Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
208 views25 pages

大幅石矢的溫度控制措施 藍田邨重建基礎地盤案例 八月一日分享會

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 25

Temperature Control (TC)

Measures for
Footings & Pile Caps

Project: Foundation For Redevelopment of Lam Tin Estate Phase 7 & 8


Client: Hong Kong Housing Authority

Main Contractor: China State Construction Engineering (HK) Ltd.

2006/10/6 1
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ()
2. Literature Review ()
3. Selection of TC Measures ()
4. Assessment of Peak Temperature and
Temperature Gradient ()
5. Instrumentation and Installation ()
6. Lesson Learnt from this Project ()
7. Cost Analysis ()

2006/10/6 2
1. Introduction ()

)includes

1.1 Massive Concrete (
1.1.1 1.5m Thick Footings (15m x 12m)
1.1.2 2.5m Thick Pilecaps (15m x 14m)

The Site

1.5m thick footing


2.5m thick pilecap
2006/10/6 3
1.2 HKHA Particular Specification Clause ( )

CON1.M1110.P(2)
1.2.1 Submit concrete mix details including heat of hydration
and specific heat characteristics of constituents

Concrete Mix Details (40D/20, 100slump)


(1) OPC = 312 kg/m3
(2) PFA = 168 kg/m3  Cement replacement reduces heat of hydration
(3) Aggregate - 20mm = 755 kg/m3 }

(Granite) 10mm = 310 kg/m3 }  Thermal expansion coefficient of aggregate


fine = 310 kg/m3 } Granite = 10 x 10-6/C < Gravel = 12 x 10-6/C
sand = 310 kg/m3 }

Aggregate Type Gravel Granite Limestone Lightweight


-6
Thermal Expansion Coefficient x 10 /C 12.0 10.0 8.0 7.0
-6
Tensile Strain Capacity x 10 70 80 90 110
Limiting Temperature Differential C 20 28 39 55
2006/10/6 4
1.2 HKHA Particular Specification Clause ( )

CON1.M1110.P(2)
1.2.1 Submit concrete mix details including heat of hydration
and specific heat characteristics of constituents

Concrete Mix Details (40D/20, 100slump)


(1) OPC = 312 kg/m3
(2) PFA = 168 kg/m3  Cement replacement reduces heat of hydration
(3) Aggregate - 20mm = 755 kg/m3 }

(Granite) 10mm = 310 kg/m3 }  Thermal expansion coefficient of aggregate


fine = 310 kg/m3 } Granite = 10 x 10-6/C < Gravel = 12 x 10-6/C
sand = 310 kg/m3 }

(4) Admixture = 2.4 liter/m3  Retarder delays hydration rate (not total heat generated)
(Daratard-17D)
(5) Water = 188 liter/m3  Max ice 60% by weight  reduces material temperature
(6) Water/Cement Ratio = 0.39
(7) Aggregate/Cement Ratio = 3.51  Aggregate stores under shelter  reduces material temperature

2006/10/6 5
1.2.2 Submit formwork type and insulation

Timber insulates better than steel formwork 20mm thick CELFILL NR Joint Filler
(19mm Plywood) (1m x 1m or 1m x 2m)
1.2.3 Curing Details Thermal Conductivity = 1.649 w/mK

Concure RB90 Curing Compound


(FOSROC)
Retain water within concrete for effective curing

2006/10/6 6
1.2.4 Calculations of forecast concrete temperature,
temperature gradients and resulting stresses.
=> Early Thermal Crack Control

1.5m Deep Footing 2.5m Deep Footing/Pilecap

2006/10/6 7
2. Literature Review ()
2.1 Crack Types ()
Shrinkage Aggregate
Physical
Drying Shrinkage

Corrosion of Rebar
Chemical
Alkali Aggregate Reaction
After Hardening

Freeze/Thaw Cycles
Thermal External Restraints
Early Thermal
Internal Restraints

Crack Types Accidental Overload


Structural
Creep

Plastic Shrinkage
Before Hardening Plastic
Plastic Settlement
Before reabsorbing all bleeding water
(~2 to 3 hour after concreting)
Reproduced from Concrete Society (1992). Non-Structural Cracks in Concrete. Concrete Society technical report No 22, pp.48.

2006/10/6 8
2.2 Development of Early Thermal Cracks ()
Cement Hydration

Heat Generation

Heat Retain > Heat Loss

Temp Rise/Temp Gradient

Yes No
Restraint
Present

Induced Tensile Stress > Free Movement


Tensile Strength of Concrete (Expand/Contract)

Cracking Occurs No Stress Induced


2006/10/6 => No Crack !! 9
2.3 Temperature Control (TC) Measures ()

(A) Control of Crack Widths by Reinforcements


(Additional Steel Bar)

(B) Control Placing Temperature of Concrete


by means of (a) Cooling pipes
(b) Liquid Nitrogen

(C) Control of Heat Dissipation within Concrete


(Quilt System)

2006/10/6 10
3. Selection of Temperature Control Measures ()
1 2 3 4
Temperature Additional Steel Cooling Pipes Liquid Quilt system
Control Bar Nitrogen *(Job Reference)
Methods

- No TC monitoring - Effective and direct TC - Effective and direct TC - Effective and indirect TC
Advantages:
- No further analysis - No further analysis - No TC monitoring - Inexpensive
- Little time implication - Little time implication - No further analysis - Flexible
- Little time implication - Quilt reusable

- Expensive (material and - TC monitoring required - Expensive (material cost) - Continuous TC monitoring
Disadvantages:
fabrication cost) - Expensive (material and - High technique and skill to required
- Ineffective method installation cost) control temperature at - Analysis and report
- Large working space for air concrete plant required
compressor - Substantial manpower to
- Backfilling cooling pipes install quilt material within
- Noisy Operation (24 hrs) specified period
- Time implication (~21 day)
- Affected by ambient temp
- Sensitive to workmanship

* (2004). .. .
* (1988). .().
2006/10/6 11
Option Time Cost Risk/Difficulty
Additional Steel Bar 3 2 4
Cooling Pipes 2 2 2
Liquid Nitrogen 5 1 1
Quilt System 1 5 4
1 Relative slowest Relative highest cost Relative highest risk/difficulty
2 Relative slow Relative high cost Relative high risk/difficulty
3 Moderate Moderate Moderate
4 Relative fast Relative low cost Relative low risk/difficulty
5 Relative fastest Relative lowest cost Relative lowest risk/difficulty

Time Time
5 5
Fast Fast
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
Low 0 Low 0
risk/difficulty Low cost risk/difficulty Low cost

Risk/Difficulty Cost Risk/Difficulty Cost


Additional Steel Bar (Method 1) Cooling Pipes (Method 2)

Time Time
5 5
Fast Fast
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
Low 0 Low 0
risk/difficulty Low cost risk/difficulty Low cost

Risk/Difficulty
2006/10/6 Cost Risk/Difficulty Cost 12
Liquid Nitrogen (Method 3) Quilt System (Method 4)
4. Assessment of Peak Temperature and
Temperature Gradient ()
(a) Design Certifying Consultant Wong & Cheng
Consulting Engineers Ltd
(b) Physical modeling [Temperature Rise Evaluation Test (TRET)]
to obtain parameters on site for numerical modeling
(Adiabatic parameters = perfectly insulated condition)

TRET formulates two TC criteria =>


(1) Max. temp < 80 C
2006/10/6
(2) Max temp gradient < 28 C 13
5. Instrumentation and Installation ()
5.1 Typical Thermocouple Locations ()

(a) Plan

2006/10/6 14
Block 4
5. Instrumentation and Installation ()
5.1 Typical Thermocouple Locations ()

(b) Section

2006/10/6 15
5. Instrumentation and Installation ()
5.2 Installation and General Procedures

Thermocouple Thermocouple
Wire mounting on Rebar

2006/10/6 16
5. Instrumentation and Installation ()
5.2 Installation and General Procedures

Spray Curing
Concreting
Compound

2006/10/6 17
5. Instrumentation and Installation ()
5.2 Installation and General Procedures

Place Gunny Sack Surround Footing by Quilt

2006/10/6 18
5. Instrumentation and Installation ()
5.2 Installation and General Procedures

View
Data

Download
Quilt System
Completed data

2006/10/6 19
5. Instrumentation and Installation ()
5.3 Monitoring Procedures

HOKLAS Laboratory: ETS-TestConsult Limited


()

Monitoring Frequency: Data logging every 30 minutes

Monitoring Period: Minimum 21 days after concreting


Or otherwise specified

2006/10/6 20
5.4 Typical Monitoring Result

Block 4 (Wing A + Wing B) Temperature Monitoring


110 Ambient Temperature
Thermocouple No. 14
Thermocouple No. 15
Thermocouple No. 16
~ 45 hour after concreting Thermocouple No. 17
Difference (15-14)
90 Allowable Peak Temperature (80 C) Difference (15-16)
Difference (16-17)

70
Temperature (C)

50

Allowable Temperature Difference (28 C)

30

10

-10
2006/6/8 19:00 2006/6/10 7:00 2006/6/11 19:00 2006/6/13 7:00 2006/6/14 19:00
Time

2006/10/6 21
6. Lesson Learnt from This Project ()
6.1 General Attention to TC

(a) Removal of formwork too early }AGGRAVATE


(b) Spray water on concrete surface} ==========> Thermal
immediately after } ==========> Crack
formwork removal } ==========> Formation

(c) Plastic shrinkage/settlement greatly reduced by good


workmanship of tamping & toweling

2006/10/6 22
6. Lesson Learnt from This Project ()
6.2 Particular Attention to TC (Quilt System)

(a) Complete quilt system within 4 ~ 5 hours after formwork removal


(critical period starts at 16 hours after concreting)
(b) Apply curing compound thoroughly on concrete surface before placing gunny
sack
(c) Release heat by (i) water spray or (ii) pry the quilt open
(d) Monitoring is crucial at first few days
(e) Remove stagnant water by pump at low level area (i.e. lift pit & cap edge)
(f) High ambient temperature (i.e. hot season) prolongs heat dissipation period
=> delays formwork removal date until 21 days after concreting
=> program provision
(g) More formworks and quilts available on site (several sets for concurrent TC)
(h) Heat loss at edge/toe (blinding layer) of footing/pilecap is high and difficult to
control

2006/10/6 23
7. Cost Analysis ()
(a) Total Quilt Area = 6,050 m2
Labour Cost (C1) = HK$ 27.78 /m2
(b) Total Quilt Material Cost = HK$ 119,112
or Quilt Material Cost (C2) = HK$ 19.69 /m2
(c) Installation & Monitoring = HK$ 20,000/Block
or Installation & Monitoring (C3) = HK$ 13.22 /m2
(d) Consultant Fee = HK$ 70,000 (Whole Project)
or Consultant Fee (C4) = HK$ 11.57 /m2
(e) Total Cost of Quilt System = HK$ 437,181
or Cost of Quilt System per m2
= C1 +C2 + C3 + C4 = HK$ 72.26 /m2
2006/10/6 24
End of Presentation

Thank You Very Much

2006/10/6 25

You might also like