Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Giuffre V Maxwell Dershowitz Declaration To Intervene

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 18
At a glance
Powered by AI
The declaration discusses Alan Dershowitz's representation of Jeffrey Epstein and Virginia Giuffre's allegations against him, which he denies. He is seeking to intervene in the case and access certain sealed documents.

Alan Dershowitz is submitting this declaration in support of his motion to intervene in the case and access certain sealed documents relating directly to him.

Virginia Giuffre has accused Alan Dershowitz of having sex with her and other young girls when she was underage, which he denies as false and fabricated.

Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 363 Filed 08/11/16 Page 1 of 18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

VIRGINIA GIUFFRE,
Index No. 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS)
Plaintiff,

-against-
DECLARATION OF
GHISLAINE MAXWELL, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ

Defendant.

ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ declares under penalty of perjury that the following

is true and correct:

1. I am a Professor of Law, Emeritus, at Harvard Law School, where I taught

criminal law, legal ethics and other subjects for 50 years. As a criminal defense attorney, I have

also represented numerous individuals accused of crimes over the course of my career. I am

personally familiar with the facts set forth in this declaration.

2. I submit this Declaration in support of my motion for permissive intervention

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(b), and to unseal certain judicial documents, or

alternatively to modify the stipulated Protective Order in this. The documents I am seeking

relate directly to me. The plaintiff in this case, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, through her counsel

and in publicly-filed declarations, has accused me of having sex with her and other young girls.

The allegation is utterly falsea fabrication from start to finishbut, because I am a

well-known law professor and lawyer, it has been widely covered and repeated in the press, both

here and around the world. See 13-14, 26-27, infra.

1
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 363 Filed 08/11/16 Page 2 of 18

3. In this application, I am seeking modest and narrowly tailored relief: an Order

unsealing three documents that were filed with the Court in this case. Specifically, I seek to

unseal

In the

alternative, I seek an Order lifting the stipulated Protective Order with respect to these three

documents (the Requested Documents). are attached hereto collectively as Exhibit

A, is attached hereto as Exhibit B, and is attached hereto as

Exhibit M. In accordance with the Protective Order, I am filing the Requested Documents under

seal, and redacting all substantive references to them, pending disposition of this application.

Although I have erred on the side of strict confidentiality to avoid any semblance of violating the

Courts Protective Order, I of course do not believe that these materials should remain sealed

permanently. In the event the Court grants my application, I would also request that the Court

unseal the Requested Documents along with all of the references to them in my motion papers

that are being redacted from the public docket.

4.

2
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 363 Filed 08/11/16 Page 3 of 18

5. I have been a lawyer and law professor in the public eye for more than 50 years,

and I have been happily married for 30 years. Even as I have taken on unpopular causes and

asserted controversial positions, I have always enjoyed a deserved reputation for rectitude in my

personal life. The false allegations lodged by Ms. Giuffre and her lawyers have sullied my

reputation unfairly. At nearly 78 years of age, I am determined to restore my reputation

My Representation of Jeffrey Epstein

6. Jeffrey Epstein, a financier who was accused of soliciting sex workers and having

inappropriate sexual conduct with underage girls, was a client of mine. I first was introduced to

Mr. Epstein by a friend, Lynn Forester de Rothschild, in 1997. Over the years, I attended a

number of academic events where he and many othersincluding distinguished academics,

business people, and otherswere present. At no timeeither then or after I became his

lawyerdid I ever see Mr. Epstein in the presence of underage girls, nor was I aware of any

allegation of improper sexual conduct on his part prior to being retained as one of his lawyers.

7. Mr. Epstein retained me as a criminal defense lawyer towards the end of 2006. I

was hired as part of a team of lawyers that included Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt, Kenneth Starr,

Martin Weinberg, and several others. In 2008, Mr. Epstein pleaded guilty to certain offenses

involving sex with minors.

8. Virginia Roberts Giuffre, the plaintiff in this action, has alleged that she was one

of Mr. Epsteins victims. Ms. Giuffre has claimed that she was held as a sex slave and

trafficked by Mr. Epstein, and that a number of men associated with Mr. Epstein had sexual

3
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 363 Filed 08/11/16 Page 4 of 18

encounters with her that Mr. Epstein facilitated. Mr. Epsteins criminal conviction involved his

conduct with respect to other girls; he was neither charged nor convicted in connection with his

conduct toward Ms. Giuffre.

9. Years after Mr. Epsteins guilty plea, as detailed below, Ms. Giuffre falsely

claimed that I was one of the men to whom Mr. Epstein trafficked her. The actions that Ms.

Giuffre attributes to me did not occur. Indeed, they could not have: my travel, work, and cell

phone records, together with other documentary evidence, prove that I could not have been in

locations in which she claims to have had sexual contact with me, including Little St. James,

New Mexico, Mr. Epsteins home in Palm Beach, and Mr. Epsteins private jet. These records

and other evidence prove that I was not at any of those locations during the years Ms. Giuffre

says she was with Mr. Epstein.

2006-2011: Ms. Giuffre Does Not Accuse Me of Sexual Misconduct In Her Initial Accounts

10. The first time Ms. Giuffre publicly accused me of sexual misconduct was in

December 2014by her own account, more than 12 years after her last encounter with Jeffrey

Epstein. In the intervening period, of course, a number of important things happened: Ms.

Giuffre had sued Mr. Epstein; she had been paid to sell her story to the media; she had drafted

and sought to publish a tell-all memoir 1; and Mr. Epstein had been investigated by law

enforcement, charged, and pled guilty to offenses related to sex with minors. I discuss these and

related circumstances because they reflect on Ms. Giuffres lack of credibility when it comes to

her allegations against me, and on the need for me to have unencumbered access to and use of

the Requested Documents as I seek to restore my personal and professional reputation.

1
See Richard Shears & Martin Robinson, Prince Andrews sex slave Virginia Roberts is writing a tell-all memoir
about their alleged trysts at home of US billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, DAILYMAIL.COM, Jan. 6, 2015
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2897615/Prince-Andrew-s-sex-slave-Virginia-Roberts-writing-tell-
memoir.html.

4
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 363 Filed 08/11/16 Page 5 of 18

11. During the criminal investigation of Mr. Epstein, which spanned the years 2006

through 2008, Ms. Giuffre was interviewed by law enforcement and provided details about Mr.

Epsteins alleged criminal acts. At the time, I was one of Mr. Epsteins lawyers. Ms. Giuffre did

not allege to law enforcement that I engaged in sexual misconduct of any sort. According to the

Assistant United States Attorney in charge of negotiating Mr. Epsteins plea arrangement, while

he was at the U.S. Attorneys Office, Ms. Giuffre never mentioned me as having been involved

in any sexual misconduct, much less suggested that she had been trafficked to me by Mr.

Epstein. The Assistant United States Attorney told me and my lawyer that, had such an

allegation been lodged, the Government would not have permitted me to continue to represent

Jeffrey Epstein, nor would I have been ethically permitted to do so.

12. In May 2009, Ms. Roberts filed a civil suit against Mr. Epstein, in which she

alleged that Mr. Epstein required that she be sexually exploited by Defendants adult male

peers, including royalty, politicians, academicians, businessmen, and/or other professional and

personal acquaintances. Again, the 2009 lawsuit did not mention me as an alleged perpetrator.

See Ex. C (Complaint, Jane Doe No. 102 v. Epstein, No. 09-80656 (S.D. Fla.)).

13. In or around early 2011, Sharon Churcher, a reporter for the British tabloid The

Daily Mail, contacted Ms. Giuffre and then traveled to Australia to meet with her in person.

(These contacts, and the existence of emails between Ms. Giuffre and Ms. Churcher in 2011,

were discussed and disclosed in documents publicly filed in this case, see, e.g., ECF Nos.

216-218, as part of the motion to quash Ms. Churchers deposition subpoena.) Ultimately, the

Daily Mail published a series of stories, under Ms. Churchers by-line, about Ms. Giuffres

involvement with Mr. Epstein. Nowhere did the Churcher stories allege that I had engaged in

5
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 363 Filed 08/11/16 Page 6 of 18

sexual misconduct. As far as the published stories reveal, Ms. Giuffre never mentioned me in

any of the interviews as someone with whom she had had sex.

14.

December 2014 Forward: Ms. Giuffre and Her Lawyers Accuse Me

15. Ms. Giuffre first made accusations against me after she retained Bradley Edwards

and Paul Cassell as her attorneys.

16. In December 2014, Ms. Giuffre, represented by Messrs. Edwards and Cassell,

filed a motion to join an action that had been initially filed in the United States District Court for

the Southern District of Florida in 2008 by one of Mr. Epsteins alleged victims, who was

designated as Jane Doe. Jane Doe #1 v. United States (Doe v. United States), No. 08-80736-

CIV-MARRA (S.D. Fla.). That action (the CVRA Action), which was brought under the

federal Crime Victims Rights Act, sought to challenge federal prosecutors handling of plea

negotiations with Mr. Epstein.

17. Between late 2014 and early 2015, Ms. Giuffres attorneystwo of the same

lawyers who represent her in this casealleged in court filings that I had had sex with Ms.

Giuffre on numerous occasions while she was a minor, including in Florida, on Mr. Epsteins

private planes, in the British Virgin Islands, in New Mexico, and in New York. They did not

offer to prove these allegations or offer me an opportunity to dispute them; they simply inserted

6
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 363 Filed 08/11/16 Page 7 of 18

them in the pleadings. While Ms. Giuffres attorneys could have made the filings under seal (as

much of the case file is sealed already), they elected to make the accusations against me part of

the public record, intending, I believe, that they be widely reported.

18. The allegations lodged against me were detailed, horrific, and utterly false. In

two further court filings in the CVRA Action in or around early 2015, Ms. Giuffre provided

perjurious declarations alleging that I had sex with her at least six times while when she was

between the ages of sixteen and nineteen. She alleged that the sex occurred in New Mexico,

New York, on Little St. James Island, in Mr. Epsteins house in Palm Beach, and on a private

plane. She also falsely alleged that I had sex with other underage girls. Finally, Ms. Giuffre

claimed that I was so comfortable with the sex that was going on that I would chat with Epstein

while she was giving him oral sex. All of this is categorically false. 2

19. In April 2015, U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra, the judge presiding over the

CVRA Action, struck the allegations against me from Ms. Giuffres filings under to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 12(f). Judge Marra called the allegations against me immaterial and

impertinent, and characterized striking the lurid details from Petitioners submissions as a

sanction. See Ex. D (Order Denying Petitioners Motion to Join Under Rule 21 and Motion to

Amend Under Rule 15, Apr. 7, 2015, Doe v. United States, ECF No. 324).

20. Since she first accused me of sexual misconduct in her filings in the CVRA

Action, Ms. Giuffre has stood by these accusations against me and repeated them numerous

times.

2
Even some of Ms. Giuffres factual allegations concerning time she spent with Mr. Epstein have been undermined
by the discovery of contrary facts. At one point, she asserted that she had been with Mr. Epstein before she turned
sixteen, having met him after her father began working at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach. Later, it emerged
that her father did not start working at the club until well after her sixteenth birthday.

7
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 363 Filed 08/11/16 Page 8 of 18

2015-2016: The Defamation Case Brought by Ms. Giuffres Lawyers Against Me

21. Having been falsely accused, in public documents, of sexual misconduct, I

publicly defended myself, including by asserting that the lawyers representing Ms. Giuffre had

not properly investigated her (false) allegations against me. In January 2015, Ms. Giuffres

attorneysMr. Edwards and Mr. Cassell, two of the same lawyers who are representing her in

the case at barsued me for defamation in a case styled as Edwards v. Dershowitz, Case No.

CACE 15-000072 (Cir. Ct., Broward Cnty., Fla.) The lawyers alleged that I had defamed them

by publicly stating that it was improper and unethical for them, as officers of the court, to accuse

me of sexual misconduct in public court filings without having appropriately investigated Ms.

Giuffres allegations. I countersued, alleging that their claims about my supposed sexual

encounters with Ms. Giuffre were defamatory.

22. During discovery in the Edwards v, Dershowitz case, I subpoenaed Ms. Giuffre,

requesting that she produce, among other items, [a]ll statements, written or recorded, which you

have provided to anyone that reference by name, Alan M. Dershowitz. See Ex. E (Subpoena to

Attend and Produce, Req. No. 7). Ms. Giuffre objected to this request and refused to comply,

ultimately moving to quash the subpoena. See Ex. F (Motion to Quash) at 7-9 & n.2. On

November 4, 2015, the judge in Edwards v. Dershowitz granted certain aspects of Ms. Giuffres

motion to quash, but otherwise denied it, including with respect to Request 7. See Ex. N (Email

Concerning Court Orders, Edwards v. Dershowitz, Case No. CACE 15-000072 (Cir. Ct.,

Broward Cnty., Fla.)), Nov. 4, 2015).

8
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 363 Filed 08/11/16 Page 9 of 18
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 363 Filed 08/11/16 Page 10 of 18

Ms. Giuffre and Her Lawyers Stand By Her False Allegations Against Me Even After
the Settlement of Edwards v. Dershowitz

26. Despite the settlement in the defamation case, Judge Marras order striking the

allegations in the CVRA Action, and the results of Judge Freehs investigation, Ms. Giuffre and

her counsel have republished Ms. Giuffres allegations against me. On April 8, 2016, just after

the settlement of the Edwards case, Mr. Cassell and Mr. Edwards made a court filing that stated

that Ms. Giuffre reaffirms her allegations against me, and that their mistake in filing those

allegations in the CVRA Action was merely tactical. See Ex. J (Notice of Withdrawal). David

Boies, another of Ms. Giuffres attorneys in this case, was described as saying that Ms. Giuffre

stands by her allegations against me. See Casey Sullivan, Alan Dershowitz Extends Truce

Offer to David Boies Amid Bitter Feud, BLOOMBERG LAW (Apr. 11, 2016),

https://bol.bna.com/alan-dershowitz-extends-truce-offer-to-david-boies-amid-bitter-feud/.

Reckless statements like thesewhich falsely imply that I am guilty of sexual misconductare

highly injurious to my reputation, especially when they come from otherwise-credible lawyers. 5

27. The claim that I engaged in sexual misconduct with Ms. Giuffre has also

continued to receive attention in the press, despite the settlement and the joint statement released

as a result thereof. See Ex. K (Compendium of News Stories). I am aware of at least two books

that have been or will soon be published that discuss the allegations against me; one of these

books, advertised in a press release just this week as expos[ing] one of the most sordid human

rights violation stories in the history of the United States, is being marketed as following [o]n

the heels of the sensational Alan Dershowitz defamation settlement case. Press Release,

TrafficKing: Conchita Sarnoffs Human Trafficking Book Is Now Available, NEWSWIRE.COM ,

5
I have compiled records of my whereabouts for the years in question, and these records show that I could not have
been in the places that Ms. Giuffre alleges I was at the times she alleges.

10
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 363 Filed 08/11/16 Page 11 of 18

Aug. 9, 2016, https://www.newswire.com/news/conchita-sarnoffs-book-trafficking-is-now-

available-1384303. See also Richard Johnson, Epstein Sex Scandal Book Clears Bill Clinton,

Page Six, Dec. 1, 2015, http://pagesix.com/2015/12/01/epstein-sex-scandal-book-clears-bill-

clinton/ (discussing a book about the Jeffrey Epstein sex slavery scandal [that] will be published

with the help of best-selling author James Patterson and referring to allegations that

Dershowitz had sex with Ms. Giuffre). And I have learned that following the filing of the false

accusations against me Ms. Giuffre sat for an interview with ABC News, as part of her efforts to

increase public interest in (and the commercial value of) her story. The interview was

announced on social media by an organization with which Mr. Edwards is associated and was

said to be slated to appear on ABCs Good Morning America, World News Tonight, and

Nightline programs. While the ABC News interview has not yet run, there is no assurance that it

will not run in the future. Moreover, Ms. Giuffres willingness to sit for press interviews

undermines any suggestion she might make that she has an ongoing interest in keeping her

allegations of sexual abuse private.

This Case, My Involvement as a Witness, and My Discovery of Exculpatory Materials

28. As the Court knows, in 2015, Ms. Giuffre filed this action against Ghislaine

Maxwell, a friend of Jeffrey Epstein. The suit alleges that Ms. Maxwell defamed Ms. Giuffre by

denying that she, Ms. Maxwell, facilitated the trafficking of Ms. Giuffre and other girls and

young women.

29. In or about May 2016, I was named as a witness in this case by both plaintiff and

defendant.

11
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 363 Filed 08/11/16 Page 12 of 18

30. Thereafter, I was contacted by defense counsel Ms. Laura Menninger, who said

that she wanted me to testify. Ms. Menninger informed me that a stipulated Protective Order

(the Protective Order) had been entered in this case, see Ex. L, under which discovery

materials could be designated by either party as confidential. She asked me to read the

Protective Order and to agree in writing to abide by its terms, which I did. The Protective Order

allows documents that were produced in discovery and that have been designated confidential

to be shown to potential witnesses.

31. To the best of my knowledge, the Protective Order is a blanket confidentiality

agreement that has been so-ordered by this Court. Accordingly, it is likely that the documents

designated as confidential under the Protective Order have not been individually scrutinized by

this Court to determine whether the designation is proper and/or that they are truly entitled to

confidential treatment under the law in this Circuit.

32.

33.

34.

12
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 363 Filed 08/11/16 Page 13 of 18
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 363 Filed 08/11/16 Page 14 of 18
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 363 Filed 08/11/16 Page 15 of 18

41.

Need for Public Access

42. The Requested Documents I am seeking by this application are

43.

a.

b.

15
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 363 Filed 08/11/16 Page 16 of 18
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 363 Filed 08/11/16 Page 17 of 18

f.

44.

45. Ms. Giuffre has long been a willing and active participant in the publication and

dissemination of her accusations. Indeed, according to documents publicly filed in the Edwards

case, she sold her story to the press for $160,000 in 2011. As relates to me, Ms. Giuffre

launched her continuing campaign of public character assassination by publicly filing false

allegations of sexual abuse against me, knowing and intending, I believe, that they would be

widely reported in the press. Most recently, she granted an interview to ABC News with the

intent that it be broadcast on national television.

sealing presumptively public court filings would be a perverse

mockery of the judicial system, the First Amendment, and fundamental fairness.

46. These materials are also essential to my defense against a motion to sanction me

brought against me Ms. Giuffre, via her lawyers at Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP, in connection

with the Edwards case. In that motion, Ms. Giuffre and her lawyers argue that I should be

sanctioned for submitting an affidavit and testifying (truthfully) about exculpatory comments

made to me by David Boies. After the parties in Edwards reached a settlement, Ms. Giuffre and

her lawyers insisted on pressing their sanctions motion against me. The motion was denied by

the trial judge, but Ms. Giuffre and her counsel have noticed and are pursuing an appeal.

17
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 363 Filed 08/11/16 Page 18 of 18

You might also like