Concept of A Characteristic Drying Rate Curve in 1958, Van Meel

Concept of a Characteristic Drying Rate Curve In 1958, van Meel
observed that the drying rate curves, during the falling-rate period, for a
specific material often show the same shape (Figs. 12-18 and 12-19), so that
a single characteristic drying curve can be drawn for the material being dried.
Strictly speaking, the concept should only
apply to materials of the same specific size (surface area to material ratio)
and thickness, but Keey (1992) shows evidence that it applies over a
somewhat wider range with reasonable accuracy. In the absence of
experimental data, a linear falling-rate curve is often a reasonable first guess
for the form of the characteristic function (good approximation for milk
powder, fair for ion-exchange resin, silica gel). At each volume-averaged, free
moisture content, it is assumed that there is a corresponding specific drying
rate relative to the unhindered drying rate in the first drying period that is
independent of the external drying conditions. Volume-averaged means
averaging over the volume (distance cubed for a sphere) rather than just the
distance. The relative drying rate is defined as
where N is the drying rate, Nm is the rate in the constant-rate period, and the
characteristic moisture content becomes
where
is the volume-averaged moisture content, Xcr is the moisture
content at the critical point, and Xe is that at equilibrium. Thus, the drying
curve is normalized to pass through the point (1,1) at the critical point of
transition in drying behavior and the point (0,0) at equilibrium. This
representation leads to a simple lumped parameter expression for the drying
rate in the falling-rate period, namely,
Here k is the external mass-transfer coefficient, m is the humidity- potential

coefficient (corrects for the humidity not being a strictly true representation of
the driving force; close to unity most of the time), YW is the humidity above a
fully wetted surface, and YG is the bulk-gas humidity. Equation (12-52) has
been used extensively as the basis for understanding the behavior of
industrial drying plants owing to its simplicity and the separation of the
parameters that influence the drying process: the material itself f, the design
of the dryer k, and the process conditions m(YW YG)f.
For example, suppose (with nonhygroscopic solids, Xe = 0 kg/kg) that
we have a linear falling-rate curve, with a maximum drying rate Nm of 0.5 kg
moisture/(kg dry solids s) from an initial moisture content of 1 kg
moisture/kg dry solids. If the drying conditions around the sample are
constant, what is the time required to dry the material to a moisture content of
0.2 kg moisture/kg dry solids?
The characteristic drying curve, however, is clearly a gross

approximation. A common drying curve will be found only if the volumeaveraged moisture content reflects the moistness of the surface in some fixed
way.
For example, in the drying of impermeable timbers, for which the surface moisture content reaches equilibrium quickly, there is unlikely to be any
significant connection between the volume-averaged and the surface
moisture contents, so the concept is unlikely to apply. While the concept
might not be expected to apply to the same material with different thickness,
e.g., Pang finds that it applies for different thicknesses in the drying of
softwood timber (Keey, 1992), its applicability appears to be wider than the
theory might suggest. A paper by Kemp and Oakley (2002) explains that
many of the errors in the assumptions in this method often cancel out,
meaning that the concept has wide applicability.
Keey and Suzuki (1974) have explored the conditions for which a
characteristic curve might apply, using a simplified analysis based on an
evaporative front receding through a porous mass. Their analysis shows that
a unique curve pertains only when the material is thinly spread and the
permeability to moisture is large. Internal diffusion often controls drying as the
material becomes very dry, but the result of Keey and Suzuki suggests that
the uniqueness of the curve, in theory, depends on drying not being
significantly controlled by internal diffusion. One might expect, then, to find
characteristic drying curves for small, microporous particles dried individually,
and there is a sufficient body of data to suggest that a characteristic drying
curve may be found to describe the drying of discrete particles below 20 mm
in diameter over a range of conditions that normally exist within a commercial dryer. Nevertheless, Kemp and Oakley (1992) find that many of the
deviations from the assumptions, in practice, cancel out, so that the limitation
suggested by Keey and Suzuki (diffusion not control- ling) is not as severe as
might be expected.
An example of the application of a linear characteristic drying curve is
given in the section on rotary dryers.
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
Lab-, pilot-, and plant-scale experiments all play important roles in drying
research. Lab-scale experiments are often necessary to study product
characteristics and physical properties; pilot-scale experiments are often

used in proof-of-concept process tests and to gener- ate larger quantities of
sample material; and plant-scale experiments are often needed to diagnose
processing problems and to start or change a full-scale process.
Measurement of Drying Curves Measuring and using experimental drying
curves can be difficult. Typically, this is a three-step process. The first step is
to collect samples at different times of drying, the second step is to analyze
each sample for moisture, and the third step is to interpret the data to make
process decisions. Solid sample collection techniques depend on the type of
dryer. Since a drying curve is the moisture content as a function of time, it
must be possible to obtain material before the drying process is complete.
There are several important considerations when sampling material for a
drying curve: 1. The sampling process needs to be fast relative to the drying
process. Drying occurring during or after sampling can produce mis- leading
results. Samples must be sealed prior to analysis. Plastic bags do not provide
a sufficient seal. 2. In heterogeneous samples, the sample must be large
enough to accurately represent the composition of the mixture. Table 12-9
outlines some sampling techniques for various dryer types. Moisture
measurement techniques are critical to the successful collection and
interpretation of drying data. The key message of this section is that the
moisture value almost certainly depends on the measurement technique and
that it is essential to have a consistent
technique when measuring moisture. Table 12-10 compares and contrasts

some different techniques for moisture measurement. The most common
method is gravimetric (loss-on-drying). A sample is weighed in a sample
pan or tray and placed into an oven or heater at some high temperature for a
given length of time. The sample is weighed again after drying. The
difference in weight is then assumed to be due to the complete evaporation of
water from the sample. The sample size, temperature, and drying time are all
important factors. A very large or thick sample may not dry completely in the
given time; a very small sample may not accurately represent the composition
of a heterogeneous sample. A low temperature can fail to completely dry the
sample, and a temperature that is too high can burn the sample, causing an
artificially high loss of mass. Usually, solid samples are collected as
described, but in some experiments, it is more convenient to measure the
change in humidity of the air due to drying. This technique requires a good
mass balance of the system and is more common in lab-scale equipment
than pilot- or plant-scale equipment.
Performing a Mass and Energy Balance on a Large Industrial Dryer
Measuring a mass and energy balance on a large dryer is often necessary to
understand how well the system is operating and how much additional
capacity may be available. This exercise can also be used to detect and
debug gross problems, such as leaks and product buildup. There are several
steps to this process.
1. Draw a sketch of the overall process including all the flows of mass into
and out of the system. Look for places where air can leak into or out of the
system. There is no substitute for physically walking around the equipment to
get this information.
2. Decide on the envelope for the mass and energy balance. Some dryer
systems have hot-air recycle loops and/or combustion or steam heating
systems. It is not always necessary to include these to understand the dryer
operation.
3. Decide on places to measure airflows and temperatures and to take feed
and product samples. Drying systems and other process equipment are
frequently not equipped for such measurements; the system may need minor
modification, such as the installation of ports into pipes for pitot tubes or
humidity probes. These ports must not leak when a probe is in place.
4. Take the appropriate measurements and calculate the mass and energy
balances. The measurements are inlet and outlet temperatures, humidities,
and flow rates of the air inlets and outlets as well as the moisture and temperature of the feed and dry solids. The following are methods for each of the
measurements: Airflow Rate This is often the most difficult to measure. Fan
curves are often available for blowers but are not always reliable. A small pitot
tube can be used (see Sec. 22, Waste Management, in this Handbook) to
measure local velocity. The best location to use a pitot tube is in a straight
section of pipe. Measurements at multiple positions in the cross section of the
pipe or duct are advisable, partic- ularly in laminar flow or near elbows and
other flow disruptions. Air Temperature A simple thermocouple can be used in

most cases, but in some cases special care must be taken to ensure that wet
or sticky material does not build up on the thermocouple. A wet thermocouple will yield a low temperature from evaporative cooling. Air Humidity
Humidity probes need to be calibrated before use, and the absolute humidity
(or both the relative humidity and temperature) needs to be recorded. If the
probe temperature is below the dew point of the air in the process, then
condensation on the probe will occur until the probe heats. Feed and Exit
Solids Rate These are generally known, particu- larly for a unit in production.
Liquids can be measured by using a bucket and stopwatch. Solids can be
measured in a variety of ways. Feed and Exit Solids Moisture Content These
need to be measured using an appropriate technique, as described above.
Use the same method for both the feed and exit solids. Dont rely on formula
sheets for feed moisture information. Figure 12-20 shows some common
tools used in these measurements.

Concept of A Characteristic Drying Rate Curve in 1958, Van Meel

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Concept of A Characteristic Drying Rate Curve in 1958, Van Meel

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Concept of A Characteristic Drying Rate Curve in 1958, Van Meel

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Concept of a Characteristic Drying Rate Curve In 1958, van Meel

is the volume-averaged moisture content, Xcr is the moisture

Here k is the external mass-transfer coefficient, m is the humidity- potential

The characteristic drying curve, however, is clearly a gross

characteristics and physical properties; pilot-scale experi- ments are often

technique when measuring moisture. Table 12-10 compares and contrasts

other flow disruptions. Air Temperature A simple thermocouple can be used in

You might also like