Intermediate Accounting (15th Edition) by Donald E. Kieso & Others - 2
Intermediate Accounting (15th Edition) by Donald E. Kieso & Others - 2
Intermediate Accounting (15th Edition) by Donald E. Kieso & Others - 2
Principles
Briefly explain the different rationales for the different accounting and reporting rules for different types of
investments in the securities of other companies.
IFRS
INSIGHTS
LEARNING OBJECTIVE 13
RELEVANT FACTS
Following are the key similarities and differences between GAAP and IFRS related to
investments.
Similarities
GAAP and IFRS use similar classifications for trading investments.
The accounting for trading investments is the same between GAAP and IFRS. Heldto-maturity (GAAP) and held-for-collection (IFRS) investments are accounted for at
Differences
While GAAP classifies investments as trading, available-for-sale (both debt and
equity investments), and held-to-maturity (only for debt investments), IFRS uses
held-for-collection (debt investments), trading (both debt and equity investments),
and non-trading equity investment classifications.
The basis for consolidation under IFRS is control. Under GAAP, a bipolar approach is
used, which is a risk-and-reward model (often referred to as a variable-entity approach,
discussed in Appendix 17B) and a voting-interest approach. However, under both systems, for consolidation to occur, the investor company must generally own 50 percent
of another company.
While the measurement of impairments is similar under GAAP and IFRS, GAAP does
not permit the reversal of an impairment charge related to available-for-sale debt
and equity investments. IFRS allows reversals of impairments of held-for-collection
investments.
While GAAP and IFRS are similar in the accounting for the fair value option, one difference is that GAAP permits the fair value option for equity method investments;
IFRS does not.
ILLUSTRATION
IFRS17-1
Type of Investment
Summary of Investment
Accounting Approaches
Debt
Equity
Valuation Approach
Amortized cost
Fair value
Fair value
Equity method
Debt Investments
Debt InvestmentsAmortized Cost
Only debt investments can be measured at amortized cost. If a company like Carrefour
makes an investment in the bonds of Nokia, it will receive contractual cash flows of
interest over the life of the bonds and repayment of the principal at maturity. If it is
Carrefours strategy to hold this investment in order to receive these cash flows over the
life of the bond, it has a held-for-collection strategy and it will measure the investment
at amortized cost.44
Example: Debt Investment at Amortized Cost. To illustrate the accounting for a debt
investment at amortized cost, assume that Robinson Company purchased $100,000 of
8 percent bonds of Evermaster Corporation on January 1, 2014, at a discount, paying
$92,278. The bonds mature January 1, 2019, and yield 10 percent; interest is payable each
July 1 and January 1. Robinson records the investment as follows.
January 1, 2014
Debt Investments
Cash
92,278
92,278
Classification as held-for-collection does not mean the security must be held to maturity. For
example, a company may sell an investment before maturity if (1) the security does not meet
the companys investment strategy (e.g., the company has a policy to invest in only AAA-rated
bonds but the bond investment has a decline in its credit rating), (2) a company changes its
strategy to invest only in securities within a certain maturity range, or (3) the company needs
to sell a security to fund certain capital expenditures. However, if a company begins trading
held-for-collection investments on a regular basis, it should assess whether such trading is
consistent with the held-for-collection classification.
Date
Cash
Received
Interest
Revenue
Bond
Discount
Amortization
Carrying
Amount
of Bonds
1/1/14
7/1/14
1/1/15
7/1/15
1/1/16
7/1/16
1/1/17
7/1/17
1/1/18
7/1/18
1/1/19
$ 4,000a
4,000
4,000
4,000
4,000
4,000
4,000
4,000
4,000
4,000
$ 4,614b
4,645
4,677
4,711
4,746
4,783
4,823
4,864
4,907
4,952
$ 614c
645
677
711
746
783
823
864
907
952
$ 92,278
92,892d
93,537
94,214
94,925
95,671
96,454
97,277
98,141
99,048
100,000
$40,000
$47,722
$7,722
Robinson records the receipt of the first semiannual interest payment on July 1, 2014
(using the data in Illustration IFRS17-2), as follows.
July 1, 2014
Cash
Debt Investments
Interest Revenue
4,000
614
4,614
4,000
645
4,645
Again, Illustration IFRS17-2 shows the interest and amortization amounts. Thus, the
accounting for held-for-collection investments in IFRS is the same as held-to-maturity
investments under GAAP.
Debt InvestmentsFair Value
In some cases, companies both manage and evaluate investment performance on a fair
value basis. In these situations, these investments are managed and evaluated based on
a documented risk-management or investment strategy based on fair value information. For example, some companies often hold debt investments with the intention of
selling them in a short period of time. These debt investments are often referred to as
trading investments because companies frequently buy and sell these investments to
generate profits in short-term differences in price.
Companies that account for and report debt investments at fair value follow the
same accounting entries as debt investments held-for-collection during the reporting
period. That is, they are recorded at amortized cost. However, at each reporting date,
companies adjust the amortized cost to fair value, with any unrealized holding gain
or loss reported as part of net income (fair value method). An unrealized holding gain
or loss is the net change in the fair value of a debt investment from one period to another.
Example: Debt Investment at Fair Value. To illustrate the accounting for debt investments using the fair value approach, assume the same information as in our previous
ILLUSTRATION
IFRS17-2
Schedule of Interest
Revenue and Bond
Discount Amortization
Effective-Interest Method
92,278
92,278
July 1, 2014
Cash
Debt Investments
Interest Revenue
4,000
614
4,614
December 31, 2014
Interest Receivable
Debt Investments
Interest Revenue
4,000
645
4,645
Again, Illustration IFRS17-2 shows the interest and amortization amounts. If the
debt investment is held-for-collection, no further entries are necessary. To apply the fair
value approach, Robinson determines that, due to a decrease in interest rates, the fair
value of the debt investment increased to $95,000 at December 31, 2014. Comparing the
fair value with the carrying amount of these bonds at December 31, 2014, Robinson has
an unrealized holding gain of $1,463, as shown in Illustration IFRS17-3.
ILLUSTRATION
IFRS17-3
Computation of
Unrealized Gain on Fair
Value Debt Investment
(2014)
$95,000
93,537
$ 1,463
Robinson therefore makes the following entry to record the adjustment of the debt
investment to fair value at December 31, 2014.
Fair Value Adjustment
Unrealized Holding Gain or LossIncome
1,463
1,463
Companies may incur brokerage and transaction costs in purchasing securities. For investments
accounted for at fair value (both debt and equity), IFRS requires that these costs be recorded in
net income as other income and expense and not as an adjustment to the carrying value of the
investment.
ILLUSTRATION
IFRS17-4
$ 4,000
95,000
Financial Statement
Presentation of Debt
Investments at Fair Value
Income Statement
Other income and expense
Interest revenue ($4,614 1 $4,645)
Unrealized holding gain or (loss)
$ 9,259
1,463
As you can see from this example, the accounting for trading debt investments under
IFRS is the same as GAAP.
Equity Investments
As in GAAP, under IFRS, the degree to which one corporation (investor) acquires
an interest in the shares of another corporation (investee) generally determines the
accounting treatment for the investment subsequent to acquisition. To review, the
classification of such investments depends on the percentage of the investee voting
shares that is held by the investor:
1. Holdings of less than 20 percent (fair value method)investor has passive interest.
2. Holdings between 20 percent and 50 percent (equity method)investor has
significant influence.
3. Holdings of more than 50 percent (consolidated statements)investor has controlling
interest.
The accounting and reporting for equity investments therefore depend on the level
of influence and the type of security involved, as shown in Illustration IFRS17-5.
Category
Valuation
Unrealized Holding
Gains or Losses
Holdings less
than 20%
1. Trading
Fair value
Recognized in net
income
Dividends declared;
gains and losses
from sale.
2. NonTrading
Fair value
Recognized in Other
comprehensive
income (OCI) and as
separate component
of equity
Dividends declared;
gains and losses
from sale.
Holdings between
20% and 50%
Equity
Not recognized
Proportionate share
of investees net
income.
Holdings more
than 50%
Consolidation
Not recognized
Not applicable.
ILLUSTRATION
IFRS17-5
Accounting and
Reporting for Equity
Investments by Category
$259,700
317,500
141,350
$718,550
718,550
718,550
4,200
4,200
All three of the investee companies reported net income for the year, but only Nestl
declared and paid a dividend to Republic. But, recall that when an investor owns less
than 20 percent of the shares of another corporation, it is presumed that the investor
has relatively little influence on the investee. As a result, net income of the investee is
not a proper basis for recognizing income from the investment by the investor.
Why? Because the increased net assets resulting from profitable operations may be
permanently retained for use in the investees business. Therefore, the investor recognizes net income only when the investee declares cash dividends.
At December 31, 2014, Republics equity investment portfolio has the carrying value
and fair value shown in Illustration IFRS17-6.
46
Fair value at initial recognition is the transaction price (exclusive of brokerage and other
transaction costs). Subsequent fair value measurements should be based on market prices, if
available. For non-traded investments, a valuation technique based on discounted expected cash
flows can be used to develop a fair value estimate. While IFRS requires that all equity investments
be measured at fair value, in certain limited cases, cost may be an appropriate estimate of fair
value for an equity investment.
ILLUSTRATION
IFRS17-6
Fair Value
Burberry
Nestl
St. Regis Pulp Co.
$259,700
317,500
141,350
$275,000
304,000
104,000
$ 15,300
(13,500)
(37,350)
Total of portfolio
$718,550
$683,000
(35,550)
Investments
Computation of Fair
Value Adjustment
Equity Investment
Portfolio (2014)
$(35,550)
For Republics equity investment portfolio, the gross unrealized gains are $15,300, and
the gross unrealized losses are $50,850 ($13,500 1 $37,350), resulting in a net unrealized loss
of $35,550. The fair value of the equity investment portfolio is below cost by $35,550.
As with debt investments, Republic records the net unrealized gains and losses
related to changes in the fair value of equity investments in an Unrealized Holding Gain
or LossIncome account. Republic reports this amount as other income and expense. In
this case, Republic prepares an adjusting entry debiting the Unrealized Holding Gain or
LossIncome account and crediting the Fair Value Adjustment account to record the
decrease in fair value and to record the loss as follows.
December 31, 2014
Unrealized Holding Gain or LossIncome
Fair Value Adjustment
35,550
35,550
On January 23, 2015, Republic sold all of its Burberry ordinary shares, receiving
$287,220. Illustration IFRS17-7 shows the computation of the realized gain on the sale.
Net proceeds from sale
Cost of Burberry shares
$287,220
259,700
$ 27,520
ILLUSTRATION
IFRS17-7
Computation of Gain on
Sale of Burberry Shares
287,220
259,700
27,520
As indicated in this example, the fair value method accounting for trading equity
investments under IFRS is the same as GAAP for trading equity investments. As shown
in the next section, the accounting for non-trading equity investments under IFRS is
similar to the accounting for available-for-sale equity investments under GAAP.
Example: Equity Investments (OCI). The accounting entries to record non-trading
equity investments are the same as for trading equity investments, except for recording
the unrealized holding gain or loss. For non-trading equity investments, companies
report the unrealized holding gain or loss as other comprehensive income (OCI).
Thus, the account titled Unrealized Holding Gain or LossEquity is used.
To illustrate, assume that on December 10, 2014, Republic Corporation purchased
$20,750 of 1,000 ordinary shares of Hawthorne Company for $20.75 per share (which
represents less than a 20 percent interest). Hawthorne is a distributor for Republic
products in certain locales, the laws of which require a minimum level of share ownership
of a company in that region. The investment in Hawthorne meets this regulatory
20,750
20,750
On December 27, 2014, Republic receives a cash dividend of $450 on its investment
in the ordinary shares of Hawthorne Company. It records the cash dividend as follows.
December 27, 2014
Cash
Dividend Revenue
450
450
Similar to the accounting for trading investments, when an investor owns less than
20 percent of the ordinary shares of another corporation, it is presumed that the investor
has relatively little influence on the investee. Therefore, the investor earns income
when the investee declares cash dividends.
At December 31, 2014, Republics investment in Hawthorne has the carrying value
and fair value shown in Illustration IFRS17-8.
ILLUSTRATION
IFRS17-8
Computation of Fair
Value Adjustment
Non-Trading Equity
Investment (2014)
Carrying Value
Fair Value
Hawthorne Company
Previous fair value adjustment balance
$20,750
$24,000
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
$3,250
0
$3,250
For Republics non-trading investment, the unrealized gain is $3,250. That is, the fair
value of the Hawthorne investment exceeds cost by $3,250. Because Republic has classified
this investment as non-trading, Republic records the unrealized gains and losses related to
changes in the fair value of this non-trading equity investment in an Unrealized Holding
Gain or LossEquity account. Republic reports this amount as a part of other comprehensive income and as a component of other accumulated comprehensive income (reported
in equity) until realized. In this case, Republic prepares an adjusting entry crediting the
Unrealized Holding Gain or LossEquity account and debiting the Fair Value Adjustment
account to record the decrease in fair value and to record the loss as follows.
December 31, 2014
Fair Value Adjustment
Unrealized Holding Gain or LossEquity
3,250
3,250
Republic reports its equity investments in its December 31, 2014, financial statements as
shown in Illustration IFRS17-9.
ILLUSTRATION
IFRS17-9
Financial Statement
Presentation of Equity
Investments at Fair Value
(2014)
Investments
Equity investments (non-trading)
$24,000
Equity
Accumulated other comprehensive gain
$ 3,250
47
$ 3,250
450
$22,500
20,750
$ 1,750
ILLUSTRATION
IFRS17-10
Computation of Gain on
Sale of Shares
22,500
20,750
1,750
Because Republic no longer holds any equity investments, it makes the following entry
to eliminate the Fair Value Adjustment account.
December 31, 2015
Unrealized Holding Gain or LossEquity
Fair Value Adjustment
3,250
3,250
In summary, the accounting for non-trading equity investments deviates from the
general provisions for equity investments. The IASB noted that while fair value provides the most useful information about investments in equity investments, recording
unrealized gains or losses in other comprehensive income is more representative for
non-trading equity investments.
Impairments
A company should evaluate every held-for-collection investment, at each reporting
date, to determine if it has suffered impairmenta loss in value such that the fair value
of the investment is below its carrying value.48 For example, if an investee experiences a
bankruptcy or a significant liquidity crisis, the investor may suffer a permanent loss. If the
company determines that an investment is impaired, it writes down the amortized
cost basis of the individual security to reflect this loss in value. The company accounts
for the write-down as a realized loss, and it includes the amount in net income.
For debt investments, a company uses the impairment test to determine whether
it is probable that the investor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the
contractual terms. If an investment is impaired, the company should measure the loss
due to the impairment. This impairment loss is calculated as the difference between the
carrying amount plus accrued interest and the expected future cash flows discounted at
the investments historical effective-interest rate.
Example: Impairment Loss
At December 31, 2013, Mayhew Company has a debt investment in Bellovary Inc., purchased at par for $200,000. The investment has a term of four years, with annual interest
payments at 10 percent, paid at the end of each year (the historical effective-interest rate
is 10 percent). This debt investment is classified as held-for-collection. Unfortunately,
Bellovary is experiencing significant financial difficulty and indicates that it will be unable
48
Note that impairments tests are conducted only for debt investments that are held-for-collection
(which are accounted for at amortized cost). Other debt and equity investments are measured at
fair value each period; thus, an impairment test is not needed.
ILLUSTRATION
IFRS17-11
Investment Cash Flows
Contractual
Cash Flows
Expected
Cash Flows
Loss of
Cash Flows
2014
2015
2016
2017
$ 20,000
20,000
20,000
220,000
$ 16,000
16,000
16,000
216,000
$ 4,000
4,000
4,000
4,000
$280,000
$264,000
$16,000
Dec. 31
As indicated, the expected cash flows of $264,000 are less than the contractual cash flows
of $280,000. The amount of the impairment to be recorded equals the difference between
the recorded investment of $200,000 and the present value of the expected cash flows, as
shown in Illustration IFRS17-12.
ILLUSTRATION
IFRS17-12
Computation of
Impairment Loss
Recorded investment
Less: Present value of $200,000 due in 4 years at 10%
(Table 6-2); FV(PVF4,10%); ($200,000 3 .68301)
Present value of $16,000 interest receivable annually
for 4 years at 10% (Table 6-4); R(PVF-OA4,10%);
($16,000 3 3.16986)
$200,000
$136,602
50,718
Loss on impairment
187,320
$ 12,680
The loss due to the impairment is $12,680. Why isnt it $16,000 ($280,000 2 $264,000)? A
loss of $12,680 is recorded because Mayhew must measure the loss at a present value
amount, not at an undiscounted amount. Mayhew recognizes an impairment loss of $12,680
by debiting Loss on Impairment for the expected loss. At the same time, it reduces the
overall value of the investment. The journal entry to record the loss is therefore as follows.
Loss on Impairment
Debt Investments
12,680
12,680
ON THE HORIZON
At one time, both the FASB and IASB have indicated that they believe that all financial
instruments should be reported at fair value and that changes in fair value should be
reported as part of net income. However, the recently issued IFRS indicates that the
IASB believes that certain debt investments should not be reported at fair value. The
IASBs decision to issue new rules on investments, prior to the FASBs completion of its
deliberations on financial instrument accounting, could create obstacles for the Boards
in converging the accounting in this area.