Complaint Affidavit - Samuel Bisco
Complaint Affidavit - Samuel Bisco
Complaint Affidavit - Samuel Bisco
COMPLAINT-AFFIDAVIT
SO ORDERED.
SO ORDERED."
Page 1 of 4
3. During the prosecution's presentation of evidence, Prosecution
Witness SAMUEL BISCO Y DE LOS SANTOS, Filipino, married,
and a resident of Sitio Lubas, Sibaguan, Sagay, Camarines Sur,
knowingly and falsely testified against me committed in the
following manner:
Page 2 of 4
d. On October 17, 2014, during the cross-examination of Mr.
Bisco by my counsel, Atty. Leo Caayao, he admitted in open
court that he testified against me because he was promised
by Bong Quillope (private complainant in the twin cases of
Grave Threats against me) that if he and one other prosecution
witness Rolando Condat would testify against me they will
not be included in a criminal complaint for qualified theft.
TSN
CRIM. CASE NO. S-4582/4583 and S-4588
Page 2
x- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
CROSS EXAMINATION:
A :Yes, sir.
A :Yes, sir.
Q :And as one of the pickers you know for a fact your name was
included in the complaint made by Ulysses Bong Quillope in
the police authorities of Sagay, Camarines Sur?
A :Yes, sir.
A :Yes, sir.
Q :But when a case for qualified theft was filed against the
coconut pickers your name and that of Rolando Condat were
no longer included, is that correct?
A :Yes, sir.
Page 3 of 4
Q :You and Rolando Condat were no longer included
in the accusations because the two of you were
promised by Bong Vicente Ulysses Quillope, that if
the two of you will execute an affidavit against
Guillermo Mendoza and Stephen Mendoza you will
not be included in the complaint, is that correct?
STEPHEN C. MENDOZA
Affiant/Complainant
Govt issued ID: ___________
Valid Until:_______________
Page 4 of 4