Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 655 views

    Semantics of The Verb Phrase

    Uploaded by

    Francis Smith

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Semantics of The Verb Phrase

    Uploaded by

    Francis Smith
    655 views1 page

    Original Title

    Semantics of the Verb Phrase.docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    655 views1 page

    Semantics of The Verb Phrase

    Uploaded by

    Francis Smith

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Semantics of the Verb Phrase

    Meaning of Verb Tenses

    We need to be careful when we talk about tense and time. Both terms tend to be confused especially
    when we refer to present time and present tense.
    On the one hand, if we follow Quirk, tense is a grammatical category realized by verb inflection. On the
    other hand, time is a universal, nonlinguistic concept with three types of reference: past, present and future
    whereas on the grammatical level, there are only two tenses: past and present. Some grammarians have
    argued for a third, future tense maintaining that English realizes this tense by the use of an auxiliary verb
    construction (such as will +infinitive), but we follow those grammarians, as Quirk who have treated tense
    strictly as a category realized by verb inflection. So, we do not talk about the future as a formal category, but
    what we do say is that certain grammatical constructions are capable of expressing the semantic category of
    future time.
    To make it clear, Quirk distinguishes three interpretations of past, present and future. First on a
    referential level: in abstraction from any given language, time can be thought of as a line (theoretically, of
    infinite length) on which is located, as a continuously moving point, the present moment. Anything ahead of the
    present moment is in the future, and anything behind it is in the past.
    Second, on the semantic level of interpretation, where we relate this view of time to language, and
    more precisely to the meaning of verb, the present is defined in an inclusive rather than in an exclusive way,
    allowing for the possibility that its existence may also stretch into the past and into the future.
    Hence, Paris stands on the River Seine may be correctly said to describe a present state of affairs,
    even though this state of affairs has also obtained for numerous centuries in the past and may well exist for an
    indefinite period in the future.
    On this second semantic level of interpretation, the present is the most general and unmarked
    category.
    Lastly, present and past are also interpreted on a grammatical level in reference to tense. Future is
    not included in this category for the reason already mentioned.

    You might also like