Theory X and Y
Theory X and Y
Theory X and Y
They
were created and developed by Douglas McGregor
According to the models, the two opposing sets of general assumptions of how workers
are motivated form the basis for two
managers believe their employees are less intelligent than the managers are
manager believes that all actions should be traced and the responsible individual given
a direct reward or a reprimand according to the action's outcomes
here are two opposing approaches to implementing Theory X; the "hard" approach and
the "soft" approach. The hard approach depends on close supervision, intimidation,
and imminent punishment.
The soft approach is the literal opposite, characterized by leniency and less strictly
regulated rules in hopes for high workplace morale and therefore cooperative
employees.
mployees are considered to be one of the most valuable assets to the company, and
truly drive the internal workings of the corporation
that these particular employees thrive on challenges that they may face, and relish on
bettering their personal performance. Workers additionally tend to take full
responsibility for their work and do not require the need of constant supervision in order
to create a quality and higher standard product
In comparison to "Theory X", "Theory Y" adds more of a democratic and free feel in the
work force allowing the employee to design, construct, and publish their works in a
timely manner in co-ordinance to their work load and projects. A study was done to
analyze different management styles over professors at a Turkish University. This study
found that the highly supervised Theory X management affected the research
performance of the academics negatively. In general, the study suggests that the
professional setting and research based work that professors perform are best
managed with Theory Y styles.
While "Theory Y" may seem optimal, it does have some drawbacks. While there is a
more personal and individualistic feel, this does leave room for error in terms of
consistency and uniformity. The workplace lacks unvarying rules and practices, and this
can result in a inconsistent product which could potentially be detrimental to the quality
standards and strict guidelines of a given company.
THEORY X
attitude
direction
we must be forced or coerced to make the right effort (debemos ser fuerza o por
coaccin para hacer el esfuerzo correcto)
responsability
we would rather be directed than accept responsability, which we avoid (que ms bien
se dirigiran de aceptar responsabilidad , que evitamos)
motivation
we are motivated mainly by money and fears about their job security (
estamos motivados principalmente por el dinero y los temores sobre su seguridad
laboral)
creativiy
most of us have little creative - except when it comes to getting around rules (la
mayora de nosotros tenemos poco creativo - excepto cuando se trata de obtener en
torno a las reglas)
THEORY Y
attitude
we need to work and want to take an interest in it. under the right conditions, we can
enjoy it (necesitamos trabajar y quiere tomar un inters en ella . en las condiciones
adecuadas, podemos disfrutar de ella)
direction
we will direct ourselves towards a target that we accept (vamos a dirigirnos hacia un
objetivo que aceptamos)
responsability
we will seek and accept responsability, under the right conditions (vamos a buscar y
aceptar responsabilidad , bajo las condiciones adecuadas)
motivation
under the right conditions, we are motivated by the desire to realize our own potential
(bajo las condiciones adecuadas , estamos motivados por el deseo de realizar nuestro
propio potencial)
creativiy
we are highly creative creatures - but are rarely recognized as such or given the
opportunity to be (somos criaturas altamente creativas - pero rara vez se reconocen
como tales o dado la oportunidad de estar)