Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Carring Fishmeal Cargo

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Fishmeal cargo loading and associated problem of self heating

Fish meal, or fishmeal, is a commercial product made from fish and the bones and offal from processed fish. It
is a brown powder or cake obtained by drying the fish or fish trimmings, often after cooking, and then grinding
it. If it is a fatty fish it is also pressed to extract most of the fish oil

Fishmeal is a nutrient-rich and high-protein supplement feed ingredient that stores well, and is used primarily in
diets for domestic animals and sometimes as a high-quality organic fertilizer.
Fishmeal products manufactured from oily fish, principally anchovies and sardines, normally contain about 810% fish oil unless specially defatted. The standard products are classified as hazardous cargoes and are
covered by entries in the IMDG Code, The relevant entries are in Class 4.2 (Spontaneously Combustible) or
Class 9 (Miscellaneous) UN Nos. 1374 and 2216.
The original fishmeal trade involved products now falling into the Class 4.2 category. The basic requirements
for the carriage of cargo of this type were that it was bagged and aged for a period of not less than 28 days
between production and loading on the carrying ship.
Stowage was by the double strip stow method, that is, the bags were stowed longitudinally in the cargo spaces
with transverse channels every two bags. Cargo stowed in this way was to be ventilated throughout a voyage,
weather permitting. There were also requirements in terms of maximum oil content, maximum and minimum
moisture contents and temperature at the time of loading. Strict adherence to these conditions permitted
generally uneventful carriage of fishmeal over protracted voyages. It will be appreciated, however, that the
stowage requirements resulted in a high stowage factor and were expensive in both labour and materials
(dunnage).
It has been known for many years that heating of fishmeal to the point of fire is due to aerial oxidation of
reactive chemical sites on fish oil molecules. All oxidation reactions are associated with the product of heat.
Thus, the rationale behind the practice discussed briefly above was that the most reactive material was oxidised
during the aging process and the residual oxidisable material reacted with atmospheric oxygen at a rate at which
the heat produced could be removed by ventilating air under the conditions of stowage stipulated. It followed
that if some procedure could be found which would either eliminate or drastically reduce the rate of oxidation it
would be possible to carry oily fishmeal products as bulk cargo, or as bagged cargo in block stow.
Certain shipowners approached the problem by the use of inert gas. Special ships were built which were
equipped with onboard inert gas producing equipment, similar to that used on tankers, and had hatchcover
systems which were substantially airtight. This system works satisfactorily provided the number of loading and
discharging ports served on a single voyage is limited. It will be appreciated that each time a hatchcover is
opened the inert atmosphere is replaced by air and the inerting operation must be repeated again when the
hatches are closed.
The fishmeal industry sought to resolve the problem by modifying the product to render it inert or less
susceptible to oxidation. This was achieved by the addition of antioxidant during the production of the meal.
Fishmeal suitably treated with antioxidant was included under Class 9 (Miscellaneous Dangerous Substances )
in the IMDG Code. Antioxidant-treated oily fishmeal, conforming to the requirements of the Code, can be
carried either as a bulk cargo or in bags in block stow. This permitted relaxation of both stowage and ventilation
requirements during ocean carriage. Introduction of antioxidant-treated fishmeal on a large scale roughly
coincided with drastic fall in the annual production of fishmeal on the west coast of South America. However,
sufficient cargo was shipped for it to be apparent that the process could give a stable product for carriage in
bulk or block stow.
In 1982 there was a series of incidents involving serious heating, sometimes to the point of fire, in fishmeal
cargoes shipped from Chile on various long ocean voyages.Some facts of general interest have emerged during
investigations. Fishmeal is produced by cooking the fish and extracting oil and aqueous fluids mechanically.

The cake which is produced is then dried and milled. The milled meal is cooled and treated with antioxidant
(ethoxyquin), usually by spraying the meal as it passes through a trough.
As indicated earlier, heating of fishmeal is due to atmospheric oxidation. The chemical process is complex and
involves a series of reactions. The amount of heat produced by these reactions varies. The reactions producing
most energy are those towards the end of the series. Antioxidant stops the reaction chain before these later
reactions can occur.
Antioxidant is used up as treated fishmeal ages. If an insufficient quantity is added at the time of production, it
will be used up before the condition of the fishmeal has been stabilised. As a result, at some stage after
production, oxidation will start, producing substantial quantities of heat and the risk of a serious rise in
temperature in the affected meal. However, this will not be evident for some time after loading. This was the
case in shipments from both Chile and Peru mentioned earlier in this article.
When serious heating occurs, this can result in carbonisation and/or fire. Many small isolated pockets of bags
may be involved. During investigations, these pockets were found in regions of maximum ventilation and also
in the interiors of large block stows. It follows that the primary cause was the intrinsic reactivity of the contents
of a few bags rather than unsuitable stowage or ventilation.
Bagged fishmeal
Bagged fishmeal presents the majority of problems.
Documentation
The master should have onboard a copy of the latest IMDG Code. Entries for fishmeal are on pages 58, UN
No.1374 for unstabilised fishmeal and pages 103, UN No. 2216 for stabilised (i.e. anti-oxidant treated)
fishmeal. He should also have a copy of the IMO Code of Safe Practice for Solid Bulk Cargoes (IMSBC Code)
latest edition, where the entry for stabilized fishmeal can be found at pages .
The master must ensure that he obtains and retains certificates for antioxidant treated fishmeal as required by
the Code, covering all the cargo loaded; that these certificates give all the information required; and figures
given conform with the requirements set out in the special provisions at page 189, Section No 907, Volume 2 of
the Code.
Since de-regulation of the fishmeal trade in Peru, certificates may be issued by a person or company recognized
by the Government of Peru, the competent authority. Certificates for Chilean fishmeal, which very rarely gives
problems, are issued by IFOP.
Action to be taken by the ship or surveyors acting for the ship during loading
The temperature of the contents of as many bags as possible should be measured. Where these do not comply
with the requirements under special provision 300, page 188 of the Code, the relevant bags must be rejected. If
high temperatures are being observed it may be necessary to stop the loading of the relevant parcel to allow
more extensive temperature checking. Any wet or water-stained or caked bags should be rejected. It must be
appreciated that fishmeal cargoes packed in black woven polypropylene bags with staining are not readily
detectable. Thus again it may be necessary when such staining is observed that loading of the relevant parcel is
suspended or slowed to allow a proper examination. Torn bags should also be rejected.
Stowage
Standard stowage practice for bagged cargoes should be adopted, i.e. use of double dunnage on decks and tank
tops and provision of a spar ceiling or adequate dunnage to prevent the cargo coming into contact with the
ships sides, pipes and bulkheads especially those which are liable to become heated.
Details of stowage precautions for fishmeal can be found at pages of Volume 1 of the 2009 edition of the IMDG

Code. For UN 1374 fishmeal, where loose bags are carried, double strip stowage is recommended, provided
there is good surface and through ventilation.
For UN 2216 fishmeal,where loose bags are carried, no special ventilation is required for block stowages
IMDG Code, Volume 2, page 103. Flammable materials such as paint should be removed from storerooms
immediately above or adjacent to cargo spaces loaded with bagged fishmeal.
Installation and operation of temperature sensors
The IMO requires that the temperature of cargo in each hold is monitored. This can only be satisfactorily
performed by installation of remote reading sensors. The Committee specially recommends that installation is
not performed by the ships crew as they should be solely engaged observing loading operations.
The BC Code requires that the temperature of cargo in each hold is monitored throughout the voyage. This can
only be satisfactorily performed by the installation of remote reading sensors which are normally connected to a
switch box which also has a connection for a readout meter. The installation is normally carried out by a
specialist survey organisation who are employed by the shippers or charterers. The Committee specifically
recommends that installation is not performed by the ships crew as they should be solely engaged observing
loading operations. It is common to install sensors at two or three levels in a lower hold and one or two levels in
a tween deck depending on the depths of the relevant spaces. Between four and eight sensors are distributed at
each level depending on the cross sectional area of the cargo spaces.
The master should obtain a drawing from the installation operator indicating the locations of sensors in each
cargo space. At completion of loading, for preference, but in any event when all sensors have been installed, the
master or chief officer should check the temperature as indicated by each sensor in the presence of the installing
operator. This will ensure that the ships command is conversant with the equipment. It will also show whether
each sensor is functioning correctly.
Abnormally high or low figures will indicate malfunction from the outset of the voyage. At this stage it is
impractical to replace sensors and such an operation should not be attempted. The installing operator should be
asked to sign the entry covering the first set of recordings which should be entered, as read, in a bound book.
Subsequently, the figures for each sensor should be read and recorded in the book each watch for the first few
days of the voyage. If they are more or less stable they may subsequently be read at eight-hourly intervals as
required under Special requirements (2) in the BC Code entry. If some temperatures in a space start to rise,
temperature reading should revert to four-hourly intervals for all sensors in the space.
From experience, it is known that there can be some increase in temperature (possibly up to 34C) as recorded
from some sensors, at the outset of a voyage after which the temperature stabilises. This situation need not give
rise to concern.
If, however, the temperature of one or more sensors exceeds 40C and continues to rise, the master should take
timely steps to seal the relevant hatchcovers using sealing tape and if necessary plastic or foam sealant or
cement.
Consideration should be given at this stage to sealing ventilation openings; owners and charterers should be
informed of the temperature figures and their advice / instructions sought. Members of the Committee are on
occasions requested to advise owners or charterers when this situation arises and advice is normally given on
the temperature trends over a time period. Hence when a master is forwarding information he should ensure it is
clear and the temperature figures for each cargo space are always reported in the same sequence.
In any event, the instructions in the BC Code entry Special requirements (3) should be followed, i.e. if any
temperature sensors indicate a cargo temperature in excess of 55C, the cargo space and any interconnecting
cargo space should be sealed effectively and ventilation restricted. If self-heating continues, then CO2 or inert
gas should be injected as stipulated in the fire fighting manual provided by the installers of the system. The
injection should take place slowly over a 24-hour period. It is basically undesirable to inject less gas than is
recommended in the manual, even though this means that only a few cargo spaces can be so treated.

It should be appreciated that any cargo heating results from an oxidation process. This means that the oxygen
concentration in a hold is depleted and the concentration of nitrogen (an inert gas) increases. Hence, in a sealed
hold, cargo heating tends to be selfquenching. It is therefore of paramount importance that the master has all
necessary materials onboard to allow very efficient sealing of cargo spaces in order to minimise atmospheric
interchange. Very efficient sealing may be a time-consuming operation, but should never be skimped.
Technically, provided that hold sealing is adequate, it would be possible for a ship with cargo heating in all her
holds, to sail safely across the Pacific Ocean with her CO2 supply exhausted (assuming a sufficient reserve for
the engine room). However, such action would only be recommended if sealing efficiency could be guaranteed.
Under normal circumstances, where there is obvious progressive heating, a ship would be recommended to go
to a port of refuge to obtain adequate CO2 supplies. This often involves fitting a bulk tank containing several
tonnes of CO2 .
If considered necessary, further sealing should be performed whilst the ship remains in port. Unless special
circumstances prevail, sealed hatchcovers should not be opened until the first discharge port for that hold is
reached. An accurate assessment of the situation in any cargo space can be obtained by measuring the oxygen
concentration via a pipe connected to an oxygen meter which is introduced ideally via dedicated points of
access or alternatively by slightly opening an access manhole. The manhole should be closed and secured
immediately after measurements have been taken.
Although some ships have oxygen meters onboard and have crew conversant with their use, it is generally
recommended that, where possible, measurements of oxygen levels are made by surveyors. If they are made by
the ship, the instrument should be checked immediately before use by checking the oxygen concentration of the
external atmosphere (20.8%). When oxygen levels are below 10% heating is greatly restricted. Even without
use of CO2, this situation may be achieved in a few days where hatches are effectively sealed and there is a
substantial quantity of cargo heating in a hold.
Discharge fishmeal
Heating cargoes (if any) should be discharged first. However, where this is not practicable, the rate of spread of
heating in a cargo space can drastically be reduced by maintaining a low oxygen concentration. This is done for
preference by the use of CO2 or when supplies are not available by keeping the holds sealed.
It must be appreciated, however, that once the holds are opened for discharge and the oxygen concentration is
allowed to rise to at least 20%, which is necessary for safe working in the hold, heating will resume at an
accelerating rate. Hence attempts should be made to discharge pockets of heating cargo as soon as possible. On
some occasions this can be achieved without difficulty. However, on occasions smoke generation becomes
excessive, preventing manual operations. There are then several options for dealing with this problem and the
choice depends on the circumstances prevailing.
The first option is to reseal the hold and inject CO2, the minimum quantity injected being that recommended by
the installers of the ships CO2 system. Again this operation should take place over a 24-hour period. The hold
should then be left sealed for at least four days.
The oxygen concentration must again be allowed to rise to 20% before labour is allowed into the space to
resume discharge. This option, when successful, results in the minimum amount of cargo damage but extends
the discharging period. It may be considered impractical if it has to be repeated several times. The second
option is to control smoke evolution by the use of water sprayed through a fine spray directly onto the smoking
cargo, whilst discharge proceeds. This procedure, if properly used, results in limited water damage to part of the
cargo. However, excessive water is often applied, particularly when the local fire service intervenes, and the
amount of cargo wetted can be substantial.
Very occasionally, the cargo will actually ignite. Flames should be extinguished with a water spray. The third
and last option which should only be used when other methods have failed is to use a water spray to control
smoke evolution or fire and discharge heating pockets by grab. The procedure obviously results in more cargo

damage.
Members of the Committee have had experience of fires in fishmeal igniting flammable cargo in adjacent
spaces with disastrous results. Hence the earlier advice that flammable materials should not be stored in
storerooms adjacent to or above holds loaded with fishmeal.
Damaged and apparently sound cargo should always be separated at the time of discharge. However, even badly
heated cargo has feed value and can be incorporated in cattle feed. Hence, cargo should never be left onboard to
be dumped at sea.
Bagged fishmeal carried in containers
Bagged stabilised (i.e. UN 2216, Class 9) fishmeal may be carried in freight containers as indicated in Volume 1
of the IMDG Code at page 322. It is probable that containers will be delivered alongside already sealed.
However, if the master is in a position to see the containers being stuffed he should ensure they are clean and
that the maximum quantity of bags are placed in each container.
In any event he should ensure that the container doors and other openings are properly tape-sealed to minimise
possible air ingress. On the voyage, the temperature of the outsides of containers, if stowed in accessible
positions should, if possible, be checked regularly by feeling them (in any event, as indicated in Volume 1 of
the IMDG Code at page 322, 7.1.10.3.2.2 Temperature readings in the hold should be taken once a day early in
the morning during the voyage and recorded.
If any container becomes hot they should be cooled using water; ...consequent risk to the stability of the ship
should be considered. 7.1.10.3.2.3. If smoke is seen issuing from a container, a hole should be punched in the
side at the top of the container, a hose nozzle fitted and the container flooded. It is self-evident that masters
must ensure there is reasonable access to any containers stowed under deck.

You might also like