Presence
Presence
Presence
p a I i m p s e s t:
A Trace of the "Presence-Absence" in Architecture
PRE-SCRIPT
The Beginning of a Trace:
Examining the Opposition
This project is a personal investigation into some existing
ideas in architecture. The investigation is based on an attempt
to search for a possible connection between the architeclUTal
ideas of different times and contexiS. Taking the idea of
"Presence-Absence" in architecture as the beginning of the
trace, some inquiries are made into the oppositions:
What does "Presence-Absence" mean?
What does "Presence-Absence" mean in architecture?
What does architecture mean to "Presence-Absence"?
Tracing the idea from different discourses-philosophy and
architecture, the study projeciS some concepts of the opposition from different times --past and present, and from different contexiS--oriental and accidental.
This trace is presented in a continuous series of collages of
"Scripts"--copies and writings of literary text and "Graphic
Scripts" -copies and drawings of illustrated text The presentation takes the form of scrolled reading, starting from left
to right
by Chaiboon Sirithanawat
vo l ume
s e v e n
number
23
REPRESENTATION
PRESENTATION
INTERPRETATION
BEING
PRESENCE
PE.RCEP'I10N
NON-BEING
ABSENCE
CONCEP'I10N
SUBSTANCE
FORM
AKTEFACf
NON-SUBSI'ANCE
SPACE
EDIHCE
a:
defer
Thus "Presence-Absence"
is the mode of representing architecture.
As well, architecture through a continuum of history
is a representation of man's presence
in this absent world.
Is the present architecture an architecture of absence,
one which ceases to represent
the historical continuity?
And is there an "Architecture of the Present,"
one which marks the present stance
in the historical continuum?
If there were such, should we, and how could we,
re-present that which is absent
in the present architecture,
and simultaneously represent
the "Architecture of the Present"?
PAST
MEMORY
HISTORICAL
PRESENT
REAUIY
CONTINUITY
PAST
PRESENT
FUTURE
TEKTONIK
IDENTIFIABLE
"
EPOCH
TECHNOLOGY
"DECONSTRU CI'ION'
OCCIDENTAL
Axioms of Deconstruction:
Axiom 1 Everything can be given at least two equally
cogent explanations.
Axiom 2 In tlte temporal process of thinking about
anything, Ofte explanation collapses into its
contrary.3
-E. D. Hlrsch, Jr.
"Derrida's Axioms
It
-Robert Mugerauer
"Derrida and Beyond"
Le Corbusiu
art
Corinthian Order
Caryatid
~
~
l.a
11
Satural Column
itr's Primitnt Hut
GREEK
Par1htnon Athtn
ROMAN
438 B.C.
"PRESENCE-ABSENCE"
form ~
Abunce
I . ,"'.'
1,'
,)
Presence
''
' ./ '
' ,!.
':
" ,.
~,
,,,,--, ..
' I , I , ; . ' , . , \ t t l /
~ '~
I ' ..
.'t
H. P. F. Labrouste
Bibliothe ue National Paris 1868
GOTHIC
CLASSICIS:\1
Cnthedrnl Rtim
1290
i
R~im ~
1981
ro
Lt Corbu itr
Ctnler lA Corhu\itr Zurich 1967
POST- CRTPT
The End or Trace:
The Absence or "Architecture of the Present"
The second, ''telctooik.., a jXimary principle of the architectural discipline, is another aspect which resides in every
period. The possibility of a new architecture in the aansition
from one period LO another often resullS as a pan of the
exploiLation of new materials and development in construction technology. From ancient LO modem, the great architecture of each period always reveals this exploituion through
"tektonik" -a structural poetic which represents theidentfiabte epoch of architecrure.'
However, both "memory" and ..tektoni:k" are only two aspects in\'Oh'ed in architectural discourse. The achievement
ofarchitecwre, in fact, depends on many aspeclS, and in each
aspect its condition always changes from time LO time, and
from place LO place. Thus, no single concept of architecture
can be app~ted at all times and for all places. Architects
invariably have LO search for that appropriateness for their
specific time and place. Therefore, the paradigm of"Architecture or the Present" is always absent, and is waiting for
NOTES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
W'mg-tsit Chan, The Way of Lao Tzu (New York: BobbsMerrill, 1963), p.lOl.
Francis DJ(. Ching, Archilecture: Form, Space & Order.
(New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1979), p.lO.
E.D. Hirsch Jr. "Derrida's Axioms", in London Reviews.
(1988):p.29.
Robert Mugerauer, "Derrida and Beyond", in Cenler, vol. 4
( 1988): pp.66-67.
Jacques Derrida, "Point de folie-Maint.enantl'architecrure",
in AA files. no.l2 (Swruner 1986): p.65.
As quoted from StBnford Anderson by Kenneth Frampton in
'7owards a Critical Regionalism," The Anli-aesthetic. Port
Townsend, Wash.: Bay Press, 1983; pp.27-8: "Telaoru~
referred not just to the activity of making the materially
requisite consttuction...but rather to the 11Cliviry that
raises this construction to an art form. ..The functionally
adequate fonn must be adapted so as to give expression to
its function. The sense of bearing provided by the enta.sis
of Greek columns became the touchstone of this concept of
Teklonik.
28
The
Fiflh
Column
magazine