Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Session 2b - PHILIPPINES, Eddie Dorotan PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 20

Decentralization

in the Philippines
Eddie Dorotan, MD, MPA
Former Mayor, Irosin, Sorsogon
Executive Director, Galing Pook Foundation
Convenor, Global Public Innovations Network

Basic Facts

94M people in 7,100 islands (300,000 sq km)


1.9% pop growth rate
MMR: 99/100,000 live births
IMR: 18/1,000 live births
LE: 72 yrs
Literacy : 92%
7% unemployment rate
GDP growth rate: 6.6%
GDP/Capita: $4,100
26.5% below poverty line
44.8% Gini Index

Government
Republican form
Executive, Legislative (Bicameral), Judiciary
Local Government Units
80 provinces
143 cities
1491 municipalities
42,028 villages/ barangays

Decentralization Push
Post-Marcos Dictatorship/ People Power Revolution
Local Autonomy
self-governing
The granting of more powers, authority, responsibilities
and resources by the national government to local
government units in order to be self-reliant and active
partners
Decentralization
transfer of power and authority from central institution
to lower or local levels of a government system

3 forms of decentralization
Devolution
transfer of power and authority from the national
government to local government units (LGUs); political
and territorial
Deconcentration
transfer of power, authority or responsibility or the
discretion to plan, decide and manage from central to
local levels; administrative and sectoral
Debureaucratization
transfer of some public functions and responsibilities,
which government may perform, to private entities or
NGOs

Aims of the
Local Government Code 1991
Purpose: transform LGUs into self-reliant
communities and active partners in nationbuilding by giving them more powers,
authority, responsibilities and resources
Hopes to achieve economic development at
the regional and local levels by giving LCE
more freedom in carrying out their programs
that are suitable in their areas

Devolved functions to LGUs


1. Agricultural extension
2. Community based forestry
3. Field health and hospital services
4. Public works
5. School building program
6. Social welfare services
7. Tourism
8. Telecommunications
9. Housing
10. Others like investment support

Devolved Regulatory Powers


1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

Reclassification of agricultural lands


Enforcement of environmental laws
Inspection of food products and quarantine
Enforcement of national building code
Operation of tricycles
Processing and approval of subdivision plans
Establishment of cockpits

Share of LGUs in the


Proceeds of National Taxes
Allotment of Internal Revenue: 30-40%
Percentage of internal revenue allocated to
LGUs:
Provinces : 23%
Cities: 23%
Municipalities: 34%
Barangays: 20%

Participatory Governance
Local special bodies
Local development councils
Local health boards
Local school boards
Peace and order councils
Others ( nutrition, agriculture, economic, etc,
bidding committees, etc)
Recall and Referendum and consultations

Corporate Powers of LGUs

Acquire and convey real or personal property


Enter into contracts
Operate and manage of economic enterprises
Generate revenues
Apply for credit and loans, float bonds
Secure grants and donations

2 decades of devolution
Local Government Performance Mx System (107 indicators)
Governance legislation, transparency, citizen participation
Administration devt planning, revenue generation,
resource allocation and utilization, financial accountability,
customer service, human resource mx
Social services health/nutrition, education, housing/basic
utilities, peace/security and disaster preparedness
Economic development agricultural/fisheries devt,
entreprenuership, business and industry promotion
Environmental development natural resource
management, waste management, pollution control
High administrative capacities, variable productivities,
improving MDG attainment

2 decades of devolution
Galing Pook (Excellent Places)
Awarded 270 innovative best practice programs
from 160 LGUs since 1994
Performance/results/impact
Citizen participation
Replicability/Transferability
Sustainability
Innovation

Survey on Local Governance


(2010, Social Weather Station)
+44 Good Net Satisfaction rating
+18 Net local economic optimism score
58% say local govt system
transparent/understandable

Survey on Local Governance


(2010, Social Weather Station)
Very Good ratings (Net Satisfaction score of +50
and above) on 5 issues: Repair and cleanliness of
the public market, Implementing educational
programs, Promoting sports programs,
Maintenance of health centers, and Lighting of
streets.
Good ratings (Net Satisfaction score of +30 to
+49) on 4 issues: Providing information regarding
getting permits, licenses or paying of taxes,
Protecting the environment, Collecting garbage,
and Managing traffic/ flow of vehicles

Survey on Local Governance


Moderate ratings (Net Satisfaction score of +10 to +29)
on 13 issues: Consulting the people, Collecting taxes,
Providing legal services, Setting up of monitoring
systems for development projects and programs with
NGO/PO participation, Implementing development
plans with effective citizen participation, Efforts to
create and collect additional income or funds for the
city/municipal government, Repair of bad roads and
drainage, Fighting crime, Promoting business, Making
information regarding revenues, expenditures and
operations of the city/municipal government easily
available to citizens, Helping the poor, Promoting
tourism, and Providing assistance in farming needs.

Survey on Local Governance


Neutral ratings (Net Satisfaction score of +9 to
-9) on 4 issues: Fighting drug addiction,
Solving the squatter problem, Developing
housing programs, and Developing jobs.
Poor rating (Net Satisfaction score of -10 to 29) on the issue of Eradicating graft and
corruption.

Survey on Local Governance


Trust in local government officials and institutions
enjoy strong public trust: it is a very good Net Trust
rating of +66 for the Mayor and +54 for the Barangay
Council, a good +47 for the City/Municipal Council and
+42 for the Police in the city/municipality, and a
moderate +25 for the non-government organization or
NGOs and +17 for the business associations in the
city/municipality.
The local government employees obtained a very good
Net Satisfaction rating of +50, with higher satisfaction
coming from Mindanao and Balance Luzon.

Challenges
Patronage, money politics, fiefdoms
Inefficient, politically influenced civil service
Dependence of local governments on national
government

Building an Archipelago
of Good Governance
Reform the electoral system
Decentralize more powers, responsibilities and
resources to local governments
Professionalize the civil service
Mobilize the citizenry to demand good
governance

You might also like