Classic Knitwear and Guardian: A Perfect Fit?: Case Analysis
Classic Knitwear and Guardian: A Perfect Fit?: Case Analysis
Classic Knitwear and Guardian: A Perfect Fit?: Case Analysis
DATE OF SUBMISSION-18.02.2017
SUBMITTED BY:-
The product offered gross margin 38~39% which would enhance the margins of
Classic Knitwear from 18% which was substantially lower compared to industry
standards.
This innovativeness of the product can be leveraged by the production efficiency
of the company to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage.
The company had a moderate cost advantage over other US producers due to
high-volume, low SKU production runs. The addition of the new product meant
addition of 16 SKUs. This new product might lead to some inefficiency in its
present system.
Presently, the retailers were provided with 50% margin on branded knitwear and 40%
margin on private-label knitwear. The new product would provide the trade a 45%
margin. Our opinion is that displays would occupy a large amount of retailers space
and also the retailer margin is on lesser side i.e. 45% Vs 50% offered by other
brands. This would not encourage the retailers to stock the product. But the provision
of trade promotion and advertising allowance might induce them to stock the product.
The company projected sales would be 10,000 displays within two years of product
launch, of which 50% would be in discount stores, 25% in general merchandise
stores, and 25% in sporting goods and apparel stores. We think that as the company
has no experience in selling to these retail channels, it has to spend considerable
resources to develop the channel.
The company would make the Guardian shirts available to its existing wholesale
clients for distribution to interested screen painter in a later period as it has currently
decided to brand the product as Guardian Apparel.
Response of the Consumers
They are launching the product in the sole brand name of Guardian Apparel, and
have decided not to include the name Classic Knitwear
The launch is scheduled in January 07, which might not be the perfect time to launch
this product as its sales are supposed to be seasonal, it would be better to launch at the
end of winter so that the sales pick up instantly
The market research is not extensive and should not be relied upon fully for making
important decisions
Initial distribution is planned through major sporting goods and apparel chains which
would support the establishment of the brand in the introductory phase. The 3 No. of
sales reps to focus on this sector might not be sufficient for the whole country.
4. License Agreement
This agreement forced Classic to meet series of steadily rising annual net sales target
over the first four years and target for 4th year must be met in each subsequent year. If
it failed to meet the requirements then the license would be cancelled and void.
There are loopholes in the branding of the product. Only Guardian logo is being used
on the product. It may create problems for Classic if there is any conflict between
companies over agreement in future.
With this agreement a short term benefit can be visualized as the determined
marketing investment has been reduced to $3 million from initial expectation of $8-
$10 million.
As the brand value of guardian will increase by its promotion they should also bear
some part of marketing expense.
5. Break Even Volume of the product
Assumptions
I. Fixed Cost = $3.0 M (Advertising) + $ 510000(Salary of 3 Sales people for 2 years =
85000*3*2) + $ 100,000(licensing cost).
II. Trade Promotion = 5% off-invoice.
III. Advertising allowance = 10% of the 20% of retailers.
6. Demand for the product
Demand Estimation
US Men Population (age 15 and above)
10,00,00,000
Target Market(18-35) population(Assume 60% of Total
Population) 6,00,00,000
Awareness among Target Audience in two years (25%) 15000000
Awareness in first Year (12.5%) 7500000
Awareness in Second Year (12.5%) 7500000
Consumers interested in the product as per survey (185/1000) in
first year 1387500
Consumers "definitely would buy" as per survey(38%) in first
year 527250
Consumers that would buy based on past experience(60%) in first
year 316350