Leiden.
On the eve of starting I was sorry to learn that H. H. the Maharaja of
Alwar, to examine whose library was the chief object of my intended
visit, was, with Col. Peacocke, Political Resident, absent at Calcutta.
Dr. W. W. Hunter's good offices there secured the immediate
despatch of telegraphic instructions to the State officials to allow me
access to the library as often, and for as long periods, ae might be
* The Bomba)' Circle includes, besides the Presidency of Bombay, Itejputana, Central India, and the Central Provinces.
OPERATIONS IS 8 OF SANSKRIT USB.
convenient to myself. For the prompt issue of these instructions I em

greatly indebted to His Highness : as I am no less indebted toH. l.'s
officers for the hearty way in which the instructions were carried
out. I desire also to acknowledge very warmly the cordial welcome
and the valuable help given to me by Dr. Mullens, the Residency
Surgeon, who, fortunately for my object, had not accompanied H. H.'s
party to Calcutta. Col. Peacock e was subsequently good enough to
procure for me from the Maharaja's library the loan of several manu
scripts I had marked as important, and with regard to which I shall
have something to say in this Report. This is the second instance
in which I have been, as the Government officer appointed under the
instance of the Government of India to search for Sanskrit manu
scripts in Rajputana, allowed not only to examine palace libraries,
but to make a closer study in Bombay of selected books from these
libraries. I venture respectfully to hope that Government will observe
with satisfaction the liberal treatment I have thus met with, in that
very important respect, at Udaipur and at Alwar.
I arrived at Alwar on the 26th of December, and was able to give
almost the whole of the following five days to the work of going over
the palace library. Mr. Bastwick, in his Handbook of Western
Rajputana, speaks in high terms of the way in which this collection
is kept : and I have certainly seen no library which can compare with
it in that respect. Each manuscript is in a separate cloth, and an
outside label, placed where it can best catch the eye, gives the name
of the book and of the author. The manuscripts are arranged accord
ing to subjects in separate book cases : and bear numbers that tally
with the admirable catalogue compiled by the present excellent
librarian, Joehi Gangada. The tax we made upon this worthy
gentleman's skill was no light one : as, in addition to my own party of
four,* we were never without the assistance of three or four Sbastris
from the town engaged in examining such manuscripts as we could
not ourselves overtake. Book after book was handed to each member
of the party with a promptitude that would not have disgraced the best
kept London library. Joshi Gangada's only regret evidently came
when our work was finished, and we left the library to him and the
* Mr Bhagvandas Kevaldas and Mr Bamcfaandra, the Agent and Shastri of
the Search, accompanied roe on this visit to Alwar : and Pandit Dnrgaprogad
of Jeyporo was good enough to join me there. From all three I received very
efficient aid.
IN BOMBAT CIRCtB.
ision which, it is to be feared, is its normal state. I think it

h while to dwell on this matter, because it shows how little, comtively speaking, remains to be done to ensure the publication of a
ted catalogue of this collection, which could not fail to be of interest
cholars it large. The co-operation of a trained scholar would be
spensable to give such a book the value it ought to have : but
mechanical and most irksome part of the work is done. I was
:h gratified, in the course of this short tour, to learn from Col.
itton, Resident at Jeypore, that a similar suggestion, made in my
t Report,* with regard to the Jeypore library, had caught his
intioHT and that the Jeypore Durbar had cordially acceded to his
gestion that such a work should be undertaken forthwith. It has
r, I believe, made considerable progress. I hope the Alwar Durbar
y be disposed to follow this example. If I can render any assist:e in the way of advice or revision, I shall be most happy to do so.
The collection is not in its main portion an old one, having been
med chiefly by the enlightened Bani Singh, who died in August 1857^
is, as most Rajput libraries are, rich in astrological books. But the
ief interest of the library lies in the very valuable and complete
[lection of Vedic books which it includes. Pandit Durgaprasad, at my
juest, wrote out from the catalogue the names of the books in this
irt of the collection, and added, from an inspection of the books
emselves, the author's name, wherever that could be ascertained,
he list so formed will be placed in the Appendix to this Report. I
roceed now to give a short account of some of the books which I have
een able to examine.
Among other manuscripts of the Rig Veda there are four, two of the
, . ~. .
Samhit and two of the Pada text, which
our MSS. of the Rig Veda.
",..,.,
,
, ,
are described in the catalogue as belonging

the Snkhyana kh.t If this assertion is true, the Snkhyana
No. XU. of this Journal.
t In writing Snkhuyana'and not Snkhyana or the like I desire to sngjeat that it is not really necessary, and therefore is far from desirable to add to
he confusion reigning in this dismal matter of transliteration, by attempting
to represent consistently the various Indian sigas for the modifications of the
sound in the middle of a word. That sound as a rule in the pronouncing can
not escape from the form imposed on it by the sound with which it forms
a conjunct consonant. In uttering the words ' ink ' and ' rent ' we give voice,,
and cannot help doing so, to two forms of the n sound, whioh in the Indian
alphabet hve different sigas. But we suffer no inconvenience from the fact
OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OF SANSKRIT HSS.
redaction of the Big Veda differs, as will be seen, from the kala
redaction, the only one hitherto found, in little. The khila
hymns presented with the text in the Alwar book vary considerably
from those of any MSS. of the akala kh information with
regard to which is accessible to me. Dr. Biihler has warned me
that forgeries of the nkhyana redaction, generally importations
from the Deccan, are very common in Rajputana, and has also drawn
my attention to the fact that the system of marking theaccents is known
to have been different in the two Skhs. The Alwar copy of the
Samhit text, which I have had the opportunity of examining at lei
sure, is not a manuscript from the Deccan. The system of marking
the accents however is the same as that with which we are already
familiar, with one exception, which may be of some importance.
Throughout part of one of the Samhit MSS. the svarita accent is
denoted by a horizontal line drawn through the body of the syllable,
instead of the perpendicular line drawn above the syllable which
appears in the rest of the book. This, it will be remembered, is the
way in which the so-called dependent svarita is represented in the
Maitryan Samhit. Have we here, then, a genuine survival of an
historic method prevailing among the Snkhyanas which the copyists
have elsewhere discarded for one more familiar to them ?
The greater number of the khila hymns, as given in the first Alwar
Samhit manuscript, will be placed in the extracts to be appended to
this Report. Such other variations from the printed text as I have
come upon may be briefly noticed here. Khila I. (Aufrecht" II. 672) is
not given. The first four verses of Khila II. are given as part of the
sixteenth varga of the fifth adhyya, second ashtaka. (See Extracts.)
The two verses thus omitted from this version of the present khila are
the two verses borrowed, as has been pointed out by Mller and
Aufrecht, from the Mahbhrata. In the Pada MS. the varga ende
as in the printed editions, and the khila is as usual not given. The
MS. gave Khila III., but a page has fallen out at the place, leaving
the gap wj * (khila v. 1), ... . qgfcfanD (v- 6 of
following hymn). It may be worth noting that the last verse of the
preceding hymn (II. 43) is omitted, before this khila, in the Sarrihit
MS. The Pada MS. has the verse. The adhyyas in the MSS. of the
that our alphabet has one sign for the two sounds : and much labour to
writer and printer would be saved, if hero and elsewhere we could hark
back to the English model in this respect.
IN THE BOMBAY CIRCLK.
and second ashtakas are numbered throughout, from one to sixteen,

iode of reckoning which first recurs in the seventh and eighth
.
the end of the third ashtaka the first varga of the first adhyya of
next ashtaka is given, both in the Samhit and in the Pada MS., in
it is, so far as I know, an anomalous way. Both MSS., it should be
lerstood, are composed of eight separate books, each containing an
taka, and not all written at the same time, or originally forming part
me copy. In the Samhit MS. of the third ashtaka, after the words
i trityshtake ashtamo'dhyyah" the hymn Tvm agne havishnto is given, followed by the figure 1 and the title choravargab, after
ich is again put trityshtakam samprnam. The S. MS. of the
irth ashtaka begins with the second varga, originally numbered 1, a
ure which has however been altered into 2, and which may be taken
have been really an error, as the next varga is marked 3 prima manu,
the P. MS. of the third ashtaka the hymn occupies a similar position.
is there ushered in by the title " chora," and is followed by the
and the date. The P. MS. of the fourth ashtaka however repeats
e hymn in its proper place.
Khila IV. is given, but not as a khila.
imber.
It is placed within the varga
At the end of V. 49 the Samhit MS. has this parisishtam :
I 4f<ft II ?? jju!Ml<u**l 4* ft%T II ^'--
Khilas V. and VI are given outside the varga numbers.

Khila VII. is not given. At the end of VI. 44 (Aufrecht's VI. 45
perhaps a misprint) Khila VIII. is given within the varga number,
iid with no indication that it is a khila beyond the colouring matter
iat has been spread over the letters. The third verse of this khila
i omitted. Khila IX. is given in an abbreviated and incorrect form.
See Extracts.) This khila is not accented. Of Khila X. Aufrecht's
ixth and seventh verses are omitted. Khilas XI. (unaccented) and
ill. are given.
Khila XIII., with a different arrangement of the verses, and many new
eadings, is given as forming vargas 19, 20, and 21 of Ashtaka VII,
I. That adhyya accordingly has 36 vargas in all, instead of 33, as in
he printed editions.
OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OF SANSKRIT MS3.
Aufrecht's fourteenth khila is given within the varga number 27, and
with his verses in the following order: 3, 4, 1, 2, 5. His fifteenth
is given within the varga number 5. The Pada text here, it may
deserve to be noted, gives the first five verses only of the foregoing
hymn (X. 9), but adds the sign which shows that something is to be
supplied. The four verses which, in our printed texts, and in the
Samhit MS. lying before me, are tacked on to these are, as is already
known, a repetition of verses found in I. 23. Khila XVI. is given in
the same way within the varga number 8. Khila XVII. is given as
a khila. Khila XVIII. is given within the varga number 23. Khila
XIX. is given as vargas 15 and 16 of the seventh adhyya. Khila
XX. therefore comes at the end of varga 18, not 16. The first verse
of this khila stands within the varga number 18 : and the remaining
verses are given as vargas 19 and 20. And Khila XXI. stands at the
end of varga 34, not 30; and is here given as forming varga 35,
which, and not 30, as in the printed texts, completes the number of
adhyyas in that ashtaka.
The Medhskta, Khila XXII., is given as the tenth varga of the
eighth adhyya. For the form in which this and the three foregoing
khilas appear in this MS., see Extracts. Khila XXIII. is given as a
khila at the end of what is in this MS. the 48th varga of eighth
adhyya, itself being numbered as the 49th. Khila XXIV. is given.
Lastly XXV. is given with a large addition. (See Extracts.)
The eight MSS. which make up the Pada text are dated variously
Samvat 17101712=A.D. 16541656. Of the Samhit MSS. three
only are dated : the fourth, Samvat 1 76 1=A.D. 1705, the sixth, Samvat
1813=A.D. 1757, and the seventh, Samvat 1681=A.D. 1625. In the
last case the date is given both in figures, and in the memorial verse :
It is in the beginning of the manuscript of the eighth ashtaka of

this copy of the Samhit that the variation from the ordinary method
of denoting the accents to which reference has already been made
occurs. The svarita, whether dependent or independent, is marked
by a horizontal line put across the body of the syllable. Moreover, in
the case where a syllable with the svarita or udtta accent follows an
independent svarita, the first of the two syllables is not, as is required
by the ordinary Rig Veda rule, marked with the sign of the anudatta.
IN THE BOMBAT CIRCLE.
^ (10, 48, 7) is therefore written in this manuscript STft ^ T

^ 44^(10, 51, 9 ) becomes ^ i TT,, and rurf i * (10, 59, 7)
ese peculiarities, affecting.it must be remembered, the manuscript

e eighth asthaka only, receive additional importance from a cornon of the close of that manuscript with what is known as to the
rent endings of the Big Veda according to the various skhs.
><, in his catalogue of the Berlin Sansk. MSS., quoted the krik :
kalnm samn ity rich 'nty 'hutir bhavet I
Bshkalnm tu tachchhamyor ity rich 'nty 'hutir bhaTet II
:h gives us the beginning of the last verse of the Veda according to
akala and Vshkala recensions respectively. According to the
e scholar,* it is stated in the fenkh. Grih., 4, 5, 9, apparently as
of two or several conflicting views, that the Sarnhit to which that
a refers, ended with the same verse as the VAshkala recension. In
second Alwar Samhit MS., which I could only examine on the
t, the statement is made in the margin, but apparently by the
;inal copyist, that with Hymn X. 191 the recension of the Saisirya
nch of the Skalyas ends. yr*<-q$ftr<taTTT: :. There
ows the khila in the same extended form as in the other manuipt. In that khila, as we have it here, the verse tachchhamyor stands
the end of the first varga, which, in the printed editions, is also the
1 of the khila. This, it may be conjectured, was the point where
Bshkala recension ended. With regard to what follows, if it be
nuine, there may have been from the beginning some controversy as
whether it did or did not fall within the Snkhyana recension.
I have said that I owe it to the courtesy of H. H. the Maharaja of
war that I have been able to make a closer examination of this
anuscript than the limits of my visit permitted. Before proceeding
call attention more briefly to the rich nature of the remaining part
' the Vedic collection, let me add that I am confident that His High:ss would willingly lend, under suitable pledges of security and
turn within a reasonable time, any books a careful examination of
hich might be expected to add to our knowledge of the subject. I
all gladly be the medium of any such request as may be sent to me.
In addition to the commentary on the stra of Snkhyana by
inartiya, mentioned by Weber, (Berlin Catalogue No. 106 : Ind. Lit.,
* Indian Literature : Supplementary Notes, p. 314.
p. 55*), there is, among the books put down under the bnkhyanakh a Srautastrabhshyam by Varadatta, nartya's father. The
commentary on the Grihyastra by Nryana,f sou of Krishna, is
complete. The Prayogaratnkara by Daysankara is probably a
modern work by an adherent of the nkhyanaskh, who lived at
Siddhpur in the beginning of the present century. The Sudarsanasamhit, extracts from which will be found in the Appendix, does not
seem to be the work of that name mentioned in the Bodleian catalogue.
It is a commentary on a Grihyastra, presumably that of Apastamba, belonging to the Black Yajur Veda by one SudarsanArya,
who apparently takes Kapardin's commentary on the Apastamba
S rauta Stra as his model. The more proper designation of the book
would appear to be Sudarsanrya's Grihyattparyadarsanam.
Colebrooke mentions a work entitled Ntimanjar, as an instance of
a book on ethics, which draws its illustrations of moral maxims from
the Vedas, and quotes from their holy writ passages at full length.
It does not appear from Colebrooke's words whether he had seen this
particular book, of which Dr. Kielhorn has given a short account. J
According to Dr. Kielhorn, Dy Dvivedason of Lakshmdhara, grand
son of Atri, great grandson of Mukunda Dvivedawhose age Kielhorn
was unable to determine, closely follows and often copies the commen
tary of Syanchrya, subsequent to whom he must accordingly be
placed. The extracts from the Alwar copy of this rare book given in
the Appendix show however that what common matter there is in
Syana's commentary on the Rig-Veda and the Ntimanjar must
belong, not to Syana, but to Dy Dviveda. For the latter gives his
date in the last verse of his work. He finished the book on the first
day of the first half of the month Mgha in Samvat 1110=A.D. 1054.
* Weber's statement in the latter passage to the effect that a writer called
Dsasarman Mnnjasnu supplied three adhyyas of this commentary, the
original ones having been lost, appears very doubtful. The verse
does not, I think, mean more than that a scribe of that name had, for the
particular copy, supplied sucli letters as had dropped, whether from the care
lessness of the previous copyist, the ravages of ants, or such like cause.
t I find fwli4KI44 in my notes, which I have oorrected in accordance
with Weber's Notice No. 129. The Berlin copy goes up to the 11th section of
the second adhyya only.
J Indian Antiquary, Vol. Y.> p. 11G.
y Dviveda, who here calls himself the graudson of Mukunda

.cda, dwelt at Anand, perhaps the city in Upper Gujarat to which
i's father belonged. He was himself, it will be seen, contemporary
i Uata,* whom he may have known. It will be noticed that he
i his grandfather prabhu, and styles himself yuvarAja. I am unable
letermine whether more than a priestly dignity is denoted by these
es. In the end of the book he is also styled sattrakrit, dvyagnichit,
samrt. SamrAt, it may be noted, is not a proper name, any more
11 agnichit, along with which it is given with that meaning, in the
y under the word, in the St. Petersburg Dictionary. The. re
alices to the Berlin Catalogue relied on there show that samrAdlichit was a title alike of Or-SuryadAsa (Nos. 133 and 914), father
llama, author of a SAukhAyanagrihyapaddhati, and (Nos. 260 and
!0) of Prajpati, father of the well-known Vedic commentator
jnikadeva. In another place (No. 226) the same Prajpati is
led triragnichit. Our DyA Dviveda is in the same way dvyagnichit.
am his title yuvarAja his book is also called Yuvadpik. Dviveda
;aks of his proficiency in eleven ways of reciting the Samhitfi.f
The collection of Smaveda books is a very noteworthy one. Among
e extracts appended to this report I have placed the beginning and
d, not very intelligible to me, of darpanas or commentaries on three
the four gAnas of that SamhitA composed by Prtikara. The eightnth book on the list is a tk, by a writer who does not give his
ime, but calls himself son of Harisvmin, on 8 Ayana' s commentary
i the TAndya-brAhmana.J The other brAhmanas and the parisishtas
:' this Veda are, it will be seen, well represented.
Passing to the Black Yajur Veda, I note first that the second Alwar
>py of that SamhitA, placed in the catalogue after the enumeration
f the ordinary text, satnhitA, pada, and brahmana, is divided into
andas and prapAthakas, not into ashtakas and prasnas, a circumtance from which we may perhaps infer that we have here the
Ureya recension of that Veda. The rich collection of stras, with
heir commentaries under this head, will not escape attention.
Under the White Yajur Veda it will be seen that there is a com* The credit of tho discovery of Unta' s dato belongs to Professor Bhauilarkar. See his Beport for 1882-83.
t Weber's lud. Lit., p 60, noto 52, and the references there.
J Probably tho Ilarisvmm who himself wrote a commentary on the Satan,
thabrhmana.
10
plete copy of Uvata's commentary of the Vjasaney Sarahita in the

MAdhyamdina recension. Commentaries on the brAhmanas of this
Veda are unfortunately represented only by a small work, which is
entitled Mdhava's bhshya on the Mndala (brhmana). On the
other hand, the commentaries on the KAtyyana Stra are numerous,
and include complete, or all but complete, copies of the works of
Yajnikadeva, Ananta, Karka, and Pitribhti. Pitribhti's book had
not hitherto, I think, been discovered any where. Bhandarkar, in
1881-2, obtained for our collection a complete copy of Karka's rare
work. Of the two remaining writers Weber mentions only MSS. which
he characterises as exceedingly incomplete.* The copies in the Alwar
library should therefore do good service. For the Grihyastra there
are, among others, commentaries by Harihara, GadAdhara, Jayarma,
(Weber, p. 143), Karka, Devamisra and Mahdeva.
The Atharvaveda list is not so copious as those of the other Vedas.
The bhshyam on the VaitAnastra, a copy of which has been acquired
for Government, (No 18), is, I think, an acquisition of considerable
importance. (See Extracts.)
In my First Report I endeavoured to show reason for doubting
the correctness of the theory which refers
The Snhitvakamnudi of . ., . , ,
.. ,.
, -
Sri- Vidyabhshana.
DOtn tne metrical rules of the Kavyaprakima
and the running commentary in prose which
accompanies them to one author, Mammata. In the present book I
had the good fortune at Alwar to light upon a work which, if it does not
establish what I attempted to draw from the data previously available,
may, I think, be claimed as showing that four hundred years ago the
theory for which I asked consideration was, in some parts of India,
the current view. The Shityakaumud of Sr-Vidybhshana begins
with a verse from which it appears that the author was a disciple of
the Bengal religious reformer Chaitanya, who is the hero of the
ChaitanyacharanAmrita, and who was born about 1484 A.D. It will
be noticed that the verse corroborates the tradition with regard to the
conversion of king Ptatparudra Gajapati by Chaitanya, to which
Aufrecht calls attention.! The verse runs :
Weber's Ind. Lit., p. 141.
t Oxford Catalogue, p. 14S, Note. Aufrocht quotes Sterling As. Ees XV.,
28t : " It is added that about this time Chytunga or Chytan Mahaprabhu {i.e.
^) came from Xacldia in Bengal to visit the temple of Jagnnth, and
that he performed miracles before the Kaja (Prataparudra)."
11
ift ?rW ^fir ti
fariu'h't-lfa^- w i
TuRn^niig^rPil
' I worship that Vishnu the ocean of delightby whose mercy,
;n he dwelt among men in the form of Chaitanya, Gajapati was
ihed from his sins and in a moment found peace. Him none can
iquer : and yet his saints subdue him."
[ have not attempted to give the double reference here. The second
se is :
% rfai ' ?Trfr ' I

3^5 ^"rfW *1< II
"In this work of mine the learned will find (I) the stras Bharata
ote, (2) a succinct commentary, and (3) examples whose only theme is
rishna's praise: this is its title to their consideration."
The work accordingly then begins : NishpratyhaprripsitaparisanptikAmo munih samuchitam girdevm prftk pranamati. And stunts of alamkra are prepared to hear that the first stram is the failiar niyatikritaniyamarahitm with which the Kvyapraksa opens,
nt to which there is here an entirely independent commentary. The
jlophon of the first parichchheda, as the divisions of this book are
iilled, is iti bharatastravrittau shityakaumudytn kiivyaprayojanaetusvarpaviseshanirnayo nma prathamali parichchhedah.
Turning to the colophon of the tenth Book, I light upon another
\ct to which I am disposed to attach a good deal of significance. From
he occurrence, in all copies of the Kvyapraksa which I have seen,
if the words samprnam dam kvyalakshanam standing before the
:olophon ascribing the work to Mammata, I was led to suggest that we
nave here preserved to us no obscure indication that the collection of
metrical kriks was a separate work, with some such title as KAvyam
or Kvyalakshanam. This view has Sr-Vidybhshana's support.
For when the author of the present book has all but finished the task
he sets himself, he says :
s*rr<s<irlf%f f'ipr ehloHcrT
T*45'l%TrTV?q- farTT ^^ I
|f% 5 ^^ 5441^1
12
''And now I have explained the whole of the Kvyalakshanam [that

is, the book so called]. This is a short commentary on the stras of
Bhatata, which has been composed, with the help of the existing
commentaries of Mammata and others, by Sr-Vidybhshana." Then
follows the colophon : iti bharatastravrittau shityakaumudym
arthlamkranhpano nma dasamah parichchhedah.
When the author says that he has now explained the whole of
his text, he is referring to the fact that, like some other writers on
rhetoric, he closes his work with a supplementary chapter on matters
not discussed by the authority he is chierty following:
*Hftr ?, =*
" Krishna shine in my heart : Krishna through whoso mercy

nothing is wanting to his faithful ones."
In tho following chapter some rules which are wanting in Bharati's
book will bo expounded.
Without dwelling at present on the fact that the sage Bharata is put
forward as the author of the Kvyalakshanam, the common text of
the Kvynpraksa, the Kvyapradpa, the Shityakaumud, and
how many other books on alamkAra we do not know, I think it will
not he disputed that the way in which Sr-Vidybhshana refers
to Mammata as oue of several previous commentators on the book,
almost precludes the idea that he had ever heard of the theory that
Mammata himself wrote the kriks.
The commentator, who unfortunately does not give his name,
is still more explicit.*
After reverence paid to Krishna and
Vidybhshana, he tells us that Bharata threw into concise kriks the
science of poetry as it stood in the Vahnipurna and other works, and
that to explain these is the object of the Shityakaumud. A circum
stance in the explanation of the first verse leads to the interesting
conclusion that the book before me may very possibly be that written
prima manu, or by the author of the commentary himself. For he
starts by undertaking to make three meanings out of the first verse : an
attempt in which he fortunately breaks down when he comes to mean
ing No 3. He has then not only to draw his pen through the halfgiven gloss, but to go back and amend his promise, so that the word
* The passage will be found in the Appendix.
13
rd meaning " shall not appear. He tells ns that Ch'aitanya was

laramapreshthaguru of his author : and that by Gajapati is
it Pratnparudra, king of the Atkalas.
will be convenient to give here a brief account of some other
works bearing on the Kvyapraksa which
e - w been addcd to Qm collectioIli or have
come under my observation, during the
In a collection of books most cheerfully thrown open to intion by Nryanbhat of Jeypore, I found a work in which I at
? recognized thesource ofa passage in theKvyapraksanidarsanam
nda's commentary on the Kvyapraksawhich was very imperfectly
n in my First Report.* In the Kvyapraksasamketat that passage
3 as follows :
^PT^ 7^1,11
^ [ ^^': irrlpTPH qqM
U4\<\W **: 3Tfrnr**m T&t- Tt^rr

This I translate :
" So finishes a treatise on Poetics in which (esha") the reader has
esented to him as one whole the different disquisitions of the learned
that art : nor let him marvel, for the appearance of unity is due to
e skill with which these divergent ways of treating the subject have
this book been put together."
To which explanation of the first intention of the verse the note
the commentary adds, in the passage beginning etena, &c. :
"The verse also contains this meaning, (etena . . . ityarthah
ikty dhvnnyate,) that the author of the book for some reason or other
ft it incomplete, when it was completed by another writer with such
kill as to render it difficult to say where the one writer stops and the
ther begins."
* Vol. XLI., p. 22.
t Bhler acquired a copy of this work in 1875-G.
one author, Rnchaka.
In his list it is ascribed
14
From this it is clear, I think, that the verse in question has not
the bearing I took it to have on the relation in which the kriks of
the Kvyapraksa stand to the vritti which accompanies them. It is
written by the author who wrote the continuation of Mammata's un
finished work ; and it claims, firstly, for the work as a whole, the merit
of being a lucid compendium of the subject as developed by previous
writers ; and, secondly, for that part of the work which the second
writer contributed, that of being a skilful imitation of Mammata's stvle.
This way of taking the verse at once explains, and is corroborated
by, the anomalous position it occupies, in all the texts, before, and not
after the colophon to the tenth chapter of the book. It stands where
it does, because over and above its primary meaning as referring to the
whole work, it has a secondary reference to something occurring within
the last chapter itself. Tradition, as is well known, asserts that the
joining so skilfully concealed occurred at the section dealing with the
figure of speech called Parikara.
The chief significance, however, of the Kvyapraksasamketa, as
bearing on the authorship of the original work, in the colophon,
in which it is asserted that the book, which consists of the kriks, the
vritti, and a short commentary called sarnketa, is the joint production
of three authors, Mammata, Alaka, and Ruchaka :
In the colophon to the first chapter of the sarnketa, it would appear

to be further stated that these same three authors are here responsible
for a commentary on a work of their own :
This I would suggest is perhaps not to be taken literally, but as in

dicating Ruchaka's wish to write his commentary in his own name, and
in that of the two authors of the original work. A somewhat parallel
instance of what appears to have been a common practice is furnished
by the introductory verses to Mahendrasri's commentary on Hemachandra's Anekrthasarngraha.* We are now able to determine the
exact significance of the colophon of the work known as the Kavyapraksanidarsanam, in which this passage stands, it is clear, not as an
original explanation of the verse, but as a quotation from the Kvya* First Eeport, p. 51.
IN BOMBAY CIRCLE.
lb
iasarnketa. After making the quotation, Ananda proceeds to

ate it from other sources as follows :
*17 1 fTrT: >11*? "TfbFTiif: I
' I 4>|b44TiF f? rafa ^'^^

P-li fTrTPr frfrPTT itHddK: I
4'44,*1k<i% frit: 4TW .
^s it is said :
The book is Mammata's composition so far as parikara ; Alaka
osed, and inserted the sequel.
\nd another says:
This Kvyapraksa is indeed the work of two authors; and yet
learned find it full of savour ; it is like the fruit of a tree into
:h the branch of another tree has been grafted."
he colophon* of the tenth chapter of the Kvyapraksanidarsanam,
ould therefore now explain as offering an alternative title for that
<. Having regard to the text only, it may be called Mammata's
ryapraksa. Having regard to the commentary Ananda has here
ipiled or written for the text, the book may be spoken of, under
ther name, as lljnaknanda's Kvyapraksadarsanam.
nhis review of my First Report.fBiihler suggested that this reference
to another name, should perhaps be taken
. commentary on the
...,.
,
,,
i i j *
called Sara- as indicating that Ananda s work had two
luchchaya.
names, KavyaprakAsanidarsana and Sranuchchaya. To this conjecture Bhler was very naturally led by
^<44 : i
t Indian Antiquary, January, 1884. While expressing my obligation to Dr.
ihler for a review which has been of much use to me, I am bound to say
at I cannot accept Dr. Biihler's correction of my translation of the passage
which I see a divergence between the doctrine of the kurik and tho view
iheld in the vritti. Dr. Biihler construes the well-known definition of kvm as if tad adoshausabdrthau formed a clanse by itself, and sagunau wore
irt. of the subject of the next clause. This yields tho translation " Poetry
.nsists of words and sense free from faults, but such faultless words and
16
OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OF SANSKRIT MSB.
the fact that in my list of manuscripts acquired for Government,

the KiivyaprakAsanidarsana treated of in the report itself is entered
under the designation of SArasamuchchaya. That entry however,
I regret to say, was an error, due to a premature identification on
the part of my pandit, of the same nature as that suggested by Bhler.
The KAvyaprakasnidarsana is nowhere in this manuscript called SArasamuclichaya, and should not have been so entered.* I have moreover
in the interval acquired a. copy, unfortunately incomplete, of the
Sarasamuchchaya itself. This manuscript (No. 102) in 197 leaves
gives the first seven ullsas. In the remaining portion, 59 leaves, we
have the tenth ulliisa without either beginning or end. The colophon
of the seventh ullsa is :
? ^(" tpt : ii ^
The book therefore gives, firstly, bhatta Jayanta's commentary com

plete ; and, secondly, extracts, by way of supplement, from other com
mentators. The compiler's name, Ratnakantha, is given in the follow
ing verse prefixed to the greater number of ullsas :
sense as aro endowed with specific excellence (i e. with rasa or sentiment) are
in some cases poetry, though they may bo destitute of (i.e. not possessing any
apparent) alamkaras." In my translation I took adoshau sabdirthan, sagunau
anil analamkrit punah kvpi to be three collateral elements of the definition
of tad or kvyam. I snbmit that it is Dr. Bhler' translation and not mino
which is peculiar and inadmissible. I need not press the mistake involved in
confounding guna with rasa, two torms that are perfectly distinct. In the
way I am quite confident that tho vrittikflra's words yat sarvatra salamkfirau do not, aud could not, possibly, mean " that (faultless sense and words)
possessing alamkaras (are) always (poetry"), but rather as I have rendered
tnem "that thoy (i.e. sabdfirthau) must always have alamkaras." Com
pare Jayanta's commentary in the extract given below. As to the divergence
of view I do not of course forget that the kAriks imitate in some respect
the stra style, and that this one may havo been written with tho view of
being interpreted artificially. It must be matter of opinion whether such
an explanation will cover the case in point, where the one authority says
that poetry may exist in the absence of ornaments, a very sound view, and
the other that ornaments must always be present.
* I may correct hero another erratum in the same list. The entry of the
authors' names of Ko. 31 should bo rjsrrf^TTrfijJj- . uot *F4lri4>4t : .
IN BOMBAT CIRCLE.
17
he following works either contribute to the compilation itself, or

quoted in one or other of the works on poetics cited :
Abhinavagupta's Alochanam.
Amarachandra's Kvyakalpalat Kavisiksh.
Rjnaka-Alaka's commentary on the Alauikrasarvasvam.
Anandavardhana's Vishamabualil. A Prakrit work.
[Govindarja's] Kvyapradpa.
Jayanta's commentary, called Jayant.
Rjnaka Jayadratha's Alamkravimar.sini.
Panditarja's commentary.
Bhskara's Shityadipik.
Mahimabhatta's Vyaktiviveka.
Mukulchrya's Abhidhvrittamtrik.
[Mentha's] llayagrivavadha.
Rjnaka Ruchaka's Alaqikrasarvasvam.
Rjnaka Ruchaka's Alamkrnusriii, a commentary on a
Mahkvyam by Jalhana called Somnplavilsa.
Srvatsavarma's commentary, called Srabodhin.
Subuddhimisra's commentary.
The Uddyota.
The Jayasinhbhyudaya.
The Tattvaparksh.
The Tpasavatsarjantakam.
The Nrisinhapurna.
The Rasaratnadpik.
The Vakroktijvitam.
The Vistrik.
The Vrihatsamketa.
Abhinavagupta's Alochanam is the commentary on Anandavardhana's
hvanyloka mentioned by Bhler (Report p. 66). Amarachandra's
vyakalpalat is in our collection (Bhandarkar's Report, No. 424).
he mention of Rjnaka Alaka as the author of a commentary on the
lamkrasarvasvam deserves note. We have seen that if the KAvyaprailsasamketa deserves credit Mammata, Alaka, and Ruchaka were all
oncerned, in some way to be determined, but apparently in that order,
iith the composition either of the book itself or of its samketa. But
luchaka, or Ruyyaka as Bhler has shown, is the proper way of writing
his author's name, was the author of the Alamkrasarvasvam, and is
referred to in this book. If the Alaka who wrote a commentary
18
on the AlamkArasarvasvam be the same as the Alaka who had to do with

the Kvyapraksa, it is clear that Alaka and Ruchaka were at least temporaries. The date of the author of the Alauikrasarvasam has
been fixed by Bhler. He was one of those to whose judgment the
poet Mankha submitted his Stkanthacharita at the house of his brother
Alamkra, one of the ministers of Jayasinha of Kashmere (1 1291150
A. D.).
But if, as seems probable, Ruchaka and Alaka worked on an unfin
ished treatise on poetics by Mammata, Alaka more especially com
pleting the text, and Ruchaka writing the samketa, Mammata also
must have lived at about the same time or earlier, and his lower date
must therefore he put in the beginning of the 12th century. Founding
chiefly on the fact that Mammata, who has enjoyed a great reputation
both in Kashmere and in India for the last three or four hundred years,
is not quoted once by the earlier writers on alamkra, of whom he had
been treating, Bhler was disposed to place Mammata later than the
Alamkravimarsin, which Biihler takes to be a comparatively late
commentary (end of twelfth century) on a book (the Alamkrasarvasva)
written by one whom we now have some reason to believe to have been a
contemporary and pupil of Mammatn's. This adjustment of Mammata' s
date we shall see immediately receives some corroboration from another
entry in the list we are considering.
That Anandavardhana, (ninth century), wrote a Prakrit work culled
Vishamabnall, is a welcome addition to our knowledge of the litera
ture of the period. From its title the book may be conjectured to
have been of a nature similar to that of the Sambhalmatam or Kuttinmatam of Dmodaragupta (eighth century), of which some account
will be given in this report. A look-out should be kept for AnaudavarI liana's book.
The name of the author of the Alamkravimarsin is in this manu
script always given as Rjnaka Jayadratha. Bhler hasshown( Report,
p. G8,) that Jayadrathn, the author of a work called Tantrlokaviveka,
informs us that he was one of two sons of oringnra, called respectively
Jnyadratha and Jayaratha. The latter word is the form in which the
name of the author of the Alamkravimarsin is given in Biihler's
manuscripts of that work. Panditarja's commentary is new. * An
interesting quotation from it will be given below. Bhskara's Shityadpiki, or Bhskar, is also new. Mahimabhatta's Vyaktiviveka is
* Bhtlingk cites a l'audit aijneiuaka from Oppert's Catalogue.
IN THE BOMBAY OIRCL.
19
nteresting entry. In his notice of a small work called Saktiviveka,

ch purports to be part of a larger work called Padvkyaratnkara,
Gokulantha, Aufrecht tells us that his author cites the Chint, the Kvynpraksa, and Mahimabhatta. This last name Aufrecht
gests may be the origin of the corruption Mammata, as Rudrabhatta
y be supposed to have yielded Rudrata.* Professor Bhandarkar
pointed out to me that, according to the commentators, Mahimaitta is quoted in the Kvyapraksa, where his views with regard to
origin of the vyangya meaning of a word are refuted. It is worth
ice that Ruchaka, who does not quote Mammata, does quote the
aktivivekakra. (Aufrecht Catalogue, p 280.) But, as the matter
ads at present, we cannot with any confidence see here the wishedcorroboration of Aufrecht's identification of the two names, and of
view put forward above with regard to Mammata' s real date.
\. copy of Mukula's Abhidhvrittamtrika was obtained by Bhler
. 224), and has been described by him (Report p. 66). Jalhana's
hkavyam, the Somaplavilsa, and Ruchaka's commentary on it are
th new. Verses by Jalhana are cited in Vallabhadeva's Suhhshirali, and we possess a small Sktimuktvali by the same writer,
vatsalnchana's commentary on the Kvyapraksa, called Srabodhin,
mentioned by Hall (Vsavad., p. 54), who attributes it to "Mahesra, otherwise called Srvatsalnchana." That Mahesvara was another
me of Subuddhimisra, who succeeds Srvatsavarma on our list is
dent from Aufrecht's description of Subudhimisramahesvara's com;ntary on Vamana, called Shityasarvasvam. Hnll would appear to
ve confounded the two writers, unless indeed both bore the surname
ahesvara.
The Rasaratnadpik is quoted in Bhnudatta's Rasatarangin,
ufrecht's Catalogue, p. 213), and the Vakroktijvita in Ruchaka's
larpkiirasarvasvam, (id., p. 210). The Vistrik will be mentioned
parately below. The Vrihatsatnketa may be the book referred to
ove as the KvyapraksasaDiketa.
* It is certain that Enrlrata and Rudrabhatta are names for the same anthor.
at the theory that Rudrata is the genuino word, and Budrabhatta an attempt
make good Sanskrit of that, deservos consideration along with Aufrecht's.
is impossible for those who are engaged in this search to acknowledge their
ligation to Aufrecht in each single case where such obligation is due. I
iko this opportunity of saying that what little I have been able to do begun
ith a study of his invaluable catalogue, as it is likely to end with it.
:20
OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OP SANSKRIT M8S.
In considering this list of writers cited in the Siirasamuchchaya, I

hare left to the end Jayanta's commentary on tho Kvyepraksa
called Jayant, which Ratnakansha puts at the head of the commen
taries he is using. An incomplete copy of the Jayant was obtained
by Bhler at Bhuj (Report No. 21-1). The Siirasamuchehaya does
not mention Jayanta's date, but Professor Bhandarkar, who has recently
obtained our first complete copy of the book, has kindly informed me
that it was written in Samvat 1350=A. 1). 129-i. Of all our commen
taries on the Kvyapraksa therefore the Jayant, with the single
exception of the Kvyapraksasamketa, stands closest to what seems to
have been the date of the original work, from which too it was itself
separated by no considerable interval. The use therefore made
in the following passage of the expression granthakra, as applicable to
the author of the vritti, must be accepted as conclusive of the fact that
Mammata, whether or not and to whatever extent he used previous mate
rial in putting together his krikAs, was the real author of the book as
a whole. That centuries later a tradition should have sprung up in
Hindustan proper, according to which he took his text from a work by
Bharatamuni forming part of a Valmipurna, is a noteworthy example
of the break in the literary tradition of India below the Himalayas, of
which the false reading Dhvaka in this very book is a conspicuous
instance, and of the tendency shown by later Indian writers to exalt
the antiquity of their purnivs.
4TTT ? 3Tfrr,'fff |%^ 3Trqrr%^% frrpTPT TT ^ T rn-
TF-prfr ? nrrKf^ ^^ ***||<<(11?*)<:*1*'

74*$1 4ifb(^Rr ^^^ ffrf &1 ": 1* ? =
STr^frfTrTT ^/< TTHift ^^: fT -^*^: 55 ^rf-
^^ s^r *? *rcuiwr^ *"i*ie4f*ri*>n' ? - -- frf^TJr72%r fF-^4T4T^F^nT^5'-(;' TVr ? T4T ^ <hlHc4r^Wltfrfcr.if< ^ ? 1^^5^ 9rfWll^-
21
;?7%5| ^*41'?7 ? ^T'krt'+K'T: <*)1*11>^^^ aft [?^ wf -
HlRU % IfrT:
No further proof is needed for the reading Binasya instead of

Dhvakasya iu the illustration of the pecuniary advantages that may
result to a poet from this work. But it may be interesting, before
passing from Ratnakantha's Sarasamuchchaya to note that Panditarja,
in his discussion of that passage, expressly quotes the verse :
vte4r **|< " < I
^ *&** ^.^^: gif^rrTT: rft-t- rt*fqr arTFrT q- ^ 4t*?prnUI
in which the transient character of the king's gifts to Bna is con
trasted with the eternal fame Buna was able to give to his king.
So much for the Sarasamuchchaya. Imust complete the digression into
which it and the Maharaja of Alwar's copy of the Shityakaumud
have led me by as brief a notice as may be of three other commentaries
on Mammata's book, extracts from which will be found in the Ap
pendix. All three were seen by me in the house of NryanaBhatta of
Jeypore, a liberal-minded scholar and descendant of scholars, who took
great pleasure in showing me his ancestral collection. Of the three,
that by Jayarma would seem, from the other name of the author
given (Panehuana), to be by that Jayarma Panchnana who wrote
the Nyyasiddhntaml. (Aufrecht's Catalogue, p. 240.) In the
passage cited, Jayarma first mentions by way of prvnpaksha
the view according to which Bharata is the author of the krik
22
and Mammata that of the tk. Against this, Jyarama tells us,
it is urged that in the tenth ullsa the author of the kAriks,
when speaking of the figure of speech called Mlrftpakam, makes
a clear reference to a preceding part of the vritti. &%4;
" The Mlrpakam as in the previous case," that is, the figure Ml
Rpakam is to the figure Rpakam as Mlopom is to Upam.
But, say these writers, Mlopam is described in the vritti, and not
in the kriks at all, and we have therefore here proof that the author
of the kriks and the author of the vritti are one. Not so, replies
Jayarma : the figure Mlopam is alluded to in the krik, by virtue
of the word 4f. In that case, it is asked, why does the vritti expressly
say that the figure Mlopam is omitted from the krik to save space.
Because, replies Jayarma, when a thing is brought into a general rule
by virtue of the word =^, it still stands in need of more specific defini
tion. This is, of course, idle trifling. It is of more importance to
note that Jayarma, while disdaining his best argument, comes himself
to the conclusion that there was only one author. He adds the interesting
note that the occurrence in the Kvyapraksa of certain kriks which
also stand in Bharata's Samhit, does not make against this conclusion.
In these Mammata is to be held to be quoting the elder writer in his
text, as he has elsewhere often occasion to do in his commentary.
The commentary called Vistrik is by a writer who gives his name
as Paramnanda Chakravarti. I have recently obtained a complete
copy of this book on loan from H. H. the Maharaja of Boondi, and
shall be able to add a transcript of it to our collection if on examination
that seems desirable.
Lastly, we have a commentary on the verses given in the Kvyapra
ksa as examples of its rules, called Udharanachandrik, and the work
of one Vaidyantha, the son of Sr-llmabhattasri.
In his preface to the Dasarpa, Hall has occasion to give a list of
dramas unknown bv inspection to Professor
prâ""^: Wilson, but which- he himself had seen.
Two of these, the tandrachandrika, and
Anantadeva's Srkrishnabhaktichandrik are in the Maharaja's collec
tion. Of the former a copy has been acquired for Government. The
author is Jaganntha, who describes himself as the least, both in age
and in abilities, of the four sons of Ptmbara, a Maithila Brahmin.
Ptmbara was the son of Rmabhadra, himself a poet.
Jaganntha's work, we are told, was chosen as a new composition
28
fit to delight the critical hearts of the kings and feudatory chiefs who
had met to pay homage to Fateh Shah. Such occasions are frequently
referred to in the prologues of Indian dramas, and will remind the
European reader of Talma's presence among the crowd of kings at
Erfurt, or of the actors and actresses who helped Louis XV. in his
" conquests in Flanders." As a rule, however, it was the happy pri
vilege of the Indian monarch that as here he could rely on having a
new piece to grace his stage.
The Alwar collection contains also a copy of Anantadeva's Srkishnabhaktichandrik, which is mentioned by
The
rikrishnabhaktichandrika of Anantadeva.
jja)]) elK] a copy 0f wych js j trie library

.
.
.
of the Asiatic Society o Bengal.* Anantadeva styles himself the son of Mahdeva.
In connection with my visit to Alwar I have only left to mention that,
besides the Maharaja's library, I examined the collection of books
belonging to the three brothers, Pandit Bhavnand, Pandit Udaynand,
and Pandit Rmachandra, sons of Lakshmdhara, who was chief pandit
to Banni Sinh. I was received by these gentlemen with great cordial
ity, and every facility was given to me, including free leave to borrow.
Extracts from books in this library will be found in the Appendix fol
lowing the extracts given from books belonging to H. H. the Maharaja.
The Panchasyaka by Jyotirsa, (the author of the Dlirtasamiigama),
is, I suppose, the book of that name referred to in the Mahntakam.
The Goldbyya of an astronomical Siddhunta professes to be a part of
the missing and much sought-for Romakasiddhnta. I owe its proper
title, as given in the Appendix, to my pandit, Drgaprasda. The
other works cited are, as the collection itself mainly is, of an astrono
mical character. Lakshmdhara's fame as an astronomer and astrologist is still great in Alwar ; and his sons, one of whom has received a
good English education, keep up the traditional lore of their house.
Une of the last communications I received from them was a carefully
worked out diagram of the then approaching total eclipse of the moon
which took place on the 4th of October last.
I drew attention in my First Report to a poem by Dmodaragupta
styled Sambhalmatam, a copy of which
Dmodaragupta's Sam- j foun(j jn R
,
jeaf manuscr; ^ in
bhalimatam.
-m
Santniath s Bhanqr at Cambay. Through

the good offices of Mr. Shamrao N. Laud, Dewan Saheb of Cambay,
* Indische Studien, 1,467.
24
and the courtesy of Mr. Nugindass, the custodian of that library, I

have since had an opportunity of reading this book and am able to
give here a short account of it, before proceeding to notice some of the
works actually acquired for our collection throughout the year. The
Terse by Dmodaragupta, which Aufrecht cites from the SAmgadharapaddhati, is in the Sambhnlmatam. I have shown elsewhere that
Vallabhadeva also cites this buried poet in his Subhsbitvali. It will
be seen in the sequel that the Sambhnlmatam is quoted in the
KAvyapraksa. But Dmodaragupta's precise date is fixed for us by
the reference to him, and to this book, in the Rjatarangin * :
gift ' $ qtbfai ^

The king here is Jaypda (779-813), and the reference to Dmoda
ragupta follows immediately that with regard to Udbhata to which
Bhler has called attention.
The exordium is brief:
sir :: frera i
The story then goes on as follows. In that ornament of the Earth

Benares (Vrnas) where even courtesans, by reason of their orna
ments (chandra), and troops of attendant lovers (bhujaga), attain
likeness to Siva, dwelt Mlat, the pride of her profession, described
as a home of all gentle words, graceful gestures, genuine affection, and
intellectual culture. One day, when she had climbed on the terrace
of her house, she chanced to hear one sing this ry :
<^|: 5*.<**<| 1>|: II

And what was sung seemed good to her ; and she determined to seek
counsel in this matter of Vikarl, whose doors she knew lovers be
set night and day continually. This she did, and found Vikarl, who
is described as a woman the reverse of beautiful :
" f?H.rtH<WH fre?fJ *JH4f4iHiyi4i I
j t^ u| -d^-h rffT^fs* * ^ HI I *4 ^prt d % II
* I one this reference, as I owe so many others, to the St. Petersburg Dic
tionary.
25
3fa4<14i^<'f*<i !Mi<RKI*d<ilH47^ II
surrounded by her waiting women, and looking at some presents
which had been sent to her. Vikarl received MiilAti courteously ; but,
when she learned her errand, expressed her surprise that a woman o{
Mlt's personal charms described after the usual manner should
feel the need of other weapons. However, if so it was, Vikarl would
do what was required :
Mlat should then make it her first endeavour to gain the affections
of a certain son of one of the king's officers, who, in the absence of his
father at the army head-quarters, was the real ruler of a neighbouring
village. He was in himself desirableand here the poet lingers overa
companion description of the youth* and would prove a very mine of
wealth to Mlat. To win him she must use the services of a go-be
tween, who should, in language which Vikarl dictates, tell the young
man to what a state Mlat is reduced for love of him. Dmodaragupta's treatment of this well-worn theme was better known formerly
than it is now, as the following verse, which is quoted in the Kvyapraksa, will testify :
Mlt's proficiency in the literature of her profession is not to be

forgotten; and Madanodaya, Dattaka, Vitavritta, and Rjaputra arc to
be mentioned as some of the authors whose works she had duly
mastered. If all this does not produce the desired effect, the gobetween is to change her tone ; and upbraid the youth for his in
difference to one who has marked him out for such signal favour :
f% ^<4*4 1*|1: I
* His proficiency in the Kama Sastra is part of this description :
nrqfrr * Tf??lr II v. Il
t KamalAkara, the commontator on the KAvyaprakisa, cloos not know the
source of this verse, as he supplies a wrong namo for the hero, whom he calls
Mdhava, with an apparent referonce to Bhavabhti's MlatmAdhava.
26
fchHri^Wl (1 fTCTf^T ^fiTfT lfTW^n' I

This brings us to the thirteenth leaf of the MS., when there occurs
a gap extending to, and including, the nineteenth. In the beginning
of the twentieth the story is concerned with the fortunes of one
Sundnrasena, the only son of his father. Sundarasena had a friend
called Gunaplita, of whom it is finely said that as the sea rises and falls
with the waxing and waning moon, so did Gunapalita's fortunes
follow those of his friend. day Sundarasena heard one sing this
verse :
" They who do not know the dress and manners and language of
other countries, and who do not pay their respects to great men are
oxen without horns."
The thing seemed gond to Sundarasena ; but Gunaplita at first
opposed his friend's project with a description of the discomforts of a
wandering life, which is too quaint and life-like not to be given in its
entirety :
8* WtiJI^ ipr T^rr fo I

^ *: 4$I4iM 1 Ji'STpT II
*,*1^|[%|-^*11*1*: I
*^ ** * I
^ ^f Prafrfa vrrarv %
arf f^rerra^ *% * *\*-\:
srnran1 <1-* ] raf>

STT TIT ': 3T: 4H)po|l *?^4 I
Prrcsrra snrirrTw cftWrra iuum^*" i i

arerrara frr ^rat - *n? *
IN THE BOMBAT CIECLE.
27
TTft ^'- ^r II 3*44.
TfaÎ frfa: ??^ <* ^

*' A man like me is naturally ashamed to press a request overmuch ;
but listen while I tell what woes befal the wayfarer.
" Clad in tattered garments, dusty and travel-sore, he seeks at fall
of day where he may lay his head.
" ' Mother, sister, take pity on me. Do not be so cruel. Have you
not brothers and sons whom hard necessity compels to roam from
home.
" ' I will not break your house down before I go away in the morn
ing ; and do good people call that a house in which wayfarers do not
rest as if they were inmates of it.
" ' I will rest here but one night as best I can, and then go on my
way. The sun is set, where else pray can I go ? '
" With such piteous words in his mouth the wretch goes from door
to door, and is upbraided by the housewives, who answer thus :
" ' My husband is not at home Why do you prate thus ? Can you
not go to the temple ? He will not take a telling, but stands there.
How obstinate the man is.'
" And if by good luck some man yields to repeated entreaty, and
scornfully points out a corner of the house, saying, 'sleep there,' then
the wife quarrels all night with her husband, and says, * why have
you given shelter to this stranger V
" And her neighbour, fearing in her heart that she in her turn may
be asked to find food and the like for the stranger, comes and condoles
with her.
" My dear, it is not your fault : your husband is too good-natured :
but keep a good look out, for there are rogues about. I speak as
your friend.'
" And after presenting himself at a hundred doors, the traveller at
last gets a mess of porridge thrown to him by way of alms.
28
"His food is at another's will : the earth is his bed and the temple
his resting-place : such is the lot of the traveller : and for pillow he
has a brick."
But before Sundarasena could reply this verse fell on the ears of the
two friends :
<*$*H4yd4*ftfEyfi+HchMHK-3d*H HT II
" To the man who is bent upon the accomplishment of his purpose,
a temple is his own dear home, the earth a very pleasant bed, and the
meanest of food nectar,"
which, when Sundarasena, here called Paurandari, or son of Purandara,
heard, he vowed the singer had uttered his own secret thought, and
overbearing Gunapfilita's opposition, he set out. He wandered over
the earth, and was at last setting his face homeward when he came
to that monarch of mountains, Abu. f'-rWI^HKI'+ist T tlrt*l*lTmif? . Dmodaragupta's description of this holy hill is enthu
siastic ; but the MS. is unfortunately too defective here to admit of
quotation. I may be permitted to linger for a moment on the circum
stance that the first in all probability for many centuries to read a
poem written a thousand years ago was an Englishman himself resid
ing at the time on that sacred hill, which now, as then, is
" herrlich wie am ersten Tag."
Where the MS. becomes legible again (leaf 27), a friend is upbraid"
ing Hralat, who has lost her heart to Sundarasena, in spite of his
apparent poverty :
" ft^Tf^frT: T^Tftf fRr?r% |
ft s1^ ^kiû ^
rf^^f ^^^%^^ I
' y-Vi iTr^yferirfi'r ^ II

M 44*1 ?*1^< ^'': I
IN THE BOMBAT CIECLE.
29
In language which recals a passage in Kdambar, Hralat tells

her friend that the time for expostulation is past :
And at her entreaty her friend conveys to Sundarasena some inti

mation of the condition to which Hralat had been reduced since first
she saw his face :
?* ^ ^^^
Sundarasena listened, and was moved to pity and to love, on which
his friend Gunaplta read him a sermon, which is not inferior to the
well-known one in Proverbs. I give some extracts by way of illustra
tion :
P?m tbfOf ^ *; \
<1 '1*><'**1: I
^^ Wim 4 i
2 ^ iT^HPfc^ II 3 II
- 'ifa^rar V
': îft^HIti S fq-rf II ^ Il
4WUHT4?TT: ^>#1 g I
%* %Rr mrtti $ JTfrar i
^^5 qÊKMtfr iff*: II II
^ fnrf%^' r ^^*>5 II Il
^WfHfarn' t M4+ii5 1
3f& 4fir'r !**1|*1 ii
*< f^ ^'' i
StWT *irl*1: TRrraT ^rfWft II V II
^-= *!? i
fr?r>T*nrr ^^^^ ^ 1 1
^^ STCTTfirT^îrV II V* il
MS. -
30
ff^rSFTPTttf 3Tft ^^îftRf^lr: ( Il 4.Y II
^1^^'?'*^.- qflRj"q jq- I

^rf^T f? *? r=4TS4RTsHgiNrtwftwr: Il \\
^ *? 1? r^f^Piî^TI^T [0
4rtr44llu|: W- % %*$& Tf^FT: Il \
Wil*5*! nr grg^H)* ^ 4<nlf ^ I
f^f^ [] ^5TlO *5? ^f V
4Wri*iTT * Rf?* * =?r 1
^chMWlfalrtr ^TnfNTV * II *
2*>*: iffif ^41<.|: I
^-^': grfrfr ^1T4T4TV II 4o
^^riyiin^niT " Ppraf^ R^fnt "4% I
irfnf ^ ^ irsRTSTTf ^ ^^ \
<rw-. f9ir Tf Hfr ^ 33 II
% R mfr( : fT^r II r* Il
9 might had its due effect, had not Sundarasena, who seems
to have heen much at the mercy of wandering minstrels, at that
moment heard one thus proclaim the opposite doctrine :
tT*4 Wfarffd 4 -ifai ^f?T3?r ^ I
qfwfrT r 1?1? 5 ^ *R II 4* II
S^Rft *IH4.rt *ftT%d4>ri*irl44 *F$m I
^?f<N*i<fl-*Hi<?HIO^SN dl*u<4 II ^ 4
<: ^: iI^lfT II 4$ "
Declaring that these sentiments might have been' drawn from his own
heart,' Sundarasena sets off to comfort Hralat. The intimacy he
straightway contracted with her lasted for n year and a half, at the end
of which period he was startled from his dream of pleasure by the arrival
MS. .
t s. -.
31
of a messenger, by name Hanumn, who handed him the following letter

from the indignant Purandara :
3T^?r^f,:jTrrar'*4wi4c|u4?T ti
ff ^?*>?4A, '^ ? I
S ^rf%4I?431'wjr *f*ftflMWI4M4lH. I
ff^ ^5*<*^*; II
8> ?1:^^0 gfrTrr^Pt%fftf [ I
*1<|<<1 ^4vT gfmw ffff ^: Il

=34^^ Ttf : &^^^ I
^frt4rl<Tr garran-: ^rq- c^mTfjrTT | II
? 1 ^^ 1(1^ I
Tgt'T'rvrHH fr firf^ *|^. 1 1
f% ^^^* ^^^: I
?^ ff^T d"4 Tirt|'+f|fr*H'*KrlR'n' I
*4IW4?frl ?Tf^rrHHf^cH wf|*HHfl4. I
While still in his first perplexity over the contents of this upbraiding
letter, he heard one sing as follows:
^^^<^$**[4<4.||. I
tfT JFlPT^^TÊT^rwT^T^ 57> II
His friend, too, took occasion by the forelock, and pressed him with
reasons why he should bend him to his father's will.* His previous
The veree 3ffa%^, which Aufrecht (Z. D. M. G. 27, 35), quotes from the
SArngadharapaddhati, occurs here, with the reading 3fipm;:.
32
advice had not been taken, but ff f? ?^ 1*|"1 :a

good man does not weary in offering wise counsel to a friend. Sundarasena is bid contemplate his father's sorrow, greater than that of one who
has no son. He is reminded how obedience to one's parents, an honour
able wife, the society of friends, and attention to religious duties,
together form the secret of true happiness. Above all is he adjured to
look on this picture and on that, as he contrasts the harlot who has
enslaved him with the wife whose company he is forsaking for her. It
is here that the picture of a true and loving wife occurs, to which, as
quoted in the Subhshitvali, I have elsewhere drawn attention :
^^ îf %^ >ftrrr
4 r\ ^^ i
r^THHfTil**IWr ^".Hdl'q % 5 II
" Fr nichts besorgt als meine Freude,
Fr mich nur schn zu sein bemht,
Wollstig nur an meiner Seite,
Und sittsam, wenn die Welt sie sieht ;
Dass unsrer Gluth die Zeit nicht schade
Kamt sie kein Recht aus Schwacheit ein,
Und ihre Gunst bleibt immer Gnade
Und Ich muss immer dankbar sein."
Rundarasena goes, but Mlat, who had sincerely loved him, after
following him a day's journey to bid him forget her, dies under the
kshra* tree, where their sad parting took place. Sundarasena returns,
pays the last rites to his dead love, and himself becomes an ascetic.
^ %" f^t i^rr 1 1

The saying, still I beliovo current in Northern India, that those who accom
pany a departing friend should turn back when they como to water or to a
kshira tree, explains an expression in a fine verse by Taraiiinandin given by
Aufrecht Z. D. M. G. 36, 613 :
ITrSTr3RC4r^rHdl4l'lt<fertb^+
4: ' must bo translated 'hre is a kshra tree.'
IK THE BOMBAT CIECLK.
83
Such a story as this Vikarl now says should serve to show that
women of her profession and Malati's may sometimes be disinterested.
With this she turns to the main purpose of the poem, into which I
may be excused for not following her very far. The art she treats of
is distributed under various heads, of which dhanoprjana, ' how to get
money,' nisbksanopya, ' how to get rid of an impoverished lover,'
and bhinnasamdna, ' how to recover a lover (grown rich again) with
whom you have once broken,' are the three first.
Mention was made, in my First Report, and in the Introduction to
Soraadova's Yaiaatilaka. my ( f Bb&* Kudftmba. f a >rk
purporting to be of an historical character,
by a hitherto unknown poet, Somadeva. By the courtesy of Kanakakrti, the owner of the old MS. which I saw at Oodeypore, and through
the good oflicesof my friend, Shymaldas KavirAj, member of II. H. the
Maharana's Council, we are now in possession of a modern transcript of
this book. It has not the historical importance which I at first attribut
ed to it : but in other respects I hope it will be recognised as a work of
no small moment. Its date is Saka 881 =A.D. (J59. It presents a
lively picture of India at a time when the Buddhist, Jain, and Brahminical religions were' still engaged in a contest that drew towards it the
attention, and well-nigh absorbed the intellectual energies, of all thinking
men. It is full of quotations from famous poets mentioned by name.
And it has to be added the Yasastilaka is in itself a work of true
poetical merit, which nothing but the bitterness of theological hatred
would have excluded so long from the list of the classics of India.
For Somadeva was a Jain : and the main purport of his book is a reli
gious one. Held in high honour down to the present day by the ad
herents of his own communion, he has been thrust out, as I shall
show, from the place once assigned to him by critics of a more catho
lic spirit.
I proceed to give as detailed an account of the Yasastilaka as 1 am
able to extract from the single MS. at my disposal. It is unfor
tunately very defective : but I am promised a second MS with a
commentary, on obtaining which I shall be able to supplement or correct
what follows. So soon as sufficient material shall have been got to
gether, I hope to include the book in our Bombay Sanskrit Series.
I must begin with an admission of error, which will at the same
time explain what I have said above of the wilful injustice that has
been done to Somadeva. In discussing Bna's reference to the Akhy
34
yikras, whom he mentions immediately after VyAsa, in that enumeration of his more famous predecessors and contemporaries with which
the Ilarshacharita opens, I had occasion to refer to the definitions of
khyyik and Kath given by later writers on rhetoric. In the
Shityadarpana the definition of Kath is :
K*4i4 " ^5 ^ rrfH
The illustration is "As for example in Kdambar." The illustra

tion, if, as is reasonable, we are to take it as applying to the essential
definition, and not to the last clause, in which a superficial and
accidental qualification is tacked on to that, is, it must be confess
ed, an ill-chosen one. For Kdambar is not a book that can, by any
justifiable stretch of language, be described as a prose work with
an intermixture of poetry. Apart from the introductory Terses there
are only two occasions throughout the book where the prose style is
for a moment broken through. From that premise I argued that the
meaning of the first line was that a Kath is a " relation in prose, with
here and there a stray verse or two, of matter already existing in a
metrical form." This was against Pramad-dasa-mitra's rendering
" In the Kath, which is one of the species of poetical composition in
prose, a poetical matter is represented in verse, and, sometimes"
A perusal of Somadeva's Yasastilaka has shown me that the Babu's
rendering is open to no other charge than that of a slight ambiguity of
expression. The Kath, or tale, is a species of prose composition, and
what is stated with regard to it here is that its distinctive feature, that
in which it differs from other prose compositions, is that whenever the
subject matter becomes overcharged with feeling (sarasam), the prose
style is deserted in favour of poetry. This is a description wholly
inapplicable to Bna'a Kdambar, which is the only example given
by name. But it is an exact description of the style in which
Somadeva has written the present book. I conclude that the definition
of Kath was drawn up at a time when the literary pantheon of India
opened its doors to adherents of all creeds : and that Kdambar
was dragged into the explanation by later fanatics who abhorred the
Jain and his works, and could find no better illustration among
the books left to them of a definition which they were too conservative
to abandon.
35
The introductory verses are given in full in the Appendix. They

are followed by the familiar kritam ativistarena, whose appearance in
such a connection puts an end to the doubt sometimes expressed as to
the precise significance ofthat and similar phrases. Kritam ativistarena
here can only mean " it is useless to carry this Introduction any
further." The story then proceeds as follows:
There is in Bharatakshetra a land called Yodheya, a land so fertile
that its happy inhabitants are not sufficient to cut down what they
have sown, to stack what they have cut down, or to gather into barns
what they have stacked*
The capital of that country was Rjapura, and the king, Mridatta,
a son of Chandamahsena, of the House of Hari. Mridatta had the
misfortune to come to the throne in his youth : and the early years of
his reign were devoted to sensual pleasuref and athletic sports. On
the day on which the story opens, Mridatta had listened to the advice
of his family priest, Vrabhaira, and had determined to propitiate
Chandamridevat, the goddess of his house, by the slaughter of a pick
ed pair of every living species, up to and including man himself. That
crowning sacrifice was to be performed by Mridatta in person: and
he sat expectant in the temple of the goddess, when his guards sud
denly presented to him an ascetic youth and maiden, whom they had
selected as fit objects for the sacrifice, and had enticed rather than
* ( ^ ; i^f^ I
This is the first sarasam vastu, and the proso style is accordingly laid aside
to be resumed again immediately.
T Described as usual with much zest by tho moralist who is hastening to
condemn them: ^|^^,^|?3 ^^^':
^-*: ^[$S4-fan*;ftrcf *#| >^?->1:

tpnfiS firsr'-irftiH*^!: *%nW 1^?^7^: ? - The passage seemed worth giving on account of the enumeration of
the countries which combined to stock the prince's seraglio. In the same
context there occurs also the first of a series of -allusions to the Trikamatam,
that form of Siva worship (the pratyabhijn or anuttaramatam) to which so
many of the famous poets of Kashmere adhered. Mridatta was like one
initiated into that faith,
36
dragged to their doom. But at the sight of his destined victims a

strange change came over Mridatta. The cloud passed away from
his mind.
Here the scene, by an abrupt and artistic transition, is changed to
the outskirts of the town, where that day a Jain sage, whose " new
name"* was Sudatta, had arrived, in the course of a missionary tour
with his disciples. The tour had been long and toilsome, extending
from countries of burning heat to countries where the cold at nights was
so intense that the women folk however angry do not forsake their
natural-resting place. The description of Sudatta's pupils, and their
various employments, contains, among other things, a reference to the
various grammars in which they were skilled, of which the Aindra,
the Jaineudra, the Chandra, the Apisala and Pniui's are named.
Avoiding a garden, as a place too dangerous for one who would keep
his senses under control, + aid a burning ground as a needlessly repul* " Anil I will write upon him my new name."Revelations 3, 12. Sudatta's
name before baptism is nowhere given.
Sudatta fortifies himself in his intention by calling to mind a host of sages
whom the temptation of a moment has hurled into sin. Of these the first, it may
just be noticed, is represented as succumbing to the snare to which, with hoi ter
fortune, Sir Guyon is exposed in our own Fario Queene,
yj% ? |"%"1-
= r^fir^l ^ :. Thon follow some verses :

I ulTrTqrfT: 5jfEr<T: Wff-
^'^^^ II
[ pfiiFft : 1 I
^"S^f <i i d + Rqrn II
* rcfrT ^-
* Tmrfr 7ftfT3Ti ? - Il
FW ^Tirfff^fl^T '^: I
^TrT'^^rTf 44f?T ffl^f 4TJ 3* ^: '
IN BOMBAT CIRCLE.
87
sive place of resting, Sudatta, whom a knowledge of the king's ruthless

intention prevented from so much ns entering a town where the houses
of many adherents were open to him, made up his mind to rest for the
night on a small hill ' crowded with sages,' and bade his followers dis
perse throughout the neighbouring villages. In his retinue there was
a twin pair, boy and girl, whom this king's sister had borne to Prince
Yasomati, son of Maharaja Yasodhara. These two, born in the purple,
had, by some means or other, been enabled to overcome the forgetting
which for other men is the invariable accompaniment of the sleep
called birth. They knew all that had happened to them in the lives
through which they had traversed. The knowledge brought with it
the conviction that earthly happiness is but the field* whereon is sown
the seed of sorrow to be reaped in later lives, and they had left all and
followed Sudatta. And now the sage, knowing of his heavenly wisdom
that the sight of them would soften their uncle's heart, and deter him
from his purpose, bade them go where he knew they could not but fall
in with the king's guards. They were the picked pair of human beings
who now stood before Mridatta, and for the first time realised why
they had been brought there. For the king
^red ffrnrror II
The boy looked anxiously in his sister's face, afraid that she might
give some natural sign of timidity.
But, as has been said, no sooner had they come before Mridatta
than his mood changed. He let the sword, already uplifted, fall from
his hand. He bade men seat the youth and maiden in a place of
honour in front of his own seat. He listened while they invoked on
their protector the blessing of heaven : and when they had ceased, con
jecturing in his own mind that the royal pair before him were his sis
ter's children, of whose entrance into the ascetic life he had heard, he
meekly folded his hands, and asked :
f% irjr i
5 3TT: '- II
9^5^1:|^5,1^ ( jftfnrgTR)
38
OPBRATIONS IN SEARCH OP SANSKRIT MSS.
" What country gave you birth ? What House? How is that a boy
and girl who can have tasted nothing of the pleasure of this life have
been minded to leave it." To this the boy replied:
An answer which, as far as its first part goes, it is not out of place
to note, was repeated only yesterday in a London police-court.* The
last clause here4^ft( >Ts3f3 ft "^: occurs also in the Kirtrjunya, canto III. This concludes the first svsa of the booK. The
second begins with the strange tale which the young sage unfolded to
his mother's brother Mridatta. In the land of the Avantis there is
the city called Ujjayin, where of old reigned king Yasortha. His
fnvourite and true loving wife was Chandramat of your own race.
To them, after long and weary waiting, the gods at last gave a sou. I,
oh king, was that son, and they called me Yasodhara. I was still a
youth when my father Yasortha, having caught sight of his whiteniug locks, and taking that to be the messenger to him of his approaching
death, married me, set me on the throne, and retired into the forest.
In the third svsa the youth tells how he held converse with
his ministers, one of whom has occasion to quote famous poets of
bye-gone days. As for example, Tarunllvilasa, Kavikaumudcliandra, Vidagdhamugdha, Ntisena, Mnadhanatnjaya, Kavikovida,
Abhimna-Mahdhara, Avydhidurbala, Kusumyudha, Sujanajvita,
Mugdhngankelikuthala, Vilsinlochanakajjala, Srasvatkartavakautuka, Praudhapriypnganavotpala. These names, all, so far as I
know, unfamiliar to us, remind us of the similarly formed names in
the anthologies. We shall see immediately that Yasodhara and his
house were Buddhists, which is perhaps the clue to the sphere within
which such names were common. All these poets sung of the vital
importance to a king of the choice of ministers he makes : and their
theories on that subject are eagerly supplemented by tales of the dis
asters wrought to kings through an evil choice. Ananga, the king of
" I have two names.
My English name is
, and that in the faith is
" Where did yoa get that name ? Were you baptied ? "
"' I would rather die in this court than tell my family affairs, which are
mattora between me and my God." Home News, Jaly 4, 1881.
89
Kalinga, allowed his general, Divkrti, to stir up the hostility of all the
neighbouring princes, when the enraged subjects rose and slew their
monarch. To the employment of unworthy persons Karla, king of
Kerala, Mngala, king of Bangla, Kama, king of Kausika, and Sphulinga, king of Vanga, could trace their ruin. Scarcely less melan
choly is the list of those headstrong princes, who, come to the throne,
sent their fathers' counsellors into retirement, to their own destruc
tion. As, in Magadha, Makaradhvaja, in Knga, Kuranga, in Chejti,
Nadsa. In this connection mention is made of the Bharatabla,
and of pandita-Vaitandika. From this subject the speaker passes
to indicate, by the familiar artifice of an enumeration of the ambassadors
present at his court, the glory he enjoyed while he lived his life as
Yasodhara, king of Ujjayin. From Gujarath to the Himalayas the
neighbouring countries owned his supremacy, and the Kerala, Chola,
Si inhala, princes, with those of far Nepal, desired to be on friendly
terms with him. In the description, which follows, of the way in
which the king spent his days, the question as to the hour at which it
is proper for a king to take his chief meal is thus satisfactorily dis
posed of:
4HI<4ulf fr% frfk- .JTOcHrr
T *: wfTf ^ II
" Chryana would have him dine at night ; Timi when the sun sets j
Dhishaya elects midday ; and Charaka stands for the morning : to my
mind there is but one rule in the matter that he should dine when
he is hungry."
Lastly, it may be worth while giving a letter issued in king Yasodhara's name, as necessarily possessing some of the interest that would
attach to a genuine letter of Somadeva's own time :
*4fi*T ^ d R| <)\ & I <1 * H rt : 5Fr4rir3<*lO*liM: %?%*^1 ul <* I AflHHVn^ *1 -4 1 * ^ftT^riTVTT^4lyi^lH$Htf*>5'i4M4iMf 4rtl44Rr*lrtfJI,mPri'^|rtl<r^-
^: Ir^rer^r^: !%^#^?<|: t^wt^rt
40
OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OP 8ANSKRIT MSS.
JHFRTTTtfT: =($(&5 **: |%**- iRafRkSK: *?*)" 4mR*ItMWb: ^'^*: #T: #%<.1'11^|*1%
ffr?5'T'1'4|^; SRT%IT"
HTjfi- ^?5%^'^^: ^51,?%^^ WTI>-
Thus king Yasodhara spent his days, the happy possessor of as much
glory and as much pleasure as can well fall to the lot of man. Most
of all, like a true Rajpoot, did he delight in the chase and in war, and
his chief study was in the Veda of the Bow :
" There be many weapons which men use, but among them all is
none like the bow : it reaches all and is itself not reached of any."
But all this glory and enjoyment the discovery of a moment was to
bring to an immediate and shameful end. As he lay, with eyes all
but closed, between sleeping and waking, one night, Yasodhara was
startled to find his queen gently draw her arm away from under him,
and after an anxious look at her husband, rise and steal away iuto the
darkness as one bent on an unholy deed. Smitten to the heart with
fear, Yasodhara took a sword from the hands of one of the men in
waiting, and followed his wife, to find her in the embraces of one of the
grooms of the stables. His first impulse was to kill them both as they
lay, but, mindful of the scandal that would ensue, and of the evil that
must, in consequence, fall upon his subjects, he controlled himself,
went back to his room, and made no sign even when his guilty wife, in
fancied security, came gently in, and crept into his arms again, ' as a
snake creeps into a bush.' But in the morning the aged Chandramat
heard that her son Yasodhara was about to follow the example of her
husband Yasortha, and forsake the world.
The description of the vairngyam, or detachment from the things of
this world, into which this event plunged Yasodhara became afterwards
41
famous, and is expressly quoted in the Shatprbhritafck, a book which

will be noticed later. It is, of course, characteristic of Somadeva's own
time that the unhappy king is represented as revolving in his mind one
religious system after another, beginning with Buddhism, in the hope
of finding comfort for his woe.
He was resolved to abandon his kingdom ; but not unmindful of
the scandal such an act might provoke, he devised as he lay sleepless
a storv of an evil dream that should account for his intention. In the
morning he went to his Council Hall, where the Queen-Mother joined
him. As they two sat in talk, a reader struck up the following
strains :
n^- * <*fadi*HH &- |^*1 f^ ^ '

" Of all women folk Age* is the one most to be desired ; her embraces
cure, not engender, the lust after the coquettish glances of others of
her sex."
^ * *r#tsrf%
^\^ I
rlM-*. f^r %^^: %* ||
" While old age still leaves your body young ; while as yet darkness
has not overspread your senses ; bethink yourself, and do that one
thing needful in which no sprout of another birth shall rear its head."
4fttaHui<$KiHAî4j-
TS <* 44 II
" foolish heart ! Night and day thou dost torment thyself, thick
wrapped in the darkness of desire about house and goods and wife and
fleshly lusts ; and seest not the rod of death falling even now without
warning upon thee-t"
* Feminine in Sanskrit.
+ " And he spake a parable unto thorn, saying, The ground of a certain
rioh man brought forth plentifully; and ho thought within himself, saying,
What shall I do, because 1 have no room where to bestow my fruits ? And
he said, This will I do : I will pull down my barns, and build greater; and
there will 1 bestow all my fruits and my goods. And 1 will say to my soul,
Soul, thou hast much goods luid up for many years; tako thine ease, eati
42
OPERATIONS IN SEARCH 0 SANSKRIT MSB.
The thing pleased the king, and he bade them give the reader royal
largesse. His mother, who had already marked the change one short
nightto her a hundred yearshad wrought on her son, anxiously
asked the reason of his mood. In her heart she guessed the real cause
for she had often remonstrated with her son on the license he allowed
to his wife ; and she had even heard rumours of the hump-backed
groom on whom the queea smiled. But she accepted the story of the
dream ; and implored her son not on that account to throw away his
kingdom for the ascetic life. Rather, if so small a thing as a dream
disturbed him,* let him propitiate the goddess of their house with a
sacrifice of all living creatures.
Nor let him call such a sacrifice wanton murder. It is expressly
sanctioned in the scriptures ; and against such a sanction the ordiuary
rules of morality are powerless.
^f 44T*TfT \ rtll**' fr ??
^ ^ Trf?r i
^$^1111< ' *
: ; ? I
The king clapped his hands to his ears. What is there, he asked
himself, which superstition, born of ignorance, will not declare to be
right and good. With his mother, however, as a woman, he was at
first unwilling to argue. But she reminded him that by her husband's
favour she had been something more than a mere mother of sons and
daughters. She was versed in affairs ; and demanded now to be con
vinced of her error, if that might be. The king began by reminding
his mother that this was not a matter which concerned himself only.
His care was for his people too.
drink, and bo merry. But God eaid unto him, Thou fool, this night thy soul
ehall be required of thee ; then whose shall those things be, which thou hast
provided ? So is he that layeth up treasure for himself, and is not rich towards
God ?"Luko xii. 1621.
* t ft m t%t=t: rj - ruft " What man, not a fool, getting rico in a dream, will so much as hold out
bag for it."
48
^^^ *rsrr ?mr inrr

" If the king be righteous, they are righteous ; if he be wicked, they
are wicked ; if he be neither good nor wicked, such also are they ; they
walk in the way of the king : as the king is so are the people."
In Vanga land (Bengal) Brahmins drink strong drink,' because the
king does the like. For a similar reason the Praskas (Persians)
wed with their own mothers, and the people of Simhala (Ceylon) do
what Visvmitra had to do when he made his world (i.e., marry brother
to sister).
With this prelude the king besought his mother to believe with
him that to harm no living thing was the first and greatest of all the
commandments.
|)^1: 401-W3! &: ^
" do no murder on man or beast ; to covet no man's goods ; to

speak the truth ; when occasion calls,to give freely according to one's
means; to keep one's tongue from talking of young women in public ;
to dam up the stream of avarice ; to honour the old ; and to be com
passionate to all beings : this is the common doctrine of all the books
of the law, the path which all declare leads to happiness."*
So Vararunhi has declared. And Vysa, Manu, Bhradvja, in his
Shdgunaprayoga, VisAlksha, and Bnaf say the same.
Hearing this, the Queen-Mother perceives that her son is blown
about with the wind of Jain doctrine. J Though convinced that a god
himself cannot free from that strong delusion those whom it has once
laid hold on, she makes a violent attack on the doctrines and practices
* ^" : -&C. The verse is given byBhtlingk (No. 4310) from
Bhartrihari. That scholar takes ^''?: Tt'HIef. "le meaning of
which is not, I think, very clear, somewhat differently, translating it " to keep
silence when people are talking of Iho young wives of others." Bhtlingk
reads 4K4, f^Hlr- aud fW-, 8 fflTf^:, ^ <T*4T:-
t : ^: Kd., Bomb. Ed., p. 32. Bhuradvfija and Varhamihira are also expressly quoted.
X *vrt i ^st * >r trfft ^ f^ ftp 4fHm?r &c.
44
of the Digambara or naked Jains, and asks how they who hold in
honour neither gods nor the spirits of their fathers, who neither wash
nor sacrifice, can hope to see salvation. The king gently points out
that the spirits of his ancestors have either entered other bodies, or
have passed away into the land of spirits. In neither case can they
stand in need of, or derive any profit by, oblations, which, as a matter
of fact, crows and other birds devour. Nor will a wise man readily
believe that water can wash away sin.
TOf i
tMI$4*w7*HI: * ^^: I
" If the going down into, and coming up from, river, lake, sea, f>r
tank in itself made for virtue, heaven would belong first to the living
creatures that move in the water, and after them to others."
" Therefore hath he said :
" Men beside themselves with passion, hatred, illusion, or who are
captive to a woman's will, may bathe in sacred places for ever but will
not be pure."
So much for the traditional religion. With regard to the contempt
the Queen-Mother feels for the faith which he has embraced, the king
quotes two passages from Varhamihira in which the naked sect of the
Jains is mentioned by that catholic writer with the samo apparent
respect as that paid to other religions.*
So also in the poems of Atsava, .Bhravi, Hhavabhti, Bhartrihari,
Bhartrimentha, Kantha, Gundhya, Vysa,Blmsa, Vosa, Klidsa, Bna,
* I find the first of those passages in tlio Brihat Samhit Ix. 19 (Kerun p. 328)
bat with a different reading. Aa Somadeva quotes it, it runs as follows :
^ WV ] fff#4T fiVr%
^ 1lrj4ari|t: : T4"C4T fl^ff: Il
from the PratishtAki n da.

Tho second, from the Nimittakflnda I have not traced.
tT^ritTTTfl r4T*i : I
45
Mayra, NAryana, Kumra, Mgha, Rjasekhara, and other great

poets, when occasion serves, is honour done to this religion. As like
wise in Bharata's chapter on Kvyam,* and in folk-lore. Nay, is
this not the popular view as expressed in a common saying :
^?TT % ?*' <*?% ^tfrT : Il

" There are four oceans in the natural world, hut six seasons ; so the
religions are four, hut philosophical theories are six."
So the debate goes on, somewhat tediously it must be said, till at
last the Queen-Mother is forced to confess to herself that the time is
gone past when she could hope to instruct her son :
? ^7*|1* w^r* *? II
"What can instruction do for thee who art at once modest and
learned ? Will any wise man make offering of salt to the salt sea ?"
As a compromise she proposes that not a live cock but one made of
flour should be sacrificed ; and this the son is, after a struggle, reluctant
ly fain to concede. His guilty wife hears of what is intended, and
proffers the request that she should be allowed to superintend the
cooking of the victim after it has been offered, f This request could
not have been refused without scandal ; it is granted : and the queen
takes the opportunity to get rid both of her husband and her motherin-law. She mixes poison with the flour, and mother and son die
together.
In the fourth AsvAsa, of which I need not give an abstract, we
are told of a series of transmigrations into the bodies of various
animals, to which Chandramat and her son are exposed for the very
venial offence of having done violence to life under the form of a sym
bol. As fate would have it, in each of these transmigrations they are
brought back together to the court of the young Yasomati, whom his
* *Hd4ufW -- Tho reference mu3t be to a part of Bharata's
work which has not yet been recovered.
t The victim was offered to tho god, but oaton by the priests and worship.
pers. Compare, " And the priest's custom with the people was that when
any man offorod sacrifice, the priest's servant came, whilo the flesh was in
seething, with a flesh-hook of three teeth in his hand : And ho struck it into
the pan, or kettle, or caldron, or pot ; all that the flosh-hook brought up tho
priest took for himself." 1 Samuel ii. 13.
46
father had placed on the throne before making the fatal oblation. For
Amntadev, now in her turn queen-mother, is reserved the darker doom
of repeating through each transmigration her original crime of murder
on the pair. At last the fatal circle has been completed. Chandramat
and her son have again been born into the world of human beings, as
twin son and daughter of the young Yasomati, by the sister of the
king whom the youth has been addressing. To this life they have
wakened with a full knowledge of all that has gone before ; and their
one effort now is so to pass through it as to secure their final deli
verance. Let but Miiridatta listen to their master Sudatta, and he must
needs go and do likewise.
This svsa contains several interesting quotations from older poets.
Here is a verse by the Mahkavi Bhsa, of whose writings any scrap
has unfortunately its value.
" Long life to the trident-bearing God who found out and revealed
to men this way of salvation, that wine was made for drinking, woman's
face for looking on, and fine garments for wearing."
To his nephew Yasastilnka's exhortation that he should resort to the
sage Sudatta, Mridatta cheerfully yields ; and with the fifth svsa a
different division of the book begins. In this part of his work it was
evidently Somndeva's intention to provide the pious Jain layman with
a popular hand-book of devotion that should be supplementary to, and
explanatory of, the sacred texts. The last three svsas then of the
Yasastilaka constitute a separate book, styled the Upsakdhyyanam,
and divided into forty-six kalpas. The first of these, the samastasamayasiddhntvabodhano nma kalpah, in which Sudatta is repre
sented as beginning his instruction by an enumeration of the existing
religions, I have printed in the Appendix. There, too, will be found
the titles of the remaining kalpas.
In the end Mridatta, with the goddess he ignorantly worshipped,
and his subject-people, embraced the Jain faith, and after living happily
on earth, were after death translated to the world of the gods.
The colophon of the book, which is in my MS. unfortunately corrupt,
traces Somadeva's spiritual descent through Nemideva to Yasodeva
47
and tells U9 that the book was written in the year 882 of the Salta era
A.D. 950. It was written when Sri Krishnarjadeva was reigning,
at the court of one of his feudatories, the eldest eon of a Chlukya
prince named Arikesari. This is the prince who was the patron of
the Kanarese poet Pampa or Hampa (Mr. Rice in the Journal It. As.
Soc. XIV.), and the allusion to him here as a Chlukya affords import
ant corroboration of the credibility of a writer who has been too lightly
assailed. The following valuable note on the bearing the passage has
on the Early History of the Deccan has been kindly contributed to
this Report by my friend and colleague, Professor Bhandarkar :
" In the colophon it is stated that the poem (Yasastilaka) was com
posed after 881 years of the era of the Saka king had elapsed, on the
13th of Chaitra in the Cyclic year Siddhrthin, while the eldest son of
Arikesarin was reigning. This prince is spoken of as having sprung
from the Chlukya family, and as a prominent Mahsmanta or feu
datory chief depending ou Krishnarjadeva. Krishnarjadeva reigned
gloriously, having subdued the Pndyas, Simhala, the Cholas, the
Cheras, and others.
" In the Canarese Bhrata, written in 863 Saka by a Jaina poet of the
name of Pampa, Arikesarin, of the Chlukya family, is mentioned by
the poet as his patron. The historical information given in the work is
thus tabulated by Air. Lewis Rice. (Jour. R. A. S., Vol. XIV., N. S.)
Yuddha Mallamoon in the sky of the Chlukya Vaihsa.
Arikesari(n)invaded Nirupama Deva.

Narasimha.
I
Dugdha Malla.
I
Baddigaseized Bhma.
I
Yuddha Malla.
Narasimhaestablished Erapa in a kingdom, defeated and purf
sued Ghrjara rja.
Arikesri(n)defended Vijayditya against Gojjiga ; ruling in Saka
863.
" Gojjiga is spoken of as Sakala Chakravartin or paramount sovereign
of all. This Chlukya family is said to have ruled over the Jo|
48
country and Tuligere or Huligere, the modern Lakshmesvara in the

Dhrvd district was its capital.
" The Arikesarin mentioned in the Yasastilaka is clearly the last prince
in the above genealogy ; and the paramount sovereign Krishna, whose
feudatory his son was, must have been Krishna III. of the Rshtrakta family. For his dates are 867, 873, and 878 Saka (Early Dekkau History, pp. 57 and iii., Supplement), and the date given in the
work before us is 881 Saka. The relations of other princes of
this Chlukya family with other Rshtrakta sovereigns are given in
the above table. Nirupamadeva, whom the first Arikesarin is said to
have invaded, must be Dhruva Nirupama, whose brother Govinda II.,
or perhaps he himself, was on the throne in oaka 705. (Early Dekkan History, p. i., Supplement.) So also Gojjiga, against whom Arike
sarin II. defended Vijayditya, must be Goviud IV., who, in an inscrip
tion mentioned by Mr. Fleet, is called by that name. (Ind. Ant., vol.
XII., p. 249.) While Govinda IV. was thus a contemporary of
Airkesarin, Krishna III., the sou of his immediate successor Baddig
or Amoghavarsha III., was the suzerain of his son. And this is
consistent with the chronology. For, as I have stated in the Early
History of the Dekkan (p. 55), Baddiga being Govinda's uncle, must
have been a very old man when he succeeded to the throne, and conse
quently could have reigned only for a short time. Vijayditya, the prince
defended by Arikesarin, must have belonged to the Eastern Chlukya
dynasty, since Govind IV. was at war with that family. He may have
been Ammarftja II., who was also called Vijayditya. (Ind. Ant., vol.
XIII., p. 248.)
"This Chlukya family thus appears to have been one of the several
offshoots of the early Chlukya dynasty, which ruled over small
principalities after the main branch had been deprived of sovereign
power a little before Saka 675 by the Rashtraktas under Dantidurga
and Krishna I. It governed over a province called Jola, a portion of
which at least is included in the modern district of Dhrvd, and owed
allegiance to the Rashtraktas, though occasionally it put itself into a
hostile attitude towards the paramount sovereign. The attempt to
identify it with the early Chlukya dynasty, or with its Vengi branch,
must, therefore, be abandoned. This offshoot of the Chlukya family
must have been different from that from which Tailapa, who vanquished
the Rshtarakutas, sprang, and also from that mentioned by me at
p. 58 of the Early History of the Dekkan, since none of the names in
IN THE BOMBAY CIBCLB.
49
the genealogy given above corresponds with any of those borne by the
princes belonging to these branches.
Krishnarja, who was reigning in 881 Saka, is, as we have seen, re
presented in the Ynsastilaka as a paramount sovereign of great valour ;
and here we have fresh evidence to show that Mr. Fleet's identification
of him with Nirupama, the younger brother of Khotika, and his expla
nation of the inconsistency between the dates of the two princes by the
supposition that Krishna was joined with Khotika in the government,
and was not a sovereign in his own right, are wrong."
It seemed convenient to take this Digambara Jain book of which the
above is a pretty full account, before noticing more briefly some of
the other works acquired for Government during the year under report.
These I now take up in the order in which they stand in the list which
closes this paper.
No. 57 is a find of no ordinary interest. The only Vramitrodaya
hitherto known is the bulky work in which
No. 57. A commentary Mitramisra explains, supplements, and ocon Yajnavalkva by Mitra.
r
rr
miera, calledVramitrodaya. casionally dissents from the Mitakshara.*
According to Bhler that work consists of
two kndas on Achara and on Vyavahra. As Bhler goes on to say,
"This would not be a matter of surprise if a third knda on .penances
(prayaschitta) were found. But hitherto only two have become known."
Of these only the Vyavahra knda has been printed- I do not know
whether the Achra knda, to which Bhler refers, is an elaborate
work of the same character as the Vyavahra knda or not.
But the present work is one of an entirely different character by the
same author, the Mitramisra, who flourished at the court of Vrasinha,
a chieftain whom Bhler has identified with " the well known Brsinh
Deo of Orchha, who murdered Abul Fazl, the minister of Akbar, and
author of the Ayn-Akbar." In three kndas chra, Vyavahra,
Prayaschitta, it follows and repeats the text of Yjuavalkya's law book,
and adds a short running commentary. Besides its intrinsic interest
therefore the work has an important bearing on Yjnavalkya's text, as
Mitramisra accepted it : and I have compiled the following table of
variations from the text as given in Stenzler's edition. Unfortunately
the present copy of the work is in a very fragmentary state. It is to
be hoped that later we may fall in with one or other of the complete
copies which undoubtedly must exist.
West and Bhler, 3rd ed., p. 21.
50
The Achara fragment begins with ten leaves (120 to 124, and 126
to 130) which give verse 28, and the first line of verse 29. In the
former of these two verses Mitramisra reads, in his text of Yjnavalkya,
^r-4M*U|cM: which, in his note he explains as ag^T t\\r\ $il^*ni
Si|KT^d:- As variants are mentioned 4tf4HU4<4)|: ( W4 * *flfW|Kf|ii: ) and ch<-tru|^*r: ( < ^: 5?$: ) For
the second line of verse .28 an alternative reading *: ^^:
1* 5^?*1 ( rf* PTf * *? 4* ) is given. One leaf
(22U) gives part of the discussion on verse 91. Nine leaves (316, 317,
319, 320, 322 to 32(5) take us from verse 1G5 to verse 181.
V. 165 Com. mftt: ^^^ 5^>:
f*s4. This interpretation of , wrong in itself, is inconsistent

with the following verse in which certain classes of Sdras are expressly
declared to be fit to eat with. The difficulty is felt, and met by the
remark <^^:; ** . So also the ^
after : in V. 106 is wrested from its real meaning = srvr-
v. ^^- v. l/i ftm^TrfffpT. v.
177 " V. 178 < '^. One leaf (402)

gives verses 285 to v. 290, which is here written :
tf * 4*f *% I
Lastly in ten leaves (4 '25 to 42, and -131 to 436) we have the
passage from verse 326 to verse 345.
V. 330 f^qr -^r'r. V. 331 frrft V. 337 5. V. 338

q^rgifiT, ^^'-. v- 340. qwite^ra^TRiPT^Ht. V. 341
T 44 4**tt f7%: CW?!Trl4rtH. V. 342 f%j| arf^H; 4 >The first complete leaves of the Vyavah/ira fragment (30, 31) give
verses 17 and 18. Next (leaves 92, 93, 95 to 100, 102 to lOG) we
have the passage from verse 79 to v. 95.
V. 79 g*. V. 80 j|HtUi- V. 82 5 *-.. V. 83 f^. V. 85
Lastly (leaves 148 to 153, 164, 165, 1/2, 173, 190 to 208, 212, 225
to 257) we have, with some omissions, the passage from verse 137 to
the end of the charakada.
V. 138 qmqimfrft. V. 140 vrarrr. (Vv. 144 to 156, and 100

to 187 wanting.) V. 190 JPgpKPl rfHt V. 197 **5\ V.
198 Tfi^q*H- (Com. [). V. 207 ^rjftaftyff w V. 212
IN THE BOMBAY CIP.CLE.
51
^fagWf^r. V. 215 3T4TSrr4 ^. V. 216 - V 217

TT.ftf. V. 219 |?*1\ V. 221 * - (Vv. 221b.
to 2 7 wanting). V. 22 '' V. 266 ?^*-:- V. 267
ST'"^ fi\ "^- v- -^8 stT^tV (misprint in Stenzler). V. 269
ijft- ^ 4pc M1W % - V. 272 spy ^^^-.- v278 *. V. 279 ?? qf^, ^^^. V. 281.
}5??. V. 28 1. %'". V. 285 pTf^sPfreî^t V. 286
. V. 287 ^. V. 28 ^-^sff. V. 292 is omitted. V. 293
* ?<:- V "2'J4 4+4*'4^T, *yrnii+*. V. 295 1?&*.
V L'96 ^^^, < ^^. V. 298 rreg^fTcf:. V. 300
V. 3J. Text writes last word f*T. Com. has gq||4| ^TftfrT 9f%4TT:. V. 30G ?>1 "1.
The Pryaschitta fragment begins (leaves 8 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19,
20) with the second line of verse 5.
V. 5 trfrfTr T =* V. 8 4TfWtef*. v- 11 f*4T STOaTi:- V. 14

Tsg-=rf ?*^- (Com. ^^^^^^
îrrr^T arr^r^pTÔ-
V- I5 affr?-
Com. mentions as a
variant. (Vv. 16 and 17 are wanting.) This part ends with the first
line of v. 20. Next come five leaves (52, 93, 120, 121, 126) which
yield the following various readings. V. 79 (text wanting). Com.
mentions the reading |fff^ PcCff^fS^W ^ ff^^^Pir Tf^Tr
3T*fh?T V. 105 ^r. V. 197 aTlWT:. V. 251 *rgTfj% 5T?T. V. 260
Lastly (leaves 131, 132, 134-136, 133151, 153) we have, with
a few gaps, the passage from verse 20'6 to verse 321.
V. 206 jspfoiT?. V. 207 ?srr^lf ^T- V. 269 $ . V.

279 =5%. V. 280 ^%f T ^^f V. 23 faifa. The second
line of V. 2-4 is omitted. V. 236 - v- 296 ^rjTcrgq-, gftwv.
V. 290 ^KSTcHfa * v- 3|J4 ^fT, ^^ *

To enable scholars in some measure to judge for themselves the rela
tion in which these two works stand to one another, I give in the first
of the following extracts Mitramisra's comment on Yjnavalkya .,
266269. The second is the colophon of the Achara adhyya. That
of the third and of the whole book is unfortunately missing.
I.
5 ft^TfTf fH**4-!|f TîT^rf 1
52
OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OF SANSKRIT .
^^ ^ 5*: II
S^P **4I 4TT*rT?4lflf^^: I
^5re4H<HTf| TG^rfr^yHr: Il
q<4c^JI^|"l ^ ^^ *^llu|: I
bq^^d! fqHts'-.<%44r II
*ft<4rfa%T I *^1?% ^^ m <ul 4 A4fa$* ^ ^ *& 4^t^ ffst^ *rv if ^riir ^tt't ^^ ^ ^rsjrfifi^mWTW: ifrf -51% ^^ &* *T ^^
f%?T*4ift criiTMTT^TFT^Tfrerrim^Prî: fr*^ *rt*it ^}-
?MwrfT^r^N<s(4T*ni<rni
fa*3*viw
^ R<t-
' - i ^*[* 11 i Kf^nr^rf^ ^ *T"fsSTfTrf 4*1*10 "Crntf^4^^7^" | 41 ^ ilrf "4*ltv ^TT^n^TRT ^rrRFr HMI^^Tf,!^. &?, rfiPnFi I
?r %?w Vi*4i *? <pr 4<: %.j ^ - ^^^^/
VH**4 ? ts- f%r 5 <=)*11*|1 =ffc^n? Il
rf%t 55 fr^r ^^^. Il
^%#^ *jrti<Hui "* redw^f^frTPWfr^r I
4lrlri4î
II.
friNrro^wfffi ^ r? ifvEnf&*n% ii
<WI-<l*H % T3t tl^lrt < ? I
^ ffTTl'V'T: 4^ *lul(^>d5 II
Pl%4T * ff^'t <<4IIH lrfr)4H< II
63
ifcfrf^qfH^rvKlTffr^ jj 4 ri (V*f 51^fl <1 efirsrnftC3'H*rtT'i(l4KHIi4lyul!J!fNwpT%>r5n^4-frff îNW^rt^l^t? 4ftThe VivAdArnavabhanjanam is one of the numerous attempts made
No. 61. The Vivadrna- b-v a body of Pandits gathered from far and
abhanjanam or Vivftcur- near to put out a satisfactory and final dinavabhanga by various
t of H d Lftw The '8 tfae
authors.
present case are, or seem to be, Blesvara,

Kriprma, Gopla, Krishnajvana, Vresvara, Krishnachandra, SrGaurknta, Klsankara, Symasundara, Krishma, Kesava, and Strma. The authorities they chiefly relied on were King Chanda and
the king of Dhr, Visvanipa, the author of the Mitkshar, Halyudha, Srikrishna, Vachaspati, the author of the Dharmaratna, Srkasa
Slapni, Govinda, Lakshmdhara, the author of the Tattva, and
Nchabhatfca. The book is probably the same as that bought by
Bhler for this collection in 1875-76, and ascribed in his list to one of
its joint authors, Gaurknta.
Nos. 72, 73 and 74 deal with Buna's Kdambar, and must form a
useful complement to the aids we have
Nob. 72 to 74. Glosses
,
1 c
.
j
j
v
on Btja's Kdambar.
1(1 for correcting and understanding
that text The author of the Kdambarpradesavivritti* (No. 72), the present copy of which is unfortunately very
carelessly written, is Sukhkara, a writer of whom nothing appears to
be known. There are no introductory verses. The book begins at once
with the opening stanza of KdambarCS^ n^tf
and the first gloss comes only with the ninth verse. The Guptas
of the 10th verse are said to be the kings of that house, beginning
with (Bu)dhagupta and Kumragupta. The Kadambarprvrdhavishamapadavivritti (No. 73) opens almost as abruptly with the sin
gle introductory couplet :
sn3 ^^[^-]? ht ^
<*fr^r ff% 1 1
The present copy of this little work has no author's name.
* MS. Kdambarpravesavivritti.
That is
Si
OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OF SANSCRIT M33.
however given in a copy already in our collection (No. 40 of 1871-72),

as Blakrishna, son of sr-BenkararauganAtliadkshita. The third of
these tracts is (No. 74) a tippanam on Kdambari by one Mahadeva.
Nos. 75 and 76 are two Jain avachris or commentaries on Klisimply
Nos. 7 and, m
7G. mTwo dasa's Kumrasambhava,
. .
~ botl) styled
' Jain commentaries on the Sutra vritti. No. 76 is defective.
Both
Kumrasambhava.
stop wt], tne seventh sarga. A hasty
comparison of N'o 75 with Stenzler's text disclosed two verses which
Stenzler does not give, and which are wanting in No. 76. The first
occurs in the second sargn, between Stenzler's verses 6 and 7. It runs
with the commentary on it :
mit frrqnr *&$$

"f* : F% w?r nrfrr ' | ^ - f% fww
7% ^--*< <1^: f%= ^ 1< ^^ |
The second occurs in the fifth sarga, between Stenzler's verses 29
and 30 :
<T qfTT^T J:fmr % * 1?5?<% Il ? Il

-. |.-<?! : 5 4tf f"4 ^ 1*<:^
#^ ^ ^ : i ss'h-T f% TT: *
* ^ ** II *.
It will be convenient to say something here of a very interesting
Jain avachri on the same poem which came under my notice later,
during the current year. The book belongs to Nryana Bhatta of
Jeypore. It consists of 49 leaves, of which leaves 2 to 8, containing
the text only, have been supplied to fill a gap. The reason why the
avachri or gloss was not at the same time supplied, is not far to seek.
At the end of the seventh sarga the writer of the manuscript tells 11s that
he finished copying out that sarga on the tenth day of the first half of
the month Asvin Sam vat year 1573=AD. 1517- The avpchri is
written round the text. The colophon to the first sarga was on one- of
the missing leaves. The colophon to the avachri of the second sarga
bears date the ninth day of the first half of Mgha of the Samvat year
1573. That of the avachri of the third sarga is the fourth day of the
dark half of the month Chaitra of the same year. Five days more suffi
IN THI BOMBAY CIRCLE.
55
ced for the avachri of the next sargn, which was finished on the ninth
day of the same half of the same month. The work would appear then
to have been laid aside, as the avachri of the fifth sarga is dated Friday,
the twelfth day of the first half of the month Chaitra of the Samvat
year 1574. No date is given for the gloss on the sixth sarga. The task
was finished on Friday, the fourteenth day of the dark half of the
month Margrasira Samvat 1574. The writer is Muni Matiratna, who tells
us at the end of each colophon that he has written the book svapathanrtham for his purposes, so to say, as a college student. In one of
the colophons, that of the avachri on sarga 10, he adds that he has
written it with his own hand, an expression which at once stamps him
as the author, as well as the writer, of this gloss. Nryan Bhatt's
book then is the veritable copy which Muniratna, in pursuance of a
custom still common in India, laboriously prepared in the course of pri
vate study.* His first task was to write out a clear and good copy
of the text. In the margin he wrote from time to time such explan
ation as he considered it desirable to record.
Muni Matiratna belonged to the Upakesagachchha. His master's
name was Kshammiru, who had in his turn been the pupil of MatisAgara, He tells us that he wrote in Ahipura (bhujanagara, Bhooj)
during the victorious reign of Mahamad Khan.
Matirntnn's gloss stops with the seventh canto, though his copy of the
text gives the eighth also. The tradition among the pandits on this
matter, as is well known, is that the eighth canto, with the first seven,
is really the work of Klidsa, but should be left unexplained. It is
to be regretted that the last line of the 49th and last leaf of this manu
script leaves us uncertain as to whether it originally went further
than the eighth canto. The leaf is complete ; and the last line is iti
srkumrasambhave mahkvye kavikulatilakakavisriklidsakntau
surata. It seems most likely that only one leaf is wanting.
This copy of the Kumrasambhava contains the second, t but not the
first, of the two verses which I have given above from No. 75 of our
collection. The following table of the remaining variations which it pre
sents from Stenzler's text has been drawn up for me by Mr. Ram
chandra Shastri, and revised by myself.
* And for subsequent use as a book to lecture from (p/ithanam). The two
were generally in the end the same. In one plane I find the carious oxpression
t With the reading jprj: *rjft**i Prff?0.
56
Sarga. I.V. 1 tiHRtft- Vv. 5 and 6 are transposed. V. 8 4TT-
JTfT. V. 14 JT?jrr4 . V. 24 * | %c*ft. V. 26 $ V. 30

^^.
V. 34 farf%T.
.-.
V. 56 . (for ^>:). V. 61 Cr^THWT.
Vv. 42 and 43 are transposed. V.
44
Sarga. It.V. 5 *ft frqrir. V.8^Wf*4h V. 12^5^:. V. 20
^frrfiifr. V. 26smrf*rrc. V. 28 ^TPTT. V. 29<44|. V. 32

^ ftTW. V. 40nj4^Rt. V. 49. p^ y^rrffas. V. 53 ^- I
TT- V. 54 TfTT. V. 56 STTf (for ) I >*. V. 58
>|^. V. 63 >%%^.
Sarga III.V. 2 \ V. 6 irf3f:. V. 8 *:. V. 18 *.
V. 19 % ^. V. 26 . V. 31 -*. V. 37 ^ *:*^^T^f. V. 39 ^^:. V. 41 wpfHfrr V. 44 -. V. 46
I ^TT^ CTSTT- V. 48 . V. 50 ~\- V. 54
^ V. 55 ffffa'Hf'TT. V. 56 grfvr. V. jsq^g: | yrmrT. V. 59 5 I fa4fTT. V. 72 ^ffq- jpfr.
Sarga IV.V. 2 ftiTq-fsfa'T V. 8 rfT^nfa ^. V. 15 TPtf^ l
**"!*&: V. 23 Pni^rrft ^. V. 25 fan-rcft: | *^! V. 27
irNHt ^. V. 28 ; ^. V. 29 ^ | ^V. 31 ^* ft. V. 37 ffa = f*. V. 43 4^rit4T (Com.=tf?R )
*4<*II4M*H. V". 44 ijf'.
Sarga V.V. 10 frrerq^MT^Pi. I ^ <- V. 13 $. V. 14
$ V. 21 prrft- . V. 22 rrvprr. V. 26 <<^1|1:. V. 31

srf*ra. V. 33 ?% 4*Hf. V. 35 . v. 39 *^.
v. 40^*5. v. 61 ^- V. 73 *$* rnpnt- * %^
5 ft ^. V. 74 ^ ^ V. 78 ^1?.
Sarga. VI. V. 5 ^. V. 6 . V"- 7 *1.
V. 9 fr (for ff). V. 12 &. V. 13 $??. V. 15. Wj^: Tf <!?5. V. 19 ^ ^. V. 21 %84<- V. 30
&4 34 mftre V. 35 . V 36 t - V. 38 gHltfft.
V. 40 ifcrRr- V. 43 fêqpurr. V. 43 ^f^T | * *qfrFij.
Vv. 42 and 43 are transposed. V. 44 . V. 45 Hf%^:.
v. 46 ^[ i *|'^<'. v. 47 ?rfrr?Tprai' f&n-..

V. 48 3T^Tfirv: V. 50 rfH^^HI^H. V. 53 I sPtfNT:.
v. 58 ^ 1 Wîfr. v. 61 ^^;. v. 64 ^ I
- V. 67 ftwyifoM4Tft ?. V. 68 ymragft: V. 71 * V. 73
* Tffm^T 4j:. v. 74 ^. v. 75 . V. 7 ^$
^. V. 78:. V. 79** I <* *^; jr. .851***.
V. 88 tft ?^ *%. V. 94 *.
IN THE BOMBAY CIRCLB.
57
Sarga. VII.V. 4fcrrer V. ?!^. V. 7 fterrpt. V. 8

^^. V. 10 ftp* ^rf^PT V. 11 frfTTT^^. V. 15 arre^h^-*!.
V. 17 -^' ^. V. 20 Tft^. V. 21 . V. 22
*rjWT?ffc?r.
V. 28 ^ T I SliUrtlTT^ V. 20 TTpf srft*?r. V. 35 PrT. V. 41 spft , - V. 42 * 5*V. 44 V. 48 ^, V. 55 ftcb^(a*ft I 1\\
V. 57 FcfrPT f^. V. 63 ff<iKtSjftftr- V. 65 ^??*|- v- 67 ^
T &: V. 68 ftn^jr. V. 69 PTTSTSfff V. 70 ?#$.
V. 71 - V. 72 q-qmf^ I *. V. 73 3mr*TW: V. 75
^ (for ^) V. 84 srrnitTratAufrecht refers to two verses, one of which he quotes, as ascribed in
No. 87. The Latakame- the Srngadharapaddhati to a poet sanlakaprahasanam of Sankha- khadhara. Both verses occur in the
a"
present prahasanam.
1 give the verse
vrhich Aufrecht does not quote :
^^-\\ ^^^^^^^^ s r *i n%;*4it*4*<-- tf[**F>3br*f-- 1
The original from which the present copy was made for Government
1 found in the library of Pandit Bhavnand at Alwar.
The Harihrvali is an anthology of the same kind as the Smgadharapaddhati and Yallabhadeva's SubhNo. 92 The Harihar- ghitvali. It contains verses ascribed to
val, an Anthology com
piled by Harikavi.
the poet who in Akbar's time won for
himself, or took to himself, the title of the
Klidsa of that age (Akbaryaklidsa), and to Jaganntha, the
author of the Bhminvilsa.* It is therefore, in all probability, a
more recent compilation than the two already known works of this
class. It has long been recognized, however, that the historical worth
of these anthologies need not be made to depend too closely on
the date of the compiler. In .the present case the tradition which
Hari preserves, while it contains much that in the comparatively
short interval between him and us has already become again obscure,
* The exact date of the HarihArAvali is probably fixed by the fact that he
qnotes his own brother, ChakrapAni. Chakrapni is a writer, whose date, if
I mistake notj Bhler has somewhere determined.
58
appears to me to mount as high for its sources as either Vallabhadeva's

or amgadhara's work. The compiler was a Deccan poet. But he
betrays an acquaintance with the literature of his country in the
widest sense of the term. His quotations in particular from the early
poets of Kashmere are numerous.
As introductory verses (to dramas?), I find the following stanzas by
Buna and Bhsa respectively in praise of Prvat:
fail"! bZf'-' yRdR TCW fTolPl MWNjj
I51*? *4<& * 4*44W'Nh
The shprakirnaka chapter under the same heading begins with

the followiug verse by BAna in praise of Skanda :
** ^ ^% fîrre44jiftran(4
^H 4r4l44l4l4friRlflf& "^ ^ww: '

The chapter on the praise of famous poets contains, as was to be
expected, much of great interest. The verse HTiiT lf*H<i frt) , which
Aufrecht* quotes from the Srngadharapaddhati as ascribed to Rjasekhara, is here given anonymously, and with the variants j3 t^M-",
and S jrff *r%^ 5TT * %. In Pandit Bhavannd's manuscript of
the Srngadharapaddhati the poet Skanda or Skandha's name is
written as Aufrecht has it, and for if or nT^cO- 1 find i.*Ncft.
Aufrecht's ascription of the verse to Riljasekhara is perhaps open to
question. In Pandit Bhavnand's manuscript of the Srngadhara
paddhati we have four verses following each other. The first is the
Bhsa verse in the srdlavikrdita metre.
Then follow three anushtubh verses
3Tft JPTTfT (quoted by Aufrecht),
*HHd4fqMIuli (quoted by Aufrecht),
and
1 *(Wft STf #^<*: II
Z. D. M. G. 26, 77.
59
At the end of the third of these verses we have the subscription

I J Vf *T*KHMb Even if, as is likely enough, rr?ft is a mistake
for <i%,it would seem that in this manuscript at least of theSArngadharapaddhati, RS in the Harihrvali, the verse 4Tf ^*) is to be
understood as given without an author's name.
In the HarihArvali it is followed immediately by Sr-Dhanada's
verse ^1"|*1<*|<|: (Auf. loe. cit., p. 2;, with the variants
fff, and . The subscription is sftvrfr^r, referring to the
latter only of the two verses given here together.
In another chapter of the Harihrvali, the visishtakaviprasansa,
occurs the following passage:
t-TPHlfrHI^l^T <*Mrl<^PtffpT* I
^^ : ^nfaftWWl II
^?'| %<3"1 f^nTTCPJj I
irgWt*PMfc ff Rrs^r II
m i*i*) *^ tifawatfaw i
4 ^^^'^ Il
0 rfTff ^ ^Fiî^Tt:
*: .-- 5RffT ? ^^": Il
fftfvjf- ?mr ^ v^rira: I
1 ^ THT 4% ^Rira: H
^^*W <rf * II
The subscription here is qTTCfrsn^fr.
There follow :
srtfr 11% ^ TfRff^TTf^r^ I

^ tt^ gr^nr^ri. 1 1
"1<^ % ^ f*TT: I
?%5? 4Wr # HT: HF3- "
with the subscription HN<i|.
It seems likely that in the former case xpft is a mistake for ifr, and
that we may treat the whole passage as a further extract from the same
worka Bhojaprabhandha, according to Hari, by Rjasekhara, the
* ms. %|<*.
60
OPE BATIONS IN SEARCH OP SANSKRIT MSS.
author of the three dramas, and the preceptor of king Mahendrapla

as has already yielded the arf jpTrT verse. Rjasekhara is, as we have
seen, referred to in Somadeva's Yasastilaka, a book which was
written in A. D. 959. The beginning of Bhoja's reign is put at
A. D. 966. Rjasekhara therefore and his patron Mahendrapla were
contemporaries both of Somadeva and of King Bhoja.* Aufrecht has
pointed out that Rjasekhara was the great-grandson of the poet
Aklajalada, and that he included among his ancestors the poets
Surnanda, Trala, and Kavirja.
In any case, the verses here cited from the Harihrvali have their
own importance.
Anandavardhana (ninth century) is the Kashmere poet : and the
work referred to is his book on Dhvani. To Vijajnk, of the
Krnta country, the high praise is given that as a model of the
Vaidarbha style she stands next Klidsa himself, f It may be that
by her nom de plume Vijaynk signifies that she used the word vijaya
as a mark or sign, placing it in the final verse of each division of her
work. X In that case the real name has still to be discovered, if she
is not the same as the Vijjak of the rngadharapaddhati. Next we
have a new poetess, Prabhudev, of the Lt country, The verse that
follows adds a little to our knowledge of two of the poets mentioned in
the Bhsa verse, Rmila and Somila, and explains the compound in
the dual into which their names are cast there, Rmila and Somila
were the Beaumont and Fletcher of their time ; and in their joint
composition, which has still to be found, they told the story of
draka. As yet all that is known of theirs is the single vers in
the Srngadharnpaddhati, which Aufrecht justly cites as one of the
finest gems of that collection
ffr ^&<.**1^
" Rjasekhara, the preceptor of Mahendrapla, who flourished about the
tenth century."Bhandarkar's Report for 1882-3, p. 44.
t So Bn a and the woman SlbhattrikA are grouped together as examples
of the Pnchala style in an anonymous verse of the Sirugatlharap.
Aufrecht, p. 93.
J Compare Mfinflnka, a name which should not be altered, as Bhtlingk
suggests, into M;'lnka.
TN THE BOMEAY CIRCLE.
61
It will be noticed that this verse is in the form of question and

answer, which may perhaps yield a clue as to the pnrticularform of joint
composition which Rmila and Somila employed. The Ratnkara of
the next verse is the author of the Haravijayakvya (Bhler's Report,
p. 43). The meaning of the next verse is not clear to me. Ratnkara
is fit to be compared to the other four ratnkaras (oceans). But from
Mayra there sprung (as his pupil) the poet Kulichuri, a single birth
which more than rivalled the countless moons that night after night
rise out of the ocean. The remaining poets of this enumeration are
hardly more than names to us. Aufrecht* quotes one verse of Dhanamjaya's from rdharadsa's SaduktikarnAmrita.f Trala, one of
Rjasekhara's forefathers, is mentioned in the Bhsa verse. Of Ganapati' nothing, and of Pradyumna, a writer of plays, very little appears
to be known. I find Pradyumnavijaya and Pradyumnnandya cited
as the names of two plays in Bhtlingk's Dictionary.
In the same chapter of the Hariharftvali there is a highly important
reference to Pnini. Aufrecht (Z. D. M. G. 36, 365) has shown, from
an allusion in an anonymous verse found in Srdharadsa's Saduktikarnmrita to the poet Pnini as the son of Dksh, that Indian tra
dition knew of only one Pnini, poet and grammarian. I had not
seen Aufrecht's paper referred to when writing my previous Report, but
I have taken there the same view, and have urged that the tradition in
question must be held to go back as far as Kshemendra. In the pre
sent verse, which is quoted from srt-RAjasekhara, we have an explicit
statement in the matter, and also the name of one of Pacini's poems,
which we may assume to have been in existence in Rjasekhara's
time, and which is probably in existence still :
^ l*<u hl*i(4;i *1**1<*. Il

" Hail to Pnini, who by Rndra's grace, wrote first his grammar, and
thereafter his poem Jmbuvatjaya."
The verse that follows this refers to Bina, and, if I have construed
it correctly, shows that the relation in which that writer stood to the
Z D. D. M. G. 36, 533.
t Since this was written I have obtained a Dvihsatpdhnakvyam, by Dhanamjaya, eon of sr-Dev and Vastideva, which may I hope prove to be by the
famous poet of that name. It is a Ragnavapndavya, of the same kind, bu
not the same, as that already known.
62
Gumidhya whom he praises in the beginning of his Harshacharita was

matter of common knowledge. The verse is ascribed to Trivikrama and
is found in his Nalachamp
"The modest (bent) Gundhya, when seconded by Bna (an arrow)

reaches all hearts like a bow (bent, and with an arrow on the string)."
The verse that follows this has already been given by Aufrecht
(Z. D. M. G. 2G, 42), from the SArngadharapaddhati, where, as here,
it is attributed to Krishnabhatta. I reproduce the verse because I
venture, with diffidence, to think, that Aufrecht's translation, which has
been objected to as almost unintelligible, is much more correct, than
that which Bhtlingk (Z. D. M. G. 20,029,) would substitute for it :
# <* ' *
I would translate:
" Poets there were of old days, K:\lidasa and the like; but we too,
who live now, may claim the name ; an atom and a hill may be of the
same stuff."*
Next comes an anonymous verse, in which Klidsa's pre-eminence is
brought out by a fanciful derivation for the name, anmika the
Nameless, given to the fourth or ring finger :
3T3TTTT '*1*"^<4*1|/^' Tpfart 4^ M

"Of old in counting up their poets men gave the little finger [the
first used in counting by opening up, finger by finger, the clenched
hand] to Klidsa ; and to this day the next finger has remaiued with
out a name, because no poet like unto Klidsa has arisen."
The verse immediately following is only of importance, I fancy, as
illustrating a tradition according to which Bhavabhti was either the
predecessor, or contemporary, of the great poet, and not, as appears
to be perfectly well established, his successor. It is attributed to
Klidsa :
Aufrecht translates the second line, " Das Grundwesen von Dingen ist
sowohl in einem Berge als in einem Atom vorhanden," for which Bhtlingk
suggests, " Sowohl einem Borge als einem Atom kommt der Name Ding lu."
63
4>=# fnrfr ? 4441ft II

Dhanapala's verse, quoted by Aufrecht (loe cit., p. 41 ; compare also
BiJhtlingk, ib., p. 032), is given in the following form :
failrr<*H*r T T?^ 41*4* I

&( ^ *- * II
In another part of the book the verse JT'JM^MI^l is given as
Aufrecht has it (loc. cit., p. 159).* Here there is the following
variant with no author's name :
^^ ^ m i
Hi^f f.<:454 *FTT5<Aa.f II
The SatkaviprasaiWi ends with a verse in which true glory is said
to belong to four poets only, of whom two at least are to us mere names.
Aufrecht has this verse, but with 4t for q^, a reading which I think
obscures the sense :
4fpH4rt: ^rfVi^rt: * faifa 4-<*V *11%41< I
To go back to Rljasekhara, the following passage is, in the chapter

satkavyaprasansa, put over the subscription 'lKMi'NiHtjf- It follows
immediately a passage of similar import which closes with Buna's verse
. it is possible that Rjasekhara incorporated that verse
in his own catalogue of Poets, but I give only the verses with regard to
which there is a reasonable presumption of his authorship :
$: *R*r?t gTsr rtHHff>ir: .
=)4iH4wit t^re^fr Wfr^rar jpw- 1

^Rl fTTRTV f$ PpgrTr: Il
^^': m ^" i
Pm ^ irerT *sr start
* Except that the HrSvali has [jrjfr; for TTTjfr;. I may note, with reference
to the doubt Bhtlingk expresses as to whether Aufrecht is right in seeing a
reference to Bna in the word fiqfgptfrT'W 'ât *^ Pre8ent MS. takes care to
write frafror.
64
OPERATIONS IN SEARCH SANSKRIT MSS.
In these and the following chapters the introductory verses to Bans'

Harshacharitra are largely drawn on. It is a remarkable fact that
Hari, in one place, preserves a verse of that passage which stands in
none of the MSS. I have seen, and is not found either in the Calcutta
or in the Kashmir editions. In it Buna mentions the poet Mentha.
This gives us a lower date for a poet whose date has hitherto been
more uncertain. The passage is as follows :
^ ip^r^r Jifa 3f^Tr II
In the beginning of his commentary on Mahesvarakavi's Sabdabbedapraksa Jnnavimala first makes the usual
No. 99. Mahevara's pious invocation to Sntinth and the Godtt^n^^ntar;^ dess of Learning. Next he pays honour due
Jnnavimala.
to the great teachers Abhayadevasri, Jinadattasrirja, and Jinakusalasri. After
this he cites some of the authorities to whom he has had regard in
preparing for the task he had undertaken. Thse are the Visvapraksa,
the sastras of Bhguri, Vijnyanta, Vydi, and Ssvata, and the
excellent Pathypathyanighantu. These he gives as the most import
ant, having no desire to overload his own book with a writer's inven
tory ( tfa<4)|<4r: ) of all the works he has studied.
In passing to the first verse of his author, '^^
Jnnavimala is disconcerted to find that Mahesvara, at a first glance,
would appear to have been guilty of the presumption of beginning his
book without an invocation to one or other saint or god. He finds
however what he seeks in the single syllable Sf. Pra and atha were the
first words that "opened the throat" of Brahma: and he who would
observe the rule with the least inconvenience has but to see that his work
begins with one or other of these syllables. We are reminded of the
benedictus benedicat that, from a similar striving after as much
brevity as may be consistent with a religious duty, does service for grace at
some colleges. Jnnavimala quotes a text for his doctrine :
He goes on, and this is more interesting, to point out that Mahesvara
follows some notable examples. Thus Ktyyana at the beginning of
his work substitutes, for the sake of securing an auspicious word, siddhe
abdrthasarnbandhe, for nitye sabdrthasarnbandhe, as he would
fj5
otherwise have written. So PAnini writes vriddhir d aich, not d aich

vriddhih, in order that the first word in his book may be 'increase.'
Kumiira, in the beginning of his KAlApaka grammar, writes siddho
varnasamAmnAyah, not variiasammnayah siddhah, as the ordinary rules
of style would have suggested. Imira, in the beginning of the Indra
grammar writes, not rdher annktnm siddhih, but siddhir annktnm
rdheh. Hemachandra, siddhih syAdvAdAt, not sydvdat siddhih.
Vopadeva, sain sabdah, not sabdah sara. Skatyana, in the gram
mar called by his own name, begins his invocation with sr. AnubhtisvaipAchArya begins his with pra. While our author Mahesvara,
has been said, makes the same small syllable do the whole work of the
invocation, besides serving its primary function as the first syllable of
the word prabodham.
To light upon a passage which not merely gives the real name of the
author ot the Ktantra (kAlpaka: also kaumra?) grammar,* but ac
tually quotes the first words of Indra's grammar, while as yet scholars
are disputing as to whether such a work ever existed, is indeed a
reward for much fruitless toil.
In the end of his work Jivmavimala gives his own spiritual lineage.
He begins with the rise of the Kharatara sect, which he places in the
year 1080 after Vikrama = .V.U. 10'24, when Jinesvara overthrew the
ChaityavAsins in the assembly convened by king Durlabha. To the same
gana belonged A bhayadevasuri, the author of commentaries on the
nine angas beginning with the Sthnnga, and the saint whose prayers
brought forth the famed Cambay image of the Trthankar PArsvanAth.
He was succeeded by JinavallabhAchArya, the author of a work on Karma
and many other books. He was succeeded by Jinadattasuri. From
Jinadattasuri the list goes after a break to JinamAnikyasri, whose
successor was Jinachandrasuri of the Rihada race, who obtained
from Akbar the title of Yugapradhna. Devendrasri and Jinasinhasri were contemporaries of Jinachandrasiri, and Jnnavimala, the
author of this book, one of his many pupils. He composed his
book with the assistance of his pupil Vallabha; and two other pupils,
JnAnasundara and Jayavallabha, wrote down the first copy. This
took place in the city of Vikrama (Bekaneer), when RAjasinha was king
there, in the Samvatyear 1694 =A. D.. 1038. Jnnavimala concludes
"with a prayer that his work may be useful to students by the
* Colebrooke says of the Ktantra, grammar that " tho rules and aphorisms
we ascribed to the God Kumar." Essays ii. 611. Quoted by Uurnell.
i
66
OPERATIONS IN SEAICH OF SAKSKK1T MS?.
mercy of PArsvanth and Jinakusalasri.

his own teacher.
The latter may have bwn
Two of the books that follow belong to that still obscure cycle of
works grouped by the Hindoos under the
No. 101. The K.-iiidarpa.-.,
/.-<
1
n '* *
chdmani of Vrabhadra.
tltle of Kamaeastra. If this sastra were a
modern invention, scholars might be content
to leave it in the obscurity the subject courts. 15ut, as is well known,
that is by no means the case. The stras of Vtsyynna are quoted by
Varhaniihira and Bhavabhiiti ; and the literary interest attaching to
such names as Slavhana would alone call lor a careful enquiry into
the subject. I conjecture that such an enquiry, if it could be made
complete by a comparison of the Hindoo books with those kept under
lock and key in European libraries, would show that for one branch
of their literature at leastând that one which they may abandon
all claim to without much regretthe Hindoos were largely indebted to
Greek influence. But that is put forward merely as a conjecture, the
ground for it being chiefly the fact that there appears to be nothing in
the previous native literature to prepare for the sudden appearance of
this class of books at or shortly before the time when, as we know from
the case of astronomy, Greek influence was exerted over the Indian
mind. That the Ionian Cr reeks had suoh a science to communicate we
know, if only from Hornee; and the conjecture that they did com
municate it may perhaps be forgiven.
No. 101 in the present collection is a copy of a metrical commentary
on the stras of Vtsyiyana by a royal author, who fortunately gives
us his date and his lineage. He belonged to the Vaghela dynasty, and
wrote " in the year 1633." His name was Vlrahhadrn. Hewathe
eon of Rmachandra, who was the son of Vrabhnu, who was the son
of Vlrasinha, who was the son of rilavhaua, the founder of their
house. In the library belonging to His Highness the Mnharana of
Uodeypore there is a book composed " in the year 1634," in which one
bhattcbrya-er- Padmanbha sings of the deeds of Vrabhadra, sob of
Rmachandra and Yasod.* The Mabarana's copy was written Samvat
1648, from which it follows that the date given within the work itself
as the date of its composition is to be referred to the Samvat and not
the Saka era. But if Padmanbha's eulogy of Vrabhadra was written
* The beginning and end of Padmanibha's Trachampu will bo foand in
my First Beport, p. 101.
THE BOMBAY CIRCLE.
67
a S am vat 1634, Vrabhadra must also betaken to be, in his work,

using the Samvat era. This gives us a line of Vaghela kings stretch
ing back from Vrabhadra who wrote in A.D. 1577 to Slarhana, from
whom Vrabhadra was the fourth in direct descent.
In the preface to his Vsavadatt, Hall says that Vrabhadra is, like
Mallanga, another name for Vtsyyana. Hall does not give his
authority- for this statement ; and it may be perhaps conjectured that the
Vrabhadra he had in view is the author of our Kandarpachdmani.
No. 108 is a fragment of a commentary on Vtsyyana by an author
v
who rives his name ns Yasodhnra, and intijSo. ins

1<4J. Commentary
un Vatsyflyana, caliod iuya- mates that he wrote this explanation of the
mngala,
stras which Vtsyyana collected, after
he had retired from the world in grief at the loss of a beloved wife, and
had, under the name of Indrapda, entered the ascetic life, yfrf 44'<HNlfl ^?^^^:<0 ^' ***^;
This coty of the Jainendravykaranam contains the text of the whole
The Jainendravykara- work down to tl,c words ^T& **&*** in
cam with an anonymous which it is intimated, whether by the author
himself, or by an early commentator, that
the last four stras are given on the authority of another writer,
Samantabhadra. The gloss is written round the margin, and dates only
from Samvat 1704= A D. lt'43.
In his paper on the Jainendravykaranam, contributed to the Indian
Antiquary.t Dr. Kielhorn has given an account of the contents of this
book, and has started a new theory with regard to its authorship.
According to that scholar we are to understand by the Piijyapftda, to
whom the book is generally ascribed, " no ordinary grammarian but
thePjyapda f'ox*>v, Mahvra, the Inst of the Jains." The ordinary
human author of the hook", who under this view, is in danger of becom
ing an unknown quantity, Dr. Kielhorn conjectures to have been
" Devanandi, a grammarian who is mentioned in the Ganaratnamaho* This book has been accidentally omitted from the list of manuscripts pur
chased during the year under report. It will be placed and numbered iu tho
list for 1881-5.
t Vol. X., p. 75. From a reference in this paper I learn that Dr. Zacharie
bad already given an account of the Jainendra grammar and ta commentary.
This I am sorry I have not been able to consult.
G8
dadhi and elsewhere." For the proofs advanced in support of this

second proposition, it will be more convenient to refer to Dr. Kielhom's
own summary.*
In a critique on Dr. Kielhom's paperf, Mr. . B. Pathak had little
difficulty iu showing that the l'jyapda, so unceremoniously dismissed
from the world of living beings by Dr. Kielhorn, occupies a much more
secure place in the literature of his country and his religion than his
assailant was probably aware of. What I have called the second
part of Dr. Kielhom's theory Mr. Pathak accepts. With Dr. Kielhorn,
he takes anekasesham vykarauam the meaning of which expression
is well explained by Dr. Kielhorn in his paper to be name, with
jainendra, denoting the present work, and that only. On this view the
references in the commentators establish the fact that Devanaudi was
* " My proofs are these :
1. For tlie rule of the Jainendram (= P. IV., 3, 115) the commen
tator Abhayanandin givos the illustration ^'^^' '41* Vit ' the Auekasesha grammar composed by Devanandin.'
2. On the rule rTfJ^r (= P. II., 4, 21) both Abhayanandin and
Somadeva quote the instance "^^-^^^^ . the Anekasesha gram
mar first propounded by Deva (i.e. Devanandin).'
3. On a rule which corresponds to P. I., 1, (19 and 70, and which|in the short
er recension is worded ' ^^'^-:' and in the longer recen
sion 'C<PTr4I44?cTS'3?'T/ the commentator Somadeva quotes the following
verso :
?5: ^ iTril ft" $\ I
HT^T q-3%fr --' ^^H:
'By the word ' in this rule Devanandin denotes the following five, viz., a
substitute, an affix, that which has , tnat which has ., and that which has
for its Anubandha.' (See MahAbhshya, vol. I., pago 177.)
4. The MS. of the Panchavastuka ends with the remark that ' this is the work
of the Achilrya Devanandin.' But as the explanatory part of the Panchavastuka
is in the body of the MS. stated to belong to Srutaktrti, I tako the truth of that
remark to be that Devanandin was the anotherof the rules rearranged and com
mented on in the Panchavastuka.
5. Finally, I believe that the author of tho Jainendram himself has suggest
ed to us his name in the very first lines of his work, which have been quoted
already, and which run thus :
^^^ *T (^- I
+ Indian Antiquary, Vol. XII., p. 19.
69
a name of the author of the Jainendravykaranam : and that Pujyapda was so called Mr. Pathak finds expressly asserted in the following
verse, which he quotes from a ptittvali :
^^- "Rit' :
Taking up the discussion where Mr. Pathak left it, I desire first to
notice that our book belongs to a class of works for which both sects
of the Jains contend, but which is undoubtedly peculiar to the Uigambaras. The rival sect as good as admits this when they assert, as they
invariably do, that theirrecension of the Jainendravykaranam isin eight,
not five, adhyyas. There appears to be no such work in existence
as a Jainendravykaranam in eight adhyyas : and, when they are hard
pressed, the Svetiimbaras can only put forward Hemachandra's book,
and claim for it that title. This being so, it is evident that the question
of the authorship of the book cannot be disposed of without a reference
to the tradition among the Digambara Jains, and to their written
records.
Pandit Phatell of Jeypore, by whose assistance I obtained the pre
sent copy, ascribed unhesitatingly the composition of the work to a
Digambara Jain teacher called Pjyap.ida, whom lie distinguished from
another Digambara Jain authority on grammar, by name Devanandi.
The testimony of Somadeva (A. D. 120.\), the author of the
Sabdrnavachandrik, a commentary on the Jainendravykaranam, so
far from being halting and ambiguous, is, when properly considered,
as clear and unambiguous as could be wished. I transcribe Somadeva's first verse from Dr. Kielhorn's paper*:
'4,5*r4T?44rt UH^?T^
flrTPK5Tfrririf>r<T4'rf5; I
*)Tta<H*Hul*W * fr*4. ^
Hereby the artifice of a double reference, so dear to Hindoo writers,
Somadeva, at the outset of his commentary, conjoins the reverence
he pays to the great Trthankarworshipped by all the gods with
Chandra, the Jain Indra, at their headwith the respect due to that
excellent Jain (Jinendra) Pjyapda Gunanandi Deva, whom Somadeva
I may mention here that I am not able to consult the Ueccan College MSS.
Dr. Kielhorn deeoribee, which have all gone to Germany to be catalogued.
70
IN SEARCH OP SANSKRIT MSS.
(soma) acknowledged as his master. To explain Pjyapda out of

existence, in the face of this verse, is, I submit, almost as unreasonable
as it would be to infer from Mr. Froude's volumes on Carlyle that
Froude indeed existed, but that he had unfortunately confounded
Carlyle with Odin.
It is more difficult to determine whether it is necessary to accept
the theory that the Devanandi, who wrote an anekasesha or jainendra
grammar, and who is constantly quoted as an authority by Jain scho
lars, is the samo as Pjyapda. If the reader will turn back to Dr.
Kielhorn's five proofs, he will see, I think, that the first three do not
necessarily establish more than that both Abhayauandi and Somadeva knew of an anekasesha grammar composed hy Devanandi.*
The bearing of the book known as the Panchavastuka (proof No. 4)
on the controversy I will examine immediately. Apart from the
others, proof Xo. 5 has little force- We may readily admit in the
verse relied ou a reference to the name Devanandi, and discover in the
rest of the word a reference to the name Pjyapda. But the meaning
of the reference is another matter. If the verse is, as Dr. Kielhoru
takes for granted, and as the writer of the introduction to the Pancha
vastuka expressly asserts, by the author himself, it would he quite
as easy to see in it, as in Somadeva's case, a punning reference to
a teacher's name. Lastly, Mr. Pathak's verso, while it may have
the meaning assigned to it, more obviously conveys the statement that
Pjyapda was the other name of Gunandi, which, as we have seen, is
Somadeva's view of the matter.
* In proofs there is nothing in tho quotation itself to justify Dr. Kielhorn'a

translation" By the word ttfizf in tAis rule Devanandi," &c.
1 Piithak, with whom I have been in communication on this matter,
thinks there can be no doubt the Jain grammatical authorities Pjyapda
and Devanandi are one and the same, as also that there never has been any
break in the tradition to that effect. He has obligingly sent mo three extracts
in support of that view, which I am able to place hero in a note. The first
two are from a work called Kkntakhandnna by one Lakshmdhara, who de
scribes himself as the pupil of Samantabhadra.
tTTtfrftftcaiTTT;:4ift;Tr: "TWf 7T[%rj ffN ^ jt I -
ITf THE BOMBAY CIRCLE.
71
The Decern! College copy of the Panchavastuka, a work in which,

according to Dr. Kielhom, the stras of the Jainendra vykaranam are
rearranged and explained, ends with the remark that " this is the
work of the Achrya Devanandi." frfrTn^? <^H4)Mt4^T <1,
But in the body of the manuscript Kielhom finds a Terse in which
"the authorship of the Pancha va* tuka is distinctly assigned to Srutakrti " (loe cit. p. 76), or, as he puts it in proof No. 4, "the expla
natory part of the Panchavastuka is stated to belong to Srutnkrti."
In these circumstances Kielhom takes this colophon to mean that
Devanandi " was the author of the rules rearranged and commented on
in the Panchavastuka," that is, was the author of the Jainendra
grammar.
Through the kindness of Rao Bahadur Mahndev Wasudcv Barve,
CLE , late Minister at Kohlapore, I have obtained a copy of the
Panchavastuka. It was sent to me, and this is noteworthy, in response
to a request to be favored with the loan of a copy of the Jainendravy-
*PTrPT?T 01\{ Il
^?<^>^>^?^: { arfare
*& 'fzntf ^: ; fteitf ($ I
Mr. Pathak gives the text ae it appears in tbe manuscript without alter
ations or corrections.
The third is from tho Jain Hirivansa, a work written, as Mr. Pathak informs
mo, in Saka 705=.. D. 783, ' when Indrfiyudha, the son of Krishnadev I.
was rnling."
I mrtst leave these quotations without further comment than that tho mean
ing of the last appears to me to bo doubtful. Mr. Pathak would refer the first
lino to Devanandi, " tho author of the great (rundra !) and extensive (vyipi)
Jainendra grammar, which will last as long as the sun and moon (chandrrka)
endure. Hut is there not here rather an enumeration of the grammars
tho Rudra (Pnini's), Chandra, Arta ?, Jainendra, and Vyadiwhich Devanandi
was able to use for his own book.
I am glad to be ablo to say that Mr. Pathak, whoso qualifications are of a
very special kind, has undertaken to edit one of those Digambara Jain books
the Shatprbhritatk/ for our Sanskrit Series, in his Introduction to which
he will, I doubt not, clear up much that is now obscure.
72
karanam. Aud the account given of it by the Sr Svmi, who has

kindly put it at my disposal, is that it is a book the stras in which
are by Pjyapda, while the author of the commentary is Devanandi.
Like the Deccan College copv, the present book ends with the colophon
in which the work, as a whole, seems to be ascribed to the Achrya
Devanandi. But it also begins with a rubric in which it is called
Jainendravynkaranam. Stf -. lftiT%^T4T4 I ifl<ftrKMIH ; |
In these circumstances the statement that in the body of the book
itself the authorship of the Panchavastuka, or of the explanatory part
of it, is distinctly assigned to one Srutakrti, becomes exceedingly im
portant. But 1 believe that Dr. Kielhorn is mistaken here, and that
it cau be shown that the single reference to the Arva or Achrya
Srutakrti occurring in the introduction to the Panchavastuka is not of
a nature to lead us to the conclusion that we are to find in him the
author of the book.
Kielhorn has seen that what may be called the actual text of the
Panchavastuka begins with the verse, T^rff ^15) which stands in
his Fol. 11 as it stands in my Foil. 10 and 11. The reference to Srutakrti
is in 8 of his manuscript, and in 7b of mine. That is, il stands in the socalled Pratyhrnupravesa, which, to my mind, wears every appearance
of being a very modern and a very worthless addition to the book.
The writer of this introduction, after a wearisome discussion en benedic
tory verses in general, and a commentary on his own introductory
verse, which he confesses he has borrowed, deliberately gives the go
by to the fact well known to himthat the author of the Panchavas
tuka accepted the pratyhras as they stood in the works of other
grammarians. He quotes from the Panchavastuka itself, and from
other sources, stras to explain the formation of pratyhras. Lastlv,
he actually gives in full the first verse of the book itself, q^'ff
^' alld i" offering his own explanation of a verse, which is,
of course, also commented on in its proper place, he expressly soys
that the subject to ^-^ ' I propose in this book to discuss/ is
f%*4|cH<^K: ' the author.'
For these reasons I think that the introduction is no genuine part
of the book; and I have thought it right not to withhold that con
clusion, though the question as to the meaning of the reference made
to Srutakrti does not, of course, stand or fall with it. To the verse,
*\ TfrrfTiWj borrowed as we have seen from the Panchavastuka, the
IN 1 BOMBAY CIRCLE.
13
writer of the introduction adds a Terse which is of the nature of a

chapter of contents :
'Sandhi,' here, has to be explnined ; and the note is as follows :
^^^^ *rf: - CHprqi-frt 7 <1'
Now if we turn to the Panchavastuka itself, we find (fol. lia) the

following explanation of the word sandhi :
HMHT, (i.e., in the subject proposed in the verse 4*4 *fr ifrTTPTW)
It is quite obvious that the writer of the first of these passages had
the second, that is, had the Panchavastuka, and more especially the
explanatory part of it, before him. The fact that he goes out of his
way to explain a term, ^, which does not occur in his own
verse, but which stands in the passage from the Panchavastuka, is
sufficient to prove this. That being so, the fact that, after virtually
reproducing his author's own explanation of sandhi, ( f^JrTRT
4<h4'"I TFT tffa: *? fi% ^T *rf; ) he adds at the end of his
note a reference to the 'threefold treatment,' which the teacher Srutakrti gave the theme appears to me to be no proof that he regarded
Srutakrti as the author of the book, or that that author is here so
describing himself.
But if Srutakrti* disappears from view as having had anything to
do with the authorship of the Panchavastuka, the colophon to that
work recovers its apparent meaning. What weight we are to give to
the colophon is another matter. If the ascription of the name Jai* I do not know whether wo can boo in Srutakrti's other n amo, Traividya, a
reference to the ' threefold treatment' here spoken of. Srutakrti's date is
given by Mr. Pathak as Saka 1015.
J
74
nendravykaranam to this book be a mere vulgar error, its colophon

would lose half its force, as not necessarily meaning more than that
the scribe knew that Devanandi was one of the names of the author of
that book.
I confess I lean to the belief that the Panchavastukaa compen
dium of the science of grammar as accepted by the Dignmbara Jains
was the work of the Aclmrya Devanandi, and that for all practical
purposes it supplanted the original book. But that must remain
matter for future consideration.
Having thus done something as I trust to put Pjyapda on his feet
again, I should be glad if I could speak with any certainty as to his
date. But the only definite statement I have come across on that
matter is not in accordance with previous conclusions. Mr. Fleet has
told us (Indian Antiquary, Vol. VII , p. 112), that in an unpublished
inscription of the Elliot .MS. collection, from the Sankhabasti temple
at Lakshmcsvar, a gift to one who is described as the house pupil of
Sri Pjyapda is recorded as having been made in Saka 652. Mr.
Pathak accepts this statement as referring to our Pjyapdaand
there is no reason to believe that there were two : and he informs
me that he can corroborate it by facts going to show that Samantabhadra, who would appear to be quoted by Pjyapda, lived at about
the same time. In a Digambara Darsanasra, lately obtained from
Anhilwd Pthan, Devasena, who gives his own date as 909, (appa
rently, from his constant use of that era, Samvat 909 = A.D. 853),
tells us that Vajranandi, the pupil of Sri Pjyapda, founded the
Dravida Samgha in Mathura of the Deccan in the vear 525 ' after the
death of Vikrama.' I give the two passages :
(1) Rif4HI4*fl<HTfrraa*i4Hl *<'*?1

'-^ artH fr*4<MHi i
4ft*ul<<j<lll4 TTf^Thfr *W4?I II 3 Il
(2) *r ""1*110 WT UMW TTT I
1?| % Tr^jsWftT il 4 Il
I have obtained during
No. 264. Vasunandi'e
charavritti. The AchJaimi!
the year under report two copies, Nos. 264

and 273, of the work which for the Digambara Jains of the present day takes the
place of the Ayrnga Sutta of the vetm
75
baras. Its real character will be best disclosed by the following

extract from the beginning of the book :
5ftrrtmT*n
^^^ ?'50^' f%fSr<i*K<*"l5
.^^:, "r^r^riT.ffergf^, -?^, ^^. ^^,
fT^raffîr ?^ far^fwrft \
The book professes then to be a commentary by Vasunandi on a
work, imbedded in it, in which a teacher, here called Sr Vattakerchrya, composed for his pupilsa degenerate race a compendium of
the chrnga as that had been originally put together by the holy
disciples who heard the word from Mahvira's own mouth. This de
scription of the chrnga which i Vatfcakerchrya himself knew
but which his pupils were no longer able to bear in its entirety,
means, I take it, that it is claimed for the text of our book, that it is
the first edition of the book which was reduced to writing. On it
Vasunandi has written the present commentary.
The colophons in the present manuscript of the twelve parichchedas
into which the book is divided are as follows : For the first (fol. 1 to
26) itychravrittau vasunandivirachityii prathamaparichchhedah.
For the second (fol. 26 to 48), the third (fol. 48 to 52), the fourth
(fol. 52 to 78), the same formula with the number changed. Next (fol.
79 to 147) a chapter which ends with the words evam panchchro
vykhytah iti vasunandivirachitym charavrittau panchchravivaranam nma panchamah prastvah. There follow the words, pindasuddhvkhya'n shashtam crnram vidhtukinas tivan namaskiam
76
ha. And the colophon of the sixth chapter (fol. 147 to 171), is
itychravrittau vasunandivirachityrn pindasuddhir ama shashtah
prastvah. The seventh parichchheda (fol. 171 to 217), the eighth
(fol. 217 to 234), the ninth (fol. 234 to 263), and the tenth (fol. 2G3 to
2J2) have the simple iti vasunandivirachityrn, &c. The colophon
of the eleventh chapter (fol. 292 to 3(1.5) is itychravrittau vasuuandivisiddhntikavirachityrn silagunavyvarnanara nmaikadasah parichchhedah. That of the last chapter (fol. 3l)5 to 410), and of the
book is itychravrittau vasunandivirachityrn dvdasah parichchhedah
snmptnh.
The other manuscript, No, 273, exhibits the same variations in
this matter. The third parichchheda is in it much shorter, folios 42 to
4C of a somewhat larger page. Vasunandi's title, found here also in
the colophon to the eleventh chapter, is written saiddhntika.
The colophon to the last chapter is iti mlchravivrittau dvdasodhyayah. After which comes the following description of the whole
book : kundakundcharyaprantamlcharkhyavivrittih pariprn
kritir yarn vasunandinah srsrmanasya. Vatfcakercbrya, is here
identified with the better known Kundakundchrya (For the phrase
mulcharkhya, * the book called Mlchara,' compare the word tattvrthbhidham below, p. 79.) This manuscript has at the end a prasasti
of great interest, to which I can only refer here, but which will be found
in the extracts- In it Miha, or, in the Sanskrit tongue Medhvi, tells
how the copy, of which our book is a transcript, was in Samvat 1516=
A.D. 1470, written for the purpose of being presented to the teacher
.Tinachandrasri. Valtakercharya's name is in the prasasti written
Vatterakachrya.
No. 266 is a Digambara Jain Handbook of the Conduct of Life or Way
of Salvation, by Chmundamahrja. In the
Ko. 2fifl. The Ohitritra- ., . *i , * .*i a xt t j
*i
imof ChUmandamalLirija. Shatprabbritatika, Nemichandra, the author
of the Trailokyasra (Nos. 277 and 2G9 of
this Report) is referred to as the guru or spiritual teacher of Rchchhamalladeva and Chmundarya. The quotation in the Shatprbhritatka is from the second gth of the Trailokyasra. The first gth
of the Trailokyasra runs as follows :
5T7^^r%?T4Tbrft<.ul*on*"l-4<.,'lul?i*<.0f I
f^4î)<."fr?f ffT3THf ^ Il . Il
After giving his own interpretation of this gth, according to which
ri Nemichandrabhattraka (sakalasaiddhantikachakraehdmani) is
here paying honour due to his patron saint Ncminth, the commenta
tor of the Trailokyasra mentions another view.
it
%ffW J*> H 4i *\-
* * RTTPTcJTVrft ^ lr^tfff5Fr^ * fTNTff f% frfpj PT-
" Some say that Rchchhamalladeva wrote this introductory verse

in pious allegiance to his master, and that it consequently contains a
reference also to that master Nemichandra .... of whom it is
accordingly here said that Bala Govinda, the mighty Govinda, that is
Rchchhamalladeva, whose hiruda was Govinda Pramdi, bent his
crown low before him."
Mr. . B. Pathak informs me that the Digambara Jain writer
ChmunJarja gives his own date as Saka 900= A.D. 978.
The discovery among the Digambara Jains of a poem, of consider
able intrinsic merit, by a Mahkavi HariNo. 270. The Dharma- chandra or Harischandra, led me at first to
sarmfibhurlayakuvyam of ,
.
T . ,
,
.
Harichandra.
"Pe tnat I might prove to have filled up a
very noteworthy blank in Sanskrit litera
ture. Bna mentions among other famous books of his own, or pre
vious times, a composition in prose by bhattra Harichandra. Bna's
use of the words bhattra and bhatfcraka in his Harshacharita shows, I
think, that under that title he generally referred to an adherent of the
Jain religion. But I have as yet discovered nothing in the present
poem to enable me to identify it as by the Harichandra to whom
Bna refers. The book deals in twenty-one sargas with the history of
Dharmanth, the fifteenth Trthankar, from his birth to his attainment
of nirvana. In some of the colophons the name of Ilarichandra's father
is given as Ardradeva. The present copy of the work gives no further
information with regard to the author of his family. In a second
copy, acquired during the current year, there occur some verses
which may be by the author himself, and which I give here. Harichan
dra is there described as the son of Ardradeva, a kyastha of the Sanomaka family. His mother's name is given as RAdh, and that of his
younger brother as Lakshmana. From one of the verses it would
appear as if the title Sarasvatiputra, which I have met with in Jain
books, refers to this Harichandra :
'
OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OF SANSKRIT M3S.
*4<: 4 HINtrtH,; II \
^^ * +
: *HHHM'<|rt||'Mf: |
?WNrtH4-fC4 TJ?THfft
f^rf 7 ^ |r<nrf ^ft: 1 1 \ Il
RnPTT: ^^ II ^ Il
*5 fartHH'IKHrf'ft J^RTf T4<fr4L I
Tfrrawr 4uiRh rr^R ^^ li ?
??;7 srf : * tfrftr ^ *p: H v
*T TR4Wr|?Tff^rf: All^girH: 4 H
^^^ #?*%^?51 4 ^. I
<'^|: *PT%fl ^Nf: "^" ^^: Il { Il
T ^^? ^ 51?: I
^^ HgMiffr 3fP*rfa? spt M
^^-. I
fr? J?: <*< 5^snf^Tf frg T % ' II
w: rrg " ^^1'?* ^^''': ** I
1HT-*lP'M*IM4dHWMI4<KI*n'
No. 275 is a Digambara book of great interest, a copy of which was
No. 275.
The TattvAr-
thavrttikavykhynlamkfira-
(1 ^^
lt "PPf"" *
me to consist of three parts. First an

original text in stras, which are ascribed
alike by SvetAmbaras and Digambaras to Umsvti, a teacher

whom both sects place before the Christian era. On each stra,
there is a short commentary or rarttika, followed by an estended
79
commentary.
In the Trthakalpa of Jinaprnbhasri, a Svetmbnra book obtained since the close of the year under report, it is stated
of the teacher Umsvtivchaka, that among the five hundred com
positions in Sanskrit to which he owed his fame, he was the author of
a Tattvrtha and of a bhshyam to his own book. *' Pr^
K^far. In the present manuscript, at the end of the first adhyya,
but there only, occurs the following verse :
It would appear from this that the author of the extended com
mentary is either a pupil of a Jain teacher Akalanka, or that teacher
himself. Akalanka isa famous name among the Jains of the south, who
were and are, it must be remembered, Digambara Jains.* That he
forsook a king's court his father's houseto become a humble
student of religious things (Akalankabrahma), is, of course, charac
teristic of the times he lived in. Kings were the nursing fathers and
queens the nursing mothers of the religion he embraced. But I am
unable to account for his father's name, as it is given in this verse.
In a Digambara KathkoshA, which I hope to notice in my next report,
1 find it stated, that Akalanka and Nishkalanka were two sons of king
Subhatunga, whose capital was Mnyakheta. ubhatungais the other
name of Krishnariija, the Rashtrakta king of tha Deccan, who
" reigned in the last quarter of the seventh century of the Saka era,
i <?., between 753 and 775 A. D."t
The extract given in the Appendix from this book contains, among
other things, a succinct account of the Jain canon, which should be com
pared with Weber's paper on that subject ; and may be useful to
scholars in this country who cannot consult that work.
The twelve Angas are chrali, Strakritam, Sthnam, Samavyah,
Vykhyprajnaptih, Jntridharmakath, Upsakdhyayanam, Antakriddas, Anuttaropapdikadas, Prasnavykaranam, Vipkastrem,
Drishtivdah. It will be noticed that the name of the ninth anga is here
rendered into Sanskrit as Weber and Leumann have already suggested
it ought to be, Anuttaropapdikadas, not Anuttaropaptikadasa. The
account of the contents of the twelfth Anga or DHshtivda is noteworthy
* Bhtlingk quotes Wilson Sel. Works, p. 334.
t Bhandarkar's Early History of the Dekkan, p. 49. The KathAkosha, it
will be seen, connects the city Mfmyakheta with the earlier prince.
80
It noticed first one hundred and eighty different modifications of the

drishti or view that salvation is to be sought by works alone. Of these,
the doctrines of Kaukkala, KAiiva, Viddhi, Kausika, Ilari, SmasrumAn,
Chapika, Romasa, Hrita, Munda, Asvalaare mentioned byname. Next
the doctrines of those who in their scheme of salvation refused first
place to works, as Mnrchi, Kumra, Kapiln, Ulka, GArgya, Vyglirabhti, VAdvali, Matara, Maudgalvyana. Of these there were eighty-four.
Next the sixty-seven bad doctrines of the ignorant, as SAkalya, Vatkala
(Bshkala?), Kuthumi, SAnyamudri, ChAnAyana, Kanlhn MAdhyandina
Manda, Paippalda, BdarAyAna, Ambashtkrit, Airikyana, Vasu, and
Jaimini. Next the doctrines of those who made vinaya (reverence)
the one thing needful, as Vasishta, Prsara, Jatukarni, VAlmki, Romarshi, Salyadatta, Vysa, Elputra, Aupamanyava, Indradatta, Ayasthna.
Of these thirty-two were noticed. In all three hundred and sixty-three
different ways of attaining the same goal, all of which were noticed in
the Drishtivda, and conclusively shown to be vain. According to
this account the Drishtivda was in five parts, Parikarma, Siitram,
PrathamAnuyognh, Prvagatam, and ChlikA. Of these the Prvagatnm was in fourteen parts, UtpAdapurvam, Agryanam, VryapravAdam, Astinstipravdam, JnnapravAdam, SatynpravAdam, AtmapravAdam, KarmapravAdam, PrathyAkhyAnam, VidyAnuvAdain, Kalynam,
PiAnAvAyam, KriyAvisAlam, LokabindusAram.
The next manuscript contains the text of the ShatpAhudaor ShAtprNo. 277. The Shatnr- bhrita of Kundakundchrya, a teacher of
bhritatkft. A commentary Te!lt antiquity and renwn, who has
on
KunclukundaeliArva's
...
, .
Shatpribhntam by Sri- hitherto, I think, been known to us by

Srutasigara.
name only, along with a very elaborate
commentary by one Sr-rutasgara.
Kundakunda's text is divided into six chapters called pAhudas or
prabhritas (theses ?), whose several names are given in a memorial verse
which the writer of the present copy puts before the beginning of the
commentary (in which, as is usual, the text is imbedded), and writes
in the red ink otherwise reserved for the prAkrit gtlis themselves :
I give as a specimen of the work a few gtlis from the beginning

of the sixth chapter, that on moksha, or final deliverance :--
"^ T^rKf ^r frf^rer^HT I

?57 opf <r?*T t^W M \ Il
IK TBE BOMBAY CIBCLK.
81
"Glory, glory to the divine being who, destroying within himself

karma (works), and leaving off every external thing, obtains that self
whose essence is knowledge."
4târ ^ <4 4<h*iKuijji ^ n

" Having first done honour due to that divine being who lives in the
full light of knowledge boundless and most excellent, who alone is pure,
1 sing of that perfect self which is attained by the saints."
*' 3T at 3T?4t * ^* i
sts^rwtw srrm ? . H *
" That self which to know is to be a saint : which, inviolable, imper
ishable, incomparable, when the saint sees face to face, he obtains
everlasting deliverance."
5T<*liT ^^= sircaron- g 34<* I

**4+rt*n>^* 4*441 TTtT 4^t II v u
" The organs of sense are the outer self: the thought in the heart is
the inner self: that divine thing that is free from the stain of karma
is the highest self."
*M< d*rt-=lT 3HCR' ^Hrir ^ I

TT4ft 4<4hiu1 fr*Cr fingir ^ n
" He who has loosed himself from sin, and the body of sin, (the
krmanasarra) becomes a perfect and eternal one, blameless, allknowing, pure in soul, exalted, a ' winner of the fight' (a Jina), all
blessing and all blessed."
^1 34i.4l jf<4l 41 firf^T I
?nnwf < Fsprfttf? I| $

" Rising to the height of that inner self and leaving off the outer
self in all three ways (i.e., thought, word, and deed), he sees himself
to be one with that Highest Self: this is the doctrine of the Saints
(Jinendras)."*
fH^T
fM?
"gftTTTT
3T5gr^ffT
t'R*iqKul)gjri^gtet
fli|M-=lt
Il I
* In a note the commentator enforces this doctrine by the following verse,
which is fonnd in Mnatung's Bhaktmarastotram :
Tfll^fttq H<4-^l "^ f^K 44rf7f ??!1^: l
mftwiirribrt^ft^wrt 5 4t forrhitq4i4.tiffr ||
" If, J inuiulra, your power is great, it is because the wise look into their own
heart with the consciousness that they and yon are one : let one whom a snak
has bitten, drink water, being fully persuaded that it is the nectar of the god,
ad it will check the ravages of the poison."
82
" If a man fall from his true estate, and, beguiled by the senses, lore
the things of this world, he will, ah foolish one I mistake his body for
his true self."
5* rftrfH ? "
'* And as with his own body so with the bodies of wife, children, and
friends, the wise man should consider well how they are lifeless things
taken up for. the time by the bearer."
tf4<KI$*l4 ^ *m ifffr II % II
" But men in their folly, not considering the truth of things, look
at wife and children, and know not what is self and what is not self."
Pr*gHT%q t3ftf?retSIHI$ul4Trf%3ft*nfri
'TrfaTTTTtf' r ^^ 4*p II \*l\
" And cleaving to the wrong doctrine, rooted in the wrong way ofthink
ing, they grow in folly as they persist in calling their bodies themselves."
wr *f iff % fivi \x
' But the ascetic who takes no thought for the body, who is indiffer,
ent alike to pain and pleasure, who calls nothing his own, who begins
nothing, (i.e. does nothing that has the seed of another fife in it),
who knows himself, he attains to everlasting rest."
<** fttMt ?% **? i

n^r f^44<l4^f 444-R4W II II
" He who loves the world is bound in the chain of works. He who
loves it not is loosed. This is in brief the doctrine of the Jinas with
regard to deliverance from spiritual bondage."
In the commentator's colophon to several of the divisions of the work,
I find it stated that the author of the gths boasted of five names in
all (nmapanchakavirjita), r-Padmanandi, Kundakundchrya,
Elchrya, Vakragrvchrya, Gridhrapichchhchrya, and wasche
pupil and successor of r-J inachandrasribhattraka. Of himself rutasgara tells us that he wrote this commentary at the request of SriMallibhshana, thnt he was skilled in Sanskrit and in Prakrit poetry,
and that he was the pupil of Ori-Vidynandi, and the grand-pupil, if
I may coin a word for prasishya, of ri-Devendrakrti. The spiritual
lineage
Kundakundchrya, Padmanandi, Devendrakrti, Vidynandi, Mallabhshana,
83
in that order occurs at the end of a copy of Hemachandra's Prakrit

Grammar in the Bodleian Library (Aufrecht's Catalogue, p. 180);
though there Padmanandi is distinguished from Kunkundchrya,
andthe language used would seem to indicate for the other names that
the succession is not from master to pupil, but includes several gps.
Kundakundchrya is a noted name among the Digambara Jains ;
but the Svetmbaras also quote him with respect, and according to
one Svetmbara tradition, he stood at the dividing line of the two
churches, and was largely responsible for the Digambara heresy. His
commentator is a fierce Digambara, and amply fulfils the promise with
which he starts, that he will devote the greater part of his attention to
crushing the rival sect.
But his zeal in that matter throws what seems to me Kundakunda's
own indifference to doctrinal disputes, which may have arisen after his
own time, into strong relief. I will give two examples, the latter of
which has an interest of its own.
The first two gths run as follows:
^TP"f ltSlfa ^Wf>4 +H4IH ^ II
WIHfM *T*% Z4Jt fuN4V *iU"( I
That is
"First doing due reverence to Vardhamna, that Bull among the
most excellent Jinas, I proceed to expound the perfect view in order
but concisely.
" Righteousness, whose root is knowledge, was taught by the saints
to their disciples : he that hath ears to hear let him hear it, but let
him not deliver it to those who have not that knowledge."
The dedication here to Vardhamna, the last Trthankar, is a stum
bling-block to the commentator, with whose sect it is a rule to begin
all such invocations not with the last, but with the first of the Jinas.
But rutasagara is equal to the occasion. He construes jinavaravrishabhya, which looks suspiciously like 'best of the Trthankars,' to mean
' excellent among the Trthankars,' and sees in that very expression
the necessary reference to all as of equal dignity. In his comment on
the second verse, he changes Kundakunda's simple, and intelligible
precept to his disciples not ' to cast their pearls before swine' into a
fierce command to have no dealings, not to speak to, not to honour,
not so much as to give bread to, those of another faith.
84
OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OF SANSKRIT .
I said that my other example was one of considerable intrinsic in

terest. The last chapter in this book treats, as we have seen, of
moksh, or final deliverance, a state far transcending, it must be re
membered, that life in heaven to which all may aspire. One of the
chief points of difference between the Svetmbara and the Digambara
Jains is as to the position of women with regard to this highest state
our human nature can reach. The Digambaras say a woman cannot
attain final deliverance ; the Svetmbarasand to this we may perhaps
conjecture they in part owe their comparative preponderance say that
the way there is open without distinction of sex.* The controversy,
whose last ebbing wave we may trace in the woman's franchise question
of to-day, is a very old one, andwas not confined to India. Witness
the words in which the Apostle claimed it for the gospel he preached
that, making no distinction between Jew and Greek, bond and free,
it also knew neither male nor female.
On this important question Kundakunda preserves, so far as I can
see, an unbroken silence. Butin one place he is enforcing the doctrine
common now to both sects, that without entering the religious life no
one can attain final deliverance ; and Srutasgara eagerly fastens
upon his teaching there as implying that no woman can be saved, since,
according to srutasgara, no woman can enter the religious life.
Kundakunda's gth is as follows :
ft ^ prc**<t faffr * PrarWt I

3TrfTfi% gtr -strtm % Pi ff
This innocent doctrine Srutasgara perverts as follows :
jfnftarr ^ fraT: *^ 1
gf^r wftfrr ** tTpapi I ** i
q^fiT^T TpTVPI " 4ff "* I

The difference is not in the end such a material one as the reader might
suppose. I asked the priests of a temple in Jhalr Pthan, dedicated to
Neminth, if their saint was to be supposed to have had a mother, and if he
had, what they thoughthad become of her. They said yes to the first question,
and wore in no way disconcerted at the second. Neminth's mother, in their
view, must long ago have been re-born as a man, and from that vantage point
climbed to everlasting rest.
IN BOMBAT CIRCLE.
85
^Tpift 3fr# rrirt ^: l f&ft * nm i ivtt^ I ^^4R4^l|r4^'l<tl3Tr?PT5:J4rfIrf T ?wrt ?%V I rfl 4 P5PT ^ ^ <? ?: 3>*t <7*% I *#
jit . f^TT **3 5^''>: ! ^ ^ ^ 4rt4lû^lRÎI3w ^ I <)1^11' ^ ^^^^
*: ( ^rr ) *rff P=y^ tst gf?rfi)HHtR*qf ^,^ i

f% fff 7: ? *41-<^ I St ? 4W 4<*14ul T^'irfrT 3TT4T:
SfrTfTFcT ^^ 5?5: I '- 4% ^ =?: fTcTT
1% I
I may notice briefly the authors from whom Srutasgnra, himself a
poet good alike at Sanskrit and Prakrit, makes frequent quotations.
Akalankadeva's name we have seen in connection with the commentary
on the Tattvrtha. He is also the author of a work called Aptammnsa, which is represented in our collection. Asdhara was a Jain
teacher, who lived in Samvat 1296 = A.D. 1240, and wrote, among
many other works, a commentary on Rudrata's Kvylamkra.*
Indranandi bhattraka does not seem to be otherwise known.
Two copies of a work by Asdhara, called the Dharmumritam are now in onr
collection, one examinod by mo in the year under report, which fell to my col
league, Professor Bhandarkar, and one which has come into my hands during the
current year. Both copies contain a valuable prasastiwith a commentary,
according to which Asdhara's native country was Sapdalakshaya, the Laoand-a-quarter country, whose ornament Skambhar is. Skambhar, accord
ing to the commentator, isa lavan karavisesha, so that we are to recognize in it
the great Sambar salt lake near Jeyporo. He was born in a great fortress of
that country, Mandalakara, the son of Lakshana, and his wife Srratn, of the
illustrious stock of tho Vygreravlas. His son, by his wife Sarasvat, named
Bahala, was a favourite with, or pleased by some particular work, king Arjuna,
who, according to the commentator, was king of Mlva. This is tho Arjuna,
" probably the sovereign of Malva, " whom the Yftdava king Senghana over
threw. (Bhandarkar's Early History of the Dekkan, p. 82.) Udayasena muni,
friend of poets, called him the " Klidfisa of his time," and Madanakrti yatipati, a " Mine of Learning."
When the " Mlechchha king," identified by the commentator as Sshibandina
Turshkarja over-run the Lao-and-a-quarter country, Asdhara, with many
others, fled from that destroyer of the faith into Malva, theD safe-guarded
by the mighty arm of a Vindhya king, and took refuge in DhsrA. There he
86
OPEKATIONS IN SEARCH OF SANSKRIT MSS.
Umsvti bhattrnka is, of course, the famous teacher of that name.

Devasena may be the author of the Daranasara of which mention
has been made. Nemichandra is referred to as the author of the
Trailokyagrantha. " Vranandi's pupil Padmanandi" is mentioned.
Pjyapda is repeatedly quoted ; and in several places the name of one of
his works, Isbtopadesa, is preserved. On this the aforementioned Asdhara wrote a commentary. I havealready said that Somadeva's descrip
tion of Vairgyam is referred to, with a quotation from his Yasastilaka.
Samantabhadra and Subhachandra are, with Asdhara, styled
Mahkavis. Yogndradevabhattraka is the author of the Paramtmapraksa in this year's collection. Other names found are Lakshmchandraguru and Sivakoti AchArya.
I will close these hurried notes with the announcement that in the
end of the vear I was fortunate enough to
Merutunga's Prabhanf M
, Prabhandadhachintamani.
.
.
chintmani, a work of great historical im
portance which we have long been endeavouring to add to our collection.
I have placed this copy in Pandit BhagvanlAl's hands, for whose
forthcoming History of Guzerath it was very necessary, and that
received an enthusiastic welcome from " Bilhana, Lord of poets, and chief
minister of the Vindhya king." The name of this king of Mlva is Vijayavann.
Thero he learned the Jinaprantavkeuetram, (which, according to the
commentator, means both the Jain canon, and the Jainendravykaranam)
" from Mahavira," i.e., says the same authority, from Pandit Mahvira,
the pupil of Srimaddharasena, the Pandit of VAdirja,
When Arjunaascended the throne A.ldhara settled in the city Malakachchha,
and became a famous teacher. The commentator gives pandita Devachandra
as one of the pupils whom he conducted across the sea of grammar right to,
the further shore, V/ldndra Vilakrti as one of the foes who " went down "
( rf^T5^) before the sword of his logic, and Bhattraka Devavinayachandra
one of the many who walked through life securely, having been persuaded by
hi* words to take the Jain doctrine as a lamp to their feet. From him, too,
Blasarasvatmakkavi Madana learnt his art. Besides the Dharmmritam to
which he composed a panjika-satika, and his commentary on Budrata, sdhara,
who seems to have been a sort of Jain Admirable Crichton, wrote, (1) a com
mentary on Amarakosha, (2) Arfidhanasra, (3) a commentary (Uddyota) on
Vfigbhata's Ashtngahridaya,(4) a commentary on the Isbtopadesa, a book which
we shall see, has Pujyapda for its author, (5) Jinayajnakalpa, with a nibandha,
(6) Trishaahtismritinstram, with a nibandha, (7) Nityamahoddyotastram,
Prameyaratnkara. (8) Bharatesvarf bhyudayakvyam.(9)BhuplachaturTinsati,
(10) Mlirsdhanatkfi, and (11) Sahasranmastavanam, with a nibandha.
IN BOMBAY CIRCLE.
87
learned scholar has favoured me with the following account of it for thepurposes of this Report :
" Folios 81. Slokas 3004. MS about 200 years old. Generally
correct. Character Jain NAgari.
" This is a rare book. The late Mr. A. K. Forbes obtained a copy of
it through a merchant named Virchandji Bhandri. (Compare Preface
to Forbes' Rs MA1A.) This copy was presented by Mr. Forbes to the
Forbes' Qujarati Sabha, but is now missing. Much of it hes been used
by Mr. Forbes in his Rs Ml.
" The author is Merutunga, who finished it at Wadhwn on theVaiskha full moon of Samvat 1362 " The concluding Terse is
îiy'iww ^ 1% nf*ra*r f*mr$ il

f. ., this short work was finished on the full moon of Vaiskha, years
thirteen hundred plus sixty-one having passed away one after another.
The work is divided into five chapters or praksas, apparently with
no system. Each prakAsa again is divided into sections or prabandhas, each relating a story. The work begins with a prabandha on>
Vikramditya, the traditional founder of the Samvat era, which con
tains a good deal o{ myth, and is valueless for purposes- of history,
(folios 1 6). Then follows a short story of a previous birth of SAtavAhana (folios 6 7). Folios 79 give a short notice of the ChvdA dy
nasty, and then follows a long and detailed history of the Chalukya
kings of Anhilvd. In connection with them the kings Bhoja and
Munja, the Lkh of Kutch, and the kings of Smbhar are noticed.
The following forty-seven small stories or prabandhas are incidentally
given :
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
^'^^:.
.Jpnnr^TtcTrrsrerffrf.
^'^':^4^|4:fa rH d rsfcfr^S^ 4 Vf-
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
:To 1^.
$4Meh<4H4fo:.
%^ **:.
(16) !.
(10) *4*:.
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(il) ^.
(22) '-
(8) sfrifu^* 4)*T.
TT^f^^rf^rf^Tr: "*:.
4r*W*4.
^-<i^t^lH^4IHul?H :
88
(23)
(24)
(25)
(2G)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
sftmnT4t4:gRTjftfWto'opT^j:.
PT '<
4- [Tf^T^:^^^^?:.
^:.
^*K*Tlrtl44:^:.
rj^l^STTO^T:.
?519?#':-
(34) ^^^!!-
(35)
(3C)
(37)
(38)
4* 44&-"
^>!**:$^4 S^lKH^t
(39) IftqRp^Wt.
(40) :-
(4i) ciT>rn%mr(42) ^^: 1:.
(43) tfr^NnrnffPT'(44) ^(4<<ll^^44':.

(45) '-
(46) qprfita*:.
(47) 6<4:Folios 5864 give a detailed account of the two famous Vghel
kings, Lavanaprasda and Vradhavala, and of their ministers, Vastupla
and Tejapla. This ends the fourth chapter.
The fifth chapter (folios 6480), called the Prakrna Prakasa, or
Miscellaneous Chapter, has the following miscellaneous prabandhas :
(l) iftfa!KTr*c* % 4tf 4*4-,
(13-15) ^^|511%-
(2) **>
(3) *
(4-6) Ultmffru&t TqfrT:
irarrTf%?TE^rff
(8) '
(9) F4K44':
(10) ?^.1<%- 44:
(17) ?^5?:
(18) 5^7^-
(20) |??*:
C2I) 3n(lfOTr
(22) ***:
(11) '?:
(12) 3'1<<!4<?:
(24; OfTOTT^rnri vn<i4i?:
With the twenty-fourth section the chapter ends. The last folio
and a half gives a short figurative story of Kumrapla's marriage
with AhimsA (non-killing) personified.
The work begins :
5: PiH>
ifcnfrrPT: & >|^ I
N THE BOMBAY CIRCLE.
89
iJ+.iTH>j4 fnrvJT^pfb-jro ^ i
^ftT^TFR^r^T^5^ RF^j M II
#%: PTffqTta: f%V ?? ^JVrT II V 11
TKTfTrPmr ?f?HîTj n \
f 3JT?TT ^: : HT %? rmTf>7HT I
?%?5 ^ ?
And ends :
(|*4<:| >*^^ *1^^^4?T^faf >?^*!)' q^HrPnR: 4*44 * *TTfe*TT: "

At the end of the extracts which follow this Report will be found
a Digambara PattAvali, or succession list of Iligh Priests, taken from a
copy of the Pkshikapratikramanakriy a part of the Avasyakastra
which has recently come into my hands. To this I can only call
attention here. It will be seen that Kundakundchrya's five names
are given ; and that the verse which Mr. Pathak has already quoted
occurs with the variant T^HfT:
During the year under report, the Agent to the Search, Mr. Bhagvandas Kevaldas, and the Shastri, Mr. Ramchandra, continued to give
efficient assistance. It would be impossible to speak too highly of the
disinterested zeal and the intelligence with which Mr. Bhagvandas
urges on the work ; while Mr. Ramchandra's extensive acquaintance
with Jain literature renders him a valuable assistant in a part of the
task that has special difficulties. I owe much also, as in the previous
year, to my friend Pandit Durgaprasda of Jeypore, with whom I have
been in constant communication while writing this Report, as well as
during my visits to Alwar and Jeypore. Lastly, it remains for me
to acknowledge the courtesy of the Committee of Management of the
Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, who have again permitted
this Report to appear as an extra number of the Society's Journal, and
have, as in the previous case, sanctioned a contribution of Rs. 400
from the Society's funds towards the expense of its publication.
EXTRACTS FROM MSS. BELONGING TO H. H. THE

MAHARAJA OF ALWAR.
THE RIGVEDA.
Khila II.
ii^^tn^r ^^^^ ^ I
irn ^ ssrfH =r g*rr?rW i

^ 4<if3iwi ' =%#; H H i frir*nr nra II
Khila IX.
Il fw II ?Rfn ^ ^ i%53T I
- TS fprf^ gcf II
it <r fr f^j r ^\ mitfi i
f^r %: Il
s 3rf>4.W4 ?N^ ^: I
3TRRT4- iTJTTfrfefr: ^^ II
5 4- &: *& s ^^\: tffatf I
Khila XIII.
*% ira rcT: " ^=='^ ^ *-^ I
=*r 4"wn? g îicnqfcFfrnftj 3=rrfr il
nnf^rf^ fe arf Tfwrt ^ i
fr4FT TqTt Hr g- 0 II
%m *y Ti h1 4i I
ttr^rerf ^rg m\ il
92
EXTRACTS PROM .MANUSCRIPTS BELONGING
? i: ^t^P-^ro II
\&\1ffflfcFF!^^? fr i
<4riJ<^cf 0 II
g ft^Tir gri wsgift i

) &- 3^2 I
wir- ' grg nsrft ^# [ il
: S^f 3= : &\ 1^: ^ I
\ ^ Tipirrfi: J^rf 5<'5^31 ^! il ^ il
griFft: Î^T^ |^? : I
$\: 44J$ W|fyu|44# fpf II
4ii4HlKt 14 # |
l^T: gÊTFTR 34% 5 I
f# 1^^5?^" i
% ^Rr Ti 4$ *t \ \ II
grgpft: gîfaftnmlT - I
rr^R %' i
fgasTfrgr^ t gfStf?:*" ^ il
^^ S* #FfR4T: I
TO H. H. THE MAHARAJA OF ALWAE.
: : \
^ ?| ^": i
jps^ffifc i
Khila XIX.
II II "* II 1 \ : fbgbtf \- I
# nft =preitr prrir sqfct^ i
?: ^ff^r IT<T tfgwf: II
* f^TT ^- II
iWr' *itit4iW i
?% fit ? i
ari^frtffaf 4 mtiFftivr II
% fre'tf gqfTf f$ ^ I
*| 1 %f fT II
fc *siW | ^:< I
'+ ^ 5 ^f 5^ : Il
-
\1*-
^ II \ ||
>
^rif "bft 1* i
? tc gr^5% p^rg- #r Il
firptMb 5:%: i
93
94
Wffi ^<Tf M I
*$ ?% fifrgpr %tf fiTcir^: H
%^[ R'r^ ff r| 4Rpf II
i% % sjra^ & i
rr^'r ?pf 11? ^*< i

Khila XX.
55 4t 4i ^ &w cftr ftfr ?rr II V

? RT ^fSTP fifRTlfe II
^:? ff% ^rg<pfrcfa 1 1

Jr ^^ ^ f^f il
grpr ^r 1** '^nfgfew? pr i
wjft f^g % % #
g^: irrf Tit /^ " ^' I
? flfSpfcqfflr ^Td^^f rlft Il * It
^ M i% & \$t fiwft I
TO H. H. THE MAHARAJA OP ALWAE.
95
? STRWrfr ^ 5^rr ^r%^^ il

tpnTcfg ^^ \jctt ^ i
5^ ^- |^ de w ? %\ il
m |"^f fSf'T *RT*wrj i
ffci R^ JTT3I ifa' 4fr rqr i
^rr^T r^RTlt %TWFT #5*% ft^^T HpWT f Il \ Il
Khila XXI.
fe' ir girir'tr^ % ?ftcT^r ff tr gfifferj >* u
|t<Jr* 3SI*"rif ÎT %: ^ I

*4 * "pfe rt0!^ cri Il
iMi Pnfr gf 57 il
^ ^5 Wflr 54 Xf II
?: ^ <rritf? ir H
^f 5- rrrtr %? ? afrfr i
96
Khila XXII.
5 5 4Tf " 1 1
rot ? ; M tf^cfr i
mri^r ^^ 2*# il
3THJf 1^| 3" I
44 F% ^ 5 ^^' I
frrpri frcmfbr fr' i* ic ^ ^rri fftnf
3TR fNw * W I
^-ff
JIWTtfM:
^<f
**?
II
.

\
g^ ? ' iflj^r q-f i^rer l
i " fair %ffr ^^^!?5^: H
*"| fj^nPrr*? \ \ ^ il
rrqwsi ~ "nrrf^f fr
^ : JTrfffT: ^: ^TJT: pfa: I
5 ^-: $ ?\ \<>
Khila XXV.
f ST4- -tw || 41 || || : I
^ Hfi^fr II
$: **- I
*1% J^TTrWg & II
T^faT i?#=r pt afPkai i

? fi* fT: ff54 1-*
i % % ^ l
. . the mahIrja op alwab.
97
^^ mi mi 4%tL%$' Cff(3f 4: Hfptf5f frnj *- sr^r * ftrqr ST ^^T II ^ Il

1^% ^tpi ^' | 4$ft- I
%^t arfrinTPiRi 4f? i iikzi ?g *? t Il

q^ TO^rfiF $z*w f^r' i
#^^^*^|' H 4
qr^Wt # ^ I
SC^Tf^RT $ PTfTTfrfrr II
>4ifil<|U||4% ^rfr-KrgR:: I
U: W4W %ZT TsWr fPTF: T^lfr fbof: =*
* II ^ Il
3HNMI ? JsS3rf& ^^ I
a^f: ^< gt=5tTl^ J? 55 WTC II
^ ^*: ^rrer 541^44 J - I
4R'r 5|^ * * II
^ri^*? mi mt \%': :
*** I
^ ? % < ||
fw # #g3far j^wtr
98
^rf^fti'ltfn ^^^ 5"hi4h 55 q^rrfc 5: I
% 5ftf|- *: H i\ |t
$\ ^ i
^ 4zfe fr i - frw II
i 4^q- sm '^ \
qtf^ts: ?ti: 44JS M: Il
$ 4r ?: - I
5[#*? 5^ " -, *
5? r 5^ f4ll
* " ? i f I ^- i q^rfl" = I
T$i I
? fW I arfris:: I ^ 44i(4l II U H
W&4L H4\h44. : Tf^ T ^%: I
' TT% 4f 4M*4dg 5 f>> Tf% #TUI*r Il *8 II
fcT ^:*: ||
TO H. H. THE MAHARAJA O? ALWAR.
99
THE SHITTA KAUMUD BY OR-VIDYBHJSHANA.
*tWW<<l sprfcT II
1<4^1*1< Hlf^*lii<0 II \ II
*ft: 4%: ÎRT WtfNh 1 ft$t ^-! I
*llfî4bt-4y:*H/l+: ^t Nll^TlWKS1^^ II \ Il
41 4f|illlli|Sl I : ^:
^rfîftT^ltq- 31 *<*1|)^||-*11 +K)u<4ll< I
1*1^1=^^: % qt 44t ^ ^'": >5+<14<1<!?4: $ WW$WWt&TK&\4\ : J ^: 44\t -^- %cR <dl<4w #
J<T fftf^: I 44fuU PrtT 4T^ T *W # 3d^l<g4l
frw < ^ njrtt y ,+11^ 4"ftnrc^ s^fcFFq^rr 1 f^R': i ^ wif^ ; 4+<uH4ifcNig; fctffacj#T4T cnr ^ $1 I 31^?5 **?
$[ wwt \
HdlfH^* qt ; I
& % \
fiM facTTST ft I
ctfi R'pwiHl ^ ^:
5% q-jnyfErtr ; Il ^ Il
fff^RT'lF^r = fr *^ #"rfq q | 3T3T
100
f^ffharejl II
^ $ fwreRrrTCTSrAfJ : fT: Il
flWIRtq" : Il
frqH: T?T: l^l+tff; Il

yif^+y<I(ii+Hi 4flt""llifi^l4+W*l: >^<; Il
THE NKHYANASTRAPADDHATI.
glWW4*t?l44H:.
^ RHPfo NKHrll-KI^FSiWr |
111^ 4lHI<{Jlfr4T
cTFT^^KKTiÂTtj^^RT : Il \ll
: 44lf*44!4H4cft||J|<4 ^^ S SHAIKH uNHdlMK frr $ II II
^^^^-.
aT^TW RI^T ?f Hitr 4WS\ 2t^wr^rR^rtiy^<r=iecii (>??1-*^ I
: TFR": Il Il
fir *r 3sffrryfc^r ^ iwfa'sr JJddH^4H4*ÎN-l4I^Rr^ I
TO H. H. MAHARAJA OP ALWAB.
? ^^ ^<?! : I
iTFfr^^rwt w^<yfctf ^*?
3T%? 44t \ j^-îwrt : IK II
3ft SR^W : ssn4teârfn
' MrJUAMytr \ <T:SPT I
-ytfT ^^: %4t RST^ ^TIR"5 sTST II * |l
4*f RTWpdifhHAId ^^ iRf || II

Sit ^^5^^=5^1%2"
f^rST-if^frcTJH^ I if'ftlK 8": I
^ 97rt4M+ci 1 4ffl$MW: 4 ^< ^^ " "T II ^ Il
4TFI^T^-Jd4,H+rt4l ( : I
^ ^ ^*^ irtirf^ i^44W'^qT II \o II
^h<h^4< ftrfcnq^r
4W ^TRTWrr (^ u
5TMPT4FT - trrcu artr II
THE SUDAR SANASAM HIT.
^ftPFTrr- : I '- 1
\ .* ^^: |
"-=?< ? II \ II
101
102
EXTRACTS PROM MANUSCRIPTS BELONGING
r^qftf^f ^|?<^<|1^ il
<Hl|: f^T -^. |
^^^ft^NÛftdT II II
*W +^NKI<R I
3TW53: arFRPf: I cR^ ^^ i .
SIT? f^T^rr: 1 cR m 1+511: I ^ **&4

+| iffftr^ ^^- m m$mw\: \
cTT R^rr ff I $: I ^g'RTfa'ffPT TW qt^^ft^N^lcKIlHl^TT ? Pp: I 1<14>|4|'11<44-H4.I ?5T^: I JST ^ H^: I
4
4K-UHff* ^ dTOT H<4IM I <? cMlMI^
^^PRc^; %1%1%% 3781 I 4KTWTRTW dWIWH:
q-^NH ^ I fTfft": TWPPfr II Il
f 4i4ijyRui ^ 1 1
^^ \
1 ti<Hl4$d *[$*'- : **:
THE NTIMANJAR OP DYDVIVEDA.
*' : I
KfRrf 4ui*4il gf^ ^r ^. i
^rtcMt \
gwT ^ j^tr % srhrtî
+1+1^3 <110: Il II
" t% ' ^-In+i

<* itfci^ ftMHK 5<HHI< I
Jerri ^T^t^T gjfrr
TO H. H. THE MAHKJA OF ALWAK.
103
\^ . I
3T?^R fci gTT^Fftr^gffir:
S% -: cT^luj^d fciTS 4W4R I
SUPl^cll I
^ ^d^KH+JlR^+l II
frfq-^wftel \ 4 $\ J^T-S^T: I
w 5trT ^f" $# ^ JTt-CTJRr: II
1*1*11+<1
\\
?f ^H^lfr^Tf^ ^fcrtsnfr^r ?: : Il
THE PADRTHDARSA.
ft -^ : I ft^T4#^TI^ I
#: tow " ^ \
< î+ ^ rr4 I
<* J f ^/^: II ^ II
THE SRKRISHNABHAKTICHANDRIK
ANANTADEVA.
fa %rjirn:: Wrf \ ^refhi i

tpishr: f $( crfcrt tr: coiffai \
i
^ dj<4*jfdsHMIMM 5T%3' H IA1 d | M H ^WSJrrPT fTPFt I
WR ^<1)<*1- ( : II
104
IXTRACT3 FROM MANSCEIPT3 BELONGING
4ttt .
MAHBHSHYATIPPANAM.
53) ^^^ :.
ssftJFftrPT W =# ?^ anWpT ff ^^[
5TINIW: tHUufadlRfKIW^:
? ?%*1$| g>ft: \ ll
ttr r34RHTc*cT: %iM^tnr?fR^lffN^^rTWfbreTPT jrfr tfef* II
4HMIl-<4KtiK^d4 4 1 4 W ifa d flqbtH& Il ^ II
3T>2TPTrll'44}|Jl frcfhr ^Wi^ I
fHRJ R^rRaTcRl f: || ^ Il
ffct ^-^^^-^
5 - - 4IW^ sT4T^ R<fH4if^%
THE SMRITIRATNKARA BY SR-VENKATANTHA.
fJR<||cK<:MÎ*4l*T:.
an ^H+HIlt: FfnRi+^0 I
^RT^pr ^ TR^tT STT Wft II \ II
rfo ^^ srfg-rW RlMKI+4 tffacT 4W. I
flTFtffaW4^rNH: *- C^fa: II
*WWt Kdl 5^T 4lfl^4> 1+4: * Xfo
frwMc^+w ^ %|4|^5^ ^^^^^ %+1* ffcTJ ^Rk-hi+I **: *:
. . maheIta op alwae.
: f+dH 4WC Il
THE SMRITISUDHKARA BY SANKARA.
H^KriMi^^" y<*iRa<i'7H< I
3m<iwI ^^^ wmHt \ il

4F4\ tf rcrraTWRT: <1+<|: I
^^^: *#*+<1*. -: wt: Il

THE vegarAjasamhit.
r^JfIUI4IÎ ^FR[ ^-'^!^ ff
THE VYSASIDDHNTA.
>TfP qTWWT^T 440<^r^RT II \ Il

f% FTFi : f i^T^r R^STTT I
f^FT ^ &- Il ^ Il
^^ i ^+- ^ ^ i
4T3WR fiTFFT^r fc R^t il
105
lOG
EXTRACTS PROM MANUSCRIPTS BELONQIIO
SANDHYMANTRAVYKHYNAM BY BHATTOJIDKSHITA.
**1
^^-^ f" JJWIr+Kuiiq; 44$ : :

? \ W. : ^\"^ \14 I : 3pjRl<y|fcr 5?: I
^\^^^ ^1^1= 1\ II
THE KVYAPRAKSASANKETA.
ao
^ftjp^rnr : II
\\ ^ I
)(\1 t^H rripr^ \
Wft WaTT; WIK*4~4*lf4KH t^TW 4<4Hfe<4HI
^^#^: I
SfbTHi $5"[37] 4W|d*W*ft?:H<t '+$* : || \
^ <\4>*?-4\ \^ *4H4 HH-d^ I
^ l Cefa" TfWR ^tfTîtW^ RTfcn^T ^><ra"CTTirq" ^f^R^^pT^R^cWI <4<1<^ %4Z4
*: 4fe gwfcTW iffa^: ^%^?^: 5>^ Il
CfcT <<1* TPT ": I \ I ^ +M4+RT"-
%: I fcfr rrRWreRiW^HP I *\ I
H. . THE MAHARAJA OF ALWAR.
107
JAYARMA'S COMMENTARY ON THE KVYAPRAKSA.

Il *11*1*1* ft4<MIT4<
> \ fk^4U4 II
+M44IAIAW agct frHteFT il \ Il

"|1*1*"^|1<1<5
frTf^T cn%R5"^Nr ^^ il II
F^Tf^rR'r^fr : ffrKFr : I ^: rjr f? $<. ^rft^rffiT , <hif
+iR*i)^q ^+ fW^rfcnrra wrc
^^^] 111 |%?-?%: ^^ îK+iîfnRR; i <rt cm = &($ ffTTRTRTR^'^Tcr^r ^H*u| 55%^^ frfraT
= c*f%% cR-ft^ I ^5^2 3iifc " cRr^ff^f^r r#5R3
bftftelTHW I +|R+II JTTdtffdMi iWNpM 4
^ R*i<rciTT cr" ^ Roftf^
iiRiifi^T fP ^^
iftir
*
J grfff:ffK
I ( '
*%fr I
ô
qfciTgqîRTrcrTjr ftf ^ f^+Mciî" ^pqwsr |

^^- 4(<14 rewrw P^-: 1 1 \ 1 1
"1?^ frTc^- f^ %": I
*rwr ^" qfrcqt wjqpcrr ^' --, \\\\\
^ | i
3T5RJRP1^ TJ: H^T 5: g^ Il \ II
^^ ^T -^: I
^jrfNtrt^jo: ^; Il Il
4Tf4CRiE^R^rqTf4T^T^r:T^m^rtrr^m' *[5+-
108
EXTRACTS FROM MANUSCRIPTS BELONG/NO
VAIDYANTHA'S COMMENTARY ON THE

KVYAPRAKSA.
an
'^ 44: II
cwmfH*TRr =T4Tfr fwHfrc: Il \ Il
fr^rffl^l^^^î^r^Ttt^": . I
aff-jcPiwKd) *\4'<\* il
reftr fasfar * I 1 1
^^1^^^^^%^|'^]' =^ 8 il
fftr ^^^?!^ I
k '&.
f^R^cRffi f^f[:] HMIriM "1 I
\ *\% m*FZmF44\ II < Il
ff^rr f^Tl:: mgw^fftf5^: i
3T%^TcT $W?ft II IT: iWtTcT H

sf
^^<^14^|?1|^^^^1-|-
T^fo+IÎ^Hl ZW 5: $:
THE COMMENTARY ON THE KVAYPRAKSA
CALLED VISTRIK.
Il *|o4U*T4IT^rfvilft*T
fpTPTT: 4*JWI: ^: TfcPIT:
iffHR cRT 5% f4*UWMlc*: Il \ Il
109
pRTftcTRT:^r: f^fi^ ^^ J^; 4TRFT: Il ^ Il

* :RT +M44iKIHCTITiT cTJiT: Il 3. Il
W5 fflnt * i^PT ": tlHiy II tf II
3TiMcTWNK4<4<l4K4
+11 lt nf WMeA ^rr^ raffa Mkfai^
: (' 4JT | II 4T4FR^R#^t
^fsq-q^RrilrrfriF : || \ ||
ô
smTFR^rnr f -^t I
' ^ ^ frq-pfa II
fr 11> $ gtf ^ *^ II ft*KI"l*fl'Hft I ^1^ RTO sft gfljl"Ud<lPlftfft II (^1||(1 fat || fo ooo
JAYADEVA'S CHANDRLOKA WITH THE COMMEN

TARY OF GGBHATTA.
^1^*-:-^^-% ^: fro ":
aijo H 3%" 4^<iUUyd 3i4-*rt5<=l
ijo xfo tfr^RfimT^crr^T IRRT4; I
fî grg; il u
qjFftfBBt^q spfcR^FrC: Il $ II &: Il
to 5[ spfrpfa iftsjpNr ^ WvR [] iTg"^r?fd"^fq;
Il Mt li TWFTi^rr ^*+* I
% rfci i3r%^T:i II
5??1<^^^111^1% I
S^^^^fPTfrfRîr II II
EXTRACTS FROM MSS. BELONGING TO PRIVATE LIBRARIES

IN ALWAR AND JEYPORE.
JYOTIRSA'S PANCHASYAKA.
3o
II ^ :
R<facHg*H: rFTpT: 1: Il \ Il
^l+l^Hd^l ijf? 43:4^ 3^H R I
: ^: *1*(\*. fcft
'^+^^ fIM4HI+4l^fH. i
lHJ+*4cl 5^<: *iFRH. H 4 H
ô
<<^-{$*1: I
ii=Ni+3TfWli*<f3i %5' Prefer
ft ft4ftkft<<l <Hw* : swra-: Il

THE GOLDHYYA OF NITYNAND'S SIDDHANTARJA.
3T3I iMMNl ^1^1^ Il
m4\: 3W 44M4 l?r: frt tft

RRT9T %1 fa^fr'^ffiH: Il \ li
EXTRACTS PROM MSS. BELONGING TO PRIVATE LIBRARIES.
Ill
iFMn^KîT^f & II II
%? CTC^T<faft '+K fc I
^^ f=RT ^^ ^% +"
cn^rfWftr Rff [*]^ +" R4": Il
14+<*^% :
+MH+dRl<f4*ll^4*|rtl qt =4W*lllfe[H I
ciwin+k" \tftf* %1 & ^sbti! 4%*:
4"o |
^< < ?r f^?T>g# ^rert ^

"? cfifWTRTf 4f5nfrq" #W4Tc* ^ I
^ ^ 3lWi4 <WW 5 IK II
4^^4^^^^^^Pr:tT:fT^'^Jf 4T^W II
trf g^rqrrt^TTJTiR- ^' J54; I
=? 4<+lo f $ 3T Tit | II ^ Il
W<smfeHi
(^
EXTRACTS FROM MSS. PURCHASED FOR GOVERNMENT.
No. 2.
HAGNADARPANAM BY PRTIKARA.
afro
ftip^rnr . mt<\4 II
f- TRî41TRW ?^ I
oJ^PfTf 4W fmk*: II
JTW-HWI^r UdliMfffcTTft gn i
rrPr f^T ! _
- ^ ^^ i
% R%Ts " '^TFifq' *!% Il
?1 WHI: ...^: I
N^lwSdd^ ^; Il
^5# *?* Cfcr frfSfRff RR^H^Ft Sfr fffrf
"
T57PT lT Tntet ^ I S49 Tf ^^": I

SWI 9W flPW 5 % I
|
cTf 51> I
fjTwmH \ $ i
1^=1-*?11* " R4% I
TfSldW N*^dl^%^r II U II
No. 3.
HYAG.NADARPANAM BY PRTIKARA.
an
MWÎW I
4,4rt<tcHH<iAN" ^^<*1 freier I
EXTRACTS FROH MSS. ACQUIRED FOR GOVERNMENT.
118
?> ipir t wrHrp fcsrrc;

t <4\^\ 41 <4<| ^ w mwnkjrt
fit sOqi %^ r54^5 * ^1
f iff: fff fr ftp-; sr iRTT = ^: 3TR7%3-3$PrcRt
S4": 3Ri^t iff % r

<ô affJffTff: ^ 4 & If fafg" ^
3% ^ f% =ir7 << ^Tff: $ ^
<^ rsrprt #: II
No. 5.
THE CHHA.NDOVICHAYA.
ffe
%f)'|UlW ffff: <1 II

apiTT: IJ^Tf tf^ff <>1<** ffPT^gfTfftl^sitf-
ô
aTSFTTTf^h' fffc*rW 4t? RH: I
^ tt ; il
\ yifdl Îfciilfa^ffWr: I
TTt ^4 I&F **% ttfcW: Il
= 57* sp3ra4 ?rr : n
u<f)N4 % qfaFTjffi*Tcr: I
EJ^Hlfrltt OTSfaffffffiM" ^ ffJcffcff? '1"
ffPff: Il II S II 34ftTR *m\ Il
ffct -' inTfff II
114
EXTRACTS FROM MANUSCKirTS
No. 10.
THE MANTRRTHADPIK BT SATRTJGHNA.
^^ -
dWKI*)^[^r] $1 ?? 5^^: ^: ": I

*ft ^1(1WfrfrTTfiRt SWTcTT *
>?: >^1-4 fl^RTpI^T: II H
^KKI4[f4r]rpsft sft[41%]4<4.4rt4H4Kiy^-4: I
4*HI [>][>] ^ <u|fil<Rl q4|{=fl$
^[&: $> ^ % %]^ II

*1'<[> ] ^^^ I
zzf ^ Jiufwft sljuiw ^" I
3<ic4iHwl4 IUm^M < *r rtlr: Il * Il

^ () fWtsniq- qr 4P I
#[t]t ^ * fW I
wîwo: *[] II ^ Il
far î<i?4iwt 1 i
^<-3} j^rg; \o
ô
'Tit' <*4I<?4M
| MtopiirfcTPT mi4<I4+nI 4K4R^<:
No. 11.
THE MDHYANDINRANYAKAVYKHY.
%flj|"HiM w CWTtfqT ffrTR^ d4H4-4J4 *( ^
ACQUIRED FOR 00 VER t MENT.
ô
115
44 W4 3TT 3T 2( fT ) ^'- : ^ ^1% 4<1-
.*1^1*4 4Hw(s" )wni$4<4<i*j * ^ \$: : W414 [3] U4: 4
fktFSwwt \4&)\^ fkipw*i: ^^^

i" : aiwrqtqrr "^^ (
+N$d: 4+i*TI<l UcffcMb 44epr: II 4 II
No. 17.
VYAGNADARPANAM BY PBTIKARA.
1<*141iflW.
ftr^RTni 44:
^44^: WTfcfrsnafojs- WR- fKl!cttl4h i^lK
# wrg^ ? & f**ft ir \ \\{

i ^ r^r i g;
^: I *t * : WS*: <'| II
No. 18.
THE SNKHYANAKHBRIHATSAHASRAM.
ssfto
% fa^lyrlrf^ sqtggwff ; qr 4*)

h^ i RM fcftaw wfr sqtgfsnffar I
ro ^ * f^raw ?; f%
116
TRACTS MAJSCBIPTi
No. 22.
THE JALANDHARAPTHAMHATMYAM.
5- ^fr s#FRrnr 44":
MtPRMjirttrja' gr%jffru; i
^ <111< ?f^T ftnlOTPfPr II \
Wo
< 3 frflo<H I
^^: fftft W W^ri^ II
5' if fRft &
* ^ STRt R47^T ^: Il \V%\ Il ( ^TW4 )
^}' *&;
No. 44.
THE GRIHASTHARATNKARA.
('11.
<tfi: TRR^cTfR: *|: $14<|: *?'|: STSHTRT: RjriTcT: JFRRRt: 4M*: <!MMMd<J|: qtT=RRTT: 3fHI*4fi^Rr4S'4lfl<il: ^nTWT^rfR': 4lil44cR*T:
^TqTrVft^clt: 4Klf<l4H<U*|: -: JMMMdW
^: RTTfc - JR: fci *<-1<1 ^MlA
J5^% R^KÎ^^lfr#MTR ?TTR ff^RTg^R
f l^^t =1+*('|: Il
No. 46.
THE JTIVIVEKA BY GOPNTHAKAVI.
Il sfrTFRT 3PTR *fr JFftTR 44": Il

^ Ailî<l
^" J*T3*PPnft RRS-: W^RT% II
gwrjsnnR; 3i% * iigfi4r

ans^r,41?fFT sTS ^: Il
T4T: inft 3TSTT #* 55" I

WlftO fe*&rf\ sTSPTT TTPRt T: I
k < ^% ^^ W- 1
aNicH: ^) ^rq- aiIcii<*hi-
r T ^rftrf ^R- tf* R^ qifljfijqx^
t \\ <<) \o) R^T^T: I

^ f cfsgf^44.IH. 1 1
^ g*# ^r^farn" w: i
HKI4UIWT ^^: !^: I
& 4#JjrifR: Il
=MKW-WI ^ ?: I
RJ44Pr 4iil 4T3rMhTT^T: II
<^:9^'^ gw^f: I
54Wf W44-=HII4$W4<: f^r nr C^ I

dWl^nhrr: : r7[4t]3r &
^^". ^flfcT PJOT # ?KZ\ II
^: TO ff^RT^: " I
TTc"-H*Uril+Hq*frw^ 4%^ 1 1 < 1 1
SITMH+: *: II
117
118
No. 49.
THE DHARMAPRAVRITTI BY NARAYANA.
**!:.
tfiFttrnr : II II
>> [5] ^ r { i
\^ ' \ ||
* " | HKWfl II ^ Il
^? njai- cfNt mi-ifr i
% f- Il 8 II
1 T % #cTrPr ?1 I
pwwih &f trinrffrf^"
#^^ : nww ^-:^^ a- 1
?# m < il
IIT#qT: Il
^ *[: wiwR^-W^lfaH I
*<.1|" dw^l trpT: II49 II
No. 61.
THE VIVDRNAVABHANGA.
Mt^TR : Il
rffc fw grgrÂf^f , : II \ Il
^fw^qrfr'q'^n !% ^ i
^^ MU^muft II II
ACQUIRED FOR QOVBRNMENT.
^PFTTR \ ft'ffW J4T fqr4TTII?4>sRRT4; Il

?" =n^JJR \\ fg^fer fTW: I
rRWr d^^MÎT^m? II
rTWT 4tull<R fTrf^T4WiiT: I
^PTCT%ûi4flfrfaR^4ui4
\ 3HRWRR^R^ I
4TRt-4' 1*11 I
^^' iPnftfaFT II
wrcf " ^'4<^ i
THMKHWli rr '*: II
7<<* ?
W^frrH4Rcr4T "tI4<IH+J4 I
aHl3^<{TlK-dH frffcj*^ Il
W$H\ ffbb <%^ I
cR*3H4ltf<??l4u^Hf f'f^R' II
ril4K4<H ?6\ % I
tftolR^fr ff: fCTfS*" frfaFTCT II
H^WM^WÎ
^^ fT^^TRtr^PiTr II
frftrcj t^w^ ^4R^tit i
44il*MHtfr4<mi4toV34H. 1 1
^fr^FTNfrc^rmTTR^q': I
HT?^ J t&f +! : Il
^fW^rattr 1 S^T: I
1&% \44 +11+|: qTC II
119
120
ftcTRTW^^- fir m: ^TJ II

^ : * ipT: Il
No. 71.
ATANDRACHANDRIKAM BY JAGANNTHA/
arf;-cjp+4*<ijr '.
arfo
%|uUlH : \
^[$'.% ^ %4ftf4
< |>1 <frrfa^ II \
+<r"4I^Tr|yTt1'+,rt41|3riTfrdj>^l^lôy^^R^nT[4'] ^TW:
K'ifiWfMAitffcitiflftui ^d.1*'a|"s^ra1i^HeK'iMdiir-rb'+iNeâJ+I^HHiUqi^H $$^ #IH 4<qH?Hf4R^4 & +'fHrgfsi ftj4 tfrfr rRrsito^j
# *T?tr " 4TT?ftirfetfr: *fl4t=fl4<ll"kl4fi"4ti'ul
TIRo 1 1 TfJWr: arffrîrfxftJ-JTT^^qt >?>71^: <N5fr 4W ^1%^: I

^ I
* MSS. *%^!| The correction is from a copy in the Boondi
Palace Library.
ACQUIRE FOB GOVERNMENT.
qTfro
\( xw <iu*n<t s^rpft ^r*nrg; I

dWKsINd g"<*^TT pi-mi: Il
tJo
*<'1^1^ ^TOEftj II > II

CFT frri: rt î+W^H^H " h4+: Il
"-^<<+ 1 +< II
121
No. 72.
KDAMBARPRADESAVIVRITTI BY SUKHKARA.
^tihOiîn^tI!-'.
ît^ML^J^f^TWL^: T]H I ffrf: g^W^ Il

No. 74.
A TIPPAN ON KDMBAR BY MAHDEVA.
J|UI4M4<M+1I R:tr I
1*%7 VTW fr^T ^ \ M
12>4*<-|# H ?^;4 \ fa<W*Hdll4 **318<^ I

^PT ^^ ^ ^^ Il
PnniRHffjnTtg^r^ ?"^ RiciMc-iiuHrft i
$><? *: : - II
gfjcftfcnng^nTf^ ^Mi*>y^re" tsp^ I
^' $ ^fr II
122
nmtt WKwfrcFfT Rf^TcTi ^ il

sTSTT^ft^l^F'lR'IIMi: il 3; Il
No. 83.
THE MUNDITAPRAHASANAM SIVAJYOTIRVID.
httWtwii
ifo^pPT < et t*+-H4l $ I
3ffTFIcTiRoT^- fa^facT^ *711% t\4\% qTJ 4ltf STiCt 11*11
tf ^f"; II
* 47 crg^rRra" 34 Rl=l*4lMR^d ^?^ *
4
4TJ eff: M: '- <? $1% 31% <* m I
5fd4gy*i I^T^Ficliicf^ rptfqfa: Il
No. 87.
THE LATAKAMELAKA BY KAVlRJA-tANKHADHARA.
sftiFtSTPT :
-^^ ^^^^; I
^: ^ <.
f^l: ?: RST ^^^: I
StFTf ^*$^[5]* *'1: Il II
fRTT ??1^ ^|?^^*^^ WZ^Thhni *1^1< il
55Tf47?3Tif: ? 4J R-^ ^: H ^ II
^: at II
5Rn%sWvTrifTr^ ^$ ;
No. 99.
KOSAKALPATARU BY VISVANTHA.
^THT^qW:f%*T4TT:.
^l^dN^H <<41= I
^\\ fqwt farq; i

414+^d- jr: 5IFT : II
<~^ ^ i
fpir?iP4W4;mm i
#?"-- ifRfpr 4wm
5nWfgRrg^r?47%T?F9"5":TRR^:IcT?"4W,f^lR f^FT^ I
;*5 <FJFT W Wll^dPri+ II

qfr|frWfP^TFjfr5ff ^ II
pftt 1\^ \ ; |
<; srt +^g;

^WM*H ^ ^^ it <\ I
^^-! JCTMRTTCT II $ Il ?3pTpt: Il
f<4MI*N<'><>!Mrf$ <=)|rtj
^^le^y^lu^^Tanîofiy^yHufj-: I
atf^R-: ^TMHfa^KdMH|^Wl4:
TTFR^rl'Tc^ HKN'^Ciq": Il ^ Il
ipffeftft!4tyiMPfci : fMtsfr mrr-
123
124
IXTRACTS FROM MANUSCRIPTS
?T4TFdJ|'44<y+ndl4l'iKfl|iFf"-
[]5" " *^ ^
WZ 3 ^ 4*t 17"|< ^^ ^ II Il
1 ^-i Fnrfr - ^ I
+l4H$l4Umi5l4 ^TRWKHcl^gdr^ I i *\ Il
ff4T3q- : y4iH4#lWT'. ,= ^ ^J I * AI <? I -. I
y<l44.*44 W i4T fcT. flMRTfi^fe ^4 II ^ Il
\ ^ %(\ ^<| i
*W1 S*^ Hjf" 4T3W" 4f\ ^= ?:nTR5 Il ^4 il
+NIKT: m^t#i^*i km-. Il y*\i 11
No. 100.
JNNAVIMALA'S COMMENTARY ON MAHESVARA'S
SABDABHEDAPRAKSA.
tt. 3-
^'iStirm =R: Il
3 *-<* *bfl*IMHiaf 3R
JT 4frPT 4414<1*leiy*i44lld4<* I
%*fa^ 41 |": T5T frWPm^TfWiftt ^ }" rWf^ SRq- cfirffq; Il \
T4>rAi4.^y-4M<iP4r $\ <*<{\ I
^<*,<3^11 Eh'^K \
M^KHîî-t ^1. ra4<-dHK<i5t^- 1
*R*n ^; ^FT^f^rc^^- Il \
125
f?4mrcPTniR f i 4< i r *i i 'gcrrefrnq; i
55?^# ^frfir ffrT 4^141*1 II Hfr: 5^"^ II
ttwr ffs+iki ftimfibr* ^ i

^ *$\'. Rftl
^ fw " R?^ cf=T iTFTTHÎAHir-
*5^| re fr'ftii^+iU^ ^^
^ ^1^>^<^< \foiPT '^^'^: ^1< ^
TW4 I
^ ^ Rfrrf cR4l*4*<|oHM+IRH
I^rsrnt ^ fft<pMJiiidld:
T* 5 : t^ <1=*14> =^1 Sf ^':
tcTT 4AII4>IUII< ^T^f^ fafefcRT 44t frfr*1 <~Kk) <McHd:
^ " RT^4^rîTîlt PTTT^Tf^rffb^ Mit- -MKKlftPd f2TcR4:
W %Twl4?=IHt] ipjNÎ+i"!^ Slh fW^
^ *JN>HHI*TPfT: ^Nd^ljAlltHfTRTt'r Mt4j *1^< "^[>] %ftrs?TT4T
]2C
EXTRACTS FROM MAN3CRIPT8
<\<\ 4*W 4*|e<4l fHT^PTT tfWT:
_o '4,\ ...
^ q^^fa ^
^"^151# ^?^%5?5'"1|3T5î?"4+l^ld1+l * II
No. 100 (continued).
JNNAVIMALA'S GURUPATTVALI.
^ ej^niciffltHf % ft
R:î% i" T4J =?: \ 1^ I
^%" < <k rt ^=&TR" ^^ WT r^îTltr f" T: \\\ II
14%^<"? ^* I
WJ4*ldH<M44l] 1<<1:
cT^t ^ Rtf: ^WRÎI^+tR-: I
Vl^R^RT: ^MHH^Ml II 3. Il
fettig ^^^^: Trh ^*!!: II
M 5FtT Ti" ^^|+^||: I
airen; fsrarfa: '^': II II
^^^^7: I
T?J?J3R4T: 15?1=11: I II
* fJi% ? ^dlrtt W jfF4R":

\^1^: ^^ II II
^
RJl4lftcMM4*HI: ^^^: I
ftJT4^Fr?farH^53 M^l^frfm^nT II II
* \* |'^?1^1,1?': I
JiW^WFT^r f 4Z$ Sft^FNTHfi': il ^
mi q-q- ^Rt #|#2% 1
fpraWJjt rfETfit RF4f:^*

rN^W<+J<lpRCPi^4<WI4l< Il U 'I
4Hi+^Mt44W4iRfaia4i i
tfricfefPHlT f*TRW f^ [f ] WR fat 31RW
^nTfim^f^Rf3fr rre*R irffrsTRm- \ il
^^^5? ST iTPTRc^^f^ I
MtcTr PR iRTtRCiTrîîr^rq; II \ il
ntiR i rt#?^ ^^W^4+l<ÎKN^rt|rt4,K^<^l: I
: <\ ff%: * It \ II
Sfa4M=(IK4RiT3Rr: ^^f^cTWim^r: Il \4 II
FT#4l5l|<'f'l'fr^Tr^rfI^KJR inFfr-
127
128
XTRACTS FBOM MANUSCRIPTS
MTJMIo4>k<HI gfafu^lR'UHKIT: Il \* Il
^W^cfift rr^^trt,JliqTT: I
UI^Hy<MK4HWKNull: II \
5)5 |f?T: *11^|>| tt& *1 I
"cfat fiJ^<5tf5fHMiH4l<4$%S": Il \^ Il
^Wd4f JIIdyifM^lhyHMdl I
R^Nrt4loW STtiJriRti^R: Il 0 H
fw 1\\<~1{*> f^rfrq- frfFT i

tm-. R^ nr#fcT CfffTfaTipr %^> \ il
ar^+^||^N4ldo4iJ44.|J(Hl<iKJim^T; II 3" II
^ fafamwrr^ yj <* < r * 1
5fWeT4TIFFnFT ^ fRrnffa " || ^ Il

%fiMi*^HjR ^^^ i
UriH^sHI+44l<U^ \ II II^ ^ fcT^ il

spPrffi g*Ri5% ^ RHiK^fdîS i
^^ S^^T^PPTfeRfr *
frTb ^^<=1^ I
d?Kj ?yrH7rf<^K^ ^ ^ ^: f^^M

ÂliklHHHq^^l'^H+i.H^bT^rrR: I
Mddlfa! WKI-JJWT ffr^TT Fffij; Il II

a^^TR ^1^|)+' *mfa: 51^: I
z&k ^wfa ^
ft ^^+1^1*5 4\4\ tfii II
129
No. 102.
TH SARASAMUCHCHAYA. A COMPILATION FROM
JAYANT AND OTHER COMMENTARIES ON
THE KVYAPRAKSA, BY RATNAKANTHA.
^'^5.
* 4 lf4<0Rci<94<Hl<Mr; '': II
l+l+: 4Ru|<4< fraepnr" !>]
fr" SWt " 44t 4 4cTJ 1
kiwi qra rf^ra-fr^^Rri^RT^

^; hsfN; nwcT ^ frteRfaq
2fai: *M4MIW FT FJ : 5TcTT: I
<f: gi4T^*4l^m"5pT: Il
raftcf ^ Srnr5T: Alfa ^ I
Ttt rsTcrcnifirji ^
Il
nfsrrffar tfai 4iH<ttRuir i
^fi^R FTRt^^RT fT^T II
^ ^ 41 44^44 $% 4\<4, 44rR434 #**>><11 ^ i'l- 4<1*1+ ^
^ ^" ^"lr^'lr if144 yH<j4-R ^ Wul~4Hf5nTi^rrfr c^W^ 44 &$* H4Hl5ifqfrT 5^1^
H4HKM<il< 3^ 4 ^^
W4 41 ~<4 4 &*44 II
^" ^ It )
444441: fT: f> TTff^ PW^HPf
srofqfcTftfcr 4%?K4 tP erf ft : \4>41<{\4<{\
&\\ && srw^r +i^r ^ -Png% tfc4+l*l4> 1 rf" fn > M *VfH J < f. ci I $)<%5"
f4MMHi<ti?ff^frrrff qt rt f ^ t % ^$ ^
% \*\ ! ^'^^^^^? wi & $ ^^
4wnq% , : ^; 4 i
130
4TH4Hjfi ?|?:: Il
4 r44<4ilR4il^4"l<MI4=ldK>!Jpr tpterrfc
No. 143.
THE KERALAPRASNA.
II %ffi|3|*IW : II
fa+- frF ^^% : Il \ II
5<14>? ff% fT^T flTSh I
*3T#f4 %{>] ^^: 11^11
No. 156.
THE TAJIK ATANTR ASARA BY SAMARASINHA,
WITH THE COMMENTARY BY NRYANA.
no * ft ifiiW ^^^ ^^':1 js" ^ i

51: \
tro rfo ^14^1<414>^^11^1:
111^|1^>?: %(^?!: I
fTFi^nr: T43RS" +^-
Hi4i44iuir*!tKriit' [ ^p 44|uhjA^PiR: 1%]

^^Tif^r [*] +41<411< Il
t rfo ^\^\^- ? II
131
fcf nyt*4HWHKi4ui*dH( %Ti4iHii*Ki [] .-
No. 162.
THE PADMALLVILSIN BY NRYANA.
4{Th*I<AlRift *<UI4*4":TRITT:.
^- -: 1 1
3T*!uii+<+idi4l ftmrr 4fa44 T II \ Il
<mit*i3t it * (*^ ^
&^ frt ; i
AKÂ4>ri|'<tS 7ff =^ 4 H
ffftujMtKHlWiit *5/ 1
TTfw Rt^ff 4fi|ri*4! 44*7 ^ H V II
41>4| .ji^JdH<IH*K I
jt dW^R ^^ 'i il
fcr %^|=)1-1' qicmRTR: \\
^^fadHKN^dqiJ^HlfW'ft'H"!: *)|[1; Il
No. 194.
THE VlTTAe BY MAHEVARA.
a
j-H^H^H, *.
?5 : Il
ia*MA*l4l+<lftHHlR^4lf4 *p4 II
Hl^d " o^^KW^ ^ frW ftt II \ ||
1'1<*|<+1<411--
132
EXTRACTS FROM MANUSCRIPT
4% fW" f^FranSIFW: II
fl% Mfat^TCf frRItl* II
No. 201.
KANDARPACHDMANI F VRABHADRA.
^" : I
Sf^ rf-: bf^T^TR3 II \ Il
twm f*t wrssfwnw -. I

iTttrrrt^ ifl44,-4HI: Il II
Ht '-! W ^ 4|41<4 ^ I
^r?T 41| 4*h*ii1 ?q ^qfcT h ^ il
4Wt 4 ? ^" Wsff 4Fi: l
arsfîffer wm\ 1WW-4T WIlWi II Il
qT^tî ^T < UlMll4l I
*-!|<-<ni*W W[:] psteq- II
fir^rq- ^?^: ar^rfcT *% c?: I
fir$$<toA^ffcr faScfonw^MII || |l
${% 4*<-4lV<HWKI: Il
m^y^T cnffaprr jfjctt stert
^ ^-: I
^m fronnRw'^fS" i
fl4c34*pm4*ra"C^3*Wfl Il \ Il
+mi<4irrmr ifri^Pt sra^mpR ^: i
^^^ arf^r '=14+> i
=(*1 TTq^TiffS^^f-: J^R-: Il ^ Il
cfp fwrgil sniracR il
Tfo
^wr" ^=)^1+1> whh fayr: I

3T|TcT ^cMlft fe llWI*H*l*Hfc>ll0l II a^ i
%fKI4^^H.<H^<sft^T4T^T I
^ %: hW&'llr: Il \i\ Il
rrRFrRTîririFTTTr^rRJ^ftl^r^ I
i OHHrt,M444dl4dH ^^ || y^ ||
^R?4fcTrrW ftuf0! II Hi II
|^d;^l?FT^5Fftf PRTTWFT I
5P r^R <# 5*^5: 4 il

rlHiil JTTfgt RT- WT*R3 II V Il
?xc*i^ff?Tr?H rrera rcrfrfgu # i

"FT^Hy^MdqR' " RT: FR^T |l ^ II
wftsrrrwr =^nTTaTq-: pn ^q: II

^||"|1 RT: ": I
No. 214.
THE CHIKITSKALIK BY TSATADEVA.
fl*rl*f*leffort.
4f* 4RTOT^m^ RT ^Tpr -* 1 I
fcTT Hi^l+H^rT %fafaT f&4 II \ Il
eKlritl!5^4TT^T^T^^|i|^N<+ll<NI41|^!: I
(^-^^|^^<<%|^<^11^[^<^- II 'I
133
134
^ *sA: flf$STH % II \ il
?; fore^ ^; i
No. 273.
VASNANDI'S CHRAVRITTI.
; TtertT tro gâwi^: tt ^

an
sftTPTPT 1 1
MtoJlri'tt ^ ftrcrtfiifasrp
4wt ^^^"- i
4"rflt gfflTf^T (<'^1: hlR'*"l'4T: 14&: TrilrTfcr^?' fftt: Il & Il
gTCW^d4K*IH*W<*4R4|ui J^guw^l^HtlWUcHKI
4Hiy^^NK4^NI<r4îlU4^Hi(-44.il<;AII^H|J|K^NHWq>4r -
^^^^^ ^-<;=11+=111&t 7^^^^?'^-^5114'=114^=1<|^( ^goTTf<iiuiw^4N+4l4Wi4HHW4>rtftMui4=iumNKNi-
3fHiA<Ml5: q?ricR ^^14.1^ <*

^ ^jj^fr^lfc & Il
cqr^rf?^ 5^3* ftiTiTRfr \ il
jott: ^- ?rfa ^ mft W^ ?5H: qfrprfr fW

|*1?^^ WET TtI^ cTSFFTTOIRti^ #TH: hR'/skI <*
135
T^ ^ ^^4>*11^|4>**<1^-
^ rtststhctr; i frer i mm 4 g?T i ?gwrîk=hh: qr^qf ir ^ fr # ^ **<<?1$|1

cTtrfi fest 3^4*1 '+ %=?1 ftrWi "% clt?Tt: q^r
44<rtHftdlWK t*|44<|+ilviiRP)n4"dl< *d)4\
qT^|%?r gt^ fti^rr^" ^^" H$M+|e||faf ^
4<'UIN$14I< I ^" I ^^ ÎÎWIR 1 1 ^ tf^W -^*'!^: il ! ^^^ ti $114,3 HW4d: I J^TR; |?^|4.=1^?fcT^fcT ^ ^ tf fPTRT ^ ffxf: : I ^^44>l*H4fi*H4Kuldyr^Wf^3'T3^ ^^ 4TW44d:
4?^ 4TFT T ^^ sfttf 4TW4: I ^' 4fk cT: TW^W 411^^)|^1IJcRT : 5^4RranAcT ^^? qtSR fcT:
Jjsrj&rj f?5"5TRRr 4l4uirf7 c^gnRw^qrH'HH \ 43
3^-rnt f? q%5R *T 4W3nri^4MJ|4H I cTFT ^14>|*^5T^T^ 4trt i]MiuIW^4MJ|4H IRT5R ZRT^R % ^
^ ^? "^|<^|< i rffa ^ 5.rt4iu||i < < ^5#? I 4<44r

3T?Tf JyMJJu|y-4dHI4-4 f^PTR; fNiJÎH -
qrjAj4o=j^|t ^ q^r AM*|iUl I
\ ^
<
T [^]^ 4Pff[lT]ifti ^^T^rfR I
^^" * fC WS-dl rfc ^
136
^ * 1 ^fftw. ftrfr ># H4-4M il ^!
îHd<^4,^<4,R^5^^3^w^'ii,^îid'4j^jrH4i#J-jrd,i:
rrf^TqTFr^- ^^KIUsrfTT ^ = f^fc:
ftrfrPr^q-t î*fdHdaH4^y^4^Frferr
5?"#511: ^ II
ffrT: ^^: '+^11": ^WTRT^ffrT^^*5 4<4NH4d: ^: I
^' N<d<4=)HT < *
^^ iKAMW: Il & II
fTM ^: fi^mW Hll
ftlfeMIS: Il
\ 4f?l=fl<* fW ?- ^ II
TFT 5fRiqt [ ^ II \ Il
+dMI-T SRI l >\ I
5Fc7ifr #
^^^ jiuhh+i: m
% NH-ci Ml: *: *<: Il ^ Il
# ^+^+^5! ^: II
g% ^"1" \ g?rat
^d^+Ml^d^W ^: I
woamkw rf%^rg>=iriTT^f^ ft
,^!^'4| "^: g*3#T3 II Il
55*?[ pirefRfftr; Il * Il
fkzfc cRTiftq^TT sfrTcft rfRtjt II

4 TTRT ^"^ <5 g pifa 1 1 ^T: Il Il
^PiRl <? ^<|<+ II

4t 44twfct\\fk I fcT II ^ Il
^ ?M ^^fa ^PTR 5?sRJR: Il
1!1|1* 5 ifNrr ^ II \ Il
arsr ^^^frrfffa^srf II
SRInrreTW i^J: TRHîT II W "
: ^R^ClfclHM: Il
<*1*1'1''|4: Il \ '
MtH 5pT |&<^ Il
4V4?t 3$14f\ uH^f : Il \^ Il
^^": 3pP3": ?Tc3T: Il
fcrftH-WMlfa: ^^^: Il \4 II
d<W4bR4IH4|c) ^^^ I
* Ufi+H 4 Jfe tii II \MI
WlKl^c|(fH^H^H*l *<4<1: I
^fiTim^' smfaw^T raRTRRi: il

^H*l4>IK4d^lKMW'^Nf^r?W: I
$*": %flfa-Hii snTRftr Fc : Il \$, Il
*111*11 ^^M^K+: I
5W&4Prnrfr ^fTTTJuilHdl: Il \ Il
MHKl^l" : II V II 3"t II
^^"ANdiqTff sTSrîft Wnwft: Il
^ RTWSWT: II \^ II
u^JjuTl4tr WW: Il
!<*=: ^^^ H \^ Il
<*?14>** ^-^: Il 0 H
4HM4lWHMuulkdauM<?l4<l ?: I
J'HIKii'cr: *1<<1<: Il 1 H
137
138
$""ct fsT-HiW fltrfiFa ?<4 II H

*# 4U<fc\fc\ ^: Il
T \: ^ ^: II \
^5: ==: II
cRJ^faTT: 43^f ^ II \ II
gf %%^ 1<*1<: 1 1
': <\\\ **: II '
cTS^f^R^^) $rfafa% Il
\: XWWP : TFR^fH: Il " H
5: ^1<^11^$: Il
% Rr q4rgld4H4>: Il ^ M
rm stf ?% ^
s^Tprcmt zft ? v
m*h t4ft >}?? trfttor II
THTCT %4 Tcft 4T II ^ Il
$ \ * qrftfr
t\H ^T sft^f ftrT Rftft Tcft 1 1 ^ II
-. flfa '-: S'frffcFWr: Il
*FqfcT: ^ ^: fipfr^T: II \
|# ^tT S": %" II "
correr fcm fsr air '^ ^

^?^: tff rig^l^^ ^srfhT4Flff II
^^^ $1?*: \\ \ II
^5W Tc ^"^l: Mft^fRr-i 1 1
*1 $\: mffiZ II V<
Tft "cmrWOPW '^ II
tfMl^t Wf iTIsrMMPHi+lRun II Il
^ffaPl.fcH^*!: *5?: Il 3* Il
Hr rfrr ^TFT^ 1 1
rT*TT: 3^t% fall<?l T?TT4T: : Il

H<H\HW <\(< q-: Il ^ II
"^WcfmRrr 31 WTIWT: II
"3 4 "J5(IK4^4 1?^^"[^: Il II
?^ ^^^\ Trfr II
HWIH^HT cRJ: ^ 3RJT%tr II \ Il
*1 TT ^tFnftfr : I
kfWft +ri|llU: +rtNd^l4T: Il ^ Il
^: Il
3TTHFW WFfr tfMfa++rt|c>4l M \ ||
cWf ^ ^% y^WNI^Nl II
s^jfRr 4iifr ^% fi" tr a

dHl-ikd &m\ ^: : I
^^ TM r J:^fTlM II 4 II
&& WHsTT^ ^ Wt II
^ 71% IT ?R ^fT f^rt II Vi II
cWJ^PT: fr% T%% T^ ^ Il
JN4ril4<: *"*5: Il 9* Il
RrOilRrf ^??Rwr jwr^: I
^^f^l cTFT <=HMH94 km-. Il 4 Il
<": ^5 3NI<!*4W ^ : Il
^^^^ ^ %?^; Il ^ Il
^te4H$l<4) w$ 5^ffar # il
Mw^TTmHP^r ^qPTFTRF^r^ Il 40 H
^sfltoTiTW | Il
rrgift^lRM: TW: mîJlfcfaW II 4\ Il
SRTR re-^" ^T%: I
^1|||<?4.: Il II II
^^4^? II
hiRrii-cfi ^ TSTgRF ^ ffarar
44ik+^<m<OPt PHHltfy, II
139
140
ffW%flKlSil<s4ldU||ft4<itfcfr II 4M I
"1<1 ^ =)t^l4+<u||< II , Il
3"R <1^|<4>%: || V9 II
3* ^ q^r tffaTfa 4*4": 1 II V II
^ p$4JRmI fHKKHI^ WftlflH I
%%- >? \ Mhtt ^ II ^ II

% ? 5TR7H ># " " ^ *Pp%
^^^^^^ 4ljwj-sM II
$ $\* ^^ fa3
41**1|41 $ i*HiR ilR$l4ldl fffl -1)<: Il \ Il
qr^: y-dpiii'HHrfl ^ 3sHr$ II
5#j 5RT: 3^ ^+13<^+?^+: Il

"^=iNHKHrl4|c#q- f $\\\ Il U
*?*-!^<; ^
:||| îVlMfy^Wlfl^fgm": Il
4oî4|<,y^H|yd<u|ÎK^|^W"l:
ffWif-Hsrsw < <i\f^t ^ y

5TTW 3TW TTIWSfT: ^'^ Wl^fl II
m u4-4-=i&uih .îw dwiwvMl rpjflt $
^ 5TTW ? <\4,\ iwdyfc qnt il $ n
%5*: fr^l*4JKd4'K<Jd^l^: Il
HMd, AllW|d<AH - fr: Il $*\\
141
cTT $ 4\*U44<\: 5\'<\% II ^ II

? tf^PftJIHiH ^ fi<fadl [\:
1911
No. 266.
THE CHRITRASRA BY CHMUNDARJA.
tJiK'IHR:
NKtM-KltH-HWH *||? |
cRfT^rRnT^ryPTÎ^Kill^N = NWItbH, I
<?<*%^ ^ rqrfwr: Il
+^|-4*'!!'^^+:^1'<"^'^^3^^>^1^1^^^%% >#STc ^RTrir^TR:: *:
No. 270.
DHARMA SARMBHYUDAYA KVYAM,
BY HARICHANDRA.
II *: $&: Il
^^:^ 1^4 J| d^T: II \ II
t^tf crft Rftiwi H-4jrtif4i4rra; '
JT^TR^T FTf g5$gfsrirfl4l: I
if C^fFFT5t q^fJR3 4: W4 : Il ^ Il
: W $1 11 : ltST: I
-4>1 <H<l**lriHJl ^" II II
iT?T%|?TlT5gsrrflt %51 II <\ Il
142
3RT: FT^%ft dMlfa $% 57* II $. II

4FT ^R^TTfP^TiftBT: Il Il
> srwsnTR": TRf^T ,1^+ I
4Tr?imr?VKH<l4t *TF: fet TFTcT iTRcft c II Il
tfrj^M*4KS % rf^rcr *r% ^ ^
cTO-TFT^WT sr^fFTf^ RfcrRfl" R^rr^W I
^^> \ Fft \ II
fTJFTWcPRSfrrr c^T4lHq^RriT I
^ iffprr WT 3T^f t-^^ Il \\ Il
4<W4KluW*ii4IWFr |4^ I
t^fr Rrpn#TfrfHW4^CR4Fiq" irTM^tr-: Il ^ ||
rj <p: TRM^ 3RW ^^ fTffcj4=ldll4 II U
^ ^ ^{^ I
rlrNrfÂiTTRq' * FWif ^ II \ II
^^^ fR^gnfq- ?4 ' q-%r?r i
frf c?NH=fri4Tfqr gifsr^frei^bq-: II \
TPft 4^wf 3"^: *1*4 I
4<l<4>: : 4 f?: Il \* Il
<f*$w 4T\4jm\ 4.\ % -, i
*F4 *dlW*)44>IK4t qpT^feSTTîTr: Il \^ Il
% < -^" '^^ f4: Il ^

[* 3i^<ln+KN ^": I
^^ ^1 <KW FFTTRJ : Il ^\ Il
H( R4P W 4"*MffT 1<1 ( I
143
" grWtfr f%4T *: ?5t \^ Il I

ii^gr^T y^w î^ciufdw " it nrfa: I
ar^N" t^ < "îjf" 4": Il ^ Il
cf^r %'% ^ 4ii4wr3rarr \
5T54 ^^ W ft^q fiTR- ^ ^ I
jnffr WTRTRFRT^Rrst <? ": Il II
^Jlf tmt: #nifr Rrffa^ I
: $1^1 : rRTTcr:T3% ^R4"=3; I
tNHAina-'gqS" J^T qi 4^^>l:i3tf: Il 49
5? T^^l^t w& swr i
> dWHH^ ? Plt : ^ || ^ Il
RHHffft 5 ^: T4Tef5iT5r?R4: ^
*f^rf*NH44Riiy<tfq' iit : ^5 ^ II 40
^* fJTTSRT : {\ fr^RT ^
stwfa 51<1: f^ ": qTF3T^rRil%ci: |
q fT^ P3Tfa ^^ iMcK'WrgTfR' cRft II II
= *}=WMd<#ull : *? Pw- q^rfTWT^ II II
tM ^: * *^ ^ && " t 5^^ I

^^11++|| g*aJwj<wi<?<uiiflft>Ti^ il 4
StfhT T fcflftl$4fT ^fT: ^ II 4 II
irg%f^ram-fT54Tm !^ +hHi: *. M
^4 4H 4 1* 4 14^ 3<^<*=1": Il
cffr cTl% P|J|<ri<W?l54Wlilloil|| T: Il Vs U
n<d*)i1<j ^ '- M v
144
EXTRACTS FKOM MANUSCRIPT
^nfj fsrf^r II ^
^nfiR^-q^rtidir^ wz r-wwt ^ 1 il
^ -^ ff j!%4 *& II II
^^^ ^-^^^ Il II
^mFfcjwsi*?wi<-fl-4 tgrirfr" i
4TiHrfi^fad*lir<W*T ?f4% iRTR^rf II &\ II
frTFf ' ^: ^: 4&= #" I
3-r33f(t: fe* RRfir: " ^ ^ II S. I
<ir'-||f^4il^mdW^M|r2f:e'?trftf ffFRR I
4bt 'fis- q-% frni^5?T^wir4jrt^ i y^
3H: 4M4l4TTfPT5%: fcnfTTStf^FTf^r: I
^<1^? FHHMr Cf # %: Il " Il
% 4 f N FR^FrfRr cK4W^ I
F^-*Tff% ^^^^ 3? **1" Il 1^ Il
^^^MqH+ÎH^^Spf^^^^^nt I
4%4W4 : tfrt^^Mw^PRffr II 4 II
OTFFq?pft ^^^^-! P^r I
4^WIW^^t^ /^*?" Il \ Il
! $ flTWTi?T4ra"rr Wft I
innrer wTFnwiT^FRT^f ^""^ il ^

*R"1r4 siriftWR TFT frw RfR" Il II
JTFT Rj4^4jhpj fwiRui ^^^ Il
ACQUIRED FOR GOVERNMENT,
145
i<lfcU|c |: 7[%^ *RPT II \<\ Il

ift *&**( Il
^ 5RT: TiTTriTrF: %% * ^^^: I
&\ gif ?rrq- ^ ^r" ?1%^# 4* II

iMTfcmfc : ^ tto I
raif ir#epiiiffor!T ^-$ $ il 4
( 4 ^t?Tîf<q-: tTPTf^^r: i?M arsf Il 4^ Il
fff ^wm%T5444" ^: Il i.o Ij
^^' TTT 4 c: I
% \ 444-. \?\% & <\

fW44 444tf [^$\; I
: ^ffTTT^ 44W>4 4tf I
fH^: ffST \\ %%: Il <^ Il
Uli !^^ #??1 I
fTSTIT ^ fr^^WT-raTSfiT $ IK Il
ffTrÎT q<ft faPT 73 1PT 5 I
# grf =nTr5Rnrr^R%r^ 1 II
< ta 1\% \ i
tffl ^#|^^1 $ $A
Tl%Kf liter $% ^ : II i.'-9 II
frFTrT ^PRf47T4m*4M4Rr: facJWPT: Il ^ Il
<, ^ ^ II ^ II
^rw^g^gftffPT- i^Pidi-fN i
3r-4i*IHlH'H^4 ^RHllt|44^rR 1-90
146
EXTRACTS PROM MANUSCRIPT
flfSMfcHlVMlfe^ fcTFN" rff % \l*\ (I

4$ ddWIH ??<# j^gqicT ^ ^: Il ^ (I
m*X: 1?: fd^d "Û4 1^41%^ Il ^ li
aHdiUlrtlH? : tfa #^ cfo: Il * (I
ft qft *Pf m^sT : ^: i

: ifRi^ %t^Tgt 4>d4 ^ II * il
'+'^: ^ ^tW^: I
| b-qRfcTRriRig^TFt fiiSRET II (I
r5^f%RKFT+K>| ^7%5 I
^^Ô^HdHÎÎ'J^ ^ M II Il
^ Rf: 51% W gref^ * Il

5^^ cttr# pi = ^ ?1+<^!1- iifr Il ^ Il
Tiff aW^dlH^dflW^^rcnrrSTRWdiil+Rt I
^fWf $WF* ^fed^Hli^ f^rT Wsft: Il o n
irrrnr RffgrT *^ ^j * I
tfTT qwwj R^TT: s^Ti4tfNftr?F5ifNff II \ Il
ÎW^MH?nfi3 3TTW3c^W^rf%% ^: I
lfTc ^ ^ *pwtT TTM^Nqr fcWrT II H
3TTq-f^f-J5^|;5^t3T ^T5T5TI% ^ I
qfrWPr^r^Tir ^to?%f^: RT Il 4 II
4l^^lAIH5ITW4fn)4MNd?r^T?" I
iwt "^ <" I

^- ^ <Hlfa<3HM3>f I^T: Il \ H
^^': qrr^^cfîqrc-w rn*wi% Il K il
147
'=1 * ^- Il
qfÎ^fcRlr: ff 4t 4l+rfN>: Il 4 Il
# \^ # fsrcrcft
^^ ? 4TRT Tcfts4TT.' Il
*nW4\ ^ $-<$-<J|1Rh: I
HltibsîibTPRT tRRf^Tmrfinr: Il
No. 274.
FROM THE FIRST SVSA OF THE YASASTILAKAKVYAM BY SOMADEVA.
ae
II &? w. :
* 3>=-1-<1|14: I
^: T^W^TFra^fe^f II \ Il
fM- RT5RT f: 'sftiTPT^ y*<^HK4 I
^%1^^1 %: 4> II II
r^nT^TFT ?: 4PT 4tMd|c| %# |

"VbwHiteK a^+ftî*^ II ^ I
jjwlfcuyHîR J41T =nre# 1
H4:rd^4)4Mdrt|%r5T: II 8 II
Ilrfl*!ull4 4W --rf 1
14&
EXTRACTS FROH MANUSCRIPT
<4< "^: I
^%|?^^1^^ II * II
: $4: ^*- II II
*$: ^^; i
\ II ^ II
fr^r II
: $ &
<^^\\:
Qtirff tMWK^ ^1 II \
^3^^5 5=># Tr% -d^ T fopw: Il U H
frfi: < N ^T^RFT^M i if, fi q apff^ ^ |
pTT fcff : 3#fTi: 51^|< - ^^: I
^ #; T T F4"^fTC3 " ^ II \
3WelW*HKl 1 r^RTTTR^" I
TtT: 4>MW< * ^ II \
^. ^: ^rTTNHlNdl: I
^: FrfiWcTRiPT F7R itj II \ II
51 HlW^FrWTl$l=qfc? ^: I
^?frim5T $%: gpH ^: Il \* Il

] <T ,iyHWH--W4fW: i
?5RfcnirfR W^Ti 1 5Ri ? Il \f H
- SNflFP-T 44 T 4 AW I
ACQUIRED FOR CIOVERNMEKT.
* rfrt ^5T -*1>4> II ^ Il

\ fT%": WT^cil^+Ki: iPRRin: I
*#: lid^Hr S? - II
^|<* kW pfrT $HT IR: II 41
<ri5RR R^TTR 4R irrrsRR I
JTIFTRf RPT T^ ^tort ^ II I'
q+H+^rgt^^tfTfaf^sn^RT i
Tf i## = Tcrf 5tcT W" l
f%g- ^^-^? fnrr: Il 4 il
tfifrtciPfr 5TR"<^r: Wtjpti II 44 If
c <TT ^r^TîRT r: ^: I
4T3TR4HMK |4< Wrqf cR: Il ^ H
R%$*R rRT: *?4"N 1*9-4 if I
fR ifcR f%3 ST iRFR%i II ^ Il
^1^gfrirsfalr ^Rrg^fr ^ I
: f% 4 f^ sq^tiW *)* Il V II
1 JFP #: RNfl^r: I
^n^RR^TR- 4WT 3ff ^ f% Il H^
fsrr ?gr: =: mt Hft^ft 4t^ I
^qr^frR: : P^^rTR ^fft II V
": ^1"45^|1': I
4%: TiM ^ fS *%: \\\\ II
afJRT^ fiRW": ^ I
^ >^ IT WST ^% 3R:
+i*uii<4 $-- $&1\: qj: .

wr-mt %? gt-: 4 $ZX I
^: << ^ II \ II
:? qrr^W 4R41WT itt^ I
# ^HWI*^1 il44iil^ Il II
149
150
' < ft" #Tr: (#r: tfgTtfJ: I

JWPrFRW FPT T f%FT II II
^ |4Rt ^ ^^: Il ^ Il
3%^" <%1 dî|ufl*4!|4lc| I
#$ *# ^ ^ Wh II V
4Nr -* : "^ ^^1 II ^ Il
^ H4WW Rr^TlllftraTO4T: I
jfrr im-, irir^cn afacrcpsR
*$ R-q-q-q^ % IN ^1+^^" f^Tg4^4 || \ II
No. 274 (continued).
THE FIRST KALPA OF THE UPSAKDHYYANANAM IN SOMADEVA'S YASASTILAKAM.
Il ftqpT^Fft $fr: gs-dNfftacp I
S4T cTTRPT W swft: $ II
^ g^r mpr: I
^ ^ II
f^TRI ffW^t: WN\ W% ifprWr I
arrcfft tiN<l4#l 5+4.: N
*|% 15 4T?"sTd<,irforf,MiH>yH*44V<4;îrtîrfi4HTHîHiflarii+rtlH l ytfctfc>^#rc*H^juiifldiHcii-
^ 1 ^^^^ 1 4%sft*in*tqnftw\ & i r%f^rf^^RfffsfMRrfrrRr I

?<5^<|^ i ^^^^^fRT <^<5^^^^1^^^1^^1^^'^>
SRKTC^T ^ JITcT: ^ ^ 'qffwjf df dl^mf^^4Tr44rat<T];S5 4T4 #5T: I
d^M4Hfadc^4,fadl4ufl44l*N*u) ^^dKW+HMdi'HIcr^^5"d Pi I I^T^WI^tfm^qtet <^NdN("IH<dN*ifaT
151
ft+^dUhhcHHWdci) I H'tf^l*4H^|#l4^4^|M4|aRc&naRT-
f5frcryrTh'^*<N'll:
+lHcll*flci4d<^îTPrmTrWRraTf?cT-
=)<^-|*='% i :i^4^4^tr^rfîii4^nilqr?ft-
^^ûm^kuiHdl^lld^ffHWqW^: 1ciT4-M*iNR<f^cTrwi^M rtctptrct wTf^ qRfa rt^t %hrft
ff^fr^t ^^; il
umz i rV /rwj; g3r: ^R4 r ^ ttmw ir fT lPSTT

tpt: *J ^JR^RTiT I I
stzff 1^ ^33 I
^?H$R4M=I(< siU-^ct II
^ffttlhJcl^l^'i^W^rfi'HflN^ li
TJM 5-1||< IR: I
W&m |5 414% *C: ffftfR: 1 1
152
EXTRACTS FKOM MANUSCRIPTS
?/: % 4%W(: Il '
# ^^?[ 5TH4"RTR# |$=1|: I foWi*^& ) <11*|1*<11?^1*1
flW=T5T5T: e^Tq"i4ff^l Mi.lf^r: CTRTCnTFJgcrRH'T: ^^TJ^^: fT CRM^<4Kiq^fcfT I 4"fRT3^RlR^4%:

iTcHW : Il
fTflRT Sfo-flW I tfnrqf&rFT q-Tfr%q-^ cfiT: 4<Î+HT4T?1?%# TWiyf % Cl% CT4=lf44W4IW+ITWW4""

4lt*4^l: I 4<4H^<^HÂIK4^^rr^rf4RRirKT%^TrT: I %<1WH4*cte \<4 I ^ ^cTT^Tft ?f 4Wt?rr: 4+lRM^*-4d*MMH|: ^l+4N4"i: I
3TC: SrfrrpqWTniH: '^-^ I

3% rfir jwt = ^wrf%4r II
^WN-dHTTc*F?r iPiFn: II
<TJtF II
Os.
tf4 WH|r^R#r. ^SSPTT^^TWfi" II

R4r ^ îfitl^T *faWH I
sftfFP RfrWgW: ITRTqT^l^rqTi II
|fC4"%e4iK<KI%^R"#l4il4NM<| - tf^wtf g%fm riwr: Il W WN4> 4l+Umi4.liT^ "^%5|: 4Tft ffi" sTSTf ffr sTSTKÎKH: II
4R: fafcT $7 "1*$1*1 I
f^WTCFr^S \\\ faT: I

ifrgfar^rc c^r <-1^<< i
*|<(41: TO4H1W = ^ II
I
* ^qtf?Rf $: fHq- I
SS&ÂIMH 5 f+iitf I'
^^^": I
f#T 1 if =PT [3R :] flf#cT ftfr: Il
tfsrrauilcuiî ^ ?["]>: I
% f^t 5 m tfNftP
sîTfi^r^rf {$1: I
<114.| <* : Il
str^t rann r qf ^ l
fRt-^T? fr w q^rofff": Il
sfH ) 4f Orf] R:^ 4ff&j I
^t 51]" cir4<+i<u] ii
TW^r I
4l=H4*ir W- ^: II
:^: i
+^11 gj- ^1! 4%^ II
aF^Th'-RlH^ '^^: II
fif%4 r rnif : ^ i
*# % ^ j I
<!% II
153
154
EXTRACTS MANUSCRIPTS
4fa ^ |<<1 [>]% tcTFH II

if WT: ^ iTPIJWR^T^" II
RfMw^lil |^41*^: I
^1^: $: : Il
* ** wfTt : f: I
<|1^11":
\4\\\( \% % &W4 i
HfvJMH-M^HIriiT ?T3T RW: I
f% i <|1': ^ gw ^ WWTT I
" ?1*1?*<1?": 3*4 MN 4T- I
W44M!c flîf ^11% I
^N^lTiHR" %4 I
I fer: ( : [1^0 I
fO" ^ ; tM^H : I
<$\: ^ 4< \
il
, 4f p 4 i
^HlK + = 1\ I
<TCT 11|: Wifct 1"< I

tori er ^ff^- u
XCQIRED FOR GOVKRNHKNT.
155
rTCTfcT^r 4W ^ Sfff: I
wtt wifawi'i ^ I
Wdl+IAfi^HI+l^ tt <$[\ II
ajTirrTll
^ CT? f?" St St sRT^T: I
WfarqT " f^nt %^1 <TTJW 11

: ^RRTW 4%f?J% 5ft: I
4 ^ 5" ^^^^ Il
I
3TRfT STF^f - |
* T ": qWfa: Il
îtfrctfig^rsfrb ^^ I
FPTI ^ f2T 5^" cTSTRR: 11
^TPr^T cTTnit ^ I
^jf^^wr ^ i*ld>i ^ g- il cgqw+iornft

^T^raTRftTgfRtM : 9T: Il IF II
No. 274 (coniinwecZ).
THE END OF SOMADEVA'S YASASTILAKAM.
r^TlWW ^T T^qftpT: ': I

cRqT-^PTT:f^%fN 4=1^ 1^1^ ^ H I R HT
fFIvf?" *2=1 ^ i^r ": Il

Erara [ rlrfc- jf^mTW^rT
.1< II
iR4RTif^frr[ rt'J^Hw [ 4\fk ]-
156
*1+^+1<^4<+1 *f4<M:
Il \ Il
>^1< WRFRrnft [^"] ^ \$1\4$-: Wd^m"!: [tx] ^-. ^ m T+ridlUriH^Wl: JMtR'vfR47rW: EPfqW-
IJT 0<1 ^^^ % g: ||

No. 275.
THE TATTVRTHAVRTIKAM.
5" W : I I gftfqHîflt : Il
Î^HlMM^HIÂoîH^^ : |
^^: %WT9M4I"H:I 4fa TWf <"-
TT 55nrSrr%frTsr7?r%5TTT %^^1^1 fr%?fl-[>]3T

l+^l <|11*141 ^W=^4Hl> ?Rr4T4#%cr
dWl^ltfttfT qfPTharrW ?
^cf ftf^ afrpqtW wrmi i ^^^
<?
3IRIT: nrf# 9H T4T# ~4I^W5lHl1^4+4T 4>| % ^'^ ^ H4i+5 ^
157
*t5F*
1 fl^T7?T#rt ^
iTJntfrp": T^rrert % 3d$*AII 3W acTff ?5i afcfr^T

cre4Wl<Ml4l%W: f^Tcf ^ I
^-"
3T3=r1>ff44ltbl: ^)<11+1:
ffgr?R- fRTWi I
4MKfHt : I AII+Û4riafttl-4g^4K|Ju|+4IW^H<^^rt|(tMI<<HU|^r^K+WHl*i^4''NI<IHI45<lPli<iSH -
vgwm f=ir fnf ^?: qirr qw rw*ft44NI<4WHIW4tl<- I sfRfft I *111<{ 3^**" I

1|<1 I ffSfpi- 1 +ÎUHW i imrprp i MiftAini
55
158
S(l<lcfl4Nl4^<iNl|!4îy'^44Rr5rH. I
^^5^^+^^1^4^1^1^ + ** 3TFRT*+ ff^T ^^^: I ^^F^T: Il

??" \ I
1& ^ |">%*11
5 cRT55Hliri+ÎÎWifr ifpjwrRT:
^^+ <ê=HqTd=HcH4: I
^^TcTf^f^fi 1 : *$<. Il
No. 277.
KUNDAKUNDCHRYA'S SHATPHUDA, OR
SHTPRBHRITAM, WITH THE COMMENTARY
OF SR-SRUTASGARASURI.
.^^ : JTfTJ^c II \ Il
î^4f^K+4ii4<4î^JTi!lrw5ui4iK+PlTi4^rg;^riTRT: I 'sfrJTS^PT^rjwr: I ^1^^1^<^1^*^?^: II 7^<+<1^^^^? t%: ^H)NN<r|^[iTcr ]5^: W<J*HPicfWI<Tr <14*^^^^^^: II 4krKHW ="114: ^ II
* ><=* \
<> ^rcr \
^r:|
T3T ?4H*-4 ("^^41$^^|7
159
^ ^rrfeifr tft i
jpf %* %%t4 & RTTT^ ^^"%<'1<*11|
T5^fi^rTgerTFI7 44mt: f^r >T?cfllc^f5q II

1 fa"i=H"f frcm i
<T * tf*t iu||ut 4 4K^l II il
. i fwr 4mm*i<mam<j. ? tpfar ? i <r?3TfrRTST tR^WT: Il nrftf" cft^ti<4<4ar^<4AlirfiT<4" CST I 3^TRF: : I %1: I f^FSTF Jmq<fe|sPIHi'WK'H 4<>4<N<.^4.T+luli ft * ^ I " *# 35*' a^
^t ftapspfr a|H*lijf II <"1^7| &$\ *: Wlftf = % . II " arsrRIRTRfi- ^

1 II ft*4Tpt ^?*^=| + : I ^ <iHH:
sit ^rg; i rfr4<4<4^=4M^t ; # i = îkhi <rr% frrwt

=T '' I fPTTfFq-: \& t tt I <ftf%<4<4?l: f ^ "JST# 4,51414 : I q4*F5Tc* f^T g% =1 ?% cRTTW II
II 4rfTT: f^fcT f? 5? t ffCFT *i4"
^TW- % ff =~4l^-dM-d^|: I
rnam <chm+-=ki: : Rrt^rrfr n

5 - rtc7 M i t^t sM ?
*111 ^^ wfT ^r i
^- q^npii i 4flrtul qmf i
*1? ^: I $1 1 : $ 1fT 4lfm I
4kl<H<H ffT3" "^T^RH" : I J 4l44l"ll<+ fc* frs?n rw ^ tt^ ^ <t (?*) \ qfr
ff^rgffq^ RT ÎÂ^H^H PlftFlN: I fR4 ^ +<I4
160
fqfHffajf : I 1
il
<&iuwi ^ <i<HuHw ^ ! i
fnsrfr :*1 II
4lftcT ftftu CTJJ<4HI<4ddW ^WR^r^Ffr #f 44^ RT
- I 5^^^^"5^51^1>' &: I
^ = ^ I yKHI<4ddl = fi^jfrl 4f =T4iy=M I
^; I HKiK'ttîKf^ -rf wt ?"11^111^^=(|1^ <<^1*$ =^# I anfer^4f%4

ô
(mui4uuh A<+ww <**] -r
3 4Z% g11!? 4NT fflSPT ^" IK II

tr^"fûIMuul-rl ^H^ji^l 44iR"l fclWH ^sl=fld<m4fHd *ilWW ?
qflfT ^ 4R <11<* 4T4_dHK*l< STTW ^
*^ tr <: gir i : ^ 3ffc: &

f3T3î?rf ST4^fR". T*ll^l+5W * 4ain*TST ^
* <cT45TW ?N% 4RT ra 4 tfM l 1" ffo ^
5*4%
WMd^NH'qt
^53
|-=11
4<4MH<gifl4
this* IK II
4jf <JuHN44k*H-) wt? i
^' gPrf4^n^rtf i
T MfaR ^<1 HsWdUHtfWicl: Il \ Il
fcqi-k^lM fcPRT: *^1< F

sff ^d^HH " fWWlfWtiR^ II II
sbfl4ri^4uio0^'cHi<i^k4i-gPdifnn rg- ^ I
/ &^* faifi ^^ \\\\l
161
cT4frfRI . *4faW^4+l^<yMK44K^^4^ tf^TW4fi4i|4fiu| <|| r^T^Tt^r rftWIHI "": qftffc: *":
No. 278.
THE SAMAYASRAPRBHRTTAM WITH
THE COMMENTARY BY AMRITACHANDRASURI.
to 3flo
i : ^ ^+1 II
: ^ ^** I
^ 4TPT *< II

[ ^ fTOW?FTO t i
ft^jro crwrrgsmror ^?wFiir \
5*1=(4)*1
WI*l<$Uld*H<44lrt
if ^: ?^-: I
5TRsHN44U4*<ftTO3t [: 3*% ffftftiT f <TS: Il
(^rf^rrqf^HN^lfti H *IAId :
"^ 4+ Kl ^: I
162
*1- [ ftr ] Ri^r

5T^TRWiT^f^ [tcT:J I
fir ^^^^^^-f$fc4: : Il
fa*ii<îTt)yi<}|iH44i<4i
-<^< fact jtctrit il
*fa<ii*KM* CT^pT cTrt I
4t<titid44> Alforjar ^ 1 1
S% ^ qfof: tKI^+dl-
rfr y^HHWt^p'Ur II
4>4NhWUcT: H4Hd*lfctT*kdl
%?1^: prfrT 5pdi4|*<T: f
W5nR*njTcT: Cjr|% Pîl*Hd:
WR^fTTFR f*N<ldl(Of<n Il
:<4H=HdPwq" qK)r4W4tl
<JKd4?dîlddÂdl55^^ rVH'jtf ft:cpp5TFPTtf Il
183
^^ Wi<l^ facT"
rnfi^ftnt" int f feT^R%: I
gsTRT ^r *^<= fe^rr ferrar- <*
^ Al fa pEPRJ^ffifTfî" TiRW 5": I
^MMiircmy^yKîî n
A DIGAMBARA PATTVALI, TAKEN FROM A
OP THE PKSHIKAPRATIKRAMANAKRIYA
( VASYAKASUTRA). ' -
^TCTrttarfc Il
'ffalfrf44W 4H*f'd \fk:
lWZ fcT R-^cRTH^T: I
ir^rrfgft4JN444j#s * iT fcif ^^^. Il \ Il
tPT^. ^11| ftT^RR^TrsWf II II

^ 'TT^J: ^ cFT^ Il 9 II
d*)r*t.TlHI^ +^^: I
îTNI^WdT \ 3q"[cr]^TWmr: I
^Hfa: y^lAmhUIR': Il ^ Il
: 4Z$t lîl^^îr^ I
"fat ttsnW ^ : Il Il
WitfrlStfl-M # 4Wd: I
"^^ PHr 3: II II
164
A DIGAMBARA PATTAVALI.
<\ $: ?^: Il ^ II
^^ ?\ Rt?4^ : I
^ ^ \o
^-'^ R<id*lltH: Il \ II
1<0 ^^?^ I
^ : feTW: Il \\ Il
^ ?^ iTr^5t 1??: I
4P#5îft^5 JoRîrr5^^: Il \ Il
%??: ^^ tRTTqMTiiT: Il \ II
1=| 4tHt 14: ffPTnKf: I
C&4 rar^ ^*%*: Il \. Il
mtM\ "Pr4i # ^^: i
gr^rrfiff%: T^T: pspjftf: Il \^ Il
srrwt ^: I
RTrr^Tl^W^f $$\: Il V II
"^fH^T 4lftflfft74lR<14l:4Tg i
^^: <#* : Il \ Il
: \m4Z41W$(ri: $$ Il H H
acifcrifePTtfrfrlf'^m 4TRT: I
f^T^TJ'fircT: ": I
frT: RWTi<=IKU|J|J|4'l<|pTNiH"i
PERT: ^fr Jfs^RRdfelNjftJWH.

4+h<igTcn^17c -\*\(4 II "
ffSTfmr: ^^: 4te4W4llW|aiMclK: Il
DIQAMBARA PATTAVAU.
#^rf^f^: \ [^r] ?\ 3^"

^ rfnWT: tTFWrrfrsT
^^ PTfq-gtr^tr^r
41^KMidt : ^: II ^
rit ^WTr^RiH^n^WTcpT: pffrJcT ^^ gipRT : I
PTrrRTgfTJ^Riqt ^<
4t ^ " ^ ?$< 5R: Il ^ II
WRTiRm t|%|:
4l4d[pf|rRTT ^: v il
q^^V^HÎWH^lirC^l^^lfTa^R-: I
4t ^tgRW^rlriTTq-: ^PFTifRT:
\ ^^^,\ ^#^: II ^ H
^Tfcrf^rnrpf^^^ Wjt W pi : || ô ||
4W4|s?falii
^ SWtrffa: I
f3cTRTTW: fl^dMMtt'I
5RPT TcT<iTTr ^fsRpViST: \\\\ Il
l^^r^r^grr^mrsftr i
%^'*<^"11- srarrg^j ^r II ^
165
166
A DIGAMBABA PATTA VAU.
rcTR^nr M tfstf ^^ II W II
AIts|i>JdK<4ld Jrif % 5f^
q^fawfor+^lfKI fsRTra^T^ ; I
i^ f^rspfi5pr ^1|
MW^FTCT gWi^tt-: TFiT^: f: \\ \4 II
Nnft ^-|: U^R^r RflîVT II \ II
wt ^^^ fa^ I
d ^li^lll^ltTH'r "^TuNT: ffft
tK+ (? ^^.^^^: || ^ ||
^MrafWci#: 4IKT >|: Il Vs Il
<?: Û4lA4ftfrR4% ^fpftcrtrintf": I
sfHlT^rg ^pTTcTPKrRRfrcrtspT: Il v il
*#^ ^^? er [nw] H<uiRyi4i II ^
=|[]<*<: II o ||
<TJR# MId) 4d|fcK'lullilu1t: I
qiNWNc||^4 ilfcn" f|y<Wcl II tf\ Il

^ *": Ol?:] ^"3; I
^ g#TPT 4T: flmMÎ Il H
cft ftra^4TRir ft4 asil ifc ûl HHN=lfa: ^ II
lTALOGUE of vedic books belonging to h. h. the

maharaja of alwar.
4*4
^-
FJTR.
^.
*.
ff^fr^: V**
\
V
^- x-Y
4N''?'
i ni,
te
*?;;
444l:^": V-
* ^ ^%*:
^r.
fa ,-*1
4flJul4
îW.
\\
\
\\
V
^
OTT
^4
444L
<|
?.4<*
|7%
'
fran^5:
^
4V
4^4i*4.
.^.
V
0
168
CATALOGUE OF VEDIC BOOKS BELONGING
3Tffqj4lt-
4*4
>.
4**F4.
^wmRiîkh
*
4s
5*5.
^^.
?% \-
^f4^-^3T \-
'^* \-
^ > v
5 \-
'^'^
^ ^.
:-
*:
^*
^
* STf^nsTt.
tt
4lfiHs*HlwlC
lt?
^":
?'
TrT^f^'^T
5*ft4T:..
\*
*\
W \<
HH.
\<\
^^
43
^ vv
*:
X*
\\
\|V
':
*><|:
<Rd<i-
*?
VV
\
^^''
V*
*41*:
fNnr^ft
&-
W
V
169
. H. THE MAHARAJA OF ALWAR.
4*4
*\.
^.
: T^fll. fa<T.
|^4:
-4<h*f'r4f>r:
44fa:
T ?
34IHflij*ltl
^:
4V
4544STWI
.
**^*':
*=
V3
*T *
''.
\
ff?fT: \-
^^^
:: \-
^ ^ \~*
T *--><:
V,
vu
,
gff?
STTTPff
MK^'*l4H4r.
TTî
\\\
\
^-
!jrf))|tfl|4:
^3*
^
STWSrT3
"<;
*
^^*
|
|
!
^5^
; ^"':
:
fo
^: .
^^^
-..-
*R*ft
170
^f^TTT.
rtÂIM^ :
(. $3*.
*S4T*:
...
*
^-^^
4*NhhI4TC: ....
...
W
V<v
<
41&tf^ft 57.
iffÎT
...
s^rrfe
VI
>
*TtHPI.
...
s^rbfa.
W
W
4H". m*
TtfTPilbilHL
v\
\
^^^
STHTf! * .
TtTTTw
*/$<11;
...
...
?:
=?*3|: ^vn-ÎPTVT444fcT: ^-
nrîf^rr
*\
.
^:
- "
?
^.
\v
^VijhH0!*!
I*
er
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...

3
5
171
TO H. H. THE MAHARAJA OP ALWAR.
'.
3T.
^^
.
I *4KHlff-
"rrl.
TrnH
. tft?.
tt
SfO
>
^.
^^.
*
^:
STSTWiRi'
V
v
Jrfrt44.
nf^rtefasTT
3.
<1*^:
4VWZ-
"
H
* 3^7t
V ?
^ ^
\ ...
?f&T4?
ftj%
*
\ 3fftT?t
3"
arep-IPt
43 *

V ^.
*<<
172
CATALOGUE OF VEDIC BOOKS BStONGINO
??
^.
V
V
<fffarMi'*5"'.
^^
'-
*.
?1.
'-,-
*M4'4*ll*?fuIH4rFf?Tf%V,.v
*v
W 5%:
**
%*
4T> %:
'inVF' :
Yo
V
\\
Yo
Y\
V4
v*
vv
V
v<
iftcTTsf:
^:
^^:
3TfH4*r?*
*1<4:
) : ...
fo
V4
*^
^YY
VftPmr: ... *Y
^ |:
^= ..
^':
"*%:
| !: .-
Vf
infosfSr:
Y
Y
YX
4"
4\
44*l4lft:
\ hCT^T^frr:
^^;
SR-'fff^KTT^r:
I
\
!
I
TPTOTS":.
4ft|^: ...
<*: ...
?TT*5?:
5?fFf^PTqr5^f:
':
<rt
riy + IK^r
^^'
<<Y
^^:
V-
<rt
H
^^:
<<x
*
Ci
4
ijrfs
^*
(
4*
:tTTP*
?0 ^Pit.
5Y
173
TO H. II. THE MAHARAJA OP ALWAR.
T'4
q^rr5!.
".
i^WT.
* *^.,
*\
fnpr
^.
*^*#
trm*rWr
*^^%:
:
4^>ffrfff4Il*lrtfqH'*:
*rf<H4lrtr
\%
4ftif4T
^-+^^.
^-^
tfST*,-^
^- V4*
.
Vooo
11?51^
Tf?T:
...
*3
e
O
: ...
:
Cf^l^HIWiL
Jjfjjî* &.
qfi^l^WtsRT
^^:
^rrHiro ^'
"rofa
^;
^^
TTJft'^TWrÎ'L
^-^
^ <<
174
CATALOGUE OP VEDIC BOOKS EELONGINO
4*q
*?.
4.
^^^:
?1-=*|:
%?.
\%
\*
5*1*^|'?.
\\
^.
7^%
fl^rT.
X*
\
\
^rt*ul4flftr2"^
?<1^*
lnrrwfire^
hTf^f:
4*
\\
^:
Vo
g^m%:
^J=7ffTl^<u|ff
STTff':
34^:
^:
$?
v<t
lf
T*l<*fs4r
^^^
v*
*5?^?>,
11
4^
\\
W *f
\\\ ^5^
rTfT
s
"5: ..
\\\
Ttf
^ f%4Trair ^ * -
w
x\
\\
% ^T4
y*
4*
4V.
ve
<?:
q-o q^jf^:
^':
*:
??T
175
TO H. H. THE MAHARAJA OF ALWAK.
*([.
^'.
44ifi[.
grr To ^> 1*1%: I

Ril<!4gfrl:
*^:
|
HpHsJJT?':
fiTWRTV:
*Tgff*IPTC
0 "Tffire-sH"!^?:
?
4f4T5:3To V*>
ÂJHlriHl^lg:
^.
^^ ^-
: X"
*rrsrpr V"$
57=?:
^4^
'*.
*1<^'
^-<
, ^^^
7!.
176
CATALOGUE O VEDIC BOOKS BELONGING
177
TO It. H. TIIK MA1IAU.TA OK ALWAR.
T^^TT.
^"t^PT.
^ ar
il H.
\\
3pT*T%f":
*?:
*"45'"3T4W(^4Vl4Kft
^
fr.
^"
V4
TT: V*
* v>*
\-*
=^gHre4r4tT:
..
* ^*-
.
W"
t&4
*
^:
^1*1'^*"
-<\
'\
\\
\\
^ *44vM:
aft ^%
% ^^
5*1 *?^..
<<
]-0 41|4}*| :
ft4 **:
^ ^.
^ ^^brw:-...
178
^.
S\
<51*
^ '
3
So
it g <*i**f44i<i:
tr ":...
^h 11:
f^<u4^^t*i54.
a?
ay
rf
*1*|*.!
^**,
^
*%:.
ÎFfl.
^*14"ul*l ^
*1"*<.:
=*1'*<1
V
wn44
***11
ajciôrw
*.
tftfrNT:
dWIH4.
41
X
X
XX
'fift 3TTf%4TT
vv
^^
X***
4lifi*T:
XX
Xo
^t 44\f
^ft^ntore.
^-*?
^
XS
va
V
^
^:
ftN
M
179
T^Wif.
^T^TR.
kiiPr.hhri:
^*
\*\
^'
5*?
<
AT
*
ijo
11^11.
?
<
rrif'PrrsrTH:
VV
(
?tt?
'.
srf^mrwR.
34
HT?
>.
V
at
^
arRrarwrw
Y\\
^'!.
rf
g^fhTR4d4<r*ui
s
V
V
*31??.
V.
#|'?
?.
VV
-
^.
|^
^:
%?
, V*
180
CATAI.OCI'F. OF VEDIC BOOKS BELONGING
3TTrjni-
afir-ir
T=WT.
^.
cpTlPr.j .
s\
M
y*
.
rfa
TRl^L
\v
V
:
Vi
V.
*rr^Tsrc:
!.
WfaT^ffalT:
wfwt
Tfrnrftwr
<<*
3.
*?.
#*^ "*
,,
StTCP-K
:
V.
53fffff?faferr4VrI.
* "TÎ%:
'
i
3WI*T34T
'
3
V.
grrffa:
V-
^^^
5.
^.
V
^.
M
4T3TR.
%1'
'.11
V.
H. H. THE MAARAJA OF AI/WAR.
pwr.
*
*|*<1?
aTPPTrfRtel.
^
fW^rcTTftftre^
^^
^.
^''.
^wfprWrirqL
^?!.
*5?*5
*1*|?(*1*;. ...
"ftrit^TTf^nr^M':
qTTar^frRT5r:
''^:
TT^FTIrq-^frr:
f^FTfrRr^qîw:
181
(*1., tti
V
\
V
ve
TOT4-R4:
^-^'''':
4T^f:
rfr crwr^T^fa.* r T^fr:

i^ra-frcraf^-^ : . . .
^'
-:
4V
*ffin*qfn4..
^^
<1:
f^lPTrfif:
3"^1^??*!:
"
182
^.
. fri:.
\
X*
w
OT4%$falFjft
*
^:
\
\
1:.
^
ntTVWTBrTq: ...
?
V
V4
V
tf
*:
^^:
rff^
*\
\\
|5
\\
\\
*%|
V.
Ira
Ira
''.3.
Ira
V
V<
V*
V
V
V
Frora^f
^:
5o
^* :
sirRrnwi:
\\
V
V
<%7
&*
;
^qH>rrf?7Bnr
\\
STTfdprfr
11^'
V
V
?^?<:
183
TO H. H. THE MAHARAJA OP ALWAR.
*.
5
1<19
^^'
^ ',
^.
i^rriSt.
*Tffq?ft-
%
\\
H?l4fil8*t
^^
W
\
NO
Rrrrr^TiT:
^*!*
\*
'
LISTS, IN DEVANGARI AND ENGLISH CHARACTERS,

OF MSS. ACQUIRED FOR GOVERNMENT.*
iT=WT.
^^.*"; *.
^-
1^113!:.
-AiSJ*IH^4ul4L<T4T
^THrrT^brwT:
! ^^
. | 4^l4^74^rr
7 -""-+="1<'1
V* **1-(*.
?.^ .
^^
%%^
\*
V
<r
...
*

^^''-
I Tf^ffi^M.
V<
* '-
ff^ff^T:
^^-"!^
V<
\
\
V>J
^
V*
4
4
*v
V
V*
VV
^
...
v
*
...
v*
>
...
\\e-
4
^
W
\\
\
* \W\
...
\\
\4
\*
W
W
...
v*
vr
4 4V
...
3TTT'..
IS
IfTPH^r^PI.
'.
"-
^
.
1??'1
? 14 [^^.
43 j *lfi:^ft4liq%rq3iTr'~W:nT-
^ ^?:
*)|'-
3TrFf7%T.
* Note.Cols. 48 arc given only in the Dcvaimgari list.
far-
TH.
=.
4%
3o
'
"4
i9Vo
''''*!
1')'<|*1.
^rfr.
*:...
en
V
v.
vv
*
vv
^.
*4
<J: crter :KWVlt^-
X*
-.-.: \
*
\\
V-
w
3
ftr^fnrr ^^
V3TtffT%:
^^:
R*ll+<:
Wt
v^
XV
V- \v
V
v
Vi
*V
^'^'^-"
3&*
<*irtp)"|3T:
1??<"
vv
4-
*t
^.*^"$:
Vo vê
".
. ^"+4:
*hi4.
V*
* Vft
to
1 V
f4bflH\<iAm(- wr- !|*<% : ^

*^- \
vTirusri*
...
^ :
ITfrrf^R':i^FHt^TCJW|^:-
^ff:
rcfipf^*[.
...
...
T^TSTJRtrPr 1 tpfitî*M4-^
^*-
*frT^Rl t4u*rh "fal : . fftT:
^-^VTFfrPt T^nf^r.
^*^*"?:
VV

STMirar *
pcf -
*$;
^."
*m-*rf^rMi^Hy*4tfir^rr
? - ..
4<$4\\9-
^: ..
f^^TH^:
^nfT^^ffavrfal |4sl 4$zt # ftfr>1 -^. *: .

*^*'51<5*1<4- :...
TW #^* J.
''': .. .~
v<
...
ôV
W*
*v
*:
...
...
W
"
...
( 4 )
".
^.
^.
. !-:
4
'^'^'
%
\\
V*
44
F5T4T:
^<1*>5^
4V
4V W
V
V
...
V
X*
V
V
...
v<
1
*
Xo
Vo
\*
Vv
...
...
6j>T*^<ftf4444<H%jf.:
RHHO^^Ht
Hf^Ti
...
CT:*^
^'.
*.
...
arm.
...
...
04ft .
Vt
^
4'?*<*1safari.
Ti44lrt
^ ^*
*.
f'WT.
tnnrSr. --, rrrsf.
^^^hNt ...
W V*
,*%;
**<{
;*|?^^
P^ri4**HW
Y
V*
:.
* | .\ $
V v^
^Ntô
':
V
\\
<>^: tri :
v<
WvTT?rr4
<*.>
^
^
M
'RT*.
^pr.
4rT#qi4vgf:
*
^^:
5jrw.
Y
3T4F:
*:
-=|*1+1*
X*
1^1<*1
^:
| ^':
^ ^1*3^4*1*1: flftT: -
Yo <=
YY
4* V
T=ft;PT.
Hill.
29310
892.15
PI4I1
1-2
O R
m4
4>*%
. "^9
4>
\i
i , \

Peterson 1 Detailed Report of Operations in Search of Sanskrit Manuscripts 1883

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Peterson 1 Detailed Report of Operations in Search of Sanskrit Manuscripts 1883

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Peterson 1 Detailed Report of Operations in Search of Sanskrit Manuscripts 1883

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized

by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the

in the ( of IgUw tyovh

OPERATIONS SEAKCH OF SANSKEIT MSS.

PEOFESSOR PETER PETERSON.

Extracts from MSS. acquired for Government, and

List of MSS. acquired for Government

Appendix I. Catalogue of the Palm-leaf MSS. in

Appendix II.Bana ; his predecessors and contemporaries

ttOYAL ASIATIC SOCIETY.

Detailed Report of Operations in search of Sanskrit MSS. in

OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OF SANSKRIT MSS.

his career ; and it is substantially the arrangement under which

IN THE BOMBAY CIRCLE.

and in my work generally; and to -whom I am exceedingly indebted

OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OF SANSKRIT MSS.

Tho Chnmchnryftsntakam nnd

Among my first acquisitions in

long list of writings by the Kashmirian author, Kshemendra.* The Ch ch a r y s a t a k a m,

IN THE BOMBAY CIRCLE.

The motive for another maxim is probably a sanitary one still

sTFir' <lsH<i f^rr 3 ?ref*Hi u

OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OF SANSKRIT MSS.

work, as Bhler pointed out, is valuable on account of the nume

IN THE BOMBAY CIRCLE.

shini, (18) vasantatilakam, (19) mlin, (20) narkutam, (21) prithv,

OPERATIONS IN SHAKCH OK SANSKRIT MSS.

T'Tlt frrE3* +Irftl4j

IN THE BOMBAY CIRCLE.

I procured the present MS., had heard of a poem, resembling the

OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OF SANSKRIT MSS.

WHTTWfrTW frT: 4KJc4ggJT3j|

T ITT firrc%nr?rcff ffer %% II

Kshemendi- here, after speaking slightingly of the poet who has

IN THE BOMBAY CIECLE.

enticing with his upajtis as is a garden full of jUi flowers. The

> the curious account of the sabh

* Bhler's Kashmir Eoport, p. 40.

OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OF SANSKRIT MSS.

Mankha* read his new poem the Srikanfchacharita, mention is made

Buhler, an otherwise unknown poet,

H4t 2*% sit

IN THE BOMBAY CIRCLE.

The Smbapachsika is full of the Saiva doctrine of the oneness

No. 165 is a small book, hitherto I believe

describes himself as the son of the minister

OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OF SANSKRIT MSS.

yanivallabhadeva. In the last line of his commentary to the present

* Kashmir Report, p. 67.

IN THE BOMBAY CIRCLE.

flfaf & vPTri frrPj

l^m??rr^c ^ ^ ^r *% iftfrrf^%4Tirfrr [;]

OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OF SANSKRIT MSS.

''^ hptttt i^reitf^rT:

qrimH.-^ - <T [fr] fl^frf%W: Il

IN THE BOMBAY CIRCLE.

primers and abstracts.'* That is to say, his commentary is a Shorter

If we allow time for Rudrata's fame to be so firmly established

OPERATIONS IN SEARCH OF SANSKRIT MSS.

<<4<|0 wr^rfWv W4i&vnm:

t4>IW><^>4l?ir f44<<rt t<rtrtinhflf I

* Frcr fTft?pr gfcm V*

TT KHdHft : (-4dW II

fMbTPT7r4TiftTfwri 3RRl+l4r | TH4TWJT*f4 ^3^; - Il

d4fH4W nHIA^A! 44111 <1$^1. H

<1<1 |44 T% ? %tf 4fi>*4\ I