Guide 2011
Guide 2011
Guide 2011
Stage 1:
Receipt of application from the Firms / Industries / Organisations and
Infrastructural projects for awarding Groundwater Availability Certificate.
1. 4 sets of Application for issuing Ground Water clearance will have to be addressed
only to Chief Engineer, SG&SWRDC Chennai -113, one set for the AD(G) concerned
for field survey and other two sets for the onward transmission to the SE / CE along
with the field report.
2. Application will have to be accepted based on the categorization of blocks (as per the
latest assessment).
3. Application will have to be sent to Superintending Engineer, concerned Ground Water
Circle, and CEs office along with the technical report.
4. However the receipt of the application is to be informed to CE office in the
monthly progress report in separate form.
5. No applications received by the CEs office directly with effect from 28.
01.2011.
Stage 2
Eligibility:
1. All the villages falling in the blocks come under the category of Safe and Semi critical vide
G.O. (Ms) No. 51 PW (R2) D Dated: 11.2.2004 is eligible for the purpose of study, subject to
satisfy all other technical norms as declared in different stages below.
(Ref: G.O. (Ms) No. 51 PW (R2) D Dated: 11.2.2004)
2. No schemes should be formulated in over exploited and critical blocks, and in semi critical
and safe blocks all the schemes should be formulated in consultation with State Ground and
Surface Water Resources Data Centre of Water Resources Organisation in Public Works
Department.(Ref: G.O. (Ms) No. 51 PW (R2) D Dated: 11.2.2004)
3.. ,
, 5 . 30.03.1989
() .213 1
14 .
(: (1) 223 & (3) 02.09.98.).
39
1. Distilleries
3. Fertilizer
5. Chemical units generating trade effluent containing such pollutants which may to pollute
air, water and land before treatment and those chemicals which may alter the environmental
quality by under going physical, chemical and biological transformation.
6. Petroleum Refinery
9. Ceramics
12. Pesticide
13. Asbestos
14. Foundries
4. ,
.
, , ,
,
,
.
()
.213 & 30.03.1989
.
40
2)
, , 5
.
( ) .
,
.
.
( : .127 & ( 3)
08.05.98.)
A. 1.Distilleries2. Tanneries, Sago, Sugar, Dairies and Glue3. Fertilizer4. Pulp & Paper
(with digestor)5. Chemical units generating trade effluent containing such pollutants which
may to pollute air, water and land before treatment and those chemicals which may alter
the environmental quality by under going physical, chemical and biological transformation.
6. Petroleum Refinery7. Textile Dyeing Units 8. Steel Plant (Electroplating, heat
treatment etc.)9. Ceramics10. Thermal Power Station11. Basic Drug Manufacturing
Units12. Pesticide13. Asbestos14. Foundries.(Ref: ANNEXURE I of G.O. Ms.No:213
E&F (EC-I) Dept. Dated: 30.3.89 )
Other industries in Ultra red, Red Orange and Green categories are notified in the G.O
Ms.No. 213 E&F (EC-1) Dept dated30.3.89.
B. The other industries other than mentioned above are comes under this category, and the
details are available in the: ANNEXURE I of G.O. Ms.No:213 E&F (EC-I) Dept. Dated:
30.3.89)
5. In coastal area ,proposal for extraction of groundwater with in 10 Km from the coast
such applications are to be rejected out rightly as there is an imminent danger of sea water
ingress into the land happening surely and rapidly in the coastal area leading towards the
energized drawal structure when once such a drawal structure is permitted for pumping of
ground water in large quantities as requested by the Firms/Industries / Organisations for their
usage. Obviously, such a proposition simply can not be entertained by paying such a costly
price of damaging our invaluable resources of land and water in the coastal area perennially.
41
Now, the question here is how far from the sea coast we must prohibit the establishment
of such Ground Water development by any Firm/Industry/Organisation for its running. To find
out the answer or to have a feedback for the decision, we have to turn towards the past
history of such similar cases of ground water drawals carried out in the coastal region. In
those cases, we have one prominent out - standing example of relentless ground water
drawal made in Minjur and Panchatti areas which ultimately resulted in the untoward
incidence of sea-water intrusion into the land to an unexpected all-time high distance of 16
KM.
Therefore, in order to be very practical and reasonable, the border-line or the line of
separation of zones is hereby safely fixed at a perpendicular distance of 10 KM from the sea-
coast beyond which only any Ground Water drawal proposal should be considered for
processing for award and all other ground water development proposals falling within the 10
KM range from the sea-coast should be rejected at the outset.
Henceforth, the above stipulation should be strictly adhered to in all the cases of
ground water drawal proposals processing without any lapse or deviation whatsoever.
6. The blocks fall under Palar basin Rules, the following areas are not eligible for abstraction
of Groundwater.
The purpose and objective of this regulatory instrument is to arrest unhealthy trend in the
exploitation of groundwater along the river course. The palar basin rules, as amended
recently in Government order M.S.1766 PWD dt.31.10.88 stipulates as follows.
1. The distance rule (i.e. distance between wells and river banks) shall be 200 meters and
this distance has to be computed from the banks of the River.
2.Only those survey fields which come within the prohibited distance of 200 meters ( and not
the entire village ) be subjected to Palar basin Rules.
3. The fields abutting spring heads or channels which were earlier in existence but now dried
up should not be subject to the rules.
Ref: Government order M.S.1766 PWD dt.31.10.88
4. The collectors of North Arcot (Presently Vellore & Thiruvannamalai) and Chengalpattu
(Presently Kancheepuram) are authorized to decide to which of these spring heads /
channels have become defunct.
7. The Extraction point falls within 50 meters from the canal are not eligible for abstraction of
Groundwater.
The applications which will fulfill the above conditions are only eligible for
processing under Stage 3.
42
Stage 3:
Documents to be submitted by the applicant.
In addition to the prescribed application which was forwarded from the Chief
Engineer office, the following documents to be obtained from the applicants by the field
officers, the Assistant Director (G) of the respective revenue District for processing the
application. They are,
1. Attested copy of registered land ownership document in the name of applicant (or) lease
agreement for a minimum period of 10 years in the name of applicant.
2. The latest encumbrance certificate showing the name of applicant for ascertaining the
ownership of the area. or lease
3. FMB Sketch
4. Not to scale topo sketch showing the location of wells and the industry.
7. The distance between the proposed well for groundwater extraction and nearest wells
and the depth of the wells to be certified by Revenue Inspector of concerned village.
8. The distance between the well proposed for extraction and nearest surface water body
such as tank, canal, Stream River etc. to be certified by Revenue Inspector of concerned
area.
9. The distance between the well proposed for extraction and the bank of Palar River
(Palar basin Rules) to be certified by Revenue Inspector of concerned area.
10. No objection Certificate from the concerned Village Panchayat for the proposed
quantity of ground water extraction and transportation of groundwater if any.
Stage 4:
Processing of Application Forms.
1. The application must full fill all the conditions laid down in Stage No.2 (Eligibility criteria) for
processing the same. Until otherwise it is returned immediately within 15 days.
2. The land in which the drawal wells have been proposed by an industry/organization for
issue of Ground Water Availability Certificate for drawal of Ground Water should either be the
own property of the owner / proprietor of the industry/organization registered in his name or a
leased property taken on lease by the owner/proprietor of the industry/organization in his
name and duly and properly registered, with the left over lease period on the day of receipt of
43
application from the industry/organization for issue of Ground Water availability certificate
afresh or for renewal of the certificate being more than 5 years. Other than these two types
of land and well ownership, no other mode of accessibility or permissibility of land and well
will entail the owner/proprietor of the industry/organization to claim for issue of Ground Water
Availability Certificate to his industry/organization.(Ref: CHIEF ENGINEERS CIRCULAR No. CE
1/2010/DD (G) / Dated 25.01.2010)
3. On receipt of documents from the applicants, the spacing certified by the Revenue
Inspector and the eligibility criteria are to be verified by the field officers on record.
(The spacing certificate furnished by the Revenue Inspector is meant only for processing the
applications and concerned Asst Director (Geology) and Executive Engineer should ascertain
in the field and this is to be certified in the report.)
4. Minimum spacing to be adopted between
1. Two dug wells : 150m
2. Two shallow tube wells : 175m
3. Two filter points : 175m
4. Two dug cum bore wells : 175m
5. Two medium tube wells : 600m
6. Two deep tube wells : 600m
7. Medium tube well and deep tube well : 600m
8. Shallow tube well & Medium tube well : 387.5m
9. Dug well and Shallow tube well : 162.5m
10. Dug well and Medium tube well : 375m
11. Dug well and Deep tube well : 375m
5. The blocks fall under Palar basin Rules, the following areas are not eligible for
abstraction of Groundwater. The purpose and objective of this regulatory instrument is to
arrest unhealthy trend in the exploitation of groundwater along the river course. The palar
basin rules, as amended recently in Government order M.S.1766 PWD dt.31.10.88 stipulates
as follows.
44
1.) The distance rule (i.e. distance between wells and river banks) shall be 200 meters and
this distance has to be computed from the banks of the River.
2.)Only those survey fields which come within the prohibited distance of 200 meters ( and not
the entire village ) be subjected to Palar basin Rules.
3.) The fields abutting spring heads or channels which were earlier in existence but now dried
up should not be subject to the rules. Ref: Government order M.S.1766 PWD dt.31.10.88
6. No groundwater availability survey to be carried out in the hamlets, village area or any
other habitations which will adversely affect the drinking water sources of the people, which
leads to local agitations.
7. The ownership of the well, spacing between the adjacent wells and distance to river,
canal etc. if any available nearby have to be ascertained( on record) by the Asst.Director,
Geo.Sub.Divn and verified by the Executive Engineer, Ground Water Division before giving
instructions to the applicant for remittance of fee for aquifer performance test. Before
collecting the fees for aquifer performance test, documents relating to ownership of the wells
like chitta adangal, FM sketch etc. (as stated in stage 3) are to be verified by Asst.Director,
(Geology) Ground Water Sub-divn and Executive Engineer, Groundwater Division and the
applications fulfill all the eligibility criteria, then the applicant to be informed for the remittance
of fees. (Service charges). Ref: C.E Lr.No.G8 / MISC/2006 dt.14.07.2006.
Stage -5
Collections of Service Charges.
If all the conditions are fulfilled as in stages 1 to 4 the service charges may be remitted
by the applicant as below.
Service charges of Rs.1,500/- (Rupees one thousand and five hundred only) per day
conducting one pumping test for issue of water availability certificate with stipulated spacing
condition of 150m between two wells and 200m away from the river bed.
If the pumping and recovery observation hours exceed 24 hours, an additional amount
of Rs.1,500/- may be collected for every subsequent day. Most of the pump test involves
more than 24 hours, including reconnaissance for 3 hours, Verification of distances on
spacing norms for 4 hours pumping test duration and thereafter observation of recuperation
of Groundwater there off. Hence the Department required collecting at least minimum of 2
days charges from the applicant and the maximum depends on the yield and quantum of
requirement. Besides, the party has to provide the transport and lifting service for conducting
the pump sets. Also it is to be ensured that on no account, the stipulated spacing condition of
150m between two wells is violated. Further, the pumping well should be stipulated at least
45
200 meters away from the river bed. Ref: G.O. Ms. No.281 Public Works Department Dated
03.04.1996.
Stage 6
Conducting Pumping Test and Preparation of Report.
1. The eligibility of the area for the pumping test is to thoroughly verify with the 6 conditions
mentioned in stage 2. If it is not fulfill the condition, the pump test need not be conducted and
the rejection report to be intimated at once.
2. Before making the hydrological survey in the study area, the spacing norm to be verified
thoroughly in the field with reference to pumping well / river beds / canal/ tanks and other
structures mentioned in stage 2 Eligibility.
The distance between the extraction points of TWAD / Local bodies such as wells, bore wells,
Galleries and the referred applicants drawal point is to be measured and the data of already
in extraction to be incorporated in report. Note:Spacing norms not applicable for domestic wells.
a. The distance rule (i.e. distance between wells and river banks) shall be 200 meters and
this distance has to be computed from the banks of the River.
b. Only those survey fields which come within the prohibited distance of 200 meters ( and not
the entire village ) be subjected to Palar basin Rules.
46
c. The fields abutting spring heads or channels which were earlier in existence but now dried
up should not be subject to the rules.(Ref: Government order M.S.1766 PWD dt.31.10.88).
In some case the AD(G) of GW sub Division / the Executive Engineers of Ground
Water Divisions while they come across cases non-compliance of spacing norms for drawal
well proposed by an industry/organization, they simply obtain a No Objection Certificate from
the third party whose well is within the objectionable distance, to the effect that this third
partly has no objection for the industry/organization to draw water from its own well for its own
use which well is situated within the spacing norms violation range to his well.
This is quite absurd as the spacing norms stipulation is prescribed only to weed out
the wells from drawal which are in violation of this stipulation just to ensure the sustainability
of Ground Water by way of avoiding the formation of closely spaced wells whose bulbs of
influence caused intersect one another. Therefore, this concern behind the stipulation
spacing norms for drawal wells should be borne in mind by the Executive Engineers of
Ground Water Divisions and dispense with the practice of obtaining such a NOC in this
issue. (Ref: CHIEF ENGINEERS CIRCULAR No. CE 1/2010/DD (G) / Dated 25.01.2010).
6. If equilibrium condition is not obtained, the test should be continued till the well attains
maximum draw down.
8. The long duration pump test must be conducted as possible with relevancy of nature of the
terrain and hydro geological conditions.
10. In order to allow sufficient time for recuperation the maximum allowable total hours of
drawal per day should be restricted to 8 hours at any cost.
47
11. This calculation is baseless and devoid of all merits because without 100% recuperation
within at least the same number hours as that of pumping done, one cannot hope that the
condition of equilibrium will prolong any longer.
In a simple way it may be understood that the number of hours of recommended drawal
and the number of hours taken for 100% recovery of entire draw down of Ground Water level
due to the drawal should not exceed 24 hours.
Moreover, it may be noted here, that even if equilibrium is reached, the pump test should
necessarily be conducted as usual for long duration as done in other cases where the
condition of equilibrium is not reached at all, and also the observation of recovery of draw
down should be continued till 100% recovery is reached or 24 hours have passed for both
drawal and recovery whichever is earlier and then only the allowable drawal of Ground Water
per day should be recommended based on the results of long duration pumping and
observation of recovery of draw down.
12. Instead, if the recovery is 95% and < 100 % within the said 24 hours, then only 90% or
less of the average yield per day should be recommended for drawal. Similarly, for 90%
and < 95 % only 83% or less and for 85% and < 90 % only 75% or less of the average yield
per day should be recommended. But, for any other percentage of recovery which is less
than 85% within the said 24 hours, no recommendation should be made for drawal in the
case of a bore well and the bore well may be dropped from consideration for recommendation
for drawal of water and some other bore well with better yield than this one may be taken for
consideration. However, dug wells with the recovery percentage up to 75% may be
considered for drawal. That is, if the recovery in a dug well is 75% < 85 % within the said 24
hours, then only 65% or less of the average yield per day should be recommended for
drawal. But, a dug well with less than 75% recovery should be dropped from consideration for
recommendation for drawal and some other dug well with a better yield should be selected for
consideration.
13. As any pump test conducted during the rainy season or just after the rainy season will
result in boosted allowable yield per day which yield can not be realized during peak summer
time, no pump test should be done during the three months of rainy season, namely, October,
November and December and also during the immediate succeeding month of January in a
year. However, the pump test may be carried out reliably during the balance eight months
period that is from February up to September of a year. (Note: The season of monsoon
period southwest and north east to be ascertained and confirmed by the field officers.)
48
14.As per the earlier instructions, the pump test for issuing the ground water clearance is to
be conducted only in the months of Feb to September, during the non monsoon period.
If the water column is less than 10 meters and there is non attaining of equilibrium in
the water level during pump test in the month of February, 50% of the actual pumping
the actual pumping quantity for eligible hours is to be recommended for clearance.
In the month of July and August, the last months of the post monsoon period, 100 % of
the actual pumping quantity for eligible hours is to be recommended for clearance.
If the water column is more than 10 meters and the well attains equilibrium in the water
level during pump test, 100% of the actual pumping quantity for eligible hours is to be
(Note: The season of monsoon period southwest and North east to be ascertained and
15. The Executive Engineers instead of recommending for longer hours of pumping than 8
hours form the limited acceptable drawal wells selected from the original list of wells furnished
by the industry/organization for conducting the pump test for issuing Ground Water
Availability Certificate, should ask the industry/organization to furnish further more drawal
wells for consideration for recommendation for drawal by way of drilling/digging further
number of bore wells/dug wells respectively so as to see that the recommended hours of
pumping in an individual well does not exceed 8 hours at any cost while accommodating the
16. If the firm/industry / organisation has either have already obtained the EB connection for
free power supply or have applied for the EB connection for free power supply for the Electric
49
Motor pump set for the well, then it has to furnish an undertaking to the Chief Engineer, PWD,
WRO, SG & SWRDC, Tharamani, Chennai 600 113 that in the event of the award of
Ground Water Availability Certificate for drawal of ground water for that well for its usage, the
firm/industry/organisation agrees to change the type of EB connection for the Electric Motor
pump-set for the well from the present free power supply category under Agricultural
These details as obtained in the above prescribed format accompanied with the
above mentioned documents of the Xerox copy of the EB card maintained for the Electric
Motor pump-set for the well and the undertaking obtained from the firm/industry/organisation
in original should be sent to this office for each and everyone of the proposed drawal wells in
which pump-test has been conducted and drawal of Ground Water recommended, by the
concerned Executive Engineer, Ground Water Division while he forwards the feasibility report
for award of ground water availability certificate to the firm/industry/organization. (Ref: CHIEF
17. If the quantity of drawal is more than 50,000 LPD, the field officers must take the technical
by inspections. In that cases the DD (G) of the groundwater circles must submit a technical
note on that case through their SEs .Even they can fix the programme with field officers
accordingly for presence during pumping test study. But by this way, delay in submission of
18. Before making recommendations in the report, total quantity of ground water to be
extracted for the eight months (the non monsoon period , ie LPD x30 days x 8 months) is to
be arrived and necessary certificate to be submitted along with the report stating that ,due to
the extraction of ground water as recommended for eight months ,(before the monsoon
commences) will not affect the present water users of the area.
19. The pump test report should be covered all the following items. If any of them is not
Report.
a) The first page of the report should be the abstract of the feasibility report and the
details are as follows:-
1. Name of the applicant :
2. Name of the village/block/dist. (well location) :
3. Category of the block(as per the latest
assessment). :
4. Name of the river basin :
5. Location of the well :
6. Survey No. with sub-divn :
7. Lat & Long of the well :
8. Referred structure (dug / bore well) :
9. No. of structures involved :
10. Depth of the well (from MP) :
c) List of Annexures.
4. Not to scale topo sketch showing the location of wells and the industry.
7. The distance between the proposed well for groundwater extraction and nearest wells
and the depth of the wells to be certified by Revenue Inspector of concerned village.
8. The distance between the well proposed for extraction and nearest surface water body
such as tank, canal, Stream River etc. to be certified by Revenue Inspector of concerned
area.
9. The distance between the well proposed for extraction and the bank of Palar River
(Palar basin Rules) to be certified by Revenue Inspector of concerned area.
10. No objection Certificate from the concerned Village Panchayat for the proposed
quantity of ground water extraction and transportation of groundwater if any.
(Ref: Lr. No. G8 / MISC / 2006 dated 14 .07.2006.)
18. The distance between the wells & to the tank .river, water bodies is to be measured and
certified only by departmental officers. The certificate issued by the revenue authorities is
only for the purpose of scrutiny of application that is to avoid the collection of service charges
from the applicants whose structure not having prescribed distance criteria.
19. Conducting aquifer performance test by the Ad (G) Geological sub division and submit the
report in hard copy and soft copy to Executive Engineer, GWD, as per the format with in a
weeks time.
Stage 7
Scrutiny of the Report:
1. The Executive Engineer, PWD, Groundwater Division send the field investigation report
with in a week time to Superintending Engineer of concerned circle
2. The Superintending Engineer is to scrutinize the report and send the remarks on this report
to CEs office with in 10 days on receipt of the report. The Superintending Engineer should
countersign in the recommendation in the Annexure C1 and submit to CES office for taking a
final decision on this report.
3. The report in hard copy & soft copy should reach the Chief Engineer, SG&SWDC within 2
weeks time from the date of conducting aquifer performance test.
4. The Executive Engineer, GWD and the Superintending Engineer / Deputy Director,
Ground Water Circle, have to inspect the site whenever and wherever it is necessary.
Stage 8
Decision on field report at CEs office:
A. Applications received under Tamil Nadu Groundwater (Development and
Management) Act 2003. (Pending establishment of Tamilnadu Groundwater
Authority).
Processing of the pump test report and analyzing the field data, by comparing with the
entire basin area, present extraction condition of the block area, previous NOC details ,
W.U.C clearances and after arriving the present % of extraction, hydro geological
parameters of the entire river basin area, and also considering the entire hydrological
condition of the area at Chief Engineers office and communicate the approval letter , or
otherwise to the individuals with a copy to SE , EE , AD (G) concerned for further action.
If the proposed drawal is 1 MGD and above, the proposal should be placed before the
Water Utilization Committee for consideration and clearance, vide G.O Ms.No.700 PW(WR2)
Department dated 18.10.96. The approval for a period of 3 years may be communicate to
the individuals with a copy to SE,EE, AD(G) concerned for further action.
undertakings obtained , if there are any, for each and everyone of the drawal wells for taking
necessary action at his end. However, in any case, the concerned Superintending Engineer,
TNEB of the Districts EB Circle would be marked a copy of the Ground Water Availability
Certificate awarded to the firm/industry/organization and would be recommended for taking
necessary action at his end as found suitable for the case.
Stage 9
Post Approval Action Plan:
1. If the proposal is approved either by the CE/SG&SWRDC the Executive Engineer,
Groundwater Division has to enter an agreement with the applicant as enclosed herewith.
2. The agreement to be sent to the Chief Engineer PWD after fulfilling the condition
that, all the applicants should handed over one bore well for observation of water level
purposes to the Groundwater PWD.
3. Whenever a firm / industry / organisation is awarded either anew or as renewal
heavy drawal of ground water by this department in the form of Ground Water Availability
Certificate, then right from the month of award of such drawal to the firm / industry /
organisation, water level has to be taken and recorded every month by observing it in the
premises where ground water is actually drawn by such firm / industry / organisation for its
usage and also water samples are also to be taken twice in a year during pre-monsoon and
post-monsoon periods from the same open well / borewell from which water level is observed
and water quality tests have to be carried out and recorded.
Based on the monthly water level observations so made, from the completion of
second year of permission onwards, for every year the average water level in a continuous
twelve months time which includes one pre-monsoon and one post-monsoon periods has to
be arrived and this average water level figure has to be compared with the corresponding
average water level figure so arrived for the initial year of drawal as allowed by this
department and the discrepancy has to be noted down. If the discrepancy so noted down
displays a ground water level decline of 10 metres or more, then it clearly points out that the
ground water table in that locality and nearby area is lowering down to alarming levels. In
such a situation, the Ground Water Availability Certificate / NOC / Groundwater clearance
awarded to the firm / industry / organisation has to be revised accordingly. Therefore, in such
a case, a detailed report in this regard has to be sent by the concerned Executive Engineer,
Ground Water Division to the Chief Engineers office through the concerned Superintending
Engineer, Ground Water Circle for issue of necessary revised Ground Water Availability
Certificate from this office to the firm / industry / organisation with scaling down of the drawal
level so as to maintain the sustainability of ground water in that area and around.
4.Further, whenever a firm / industry / organisation applies for renewal of the Ground
Water Availability Certificate issued to it earlier by this Department, which is
55
drawing10,00,000 or more litres of ground water per day as allowed by this department
previously, the concerned Executive Engineer, Ground Water Division should furnish the
entire monthly Ground Water level observations and the bi-yearly water quality observations
recorded by him for the past three years to the Chief Engineers office for scrutiny for taking
necessary action( Ref: CHIEF ENGINEERS CIRCULAR.No.CE 2/2010/DD (G) / Dated 19.03.2010).
6. It is a known fact that some of the firms/industries/organisations which apply to this Ground
Water Department and obtain the Ground Water Availability Certificate valid for three years
so as to apply to the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board and obtain its No Objection
afterwards to this Ground Water Wing to renew the validity of the Ground Water Availability
Certificate issued to them even after its expiry after three years. However, these
every year from the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board even after the expiry of the validity of
Ground Water Availability Certificate originally issued to them by this Ground Water Wing, by
conveniently suppressing this fact from the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board while applying
business/industry/activity surreptitiously.
56
Therefore, in order to put a check to the unauthorised tapping of Ground Water being
Water drawal validity of the Certificate and set them back on the right track of applying to this
Ground Water Wing for renewal of the Ground Water Availability Certificate on expiry of its
validity after three years, the Executive Engineers of all Ground Water Divisions of the
Ground Water Department are instructed to send a periodical report hereafter by 10th of every
month in the following format in this regard directly to this office for further action with a copy
marked to their respective Ground Water Circle, commencing from the forthcoming month.
Sl.No Name and Chief Engineers Date on The Circle/Zone and Remarks
Address of the office Letter.No which the the Division, Region
firm/industry/ and Date in which validity of of the Tamil Nadu
organisation which such a Ground the Ground Pollution Control
has not so far Water availability Water Board under which
renewed the Certificate or the Availability the firm/industry/
validity of the renewal of its Certificate organisation falls
Ground Water validity has been or its latest
Availability issued which is renewal got
Certificate on its not alive as on expired
expiry for which date in respect of
the Ground Water its validity period.
Availability
Certificate has
been issued by the
Ground Water
Department
Every month, on receipt of all such periodical reports from all the Ground Water Divisions of
the respective Ground Water Circle, the concerned Assistant Geologist at Chief Engineers
office of State Ground and Surface Water Resources Data Centre, Chennai should verify the
consolidated way with the register maintained by him in this regard and with the relevant files
in which Ground Water Availability Certificate/Renewal was accorded for each one of these
Nadu Pollution Central Board, Guindy, Chennai - 32 communicating him the confirmed list of
Certificates or their expired renewals, if any and requesting him to stop issuing any further
57
renewal of No objection certificate of the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board to all of them
until and otherwise a communication on the accordance of renewal of the Ground Water
Availability Certificate to them is received by him from this office, with copy marked to all the
In this connection, it may also be noted that for any firm/industry/organisation which
has originally got awarded the Ground Water Availability Certificate or the renewal when the
block in which the industry had proposed to draw or was drawing the Ground Water
respectively for its use was either in the safe or semi-critical category originally when the
certificate or its renewal was awarded to it and subsequently got classified under critical or
over-exploited category, there is no bar for considering the renewal application for the Ground
Water Availability Certificate to it and carrying out all the routine formalities and awarding the
Renewal Certificate on the Ground Water Availability to it as new schemes only should not be
developed in the critical and over-exploited blocks as per the G.O.(Ms).No.51 PW(R2)D
dt.11.2.2004, but the existing schemes are permitted to run as it is without any further
expansions or what-so-ever.( Ref: CHIEF ENGINEERS Circular. No. CE-4 /2010/ DD (G)
dated.17.05.2010)
The above procedures in all the 9 stages have to be adhered strictly to issue the
Groundwater Availability Certificate.
The following lists of annexures are to be given by the Executive Engineer / Groundwater
Division along with the report.
58
Annexure D1
Annexure D2
Certified that the spacing between the Applicant Thiru. --------------------s proposed pumping
well, located in T.S.No.-----------/ S.F. No. ------------- of village ---------------, Block -----------
1. First wells (in S.F No.) depth is --------------m and the spacing is-------- m,
2. Second wells (in S.F No.) depth is --------------m and the spacing is-------- m,
3. Third wells (in S.F No.) depth is -------------- m and the spacing is-------- m,
4. Fourth wells (in S.F No.) depth is --------------m and the spacing is-------- m,
5. Fifth wells (in S.F No.) depth is --------------m and the spacing is-------- m,
6. Sixth wells (in S.F No.) depth is --------------m and the spacing is-------- m,
Annexure D3
Certified that the spacing between the Applicant Thiru. --------------------s proposed
pumping well, located in T.S.No.-----------/ S.F. No. ------------- of village ---------------, Block
---------------------, District------------------and the Palar River Bank is above 200m vide above
And
Certified that the Applicant Thiru. --------------------s proposed pumping well, located
District------------------ does not fall with in the vicinity of 250 m from any public drinking
water sources.
Annexure D4
Certificate on Spacing between proposed pumping wells and Selected River banks.
(Vide G.O (1D) No.223 Environment & Forest (S3) Department dated 02.09.1998)
(Applicable only to the 14 types of industries cited in Annexure of G.O (Ms) No.213, for
Cauvery and its tributaries, Pennaiyaru, Palar, Vaigai & Thamiraparani Rivers
Certified that the spacing between the Applicant Thiru. --------------------s proposed pumping
well, located in T.S.No.-----------/ S.F. No. ------------- of village ---------------, Block -----------
----------, District------------------and the ----------- River Bank is ---------Km away from the
River -------------------------------vide above cited G.O. / does not applicable since Cauvery
and its tributaries, Pennaiyaru, Palar, Vaigai & Thamiraparani Rivers is far away ( more than
Annexure D5
Certified that the spacing between the Applicant Thiru. --------------------s proposed pumping
well, located in T.S.No.-----------/ S.F. No. ------------- of village ---------------, Block -----------
(Note: If the distance exceeds 10 km, exact distance need not be mentioned)
Annexure D6
Annexure D7
Annexure - Criteria for calculating the recommendation quantity on the basis of groundwater
development in the blocks from the quantity of puming test results of the individual wells.
ANNEXURE - III C1
(iv)Complete address
2 (i) Name of owner of land from
where well is proposed to be
constructed or used (if the applicant
himself is not the owner)
(ii) Address
17 DECLARATION
For arriving the quantity based on the pumping tests, the following factor has to be
strictly adhered while issuing the Ground water Availability Certificate.
Only the average yield quantity arrived from the actual pumping tests to be
considered for the recommendation purposes not the safe yield values arrived
in the pump test reports, since this department issuing ground water availability
certificate based on the pump tests actually conducted.
Even though the safe yield mentioned in the C1 form of the CG2011, it is
clarified that the safe yield is indicated for taking the average yield i.e average of
actual quantity measured by the field officers during the pump test.
For arriving the final quantity for the recommendation of issuing of groundwater
clearance in the report C!, C2 it is clearly/strictly instructed that the
assumption quantity, perception quantity, projected quantity by adding of
artificial recharge methods(Rainwater Harvesting) for calculation, assessment
based on the rainfall pattern etc., should not be considered at any cost. In
addition to that it is clearly informed, only average yield i.e average of actual
quantity measured by the field officers during the pump test to be considered
for recommendation purposes. Since the ground water clearance is always
subjected to RTI, High Court and Supreme Court cases etc., proper care
should be taken by the officer concerned, who is fully responsible for the
recommendation, to avoid further litigations in this regard.
The Superintending Engineer, of Ground Water Circle are requested send the
recommendation letter with C1 & C2 is soft copy also to this office by e- mail.
72
Form 1
Clients Name : Block :
Village : District :
Latitute : Longitute :
Well No : Survey No :
1 Well Type =
2 Stage of development in Block in % =
3 Total Depth of well =
4 Average Discharge/ACTUAL MEASUREMENT =
5 Pre test Water level =
6 Post test Water level =
7 Water level at the end of recouperation test =
8 Duration of recouperation test =
9 Is equilibirium attained =
10 Month of Pump test =
Abstract
73
Clients Name
Quantity Quantity
computed computed
based on based on
Well Well Survey Recommended
Village Latitute Longitude recouperation percentage
No. Type No. Quanity (lpd)
and month of of
pump test Development
(lpd) (lpd)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
CHIEF ENGINEER/SG&SWRDC