Transient Power Characteristics of Balanced Three-Phase Variable Inductance
Transient Power Characteristics of Balanced Three-Phase Variable Inductance
Transient Power Characteristics of Balanced Three-Phase Variable Inductance
2, 2001
Translated from Denki Gakkai Ronbunshi, Vol. 120-D, No. 5, May 2000, pp. 694700
50
impedance becomes inductance Lo at very high frequencies. simulations. In the remainder of this section, the following
In this paper, the parameters of the controller will be de- assumptions are considered for simplicity:
cided by trial and error so that the driving point impedance
becomes stable. Therefore, in the following theoretical 1. The circuit under consideration becomes steady-
analysis, the VAPAR is assumed to be an ideal variable state before the inductance change of the balanced three-
inductance. phase variable inductance.
Integrating the voltage equation of a variable induc- 2. The amplitude and phase of the voltage or current
tance as expressed by Eq. (1), we obtain source do not change.
51
The instantaneous active power pv and reactive power qv Substituting Eq. (8) for iD, iE in Eq. (9), pi and qi can be
flowing into the three-phase inductance are expressed by calculated as follows:
the following equation, where [iD, iE] are the currents in DE
coordinates:
(10)
Substituting Eq. (5) for vD, vE in Eq. (6), pv and qv are 1. The instantaneous active power changes only dur-
expressed by the following equation, since dc components ing the inductance change and is proportional to the time
can be neglected based on assumption 1) above: derivative of the inductance.
2. The instantaneous reactive power varies in propor-
tion to the inductance.
(7)
The above results are summarized in Table 1.
52
Fig. 6. Simulation results of power response of balanced three-phase variable inductance
(connected with ideal voltage and current source).
3.4 Transient power characteristics of they can be estimated from the theoretical results when a
balanced three-phase variable inductance voltage or current source is connected, according to the
in a more general case condition of the circuit. Figure 7 shows the simulation
results for the circuit shown in Fig. 5(c). In Figs. 7(a) and
Consider a balanced three-phase variable inductance 7(b), Rx is 25 : which is somewhat larger than the imped-
connected to a three-phase voltage source with a series ance of the variable inductance generated by the VAPAR (5
three-phase resistance as shown in Fig. 5(c). In this case, it mH:1.57 : at 50 Hz, 10 mH:3.14 : at 50 Hz) so that a
is difficult to solve for the active and the reactive power of similar response to the case in which a current source is
a three-phase variable inductance analytically. However, connected can be obtained. The difference between Figs.
53
7(a) and 7(b) is the speed of inductance change. When the
speed is slow, we can observe waveforms more similar to
the case in which a current source is connected. In Fig. 7(c),
Rx is 2.5 :, which is almost the same as the impedance of
the variable inductance. In this case, a response intermedi-
ate between the case of connection to a voltage source and
that of connection to a current source can be observed.
4. Experiments
54
Figure 9 shows the experimental results. Panel (a)
corresponds to the simulation shown in Fig. 6(a). Panels
(b) and (c) correspond to Figs. 7(a) and 7(b), respec-
tively. In the experimental results, the reactive power q
Fig. 10. Circuit which has voltage transfer function.
is shown reversed for convenience of measurement.
Some ripples can be observed in the experimental wave-
form due to the switching ripples of the inverter, and in
addition there are some distortions in the power response
due to the harmonics of the utility. However, the experi- such as a two-port circuit and feedback control system.
mental results agree well with the theoretical analysis Therefore, we cannot distinguish clearly whether the cur-
and simulation. rent is an input and the voltage is an output, or vice versa.
Considering a feedback speed control system, the speed
5. Conclusions reference is always the input and the real speed is always
the output. In another case such as the two-port circuit as
This paper has dealt with the transient power charac- shown in Fig. 10, we can derive a transfer function G which
teristics of a balanced three-phase variable inductance real- is the ratio of the output to an isolated input. In contrast,
ized by a VAPAR which is applicable to power circuits. The consider a one-port element such as an inductance with
summary findings are as follows. a driving point impedance function Z NZ / DZ connected
to a current source I as shown in Fig. 11(a). The terminal
1. The concept of variable inductance and its basic voltage V is
characteristics compared to fixed inductance has been dem-
onstrated.
2. The transient power characteristics of a balanced (11)
three-phase variable inductance connected to a three-phase
voltage or a three-phase current source have been analyzed The current I is determined as a function of the current
theoretically. The results are summarized in Table 1. source. The voltage V is determined from the current and
3. In general, the transient power characteristics of the driving point impedance. In this case, the current corre-
a balanced three-phase variable inductance can be esti- sponds to the input and the voltage to the output. The
mated according to the condition of the circuit from the stability of this circuit is judged by the poles of the driving
theoretical results when a voltage or current source is point impedance.
connected. On the other hand, when the voltage source is con-
4. Experiments were performed to verify the theoreti- nected as shown in Fig. 11(b), the current I is given by
cal analyses and simulations.
APPENDIX
55
stability of this circuit is judged by the zeros of the driving 2. Funato H, Kawamura A, Kamiyama K. Realization
point impedance. of negative inductance using variable activepassive
Thus, in the case of a one-port element, the input reactance (VAPAR). IEEE Trans Power Electron
output relation changes from case to case. In general, we 1997;12:589596.
should consider a circuit in which one port element is 3. Watanabe T, Funato H, Kamiyama K. Power flow
connected to a voltage source with an internal impedance control using variable activepassive reactance (VA-
as shown in Fig. 11(c). When the source impedance Zx is PAR): Comparison with phase shifter. 1997 IEE Ja-
small, this circuit shows a similar response to circuit (a), but pan Annual Meeting, No. 942.
it shows a similar response to circuit (b) when Zx is large. 4. Ishikawa T, Funato H, Ohtaki T, Kamiyama K. Trans-
Therefore, it is difficult to distinguish which (the voltage or mission power control using variable inductance with
current) is the input and which is the output. Thus, a driving feedforward- and feedback-based power controllers.
point impedance function has different characteristics than IEEE Int Conference on Power Electronics and Drive
a transfer function. Systems (PEDS99), Vol. 1, p 4651, Hong Kong.
The stability of a driving point impedance must be 5. Sato T. Electric circuits. Maruzen; 1973. p 9294. (in
considered with special care. As seen from the above exam- Japanese)
ple, both poles and zeros are concerned with stability. 6. Takebe T. Circuit response. Corona Publishing; 1981.
Considering general cases, a driving point impedance func- p 8283. (in Japanese)
tion becomes stable when all zeros and poles are on the left 7. Sato R. Electric circuit theory. Maruzen; 1973. p.
half of the complex plane [79]. 281285. (in Japanese)
8. Takebe T. Circuit response. Corona Publishing; 1981.
p 99100. (in Japanese)
9. Koga T. Circuit synthesis. Corona Publishing; 1981.
REFERENCES
Chapter 3. (in Japanese)
10. Akagi H, Kanazawa Y, Fujita K, Nabae A. General-
1. Funato H, Kawamura A. Activepassive power cir- ized theory of the instantaneous reactive power and
cuit. Trans IEE Japan Ind Appl 1993;113:601610. its applications. Trans IEE Japan 1983;103-B:483
(in Japanese) 490. (in Japanese)
Hirohito Funato received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from Yokohama National University
in 1987, 1989, and 1995. He was affiliated with Tokyo Electric Power Company as a communications engineer from 1989 to
1991. He joined Utsunomiya University in 1995, and is now an associate professor. His research interests include applications
of power electronics, motor drives, active filters, and so on. He is a member of IEEE PELS, IAS, IES, and SICE.
Kenzo Kamiyama received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering and Ph.D. degree from Waseda University
in 1959, 1961, and 1983. In 1961 he joined Hitachi Works, Hitachi, Ltd., where he worked on the development of
adjustable-speed dc motor drives for rolling mills. In 1970 he transferred to Omika Works, Hitachi, Ltd., where he worked on
the development of dc and ac motor drives for rolling mills and general industries. He has been responsible for developing
computer-aided design, direct digital simulations, thyristor motor speed regulators, rotor chopper control equipment for
induction motors, and microprocessor-based speed regulators for dc and ac motors. Since 1992 he has been a professor in the
Electrical and Electronics Engineering Department at Utsunomiya University. His research interests include ac drives and the
application of power electronics to motor drives. He is a member of SICE and a fellow of IEEE.
56
AUTHORS (continued)
Atsuo Kawamura received his B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of
Tokyo in 1976, 1978, and 1981. In 1981 he joined the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering of the University
of MissouriColumbia as a postdoctoral fellow, and was an assistant professor there from 1983 through 1986. In 1986 he joined
the faculty of Yokohama National University, where he is now a professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer
Engineering. His interests include power electronics, digital control, ultrasonic actuators, electric vehicles, robotics, and so on.
He received an IEEE IAS Transaction Prize Paper Award in 1988, and a Prize Paper Award from IEE Japan in 1996. He is a
senior member of IEEE, IEICE, SICE, and the Robotics Society of Japan.
57