Final EIA Project Report For Exploratory Drilling in Block 13t
Final EIA Project Report For Exploratory Drilling in Block 13t
Final EIA Project Report For Exploratory Drilling in Block 13t
PROJECT REPORT
FOR
PROPOSED EXPLORATORY OIL AND NATURAL GAS WELLS DRILLING
PROGRAMME IN BLOCK 13T, TURKANA COUNTY, KENYA, BY TULLOW
KENYA B.V.
Prepared by
Earthview Geoconsultants Limited
P.O. BOX 10366-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
Tel: 254-20-2496208
Email: earthview@geologist.com
AUGUST 2012
PROJECT REPORT
FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED
EXPLORATORY OIL AND GAS WELLS DRILLING PROGRAMME IN
BLOCK 13T, TURKANA COUNTY, KENYA, BY TULLOW KENYA B.V.
AUGUST 2012
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) project report presents baseline biophysical
and socio-economic information, project mitigation measures, and an environmental
management and monitoring plan for the proposed exploratory oil and natural gas wells
drilling programme of the National Oil Corporation of Kenya (NOCK, 1987) in parts of
exploration Block 13T in Turkana County. This project report has been prepared for the
project proponent, Tullow Kenya B.V. (TKBV) by Earthview Geoconsultants Limited in
accordance with the requirements of Kenyas Environmental Management and Coordination
Act of 1999 and subsidiary legislation, and in fulfilment of the more general requirement that
projects maintain a clean, sustained and healthy environment. This EIA project report has
aimed at establishing and mitigating any potential impacts of the proposed oil and natural
gas exploration wells drilling operations at the identified sites in the project area.
Following the discovery of oil by Tullow Oil and Heritage Oil in Uganda and more recently
the Ngamia-1 oil discovery in Lokichar, Kenya, by Tullow Oil and Africa Oil companies,
several companies have intensified oil exploration in the Mesozoic and Early Tertiary rift
basins and other sedimentary basins, viz; Anza, Mandera and Lamu of Kenya, with the view
of meeting the local and global energy demand. The discovery of oil in Kenya followed the
acquisition of high quality data due to deployment of advanced data acquisition technologies
such as two dimensional (2D) seismic and Full Tensor Gravity (FTG) which have since
increased chances of oil and gas discoveries in the country. Recently the Ministry of Energy
announced that it had licensed all the 46 oil and gas exploration blocks in Kenya to foreign
O&G (Oil and Gas) prospecting companies save for one, which NOCK is licensed to explore.
According to the Ministry, plans are underway to drill an additional five oil wells in five
Blocks; two onshore and three offshore between June 2012 and December 2013.
The purpose of this project is to determine whether or not there are economically viable oil
deposits in Block 13T, following the oil discovery at Ngamia-1 well in Lokichar, by drilling
more exploratory wells. Usually, following the success of the exploratory drilling, this leads to
drilling of more appraisal oil wells and subsequent production of the same. If the appraisal
wells yield economically viable oil deposits, this will have a significant positive impact in
Kenyas energy sector; it will boost the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and per capita
income, and commercial production of the oil, which shall lead to an improvement of the
socio-economic well-being of the Turkana County and the country in general.
The envisaged exploration drilling project follows the analysis, identification and delineation
of potential hydrocarbon traps based on the seismic data that was acquired during the
recently completed seismic survey programme. Exploration drilling is designed to confirm the
presence of viable quantifiable hydrocarbons in a prospective formation after the location
and extent of a possible hydrocarbon-bearing geological formation has been identified, from
seismic and associated surveys like FTG. Following the acquisition of technically high quality
data and analysis of the same, TKBV intends to drill exploratory wells within the project area,
the first one being the identified Twiga-1 drilling site. Further seismic studies to augment
existing information are being carried out to identify the other exploratory drilling sites. The
exploratory well at Twiga-1 site will be drilled to a depth of 4500m over a period of up to 120
days, once a licence is granted by the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA).
The project is in line with the National Energy Policy (improving access to affordable energy
services, enhancing security of supply, promoting development of indigenous energy
resources; promoting energy efficiency and conservation; and promoting prudent
environmental, health and safety practices), the Economic Recovery for Wealth and
Employment Creation Strategy (expanding and improving infrastructure, developing arid and
semi-arid lands, and safeguarding environment and natural resources), and Kenya Vision
i
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
2030 (enhanced equity and wealth creation for the poor in semi-arid and arid districts, must
generate more energy at a lower cost and increase efficiency in energy consumption).
A detailed environmental impact assessment field study was preceded by extensive desktop
studies, and was undertaken from 23rd June to 4th July, 2012.The desktop study was
conducted to review the available reports, and to design plans and maps in order to compile
relevant biophysical and socio-economic information of the project area. The field study
(detailed environmental impact assessment, community sensitization, public consultations
and social impact assessment, and development of mitigation measures and environmental
management plan) was undertaken during this period. Biophysical studies covered
environmental aspects such as physiography, climate, hydrology, drainage, soils,
geology/hydrogeology, vegetation, wildlife, and aquatic environment. The socio-economic
environmental study covered information on issues such as demography, literacy, social
amenities (healthcare and schools), land use, land tenure, the social dimensions of wellbeing and income levels, water supply, sanitation levels and security, along with other
pertinent issues. Extensive public consultations created knowledge and awareness about
the proposed programme, and also allowed for exchange of views, information and concerns
between the communities, the EIA team and the project proponent. The field study also
enabled cross-checking of the data compiled during the desktop study. The legislative and
regulatory framework has also been extensively explored in this report.
The potential environmental and social impacts, and for which clear, achievable, and
effective mitigation measures have been suggested in this report, include:
Both the field survey and documentation reveal the following active natural processes that
have major and visible impact on the environment: periodic flooding of River Turkwel and
ponding of the floodplain and piedmont plain adjacent to the river; high dust loading in the air
due to strong winds in the floodplains and the northern part of the block, low vegetation
cover and loose surface soils that seal in wet conditions; wind and water erosion; and higher
frequency and intensity of droughts and floods due to climate change. Anthropogenic
pressures include: high demand for water for domestic and livestock use; land degradation
and soil compaction by grazing animals; and pollution of rivers, water pans and shallow
groundwater in luggas from humans and livestock. The communities lack adequate provision
of basic services such as education, health care, affordable energy, potable water and
security. While the communities are fairly stable, their security situation is compromised by
sporadic but often deadly cattle rustling. Conflicts also occur from time to time in relation to
access to natural resources such as water and grazing lands.
The exploratory oil and gas wells drilling operations are regarded, from an industry
standpoint, as being of a small scale in both effort and the time taken to complete them. In
addition the majority of operations will be conducted significant distances away from any
habitation, town or residential areas so that the inhabitants will be largely insulated. The
ii
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
short-term duration (3-6 months) of the exploratory drilling programme and its small scale
relative to natural processes acting on the environment in the area as well as previous
actions undertaken, indicate that the impacts would by and large be temporary and/or
transient, rather than long-term and/or permanent. So far, more than 30 exploratory wells
have been drilled in Kenya since the 1970s with no adverse impacts reported, and year-byyear industry standards relating to environmental protection for projects of this nature are
continually being raised. The measures proposed to mitigate these environmental and social
impacts detailed in the Environmental Management Plan within this report are considered
more than adequate and effective in safeguarding the environmental and social fabric of the
area, and should be strictly adhered to.
The community members and leaders who attended the various public meetings and
participated in the questionnaire survey welcomed the proposed project, but appealed for
adherence to environmental safeguards and labour legislation. TKBV (as outlined in its EHS
[Environmental, Health and Safety] and CSR [Corporate Social Responsibility] Policies) is
committed to environmental protection at the highest level, continual engagement of local
stakeholders throughout the duration of the project, and to being sensitive to local culture
and customs, and would want to be seen as a valued part of the communities in the project
area.
iii
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................................I
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. IV
LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................................................IX
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................................XII
LIST OF TABLES...................................................................................................................................... XIV
CHAPTER 1 ...................................................................................................................................................1
1.1 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................1
1.2 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT ............................................................................................................. 1
1.3 DEVELOPER IDENTIFICATION ........................................................................................................ 1
1.4 BRIEF SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................... 3
1.5 PROJECT BACKGROUND, OVERVIEW, JUSTIFICATION AND OBJECTIVES ........................... 4
1.5.1 Project Background ...................................................................................................................... 4
1.5.2 Overview of the Project ................................................................................................................ 4
1.5.3 Project Justification....................................................................................................................... 6
1.6 PURPOSE OF THE EIA ...................................................................................................................... 6
1.6.1 Administrative and Legal Framework .......................................................................................... 6
1.6.2 The Mandate of NEMA................................................................................................................. 7
1.6.3 Requirements and Scope of Work for the EIA ........................................................................... 7
1.6.4 The EIA Review and Approval Process ...................................................................................... 8
1.7 THE EIA TEAM .................................................................................................................................... 9
1.8 OBJECTIVES OF THE EIA PROJECT REPORT .............................................................................. 9
1.9 TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) ..................................................................................................... 10
1.10 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT .................................................................................................... 10
CHAPTER 2 ................................................................................................................................................. 12
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................................... 12
2.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 12
2.2 PROJECT LOCATION ...................................................................................................................... 12
2.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE OF DESIGN .............................................................................................. 12
2.4 OVERVIEW OF EXPLORATORY DRILLING PROGRAMME ........................................................ 12
2.4.1 Site Preparation .......................................................................................................................... 17
2.4.2 Drill rig specifications and crew facilities ................................................................................... 17
2.4.3 Rigging-up ................................................................................................................................... 17
2.4.4 Drilling Techniques ..................................................................................................................... 17
2.4.5 Casing Operation ........................................................................................................................ 21
2.4.6 Well Logging ............................................................................................................................... 21
2.4.7 Well Testing ................................................................................................................................ 21
2.4.8 Flaring.......................................................................................................................................... 22
2.4.9 Well completion or well suspension .......................................................................................... 22
2.4.10 Well suspension or abandonment ........................................................................................... 22
2.5 DRILLING MUD SYSTEM ................................................................................................................. 23
2.6
WATER SUPPLY.......................................................................................................................... 25
2.7
EMISSION AND WASTE MANAGEMENT ................................................................................. 26
2.7.1 Emissions .................................................................................................................................... 26
2.7.2 Wastes......................................................................................................................................... 27
2.8 DECOMMISSIONING/ABANDONMENT ......................................................................................... 31
2.8.1 General activities ........................................................................................................................ 31
2.8.2 Demolition and site clean-up ..................................................................................................... 31
2.9
OIL SPILL CONTINGENCY PLANNING ..................................................................................... 31
2.10 SUPPORT OPERATIONS .............................................................................................................. 32
iv
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
CHAPTER 3:................................................................................................................................................ 33
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ........................................................... 33
3.1 APPROACH TAKEN FOR THE EIA ................................................................................................. 33
3.2 WORK EVALUATION FOR THE EIA................................................................................................ 33
3.3 TOPICS ADDRESSED AND ISSUES CONSIDERED .................................................................... 33
3.4 COLLECTION OF BASELINE DATA................................................................................................ 38
3.4.1 Overview of Methods.................................................................................................................. 38
3.4.3 Soils ............................................................................................................................................. 39
3.4.4 Climate ........................................................................................................................................ 39
3.4.5 Air Quality .................................................................................................................................... 39
3.4.6 Surface and Groundwater Resources....................................................................................... 39
3.4.7 Terrestrial Environment .............................................................................................................. 39
3.4.8 Aquatic Environment .................................................................................................................. 40
3.4.9 Land Resources.......................................................................................................................... 40
3.4.10 Visual Aesthetics ...................................................................................................................... 40
3.4.11 Noise and Vibrations ................................................................................................................ 40
3.4.12 Solid and Liquid Wastes........................................................................................................... 40
3.4.13 Public Consultations and Socio-Economics ........................................................................... 41
3.4.14 Health and Public Safety.......................................................................................................... 41
3.4.15 Key Informant Interviews ......................................................................................................... 42
3.5 DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP) ............................. 42
3.5.1 The Five- Step Process.............................................................................................................. 42
3.5.2 Assigning Significance Ratings ................................................................................................. 43
CHAPTER 4 ................................................................................................................................................. 44
POLICY, LEGAL, AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ......................................................................... 44
4.1 THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA, 2010 ......................................................................................... 44
4.2 THE POLICY FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................ 44
4.2.1 Environment and Development Policy ...................................................................................... 44
4.2.2 National Policy on Water Resources Management and Development (Sessional Paper No.1
of 1999) ................................................................................................................................................. 46
4.2.3 Energy Policy (Sessional Paper No.4 of 2004) ........................................................................ 46
4.2.4
Land Policy (Sessional Paper No. 3 of 2009) ..................................................................... 47
4.2.5 Mining Policy ............................................................................................................................... 47
4.2.6 Health Policy ............................................................................................................................... 47
4.2.7 Economic Recovery for Wealth and Employment Creation Strategy ..................................... 48
4.2.8 Kenya Vision 2030...................................................................................................................... 48
4.3 KENYA LEGISLATION AND REGULATIONS ................................................................................. 50
4.3.1 The Petroleum (Exploration and Production) Act, Cap. 308 ................................................... 50
4.3.2
The Petroleum (Exploration and Production) Regulations................................................. 50
4.3.3 The Explosives Act, Cap. 115.................................................................................................... 50
4.3.4
The Energy Act, No. 12 of 2006 .......................................................................................... 51
4.3.5
The Radiation Protection Act, Cap. 243 .............................................................................. 51
4.3.6
The Public Health Act, Cap. 242.......................................................................................... 52
4.3.7
The Occupational Safety and Health Act, No. 15 of 2007 ................................................. 52
4.3.8
The Water Act, Cap. 372 ...................................................................................................... 52
4.3.9 The Water Resources Management Rules, 2007 .................................................................... 53
4.3.10 The Local Government Act, Cap. 265..................................................................................... 53
4.3.11 The Physical Planning Act, Cap. 286 .................................................................................. 53
4.3.12 The Wildlife (Conservation and Management) Act, Cap. 376 ........................................... 54
4.3.13 The National Museums and Heritage Act, Cap. 216 .......................................................... 54
4.3.14 The Land Act, 2012 .................................................................................................................. 54
4.3.15 The Penal Code, Cap. 63 ..................................................................................................... 55
4.4 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY - ACT AND REGULATIONS........... 55
4.4.1 The Environmental Management and Co-ordination Act, 1999 .............................................. 55
v
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
viii
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure1.1: Location of the project area ....................................................................................................... 2
Figure 1.2: Location of the proposed Twiga 1 test well drilling site .......................................................... 5
Figure 2.2: Schematic structure of the proposed casing design of exploration wells ............................ 16
Figure2.3: illustrates various waste separation stages based on particle sizes (Adapted from Neff, J M
2005)............................................................................................................................................................ 25
Figure 5.1: Location of the project area. ................................................................................................... 65
Figure 5.2: Administrative boundaries in the project area: Block 13T .................................................... 67
Figure 5.3: Physiography of the project area. ......................................................................................... 69
Figure 5.4: Geology of the project area .................................................................................................... 72
Figure 5.5: Soil map of the project area showing the exploratory drilling sites. ..................................... 75
Figure 5.6: Vegetation types in the proposed project area...................................................................... 86
Figure 5.7: Age bracket data showing average household children numbers ....................................... 96
Figure 5.8: Marital status data in the project area .................................................................................... 96
Figure 5.9: Population distribution trends in the project area (latest population figures (2009 census)
are provided in Tables 5.5 to 5.7).............................................................................................................. 97
Figure 5.10: Education levels attained ..................................................................................................... 98
Figure 5.11: Source of Income data in the proposed project area.........................................................100
ix
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
LIST OF PLATES
Plate 2.1: Shows on-going works at one of the proposed drilling sites a) Installation of septic systems
and b) grease traps ......................................................................................................................... 32
Plate 5.1(a & b): (a) Flash floods in the area can render roads impassable and (b) Lokichar Air strip 68
Plate 5.2: showing Turkwel River floodplain at Katilu Irrigation Scheme in Katilu (southern part of the
block). ............................................................................................................................................. 70
Plate 5.3: Physiography of the project area: a) Floodplain of the Turkwel River, photo taken from Sigir
Hills; and b) Turkana Plain in the northern part of the block, photo taken from Kunyupat Hill,
Lorugumu area. ............................................................................................................................... 70
Plate 5.4: a) Kasuroi Hill(red arrow), Kasuroi area; b) Lokosimekori Hill, photo taken south of Ngamia
camp; c) Kohu Hills in the background - note the gully erosion in the foreground and plain in the
middle ground; and d) Kobroich inselberg Hill, Logogo area ............................................................. 71
Plate 5.5: Gully erosion on the higher ground, Marich area. ............................................................. 71
Plate 5.6: Rugged terrain near Lochwa where cutline 44 has been excavated .................................. 73
Plate 5.7(a & b): (a) Quartzo-feldspathic gneiss Lochwa area and (b) Biotite schist Kasuroi area .... 74
Plate 5.8(a & b): (a) Feldspar-pegmatite vein in Kasuroi area and (b) Basaltic plug on the southeast of
Lochwaa.......................................................................................................................................... 74
Plate 5.9 (1-5): (1) Piedmont plain showing dunes meso relief stabilized by dwarf shrubs (2) Same
unit that is gently undulating and bisected by common narrow rills that support vegetation and with
sandy sealing soils (3) Y10 unit supports livestock grazing (4) profile pit in the unit showing soil
th
horizons and (5) soil structure of the profile, the 5 horizon (Bw2) showing prismatic structure
connotative of Natric B (diagnostic horizon) and soil texture matrix for the profile pit......................... 76
Plate 5.10: (1) Ps28 unit showing typical lugga flowing NE/SW direction in the unit--that support
vegetation (yellow arrow) and gulley forming (red arrow) and (2) The unit showing undulating mesorelief stabilized by Indigofera spinosa, (3) Surface Ponding in Ps28 line 37 &40 junction, that occurred
after some flash floods earlier and (4) profile pit showing soil horizons and (5) profile pit soil texture
and soil structure representing all the horizons sampled. The texture in each horizon respectively is
as follows: A-Sandy Loam to Sandy Clay Loam, Bw1- Sandy Loam to Sandy Clay Loam, Bw2- Sandy
Loam to Sand, C1-Sandy Loam to Sand and C2-Sandy Loam to Sand. The structure in each horizon
respectively is as follows: A-granular and sub-angular blocky, Bw1-angular blocky and prismatic, Bw2granular and angular blocky, C1-prismatic and C2- angular blocky................................................... 77
Plate 5.11(1-4): (1) Ux10 unit showing lugga-cut profile horizons, the background being quartzfeldspar gneiss vein, (2) The shallow (in places moderately deep) soils support poorly anchored
Acacia Senegal vegetation (3) Soil structure showing A-horizon: prismatic and platy structure, C1horizon: fine granular and sub-angular blocky structure, in C2- horizon: granular and sub-angular
structure and (4) profile soil texture: A-horizon: gravely Sandy Clay Loam to Sandy Clay, C1-horizon:
gravelly Sandy Clay Loam, C2-horizon: gravelly Sandy Clay. ........................................................... 78
Plate 5.12 (a & b): (a)Maping unit A8 showing River Turkwel flooplain under irrigation at Katilu and (b)
stratified fluvisol topsoil at the riverbank. .......................................................................................... 79
Plate 5.13(a & b): (a) Dry climate affects soils moisture holding characteristics and the loose and
often pulverized soil is easily windblown and (b) Flash floods that can occur suddenly
characterizes the study area ............................................................................................................ 81
Plate 5.14 (a & b) :( a) Turkwel River in Katilu area. Note the people crossing at a shallow place (b)
Earth dam being excavated south of Ngamia camp.......................................................................... 82
Plate 5.15(a & b):(a) A hand pump operated shallow water well that is used by the local communities
and their livestock at Kasuroi, ( b) Nakukulas borehole donated to the local community by TKBV used
by local communities and their livestock........................................................................................... 83
Plate 5.16(a & b):(a) A hand pump operated shallow water well at Katilu centre adjacent to the
Turkwel River floodplain and (b) a hand pump operated shallow water well at Kanaodon. ................ 83
Plate 5.17: Dwarf shrubland on the southeastern part of line 36 ....................................................... 87
Plate 5.18: A riverine forest on the northwestern part of cut-line 40 .................................................. 88
Plate 5.19: An Acacia seyal dominated shrubland. Lomokamar Hills are in the background (red
arrows) along the northwestern part of line 39.................................................................................. 88
Plate 5.20: Shrubland dominated by Acacia spp, Indigofera spinosa and Calotropis procera around
the proposedTwiga 1 drilling site. ..................................................................................................... 88
Plate 5.21: Grassed shrubland along the Lokichar- Loperot road ..................................................... 89
Plate 5.22: Grassed shrubland on the southern part of line 10.......................................................... 89
x
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Plate 5.23: Near barren habitat along cut line 44. Notice the high concentration of plants along the
interfluves and bare ground in between the interfluves. .................................................................... 90
Plate 5.24(a & b): (a) a white bellied Go-away bird and (b) a Red billed hornbill along the Turkwel
riverine forest................................................................................................................................... 91
Plate 5.25(a, b & c): an Abyssinia Roller encountered along cut line 44, (b) a boomslang up a tree
along cutline 10 (southeastern part) and (c) Some of the many termite hills dotting the study area. .. 91
Plate 5.26: Scenic land features in the project area.......................................................................... 92
Plate 5.27(a & b): (a)Facilities such as desks is a challenge in most schools in the area; (b)Locheremoit Primary School....................................................................................................................... 98
Plate 5.28: A temporary homestead at Lochwaa .............................................................................. 99
Plate 5.29: Bags of charcoal for sale near Lokapel........................................................................... 99
Plate 5.30 Use of solar power to provide energy at Kanaodon Dispensary ....................................... 99
Plate 5.31: Livestock keeping within the project area ..................................................................... 101
Plate 5.32: Subsistence maize farming along River Turkwel in Katilu area ..................................... 102
Plate 5.33: A Banana Tissue demonstration farm at Katilu ............................................................. 102
xi
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
ALRMP
ASAL
BOD
CFC
Chlorofluorocarbon
CLO
COD
CSG
CSR
DHMBS
EA
Environmental Audit
EHS
EIA
EMCA
EMP
E&P
ERP
ERS
EPR
FTSE 100
FTG
GDP
HDPE
HSE
IAEA
LPG
KPR
KREMU
KWS
MSDS
NADM
NEMA
NGOs
Non-Governmental Organisations
NHSSP
NOCK
OBM
OCPD
OGP
OHS
PE
Potential Evaporation
PPE
PRSP
PSC
SCE
TKBV
TOR
Terms of Reference
UNEP
VOC
WBM
WDI
xiii
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1: The EIA team composition ................................................................................................ 9
Table 1.2 Structure of the EIA Project Report................................................................................... 10
Table 2.1: Table of drill rig parts....................................................................................................... 14
Table2.2: Well depths for proposed wells ......................................................................................... 15
Table2.3: Shows various drilling techniques ..................................................................................... 18
Table2.4: Shows the functional categories of materials used in WBM, their functions, and examples
of typical chemicals in each category. .............................................................................................. 23
Table2.5: Summarises the environmental impacts of different atmospheric releases: ....................... 26
Table 2.6: Shows the common wastes and their environmentally significant constituents. ................ 28
Table 2.7: Waste management approaches ..................................................................................... 30
Table 3.1: Topics addressed and issues considered ........................................................................ 33
Table 3.2 Order of meetings held in Block 13T................................................................................. 41
Table 3.3 Impact assessment criteria and rating scales.................................................................... 42
Table 4.1: International conventions that Kenya has ratified ............................................................. 62
Table 5.2: Rock types observed during the field surveys that are significant for project logistics and
EMP. ............................................................................................................................................... 73
Table 5.3: Soil description within specified soil mapping units observed during the field surveys that
are significant for project logistics and EMP. .................................................................................... 79
Table 5.4: Water quality in the project area (SW Shallow Well; BH Borehole). WHO limits are for
drinking water quality: grey shaded boxes show the limits are exceeded. ......................................... 85
Table 5.5: Demographic data by district ........................................................................................... 94
Table 5.6: Demographic data by division.......................................................................................... 95
Table 5.7: Demographic data by location ......................................................................................... 95
Table 5.8: Demographic data by sub-location .................................................................................. 95
Table 7.1: Project impact sources and prediction of impacts on environmental and social structure and
characteristics of the project land area. .......................................................................................... 111
Table7.2: Summary of impact evaluation and analysis from the proposed exploratory oil and natural
gas drilling operations (pre, during and post project) on environmental and social factors in the project
area (see Chapter 3, section 3.5.2 for impact assessment criteria and rating). Note: Project
Operations includes - site preparation, construction, exploratory drilling, decommissioning and
rehabilitation. ................................................................................................................................. 132
xiv
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
CHAPTER 1
1.1 INTRODUCTION
This Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) project report presents baseline biophysical
and socio-economic information, project mitigation measures, and an environmental
management and monitoring plan for the proposed exploratory oil and natural gas wells
drilling programme in the National Oil Corporation of Kenya (NOCK, 1987) exploration Block
13T, which straddles four administrative districts, namely, Central Pokot, Turkana Central,
Loima and parts of Turkana South Districts (latitudes ca. 1.3 to 3N and longitudes ca. 35
to 35.7E) (Figure 1.1). This follows the analysis, identification and delineation of potential
hydrocarbon traps based on seismic data that was acquired during the recent seismic survey
exploration phase. This project report has been prepared for the project proponent, Tullow
Kenya B.V. (TKBV) by Earthview Geoconsultants Ltd. in accordance with the requirements
of Kenyas Environmental Management and Coordination Act of 1999 and subsidiary
legislation, and in fulfilment of the more general requirement that projects maintain a clean,
sustained and healthy environment. This EIA project report has aimed at establishing and
mitigating any potential impacts of the proposed oil and natural gas exploration wells drilling
operations at the identified site in the project area.
Contact:
Mr. Martin Mbogo,
General Manager,
Tullow Kenya B.V.
P.O. Box, 63298-00619,
Nairobi, Kenya.
1
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
TKBV and its development partner, Africa Oil, will engage an internationally experienced oil
and gas well drilling contractor to carry out the drilling operations.
2
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Lorugumu, Kaputir, Katilu and Kalemyang. The area is covered by both mobile and land line
telephone services.
Drilling;
Well and reservoir testing (if necessary);
Demobilisation;
Maintenance of wellhead; and
Decommissioning and abandonment (dependent on the success of the well).
Figure 1.2: Location of the project area of interest (dashed red outline) in Block 13T
The workforce will reside in a base camp that will be constructed by a professional civil and
building contractor with experience in setting up such camps. Issues such as camp security,
provision of basic services (e.g. accommodation, water, sanitation, lighting, and healthcare),
waste management, materials storage areas, etc., shall be incorporated in the camp design.
The camp will be sited away from existing settlements, and its location will be determined in
consultation with the local community leaders and would normally be located adjacent to the
drilling rig. The health and safety of the crew and the general public at large will be ensured
by the company complying both with the relevant national legislation, and its own in-house
5
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
environmental health and safety (EHS) policies, which embrace the international best
practices for such activities. An emergency response plan will be put in place in case of any
accidents or incidents. A close working relationship will be fostered with the local
communities, and as far as is practicable, unskilled and semi-skilled workers are to be
recruited locally.
There are several regulations, guidelines and laws that govern the implementation of such
projects. These laws are outlined in Chapter 4 of this EIA project report. The country is also
a signatory to several treaties and conventions relevant to environmental protection. In
Kenya the body mandated with the regulation of the environment and its sustainability is the
National Environment Management Authority (NEMA).
sufficient mitigation measures, the Authority will require that the proponent undertake an
environmental impact assessment study in accordance with the Regulations.
Role
Qualifica
tions
PhD
Experience
(years)
30
PhD
20
BSc
MSc
BSc
20
6
3
BSc
MSc
10
MSc
BSc
LLB
20
8
25
d) Ensure that concerns and aspirations of the local community are addressed in all
stages of the project cycle;
e) Ensure that the project activities do not in any way interfere with the environmental
sustainability of the area. This is ensured by giving due consideration to:
Rare, endangered and endemic flora and fauna and the ecosystems
in and around the project area;
Local communities and land tenure systems;
Sensitive historical, archaeological and cultural sites.
f) Put in place mitigation and monitoring measures that will ensure that any potential
negative impacts arising from activities of the project are eliminated or reduced at the
earliest opportunity to obviate any harmful effect to the environment;
g) Boost the economy by providing jobs and trading opportunities to the local
community in the region.
Title
Introduction
Contents
Introduction to the project area; identification and activities of
the project proponent in other regions; project background,
objectives and justification; purpose of the EIA and objectives
of the report; the EIA team; TOR for the report.
10
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Project Description
Methodology
Baseline Environmental
Parameters of the Project Area
Environmental Impact
Assessment
Environmental
Plan
Conclusions
Recommendations
References
Referenc
es
Appendi
ces
Management
and
1.
Minutes of meetings
2.
Copies
results
3.
Certificates
4.
5.
of
laboratory
11
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
CHAPTER 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 INTRODUCTION
TKBV is planning to undertake an exploratory drilling project comprising a number of
exploratory wells to verify presence of oil and natural gas in the project area of interest,
which lies within Block 13T. The Block covers Central Pokot, Turkana Central, Loima and
parts of Turkana South districts.
The objective of the project is to check for the presence of hydrocarbons based on the
delineation of potential hydrocarbons traps considered present due to analysis of recently
acquired seismic data. Details provided in this report are on project activities, personnel and
support requirements. Information on various discharges, emissions and waste likely to be
produced from project activities are described as well as management policies put in place
to mitigate any impacts that may arise from them.
The proposed drilling sites, which will measure 450m x 250m, will incorporate: the drilling rig
pad, working area, accommodation facilities, waste management facilities, water reservoir
(120mx130m), kitchen facilities, power generation facilities, a lay-down area for storage of
bulk mud and cement, dry process materials, pipe rack, machinery, and secondary
operations such as welding, painting and machining. The site will also include medical and
emergency response facilities and security personnel quarters.
13
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Derrick
Travelling
block
Swivel
Standpipe
Kelly
Rotary drive
Draw works
Blowout
prevention
equipment
Mud pump
Engines
Mud pit
Drill pipe
Casing
Cement
Drill bit
FUNCTION
An assembly of sheaves or pulleys mounted on beams at the top of the derrick. The drilling
line is run over the sheaves down to the draw works.
A large load-bearing structure, usually bolted construction of metal beams. In drilling, the
standard derrick has four legs standing at the corners of the substructure and reaching to the
crown block. The substructure is an assembly of heavy beams used to elevate the derrick and
provide space underneath to install the blowout preventer, casing head, and other equipment.
An arrangement of pulleys or sheaves which moves up or down in the derrick through which
the drilling cable is strung to the rotary drive
A mechanical device that suspends the weight of the drill pipe, provides for the rotation of the
drill pipe beneath it while keeping the upper portion stationary, and permits the flow of drilling
mud from the standpipe without leaking
A rigid metal conduit that provides the pathway for drilling mud to travel about one-third of the
way up the derrick, where it connects to a flexible hose (kelly` hose), which then connects to
the swivel
The heavy square or hexagonal steel member suspended from the swivel through the rotary
table and connected to the topmost section of drill pipe to turn the drill pipe as the rotary table
turns
The machine used to impart rotational power to the drill string while permitting vertical
movement of the pipe for drilling. Modern rotary machines have a special component, the
rotary or master bushing, to turn the kelly bushing, which permits up and down movement of
the kelly while the drill pipe is turning
The hoisting mechanism on a drilling rig. It is a large winch that spools off or takes in the
drilling cable or line, which raises or lowers the drill pipe and drill bit
The assembly of well control equipment including preventers, spools, valves, and nipples
connected to the top of the wellhead to prevent the uncontrolled escape of oil or gas during
drilling operations.
A large, high-pressure reciprocating pump used to circulate the mud on a drilling rig
Any of various types of power units such as a hydraulic, internal combustion, air, or electric
motor that develops energy or imparts rotary motion that can be used to power other machines
Originally, an open pit dug in the ground to hold drilling mud or waste materials such as well
bore cuttings or mud sediments.
The heavy seamless steel tubing used to rotate the drill bit and circulate the drilling mud. Each
section of drill pipe is about 30 feet long and is fastened together by means of threaded tool
joints
Heavy steel pipe that lines the walls of the hole to prevent the wall of the hole from caving in,
to prevent movement of fluids from one formation to another, and to aid in well control
Used to fill the space between the wall of the hole and the casing. Together with the casing,
this prevents caving of the hole, prevents movement of fluids (water, oil, or gas) between rock
layers, confines production to the well bore, and provides a means to control pressure
The cutting or boring element used in drilling oil and gas wells. Most bits used in rotary drilling
are roller-cone bits. The bit consists of the cutting elements and the circulating element. The
circulating element permits the passage of drilling fluid and uses the hydraulic force of the
drilling mud to improve drilling rates
14
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
The drilling process generally uses drilling bits of different sizes to drill a series of concentric
holes from the surface to the planned well depth. A drilling fluid (drilling mud) is circulated
within the drill string to the bit. The mud that will be used is water based. The primary
function of the drilling mud system is the removal of cuttings from the well and the control of
formation pressures. Other functions of the mud system include sealing permeable
formation; maintaining well bore stability; cooling, lubricating and supporting the drill bit and
assembly; and transmitting hydraulic energy to tools and bit. The drilling fluid is prepared by
on site mixing of mud additives and chemicals to the desired concentrations in water. A well
is drilled in sections, with the diameter of each section decreasing with increasing depth, as
shown in Table 2.2 and Figure 2.2.
Drilling of a well is spudded with a 36" surface hole drilled using water mixed with bentonite,
which is pumped at a very high rate down the drill string to force drill cuttings up the annulus
and out onto the surface. Once drilled, a 30" conductor is cemented into place to ensure
structural integrity of the well. The subsequent sections of the hole are then drilled in a
similar manner before cementing in place a further casing strings. This allows installation of
a wellhead and the necessary equipment.
Once the wellhead and necessary equipment are installed, the subsequent well sections are
drilled with circulating drilling mud and the cuttings returned to the rig for separation of the
mud prior to discharge.
As each section is drilled, a casing is run and cemented into place ready for drilling the next
smaller diameter section. The drill cuttings are returned to the rig with the circulating mud
and passed through a solids control package for separation of the mud from the cuttings.
Table 2.2: Well depths for proposed wells
Hole size (in)
36
26
17
12
7
140
140 to 5000
500 to 1290
1290 to 2200
2200 to 3000
30
20
131/2
9 5/8
7
15
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Figure 2.2: Schematic structure of the proposed casing design of exploration wells
16
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
The activities undertaken during exploratory oil and gas well drilling are as follows:
2.4.3 Rigging-up
The process involves assembling and erecting the drilling tower (derrick/ mast) and
associated equipment. The tower is known as a mast (if tower is part of a tractor-trailer and
is jacked up as a unit) or a derrick (if the tower is constructed on site). The towers,
constructed of structural steel, sit on a flat steel surface called the drill or derrick floor.
Equipment involved is designed for rapid assembly and economy of labour. For this project,
equipment will be transported to the site via trucks and offloaded by winch and skid
techniques by using cranes. Before the rig is assembled, spudding-in of the starter hole will
have been augered.
17
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Auger Drilling
Rotary Drilling
It is the simplest
way to drill and it
creates
shallow
wells in soft beds of
rock. A bit held to a
long steel cable by
an iron rod called a
stem is raised and
dropped repetitively.
The force of the
drop drives the bit
deeper and deeper
into the ground. The
jagged bit crushes
soil and rock and
the drillers must
occasionally pull it
out to pour water in
the opening to flush
it out. The bailer, a
long pipe, takes out
the water and loose
rocks and soil
-Method uses a
helical screw, which
is driven into the
ground with rotation;
the earth is lifted up
the borehole by the
blade of the screw.
-Method commonly
used environmental
drilling, geotechnical
drilling,
soil
engineering
and
geochemistry
reconnaissance
work in exploration
for mineral deposits.
Rotary drilling uses
a sharp, rotating drill
bit to dig down
through the earth's
crust. The basic
rotary drilling system
consists of
four
groups
of
components.
The
ADVANTAGES
DISADVANTAGES
-Low
capital
investment
-Low maintenance
and
operational
costs
-Minimal
crosscontamination
-Water is the only
media required for
cuttings removal
-Large
diameter
holes
can
be
drilled.
18
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
a. Compressed air
drilling
b. Rotary Drilling
with Mud
prime
movers,
hoisting equipment,
rotating equipment,
and
circulating
equipment
all
combine to make
rotary
drilling
possible.
Compressed
air
drilling employs a
rotary drilling rig that
uses air rather than
drilling
mud
to
remove drill cuttings.
The drilling rig and
operations
are
identical to those of
a rotary drilling rig,
except that there is
no
drilling
mud
circulating system.
Instead of mud, air
is pumped down the
drill string and out
the drill bit, forcing
cuttings up and out
of the well bore.
Compressed
air
drilling is typically
used
in
low
permeability
and
porosity
reservoir
intervals where oil or
water
is
not
expected
to
be
encountered during
drilling. If (or when)
natural
gas
is
encountered during
drilling, the gas may
be safely combusted
at the drill site using
a flaring device over
a waste containment
pit.
Bentonite
and
synthetic stabilizers
are mixed with water
and circulated in the
borehole.
The
resultant
fluid
commonly referred
-Faster
rate
of
penetration (R.O.P)
(2-5 times faster
than on Mud)
-Improved deviation
control (light WOB)
-Minimal formation
damage
in
Production section
-Effective Pressure
Control
through
Lost
Circulation
Zones
-Detection of Low
Pressure Zones
-Faster return of
drilled
cuttings
(formation
evaluation)
-Overall Lower Cost
per Foot
-Hole penetration is
very fast in some
clay, sand and
shale formations
-No
temporary
casing is required
-Fluid pressure in
to as mud or drilling
mud, is used to cake
and stabilize the
borehole wall. The
mass of the fluid
also
provides
pressure in the hole,
which helps to keep
it open.
Requires
a
fundamental knowledge
of
bentonite
and
additives needed to
achieve
adequate
penetration rates and
stabilize formations
-More difficult to identify
water bearing zones,
especially in low flow
formations
-Loss
of
circulation
zones can cause aquifer
contamination
and
dramatically
increase
bentonite costs
-Mud may plug the
aquifer
and
cause
decreased production
-Driller still bears the risk
of hole collapse or swell,
resulting in possible loss
of drill string or jamming
of
casing
during
installation
-Disposal of mud after
hole is completed can
be inconvenient and
costly
-Freezing temperatures
make working with mud
more difficult
-Foam
has
excellent cuttings
carrying capacity.
-During
connections (break
in circulation) the
cuttings will remain
suspended in the
annulus.
-Holding
Back
Pressure
on
Annulus can help
reduce water influx
and/or
maintain
hole-wall stability.
-Surface requirements
(pits) for Foam can
become a problem.
-Large pits have to be
built to contain the Foam
and allow time for
settling.
-Chemical cost to break
down Foam can become
expensive.
-Large influx of Fluids
can break down Foam
and thus reduce hole
cleaning
Foam
drilling is
similar to air drilling
but
mixes
detergents with the
air and a small
volume of water to
form foam that is
better at removing
cuttings and water
from the well.
20
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
The rotary drilling with mud method will be used for the project. The well will be straight hole
/ vertical since the selected project sites are sparsely populated and are not built up which
would call for the use of directional/slant/ horizontal drilling. It is also the most efficient and
cost-effective manner in which to reach the sub-surface targets.
There are two commonly used types of logging, which are: sample and wireline. Sample
logging consists of examining and recording the physical aspects of the rock penetrated by a
well by analysing the cuttings returned to the surface by the circulating system. Wireline
logging consists of lowering a device used to measure the electrical, acoustic, or radiological
properties of the rock layers into the down-hole portion of the well to provide an estimate of
the fluid content and characteristics of the various rock layers through which the well passes.
21
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
The well testing objectives will include: establishing productivity of the identified reservoir
unit(s); production interference test to assess connectivity of the formations; calibration of
sub-surface static and dynamic models; determination of flow barriers/discontinuities, if any;
determination of near well-bore properties such as permeability and skin; collection of
representative dead oil samples for flow assurance and assay studies; and evaluation of
ESP performance. Where well-testing is to occur this will generally not exceed 5 days; welltest fluids will be flared. Produced water will be cleaned to the required standard and
discharged offsite.
2.4.8 Flaring
Flaring is the controlled burning of hydrocarbons during a well test. This burning occurs at
the end of a flare stack. Flaring disposes of the gas and oil and releases greenhouse gases
in to the atmosphere. Flare systems are used throughout the petroleum industry around the
world during well testing.
After testing, which includes separating the oil and gas (see section 2.4.7), the hydrocarbons
will be sent to the burner boom for disposal by flaring, as this is the only practical handling
option for these hydrocarbons. Flaring may be initiated using diesel to ignite the mixture and
to give a clean burn. It is intended to use a high efficiency burner to flare the oil during well
testing and minimise as far as practical the release of un-burnt hydrocarbons.
A flare is normally visible and generates both noise and heat. During flaring, the burned gas
and oil generates mainly water vapour and carbon dioxide. Efficient combustion of the flame
depends on achieving good mixing between oil and compressed air from a compressor. The
gas will give a clean burn because the heavy-ends will be in the oil phase due to separation
in the separator.
Viscosifiers
Filtrate reducers
Function
Increase density (weight) of
mud, balancing formation
pressure, preventing a
blowout
Increase viscosity of mud to
suspend cuttings and
weighting agent in mud
Deflocculate clays to optimize
viscosity and gel strength of
mud
Increase viscosity and gel
strength of clays or clarify or
de-water low solids mud.
Decrease fluid loss to the
formation through the filter
Typical Chemicals
Barite, hematite, calcite, ilmenite
Alkalinity, pH control
additives
Lubricants
Shale control materials
Bactericides
Defoamers
Pipe-freeing agents
Calcium reducers
Corrosion inhibitors
WBM is pumped from the mud tanks on the pad down the hollow drill pipe and exits the drill
string through holes in the drill bit. It sweeps cuttings from the drill bit up the space between
the drill string and the wall of the well (the annulus) to the platform deck. The mud/cuttings
mixture is passed through separation equipment that separates the cuttings from the drilling
mud, which is returned to the mud tanks for recirculation down-hole.
When drill cuttings and drilling mud reach the surface during drilling, they are separated by
means of Solids Control Equipment (SCE), whose function is to recover useful mud, so it
can be re-circulated into the hole. There are several technologies used to remove the solids
from the drilling mud.
The separation of WBM and cuttings is mainly based on particle size and relies on shale
shakers, hydrocyclones, and a decanting centrifuge.
24
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Figure 2.3: illustrates various waste separation stages based on particle sizes (Adapted from
Neff, J. M. 2005)
Most cuttings are sand/gravel-sized and are easily recovered on the shale shaker, while siltand clay- sized cuttings are separated from the barite and bentonite of WBM by use of
hydrocyclones and centrifuges due to their sizes. Proper disposal of cuttings and waste
fluids has been discussed under waste management.
2.6
WATER SUPPLY
The project area of interest lacks a quality assured water supply network and the water
available is sourced from shallow wells, shallow to deep boreholes (at Katilu and Kasuroi),
rivers (Turkwel) and luggas. Low and unpredictable rainfall has resulted in scarcity of water
in the area. Water will be required for potable use, domestic use and drilling use. TKBV
constructed a borehole in Nakukulas area for use in Ngamia 1 drilling operations and it has
been proposed that the borehole will supply water to Twiga 1, one of the proposed well sites,
that is not far from the area. Drilling will require a lot of water; therefore, TKBV will drill water
boreholes at/close to the drilling sites to be the main source of water for the drilling
operations. Quality levels for the water will not be critical so long as water is not too saline.
Any unforeseen water shortages can be met by having a contingency plan to truck in from
other sources water that can be stored on site and used when required.
25
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
2.7
Drilling of exploratory wells is the only sure way of confirming the presence of hydrocarbons
in an identified promising geological structure. During the drilling program, huge quantities of
solid (mainly crushed rocks) and liquid (sludge) waste are generated in addition to noise and
air emissions. Therefore, the proposed exploratory drilling operation will likely result in the
generation of solid waste, liquid waste, noise and air emissions.
2.7.1 Emissions
a) Air Emissions
Air emissions will arise from both direct and indirect sources: Direct emission sources will
include rig power generation, vehicles and machinery, and flaring (burning of crude and gas)
during well testing (if undertaken). Indirect emissions will include fugitive emissions such as
chemical leaks, increased vehicle traffic, manufacturing emissions (necessary mud,
chemicals, machinery, etc.).
The principal atmospheric emissions from these sources normally include carbon dioxide
(CO2), methane (CH4), oxides of nitrogen (NOX), sulphur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide
(CO) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). CO2 and CH4 are classified as two of the
principal greenhouse gases (GHGs) (see table below).
Table 2.5: Summarises the environmental impacts of different atmospheric releases:
Type of emission
Environmental Impact
maintenance practices, by following operational controls for the loading and unloading of
materials and by maintaining good housekeeping on the rig.
To minimise unnecessary emission generation, the proponent will ensure that there is
extensive pre-planning to ensure that the required equipment, materials and personnel are
available at the right location and at the correct time.
b) Noise emissions
The drilling rig will produce low-frequency noise which will originate from the top drive, drawworks, shale shakers, mud pumps, generators, trucks, forklifts, pipe handling, among others.
2.7.2 Wastes
In Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, the term waste can be defined as any
unavoidable material resulting from an up-stream operation for which there is no economic
demand and which must be disposed of (Bashat, 2003).
a) Types of wastes
During the exploratory well drilling, several types of wastes will be generated, namely:
domestic waste from offices and accommodation area; special waste which is hazardous to
health and/or the environment; and industrial waste generated during petroleum activities
and which is neither domestic nor special. The waste can be categorised into two main
groups, i.e., operational wastes and domestic wastes. Table 2.6 shows the common wastes
and their environmentally significant constituents.
27
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Table 2.6: Shows the common wastes and their environmentally significant constituents.
CATEGORY
TYPE OF WASTE
Domestic sewage
Domestic
Domestic refuse
Drainage
Process water
Gases
MAIN WASTE
COMPONENT
Biodegradable organic
matter
Packing materials, cleaning
materials, garbage, garden
leftovers, kitchen waste
Rain water
Engine cooling water, brake
cooling water, wash water
POSSIBLE
ENVIRONMENTALLY
SIGNIFACNT
CONSITITUENTS
BOD, solids, detergents,
coliform bacteria
Plastics, glass, organic waste
Hydrocarbons
Hydrocarbons, Detergents
Vent gases
Flare gases
Vapours
Hydrocarbons
Fugitive gases
Cement slurries
Cement mix
Spent / contaminated
water-based mud
Spent specialty
products
H2S Scavengers
Defoamers
Fire-fighting agents
Operational
Waste lubricants
Spacers
Tracers
Industrial refuse
Energy sources
28
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Refrigerants
CFCs
Clean-up process
equipment
Industrial refuse
29
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Surface discharge
Injection
Biotreatment methods
Solidification,
Encapsulation
stabilisation
and
Landfills
Solvent extraction
The method of choice for drilling waste management will be physical separation via screens/
shale shakers to remove large particles, and passing through a rotary bowl-decanting
centrifuge to remove fine solid particles. Cleaned cuttings will be combined with subsoil and
placed in trenches beneath the topsoil layer. Drilling mud cleaned of cuttings will be pumped
back into the mud tanks for recirculation and reuse. Due to the scarcity of water in the
project area and compliance with environmental/ resource sustainability, water utilized in the
drilling process will be treated and recycled.
30
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
2.8 DECOMMISSIONING/ABANDONMENT
2.8.1 General activities
The proposed exploratory drilling programme will run for a short duration (approximately 120
days). Upon completion of the drilling and testing, the rig will be decommissioned and
mobilised to another well site, then site decommissioning and restoration will be undertaken.
The following are some of the activities involved in decommissioning:
2.9
A TKBV Oil Spill Contingency Plan shall be applied to the proposed drilling project. The
contingency plan shall be based on the location and volume of potential spill and shall
address the possibilities of well blowouts in the drilling emergency plan. The spill
contingency plan shall clearly identify the actions necessary in the event of an oil spill,
including communication network, the individual responsible for key personnel and the
procedure for reporting to the authorities and arranging the logistics of extra labour needed
for the clean-up exercise. Finally, the plan should also address the disposal procedure of
contaminated wastes generated by a spill.
31
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Plate 2.1: Shows on-going works at one of the proposed drilling sites a) Installation of septic
systems and b) grease traps.
Grease traps will be installed along the drains leading away from the kitchen area. The
grease will be collected and stored in drums for disposal in accordance with the waste
management plan.
In addition, there will be a BIOBOX type system, an onsite total waste recycling kit / system,
to recycle a mix of grey water from showers, kitchens and laundry and black water from
toilets to produce clear odourless and environmentally safe water.
Appropriate medical and transport facilities will be on site in the event of a medical
emergency that would require immediate evacuation of personnel and a Medivac procedure
will be in place.
32
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
CHAPTER 3:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
3.1 APPROACH TAKEN FOR THE EIA
The approach taken for the EIA with respect to the proposed exploratory oil and gas wells
drilling included the following:
1. Scaling and work evaluation (determination of geographical and other boundaries;
preliminary assessment);
2. Detailed assessment based on: project design and technologies vis--vis environment,
social, cultural and economic considerations of the project area; evaluation of preexisting environmental, social, cultural and economic conditions, pressures and impacts;
identification and evaluation of potential environmental, social, cultural and economic
impacts that may arise from the proposed project; public consultations to explain what
the proposed project is all about and to receive their views, perceptions, concerns and
local expert knowledge and advice with respect to the proposed project;
3. Determination/evaluation of the significance of the potential project impacts and
recommendation of mitigation measures;
4. Development of an Environmental Management Plan and Monitoring Programme; and
decommissioning of the project; and
5. Preparation of the EIA Project Report.
Issues Considered
Rationale
Spatial Scope
Project Design,
Technologies,
Scale and
Extent
Project
components
Equipment and
machinery used
Personnel required
Facilities required
Management of
fluid and solid
wastes
Occupational and
public health and
safety
Supplies
Decommissioning
Project components
equipment/ machinery
used, and facilities will
have a number of
environmental impacts
related to construction,
operations and
decommissioning
Identification and
prioritisation of factors
requiring mitigation
Personnel and public
safety during operations
needs to be ensured
Proposed
drilling sites
Access roads
Selected camp
sites, storage,
repair and
waste disposal
and facilities
Legislative and
Regulatory
Framework
Legislation and
regulations
applicable to
project design,
execution, affected
National
legislation and
regulations and
authorities
responsible
Limitations of
Methodology and
Consequences
for the Study
Outcomes
None
None
33
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
parties, and
environmental
protection
Geographical
Aspects and
Boundaries
Administrative
set-up
Description of the
setting of the
project area
Identification of key
features
Key administrative
units and their
roles in the project
area
Communication
and Transport
Road infrastructure
Air transport
network
Land, radio and
mobile
communications
network
Governmental,
NonGovernmental
and
CommunityBased
Organisations
Physiography
and Geology
Activities and
projects carried out
in the area
Soils
Physiography and
geology
Assessment of
terrain ruggedness
Assessment of
susceptibility to
landslides,
earthquakes,
subsidence and
floods
Active surface
processes
Soil condition
Areas subject to
wind and water
erosion
Soil texture and
drainage
characteristics
Soil chemical
quality
Assessment of
rehabilitation
International
best practices
in Oil and Gas
industry
Company
EHS, CSR and
Code of
Conduct
Project area
None
Project area
None
Project area
None
Project area
None
Establishment of baseline
conditions
Identification of potentially
difficult areas to work in
terrain and accessibility by
vehicles
Identification of areas
requiring extra safety
precautions
Identification of hazardprone areas
Project area
Samples
collected are
representative of
project area
Project area
Mapping unit A8
was observed
and field
information
collected but not
sampled since
sufficient data
exists in
literature and as
reported in
previous EIA
document. All
34
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
potential
Climate
Temperature
Winds
Precipitation
Climate change
Air Quality
Surface and
Groundwater
Resources
other areas,
within the project
mandate, had
representative
samples
collected and
assessed.
No data
available for
trend analysis.
Establishment of baseline
conditions
Information useful for
project elements such as
cooling of temperaturesensitive equipment and
installations
Personnel safety from
adverse weather and
related conditions e.g.
flooding
Establishment of baseline
conditions
Assessment of project
impacts on air quality
Identification and
prioritisation of factors
requiring mitigation
Access roads
Selected camp
sites and rig
and facilities
Ground and
surface water
sources
Ground and
surface water use
Planned water use
Changes in
quantity
Identification of
project
components that
can affect water
use
Establishment of baseline
conditions
Potentially high demand for
water by project group in a
water scarce region
Planned water uses that
affect water quantity may
be blamed on the project
proponent
Identification and
prioritisation of factors
requiring mitigation
Selected camp
sites and
exploratory
well drilling
sites and
facilities
Water Quality
Current ground
and surface water
quantity
Current point and
non-point sources
of water pollution
Identification of
project
components that
can potentially
alter water quality
Establishment of baseline
conditions
Assessment of project
impacts (e.g. effluent
disposal and accidental
spills) on water quality
Domestic effluent
discharges
Identification and
prioritisation of factors
requiring mitigation
Selected camp
sites and
exploratory
well drilling
sites and
facilities
Representative
water samples
were taken.
Terrestrial
Vegetation cover
Establishment of baseline
Project area
Access roads
Selected camp
sites and rig
facilities
Lack of air
quality data on
particulate
loading, SOx and
NOx or any other
gaseous
compounds in
the area. Area is,
however, rural
and undeveloped
so air quality can
be assumed to
be good and
varies mainly
due to variations
in wind speeds
(natural
particulate
loading).
Inaccessibility of
some areas due
lack of roads
and security
concerns
35
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Environment
(Habitats, Flora
and Fauna)
and classes
Habitat conditions
Floral and faunal
communities which
are uncommon,
threatened or
endangered
Environmentally
sensitive localities
Wildlife corridors
Pastoral areas
Assessment of
ecosystem state
Land
Resources and
National Parks
Archaeological,
Historical and
Cultural Sites
Identification of
archaeological,
historical, cultural
sites
Visual
Aesthetics
Noise and
Vibrations
Solid and
Liquid Wastes
Social
Characteristics
conditions
Physical disturbance of
terrestrial environment
during operations, such as
pit excavations, campsite
construction and drilling rig
operation
Determination of preproject endangered
communities
Assessment of areas
requiring special
precautions
Avoidance of humanhuman and human-wildlife
conflicts
Identification and
prioritisation of factors
requiring mitigation
The land resources are
critical resources
supporting livelihoods in
the area.
Consideration of competing
resources
ecosystem
structures are
resilient to the
effects of land
degradation and
deforestation.
Land cover, for
example, has
become patchier,
but the species
diversity within
the various
ecotones remain
the same.
Project area
None
Establishment of currently
known sites
Avoidance of such sites
during the drilling operation
Project area
None
Aesthetic or high
scenic value
Establishment of baseline
conditions
Assessment of project
impacts such as vegetation
clearance along cut lines
and at campsites
Proposed
drilling sites
Access roads
Selected camp
site and rig
facilities
None
Establishment of baseline
conditions
Noise and vibrations
impacts on the project
workforce and the
neighbouring public
Impacts on nearby
structures and facilities
Proposed
drilling sites
Access roads
Selected camp
site and rig
facilities
Lack of studies
on noise and
vibration impacts
on fauna
Establishment of baseline
conditions
Campsites will require to
install waste discharge
systems
Campsites
Working areas
None
Level of services
available
Social support
information
Identification of key
Project area
Language barrier
in some places
Reluctance to
adopt new social
practises
36
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Economic
Setting
Health Setting
Security and
Public Safety
Public
Consultations
Corporate
Social
Responsibility
Mitigation
Measures
Environmental
Management
Plan
community needs
Area targeted for
growth
Labour and
employment
Status of health
facilities
Access to health
services
Occupational
health and safety
hazards
Hazards due to the
use, storage,
disposal or
transportation of
flammable,
explosive or toxic,
substances
Emission of
electromagnetic or
other radiation
which may
adversely affect
electronic
equipment or
human health
Traffic hazards
Public risks
Crime
Conflicts over
resources
Fires
Awareness
creation on the
project
Environmental
pressures in the
area
Expert and
indigenous
knowledge of the
area
Community
prioritisation of
areas/projects for
possible CSR
assistance
Mitigation hierarchy
Effective
mitigations
specified for the
topics addressed
Costs
Responsibility
Management
Project area
Unwillingness by
locals to adopt
new economic
opportunities
Project area
and the
surrounding
environment
Inaccessibility of
some areas
Project area
and the
surroundings
Involvement of all
stakeholders
Information gathering on
environmental issues and
concerns in the project
area
Acceptability of the project
Project area
and
surrounding
environment
Project area
High and
sometimes
unrealistic
expectations
Avoiding or reducing at
source
Abating on-site
Abating off-site
Repair or remedy
Compensate for loss or
damage
Least possible interference
with the environment
Compliance with principles,
policies and legislation
relating to conservation of
environment
Decommissioning of
Proposed
drilling site
Access roads
Selected camp
sites and
facilities
None
Proposed
drilling site
Access roads
Selected camp
sites and
facilities
None
37
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Environmental
Monitoring Plan
Relevant legislation
and regulations
Decommissioning
Parameters to be
monitored
Personnel required
Training needs
campsites
Ease of monitoring
Effectiveness of monitoring
method
Cost of monitoring
Frequency
Proposed
drilling site
Access roads
Selected camp
sites and
facilities
None
38
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
3.4.3 Soils
Primary soil data was obtained using the exploratory soil and agro-climatic zone map and
report of Kenya (Sombroek et al 1982) and the National Oil Corporation of Kenya oil blocks
map for boundary delineation. TKBV provided the geographical locations of the study area
which were superimposed in existing base maps. The scale used for maps in this report was
1:50,000. Field data was collected through visual observation of soil units and profile pits
descriptions. Profile pits descriptions assisted in classification of the soil units. Parameters
assessed included soil texture, colour, structure, porosity, root distribution, drainage and soil
depth. Surface conditions like stones and rock outcrops, meso-relief like presence of dunes,
and micro-relief like presence of rills were also assessed. The surface physical
characteristics were described to determine wind and soil-water erosion hazards, flooding,
ponding and water-logging potential and accessibility of the units by equipment and vehicles.
Also assessed was the rehabilitation potential of some units due to presence of salts.
Surface-water infiltration tests were carried out using the double ring infiltration method. A
GPS was used to geo-reference the sampling points. Soil samples were collected for survey,
fertility, and soil moisture characteristics laboratory determination. Desktop work included
soil map compilation and correlation to assign soil boundaries and harmonize the soil
legend.
3.4.4 Climate
Wind and precipitation data was obtained from published literature and reports. In addition,
wind data was supplemented by visual observations in the field.
of the exploratory oil and gas wells drilling project on the existing ecosystems, flora, and
fauna. Field guidebooks were used in helping to confirm identified species. Habitats and
animal encounters of interest were recorded, and photographs of species of mammals,
birds, reptiles, amphibians and arthropods present at the time of observation were taken.
40
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
To inform the local people and their leaders about the proposed drilling of
exploratory wells and the objectives of the proposed project.
To gather the concerns and views of the local people and their leaders on the
proposed project.
To establish if the local people foresee any positive and/or negative impacts
associated with the proposed exploratory wells drilling project, and suggest
possible ways of mitigating negative impacts and enhancing positive impacts
arising from it.
To identify and document the diverse socio-cultural and economic set-ups in the
project area that could be potentially impacted by the project activities.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
DISTRICTS
TURKANA
SOUTH
TURKANA
SOUTH
TURKANA
SOUTH
TURKANA
SOUTH
TURKANA
SOUTH
TURKANA
SOUTH
Other social and economic aspects relating to the project area, including livelihoods and
cultures, education and health, among others, were also assessed. The methodologies
employed include review of available literature, public meetings and consultation with local
residents and their leaders as well as and administration of formal questionnaires and
interviews with interested parties and at household level.
Extent
(predicted scale of
impact)
Duration
(predicted lifetime of
impact)
RATING SCALES
Negligible
Low - where the impact affects the environment in such a way that natural,
cultural and social functions and processes are minimally affected
Medium - where the affected environment is altered but natural, cultural and
social functions and processes continue albeit in a modified way; and valued,
important, sensitive or vulnerable systems or communities are negatively
affected
High - where natural, cultural or social functions and processes are altered to
the extent that it will temporarily or permanently cease; and valued, important,
sensitive or vulnerable systems or communities are substantially affected.
Site-specific
Local (immediate surrounding areas)
Regional
National
Short-term - 0 to 5 years
Medium term - 6 to 15 years
Long term - 16 to 30 years - where the impact will cease after the operational
life of the activity either because of natural processes or by human
intervention
42
CRITERIA
Probability
(likelihood of impact
occurring)
Status of impact
Degree of
confidence
(specialists level of
confidence in
predictions +/or
information on which
it is based)
RATING SCALES
Permanent - where mitigation either by natural process or human intervention
will not occur in such a way or in such a time span that the impact can be
considered transient.
Improbable where the possibility of the impact materialising is very low.
Probable where there is a good possibility (<50% chance) that the impact
will occur.
Highly probable where it is most likely (50-90% chance) that the impact will
occur.
Definite where the impact will occur regardless of any prevention measures
(>90% chance of occurring).
Positive - a benefit
Negative - a cost
Neutral
Low
Medium
High
CHAPTER 4
POLICY, LEGAL, AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
4.1 THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA, 2010
The Constitution provides that every person has the right to a clean and healthy environment
(Article 42). The State is obliged to ensure that the environment and natural resources are
conserved and genetic resources and biological diversity are protected. In that regard it must
eliminate any processes or activities that would be likely to endanger the environment.
Everyone is expected to cooperate with the State organs and other people to protect and
conserve the environment and ensure that the use and development of the natural resources
are ecologically sustainable (Article 69). These environmental rights are enforceable in a
court of law (Article 70). Land must be used in a sustainable manner, and in accordance with
the principles of sound conservation and protection of ecologically sensitive areas. The State
may regulate the use of any land or right over any land in the interest of land use planning
(Article 66).
The Constitution of Kenya gives recognition to public, community and private land. Land use
regulation goes beyond exploitation merely for economic purposes, and lays emphasis on
conservation. It is required that wildlife conservation promotes sustainable development
which includes both environmental conservation and economic development. Parliament has
five years from the date of promulgation to enact legislation to give full effect to the
provisions relating to the environment. Community land vests in communities identified on
the basis of ethnicity, culture, or other similar common interest. Apart from land registered or
transferred, it consists of land that is lawfully held, managed or used by specific communities
as grazing areas or shrines, and ancestral lands (Articles 60 72). The State is generally
mandated to regulate the use of any land in the public interest. Public land is described as
including: all minerals and mineral oils; specified government forests; government game
reserves; water catchment areas; national parks; government animal sanctuaries; specially
protected areas; and all rivers, lakes and other water bodies as defined by law. However,
land on which mineral and mineral oils exist is held by the national government in trust for
the Kenyan people (Article 62).
authority.
It outlines the following principles, goals and objectives:
Principles
a) Environmental protection is an integral part of sustainable development.
b) The environment and its natural resources can meet the needs of present as well as
those of future generations if used sustainably.
c) All the people have the right to benefit equally from the use of natural resources as well
as an equal entitlement to a clean and healthy environment.
d) Poverty reduction is an indispensable requirement for sustainable development.
e) Sustainable development and a higher quality of life can be achieved by reducing or
eliminating unsustainable practices of production and consumption, and by promoting
appropriate demographic policies.
f) Endogenous capacity building is essential for development, adaptation, diffusion, and
transfer of technologies for sustainable development.
g) Indigenous/traditional knowledge and skills are vital in environmental management and
sustainable development.
h) Effective public participation is enhanced by access to information concerning the
environment and the opportunity to participate in decision-making processes.
i) Public participation including women and youth is essential in proper environmental
management.
j) For sustainable management, the polluter pays principle should apply.
k) Access to judicial and administrative proceedings, including redress and remedy, is
essential to environmental conservation and management.
l) Private sector participation in environmental management is essential for sustainable
development.
m) Effective measures should be taken to prevent any threats of damage to the
environment, notwithstanding lack of full scientific certainty.
n) Peace, security, development, and environmental protection are interdependent and
indivisible.
o) International co-operation and collaboration is essential in the management of
environmental resources shared by two or more states.
Overall Goal
The overall goal is to integrate environmental concerns into the national planning and
management processes and provide guidelines for environmentally sustainable
development.
Specific Goals
a) To incorporate environmental management and economic development as integral
aspects of the process of sustainable development.
b) To promote maintenance of a quality environment that permits a life of dignity and
well- being for all.
c) To encourage sustainable use of resources and ecosystems for the benefit of the
present generations, while ensuring their potential to meet the needs of future
generations.
d) To promote maintenance of ecosystems and ecological processes essential for the
functioning of the biosphere.
e) To promote the preservation of genetic resources, biological diversity, their cultural
values and their natural heritage.
f) To incorporate indigenous knowledge, skills, and interests for effective participation
45
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
healthcare package. To operationalise this Health Policy Framework Paper, the National
Health Sector Strategic Plan (NHSSP, 1999-2004) was developed in 1994. The strategic
plan emphasized the decentralisation of healthcare delivery through redistribution of health
services to rural areas. The plan is currently being revised to reflect the Poverty Reduction
Strategy Paper (2001-2004) agenda. The new plan focuses on the essential key priority
packages based on the burden of disease and the required support systems to deliver these
services to the Kenyans. The ensuing NHSSP II (2005 2010) was intended to keep people
well and to promote the involvement of communities in their own healthcare. Major players in
the health sector include the government represented by the Ministry of Health and the Local
Government, private sector and non-governmental organisations (NGOs). The organisation
of Kenyas healthcare delivery system revolves around three levels, namely the MoH
headquarters, the provinces and the districts. The headquarter sets policies, coordinates the
activities of NGOs and manages, monitors and evaluates policy formulation and
implementation. The provincial tier acts as an intermediary between the central ministry and
the districts. It oversees the implementation of health policy at the district level, maintains
quality standards and coordinates and controls all district health activities. In addition, it
monitors and supervises district health management boards (DHMBS), which supervise the
operations of health activities at the district level.
The Strategy, which has commanded a great deal of attention in recent years, essentially
subsumes the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP).
creation opportunities for the poor, infrastructure, energy, science, technology and
innovation, land reform, human resources development, security, as well as public sector
reforms.
The foundations for the Vision are:
a) Macroeconomic Stability for Long-term Development: The Vision places the highest
premium on Kenyas current stable macroeconomic environment which works in favour
of the poor, and expects it to continue in the future as a matter of policy. The projects
proposed under Vision 2030 will be subjected to the parameters set under the
macroeconomic stability framework.
b) Continuity in Governance Reforms: These will be accelerated in order to create a
more conducive environment for doing business, and also to enable Kenyans to fully
enjoy their individual rights under the Constitution. Towards this end, the government will
intensify the anti-corruption programme through more efficient investigation and
prosecution; eliminating bribery in the public service and increasing public education and
judicial and legal reform. The government will also fully support the people of Kenya,
parliament, civil society and the press, recognising that they are the ultimate defence
against abuse of office.
c) Infrastructure: The Vision aspires for a country firmly interconnected through a network
of roads, railways, ports, airports, water and sanitation facilities and telecommunications.
This is a high priority issue.
d) Enhanced Equity and Wealth-Creation Opportunities for the Poor: The
Vision
includes equity as a recurrent principle in economic, social and political programmes.
Special attention has been given to arid and semi-arid districts, communities with high
incidence of poverty, the unemployed youth, women, and all vulnerable groups.
e) Science, Technology and Innovation (STI): The government will intensify the
application of STI to increase productivity and efficiency levels across all three pillars. It
recognises the critical role played by research and development in accelerating
development in the emerging nations. The government will create and implement an STI
policy framework to support Vision 2030.
f) Land Reform: Land is a vital resource for the socio-economic and political developments
set out in the Vision. It is recognized that respect for property rights to land, whether
owned by individuals, communities or companies, is key to rapid economic growth (A
national land use policy has now been created to enable this growth) (section 4.2.4).
g) Human Resources Development: Kenya will create a globally competitive and adaptive
human resource base to meet the needs of a rapidly industrializing economy through
training and education, raising labour productivity to international levels, creating a
human resource database to facilitate better planning, and establish more training
institutions.
h) Security: The government will increase security in order to lower the cost of doing
business and provide Kenyans with a more secure environment to live and work in. The
strategies will include improving community policing, reducing the police-to-population
ratio, and adopting information and communication technology in crime detection and
prevention. These measures will be supported by judicial reforms.
i)
Energy: Since development projects recommended under Vision 2030 will increase
demand on Kenyas energy supply, she must generate more energy at a lower cost and
increase efficiency in energy consumption. The government is committed to continued
institutional reforms in the energy sector, including a strong, regulatory framework, and
will encourage more power generation by the private sector. New sources of energy will
49
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
be found through the exploitation of geothermal power, coal, and renewable energy
sources.
j) The Public Sector: An efficient, motivated and well-trained public service is expected to
be one of the major foundations of the Vision. Kenya intends to build a public service that
is more citizen-focused and results-oriented. The government will intensify efforts to
bring about an attitudinal change in public service that value transparency and
accountability to the citizens of Kenya.
Contractor here means the individual(s) or company undertaking the work or project.
50
blasting may endanger life or property. The use or transport of explosives, in the working of
a mine, quarry, excavation or other project is forbidden, unless an explosives manager has
been appointed and the inspector notified in writing. The explosives manager is responsible
for the safety and security of all explosives used, transported or stored, until they are handed
to the blaster for use. He is also responsible for the safety of every person who may be
employed on the project, whether under his direct supervision or not (sections 6, 7, 11, 13).
This statute relates to the safety of the project workers in the workplace and the security of
property, and covers developmental activities that may result in adverse effects on the
environment.
51
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
52
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
unwholesome matter or thing into or near any water resource in such a way as to cause or
be likely to cause pollution of the water resource (Sections 12, 44 and 94).
This relates to waste generation solids, effluents and oils at camp and work areas and its
safe discharge.
development, dump site, sewerage treatment plant, quarry or other development activity will
impact on the environment adversely, it will require the applicant to submit an environmental
impact assessment report for consideration (Section 36).
This covers all development activities that may result in adverse effects on the environment,
particularly the generation of waste and the method of its discharge.
areas that are within public lands, and demarcate or take any action on those areas to
prevent environmental degradation and climate change. The Commission may make rules
and regulations for sustainably conserving land-based natural resources. These may
include: measures to protect critical ecosystems and habitats; incentives for communities
and individuals to invest in natural resource conservation programmes that generate income;
measures to facilitate the access, use and co-management of forests, water and other
resources by communities who hold customary rights to them; procedures on involving
stakeholders in managing and utilizing land-based natural resources; and measures to
ensure benefit-sharing for the affected communities. Disputes arising from matters provided
for under this law may be referred to the Land and Environment Court, which has exclusive
jurisdiction to handle them under this statute (Sections 11, 19, 128, 150).
This relates to the projects compliance with the laws and regulations regarding the
protection of the environment generally.
124).The law does not permit anyone to deposit any substance in a lake, river or wetland or
in, on or under its bed, if that substance is likely to cause adverse environmental effects.
NEMA may prescribe measures to ensure that the biological resources in place are
preserved, issue guidelines to promote the conservation of the various terrestrial and aquatic
systems, and protect species, ecosystems and habitats threatened with extinction. Any area
of land, lake or river may be declared a protected natural environment in order to promote
and preserve specific ecological processes, natural environment systems or species of
indigenous wildlife. It is an offence to discharge pollutants into the aquatic environment. No
one is permitted to discharge any hazardous substance, chemical, oil or mixture containing
any oil into any waters or any other parts of the environment. Noise must not be emitted in
excess of the laid-down standards (Sections 42, 43, 51, 54, 71, 72, 93, 102, 108).
This statute regulates all the activities of projects that may have adverse environmental
impacts.
56
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
riverbanks in accordance with the Public Health Act, Cap. 342 (Regulations 4, 5, 8, 11, 16,
17, 22, 24).
This relates to interference with oases and their ecological structure and function, grazing
and other economic activities close to the project area, as well as visual aesthetics and
interference with the natural heritage.
58
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
It is vital to have a senior management committed to ensuring that the management system
is developed and maintained, and that the companys policy and strategic objectives are
achieved. Management should ensure that the policy requirements are adhered to during
operations and support local initiatives to protect health, safety and the environment.
Management commitment will involve delegating responsibility, providing resources and
motivation, and ensuring participation and open communication.
59
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
2.
The HSE management system requires that the companys policies and strategic objectives
are well defined and documented. The policies must be relevant and consistent and should
be on a par with other company policies and objectives. Here also, commitment to carrying
out the companys policies towards protecting peoples health and safety as well as the
environment, is vital, as are responses to community concerns. Partnerships with
stakeholders are just as essential. Where relevant legislation and regulations do not exist,
the company must commit to apply responsible standards.
3.
Procedures must be in place to identify on a regular basis the dangers and effects of the
undertaking. This identification should apply to all the activities from the start to the
decommissioning of the project. Environmental impact assessment study becomes a
suitable criterion to gauge what is acceptable, particularly in the absence of appropriate
legislative control.
5.
Planning
Environmental planning and compliance programmes should include ways and means of
preventing or minimizing adverse impacts, as well as enhancing the beneficial impacts that
may accrue. It is also imperative that internal standards and targets are set for compliance.
A detailed decommissioning plan should be considered in the initial planning of the project,
and a plan to restore the environment should be developed before the end of the project.
6.
The purpose of monitoring is to ensure that the results forecast at the planning stage are
being achieved, and where the contrary is the case, to identify the cause and take action to
correct the situation. Managers must strictly adhere to legal and statutory requirements and
controls as well as the companys own commitment to responsible management of the
environment. Monitoring will indicate whether or not commitments and compliance with legal
and corporate requirements are being met. It also provides the basis for audit.
7.
This management tool enables the senior management to regularly assess its performance,
effectiveness and suitability. It also provides an opportunity to obtain feedback on the
effectiveness of the organization and its environmental performance. In addition, it is useful
60
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
in verifying compliance with monitoring programmes and ensuring that plans, procedures
and standards are working effectively.
Other renowned national and international standards for best practice, particularly the ISO
9000 and 14000 series, also offer management systems models that can be used by
companies to enhance their environmental performance.
61
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Entry into
force
16 June,
1969
Date of
ratification
12 May,
1969
(accession)
11 July,
2003
17
December,
2003
(signature)
5 October,
1990
21
December,
1975
17
December,
1975
1 July, 1983
1 July,
1975
13 March,
1979
1
November,
1983
5 May ,
1992
2000
(accession)
5 May,
1992
9 September,
2009
(acceptance)
21 March,
1994
30 August,
1994
16
February,
2005
2005
(accession)
29
December,
1993
27 June,
1994
17 May,
2001
24
September,
2004
22 April,
1998
17
December,
2003
(signature)
62
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
63
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
64
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
CHAPTER 5:
BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL PARAMETERS
5.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter provides a description of the current environmental and socio-economic
situation in the project area (Figure 5.1) against which the potential impacts of the proposed
exploratory wells drilling programme in the project area can be assessed, and any future
changes monitored and rectified if necessary. It provides details of the desktop studies, field
survey, and results from laboratory analyses of samples collected in the field which are
based on the methods applied as outlined in Chapter 3, in relation to the possible
exploratory well sites and the surrounding areas which may be directly or indirectly impacted
upon by the proposed project and the associated activities.
65
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
The baseline draws from both primary and secondary data sources. Primary data sources
involved the visit to the project area and undertaking a baseline survey (Table 5.1), while
secondary sources of data include various research papers and published literature
including social and economic data from Government reports. It should be noted that some
of the information in this chapter might be limited due to lack of previous published research
on the biophysical and socio-economic aspects of the project area.
Table 5.1: Chapter layout
Major Sections in this Chapter
Introduction
Issues Addressed
Administrative Set-up
Government,
Non-Governmental
and
Organisations
Demography
Education
Housing
Energy Sources
Land Tenure Systems
Labour Force
Livestock and Crop Production
Trade, Commerce and Industry
Health Settings
Security and Public Safety
Community Views and Concerns
Corporate Social Responsibility
Community-Based
66
proposed project sites are within Turkana South Constituency and falls in the local
government authority of Turkana County Council.
67
internal roads may be rendered impassable. The project area has several airstrips and the
nearest to the project area is the Lokichar Airstrip. Postal and telecommunication services
through mobile telephony and Internet cover the area.
A
Plate 5.1(a & b): (a) Flash floods in the area can render roads impassable, and (b) Lokichar air
strip
68
From 2 to 3N the watershed of the Turkwel River basin is bounded by the Nariwomoru,
Kasuroi, Kamatak and Kimaguru hills to the east (these hills are fully within the project area),
and the Karapokot, Loropokot, Kobaroch and Moruangiliok hills to the west (with their peaks
just outside the western border of the project area) (Figure 5.3). Numerous small and
69
ephemeral streams arise from the hills and are oriented east-west, flowing into the Turkwel
River (Figure 5.3). Those arising from the Nariwomoru, Kasuroi, Kamatak and Kimaguru hills
also flow eastwards from the east-facing slopes into the Kerio River (which lies outside the
project area to the east) and eventually to Lake Turkana.
The Turkwel River is as much as a kilometre wide in places and is bordered along most of its
length by a belt of alluvium which in some places is over 2 kilometres wide (Plate 5.2). The
Turkana Plain, which covers an expansive part of the northern section of the project area, is
well-smoothed, dipping gently at about 3 metres per kilometre from the foot of the
escarpment on the western part of the region (Uganda escarpment) at about 900 metres
above sea level, to Lake Turkana which lies at about 375m above sea level (Figure 5.3)
(Fairburn and Matheson, 1970).
Plate 5.2: showing Turkwel River floodplain at Katilu Irrigation Scheme in Katilu (southern part
of the block).
A
Plate 5.3: Physiography of the project area: a) Floodplain of the Turkwel River, photo taken
from Sigir Hills; and b) Turkana Plain in the northern part of the block, photo taken from
Kunyupat Hill, Lorugumu area.
The Sigir Hills and Kunyupat Hills comprise mainly of Basement System rocks, becoming
smaller in stature and extent northwards, eventually forming only horsts. The Basement
System hills in the western part of the area form steep fault and erosional scarps with deep
gullies (Plate 5.4).
70
Plate 5.4: a) Kasuroi Hill(red arrow), Kasuroi area; b) Lokosimekori Hill, photo taken south of
Ngamia camp; c) Kohu Hills in the background - note the gully erosion in the foreground and
plain in the middle ground; and d) Kobroich inselberg hill, Logogo area.
A distinctive feature in the project area is the large number of dry lugga channels that flow
for only a few hours or days following heavy rains. Often, gullies with high banks occur in
grounds that are slightly more elevated than their immediate surroundings (Plates 5.4 and
5.5).
71
5.2.1.2 Geology
5.2.1.2.1 Geological Setting
Geologically, the project area can be divided into three parts (southern, central and
northern), moving latitudinally from south to north. The thin southern strip (1.3 to 2N) is
dominated by: metamorphosed sediments of the Basement System; Tertiary rocks
represented by plugs and dykes of nephelinites or alkali basalt; and Quaternary rocks that
consist of soils, alluvium, scree and ironstone cappings (Figure 5.4) (McCall, 1964). In the
central section (2 to 230N), there are mainly superficial deposits of Pleistocene to Recent
age that occupy the Turkwel plain, while to the west occur a metamorphic and igneous
complex of Pre-Cambrian rocks containing recrystallised sediments and volcanics (Walsh,
1966). The rocks in the northern part (230 to 3N) are folded gneisses, schists, granulites
and limestones of the basement system that are cut by acid pegmatites and basic intrusions
(Figure 5.4) (Fairburn and Matheson, 1970). In the northwest, the basement system rocks
are covered by a thick series of basalt, andesites and rhyolitic ignimbrites (Figure 5.4).
72
Plate 5.6: Rugged terrain near Lochwaa where cutline 44 has been excavated
Table 5.2: Rock types observed during the field surveys that are significant for project
logistics and EMP.
Basaltic plugs
Quartzofeldspathic
gneiss
Type of
Rock
Locality
Brief Description
Covers areas
such as Lokichar,
Lochwaa and
Kaaroge.
Covers areas
such Lokichar ,
Lokapel and
Lochwa
Natural
Hazards
Potential
rock falls or
topples
Potential
rock falls or
topples
73
Plate 5.7(a & b): (a) Quartzo-feldspathic gneiss in Lochwaa area and (b) Biotite schist in the
Kasuroi area
A
Plate 5.8(a & b): (a) Feldspar-pegmatite vein in Kasuroi area and (b) Basaltic plug on the
southeast of Lochwaa
5.2.2 Soils
5.2.2.1 Soil Mapping Units
The test well drilling sites are found in piedmont plains (Mapping unit Y10), Uplands (Ux10)
and sedimentary plains (Ps28). The sites are yet to be named though one soil mapping unit
(Y10) hosts the Ngamia-1 test well drilling site where drilling has been completed and the
new Twiga-1 test well drilling site (Figure 5.5). The mapping units within the test drilling sites
project area are summarised below. The soil classification process follows the FAOUNESCO legend that accommodates the worlds soils in order to overcome gaps in national
classification systems and to provide a common basis for soil correlation. The identification
of soils is based on the presence of diagnostic horizons and diagnostic properties which are
defined by measurable morphological, physical and chemical criteria related to soil
characteristics that are the result of soil formation. There are 26 soil units recognized by the
FAO- UNESCO legend of which Kenya has 23. The soil mapping unit description refers
mainly to the characteristics of the subsoil usually B horizon, to a depth of 100cm (less if
impenetrable material such as bedrock occurs at a shallower depth). Among the parameters
described is: drainage condition, effective soil depth, colour (moist condition), mottling (if
present), consistence (moist condition), calcareousness (if present), salinity, sodicity (if
present), rockiness (if present), stoniness (if present), cracking (if present), texture,
additional information on special topsoil or subsoil features, landform, geology, inclusions of
other soils, etc (Sombroek et al., 1982). For mapping units the first letter represents the
landform while the second letter represents the geology of the unit. Details on the physicochemical parameters and infiltration tests on the soils are outlined in Appendix 3.
74
Figure 5.5: Soil map of the project area showing the exploratory drilling sites.
75
loam to gravely clay, moderately saline and strongly sodic. The surface consists of sealed
and crusted sandy clay loam to sandy clay textured soils with low soil organic matter
content, overlain by quartzite surface pebbles. The soils classify as mollic Solonetz. The
vegetation of the area is a moderately dense Acacia shrubland dominated by Acacia tortilis.
There are also shrubs of Luqata sigmama and Indigofera spinosa dwarf shrubs. The noxious
invader shrub Juliflora procera is also present. The area serves as grazing grounds with
goats being predominant. Trampling by grazing animals abets the degraded soils condition
making the soil-mapping unit where the exploratory well is sited, fragile.
5
4
A
Soil structure
of A, AB,
Bw1, Bw2 &
C Horizons
AB
Bw1
Bw2
Sandy Clay
Loam
Sandy
loam
Clay
Gravely Sandy
Clay Loam
Gravely Sandy
Clay
Sandy
Clay
Loam/Sandy
Loam
Plate 5.9 (1-5): (1) Piedmont plain showing dunes, meso-relief stabilized by dwarf shrubs (2)
Same unit that is gently undulating and bisected by common narrow rills that support
vegetation and with sandy sealing soils (3) Y10 unit supports livestock grazing (4) profile pit in
th
the unit showing soil horizons and (5) soil structure of the profile, the 5 horizon (Bw2)
showing prismatic structure connotative of Natric B (diagnostic horizon) and soil texture
matrix for the profile pit.
76
is sedimentary plain that is nearly level to gently undulating slopes (0-4%). The plain is
dissected by narrow (<2m wide) and shallow luggas tending northeast to southwest
direction. There are rills and potential gullies forming in the unit where the luggas cross the
land sloping perpendicularly to the drainage pattern. The meso relief consists of elevated
surface (<1m) that is gently undulating due to erosion processes. The soils are well-drained,
very deep, strong brown, friable, moderately calcareous, moderately sodic sandy loam to
sandy clay loam. The surface exhibits sheet wash and rill erosion that has resulted in a
rugged surface with undulations and depressions. The subsoils are compact and though the
surface soils are porous, they exhibit some sealing in places and thin crusts with sandy loam
to sandy clay loam texture. The topsoils are also low in soil organic matter and due to the
sealing; there is increased soil erosion as runoff is abetted with flow movement from upper to
low-lying land. The soils classify as ferralic Cambisols. The vegetation of the area is an open
grassed shrubland dominated by Acacia tortilis, A. reficiens and Indigofera spinosa dwarf
shrubs and grass spp forming the undergrowth. The area serves also as grazing grounds
with goats and camels being predominant. Trampling by grazing animals abets the
degrading soils condition making the soil-mapping unit tending to be fragile.
Horizon structure
4
A
Texture
gr & sb
Bw1
ab & pr
Bw2
gr & ab
C1
pr
C2
ab
SL/SCL
Bw1
SL/SCL
Bw
SL/S
C1
C2
SL/S
SL/S
Plate 5.10: (1) Ps28 unit showing typical lugga flowing NE/SW direction in the unit--that
support vegetation (yellow arrow) and gulley forming (red arrow) and (2) The unit showing
undulating meso-relief stabilized by Indigofera spinosa, (3) Surface Ponding in Ps28 line 37
&40 junction, that occurred after some flash floods earlier and (4) profile pit showing soil
horizons and (5) profile pit soil texture and soil structure representing all the horizons
sampled. The texture in each horizon respectively is as follows: A-Sandy Loam to Sandy Clay
Loam, Bw1- Sandy Loam to Sandy Clay Loam, Bw2- Sandy Loam to Sand, C1-Sandy Loam to
Sand and C2-Sandy Loam to Sand. The structure in each horizon respectively is as follows: Agranular and sub-angular blocky, Bw1-angular blocky and prismatic, Bw2-granular and
angular blocky, C1-prismatic and C2- angular blocky.
77
1
Structure
Texture
3
4
A
A
C1
C1
C2
C2
Plate 5.11(1-4): (1) Ux10 unit showing lugga-cut profile horizons, the background being quartzfeldspar gneiss vein, (2) The shallow (in places moderately deep) soils support poorly
anchored Acacia Senegal vegetation (3) Soil structure showing A-horizon: prismatic and platy
structure, C1-horizon: fine granular and sub-angular blocky structure, in C2- horizon: granular
and sub-angular structure and (4) profile soil texture: A-horizon: gravely Sandy Clay Loam to
Sandy Clay, C1-horizon: gravelly Sandy Clay Loam, C2-horizon: gravelly Sandy Clay.
78
Plate 5.12 (a & b): (a) Mapping unit A8 showing River Turkwel floodplain under irrigation at
Katilu and (b) stratified fluvisol topsoil at the riverbank.
Table 5.3: Soil description within specified soil mapping units observed during the field
surveys that are significant for project logistics and EMP.
Piedmont Plain
Y10
Unit
Locality
Brief Description
Found to the
eastern part of
Block 13T from
the northern
border at
Loturerei,
traversing
southwards to
Katamanak Hills
and along the
River Turkwel
floodplain from
Kangalita in the
north traversing
southwards past
Kaputir.
(*)Natural
Hazards
Sealing
and
crusting soils
Wind erosion
common bare
patches/denud
e of vegetation
Surface runoff
and ponding
Compact-B soil
horizon
Sealing and
crusting soils
Sheet wash
and rill erosion
Surface runoff
and ponding on
depressions
and roadways
Compact B-soil
horizon
Implications
for
the
Project and EMP
Mechanical excavation of
soil may expose the soil
and encourage wind
erosion and further
degrade the unit
Ponding potential may
impede certain activities
to be carried out during
the rains
Campsites may be placed
on bare patches without
disrupting vegetation
Compact subsurface
layer may require
hardened
tools/equipment or
blasting with dynamite if
pits are to be excavated
Mechanical excavation of
soil may expose the soil
and encourage gulley
erosion especially where
access
ways
cross
luggas
and
further
degrade the unit.
Runoff and ponding
potential may impede
certain activities to be
carried out during the
rains.
Common elevated ground
may require
levelling/removal if
campsites are to be
established where
applicable.
Compact subsurface
layer may require
hardened
tools/equipment if pits are
to be excavated.
79
Floodplains (Mapping
unit A8)
Found to the
northern border of
Block 13T and to
the west of River
Turkwel floodplain
stretching to
Nasolot in the
southern end of
the block. The
same unit is found
east of River
Turkwel
floodplain, south
of mapping unit
Ps28 and
stretching
southwards to
Nasolot
Calcaric Regosols
(Sombroek et al., 1982).
Potential
landslips/
rock fall due to
topography and
surface
stones/boulders
and
rockoutcrops
Potential
vegetation-fall
due to poor
anchorage of
plants caused
by shallow and
sodic soils
Sparse
vegetation
found
in
interfluves
Movement/vibration of
machinery/equipment
may trigger rock falls
Mechanical excavation of
soil may expose the soil
and encourage
windblown erosion
Movement of machinery
and equipment may be
hindered due to
topography unless
access-ways are opened
up
Shallow soil and
presence of near surface
parent material would
require hardened
tools/equipment or
blasting with dynamite if
pits are to be excavated
Further surface disruption
may denude the existing
scanty and sparse
vegetation
Seasonal
flooding
and
ponding
Windblown dust
5.2.3 Climate
The proposed project area, which is arid to semi-arid, receives an average annual rainfall of
between 200 and 400mm and average temperatures range from 24 to 38C (Republic of
Kenya, 2002). During the dry seasons, which are between August-February, temperatures
vary between 26 and 40C, while in the rainy seasons between March-July, the range is
from 20 to 25C. The lowest temperatures are experienced in the months of November and
December, and the highest in the months of January, March and August, and may exceed
37C especially in the afternoons. The long rains occur between April and August, while the
short rains occur in October and November. The annual rainfall amount is between 200 and
400mm (Nicholson, 1980), and is erratic and unreliable (Republic of Kenya, 2002). Rainfall is
distributed on an east-west gradient with more rainfall in the western parts and other areas
of higher elevation (Republic of Kenya, 2002), and is higher in the southern sector than in
the northern sector of the project area. Rain falls in brief violent storms resulting in flash
floods, particularly in the northern sector. The high temperatures and low rainfall causes high
rates of evapo-transpiration that result in deposition of salt in the soil and capping on the
surface (Republic of Kenya, 2002).
80
Plate 5.13(a & b): (a) Dry climate affects soils moisture holding characteristics and the loose
and often pulverized soil is easily windblown and (b) Flash floods that can occur suddenly
characterize the study area
81
Plate 5.14 (a & b) :( a) Turkwel River in Katilu area, Note the people crossing at a shallow place
(b) Earth dam being excavated south of Ngamia camp.
The Turkwel River has been dammed for hydroelectric power generation at Turkwel Gorge,
and this dam contributes about 40% of the total power consumed in Kenya and is the third
82
largest dam in the country (Plate 5.14). The rivers contribution to the improved agricultural
activities in the area through providing water for irrigation schemes has been the most
paramount and pronounced benefit to the local community. Some of the irrigation schemes
that use water from the Turkwel River are: Kaputiro Irrigation Scheme in Loyapat area
(funded by World Vision); Arumoru Irrigation Scheme in Kanaodon area (supported by the
Turkana Rehabilitation Programme); Turkwel Irrigation Scheme in Turkwel area and Katilu
irrigation scheme in Katilu (supported by the Government of Kenya). The waters of this river
are highly turbid and not suitable for domestic and/or industrial uses.
Plate 5.15 (a & b): (a) A hand pump operated shallow water well that is used by the local
communities and their livestock at Kasuroi, (b) Nakukulas borehole donated to the local
community by TKBV used by local communities and their livestock.
A
Plate 5.16(a & b):(a) A hand pump operated at a shallow water well at Katilu Centre adjacent to
the Turkwel River floodplain and (b) a hand pump operated at a shallow water well at
Kanaodon.
Some boreholes have dried up due to lack of recharge (e.g. at Lokichar and Loturerei area).
Efforts by TKBV to drill water boreholes have yielded no water near Twiga. Others have
slightly saline water, particularly those that are located far from the luggas, such as the
borehole in Kalemungorok centre.
83
84
Table 5.4: Water quality in the project area (SW Shallow Well; BH Borehole). WHO limits are for drinking water quality: grey shaded boxes show
the limits are exceeded.
PARAMETERS
Lab Sample Nos.
pH
Turkwel
Lokichar
Katilu
River
SW
SW
8.14
8.26
8.5
8.66
Colour (mgPt/l)
60
Turbidity (NTU)
102
PV (mgO2/l)
7.9
0.79
0.79
Conductivity (25C)
(S/l)
Fe (mg/l)
208
634
0.91
Mn (mg/l)
< 0.01
Ca (mg/l)
Mg (mg/l)
Water samples collected during the EIA for test well drilling
0066
0064
0065
Lokichar Nakukulas
Kasuroi
Katilu
Kanaodon
8.17
8.37
8.24
8.03
8.11
6.5-8.5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
15
Nil
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.2
< 0.4
<100
11801
1303
632
1159
1240
2600
887
0.01
0.91
< 0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.3
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.1
22.4
31.2
23.2
6.4
37.6
20.8
76
45.6
<100
6.82
18.97
25.3
28
37.45
8.37
38.4
80.22
35.5
Na (mg/l)
8.8
73.4
195.9
238
28
240
182
356
77.6
200
K (mg/l)
0.4
0.4
0.6
1.2
3.9
1.9
9.6
1.6
10.1
<10
Total Hardness
(mgCaCO3/l)
Total Alkalinity
(mgCaCO3/l)
Cl (mg/l)
84
1.56
162
132
248
56
210
520
260
500
98
288
412
574
270
500
392
760
356
<500
100
25
26
40
325
35
250
F (mg/l)
0.35
2.2
1.0
1.17
1.34
4.17
1.66
0.95
1.5
Nitrate (mg/l)
0.23
0.22
0.45
0.54
0.97
7.14
8.18
12.72
2.72
10
Nitrite (mg/l)
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01
<0.01
0.05
0.06
0.09
<0.01
Sulphate (mg/l)
26.7
14.6
127.1
28.5
28.7
40
Nil
36
76
66
12.9
67
35.71
391.8
718.6
768.8
1612
Kalemungorok
SW
0062
0063
WHO
limits
400
1000
The ground water in the area is suitable for human consumption except for water obtained from Kasuroi borehole due to presence of fluoride in
higher concentration than the recommended level of 1.5mg/l.
85
Dwarf Shrubland
Pockets of this habitat type were encountered along cut line 44. Dwarf shrubland is a habitat
type dominated by woody plants that are not more than 1m in height. Development of this
habitat type is linked to the shallow soil conditions on site. Species encountered included
Acacia reficiens, Indigofera spinosa and Cadaba farinosa. These species are a key source
of browse for goats and sheep.
Riverine Forest
Several hills exist within the study area. The common hills are Lomokamar, Natudao and
Kasoroi. The foot ridges and slopes of these hills are dissected with interfluves of varying
degrees of width and depths. Due to the presence of water and silt, vegetation establishment
and growth is highly pronounced (with trees above 8 meters in height) with Acacia tortilis
dominating the riverine forests. Other species present include Acacia reficiens, Salvadora
persica, Ziziphus mucronata, Delonix elata and Calotropis procera.
87
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Shrubland
This is the most dominant habitat type in the project area. It was encountered along cut lines
10, 36, 37, 39, 40, and 44. Shrublands habitats comprises of woody plants that are less than
8 meters in height and usually with many stems arising at or near the base. This particular
habitat types develops in areas with moderately well developed soils. There are several
variants of this habitat type depending primarily on the amount of crown cover. Dominant
species includes Acacia refciens, Acacia tortilis, Calotropis procera and single stands of
Boscia spp.
Plate 5.19: An Acacia seyal dominated shrubland. Lomokamar Hills are in the background (red
arrows) along the northwestern part of line 39
Plate 5.20: Shrubland dominated by Acacia spp, Indigofera spinosa and Calotropis procera
around the proposed Twiga 1 drilling site
Grassed Shrubland
This habitat type was encountered along cut line 40. Shrub-grassland is an ecotype between
grassland and bush shrub grassland. Grasses are the dominant vegetal cover while
88
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
herbaceous and woody cover is usually around 6 - 20%. Common grass species include
Eragrostis cilianensis, E. racemosa and Chloris virgata. Acacia reficiens, Cadaba farinosa
and Indigofera spinosa dominate woody species. Grassed shrublands are a key source of
forage for goats and sheep.
Near Barren
This habitat type was encountered on the northwestern part of lines 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43
and 44 within the Ux10 mapping unit. A near- barren habitat is described as one where
woody vegetation contributes less than 2% of ground cover (Pratt and Gwynne, 1977). The
89
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
dominant species are Acacia Senegal, Acacia reficiens and Balanites aegyptica. Sites with
interfluves have a high concentration of plant growth due to the presence of water and silt.
Plate 5.23: Near barren habitat along cut line 44. Notice the high concentration of plants along
the interfluves and bare ground in between the interfluves.
Fauna
The study area has a very low mammal count, with only the presence of the following
species being observed: Ground squirrel, Dwarf mongoose, Black-backed jackal, Cape hare,
and Dik-dik. However, the study area has a very rich avian diversity. Species identified
include: Chestnut bellied sand grouse, Red billed hornbill, White browed sparrow weaver,
Black headed Plover, Black bellied go-away bird, Crested hoopoe, Eastern pale chanting
goshawk, White headed Buffalo weaver, Superb starling, Fork tailed drongo, Brown necked
raven, red and Yellow barbet, Abyssinian roller, White throated bee-eater, among others.
The presence of a varied diversity of insect-eating birds indicates that there is a very high
diversity of ants. Reptiles such as snakes and lizards are also present.
90
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Plate 5.24 (a & b): (a) a white bellied Go-away bird and (b) a Red-billed hornbill along the
Turkwel riverine forest
A
Plate 5.25(a, b & c): an Abyssinia Roller encountered along cut line 44, (b) a boomslang up a
tree along cutline 10 (south-eastern part) and (c) Some of the many termite hills dotting the
study area.
91
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
92
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Districts
Male
1
2
Female
Total
population
254,606
LOIMA
TURKANA
126, 539
128, 067
CENTRAL
3
TURKANA
121,022
105,357
226,379
SOUTH
4
CENTRAL
87,199
88,417
175,616
POKOT
Source: 2009 Kenya population and housing census, KNBS.
Total
household
41, 120
Area in
sq. Km.
14, 590.7
Density
28,437
18,670.8
12
32,548
2,898.7
61
17
94
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Divisions
Male
Female
Total
population
1
LOIMA
21,003
19,901
40,904
2
TURKWEL
39,077
39,951
79,028
3
LORENGIPPI
4,110
3,511
7,621
4
LOKICHAR
35,756
31,986
67,742
5
KATILU
22,365
19,559
41,924
6
KAINUK
14,470
11,777
26,247
7
SIGOR
43,113
42,091
85,204
Source: 2009 Kenya population and housing census, KNBS.
Total
household
5,288
12,151
974
8,175
5,414
3,684
16,091
Area in
sq. Km.
3,429.0
5,485.8
617.7
4,536.6
1,143.1
1,684.1
1,582.8
Density
Total
household
4,437
299
1,602
2,314
2,346
Area in
sq. Km.
1,612.5
209.4
333.3
688.4
1,674.3
Density
3,308
5,414
2,272
1,412
1,722
878.0
1,143.1
682.0
1,002.1
185.6
27
37
22
11
48
Total
household
1,250
914
1,644
1,142
493
1,636
Area in
sq. Km.
450.2
582.6
187.8
225.3
199.2
1,071.6
Density
875
964
1,241
234
900
93.4
229.6
453.7
366.4
186.5
88
33
19
48
38
12
14
12
15
37
16
54
Locations
Male
Female
1
2
3
4
5
Total
population
26,671
2,459
8,139
17,834
20,781
LORUGUMU
13,152
13,519
LORENGIPPI
1,393
1,066
TURKWEL
3,871
4,268
KOTARUK
9,246
8,588
LOCHWAANGIK 11,137
9,644
AMATAK
6
LOKICHAR
12,240
11,212
23,452
7
KATILU
22,365
19,559
41,924
8
KAPUTIR
8,227
6,892
15,119
9
KAINUK
6,243
4,885
11,128
10
WEI WEI
4,487
4,354
8,841
Source: 2009 Kenya population and housing census, KNBS.
17
12
24
26
12
Sub Locations
Male
Female
1
2
3
4
5
6
Total
population
8,666
4,737
10,820
9,878
3,606
14,561
KALEMUNYANG
4,400
4,266
LORUGUMU
2,172
2,565
LOKICHAR
5,630
5,190
KOTARUK
5,304
4,574
NAIPA
1,860
1,746
LOCHWAANGIKA
7,915
6,646
MATAK
7
KANAODON
4,627
3,605
8,232
8
LOKAPEL
4,163
3,312
7,475
9
KALEMUNGOROK 4,455
4,076
8,531
10
KATILU
9,120
8,566
17,686
11
KAINUK
3,936
3,215
7,151
Source: 2009 Kenya population and housing census, KNBS.
19
8
58
44
18
14
95
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Number of Respondents
10
5
0
AVERAGE NO OF
CHILDREN
17 - 21 22 - 26 27 - 31 32 - 36 37 - 41 OVER
41
Age Bracket
Figure 5.7: Age bracket data showing average household children numbers
Marital Status
SINGLE
MARRIED
SEPARATED
WIDOWED
4% 1%
17%
78%
96
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Figure 5.9: Population distribution trends in the project area (latest population figures (2009
census) are provided in Tables 5.5 to 5.7).
5.3.1.4 Education
The education sector within the area covered by Block 13T, just like any other ASAL region
in Kenya faces numerous challenges. Among the key challenges are: low enrolment levels;
nomadic livestock husbandry; lack of teaching aids and facilities; low transitional rates from
primary to secondary schools and early marriages leading to increased school dropout.
These problems are also experienced in Turkana South District where the current proposed
exploratory oil and gas wells drilling project shall be located. During the study, the EIA team
did a random sampling to establish education levels in the area. As shown in the education
distribution figure below, approximately 24% of the respondents did not go to school and for
those who reached primary level; only 10% proceed to secondary school.
97
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
EDUCATION DISTRIBUTION
DID NOT ATTEND
Number
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
VOCATIONAL
TERTIARY
Level Attained
During the study across the proposed project area, it was noted that there is now more
emphasis on early childhood education. This initiative is spearheaded by the government in
collaboration with NGOs. Provision of lunch for the pupils is used to encourage high
enrolment at the ECD centres and primary schools.
A
Plate 5.27(a & b): (a)Facilities such as desks are a challenge in most schools in the area; and
(b)Locher-emoit Primary School.
5.3.1.5 Housing
Residents living in the project area traditionally lead a nomadic type of life that involves
moving with livestock in search of pastures and erecting temporary shelters commonly
referred to as manyatta. However, with the changing socio-economic situation and dwindling
pasturelands, most residents are opting for sedentary lifestyle. The government in
collaboration with some NGOs in the area are encouraging this new form of life through
provision of social amenities and infrastructure construction. Water points, shopping centres,
schools, religious sanctuaries and dispensaries, among others, have encouraged the
development of permanent to semi-permanent residential structures. In spite of these efforts,
temporary structures and manyattas also dot the project area. This could partly be explained
by the fact the area has few job opportunities and thus local residents have low income.
98
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
NUMBERS,
RETIRED, 1,
1%
NUMBERS,
FARMING, 14,
18%
NUMBERS,
CIVIL SERVANT,
2, 3%
NUMBERS,
TEACHING, 5,
6%
NUMBERS,
CASUAL
WORKER, 12,
15%
LIVELIHOOD DATA
NUMBERS,
BUSINESS, 26,
33%
100
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Agriculture plays an important role in the economic welfare of the area. Agricultural
activities are carried out mainly along the Turkwel River. This includes irrigation and rainfed farming. There are several irrigation schemes in the area run by the National Irrigation
Board, such as in Katilu and Koputiro areas. Rain-fed agriculture is undertaken on a very
small scale, and the rains are often unreliable. Food crops grown along the river include
maize, beans, millet, sorghum, and cassava. Horticultural produce grown across the region
ranges from kales, cabbages, tomatoes to bananas. All these crops grown along the rivers,
which are a source of food for almost the entire Turkana region, are supplemented with
supplies from Kitale area.
101
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Plate 5.32: Subsistence maize farming along River Turkwel in Katilu area
5.3.2.3 Industry
There are no industrial or manufacturing plants in the proposed project area.
102
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
5.3.2.5 Tourism
There are no gazetted conservation areas in the immediate project site neighbourhood.
However, the region, especially the lower part of Block 13T along Turkwel River, is home to
many wild animals. South Turkana and Nasalot National reserves are found within the
block to the south. The local people are hospitable and have a rich cultural background,
unique flora and fauna, and the scenic landscape, which includes sand dunes and
mountain vistas, place the region in a strategic position to benefit from ecotourism as well
as the tourism industry. With the emerging fortunes of Turkana County coupled with
determination by the government to boost the economy of the area through the Lamu
South Sudan Ethiopia Transport (LAPPSET) corridor project, the regions tourism
potential is looking north and more players in the sub-sector should be encouraged to
invest in the area.
According to the clinical officer in charge of the Reformed Church health centre Malaria
leads in the prevalence of common diseases and conditions in the area. Other prevalent
diseases and conditions include diarrhoea, pneumonia, snake bites, typhoid, respiratory tract
infections and fever.
the Officer Commanding Police Division (OCPD). Administration police camps are in the
area and are located at the location levels. The main security-related issues in the area
revolve around cattle rustling, highway banditry and common criminal activities.
104
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Positive impacts
Employment opportunities for both skilled and non-skilled labour from the community
Provision of social amenities through CSR projects such as building classrooms and
sanitary facilities for schools, and drilling of boreholes in the area;
Creation of access roads in the area and thus improvement of the infrastructure in
the area;
Increased business opportunities and market creation for the local goods such as
charcoal for use within the proponents camps;
Technological transfers from the skilled labourers to the unskilled labourers;
Improved livelihoods of the community members who get job opportunities with
Tullow Kenya B.V.;
Improved levels of literacy in the community as a result of the bursaries and
sponsorship programmes offered by the proponent;
Urbanisation as a result of influx of people in the area in search of employment
opportunities.
Negative impacts
Favouritism and nepotism during the recruitment process through the use of CLOs
and local administration to recruit youth.
Increased vehicular traffic in the area would result in disturbance of livestock in their
grazing areas.
Loosening of soil and compaction in some area as a result of movement of heavy
trucks in the project area
Interference with pastures which the community highly value due to their pastoralist
nature.
Felling of trees to pave way for access roads and the proposed test well drilling site
will destroy the already fragile ecosystem.
Transportation and use of heavy machinery to the proposed test well drilling site will
lead to compaction of soil.
Air pollution from exhaust emissions and dust generated by vehicle traffic.
The EIA team mentioned that an Environmental Management Plan, addressing the potential
negative impacts associated with the proposed project, which the proponent would have to
adhere to strictly would be part of the EIA report.
105
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
CHAPTER 6
ANALYSIS OF PROJECT ALTERNATIVES
6.1 INTRODUCTION
A necessary part of the EIA process is the consideration of alternatives to the proposed
activity.
The many complex factors controlling the location of oil wells (e.g. surface and subsurface
geology, topography, communications) usually means that there are only a few viable
alternatives that can be genuinely considered. The final two alternatives may simply be
whether to proceed (drill option) or not proceed (do-nothing option). Processed and
interpreted seismic data are used to indicate possible areas where hydrocarbons could be
trapped in oil or gas-filled geological structures. Without exploratory drilling, however,
seismic data is unable to show whether hydrocarbons are present, what their quantities are,
and whether the hydrocarbons can be commercially extracted. Exploratory drilling is a
necessary step in the development of commercial hydrocarbon production and is a
requirement under the terms of the PSC awarded to TKBV.
The initial Production Sharing Contract (PSC) with the Government of Kenya was
awarded to Africa Oil B.V. with the aim of exploring in detail the assigned project area
of 8429 km2, in accordance with its contractual obligations under the PSC. TKBV has
since become the operator in the project area and is working in collaboration with its
partner, Africa Oil Corporation. Therefore, rejection of the proposed project would be
in breach of the PSC contractual agreement;
The PSC contract between the Government of Kenya and the proponent obliges the
proponent to prospect for petroleum resources in the block.
106
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Similar projects in the country (CNOOC Africa Ltd. in Block 9, Merti, Africa Oil and
TKBV in Block 10BB Turkana South and Turkana Central respectively) have shown
that impacts are localized and can be mitigated;
The proposed project will be vital in opening up the North Eastern Frontier areas of
the country. The potential direct benefits to the region and the country at large are
financial income and local business opportunities. Secondary indirect benefits are a
potentially increased standard of living and better education, social services and
amenities (for example, improved access roads);
Kenya needs investments that can stimulate its economic development in order to
achieve Vision 2030 and also be able to provide adequate, quality and affordable
energy services;
The project could be a source of revenue (adding to the Gross National Product) and
foreign exchange earnings;
The project has the possibility for long-term technology and knowledge transfer,
bringing economic development and improving the quality of life; and
No irreversible negative impacts that would render the project unfeasible have been
found because of the environmental analysis conducted for the proposed drilling
project.
The only positive impact of choosing the No Action alternative is that there will be no short
duration impacts on the environment.
Vertical drilling is undertaken when a wellbore is drilled with minimum deviation directly
towards the reservoir. On penetrating the reservoir, drilling is stopped and the drill string
removed. At this point, a string of steel casing is cemented in to preserve the integrity of the
well. Drilling continues into the reservoir for a distance sufficiently long enough to allow
proper well testing and evaluation to take place. A production pipe that is later perforated is
run in to the bottom to allow the hydrocarbons to flow in once the well has been completed.
Directional (including horizontal) drilling has proven technically and economically feasible in
a broad range of geologic settings, including tight gas, heavy oil, and coal-bed methane.
This drilling method is proven to substantially increase production hydrocarbons by
107
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
connecting vertical fractures. Because the increased productivity more than compensates for
additional costs, directional drilling can be a commercially attractive development alternative.
This approach minimizes the surface area required for drilling, and simplifies the work
involved to move the rig and equipment from well to well. However, directional drilling does
not necessarily reduce the environmental impacts of oil/gas exploration and development
(such as chemical spills and air pollution), and clustering operations can lead to an
intensification of EHS impacts in the drilling area. Directional drilling is much more costly
than vertical drilling, and is generally not used for exploration purposes, where the benefits
are not fully realised. Directional drilling is more suited to development of hydrocarbon
reserves than for exploration well drilling.
The proposed wells will be drilled vertically to a target depth of approximately 2,500 m. For
this project, a standard medium duty land drilling rig which is already within Block 10BB
(Ngamia 1 site) will be used as per rig specifications below.
108
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
109
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
ii.
There are two basic types of drilling fluids: water-based muds (WBMs) and non-aqueous
drilling fluids or Non-aqueous muds (NAFs or NAMs). WBMs have either fresh water or salt
water as the primary fluid phase, while NAMs have either refined oil or synthetic materials as
the primary fluid phase. For many wells, drilling conditions (e.g. deviated or horizontal wells,
active shale) often require the use of NAMs instead of WBMs for efficient, cost-effective
operations.
WBM is the most commonly used medium in drilling operations, one of the reasons being
that drilled cuttings from WBM are much less damaging to the environment when disposed
of compared with oil or synthetic oil-based fluids. However, water-based systems are not
always as effective as oil- or synthetic-based fluids but NAF systems are generally only
commercially attractive in operations with high day-rate costs such as offshore drilling. OBM
shows improvements over standard water mud in the areas of increased drilling rate and bit
life, reduction in drill-hole problems and torque, less sticking of pipe, and less holeenlargement, but can be toxic to plants and animals, so its use is tightly controlled, and it can
also be prohibitively expensive. SBMs are a relatively new class of drilling mud. They were
developed to combine the technical advantages of OBMs with the low persistence and
toxicity of WBMs. Again, these can be prohibitively expensive and are as a result not the
mud-system of choice.
The drilling fluid to be used for this project will be Water Based Muds (WBM) prepared by
mixing mud additives and chemicals on site to the desired concentrations in fresh water (See
section 2.5).
iii.
Campsites will be built and equipped in such a manner that they will comfortably
accommodate up to 150 personnel on site at any one time. They shall be sited (without
compromising oil target) and constructed with advice from professional security personnel
and local community leaders. Campsites shall be located at a reasonable distance away
from any village, and be fenced off with controlled access only.
110
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
CHAPTER 7
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
7.1 INTRODUCTION
The baseline biophysical and social environmental parameters established in Chapter 5 are
critically examined in this section in relation to the potential environmental and socioeconomic impacts of the proposed exploratory oil and gas wells drilling programme. In
addition to adhering to the mitigations below, the proponent needs to comply with the
requisite national legislation and regulations that are outlined in Chapter 4 of this report.
It should be noted that exploratory oil and gas drilling programme activities are of short
duration, typically about 120 days. This is supported by the fact that a suite of exploratory oil
and gas well drilling programmes have already been conducted in the onshore (Merti, Isiolo
and Loperot, Turkana and currently Ngamia, Lokichar) areas of Kenya, and no adverse or
long-lasting impacts have been reported from these activities. All EIA project reports that
have previously been submitted to NEMA on such exploratory oil and gas drilling
programmes have been approved.
This Chapter identifies the potential environmental and social impacts of the proposed
project, based on the components of the proposed survey mentioned in Chapter 2, in the
context of the baseline conditions that have been established in Chapter 5, and with due
regard to applicable legislation described in Chapter 4. The predicted impacts are then
assessed using the methodology outlined in Chapter 3, and appropriate mitigation measures
are determined.
1.
Environmental
or
Social Parameter
Physiography
and
Geology
Impact Source
Predicted Impacts
2.
Soils
111
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
3.
Air Quality
4.
Water Quality
5.
Terrestrial
Environment
(Habitats, Flora, and
Fauna)
6.
7.
Archaeological,
Historical
Cultural Sites
8.
Visual Aesthetics
Campsite design
Access ways
Rig site assembly
9.
Noise
Vibrations
Land Resources
and
and
112
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
10.
Solid and
Wastes
11.
Social
Characteristics
Liquid
Workforce influx.
12.
Economic
Characteristics
Employment opportunities
Tenders and supplies
Training opportunities
13.
Occupational Health
and Safety
14.
Workforce influx
fieldwork
Improved livelihood
Improved short-term business
opportunities for the locals
Opening up of local economy to
more development
Injuries to workers, visitors and
area residents arising from
project operations
Fire hazard
Other health risks such as
respiratory diseases due to dust
Motor accidents
Petty crimes
Improvement in security due to
security enhancement for project
activities
seasons (March to May; October to December) due to flooding and/or ponding. The area is
generally aseismic so earthquake risk is very low.
Mitigation:
Use existing access roads to the proposed drilling sites to the extent possible;
Pre-survey possible access routes, and use the selected route(s) rather than
accessing the work site through free-range driving across the open country;
Movement of the crews and the vehicles should be restricted to existing roads and
within the operation site to avoid creating unnecessary tracks and trampling of
pasture around the drilling site;
Avoid making roads on steep slopes susceptible to rock fall (see Table 5.2); and
Avoid the Turkwel River riparian area by 30m. Circumvent the area to avoid
compaction of soils that are usually used for crop growing and shallow sand aquifers
that are a source of water for the local communities and livestock during the dry
season.
The potential residual impacts would be rock scarring and displaced sediments (sand
dunes), gravel and boulders, related to construction of new access roads to the drilling sites.
There will be no residual impacts at the drilling site except the drilling hole, which will be
plugged and abandoned if dry.
7.3.2 Soils
In the areas where the surface soils have high sand content, especially in the
undifferentiated levels, sedimentary plains (Ps28 unit) west of Lochwaa and upper fringes of
Y10 units bordering the uplands (Ux10 unit) adjacent to Loturerei, Nagetei, Lochwaa and
Kaaroge, and the whole of Ux10 unit (Figure: 5.5) respectively, compaction by vehicles and
machinery will be slight. However, soils of the River Turkwel floodplain [(A8 unit) (Figure:
5.5)] and soils of the piedmont plains (Y10 unit) bordering A8 unit near Kangalita, Kanaodon,
Nakaton, Katilu, and Kalemngorok are more susceptible to compaction and hence
degradation due to their higher clay content and presence of salts. However, if these soils
are adequately dry (soil moisture content below the plastic limit) when activities occur and
vehicles and machinery minimize the number of times they drive across these soils (save for
soils in mapping unit A8), compaction should be moderate and soil productivity, excepting
other growth factors (as measured by a plants ability to grow) should not be noticeably
affected. Further, for activity targeting A8 unit, movement of machinery/vehicles should be
restricted to the adjacent and bordering soil-mapping units where practicable.
The drainage characteristics of soils with a higher sand content in Ps28 and Ux10 units are
well-drained soils and surface discharge of re-circulated/treated and decontaminated
wastewater should not affect the soil drainage characteristics adversely, if done in phases to
allow percolation into the soil. However, the Y10 and A8 soils are moderately to imperfectly
drained and the fact that surface discharge of water may not be appropriate, as ponding for
long periods is normal in such soils. The soils are susceptible to erosion by wind and water.
Evidence of erosion over-wash and ponding (Ps28 unit) and rills (Ux10) has been observed
on access ways and cut lines in the area.
All the soil units save for A8 unit are sodic in nature at various thresholds (see Appendix 3)
and since sodium is a dispersion agent in soil, near surface competence of the soil material
vis vis surface loading, may be breached. This will affect mechanical surface trenching and
pit establishment and contact of surface water with the soils. The results may be near
surface caving in or subsidence of soil material. The exception to this is soil unit Ux10,
114
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
where soils are very shallow (0-25 cm depth), overlying parent material. This unit is very
shallow to moderately deep. Though it has soils that are strongly sodic, where the surface
soil is shallow, the soils can be skimmed off and subsurface development like pits can be
constructed albeit with the necessary precaution of lining the walls. The soils may also be
contaminated by (mostly) accidental spillages of liquid effluents, oils, fuels, and chemicals.
Mitigation:
The potential residual impacts would be contaminated soils and enhanced ponding, gullying
and erosion due to altered runoff and drainage patterns at local scales.
place to another. The winds can raise substantial quantities of dust. The disturbance of finegrained (fine silt to clay sized particles) soils by vehicles traversing the area will lead to small
quantities of transient airborne dust being generated, especially during windy conditions, but
will be far less than the naturally generated particulate air loading in the area.
Project operations will affect air quality on a micro-scale, and in a transient manner, through
exhaust emissions from vehicles and machinery as well as fugitive emissions (such as from
leaking pipes and tubing, valves, connections, pump seals, compressor seals, pressure relief
valves, tanks or open pits / containments, hydrocarbon loading and unloading operations,
and poorly managed waste disposal and sanitary facilities).
Diesel generator sets at the test well drilling sites will be in operation 24 hours a day to
power the drilling rig. Emissions from the generators will consist mainly of CO2 and water,
and contain traces of NO2, SO2 and suspended particles. The concentration of SO2 in the
emitted gas will depend on the fuel source. Emissions are expected during temporary well
flaring in the event that hydrocarbons are discovered. Such emissions will include volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) such as methane and ethane, benzene, ethyl benzene, toluene,
and xylenes (BTEX); glycols, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).
Mitigation:
Mitigation:
Residual impacts on surface and groundwater resources in terms of quantity and availability
are not expected if the mitigations outlined above are effected.
Mitigation:
117
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
An efficient sanitation system should be put in place for camp workers to eliminate or
minimise the levels of potential water pollutants from domestic effluents;
Pits must be lined with an impermeable liner such as HDPE; for containment of drill
cuttings, spent drilling fluids, domestic and sanitary effluents, should be sited by a
competent and licensed contractor and based on consideration of the geological and
soil characteristics of the area to avoid contamination of nearby surface and ground
water systems;
All chemical and fuel storage areas should be bunded, with spill kits readily available
and operatives trained in their use. The bunds must be a minimum of 110% of the
capacity of the largest vessel to be bunded;
The company should use proper engineering techniques during the drilling,
cementing and casing of the exploratory well;
Fuelling will take place in a designated area;
Hazardous and toxic waste material should be managed according to international
protocols and best practices and in compliance with Kenyan legislation, specifically
the Environment Management and Coordination (Waste Management) Regulations;
Ensure that all vehicles and machinery operating in the field and at drilling operation
sites do not have any oil leaks(section 4.3.10);
All refuelling operations to be carefully overseen and managed;
Ensure that all drivers and technicians are familiar with drip-tray and spill-kit use
through toolbox talks.
Residual impacts on water quality are not expected if the mitigations outlined above are
effected.
Mitigation:
Used motor oil and filters from vehicles and generators should be removed from the
area for proper disposal. Used motor oil should not be used from dust suppression
on access roads. Disposal of chemicals and motor oil should be documented,
including quantities involved, and disposal locations;
A plan should be prepared to prevent and contain accidental oil discharges or fuel
spillages. All equipment should be fitted with drip trays and stationary fuel storage
facilities should have secondary containment;
Pre-planning siting of wells and access roads; and
Restoration.
The residual impact will be reduced vegetation cover around the drilling rig site; however,
this will recover in a few years. Given the small scale of vegetal matter removal, this impact
is not considered significant.
Mitigation:
Mitigation:
It is anticipated that there will be minimal impacts on the aesthetics of the pristine
environment. Construction of campsites and drill rigs will have some minor impact on the
outlook of the project area. The proposed drilling project has a limited time frame and is
transient in nature, thus the visual intrusion shall be negligible.
120
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Mitigation:
Drill rig and campsite design should take into consideration the aesthetics of the
selected areas.
Mitigation:
Ensure that equipment such as generators, drilling rig components, and other
machinery have working silencers to muffle noise and effect a noise mitigation policy
for all operations in accordance with the Environmental Management and
Coordination (Noise and Excessive Vibration Pollution) (Control) Regulations;
Provide full personal protective gear to workers as appropriate (e.g. helmets and ear
muffs/plugs) and as specified in the Occupational Safety and Health Act;
Workers should be sensitized on noise-related and other hazards likely to be
encountered in such a work environment, and trained accordingly;
Engage local leaders in sensitising the communities near the drilling area about the
project and its possible noise impacts;
All machineries such as generators and drilling rig components should be fitted with
noise abatement devices like silencers to muffle noise;
Use generators with minimal noise levels (silent pack enclosures) at the residential
campsites and effect a noise mitigation policy for all operations in accordance with
the Environmental Management and Coordination (Noise and Excessive Vibration
Pollution) (Control) Regulations; and
Segregate the drilling area from the residential area and construct a fence and/or
berm; and living quarters nearest to the boundary should be made of containers
which are reasonably sound-proofed.
No residual impacts are expected if the mitigations outlined above are enforced.
Their culture might be compromised due to influx of outsiders into the area in search
of job opportunities;
122
Loss of their grazing lands /pastures during the construction of drilling sites and base
camps;
Displacement of people from their land;
Increased school dropouts as students seek to earn income to support their families;
Moral decay due to the arrival of people of different cultures and values into the area;
Misinformation of community on the nature of the proposed test well drilling project;
and
Reduced security personnel guarding the community due to employment
opportunities at the test well drilling sites.
Mitigation:
Ensure that the project does not offer job opportunities to school going children;
Sensitize workers to respect the community cultural beliefs and values;
Proponent to maintain good relations with community;
Sensitisation of the community on the activities to be carried out in the proposed
project, and the scheduling of such activities and their potential impacts, should be
done periodically and continually. Community Liaison Officers shall be employed by
the proponent to perform such duties;
The proponent should liaise with Administration Police to ensure the area is safe;
Provision to be made to compensate local property and landowners for any loss or
damage caused by the operations culminating the proposed project;
The proponent should ensure that its employees and contractors relate well with the
community. This can be achieved through enlightenment of the workers on the
communitys culture and traditions;
The proponent should liaise with the local police departments to ensure that the
communitys security is ensured at all times. This can be achieved through
employment of security personnel on a rotational basis; and
Grievance process developed to deal with any complaints.
124
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Mitigation:
A portion of skilled and semi-skilled labour should be sourced from the local
community;
Gender and age should be factored in when offering employment opportunities;
Liaise with community leaders during the recruitment process;
Ensure that the recruitment process is representative of all the areas in the Block;
and
Sustained public awareness and sensitization about the proposed project should be
continued throughout the project lifespan.
The residual impacts in this instance would mostly be positive, including short-term
employment opportunities and infrastructure improvements if access roads are designed in
such a manner that they would be useful to the community post-project.
Mitigation:
Conduct a safety assessment to describe potential safety issues (rig sites access,
work practices, hazardous materials, security, entry into confined spaces,
transportation and installation of heavy equipment, traffic management, emergency
response procedures and fire control and management, among others) and
measures to mitigate them;
Develop and continuously review as need may arise and implement a health and
safety program for all workers and visitors to the drilling sites, addressing all of the
safety issues identified in the assessment and all applicable safety standards;
All operations will be conducted in compliance with Tullows EHS and driving policy,
Tullow Safety Rules, international best practices and Kenya Government
requirements (as set out in the Occupational Health and Safety Act and the Public
Health Act, Energy Act, Physical Planning Act and NEMA Regulations); see also
section 4.2.6 of this report);
Appropriate and well-stocked first aid kits and fire fighting equipment should be
available to all crew, and specific crew members should be trained on first aid
administration and handling of fire fighting equipment (section 4.3.7);
At all times, crews should put on job-specific personal protective equipment, regular
drills, training and tool kit talks should be conducted, and their use made mandatory
in designated areas (section 4.3.7);
A Base Camp Clinic is to be provided, manned by suitably qualified field medical
staff, licensed as appropriate to operate in-country, equipped with equipment and
medication as appropriate, including ambulance vehicle(s);
Adequate warning or cautionary signage will be posted as required;
All electrical equipment shall be properly installed, earthed and regularly inspected,
and where practicable, will comply with IEE 17th edition regulations;
Only properly trained and authorised employees shall operate equipment or
machinery; and
125
Mitigation:
Access to the project site must be controlled and all workers/ visitors be identified by
use of tracking cards;
Adequate security measures should be provided, e.g. construction of reinforced
perimeter fencing, construction of earth berms, provision of safe havens and security
manning around the project site on a 24 hour basis;
The company should liaise with the Provincial Administration, the Kenya Police,
Kenya Police Reservists and other agencies to provide adequate security at the
proposed test well drilling sites and while on transit;
Barriers and guards will be installed as necessary to protect employees and visitors
from physical hazards and criminal activity;
Camp population will be restricted and will not be allowed to interact with the local
populace while at the project site;
Camp will be located at a significant distance from any local communities;
Journey management policy and monitoring to be enforced; and
Vehicle speed will not exceed 40 km/h, with all vehicles fitted with vehicle tracking
and monitoring systems.
Engaging KPRs and use of Provincial Administration to coordinate security issues will
enhance the security situation in the project area.
126
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Mitigations in sections 7.3.1 (Physiography and Geology), 7.3.2 (soils), 7.3.4 (Surface and
ground water) and 7.3.6 (Terrestrial Environment), 7.3.10 (Noise and vibrations) 7.3.14
(occupational health and safety) and 7.3.15 (security and public safety) apply;
Excavated soil should be used in landscape design of the campsite rather than stockpiling;
Campsite will be erected by a qualified and licensed civil and building contractor with
workers who are qualified to carry out assigned tasks;
Construction workers shall use appropriate Personal Protective Equipment;
Adequate temporary housing and sanitation facilities shall be provided for the construction
workers;
Construction equipment and vehicles shall be well maintained, checked and promptly
repaired to ensure no spillage of oils and fuels and to minimise gaseous emissions;
Construction of the campsite shall be undertaken during daylight hours only;
The campsite should be set up away from populated areas and location shall be
determined in consultation with the local community leaders;
Company employees shall comply both with the relevant national legislation, and its own
in-house environmental health and safety (EHS) policies
Adequate warning signs and fire extinguisher equipment will be visibly and appropriately
posted;
The wastes will be segregated, and disposed of in the waste disposal facility as provided
for by the relevant Local Authority
Biomedical waste will not be stored above 0C for more than seven days without the
written approval of the relevant lead agency, provided that untreated pathological waste
shall be disposed of within 48 hours.
Any drilling additives to be used (e.g. foam or polymer) must be non-toxic and biodegradable. Bentonic additives should not be acceptable, as they may plug the aquifer
zones and are extremely difficult to remove during development.
129
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
130
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
131
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Table7.2: Summary of impact evaluation and analysis from the proposed exploratory oil and natural gas drilling operations (pre, during and post
project) on environmental and social factors in the project area (see Chapter 3, section 3.5.2 for impact assessment criteria and rating). Note:
Project Operations includes - site preparation, construction, exploratory drilling, decommissioning and rehabilitation.
Parameter
assessed
Pressures/Impacts
Extent
Duration
Probability
Status
Degree of
confidence
Significance
without
mitigation
Significance
with
mitigation
Regional
Permanent
Definite
Neutral
High
Low
Low
Low
Sitespecific
Long-term
Highly
probable
Negative
High
Low
Low
Low
Sitespecific
Short-term
Definite
Negative
High
Low
Low
Medium
Regional
Permanent
Definite
Negative
Medium
Low
Low
Intensity
- Periodic flooding of
the Turkwel
floodplain
- Active sand dune
building and
Baseline
Medium
degradation
(Pre-project)
- Periodic ponding of
the piedmont plain
adjacent the Turkwel
floodplain and in low
lying areas
Physiography
and Geology
Project
Operations
Climate
- Climate change
leading to higher
Baseline
frequency and
(Pre-project)
intensity of droughts
and floods
132
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Parameter
assessed
Pressures/Impacts
Project
Operations
Surface and
Groundwater
Extent
Duration
Probability
Status
Degree of
confidence
Significance
without
mitigation
Significance
with
mitigation
Medium
Local
Short-term
Definite
Negative
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Local
Short-term
Definite
Negative
Medium
Medium
Low
High
Regional
Permanent
Highly
probable
Negative
Medium
Low
Low
- None
- Dust generated by
wind and enhanced
by low vegetation
cover
- Natural wind and
Baseline
water erosion
(Pre-project)
- Offensive odours
from point sources
e.g. pit latrines and
garbage dumps
Air quality
Intensity
133
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Parameter
assessed
Soils
Terrestrial
Environment
Pressures/Impacts
- Compaction of nearsurface aquifers
such as springs,
Project
reducing yield
Operations
- Downward draining
of groundwater
through well drilling
- Contamination of
water supply source
for the camp
- Soil particulates
erosion and
deposition generated
by wind and
enhanced by low
Baseline
vegetation cover
(Pre-project)
- Water ponding and
erosion via runoff
- Soil compaction by
grazing animals and
livestock
- Dust generated by
vehicles/machinery
movement
Project
- Soil compaction by
Operations
vehicles/machinery
- Soil erosion via wind
and water through
runoff
- Land degradation
from overgrazing
Baseline
- Desertification
(Pre-project) - Local extinction
threat of species
Extent
Duration
Probability
Status
Degree of
confidence
Significance
without
mitigation
Significance
with
mitigation
Sitespecific to
local
Short-term
Improbable
Negative
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Regional
Long term
Highly
probable
Negative
High
Medium
Low
Medium
Local
Medium
probable
Negative
High
Medium
Low
Low
Local
Permanent
Probable
Negative
Low
Low
Low
Intensity
Low
134
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Parameter
assessed
Project
Operations
Water Quality
Pressures/Impacts
Intensity
Extent
Duration
Probability
Status
Degree of
confidence
Significance
without
mitigation
Significance
with
mitigation
- Clearing of
vegetation, thereby
modifying habitats
Medium
Local
Long-term
Probable
Negative
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Sitespecific to
local
Permanent
Probable
Negative
Medium
Low
Low
Low
Sitespecific to
local
Short-term
Probable
Negative
Medium
Low
Low
High
Regional/
Local
Long-term
Negative
Medium
High
High
Medium
Local
Short-term
Probable
Negative
High
Medium
Low
Medium
Local
Short-term
Probable
Negative
Low
Medium
Low
- Contamination of
water supply source
for the camps
Baseline
- Overgrazing
(Pre-project)
High
Land Resources
Project
Operations
Archaeological,
Historical and
Cultural Sites
Visual
Aesthetics
- Disturbance of
pasture area
Baseline
- None
(Pre-project)
Project
Operations
- None
Baseline
- Land degradation
(Pre-project) - Loss of vegetation
135
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Parameter
assessed
Project
Operations
Noise and
Vibrations
Intensity
Extent
Duration
Probability
Status
Degree of
confidence
Significance
without
mitigation
Significance
with
mitigation
- Visual intrusion
- Land degradation
Medium
Local
Short-term
Probable
Negative
Low
Low
Low
Medium
Regional/
Local
Permanent
Definite
Negative
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
Local
Short-term
Definite
Negative
Low
High
Low
- Minimal waste
generated and poorly
Low
managed in town
centres like Lokichar
Local
Mediumterm
Probable
Negative
Low
Low
Low
Local
Short-term
Probable
Negative
Low
Medium
Low
Local
Long-term
Definite
Negative
High
Medium
Medium
Baseline
(Pre-project)
Liquid and Solid
Wastes
Project
Operations
Social
Characteristics
Pressures/Impacts
- Noise from
machineries at the
rig site
- Vehicular noise
136
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Parameter
assessed
Economic
Factors
Pressures/Impacts
Extent
Duration
Probability
Status
Degree of
confidence
Significance
without
mitigation
Significance
with
mitigation
Local
Long-term
Definite
Negative
Low
High
High
Local
Mediumterm
Probable
Positive
Low
High
Low
Medium
Local
Short- term
Probable
Negative
Medium
High
Low
High
Regional
Long-term
Definite
Negative
High
High
Medium
Intensity
- Few job
opportunities
- Poor access to
markets
Baseline
- Slow economic
High
(Pre-project)
growth rate
- Emerging
investment
opportunities
- Creation of job
opportunities
Project
- Poor access to
Operations
markets
Medium
- Slow economic
growth rate
- Emerging investment
opportunities
Baseline
- None
(Pre-project)
Occupational
Health and
Safety
Security and
Public Safety
Project
Operations
- Accidents at the
work place
- Health related
incidences
- Frequent cattle
rustling
- Proliferation of small
Baseline
arms
(Pre-project) - Conflict over
pastures and water
resources
137
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Parameter
assessed
Pressures/Impacts
Project
Operations
- Resource conflicts
Intensity
Extent
Duration
Probability
Status
Degree of
confidence
Significance
without
mitigation
Significance
with
mitigation
Medium
Regional/
local
Mediumterm
Low
probability
Negative
Medium
High
Low
138
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
CHAPTER 8:
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
8.1 INTRODUCTION
Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is a management tool used to ensure that undue or
reasonably avoidable adverse impacts of the construction, operation and decommissioning
of a project are prevented, and that the positive benefits of the projects are enhanced.
Environmental Management Plan (EMP) involves the protection, conservation and
sustainable use of the various social and environmental elements or components. The EMP
for the proposed project provides all the details of project activities, potential impacts,
suggested mitigation measures, desired outcomes, objective indicators, responsibilities and
commitments proposed to minimize environmental impacts of activities, including, monitoring
and evaluation during the implementation and decommissioning phases of the project.
The tool for achieving this is the incorporation of an Environmental Management Plan (EMP)
into the EIA to ensure adherence and future compliance with legislation, good environmental
performance, and integration of environmental issues into the project decision. The EMP
provides the means of assessing the accuracy of the predicted project impacts and the
monitoring of the effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures contained in the EIA
study report. The EMP should therefore indicate how the environmental concerns highlighted
in the EIA would be managed. The EMP shall be incorporated in to project operating
procedures to ensure compliance.
The proponent, TKBV, is proposing to undertake drilling of exploratory wells in Block 13T in
Turkana County. The objective of the project is to check for hydrocarbons presence based
on the delineation of potential hydrocarbons traps considered present due to analysis of
recently acquired seismic data. The proposed drilling sites, which will measure 450m x
250m, will incorporate: the drilling rig pad, working area, accommodation facilities, waste
management facilities, water reservoir (120mx130m), kitchen facilities, power generation
facilities, a laydown area for storage of bulk mud and cement, dry process materials, pipe
rack, machinery, and secondary operations such as welding, painting, and machining. The
site will also include medical and emergency response facilities and security personnel
quarters (see Chapter 2).
TKBV will sub-contract certain aspects of the project. In such a case, the contractor will be
responsible for the implementation and monitoring of the EMP in their related work contract
activity (and this condition should be built into the terms of reference for tendered work and
the contract document. The contractor will also be responsible for the occupational health
and safety of the workers and others who may be carrying out both related and un-related
activities within and around the work sites. TKBV will be responsible for oversight
compliance monitoring and periodic environmental inspections of the work and camp sites in
general. The contractors will also be responsible for implementing corrective actions that
may be required by TKBV as a result of these inspections.
TKBV will train its work force in order to equip them to carry out their duties under the scope
of the EMP. Contractors will likewise be required to do the same for their employees and in
relation to the work component that they have been given to carry out (see the EMP). The
workers shall be regularly informed on, and assessed for, their understanding of the various
policies and plans that relate to their work environment. TKBV will constitute a competent
and effective workforce, taking into account the skills required for each work component, and
giving priority to local workers for employment opportunities in the semi-skilled and unskilled
work categories. Suitable training and skill transfer will be provided, where required.
Specific training requirements are mentioned under the relevant sections of the EMP in this
chapter.
8.8 AUDITING
It is a requirement by law that any project activity being undertaken be audited after every
year of operation until closure. The proposed exploratory wells drilling programme will take a
shorter time and will therefore be audited upon completion of the project. The auditing to be
undertaken at the end of the project is to ensure that the project adhered to the EMP as
outlined in this project report and that corrective measures were put in place in cases where
impacts were identified. If the audit findings indicate that there are impacts that were not
corrected, then the proponent will be required by NEMA to undertake such corrective
measures before the Authority signs off the project.
Besides the regulatory framework, TKBV will conduct regular internal audits covering all
aspects of the EMP during the course of the project operations. The audits shall be
performed by qualified staff and communicated to TKBVs relevant departments.
141
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
142
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Mitigation
Desired Outcomes
Objective Indicators
Monitoring
Responsibility
Management
and
Impacts of new
access
roads
minimized to the
extent possible
Landslips,
rock
topples
from
excavated
material do not
occur
in
the
course of
the
drilling operation
100% pre-survey of
existing access roads
on the ground
Actions
taken
to
minimise new access
roads
impacts
are
recorded
No
project-related
landslips,
or
rock
topples recorded
Number of site specific
excavation
pits
for
construction
material
inventoried
and
monitored
Continuous,
daily.
One-time
assessment
and
site
selection
Desired
rehabilitation
plan put in
place
Risk with
mitigation
(High,
Medium,
or Low)
Low
143
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
8.9.2 Soils
The impact sources from the project operations will include drilling rig and associated
equipment, transport vehicles, bulldozer and other civil works equipment. Other sources will
be oil or chemical leaks from vehicles, machinery, storage areas and the garage.
Potential Impacts
Mitigation
Desired Outcomes
Objective
Indicators
Monitoring
Responsibility
and Management
100%
of
existing routes
and
possible
alternatives
pre-surveyed
on the ground
Appropriate
campsites
surveyed and
selected
Continuous, duration of
pre-survey route checking,
adjusting and opening
bypasses
where
appropriate
Pre-survey checking and
actual exploratory wells
site ground truthing
One-time assessment and
site selection of basecamps and pit sites
Risk with
mitigation
(High,
Medium,
or Low)
Low
144
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Continuous
monitoring
and
safeguard
mechanisms established
to check spillage
subsidence
Zero spillage of
chemicals
and
hazardous
material on soils
immediately in
case
of
an
incident
occurring.
Mitigation
Desired
Outcomes
Objective Indicators
Monitoring
Minimal
pollution
from
exhaust
emissions
Minimal
dust
generation
from traffic
No
offensive
odours
No health
risks
Number of equipment
with low emissions
Use of low sulphur
versus other fuels
Adherence
to
equipment
maintenance
schedule
Set speed limits are
not exceeded (record
exceeded incidents)
No offensive odours
recorded
No violation of OHS
requirements for dust
impact
mitigation
(violations recorded).
Malfunctioning
equipment
removed
immediately
from
operations for repair
Compliance with use
of low sulphur fuel
(fuel supply tenders)
Daily inspection of
sanitary facilities and
waste disposal points
Continuous monitoring
of EHS compliance
Responsibility and
Management
Risk with
mitigation
(High,
Medium,
Low)
Low
145
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Mitigation
Desired Outcomes
No conflict over
water use with
neighbouring
communities
No compaction of
near
surface
aquifers
No
unorganized
disposal of drilling
waste
No waste and mud
in a disposal facility
No oil or chemical
leaks from garage
and storage areas,
vehicles
and
machineries.
No
downward
draining
of
groundwater
through drill holes
Objective
Indicators
Monitoring
Continuous,
during
drilling
Compliance with
buffer
zone
requirements
Weekly
monitoring
of
yields
Compliance with
buffer
zone
requirements
Weekly
monitoring
of
yields
for
a
period
of
4
weeks
Responsibility
Management
and
Risk with
mitigation
(High,
Medium, or
Low)
Low
146
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
report on incidents
of concern.
Mitigation
Desired Outcomes
Objective
Indicators
Monitoring
No contamination
of water supply
source for the
camp
No contamination
of
underlying
aquifers in the
project area
Camp
water
supply source is fit
for
human
consumption
Camp
water
supply source is
protected
Zero spillage of
chemicals
and
hazardous
material on soils
that may lead to
surface/groundwat
Physico-chemical
and microbiological
testing, weekly
Casing
and
cementing
of
borehole
and
wellhead area
Protocols for and
conditions of oils
and
chemicals
storage
at
the
camp are adhered
to
Responsibility and
Management
Risk with
mitigation
(High,
Medium,
Low)
Low
147
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
er pollution
Waste pits and
landfills
are
professionally
sited
Buffer zones are
observed
Professionals
recruited for the
work
Compliance
with
buffer
zone
requirements
Cutting of vegetation
during the
construction of
campsites and
drilling assembly.
Disturbance of
wildlife (physical
presence)
Introduced weeds
and pests
Contamination of the
environment (solid
and liquid wastes)
Land take
Erosion
Mitigation
148
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Desired Outcomes
Minimal
cutting of
vegetation
for
construction
purposes
Minimal
disturbance
of wildlife
No weeds
or pests
introduced
into the
area
Minimal
contaminati
on of the
environmen
t
Objective Indicators
Construction of
support camp and
derrick assembly
installation where
minimal or no
vegetation clearance
is required
A material safety
data sheet should be
maintained for all
potentially hazardous
materials, as well as
supporting
documentation for
the transport, use
and disposal of such
materials
Monitoring
Responsibility
and Management
Risk with
mitigation
(High,
Medium,
or Low)
An
ecologist
may
be
designated to
be in charge of
the
management
and monitoring
of the terrestrial
environment,
and would liaise
closely with and
advise the field
operations
supervisor on a
day-to-day
basis.
During premobilisation
site-specific
assessment
MSDS
sheets will
be held by
the drilling
manager
Low
Potential Impacts
Mitigation
149
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Desired
Outcomes
Objective Indicators
Monitoring
No animal encounters
recorded
No
conflict
with
pastoralists
Land and soil not
exposed to erosion
agents
Minimal
disturbance
and damage
to habitats,
biological
diversity and
vegetation
No disruption
to
pastoralists
Monitoring of animal
presence
along
operation areas
Procedures
for
dealing
with
incidences or/ and
accidents
involving
injury to local people
and livestock
Adhere to the use of
existing access roads
and restrict the use of
heavy vehicles to
specific access roads
Enforce policy against
hunting and gathering
through training and
direct
supervision
where applicable
Responsibility
and
Management
The
Field
Operation
Supervisors
and Transport
Managers
Risk with
mitigation
(High,
Medium,
or Low)
Low
Mitigation
150
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Desired Outcomes
Objective
Indicators
Monitoring
Negligible
interference,
if
any,
with
historical
and
cultural sites
No violations of
buffer
zone
restrictions
The sites are
flagged
for
avoidance
of
interference with
buffer zones
Responsibility
and Management
Cultural
and Field operations
historic sites are
supervisor shall
not
interfered
ensure
with
compliance and
Buffer
zones
that cultural sites
are adhered to
are not disturbed,
Flagging
is Site awareness
done
in
creation
to
workers
collaboration
with local elders
and
cleared
once work is
completed
Risk
with
Mitigation
(High, Medium
or Low)
Low
Mitigation
Desired Outcomes
Objective
Indicators
Monitoring
Responsibility
Management
Minimal
vegetation cover
removal
Proper design of
access roads
Drill
rig
and
camp
site
blending with the
prevailing
environment
Camp
site
and drill rig
design
enhance
aesthetic
value of the
area
Clearance for
access road
minimized
No residual
impacts
Adhere to the
approved camp
site design
Physiography,
Geology
and
Soils sections
apply here too
and
Operations
Manager to
ensure
maintenance of
aesthetic value at
the site and
project areas
Design of the
camp site and drill
rig to incorporate
green principle
where applicable
Risk
with
Mitigation
(High,
Medium
or
Low)
Low
151
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Mitigation
Desired Outcomes
Objective Indicators
Monitoring
Responsibility
and
Management
Risk with
Mitigation
(High,
Medium
or Low)
Review of design
parameters,
as
needed
Monitor installed
equipment
Strict
servicing
work
and
schedules
Managers in
Low
To ensure ambient
noise levels of the
project area are
maintained
near
the
baseline
conditions during
the
construction
and
operation
stage
Sound
level
measurement
equipment
installed
to
monitor
noise
levels
Regularly serviced
and
efficient
vehicle engines
Generators
muffled to abate
noise
charge of
drilling and
transport
152
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Mitigation
153
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Desired
Outcomes
Objective Indicators
Monitoring
Responsibility
and
Management
EHS
Manager
No pollution
of soils and
water ways
No offensive
odours
No reported
health risks
No leakages of oils,
chemicals or liquid
effluent reported
No blockages to
sanitary
and
drainage system
Hazardous and nonhazardous
wastes
are
properly
disposed off and
monitored
PPEs appropriately
used
Daily checks on
sanitary
and
drainage system
Storage areas well
secured and only
authorized personnel
allowed
Waste disposal done
by registered waste
handlers
Adherence to HSE
policy and use of
PPEs monitored
Audits
of
waste
management
plan
and waste tracking
process
Risk with
Mitigation
(High,
Medium or
Low
Low
Potential Impacts
Mitigation
Ensure that the project does not offer job opportunities to school
going children;
Sensitize workers to respect the community cultural beliefs and
values;
Proponent to maintain good relations with community;
Sensitisation of the community on the activities to be carried out
in the proposed project, and the scheduling of such activities and
their potential impacts, should be done periodically and
continually. Community Liaison Officers shall be employed by the
proponent to perform such duties;
The proponent should liaise with Administration Police to ensure
the area is safe.
Provision to be made to compensate local property and
landowners for any loss or damage caused by the operations
culminating the proposed project;
The proponent should ensure that its employees and contractors
relate well with the community. This can be achieved through
enlightenment of the workers on the communitys culture and
traditions;
The proponent should liaise with the local police departments to
ensure that the communitys security is ensured at all times. This
can be achieved through employment of security personnel on a
rotational basis
Grievance process developed to deal with any complaints.
154
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Desired Outcomes
Objective
Indicators
Monitoring
Decrease in crime
rates and no school
drop-outs
Preservation
of
cultural and social
values
Protection of grazing
lands and watering
points
Awareness
of
Tullow
CSR
policies
by
workforce
Grievance
mechanism
in
place
and
implemented
Related
monitoring
aspects
are
being
undertaken
No violations of
Tullow
CSR
policy
No complaints
from the locals
on cultural or
social
values,
concerns
relating to the
workers
Relates to Soils
(8.10.2)
and
Surface
and
Groundwater
Resources
(8.10.4) sections
Responsibility
Management
and
The project
management team
should ensure
community
involvement in
establishment of
recruitment and
tender committees
to check on
recruitment
procedures,
gender balance
and potential
conflict areas.
A
community
liaison
officer
(CLO) should be
responsible
for
implementation of
the
grievance
mechanism.
Risk
with
Mitigation
(High,
Medium or
Low)
Low
Mitigation
Improved livelihood
Employment opportunities
Improved short-term business
opportunities for the locals
Boost economy
Technological installation and
advancement
Transfer of skills to locals
Unequal
opportunities
of
employment
Age limits in employment
155
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Desired Outcomes
Objective
Indicators
Monitoring
Improved
economy
and
living standards
Number of locals
recruited
Number
and
type of CSR
projects
that
TKBV commits
to
Establishment of
recruitment and
tender
committees
As needed
Responsibility and
Management
The
project
management should
ensure
community
involvement in the
establishment
of
recruitment
committees to check
on work influx, gender
balance and potential
conflict areas.
Risk
with
Mitigation
(High, Medium
or Low)
Low
Mitigation
Injuries
to
workers, visitors
and
area
residents arising
from
project
operations
Fire hazard
Other health risks
and diseases
Motor
vehicle
accidents
Conduct a safety assessment to describe potential safety issues (rig site access,
work practices, hazardous materials, security, confined spaces entry,
transportation and installation of heavy equipment, traffic management,
emergency response procedures and fire control and management among others)
and measures to mitigate them;
Develop, continuously review as need may arise and implement a health and
safety program for all workers and visitors to the site, addressing all of the safety
issues identified in the assessment and all applicable safety standards;
All operations will be conducted in compliance with Tullows EHS and driving
policy, Tullow Safety Rules, international best practices and Kenya Government
requirements (as set out in the Occupational Health and Safety Act and the Public
Health Act, Energy Act, Physical Planning Act and NEMA Regulations); see also
section 4.2.6 of this report);
Appropriate and well-stocked first aid kits and fire fighting equipment should be
available to all crew, and specific crew members should be trained on first aid
administration and handling of fire fighting equipment (section 4.3.7);
At all times crews should put on job-specific personal protective equipment;
regular drills, training and tool kit talks should be conducted, and their use made
mandatory in designated areas (section 4.3.7);
A Base Camp Clinic is to be provided, manned by suitably qualified field medical
staff, licensed as appropriate to operate in-country, equipped with equipment and
medication as appropriate, including ambulance vehicle(s);
Adequate warning or cautionary signage will be posted as required;
All electrical equipment shall be properly installed, earthed and regularly
th
inspected, and where practicable will comply with IEE 17 edition regulations;
Only properly trained and authorised employees shall operate equipment or
machinery;
Provision of an Emergency Response Plan, Evacuation Plan, Medivac Plan,
Malaria Management Plan and a communicable diseases education programme.
156
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Desired Outcomes
Objective
Indicators
Monitoring
Responsibility
Management
Continuous
monitoring
and
recording
of
incidences
in
all
sections at
the project
site
Workers and / or
visitors
secure
from
possible
injuries and harm
from
work
or
health
related
hazards
PPEs
appropriately
used
Visible caution
and
warning
signs placed in
strategic areas
Trainings and
drills on HSE
issues
undertaken
and
Managers in charge of
EHS to ensure that
policy on EHS is strictly
adhered to
Schedule
drills
and
trainings and monitor
efficacy regularly
Risk with
Mitigation
(High,
Medium
or Low)
Low
Mitigation
Petty crimes
Improvement in security due to
security enhancement for project
activities
157
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Desired
Outcomes
Objective
Indicators
Monitoring
Responsibility
Management
No
securityrelated
incidents
Adequate
security for the
workforce
at
the
campsite
and on transit
Number
of
security-related
incidents
recorded
Continuous
monitoring
and
recording
of
security incidences
during project life
and
Project manager
to coordinate all
security matters
through security
section
Liaison with
provincial
administration and
Kenya Police will
greatly enhance
security at
workplace and
when on transit
Risk
with
Mitigation
(High,
Medium
or
Low)
Low
Potential Impacts
Mitigation
158
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Desired Outcomes
Objective Indicators
Monitoring
Responsibility
and Management
Minimal disturbance
to
environment
during construction
Reduced potential
for environmental
pollution due to oil
and fuel leaks and
noise and gaseous
emissions
Communities
are
not disturbed
No security-related
incidents
No
safety
and
health-related
incidents
Continuous
monitoring and
recording
of
incidences
The construction
of the campsite
shall
be
supervised
by
the
chosen
contractor
and
overseen
by
TKBV.
Camp
operations shall
be
supervised
and coordinated
by the Camp
Manager.
Risk with
mitigation
(High, Medium
or Low)
Low
Mitigation
Fuelling station will be underlain with a spill-containing liner;
The fuel storage area will be set at one end of the parking bay area,
and will be bunded. The bunds should have the capacity to contain all
the fuel stored inside the fuel bladder in case of leakage;
The fuel storage floor shall be concrete-based, and canvas-lined to
capture minor spillages, with a structure measuring at least 12m x 8m x
0.05m;
The bladder will be charged with fuel ferried by tankers, and will be
conveyed to the pump via an outlet hose;
Clearly marked spill kits will be placed adjacent to the refuelling area,
and all staff involved in vehicle maintenance and refuelling will be
trained in their use;
Clear no smoking signage shall be posted in this area;
Fire-fighting equipment will be placed at strategic places within the
fuelling station and in other areas of the campsite;
All workers will be trained in the use of the installed fire-fighting
equipment;
The fuel storage area will have a tarpaulin covering to protect it from
the weather, and should be well aerated.
159
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Desired Outcomes
Objective
Indicators
No fuel spills
No fires
No fuel
contamination
Monitoring
Number of
incidents
recorded
Continuous
monitoring and
recording of
incidences
Responsibility and
Management
Proper operations in
the fuel filling station
shall be supervised
and coordinated by the
Camp Manager.
Risk with
mitigation
(High, Medium
or Low)
Low
Mitigation
Wastes will be handled as per NEMA Waste Management Regulations
2006;
The wastes will be segregated, and disposed of in the waste disposal
facility as provided for by the relevant Local Authority
Biomedical waste will not be stored above 0C for more than seven
days without the written approval of the relevant lead agency, provided
that untreated pathological waste shall be disposed of within 48 hours.
Desired
Outcomes
No pollution
from medical
and
pharmaceutic
al wastes
Objective
Indicators
Number of
incidents of
improper
disposal
recorded
Monitoring
Continuous monitoring
and recording of
incidences
Responsibility and
Management
Risk with
mitigation
(High,
Medium or
Low)
Low
160
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
Potential Impacts
Mitigation
Disturbance
to
soils
and
vegetation during data acquisition
and borehole drilling
Contamination
during
well
development
Drill cuttings from borehole
Pollution/contamination
of
borehole/aquifer water
Desired Outcomes
Objective
Indicators
Monitoring
Responsibility and
Management
No disturbance to
soil and
vegetation
No contamination
of the aquifer
during well
development and
postdevelopment
Non-target
aquifer strata are
protected
Drilling cuttings
are safely
disposed of
No unnecessary
clearing of
vegetation and
soil disturbance
No contamination
of aquifers
Aquifers, borehole
and well-head are
protected based
on good
construction
practice
Drill cuttings are
safely disposed
Monitoring
during the
drilling and wellhead
construction
phases
Risk with
mitigation
(High,
Medium or
Low)
Low
161
Block 13T Drilling EIA Project Report for TKBV
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
162
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
163
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
various EMP monitoring and evaluation activities. Therefore the EMP will not incur significant
additional costs, over and above those already budgeted for in the project.
164
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
CHAPTER 9
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
9.2 RECOMMENDATIONS
The proposed project will have both positive and negative impacts. The EIA team has
endeavoured to give comprehensive mitigation measures and environmental management
and monitoring mechanisms which if put in place will minimise or completely eradicate the
possible negative impacts. The EMP developed in this report should be strictly adhered to,
to ensure that the project remains environmentally and technically sound throughout its life.
Some of the measures in Chapter 8 that need close implementation and monitoring include
the following:
To avoid destroying vegetation and pastures, and to minimise land degradation in the
proposed project area, pre-survey possible access routes, and use the selected
route(s) rather than accessing the work site through free-range driving across the
open country;
In as much as possible, avoid the Turkwel River riparian area by 30m. Circumvent
the area to avoid compaction of soils that are usually used for crop growing and
shallow sand aquifers that are a source of water for the local communities and
livestock during the dry season;
Vehicles should steer away from natural drains and waterways as is practicable, but
a buffer zone of 20m should be maintained except at crossing points;
165
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
Topsoil that is stripped and removed for construction should be preserved for
rehabilitation of the constructed (campsite/drill rig) area at the end of the project;
Ensure that all vehicles and machinery do not have any oil leaks that could
contaminate the soils;
All fuels and other non-aqueous fluids should be stored in suitable bunded
enclosures;
Limit traffic speed and restrict movement of vehicles as is reasonable to minimize
dust generation;
Only the minimum volume of hydrocarbons required for the flaring test should be
flowed and well test durations should be reduced to the extent practical;
The company should drill its own water supply borehole for use during drilling;
Develop a policy for efficient water usage;
Hazardous and toxic waste material should be managed according to international
protocols and best practices and in compliance with Kenyan legislation, specifically
the Environment Management and Coordination (Waste Management) Regulations;
Refuelling areas must be underlain with spill-proof hard-standing or bund, with spill
kits readily available and operatives trained in their use;
Avoid clearing/altering any land unless necessary; if unavoidable, use best practices
that minimise disturbance of the land resources, flora and fauna;
Hunting, trapping and gathering of food resources by workers, when on and off duty
should be strictly prohibited. This prohibition should extend to the purchase of these
items from the indigenous population by workers;
Before the commencement of the exploration activities, the proponent should liaise
with the community to identify any cultural or revered sites in the area;
All project field workers must be informed, before commencement of operations, that
any disturbance to, defacement of, or removal of archaeological, historical, or sacred
material will not be permitted;
Drill rig and campsite design should take into consideration the aesthetics of the
selected areas;
Ensure that equipment such as generators, drilling rig components, and other
machinery have working silencers to muffle noise and effect a noise mitigation policy
for all operations in accordance with the Environmental Management and
Coordination (Noise and Excessive Vibration Pollution) (Control) Regulations;
Ensure that solid waste is removed from site for recycling/disposal only by an
authorised waste handler, ideally a handler licensed under the Waste Management
Regulations, 2006;
Sensitisation of the community on the activities to be carried out in the proposed
project, the scheduling of such activities and their potential impacts should be done
periodically and continually. Community Liaison Officers can be employed by the
proponent to perform such duties;
As much as possible, a portion of skilled and semi-skilled labour should be sourced
from the local community; and
Develop and continuously review as need may arise and implement a health and
safety program for all workers and visitors to the drilling sites, addressing all of the
safety issues identified in the assessment and all applicable safety standards;
166
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
REFERENCES
Bashat H. Managing Waste in Exploration and Production Activities of the Petroleum
Industry. hc2/101/1191.
Drill Rig, 2009. In Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved May 27, 2009 from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drilling_rig.
Exploration and Production (E&P): Environmental Management in Oil and Gas Exploration
and Production. E&P Forum/ UNEP 1997. Report No. 2, 72/254.
E&P Forum, (1993). Exploration and Production (E7P) Waste Management Guidelines.
Report No. 2.58/196 September 1993.
Fairburn, W.A., and Matheson, F.J., 1970. Geology of the Loiya-Lorugumu Area. Report No.
85, Ministry of Natural Resources Geological Survey of Kenya.
FAO, 1988. FAO Soils bulletin 39: Salt affected soils and their management. FAO Soil
Resources Management and Conservation Service.
FAO-UNESCO, 1997. Soil Map of the World; revised legend with corrections and updates,
ISRIC, Wageningen, 1997.
GVEP Kenya, 2006. Energy Road Map to Achieving MDG Targets Kenya Sectoral Energy
Requirements. Final Report. Consultant: S. Arungu Olende PhD, and Benard Osawa.
Published by GVEP Kenya.
Government of Kenya, 1999. Environmental Management and Coordination Act (No. 8 of
1999). Government printer, Nairobi, Kenya.
Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, 2009. Kenya Population and Housing Census. Volume
1A.
Kenya Soil Survey 1987. Manual for soil survey and land evaluation volume I, miscellaneous
soil paper No. M24, 1987, National Agricultural Research Laboratories.
Landon, J.R (ed). (1984). Booker tropical Soil manual. A handbook for soil survey and
agricultural land evaluation in the tropics and subtropics.
McCall, G. J. H., 1964. Geology of the Sekerr Area. Report No. 65, Ministry of Natural
Resources Geological Survey of Kenya.
Neff, J.M., S. McKelvie, and R.C. Ayers, Jr. 2000. Environmental Impacts of Synthetic Based
Drilling Fluids. OCS Study MMS 2000-64. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Minerals
Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Program, New Orleans, LA. 118 pp.
Neff J. M., 2005. Composition, environmental fates and biological effect of water based
drilling muds and cuttings discharged to the marine environment: a synthesis and
annotated bibliography. Report prepared for the Petroleum Environment Research
Forum (PERF). American Petroleum Institute. Washington, DC, 16pp.
Nicholson, S., 1980. Climatic fluctuations in the arid belt of the old world since the last
glacial maximum; possible causes and future implications. Palaeoecol. Afr., 12: 312.
NOCK, 1987. Aeromagnetic data interpretation of the Winam Gulf and the East African Rift
areas in Kenya. National Oil Corporation of Kenya, Unpubl. Rep. No. 26/2 16 D.
OGP (International Association of Oil & Gas Producers). 2003. Environmental aspects of the
use and disposal of non aqueous drilling fluids associated with offshore oil & gas
operations. Report 342 from OGP, London, England. 103 pp.
Pratt, D.J. and Gwynne, M.D.: Rangeland Management and Ecology in East Africa. Hodder
and Stoughton, London (1977).
167
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
168
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
APPENDICES:
APPENDIX 1: PROPOSED EXPLORATORY TEST WELL DRILLING SITE LAYOUT
APPENDIX 2: PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS MINUTES OF MEETINGS
APPENDIX 3: COPIES OF LABORATORY RESULTS
APPENDIX 5: TKBV PIN NUMBER AND VAT CERTIFICATES
APPENDIX 4: CERTIFICATES OF THE CONSULTANTS
169
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
170
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
They expressed support for the ongoing oil prospecting activity in the area and
welcomed the proposed exploratory oil wells drilling project in Block 13T.
They wanted to find out the kind of agreement that existed between the government
of Kenya and Tullow Kenya B.V.
They wondered whether they would benefit from the job opportunities created as a
result of the drilling of Twiga 1 exploratory test well.
They said that the area had skilled people who Tullow Kenya B.V. should consider
for job opportunities.
They said that Lochwaa Sub-location had not benefited from CSR projects like other
parts of Lokichar Division.
The community expressed fear that the test well drilling process would negatively
affect the soil structure of the area.
They wondered if the vibrations caused by the vibroseis could cause earth tremors in
the area.
They wanted to know if the proposed test wells drilling would result in air pollution as
a result of the release of gases into the atmosphere.
They worried about the possibility of their grazing land being destroyed by the
proposed project.
They said that the seismic cut lines which went hand in hand with the drilling process
were easily used by thieves to raid their livestock.
They wondered if they would be required to move away from their land to give way
for the test wells drilling programme.
They requested Tullow Kenya B.V. to assist their needy children to go to school by
providing bursaries.
171
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
They stated that they were worried about the possibility of attacks from cattle rustlers
and no one to protect them as most of the KPR officers had been taken by BGP.
They requested adequate dissemination of information regarding the test wells
drilling process to eliminate tensions, disputes and misinformation.
They wanted to know the measures that had been put in place by Tullow Oil to curb
accidents as a result of increased vehicle traffic in the area.
The EIA experts responded to the concerns of the community members by informing them
that the area used for any of the test wells drilling would be small just as that previously
demarcated for Ngamia 1 test well drill. The community was therefore urged not to worry
about being displaced or their grazing lands being destroyed by the proposed exploratory
test wells drilling. They were assured that the project activities will not have adverse negative
impacts to the environment and the communitys health, and mitigation measures will be put
in place to reduce or avoid the anticipated impacts
It was further reiterated that the exploratory test wells drilling process would be done while
taking into consideration all relevant laws and policies on the environment such as EMCA,
1999 and the Environmental (Impact Assessment and Audit) Regulations, 2003. The
community was further informed that all their views and comments to Tullow Oil would be
included in the EIA report for their consideration and that copies of the report would be
availed to the various stakeholders in the area such as county council offices, divisional and
district offices as well as Turkana County NEMA office for easy access to all.
The community members were guaranteed their continual involvement in the project through
Community Liaison Officers who would act as a bridge between the community and Tullow
Kenya B.V.
The meeting ended with a prayer at 1.00 p.m.
172
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD AT LOCHER-EMOIT VILLAGE IN LOCHWAA SUBLOCATION, LOCHWAA LOCATION, LOKICHAR DIVISION IN TURKANA SOUTH
DISTRICT ON SUNDAY 24TH JUNE, 2012.
Attendance:
1. Samuel Loperito- Headman Locher-emoit
2. Benjamin Ekaru- Local Teacher
3. Community members
4. EIA Experts
The meeting began with a prayer from Samuel Loperito at 1.00 p.m. The EIA experts
introduced themselves to the community and informed the community about the aim of their
visit. They briefed the community about the proposed exploratory wells drilling programme in
Block 13T, including the proposed Twiga 1 exploratory well drilling that was due to
commence at Kapese.
A brief explanation of the activities involved in a typical exploratory well drilling project was
given to the community to give them an overview of the proposed project.
The communitys views concerning the proposed project included:
173
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
To address some of the communitys concerns, the EIA experts assured them that the
proposed project would not displace the inhabitants of the area. They further explained that
only a small area would be used to set up the test drilling well equipment and camps. The
community was assured that they would still continue to practice livestock keeping as their
grazing land would not be interfered with. On Issues of CSR, the community was assured
that their requests and concerns would be documented in the EIA report and a copy passed
over to the proponent for consideration. The meeting ended with a prayer at 3.00 P.M.
174
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
175
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
They expressed fear that the proposed project could result in wars with neighbouring
countries.
They wondered if the proposed project would displace them from their land.
The community was assured that their views and concerns were appreciated and would be
included in the EIA report for consideration by Tullow Kenya B.V. They were further told that
the proposed exploratory well drilling programme would be done in consideration of Kenyas
legislations on the environment, including EMCA 1999 and the Environmental (Impact
Assessment and Audit) Regulations, 2003. The community was then guaranteed that their
natural resources would be protected throughout the life of the proposed project.
The EIA team thanked the community for attending the meeting and the Assistant Chief
gave a closing prayer at 12.00.
176
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
They wondered why the exploratory wells drilling project was being done on their
grazing land and not in other places.
They had no qualms about the proposed project as they hoped to benefit from CSR
like the communities within Block 10BB.
They wanted to know how the proposed project would benefit their community.
They wondered whether the proposed exploratory wells drilling project would improve
the security situation in the area.
They expressed fear that they might be displaced by the Pokot people who were
claiming that the area within which oil deposits had been detected was theirs. This
claim could not however be substantiated.
They mentioned that their dispensary had no maternity wing and hoped that Tullow
Kenya B.V. would assist them to set up that section within the dispensary as part of
its CSR to the community.
They mentioned classrooms for schools, hospitals, water and employment
opportunities as some of the CSR the proponent should consider. They however
emphasised on lack of sufficient potable water as the main need that they required to
be addressed by the proponent.
They complained they had inadequate security as most of the KPR had been hired
by Tullow Oil B.V.
They requested the proponent to use other channels of communicating with the
community to complement CLOs and to countercheck their performance in acting as
a bridge between the proponent and the community. This followed complaints from
the community members that the CLOs did not present the community interests to
the proponent.
The EIA team assured the community that the proposed project was not drilling for oil but
rather to find out the existence of oil in the area and if it was commercially viable. The
community was also told that the proposed project would only utilise small parcels of land
which would be reinstated to their normal conditions once the proposed hydrocarbons
exploratory programme is decommissioned.
The Assistant Chief thanked the community for attending the meeting and the EIA team for
sharing the important information concerning the proposed exploratory hydrocarbon well
drilling programme in the area. The Assistant Chief implored the EIA team to ensure that all
their views and concerns reach the proponent to which the EIA team responded that the
177
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
issues discussed would be included in the EIA report for Tullow Kenya B.V.s consideration.
The meeting was concluded at 3.30 P.M. with a prayer by a community member.
178
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
179
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
They requested that the proponent considers providing sponsorship to Form Four
leavers to enable them to attend tertiary colleges so as to match the employment
opportunities within the company.
The EIA experts reacted to some of the concerns of the community members by informing
them that their comments would be written in the EIA report for consideration by Tullow
Kenya B.V. The community was also assured that the report would contain an EMP which
Tullow Kenya B.V. would follow to ensure that the environment is protected.
The community was informed that their grazing land would not be destroyed because the
area used for the exploratory well drilling programme would be small and that the probable
negative impacts of the proposed project on the environment and the communitys health
would be mitigated.
The Chief concluded the meeting by thanking the EIA experts for holding the public
consultations. The meeting ended with a prayer at 1.00 p.m.
180
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
They said that they had not yet seen previous EIA reports such as the EIA report for
Block 10BB and that information concerning previous EIA had not yet reached them.
They stated that they wanted access to previous EIA reports on the area.
They wanted Tullow Kenya B.V. to create more awareness to the community on
matters concerning the proposed project.
They inquired if Tullow had in mind any CSR for vulnerable groups in the community.
They said they wanted local contractors to be engaged whenever Tullow Kenya B.V.
wanted to perform CSR that involved construction works.
They requested the proponent to train a local labour force so as to be competent for
the available job opportunities.
They wanted to know the criteria that the proponent was using in sourcing for local
labour.
They requested the proponent to support their pastoralist market by purchasing their
livestock for beef and buying groceries from the community.
The community wanted the test wells drilling site to be named after local names like
Nakukulas and Kapese as opposed to Ngamia 1 and Twiga 1 respectively.
They worried that most of the KPR officers were being taken by Tullow Oil and its
contractors and leaving them unprotected.
They said that the proponent should ensure that they have good relations with
community members and respect every community member.
They wanted the proponent to use the down-top approach in consulting the
community by using village elders as some of the CLOs were not passing over the
right information to and from the company and vice versa in good time.
They alleged that the proponent had put age limits for employment at 45 years
locking out some of the community members from accessing job opportunities.
They worried that the oil exploration process would result in war with neighbouring
countries.
They worried and stated that they had heard rumours that the proposed project
would displace them from their land, a radius of 50km.
They stated that they wanted their resources such as grazing land and trees to
remain intact.
They requested that the proponent sources for their drivers within the community.
They inquired about the benefits that the proposed project would bring to every
member of the community.
They inquired if they would be compensated by Tullow Oil for using their land for oil
exploration.
They wanted an explanation on the possible impacts on their land, especially their
pastures.
181
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
They wanted to know what plans the proponent had in mind in cases where the
community-revered areas such as graves had been interfered with by the proposed
project.
The youth were particularly concerned about recruitment of drivers. They said the
test was unnecessarily skewed to fail them and thus requested the company to
recruit drivers through the local administration.
Responses were given to some of the communitys inquiries. They were assured that the
proposed exploratory test well drillings would utilise only a small portion of land and that
potential environmental impacts would be mitigated using the recommendations of the EIA
report and the Environmental Management Plan.
The EIA team further reassured the community that their views and concerns would be
included in the EIA project report for the proponents consideration. The area Chief gave her
closing remarks and the meeting ended at 1.00 p.m.
182
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
183
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
Mapping Unit A8
This mapping unit bisects Block 13T into two from the north at Turkwel town to the south at
Nasolot (Figure A3.7). The unit was visually observed but not sampled. According to
Sombroek et al, the soils are developed on sediments from various sources (recent
floodplains). They are well drained to imperfectly drained, very deep, dark brown to yellowish
brown, stratified, micaceous, strongly calcareous, predominantly loamy soils. They classify
as Calcaric Fluvisols.
Table A3.1: Soil mapping unit description for Mapping Unit Y10, Kapese
Profile Pit
PP: KTW 001
Twiga A well site, Kapese
Coordinates
WP 722
Parent material
Alluvium from undifferentiated basement system rocks mainly
gneisses
Physiography
Piedmont plain (nearly level to gently undulating)
Drainage
Well drained
Vegetation/Land use
Natural shrub/pastoral shrubland with sparse vegetation of Acacia
tortilis, Luqata sigmama and Indigofera spinosa dwarf shrub
Rock outcrops/surface stones
None
Depth
Deep
Soils general
The unit consists of deep, dark yellowish brown to dark brown,
sandy loam to gravelly sandy clay soils. They have an ABC
sequence of horizons with abrupt and smooth to clear and smooth
boundaries. The soils in the A horizon, are fine granular and subangular blocky structured of strong and moderate grades
respectively. In the B horizon; fine sub-angular blocky, course
angular blocky and course prismatic structured of moderate and
strong grades. The B horizon varies from slightly compact to very
compact while the C horizon is compact.
Color(moist):
A- horizon
B- horizon
Structure
A-horizon
B-horizon
Consistency (dry, moist, wet)
A-horizon
B-horizon
Texture
A-horizon
B-horizon
Sandy Loam
Gravely Sandy Loam to Sandy Clay
Diagnostic Horizon
Soil classification
Natric B
Haplic Solonetz
184
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
Parent material
Physiography
Drainage
Vegetation/Land use
Rock outcrops/surface stones
Depth
Soils general
Cover sands
Sedimentary plain (nearly level to gently undulating)
Open grassed shrub/pastoral shrubland with sparse vegetation of
Acacia tortilis, Acacia reficiens and Indigofera spinosa dwarf shrub
None
Deep to very deep
The unit consists of deep to very deep, brown to strong brown,
loamy sand to sandy loam soils. They have an ABC sequence of
horizons with gradual smooth to clear smooth boundaries. The soils
are fine, granular structured and coarse sub-angular blocky
structured with moderate grades respectively (A horizon) and
medium to coarse angular blocky structured and course columnar
structured both exhibiting strong grades (B horizon). The B horizon
is slightly compact to compact while the C horizons is compact to
very compact
.
Color(moist):
A- horizon
B- horizon
Structure
A-horizon
B-horizon
Consistency (dry, moist, wet)
A-horizon
B-horizon
Texture
A-horizon
B-horizon
Sandy Loam
Loamy sand to Sandy Loam
Diagnostic properties/horizon
Soil classification
185
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
Table A3.3:
Soil mapping unit description for Mapping Unit Ux10, Kobiribiri
Profile Pit
PP: KUx 001
Kobiribiri
Coordinates
E 035.63297 N 02.56037
Parent material
Undifferentiated basement systems rocks predominantly gneisses
Physiography
Upland (irregular, rolling and intensely dissected with narrow
interfluves)
Drainage
Well drained
Vegetation/Land use
Natural shrub/pastoral shrub land with sparse vegetation of Acacia
tortilis, Acacia Senegal, Acacia reficiens, Delonix elata and
Indigofera spinosa dwarf shrub and grass spp
Rock outcrops/surface stones
Depth
Soils general
Color(moist):
A- horizon
Structure
A-horizon
C-horizon
Slightly hard when dry; friable when moist; slightly sticky and nonplastic when wet
Slightly hard when dry, very friable when moist; slightly sticky and
non plastic
Texture
A-horizon
C-horizon
Diagnostic properties
Soil classification
Calcareous
Calcaric Regosol
186
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
A
0-20
14071
8.6
0.2
0.16
80
8
12
SL
11.6
35.3
2.1
0.7
1.0
38.3
100+
1.7
Bw2
77-107
14074
8.7
0.6
0.07
60
4
36
SC
26.4
79.6
2.4
0.4
2.2
83.0
100+
2.3
C
107-150+
14075
9.0
0.6
N/D*
64
6
30
SCL
18.4
83.0
2.0
0.5
2.7
86.1
100+
3.3
A
0-9
14076
7.9
0.15
0.12
80
6
14
SL
13.6
19.9
2.3
1.4
0.2
23.8
100+
1.5
Bw3
103-136
14079
9.0
0.16
0.15
84
2
14
SL
8.0
27.5
2.2
0.4
0.6
30.7
100+
7.5
C
136-150+
14080
8.8
0.14
0.04
86
4
10
LS
7.2
15.3
1.9
0.2
0.2
17.6
100+
2.8
187
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
A
0-10
14081
8.8
0.15
0.73
74
6
20
SCL
15.6
86.7
2.3
0.9
0.2
90.1
100+
1.3
14083
8.7
0.18
0.13
70
12
18
SL
16.0
142.0
2.3
0.3
0.1
144.7
100+
0.6
Key:
SL - Sandy Loam
SC - Sandy Clay
C Clay
Infiltration rates and soil moisture characteristics for Mapping unit Y10
From the measurements, the basic infiltration rate for the piedmont plains soils (Mapping unit
Y10) is 0.22 cm/hr which is categorized as slow (Table A3.9 and Figure A3.8).
A
Plate A3.1 (a &b): Infiltration tests (infiltration equipment and water jerry cans shown by red arrow) at
Twiga-1, exploratory well drill site (Mapping unit Y10) and (b) Same site, removal of surface soil core
ring samples for soil moisture characteristics determination (yellow arrow).
188
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
Cummulative time (Hr)
40.00
50.00
Figure A3.8: Graph showing the saturated basic infiltration rate (cm/hr) of Twiga exploratory
well drill site (Mapping unit Y10). The stable state is realized after 5 Hr 55 min
Table A3.9: Basic infiltration rate measurements for mapping unit Y10
Time
t1(Hr)
0.08
0.12
0.15
0.18
0.22
0.25
0.33
0.42
0.50
0.58
0.67
0.78
0.90
1.03
1.33
1.83
2.00
2.17
2.67
3.67
Cumulative time
t(Hr)
0.08
0.20
0.35
0.53
0.75
1.00
1.33
1.75
2.25
2.83
3.50
4.28
5.18
6.22
7.55
9.38
11.38
13.55
16.22
19.88
Change in height
H1(cm)
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.30
0.30
0.40
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.20
0.40
0.40
0.10
0.10
0.40
0.80
1.70
2.00
Infiltration capacity
(H1/t1)
1.20
0.86
0.67
0.55
0.46
1.20
0.90
0.96
0.40
0.51
0.60
0.26
0.44
0.39
0.08
0.05
0.20
0.37
0.64
0.55
189
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
4.67
5.92
6.67
7.42
24.55
30.47
37.13
44.55
1.20
1.30
1.20
2.80
0.26
0.22
0.18
0.38
The soils of the piedmont plains are deep and though there is moderate surface sealing of
the soil, once they are moist, the soils are very friable and the granular and sub-angular
structure allows for a high initial surface water percolation during the infiltration test. This is
moderated when the subsurface horizons are penetrated. The B-horizon is slightly compact
and compaction increases with depth, therefore the infiltration rate is reduced with depth.
This is corroborated by the change of soil structure from sub-angular blocky to prismatic.
Drainage pores are thus reduced and therefore slowing the infiltration rate significantly
reaching a constant value of 0.22 cm/hr at five hours and fifty five minutes at the Bw1
horizon. Bw2 horizon is more compact than the overlaying horizon (strong grade course
prismatic structure) and the infiltration rate decreases further before increasing in the
underlying C-horizon which is less compact (moderate grade, medium size prismatic and
moderate grade, fine to medium size sub-angular blocky structure) with increased sand
fraction in the sandy clay loam texture matrix (Table A3.3 and Figure A3.8). This unit
experiences moderate seasonal flooding and ponding and also compaction due to animal
grazing, predominantly goats and camels which feed on the Acacia reficiens and Indigofera
dwarf shrubs. The surface compaction caused by trampling accelerates soil structure
degradation. Further, the unit has a compact B-horizon and is moderately saline and strongly
sodic (inferred) affecting negatively soil structure stability.
The unit is therefore unsuitable for surface water discharge/drainage and protection
measures are therefore required to guard against soil and groundwater pollution.
Infiltration rates and soil moisture characteristics for mapping unit Ps28
From the measurements, the basic infiltration rate for the sedimentary plains soils (Mapping
unit Ps28) is 0.55 cm/hr which is categorized as moderately slow (Figure A3.9).
A
Plate A3.2 (a & b): Kasuroi profile pit site; sampling subsurface soil core rings (Ring in situ-yellow
arrow) and (b) Carrying out Infiltration tests [(infiltration equipment-red arrow)--(Mapping unit
Ps28)]
190
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
-10.00
10.00
30.00
50.00
70.00
110.00
90.00
Figure A3.9: Graph showing the saturated basic infiltration rate (cm/hr) of Kasuroi site
(Mapping unit Ps28). The stable state is realized after 6 Hr 17 min
Table A3.10: Basic infiltration rate measurements for mapping unit Ps28
Time
Cumulative time
Change in height
Infiltration capacity
t1(Hr)
(Hr)
(H1)
(H1/t1)
0.02
0.03
0.05
0.07
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.13
0.15
0.17
0.18
0.20
0.22
0.23
0.25
0.28
0.32
0.35
0.38
0.02
0.05
0.10
0.17
0.25
0.35
0.47
0.60
0.75
0.92
1.10
1.30
1.52
1.75
2.00
2.28
2.60
2.95
3.33
0.40
0.10
0.40
0.30
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.40
0.20
0.40
0.30
24.00
3.00
8.00
2.10
1.20
1.00
0.86
0.75
1.33
0.60
0.55
0.50
0.46
0.43
0.80
1.41
0.63
1.14
0.78
191
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
0.42
0.45
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.10
1.17
1.25
1.33
1.42
1.50
1.67
1.83
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.75
3.00
3.08
3.33
3.67
4.00
4.33
4.67
5.08
5.33
5.50
5.87
6.17
6.50
6.85
3.75
4.20
4.70
5.25
5.85
6.50
7.20
7.95
8.75
9.60
10.50
11.45
12.45
13.55
14.72
15.97
17.30
18.72
20.22
21.88
23.72
25.72
27.97
30.47
33.22
36.22
39.30
42.63
46.30
50.30
54.63
59.30
64.38
69.72
75.22
81.08
87.25
93.75
100.60
0.20
0.40
0.50
0.30
0.80
0.40
0.40
0.60
0.40
0.40
0.50
0.20
0.30
1.10
0.40
1.00
0.80
0.70
0.70
1.70
1.60
0.80
2.40
3.50
1.30
2.20
0.80
2.90
3.10
3.50
3.90
4.00
4.80
2.80
1.60
4.50
3.40
3.80
3.80
0.48
0.89
1.00
0.55
1.33
0.62
0.57
0.80
0.50
0.47
0.56
0.21
0.30
1.00
0.34
0.80
0.60
0.49
0.47
1.02
0.87
0.40
1.07
1.40
0.47
0.73
0.26
0.87
0.85
0.88
0.90
0.86
0.94
0.53
0.29
0.77
0.55
0.58
0.55
The soils of the sedimentary plains are very deep and exhibit surface sealing, however once
they are moist, the soils are very friable and the granular and sub-angular blocky structure
allows for initial high infiltration. This is moderated when the subsurface horizons are
penetrated. The B-horizon is compact and varies in degree of compaction (Bw1-compact;
Block 13T: EIA project report for Tullow Kenya B.V
192
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
Bw2 less compact; Bw3 very compact) and the C horizon is also compact. This variation
affects the infiltration rate which slows down in the compact zones and increases slightly in
the less compact horizons. This is corroborated by the change in the soil structure (plate
5.2.2) from angular blocky and columnar to angular blocky structure of different sizes and
strong grades. Thus the drainage pores are reduced and therefore slowing the infiltration
rate reaching a constant value of 0.55 cm/hr at six hours and seventeen minutes at the Bw1
horizon. There is slight variation in the infiltration rate (Table A3.10) in the underlaying
horizon due to similar texture matrix (very slight variation of the sand fraction in the loamy
sand and sandy loam texture matrix (Table A3.7 and Figure A3.9).
Due to the topography of the unit (gently undulating) and drainage characteristics (drainage
is improved by the dominant sand fraction in the soil texture matrix), the infiltration rate could
be higher but it is only impeded by the compact nature of the sub soil. However, the
infiltration rate is classified as moderately slow (Landon 1984) and the unit can support
surface water discharge/drainage so long as the discharge is done commensurate to the
infiltration rate. Where the discharge is more than the infiltration rate however, protection
measures would be required to guard against soil and groundwater pollution.
193
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
0006F
14068
0-20
Class
Strong alkaline
Total Nitrogen %
Org. Carbon %
Phosphorus ppm
Potassium me%
Calcium me%
Magnesium me%
Manganese me%
Copper ppm
Iron ppm
Zinc ppm
Sodium me%
Elect. Cond. mS/cm
Low
Low
Low
Adequate
Adequate
Adequate
low
adequate
adequate
Low
Adequate
adequate
0.04
0.37
3.0
0.41
2.0
2.59
0.14
3.01
32.2
1.91
0.16
0.07
0.05
0.48
2.3
0.59
2.7
2.78
0.04
3.29
34.8
2.36
0.20
0.20
low
low
low
adequate
adequate
adequate
adequate
adequate
adequate
low
Adequate
adequate
Ux10
015F
14070
0-20
value
class
8.45
medium
alkaline
Low
0.05
Low
0.49
Low
5.0
0.79
Adequate
4.5
Adequate
4.19
High
0.15
Adequate
3.26
Adequate
38.6
Adequate
2.38
Low
0.40
Adequate
0.16
Adequate
194
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
195
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
196
EarthviewGeoconsultants Ltd.
197