Schutte IC Chapter4 Visitor Management
Schutte IC Chapter4 Visitor Management
Schutte IC Chapter4 Visitor Management
4. 1 INTRODUCTION
Chapter 4 will look at the development of geotourism, site and visitor management and how
the various approaches and tools for the management of geotourism can be applied. Without
attractions and destinations, there would be no need for other tourism services. A geotourism
destination should be able to compete by involving social, environmental, economical,
cultural, political and technological strengths. The steps to destination success described by
Ritchie and Crouch (2003) will be interrogated.
A new trend is the establishment of geoparks worldwide. They are being set up to conserve
and manage geoheritage and, this will be discussed, in addition to the European and Global
UNESCO Network of Geoparks. The conditions and aspects that are involved such as
geoconservation, geoheritage, economic development, geo-education and management will
be examined. The utilisation of geotourism products through, geological and mining
museums, theme parks, geo-events and geo-exhibitions will then be discussed. The role of
The South African Gold Panning Championships held annually at Pilgrims Rest will be
described as it is the only event of its kind in the country, so far. Exhibitions to explain
geology to the public have been introduced in Europe and their introduction will be
evaluated.
Because interpretation forms a vital part of geotourism in these places, this too will be
examined. Another aspect that will receive attention is the role of interpretation as a
communication tool directed at visitors for this can persuade people to become more
environmentally and socially conscientious. It can also regulate visitor behaviour as a key
strategy for managing environmental impacts.
The tourism product concept was given as "... an amalgam of many components, the
attractions of the destination, the facilities at the destination and the accessibility of it
(Middleton, 1979, as cited by Bennet, 1995:7). The tourism product is therefore an amalgam
of many components, or a package, which forms a composite product. The main components
127
of the tourism product are perceived by the prospective tourist as an experience available at a
price. This then leads to the addition of the image of the destination and the price to the
consumer, as basic components of the tourism product (Bennet, 1995:7). Indeed, attractions
are the most important components of the tourism system. They are the main motivators for
a tourist trip, and are the core of the tourism product. Without attractions, there would be no
need for other tourism services. In fact, it is doubtful if tourism as such would exist if it were
not for attractions (Swarbrooke, 1997:3).
Primary geosites could be regarded as attractions and, when they are grouped together to
form a geopark, they collectively can become a destination. This is, however a very
simplistic assumption.
Swarbrooke (1994:222, 224) says that the product can be natural or manufactured, and can be
a single attraction, a destination area, or even a whole country. Thus, the heritage tourism
product is not heterogeneous. Some heritage is consciously owned and managed to attract
tourists, while other heritage features are managed with the aim of reducing problems caused
by unwanted tourism. Different types of organisations with different objectives control the
heritage product. The profit motive is often the aim of private-owned attractions, while those
in the public sector tend to be managed with wider social objectives in mind, such as
128
education and provision leisure facilities for the community. Some of the heritage products
are very authentic, while others are less authentic.
Prentice and Light (1994:210-211) offer a classification of heritage attractions. With regard
to the evaluation of interpretation comparisons between attractions of similar types, the
researcher suggests that heritage attractions should be classified in South Africa as follows:
Natural history attractions, including nature reserves, nature trails, geomorphological
and geosites that include caves, gorges, cliffs and waterfalls
Science-based attractions, including geological museums
Stately and ancestral homes, including country houses, manor houses
Towns and townscape, principally historic townships (Pilgrim's Rest), groups and
buildings in an urban setting
Old mines, mine shafts, mining equipment
Socio-cultural attractions, including archaeological sites (Masorini, Thulamela)
Countryside and treasured landscapes, including National Parks and other countryside
amenity designations
Rural landscapes which may not be officially designated but are enjoyed by visitors
Regions, including pays, or other historic or geographical areas identified as
distinctive by their residents or visitors.
Dallen, Boyd and Boyd (2005:46-47, 59) are of the opinion that attractions are viewed as the
primary elements consisting of activity places and their leisure setting, while the secondary
elements focus on services aspects within a region.
129
was established as long ago as 1872 and tourists have been drawn to such places because of
the natural heritage they offer. National Parks and many protected spaces often represent the
heritage landscapes of certain regions. This is certainly the case in most of the USA, Canada
and New Zealand where most of the heritage features are from the natural environment. The
Parks in Canada are valued as part of the national landscape. With their spouting geysers,
towering plinths of granite, volcanic peaks, mountain ranges, valleys and lakes, wetlands,
tundra deserts, and isolated outback regions, the National Parks in many countries rank as
internationally renowned visitor attractions and often the most visited heritage attraction.
The grandeur of the naturalness of regions is an essential element in the heritage supply they
can offer. As such, this type of supply is attractive to other types of tourism (for example,
ecotourism) as Parks offer opportunities to observe, admire and learn about existing flora,
fauna and the natural process.
Dallen et al. (2003:19-60, 59 and 282) believe that Attractions should be developed in
association with the support services they require. Failure to do so may result in the supply
being underused, or for more popular attractions, an inability to cater for the needs of
visitors. Creating a new supply by adding extra dimensions to the supply from the heritage
setting itself is the case of the development of the gold and gold trails in New Zealand at
central Otago.
Although the discussion below is primarily about tourism, it can be successfully applied to
geotourism in South Africa.
Goeldner and Ritchie (2006:436-438) are of the opinion that good planning must be based on
a sound understanding of those factors that fundamentally determine the success of a tourism
destination. The framework is shown in Figure 4.1 which includes nine major components:
1. Supporting factors and resources.
2. The core resources and attractors.
3. Destination management.
4. Destination policy, planning and development.
5. Qualifying and amplifying determinants.
6, 7. Comparative versus competitive advantage.
8, 9. Global (macro) versus competitive (micro) environment.
Weaver (2006:133-149) believes that tourist destinations are extremely diverse and that they
each form spatial entities, having in common the characteristic of place that fundamentally
dictates the way that sustainable tourism is engaged. Therefore, the pursuit of sustainability
is critically influenced by factors such as cultural landscapes, scale boundaries, absolute and
relative location and the fact that all geodestinations are positioned and influenced by a
nested hierarchy of other destinations.
130
Figure 4.1: The Ritchie/Crouch model of destination competitiveness and sustainability
(Goeldner and Brent Ritchie, 2006:437)
Ritchie and Crouch (2003:2, 9-29) state that ... what makes a tourism destination truly
competitive is to increase tourism expenditure, to increasingly attract visitors while providing
them with satisfying, memorable experiences, and to do so in a profitable way, while
enhancing the well-being of destination residents and preserving the natural capital of the
destination for future generations. Therefore, a tourism destination should be able to
compete by involving social, environmental, economical, cultural, political and technological
strengths. The nature of competitiveness and sustainability is in constant evolution and
therefore destination managers must monitor the surrounding world so that they are
anticipating tomorrow rather than reacting to yesterday. A destination must try to achieve
when it proclaims its goal of enhancing its competitiveness. Destination competitiveness
must be viewed from a long-term perspective. Competitive advantages relate to a
destinations ability to use its resources effectively over the long term.
Further, Ritchie and Crouch (2003:30) emphasise that the competitiveness of a destination
derives from a combination of both its resources and assets (naturally occurring or created),
which can be deployed to assemble the tourism product, and from the ability of the destination
to mobilize these resources. Part of this ability to mobilise resources (that is, its competitive
advantage) arises from the degree to which the destination has been able to chart a coherent,
widely supported course.
They (Ritchie and Crouch, 2003:29, 49) go on to express the opinion that every destination
must examine its ability to maintain all dimensions of sustainability (environmental, social,
131
cultural and political) if it is to develop and preserve true competitiveness. Destination
competitiveness and performance are linked by several steps, which are illustrated in Figure
4.2. Therefore, geodestination competitiveness should combine both comparative and
competitive advantages. The target marketing strategy should find congruence between the
competitiveness profile of the geodestination and 1) alternative market segments, 2) the
competition (allies and enemies) and their own strategies, and 3) the goals that the destination
aspires to achieve. The implementation of the strategy results in an outcome that must be
judged by comparing it with its own goals. The geodestination success is the shared
responsibility of everyone.
Ritchie and Crouch (2003:30) believe that the act of planning provides no guarantee that a
destination will succeed, but it does improve the chances of success. A tourism development
plan can, potentially:
Identify the best courses of action - a formal planning process requires a more
comprehensive and systematic assessment of a destinations strengths and
weaknesses, tourism opportunities and threats, and viable alternatives
Maximise community and industry support - planning, if undertaken appropriately,
provides an opportunity for all stakeholders to air any concerns and influence the
destination's course
Mobilise effort towards a shared goal - a plan acts as a communication tool to ensure
that those involved in its implementation have a clear sense of purpose and direction,
and an understanding of their role in the process
Ensure the efficient use of resources - as resources are finite, their allocation among
alternative, competing uses will result in different outcomes. Planning ensures that
the resource allocation is made explicit.
The steps to destination success (Ritchie and Crouch, 2003:29) are shown in Figure 4.2.
132
Figure 4.2: Steps to destination success (Ritchie and Crouch, 2003:29)
Eagles, McCool, Haynes and Christopher (2002:26) state that when capturing economic
benefits, the following are necessary:
Increasing the number of visitors
Increasing the length of stay
Attracting the richer market niches
Increasing purchases per visitors
Providing lodgings
Providing guides or other services
Hosting events
Purchasing local food and drink.
Eagles et al. (2002:114) shows the economic value of a protected area as being ideally suited
for geotourism as shown in Figure 4.3.
Ryan (2005:202-215) mentions that site managers are faced with operational considerations
when seeking to protect both natural environments and create satisfactory visitors
experiences. Site management of natural places involves several considerations:
The nature of the terrain and the maintenance of physical infrastructure
The needs of visitors
The needs of environmental conservation and restoration
133
The sustainability of the operational viability of the conservation agency.
Figure 4.3: Total economic value of a protected area (Eagles et al, 2002:114 as adapted from
Wells, 1997 and IUCN, 1998)
This leads to the enhancement of service provisions by introducing new interpretive services
that will allow for more time in meeting visitor demand by building visitor centres, conducted
talks and tours. Operational techniques by which geosite management can enhance visitor
experience while protecting natural environments are:
Marketing materials
Footpaths and trials
Signposting
Zoning.
Marketing materials such as brochures, maps and booklets are important in shaping visitors
expectations. The destination can be presented in glossy brochures with photographic and
pictorial illustrations, and interpretations of data in terms of visitor experiences. Therefore,
promotional material in bringing messages to the notice of the public is not simply an
advertising medium, but rather forms part of the product itself. An industry can create
expectations concerning experience where the main product is the experience of the place.
Promotional materials then become tools that geosite managers can use to promote messages
that are pertinent to the objectives of the site plans.
134
They can fulfil the role of gatekeeper to the attributes of the place.
Visual and audio presentations, museums, other exhibits, shops, souvenirs and refreshments
are all used to retain visitors in the area. Footpaths and trails concentrate and direct the flow
of visitors, acting as conduits by which sites of interest are connected. Signposts may either
be simply directional or they may contain information. These too have a role to play in
enhancing visitor satisfaction. They also reaffirm or provide reassurance by confirming
directions, informing visitors of key geosites and providing data about these sites. In the UK,
signposts often give information about:
The length and average duration of a walk to a specific site
The nature of the terrain, what type of walking gear might be required
Some information about the geosite itself.
The design and placing of signposts should be examined and the strategic placement can
draw people to the sign and away from vulnerable areas. Zoning can be used to identify areas
that range from those with specific environmental fragilities, where human intrusion is
restricted solely to scientific work, to those used for popular recreational purposes.
Information provision, guidance, signposting and track design are matters for site protection
and appreciation. In some extreme cases, they may be aimed at the preservation of life itself.
Ritchie and Crouch (2003:30-31) state that, The development of a destination tourism
strategy should occur as a subcomponent of the community's overall social and economic
development planning process for two reasons: (i) it will be conducted more efficiently
because similar questions will need to be asked and answered in these broader contexts; and
(ii) overall goals will not be achieved unless sectoral plans are in harmony.
Kotler (1993:76, as cited by Ritchie and Crouch, 2003:31) suggests that the strategic
marketing planning process provides several advantages because
Places compete for resources as do businesses
Dynamic, global forces affect their industries
Places compete for tourists, conventions, educated residents, factories, corporate
headquarters and start-up firms
They must be excellent or superior in some special ways
They must be market-conscious and market-driven as the attributes they develop
today will affect their market position tomorrow
If they will choose the wrong industries they are in the same position as companies
that chose the wrong products.
Ritchie and Crouch (2003:49, 146-149) conclude that sustainable competitiveness is where a
firm may not be regarded as competitive unless it is able to sustain any advantages it
possesses over the long term; thus Competitiveness without sustainability is illusionary.
Thus, a tourism policy is needed for destinations at all levels and for all types of jurisdictions.
135
Sustainability and competiveness must be the primary goal of that policy. The primary
components are the philosophy for tourism, and a long-term vision for a destination. This
vision provides important guidance for the definition of specific objectives for a tourism
destination and for the identification of any constraints to be observed as tourism is
developed. These objectives, in turn, provide a basis for long-term development supply and
demand strategies for the region. Policy formulation is the process by which all components
of policy are defined.
136
Tourism policy should fulfil the following functions:
It defines the rules of the game - the terms under which tourism operators must
function
It sets out activities and behaviours that are acceptable
It provides a common direction and guidance for all tourism stakeholders and within a
destination
It facilitates consensus around the specific vision, strategies and objectives for a given
destination
It provides a framework for public and private discussions on the role of the tourism
sector and its contribution to the economy and to society in general
It allows tourism to interface more effectively with other sectors of the economy.
Tourism policy affects the extent to which the day-to-day operational activities are
successful, that is, marketing, event development, attraction operations and visitor reception
programs.
Ritchie and Crouch (2003:130-144) discuss supporting factors and resources that are critical
elements when enhancing destination appeal:
Infrastructure: a foundation for successful tourism
Accessibility: addresses the curse or blessing of a location
Facilitating resources: human knowledge and financial capital
Hospitality: resident attitude towards tourists and tourism
Enterprise: the generation of human energy
Political will: is tourism part of the political landscape?
Peters and Weiermaier (2000:22-29) discuss the basic management principles in the creation
of tourism attractions. In Central Europe, much emphasis is currently being placed on
making tourism attractions more attractive through innovative investments in technology,
human resources and new tourism events such as theme parks. Increasing the attractiveness
of tourist sites should be done through appropriate management of tourist attractions.
Perceived freedom and intrinsic motivation are strong elements that shape the choices of
contemporary consumers. Three core elements that are common to most successfully
managed tourist attractions, events and/or fantasy parks are:
Imagination
Attraction
Perfection.
The first step is to create new products, services and better experiences and these must be
translated into commercialised products. Psychological foundations of the service experience
and the selling of quality must be applied so that tourism managers can build a bridge
between tourists quality expectations and their perceptions of performance quality. The last
step is the perfection of service operations by good planning.
137
In Europe, the geologists and geographers realised that when geosites are properly protected
and managed, economic benefits could accrue. Previously isolated regions where many of
the geosites occur could be developed as tourism destinations and at the same time, they
could be used for educational purposes. Pforr and Megerle (2006:123-124) noted that the
creation of geoparks can be seen as instruments to coordinate the many stakeholders towards
the common purpose of sustainable regional development.
In conclusion, it can be said that a sustainable geotourism approach implies that the natural,
cultural and other recourses of tourism are conserved for continuous use in the future, while
still bringing benefits to society currently. This approach is very important because most
geotourism development that depends on attractions and activities relate to the natural
environment, and to a lesser extent, on the historic heritage and cultural patterns of the area.
When these georesources are destroyed or degraded then the geotourist areas cannot attract
tourists, and geotourism will not be successful. Most geotourists seek destinations that have a
high level of environmentally quality simply because they like visiting places that are
attractive, clean and neither polluted nor congested. One of the most important benefits of
geotourism is that, if it is properly developed and based on the concept of sustainability,
geotourism can greatly help to justify and pay for conservation of an areas natural and
cultural resources. Therefore, geotourism can be an important means of achieving
conservation in areas that otherwise would have a limited capability to accomplish
environmental protection and conservation objectives.
Geotourism development policies should be planned for long-term periods ranging from 10-
20 years. This strategic planning focuses more on identification of, and less on the resolution
of, immediate issues. It is more orientated towards rapidly changing future situations and
how to cope with these changes organisationally. Short-term management, tactical
management, is more action orientated and concerned with handling unexpected events.
According to the Geological Survey of Finland, the Earths geological potential involves not
only its mineral and energy resources, and land-use for construction, but also wildlife, and the
educational and recreational values. Environmental knowledge extends to whatever places
quality and content into peoples lives. Environmental education aims to change peoples
environmental attitudes and, more importantly, their behaviour. Successful education and
learning require:
Setting up educational approaches, methods and tools
Organised training for teachers, civil servants and pilot instructors
Planning education of local people
Producing educational material, and
Planning educational sites.
(http://www.en.gtk.fi/Services/expert/environmental/)
It appears that the more educated a person is, the more the person travels and then, the more
of an educational experience is demanded by them from their travels. So why do people
travel? People travel for pleasure and people travel for work. These are the two main
reasons... People travel to see the world, to discover parts of it that they have only read about
in book. Whatever the reason and whatever the framework, travelling is a form of
adventure. (http://www.travelaffiliation.co.uk/travel.html). Thus, geotravel is travelling to
see the natural wonders of the world and nature is not a resource but a value as such.
139
Production of educational and tuition materials (guide books, site information,
multimedia presentations, in-depth studies)
Staff training.
Thus, geoheritage, landforms and natural processes should be conserved, enhanced and
managed so that the best is safeguarded and made available as a scientific and educational
resource. The population should also be educated about the value of geoheritage
(http://www.en.gtk.fi/Services/expert/environmental/). Environmental education should
therefore be taught from primary school onwards.
Carlson and Edwards (2007) state that Xanterra is the USAs largest National Park
concessionaire, operating hotels, lodges, restaurants, retail, campgrounds and transportation
systems in more than 20 locations, including:
Grand Canyon - North and South Rims
Grand Canyon Railway
Rocky Mountain National Park
Yellowstone National Park
Bryce Canyon National Park
Zion National Park
Crater Lake National Park
Death Valley National Park
Petrified Forest National Park
Everglades National Park.
Carlson and Edwards (2007) believe that the most succinct reason for pursuing innovation in
all of Xanterras operations, through the Ecologix EMS, is captured in their mission
statement where it is stated that:
Business decisions should balance economic viability with ecological responsibility
Waste must be reduce and recycled, energy and water conserved, and both guests and
employees educated regarding environmental stewardship
The sustainability of natural systems increased as good business.
Carlson and Edwards (2007) are further of the opinion that there is a belief within the
organisation that sustaining natural systems through continuous innovation and improvement
140
is not only good for the environments in which they operate, but is also good business.
Employees are required to hold management to explain for all operational decisions that
relate to environmental performance. There is both a top-down mission and a bottom up
monitoring mechanism to ensure continuous improvement in environmental performance,
compliance with environmental regulations and responsiveness to environmental priorities.
Ecologix is described as a hybrid Environmental Management System (EMS) as it includes
aspects of compliance, sustainability and accountability. The structure of the EMS is
indicated in Figure 4.4.
Figure 4.4: Structure of Xanterras Ecologix EMS (Carlson and Edwards, 2007)
Carlson and Edwards (2007) conclude that Xanterra addresses significant environmental
aspects by developing environmental policies, setting objectives and measurable targets,
implementing actions that include activities such as inspecting a chemical storage area to
ensure zero spills and providing a framework for continuous improvement (for example, by
reducing energy use by 10 percent each year). A management structure exists that
incorporates these objectives and targets into its programs and procedures. These are
subsequently translated into work instructions to train employees in the EMS and to ensure
competence in carrying out these responsibilities. As monitoring takes place, everything is
documented so that progress towards goals is continually checked, and corrective action is
taken when necessary. There are procedures in place to monitor and measure activities and
for the handling of non-conformance. A periodic auditing and annual management review of
the efficacy of the whole system is also part of the system process.
In summary, the overall benefits of Ecologix flow not only to the environment but also to the
business performance of Xanterra. Increased environmental compliance, necessary
141
corrective action, measurement and monitoring of ecometrix, certification and external
auditing, all place the company in a position of leadership regarding environmental
performance. An innovative green procurement program has led to reduced costs, liabilities
and impact on the environment, and for Xanterra, has created a competitive advantage.
Cossette and Pomerleau (2005:11-12, 17, 26-27, 30, 51) relate how the Qubec government
proceeded with the creation of Parc national des Pingualuit, Nunaviks first, with a view to
protecting one of Qubecs exceptional and internationally acclaimed sites. The Pingualuit
Meteorite Crater lays claim to uniqueness as much for its sharp profile, as for its geological
youth and for the crystalline purity of the waters it cradles. Objectives of the Parks
creation are:
With this first park in the northern part of Qubec environment, the Qubec
government wishes to protect an exceptional geological phenomenon and a
representative sample of one of Qubecs largest natural regions. It also intends to
facilitate discovery of this environment. The intention is to involve the Inuit with the
protection, development, and management of Nunaviks parks
Education in the Parc national des Pingualuit constitutes the ultimate tool to enable
discovery of the territory while contributing to the achievement of the objectives of its
protection. Educational activities encourage the understanding of landscapes, natural
phenomena, and biological diversity, as well as history and culture of Inuit from this
region of Nunavik. The founding objectives are bound by the mission of conservation
and may not under any circumstances jeopardize the Parks natural and cultural
heritage
Recreation in a natural environment represents, in the same manner as education, a
way to open up to the environment. As with educational activities, the recreational
activities provided for in Qubec Parks should be, as a priority, instrumental in
achieving the mission of these territories which is to protect representative or
exceptional elements of the natural heritage
There is a strong will of the government to involve the Qubec population and, in
particular, strong regional forces, with the protection, management and development
of the Park so that a natural, fertile territory be handed on to future generations. This
objective found expression through the signature of an agreement on management of
the Parc national des Pingualuit with Inuit organisations.
In managing the Park, the subjects most frequently reported in this matter dealt with respect
towards Inuit culture, protection of Park resources, employment and training. The ultimate
goal of the current master plan is to assure conservation of the territory for future generations
and for its use to visitors. The Parks educational program will attract public attention to the
territorys intrinsic characteristics and to integrating traits of the Inuit culture therein.
Recreational activities of an extensive character can provide an intimate contact with this
remarkable environment, thus fostering resourcing and discovery of pure nature while
avoiding damage to the most vulnerable elements. Visitors will have a unique experience
142
here while discovering the Pingualuit crater, contemplating exceptional landscape, and
experiencing a way of life that is unfamiliar to them. An achievement such as this will
contribute to stimulation of tourist and economic activity in Nunavik, thus benefiting the
entire population.
The Australian Natural Heritage Charter for the Conservation of Places of Natural
Heritage Significance (http://www.ahc.gov.au/infores/publications/anhc/index.html) was
drawn up in 2002. This Charter aims to assist everyone with an interest in natural places to
establish their natural heritage values and manage them. A framework is presented for
making sound decisions for both managing and restoring natural heritage places, based on the
ecological processes that occur in natural systems. It also consists of a process that can be
used to support and implement local, state and territory, national and international policies,
agreements, strategies and plans. It does not, however, replace statutory obligations. In the
Charter (p.3) it is stated that A natural heritage place is one that we believe we should keep
for the future - because it is valuable to usIt may also be somewhere that we know is
important because of what it is and what it can tell us scientifically. This place could be a
desert mound spring, a fossil site, an ancient watercourse or a marine or bush habitat rich
with life. We want to keep it because by doing so we will be protecting a resource of
biological and/or geological information. This helps us and future generations to better
understand the nature of our physical world and how we might live within its meanOur
natural heritage places are those we would want to inherit if we were to be born one hundred
or one thousand years from nowBy keeping our natural environment healthy we are
investing in our own well-being, protecting the essence of Australias unique character and
securing an irreplaceable gift for the generations ahead.
The diagram shows the planning process needed to be taken to conserve the natural values of
places. In clarifying the concepts involved in each step, the reference numbers of the relevant
articles are noted in the boxes. The conservation principles of articles 27 (p.7, 13) are the
basis for all conservation planning and so must be considered in each step. The central theme
of this process is to develop both a conservation policy and a practical conservation plan.
The desired goals for conserving the natural significance of a place, in the short and long
143
terms, should clearly be stated. The following step would be to outline the management
strategies and process that should be used and who would be responsible for the approval of
the decisions and actions to be taken. This will form the basis of the conservation plan and
how it will be implemented to ensure the conservation goals are met. The last, and one of the
most important aspects, is that the results of the conservation plan must be monitored and
reviewed continuously (p.6). The model is a very good one and could be applied to
geoconservation in South Africa. The various steps in developing a conservation plan are
shown in Figure 4.5.
Gray (2004:175-178) believes that the conservation movement began in North America. In
1864, the Yosemite Valley was proclaimed as the first protected area in the USA. In 1872,
Yellowstone became the worlds first designated National Park. It covers nearly one million
144
hectares of public land that have been provided for preservation from injury or spoliation, of
all timber, mineral deposits, natural curiosities or wonders within the park, and for their
retention in their natural condition. By this action, the land was withdrawn from settlement,
occupancy or sale under the laws of the USA, and dedicated and set apart as a public park or
pleasuring ground. At the northern entrance arch at Yellowstone, the words from the
National Parks Act (1872) are inscribed: For the benefit and enjoyment of the people. The
protected area includes all the geothermal features that were known at that time. Indeed, the
main reason for the creation of the Park was the protection of these geological wonders.
Apart from the 200-250 active geysers, it is estimated that there are 10 000 individual
geothermal features in the park. These also make the Park one of the greatest concentrations
of geothermal activity on the planet. It also contains the impressive Yellowstone Falls, the
Canyon of the Yellowstone River and one of the worlds largest calderas. Because the area
was protected for its geology, the wildlife within the park was protected at the same time.
However, through the years the latter have became the focus for nature conservation efforts.
After the Parks declaration, Mackinac Island (1875), Sequoia, Yosemite and General Grant
(1890), Mount Rainier (1890) and Crater Lake (1902) followed. Canadas first National Park
at Banff was established in 1885. An interesting point is that many of the early National
Parks were established because of their scenic or geological values. But later, the
overwhelming emphasis was on wildlife conservation. Perhaps, geoconservation now needs
to be rediscovered?
There are specific guidelines for protected area management categories. Distinct categories
of protected areas are managed mainly under the classifications of:
I Strict protection (that is, Strict nature reserve/Wilderness area)
II Ecosystem conservation and recreation (that is, National Park)
III Conservation of natural features (that is, Natural monument)
IV Conservation through active management (that is, Habitat/Species
management Area)
V Landscape/seascape conservation and recreation (that is, Protected
landscape/seascape)
VI Sustainable use of natural ecosystems (that is, Managed resource protected
area).
(http://www.unep-wcmc.org/protected_areas/categories/eng/index.html). Eagles, et al.
(2002) believe that some kind of tourism is likely to occur as a management objective in each
category of protected areas, except category I (a strict nature reserve).
(http://www.uneptie.org/pc/tourism/library/sust_prot_areas.htm)
4.5 GEOPARKS
It has become common in the world to set up National Parks to efficiently protect important
and unique geological heritages that have been formed during the long history of the earth,
for example, the Hawaii Volcano National Park, the Grand Canyon National Park in the
United States, the Galapagos Islands National Park in Ecuador and the Glacial National Park
145
in Argentina. Human history and the history of the Early are, naturally, closely linked.
Geosites are a common heritage of mankind. To maintain them intact is a responsibility and
an obligation of countries and geologists all over the world. Just as human life is recognised
as being unique, the time has come to recognise the uniqueness of the Earth, and it is
imperative for people to foresee the future of the Earth based on learning about its past and its
present. Learning to protect global geosites is the very basis of this long-term process. It
becomes the best way to set up national geoparks to protect geoheritage
(www.hceis.com/product/index/geology%20and%20geophysics/
in%20national%20geoparks%20of%20china.htm).
Reynard, Berger, Felber, Heitzmann, Hipp, Hug, Imper, Jordan and Von Salis (2004:2)
believe that there is a necessity to define clearly what geoparks are, to coordinate their
development at a national level, and to define quality assessment procedures. A special
Working Group dealing with Geoparks in Switzerland is currently undertaking a project of
compiling such guidelines, for Switzerland in particular, but with universal relevance. The
guidelines consider that:
A Swiss geopark may be established in areas with rich and diversified geological and
geomorphological heritage
The geoparks area has to be clearly delimited and sufficiently large to allow the
economic development of a community
A Swiss geopark must have a clear structures and organisation
A geopark project must present a concept for sustainable tourist development based
on earth science heritage
The sustainable tourist development of a Swiss geopark will be based principally on
the creation of geotourist products and services
A Swiss geopark should improve the conservation of geotopes (geosites) within its
limits in collaboration with the cantonal administration
A Swiss geopark should develop the pedagogic means for diffusing knowledge about
geosciences
A Swiss geopark should develop a concept for public relations
A Swiss geopark is not a legal category for nature conservation; it may on the other
hand overlay protected areas
The promoters of a Swiss geopark are not authorised to protect their geological
heritage, for this protection is carried out by the cantonal and/or communal
administrations.
Evans (2006:5) noted that geoparks are a relatively new international initiative established
and endorsed by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
(UNESCO). This is a label of distinction that has become synonymous with environmental
146
protection, sustainable development and citizenship. A UNESCO geopark status is only
granted to regions acknowledged as having the most outstanding geological heritage and
pedigree. According to the UNESCO definition, A Geopark should integrate the promotion
of geological heritage of a region without adding any additional category of statutory
protection to important natural sites. It recognises as a central principle the relationship
between people and earth history as well as the ability of the site or region to serve a focus
for economic development, primarily through geotourism.
In essence, a geopark is a multi-faceted branding and marketing tool that aims to encourage
regeneration, sustainable growth and co-operation between wide-ranging networks of
partners. These networks include environmental and heritage agencies, scientific
establishments, heritage centres, local authorities, industry, schools and community groups.
The partner organisations are encouraged to work together to develop the use of exceptional
examples of geoheritage and to promote and improve access to these resources with
innovative, yet environmentally sympathetic, schemes. To many people, the term geopark
suggests a fenced, enclosed Jurassic Park-style visitor attraction, but this would be a most
incorrect assumption. Geoparks typically comprise a regional plexus of exceptional
geographically clustered examples of geology. It is a free attraction, and designated sites
within the geopark will be improved, interpreted and linked with the development of a
comprehensive, integrated educational strategy. Interpretation will aim to deliver wide-
ranging subject areas at several interest levels with the intention of providing something for
everyone (http://www.circa.gbif.net/Public/irc/gbif/pr/library?l=/published_articles/nhcwgn
_15_pdf/_EN_1.0_&a=d).
147
Figure 4.7: The director of the geopark at a staple of rocks symbolising geology,
Rserve Gologique de Haute-Province Geopark, France in 2006
In the IGU E NEWSLETTER (No 1, July 2005:12) it is mentioned that at the end of 2004,
the International Geographical Union (IGU) Executive Committee decided to launch a new
task force on geoparks, an initiative that would bring a geographical perspective to the
recently developed UNESCO program for the management and protection of natural and
cultural heritage. According to this particular UNESCO definition, a geopark is a
territory with well-defined limits that has a large enough surface area for it to serve local
economic development. It comprises a certain number of geological heritage sites (on any
scale) or a mosaic of geological entities of special scientific importance, rarity or beauty,
representative of an area and its geological history, events or processes. It may not solely be
of geological significance but also of ecological, archaeological, historical or cultural
value. Since 2000, geographers and geologists have met on several occasions to discuss the
pertinence of an interdisciplinary perspective on geoparks, linking geoconservation with
endogenous local development. The latter has been one of the topics seriously undertaken by
geographers during the last decades. The geographical perspective on geoparks includes
integrating landscape as its main concept; requires a holistic approach and trans-disciplinary
research to promote multicultural participatory bridges, and links local knowledge and
practice into the research-development agenda (http://www.homeofgeography.org/).
148
www.earthwords.fsnet.co.uk/geopark.htm) gives an updated list of World Geoparks in that,
as of 22 November 2008, there were 58 geoparks in the world; 33 in Europe, 21 in China, and
one each in Brazil, Iran, Malaysia and Australia.
Watson (2006:4-5) is of the opinion that the UNESCO Geopark is a relatively new
international designation that aims to promote the sustainable economic development of
disadvantaged areas through geotourism. This concept was originally developed in Europe in
2000 by four founding geoparks, but was expanded in 2004 to become a global UNESCO-
backed designation with distinct continental branches. The European Geopark Network now
focuses on regions of outstanding local or national importance that cannot be included in the
World Heritage List, and provides international recognition for locally or regionally
important sites. The sites are listed primarily for their earth science interest but many also
contain important cultural and wildlife sites. Geoparks must also have a definitive boundary
and must be large enough to provide potential for true territorial economic development.
A European Geopark is a territory that has a special and rich geological heritage, both from
the national and European perspectives, but which has also a sustainable territorial
development strategy, usually supported by a European funding programme to promote
development. The Geopark must have clearly defined boundaries and sufficient surface area
for true, territorial, economic development. The Geopark must comprise a certain number of
geological sites of particular importance, in terms of their scientific quality, rarity, aesthetic
appeal or educational value. A prerequisite is that there should be enough geosites in a
specific area to warrant the economic feasibility of a Geopark. The majority of sites present
within the territory of a Geopark must be part of the geoheritage, but their interest may also
be archaeological, ecological, historical or cultural. No destruction or sale of geological
objects from a Geopark may be tolerated. The Geopark must be managed by a clearly
defined structure able to enforce protection, enhancement and sustainable development
policies within its territory.
A Geopark has a vital role in the economic development of its area through enhancement of a
general image linked to the geological heritage and the development of geotourism. It has a
direct impact on the territory by influencing its inhabitants living conditions and
environment. The objective is to enable the inhabitants to re-appropriate the values of the
territory's heritage and actively participate in the territory's cultural revitalization as a whole.
It also develops, experiments with, and enhances methods for preserving the geoheritage.
Lastly, it must also play a vital role in educating the wider public about Earth Sciences in
general and support scientific research into the geology of the area. The Geopark also
supports education on the environment, training and development of scientific research in the
various disciplines of the Earth Sciences, enhancement of the natural environment and
sustainable development policies
(europeangeoparks.maestrazgo.org/presentation.htm,
www.sdt.shetland.org/Default.aspx?tabid=67).
149
Figure 4.8: The famous geosite consisting of ammonite fossils,
Rserve Gologique de Haute-Province Geopark, France
The Bergslag area in Sweden has rich ore deposits of copper, silver and, above all, iron,
which caused foundries, forges, rolling mills, workshops and steel industries to develop as the
basic industries of the area. As in many other parts of Europe, the mines were abandoned,
one by one, over the past 30 years. The ecomuseum point of departure that focuses on the
areas inhabitants and uses history as a tool for understanding and for influencing the present
and the future, paved the way for a culturally exciting and revolutionary process of
transformation in the area. The motive was to create an awareness of the regions importance
through its history and to give people a self-awareness and enhanced sense of regional
identity to arm them to meet the future and the changes that that future will inevitably bring
with it. Although it is called an ecomuseum, a mining geopark would be a better description.
The localities of the 33 European geoparks in November 2008 are shown in Figure 4.9 below.
The numbers are arranged to date of proclamation (2000-2008).
150
Figure 4.9: Locality map of the European Geoparks Network in May 2008
(http://www.fermanagh.gov.uk/pubuploads/egp-rollup2008-c.pdf)
Zouros (2004:165-171) described that the European Geoparks Network (EGN) was
developed under the auspices of UNESCO in 2000 by the founder members in France,
Germany, Spain and Greece. It was initially developed by geologists and the concept, and its
criteria were taken seriously enough by UNESCO to develop and disseminate the
International Network on Geoparks. A geopark must work within the EGN to further the
networks construction and cohesion. It must also work with local enterprises to promote and
support the creation of new by-products linked with the geoheritage in a spirit of
complementarity with the other European Geoparks Network members. Bridging nature with
culture, management with protection, and geoconservation with local sustainable
development are the most outstanding characteristics of this new international effort.
Nevertheless, its main feature is the active local participation for the establishment and
administration of geoparks by linking education, participatory research, sustainable
development (that is, geotourism) with geoconservation as their main goals. Geoparks may
also bridge geosciences, ecology and the social sciences for protecting our worlds heritage.
The sites in a geopark must be linked in a network and must benefit from protection and
management measures. A European Geopark must work within the EGN to further the
networks construction and cohesion. It must work with local enterprises to promote and
support the creation of new by-products linked with the geological heritage in a spirit of
complementarity with the other EGN members. To obtain the European Geopark label, all
requests for the use of the name must be accompanied by a dossier (prepared on the model of
151
the Application dossier for nomination) as a European Geopark. This dossier must be
completed and submitted by the structure in charge of managing the territory where the
geopark is envisaged. The EGN Coordination Unit formed an Expert Committee made up of
specialists in sustainable development and the enhancement of the geoheritage and
representatives of international structures working in the area of enhancement of the
geoheritage. This Expert Committee gives advice for all decisions regarding the nomination
and integration of new parks within the network
(www.europeangeoparks.maestrazgo.org/presentation.htm).
Geopark status is not a statutory designation, but the parks must produce a comprehensive
management plan before being accepted into the network, and must also abide by a specific
code of conduct. For example, the sale of geological specimens, rocks, crystals or fossils, at
geopark sites is prohibited. This includes specimens taken from within the geopark, or from
other geological sites from around the world, and is in recognition of the need to conserve
geological heritage on a global scale. A breach of any of these specific rules could lead to the
revocation of geopark status. Consortiums of local authorities, communities and private
interest groups may propose new geoparks. They do not require sponsorship by national
governments. Geopark status must be renewed every three years and if renewal criteria
cannot be met, the site may be delisted
(www.europeangeoparks.maestrazgo.org/presentation.htm,
www.sdt.shetland.org/Default.aspx?tabid=67).
As an example, the Abberley and Malvern Hills Geopark (UK) has the following objectives
and actions intended to accomplish them:
Geopark objectives:
To conserve and enhance where appropriate, the geology, geomorphology and
landscape of the geopark
To promote the responsible collecting of specimens
To encourage visitors to the geopark at levels which it can sustain
To encourage safe use of the geopark by educational groups of all ages, and to
provide a high quality range of educational information and services about the
geopark
To continue the already well-established gathering and dissemination of scientific
information about the geopark
To ensure that the geopark and all its attributes will be used responsibly
To contribute where and when possible to the local economy and encourage
involvement of the local community in geopark activities
To ensure that the geopark plays a major role within the European Geopark Network
Key actions:
Continue to work with agencies and landowners on practical geoconservation
152
Target geotourists to visit out of season and away from overused locations
Work with operators to develop themed packages
Develop promotional links with Gateway Towns and interpretation centres
Continue to develop a sustainable product range and not to sell geological specimens
Continue to work with and inform councils and local community groups
Continue to liaise with District and County Councils, landowners and other geoparks
Enhance the robust information and communication strategy already in operation
Target schools and geological groups to visit the geopark
Continue to develop a quality geology and landscape trails program
Continue to develop all of the above actions within existing official plans, strategies
and guidelines.
(http://www.geocon.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/factfile.htm,
www.sdt.shetland.org/Default.aspx?tabid=67)
Dowling and Newsome (2006:253) noted that a more phenomenon was the establishment of
[world] geoparks by UNESCO to promote places that integrated significant examples of the
Earths geoheritage, in a strategy for regional economic development. This move led to the
establishment of an International Network of Geoparks. This movement could advance
geotourism around the world. Through the international respect for, and reach of, UNESCO,
geoparks have already made their mark on communities and regions. With greater awareness
by individual countries, the geopark movement could become the benchmark for geotourism
acceptance by governments, regions, communities and tourists.
Following the national and international initiatives, like the International Declaration of the
Rights of the Memories of the Earth (Digne, France 1991), the IGCP, IUGS, ProGEO,
Malvern Group, UNESCOs Division of Earth Sciences and the Council of Europe, an
international group of experts on Geoparks recommended the establishment of a Global
Network of National Geological Parks (Geoparks) seeking UNESCOs assistance in order to
promote the three goals of conserving a healthy environment, educating in Earth Sciences at
large, and fostering sustainable economical local development.
In February 2004, the UNESCO international group of experts assembled in Paris where the
following items were discussed and decided:
The establishment of a Global UNESCO Network of Geoparks.
The acceptance of the Operational Guidelines for application on the global Network.
(www.europeangeoparks.org/isite/page/52,1,0.asp?mu=4&cmu=30&thID=0).
Turner, Creaser and McKnight (2006:1-2) believe that geotourism is part of a worldwide
growth industry supported by people seeking a wider understanding of their environment.
The new Global Geopark Network is seeking the protection and promotion of geosites while
at the same time, fostering education, entertainment, fun, health and well-being for its
153
visitors. There is already an informal network of parties interested in forming geoparks in
Australia and the South Pacific. Important aspects of geoparks are the links between the
geology and the people, their stories; culture and history that can build into a sustainable
source of geotourism, bring jobs to rural and indigenous people and, in turn, help protect sites
of importance and promote geoheritage. A viable European Geoparks Network with 17
member countries is disseminating information on geological heritage by encouraging
education and tourism linked to UNESCO. Similarly, the Chinese Government, through the
Ministry of Land and Resources, has identified a network of 85 National Geoparks, twelve of
which have been accepted by UNESCO. Several sites and regions, such as the Western
Plains of Victoria and Mt Gambier region are actively pursuing the geoparks model as a way
to provide jobs and sustain development, as well as protecting their geoheritage. MacAdam
updated the above-mentioned data on 21 November 2008
(www.earthwords.fsnet.co.uk/geopark.htm).
Zhao Xun and Zhao Ting (2003:302-309) describe how, through conserving and developing
geosites, favourable social, economic and environmental benefits were brought about, and
created a positive climate for their inclusion in the World Geopark Network under the
patronage of UNESCO. The creation of geoparks became a new growth point for local
economies, and created a new field of employment. In return, geological popularization was
well implemented and geo-environmental protection began to win support among local
people. Active academic exchanges in this aspect have led to the establishment of many
thematic research centres, and scientific-technological connotation of tourism has increased.
By geoheritage protection, China developed a new field of co-operation with foreign
geoscientists.
Setting up geoparks in developing countries has proven to be a feasible way to protect the
geoheritage. In the new field of promotion of National Geoparks, geoscientists in China and
abroad now collaborate closely, aiming at a common goal of global sustainable development.
UNESCO has requested that geoparks should serve as a base for scientific popularisation. In
this connection, China launched all round improvement of tourism information, such as the
erection of sign posts, tourism route design, guide book compilation and tour guide training,
in addition to the provision of museums. Scientific popularization has been integrated with
tourism, and education with recreation. Geoparks in China became bases of scientific
popularization for the public (www.wdcgeo.net/geopark/images/Sino_econ.pdf).
There are several criteria laid down for the establishment of a geopark wishing to join the
Global Geoparks Network (GGN):
156
the applicants should seek co-operation with respective Geological Surveys, local
public and tourism bodies, local communities, universities and research bodies, and
private interest groups. The applicants will be urged to broaden the composition of
the start-up team in charge of the Geopark project. These groups should be
representative of the scientific, conservation and socio-economic communities of the
area. A wide local consultation process must involve the local population to facilitate
local acceptance of the planned Geopark, and so develop a strong concept for the
Geopark application dossier.
3. Economic development
Sustainable development was defined by the World Commission on Environment and
Development in Our Common Future (1987) as development, which meets the
needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own need.
One of the main strategic objectives of a Geopark will be to stimulate economic
activity and sustainable development. A Geopark seeking UNESCO's assistance must
serve to foster socio-economic development that is culturally and environmentally
sustainable. This will have a direct impact on the area involved by improving human
living conditions and the rural environment. It will strengthen identification of the
population with the area and trigger cultural renaissance, which in turn will aid direct
protection of geological heritage
Often, aspects of a regions cultural heritage will be linked to the geological heritage.
Respectful of the environment, the establishment of a Geopark should stimulate, for
example, the creation of innovative local enterprises, small business, cottage
industries, initiative high quality training courses and new jobs by generating new
sources of revenue (for example, geo-tourism, geo-products) while protecting the geo-
resources of the Geopark (for example, encouraging casting, instead of sale of
fossils). This will provide supplementary income for the local population and should
attract private capital. Geo-tourism is an economic, success-oriented and fast-
moving discipline, forming a new tourist business sector involving strong multi-
disciplinary cooperation.
4. Education
A Geopark should provide and organize support, tools and activities to communicate
geoscientific knowledge and environmental concepts to the public (for example,
through museums, interpretive and educational centres, trails, guided tours, popular
literature and maps, modern communication media). It should also allow and foster
scientific research and cooperation with universities, and between geoscientists and
the local populace
The success of Geopark educational activities depends not only on the content of
tourism programmes, competent staff and logistic support for the visitors, but also on
the personal contact with the local population, media representatives and decision-
157
makers. Therefore, the aspects of wide community participation and capacity
building on the local level (for example, training of visitor guides) will help to
develop a wide range of acceptance of the geopark philosophy (and also the transfer
of knowledge and information) in the population. It cannot be repeated often enough
that the involvement of the local people is of primary importance for the successful
establishment and maintenance of a Geopark
Among the instruments that should available for the transfer of information will be
events such as excursions for school classes and teachers, seminars, and scientific
lectures for the environmentally and culturally interested public and for those
residents who enjoy introducing their landscape to visitors. One of the main issues
must be to link geo-education with the local context, therefore, local students must
learn the importance of their geological heritage. Creating geo-curricula for primary
and secondary schools, using the local information about geology, geomorphology
and physical geography will all help to preserve the Geopark while at the same time
reinforcing local awareness, pride and self-identity. Geoparks can be great
educational tools at local and national levels
Within the educational concept, museums, discovery centres, interpretive centres
and other innovative new tools must be developed to promote the principle of
geological heritage conservation, and the necessity of its safeguarding and archiving.
The museums and centres should also serve by developing different educational
programmes for visitors and local actors
All educational activities should reflect the ethical considerations concerning holistic
environmental protection.
158
o Hydrology
o Mineralogy
o Palaeontology
o Petrology
o Sedimentology
o Soil science
o Speleology
o Stratigraphy
o Structural geology
o Volcanology.
A Geopark should explore and demonstrate methods and best practises of conserving these
examples of geological heritage
The management authority of the Geopark will ensure adequate protection measures,
in consultation with relevant statutory bodies, to guarantee effective conservation and
to provide means for physical maintenance, as appropriate. The sites will remain
under the sole jurisdiction of the country in which the Geopark is situated. It will be
the countrys responsibility to decide how to protect the particular sites or areas, in
conformity with their national legislation or regulations
A Geopark will respect local and national laws relating to the protection of geological
heritage. Its managing body should strongly discourage the selling of all elements of
ornamental geological heritage, which may not be regarded as sustainable but it may
permit, in certain circumstances, the limited (sustainable) collecting of geological
samples for scientific and educational purposes from naturally renewable sites. It can
be demonstrated that a sustainable approach in this question leads to higher economic
benefit than the short-sighted selling of Earth heritage, minerals and fossils.
159
usually through the development of sustainable tourism and other economic and
cultural activities, in developing the sustainable development component parallel to
its conservation efforts
Geoparks that are part of the Network will:
Preserve geological heritage for present and future generations
Educate and teach the broad public about issues in geological sciences and
their relation with environmental matters
Ensure sustainable socio-economic and cultural development
Foster multi-cultural bridges for heritage and conservation and the
maintenance of geological and cultural diversity, using participatory schemes
and co-partnership
Stimulate research when appropriate
Contribute actively to the life of the network through joint collaborative
initiatives (for example, communication, publications, exchange of
information, twinning, participation in meetings, common projects)
Contribute articles to the GGN Newsletters, books and other publications.
UNESCO supports the development of this initiative, among others, in order to
replace the geosciences on the agenda of politicians and decision-makers of the
governments and local actors, as well as on the radar screen of private enterprises.
An important number of activities within Geoparks are being developed worldwide to
increase partnership with the private sector, for example, the tourism industry. The
private sector often requests the international cooperative framework that UNESCO
can offer. UNESCO's umbrella will definitely raise the interest and awareness of
government sectors in this effort, as the Organisation has a strong attention-gaining
potential that will be used to its maximum extent informing its Ambassadors to the
different Member States. This, in itself, will lead to a much better understanding of
the reasons for, and support for local initiatives that want to join, the UNESCO
Network
The inclusion into the Global Network of National Geoparks would be a sign of
recognition of excellence in relation to the present guidelines and will in no way
imply any legal or financial responsibilities on the part of UNESCO. This relates also
to the use of UNESCOs name and logo, which will need special authorization with
respect to the regulatory framework of sponsorship of the Organisation. For approved
network members, a special logo was created for the Global Network. The use of this
logo and the mentioning of membership in the Global Network can be used only after
the successful evaluation of the application and upon receipt of approval from the
Global Geoparks Network Secretariat. The use of this common logo linked to the
identity of the Global Network Members is strongly recommended and is essential to
create a common image for all Geoparks throughout the world
Should a member of the network wish to use UNESCO's logo (temple logo) and
name for a specific event or activity, it must obtain patronage through the National
Commissions for UNESCO or receive special permission of the Director-General,
160
expressly authorized in advance, in writing. It is the responsibility of the managing
body of the Geopark to avoid any misunderstandings in this regard.
(http://www.unesco.org/science/earth/geoparks/2007guidelinesJanuary.pdf)
Figure 4.10: Poster explaining the geology, Gerolstein, Vulkan Eifel Geopark, Germany.
This Geopark is part of the Global UNESCO Network of Geoparks
MacAdam (2008) reckons that at November 2008, there were 58 Global Geoparks
(informally the terms UNESCO Geopark, World Geopark and Global Geopark are used
interchangeably) in 18 different countries. There were also 33 European Geoparks of which
the best known parks are Lesvos (Greece), Eifel and Schwbian Alb (Germany),
Sargansenland (Switzerland) and Haute Province (France). China had 21 World Geoparks
while there were only four Geoparks in the rest of the world: Araripe Geopark (Brazil),
Qeshm Island Geopark (Iran) Langkawi Geopark (Malaysia) and Kaniwinka Geopark
(Australia) (www.earthwords.fsnet.co.uk/geopark.htm, Updated 22 November 2008).
Geotourism products such as geosites, World Heritage Sites, caves, waterfalls, landscapes,
museum collections, defunct and present producing mines, historical mining towns and
geoparks can be utilised in various ways, for students, for the public, for visitors and tourists.
Pralong and Reynard (2003:51-55) describe the tourist value and the kind of exploitation of
geosites in tourist and recreational contexts. Certain specific target groups have different
social, cultural and psychological characteristics that could be satisfied by geotourism.
Depending on the demand, geotourism may be a form of tourism that is based on imagination
and emotion that favours experience and sensations. It may also explain the natural
environment by playing with its temporal and spatial dimensions and may provide
opportunities for economic development. Different target groups (seniors, families and
school groups) that may potentially be interested in cultural and natural landscapes seem to
161
constitute specific markets needing specific approaches. Therefore, on-site interpretation
should be more adapted to the visitors' expectations (geohistory, adequate level of
popularisation) and so a more original and striking way of communication has to be used.
From a promotional point of view, geomarketing, a kind of image communication that
explores the temporal and spatial dimensions of the rocks, could be developed. This will not
only generate inquisitiveness among the selected target groups but should be clearly
positioned to distinguish the product from similar destinations. Therefore, product
communication must complete this marketing strategy with the creation, promotion and sale
of specific and original products particularly during the European summer.
Many mining heritage sites were conserved and are now being used as tourist attractions.
Examples can be found in Sweden, Wales (Blaenafon), Germany, Italy, Austria, Australia
and Canada. The mining history of Rros (Norway), the historic centre of the town of
Diamantina (Brazil), and the mines of Rammelsberg and the historic town of Goslar
(Germany) were declared World Heritage Sites. The towns of Pilgrims Rest, Barberton,
Kimberley, Johannesburg (Gold Reef City) and OOkiep are examples of the mining heritage
of South Africa. The whole town of Pilgrims Rest has been declared a museum.
There are only a few mining museums, and these are mostly found in countries that have a
mineral/mining industry. Some well-known mining museums are:
British Columbia Museum of Mining, Vancouver, Canada
Mining Hall of Fame, Kalgoorlie, Western Australia
German Mining Museum, Bochum, Germany
German Slate Museum, Mayen, Germany
German Volcano Museum, Mendig, Germany
Roman Mining Museum Meurin, Kretz, Germany
Big Hole Mining Museum, Kimberley, South Africa.
In the National Volcano Park of the in East Eifel, Germany, there are many examples of
geosites that have geotourism values, for example, the German Slate Museum in Mayen. The
old slate mine under the Genoveva Castle is now a living museum where it can be seen and
experienced how slate, used for the roofs of houses, was mined and traded, and where the
local population was protected in the old mine workings during the last World War
(http://www.rathscheck.de/). The area are characterised by the many fire-belching volcanoes
that once covered everything with incandescent lava. Geosites where these phenomena can
be seen are the Laacher See at Mayen, the Roman Mining Museum in Kretz and the German
Mining Museum and Basalt cave at Mendig. They are all well conserved, well documented
and well promoted. Of special interest are the old mines where the Romans mined the
volcanic material for building purposes, water wheels and other uses. In the museums, there
are excellent displays of volcanism and the uses of volcanic material. Some of the material
162
mined was even shipped as far away as the Netherlands where they were used to construct the
dikes that protect that country from the North Atlantic
(http://www.vulkanpark.com/index.php).
Figure 4.11: Coal seam stope, Visitor Coal Mine, Deutsches Bergbau-Museum
(German Mining Museum), Bochum, Germany
The Mining Area of the Great Copper Mountain in Falun, Sweden, was inscribed as a World
Heritage Site in 2001. Copper production in this region, recorded since at least the 13th
century, is illustrated by the enormous mining excavation known as the Great Pit at the
town of Falun, planned in the 17th century. It has many fine historic buildings, together with
the industrial and domestic remains of a number of settlements spread over a wide area of the
Dalarna region, and now provides a vivid picture of what was for centuries one of the world's
most important mining areas. Copper mining at Falun was influenced by German
technology, but it became the major producer of copper in the 17th century and exercised a
profound influence on mining technology in all parts of the world for two centuries. The
entire Falun landscape is dominated by the remnants of copper mining and copper production
163
that began as early as the 9th century and only ended in the closing years of the 20th century.
The successive stages in the economic and social evolution of the copper industry in the
Falun region ranges from a form of cottage industry to full industrial production, and can
be seen in the abundant industrial, urban, and domestic remains characteristic of this industry
that still survive (http://whc.unesco.org/sites/1027.htm).
The British Museum of Mining (also called the Britannia Project), Vancouver, Canada,
embraced the concept of telling the stories of people who worked in the mine and lived in
the community that would be typical of the hardship and achievements of Canada's mining
pioneers. The aim of the Britannia Project is to celebrate the importance of natural resources
to Canadas history and future, and to demonstrate how innovation, leadership and
sustainability are providing a foundation for responsible mineral development around the
world. The museum is sited on a major highway between Vancouver and Whistler. More
than two million international and domestic visitors pass the Britannia site each year - visitors
who will see the transformation of Britannia from a stereotypical mine site to an
internationally recognised icon of renewal and sustainability. The rehabilitation of the Mill
has been undertaken, the support of the community and region is assured, and the
contribution of the museum's land to be used for this tourism experience has been agreed to.
The Museums management look forward to working with industry, government and the
public at large to make the Britannia Project successful. The site of Britannia with its
impressive mining infrastructure remains is an intriguing landmark, and makes testimony of
both Canadas pioneering history and to the challenges of pursuing a sustainable future.
Remediation of the site has taken place. A diverse array of stakeholders collaborates on the
new vision for this National Historic Site. It is anticipated that the Britannia experience will
engage visitors in the human and technological stories of the historic mining community and
may then contrast these with a modern-day story of reclamation and the regeneration of the
land in the innovative Earth garden facility (The Britannia Experience: Market assessment,
(http://britanniaproject.com/images/Phase_II_Market_FINALREPORT.pdf, and BC Museum
of Mining 2004-2005, http://www.bcmuseumofmining.org/pdfs/education2004-5.pdf).
The Blaenafon Industrial Landscape, Wales, has been declared a World Heritage Site. Big
Pit stands on the edge of Blaenafon, a town that had a vital part to play in the Industrial
Revolution. This revolution transformed the landscape, culture and society of Wales, the UK
and the world. Awarding World Heritage Status to the town and landscape marked the wider
impact of Blaenafons unique industrial heritage. The Big Pit National Mining Museum of
Wales is a real coalmine, and one of Britains leading mining museums. With facilities to
educate and entertain visitors of all ages, Big Pit is an exciting and informative facility. The
colliery buildings are open to the public and an exciting multi-media tour of the modern
coalmine is available to go 100m underground with a real miner to see what life was like for
the thousands of men who worked at the coal face. There are also museum exhibitions in the
Pithead Baths (Big Pit National Mining Museum of Wales,
(www.nmgw.ac.uk/geology/collections/2002/stone).
164
The Big Hole Mining Museum in Kimberley is the best example of mining heritage in the
South Africa. According to Roger Ketley, the De Beers project leader, the Big Hole
project was a cornerstone of the social investment program of De Beers in 2005/6. It aimed
to provide a world-class tourist facility in Kimberley and to support sustained employment
and business opportunities. It was designed to provide both an educational and a tourism
resource. The project is a joint venture between De Beers, the provincial government,
various municipalities, Northern Cape and Kimberley Tourism. It includes an historical
precinct that tells the story of early Kimberley, and which incorporates 13 new, small
businesses. It also includes a world-class visitor centre focusing on the story of the Big
Hole, De Beers and diamonds. The management of the project has been undertaken by a
multi-stakeholder Section 21 (not for profit) organisation. The R16.8 million Phase One
investment, announced by De Beers in November 2003, started with the construction of a
R2.3 million, 13-room guesthouse and a R3.8 million car park during the fourth quarter of
2004. This was approved in February 2005. The primary focus was the development of a
world-class visitors centre, called De Beers Diamond World, focusing on De Beers, the Big
Hole and Kimberley. Audiovisual effects simulate the underground experience while a
spectacular upgraded rough diamond display, a viewing platform and interactive audiovisual
displays enhance the visitors experience. A diamond and jewellery store, coffee and curio
shops complement a unique visit to Kimberley.
It is believed by De Beers that: Sustainability is the key to the success of the new tourist
attraction, and the company's commitment to this has already been a catalyst for further
investment in the area by others. There are plans for a conference centre, a 100 room hotel,
a winery and further tourism-related development, potentially adding up to R300 million in
further investment around the Big Hole.
(www.debeersgroup.com/..../Economics/Case+study+-
+Kimberley+Big+Hole+tourism+project.htm,
www.debeersgroup.com/.../Diamond+Journey/De+Beers+Global+Operations/Projects/Kimbe
rleys+Big+Hole+Project.htm, http://www.thebighole.co.za)
Weaver (2006:94-98) agrees that the mega-theme park is a potent symbol of globalization,
infantalisation, inauthenticity, alienation, stereotyping, technological utopianism,
hypersanitisation, escapism, decontextualisation, standardization, frivolous consumerism,
corporatism or some other aspect of post-modernist socio-cultural critique (Fjellman, 1992;
Sorkin, 1992; Rojek, 1993 and Bryman, 1995, as cited by Weaver, 2006:95). Theme parks
are usually established in exurban locations that seem to offer an ideal compromise between
access to large amounts of visitors and a proximity to urban markets. The effect of this
activity is, of course, to exacerbate urban sprawl.
165
Figure 4.12: Gletschergarten (Glacial Garden) museum, Luzern, Switzerland.
It is an example of a theme park
Gold Reef City is perhaps Africas greatest entertainment theme park, created around an
authentic 19th century gold mine. Mining themed-conferences, weddings and birthday
parties can be all be arranged. The heritage tour (Jozi story of gold) includes the introductory
movie Rich Beginnings - Our golden heritage, museum houses, a gold pour demonstration,
an underground mine tour, and all other attractions in the park. The museum houses are Mr.
Ohlthavers house (mine official), the Dowse house (home schooling) and the Oosthuizen
house (Afrikaner home). Gold Reef City also has a secondary attraction such as a casino
complex next to it. The following can all be experienced at the Gold Reef City theme park:
Jozis story of gold (heritage tour)
Specialty shops
Restaurants
A Victorian hotel
Conference facilities
Amusement attractions
Over 30 fun fair rides
Kiddies corner
Farmyard
Tribal dancing.
166
Figure 4.13: Map of Gold Reef City (www.goldreefcity.co.za in 2007)
Gold and the history of Johannesburg are intertwined. The discovery of gold in the late
1890's led to a gold rush by prospectors from all over the world to the area now known as
Johannesburg. In February 1886, a prospector named George Harrison, who had arrived in
South Africa from the Australian gold fields, was working as a builder on the Highveld farm,
Langlaagte. One Sunday morning while he was out walking, he tripped over an outcrop.
Fascinated by the quality of the rock he had stumbled upon, and realising that it was very old,
Harrison broke off a piece, took it back to the farm and crushed it. He later panned the rock
in a borrowed frying pan and noticed a gleam of gold. Harrison quickly reported his find,
applied for, and obtained, a free prospector's license - which he promptly sold to Frank
William Marsden for the grand sum of 10. This is the last history tells us of George
Harrison, and while very few people know of his existence, he is, in fact, the man who
sparked the evolution of Africa's biggest and most commercially active city Johannesburg
(http://www.goldreefcity.co.za).
On the 17th July 2007, it was announced that Rustenburg, in the North West Province, would
soon have its own multimillion-rand theme park, with mining and technology as core themes.
It will be built between the Olympia Park Stadium and the Rustenburg golf course.
Rustenburg is located on the western limb of the platinum-laden Bushveld Complex, which
contains most of the world's known platinum reserves. Modelled on some of the worlds
leading theme parks, Platinum City will be designed to highlight the past, present and future
of South African mining and will feature alongside other mining tourist destinations, such as
Gold Reef City, in Johannesburg, and the Big Hole, in Kimberley. As the name suggests,
167
Platinum City will be a theme park centred on platinum. One of the core attractions of
Platinum City for the tourists will be the simulated mine experience at the start of the visitor's
adventure. This would be a world first and bring the visitor to the coal face of an
underground operation in a controlled and safe manner. An interactive, stand-alone, mining
hall will trace mining through the ages, and will depict the impact it has had on the social
history of South Africa. It was announced that a visit was intended to be educational and
entertaining, with visuals, vibrations, dust, noise, playing on all the senses. The major
objective of this experience is not only to amuse, but also to educate the parks guests.
Therefore, Platinum City will become a metaphor for platinum, reflecting and
complimenting the diverse attributes of this metal dynamic, new, shiny, wearable and
playing a key role in new technology. [The aim is] to design and build a purpose designed
facility that will tell the story of mining, with the main focus being on platinum and its many
uses in both the luxury side of the business as well as its practical applications like the use of
platinum as a new energy and as catalytic converters in a new environmentally concerned
world (Platinum City, www.miningweekly.co.za/article.php?a_id=114713).
4.6.3 GEO-EVENTS
168
4. Climate change and geoparks. How can one influence peoples habits, by looking
at the distant past?
5. Quality management in geoparks. How to keep high standards in interpretation,
education and infrastructure
6. European Union and geoparks. How are geoparks linked to the activities of the
European Union, and how can the European Union (EU) support them?
7. Tourism and geoparks. How can tourism use the geosciences to achieve economic
benefit?
8. Presentation of new and aspiring geoparks. New and aspiring members of the
geopark community introduce themselves
9. Criterion to join the Geopark family. How do the different Geopark Networks
operate and how can a region apply for membership?
10. Bridging the gap between geology and soil sciences. What can these
interdependent topics do to improve the awareness of earth sciences?
The Inaugural Global Geotourism Conference 2008 was held in the Esplanade Hotel,
Fremantle, Western Australia, between 17-20 August, 2008. The United Nations proclaimed
2008 to be the International Year of Planet Earth. One of the central aims of the year is to
increase interest in the Earth Sciences in society at large. To help achieve this goal, the
Inaugural Global Geotourism Conference was a hallmark event which promised to set a
benchmark for the tourism industry in relation to the development, management, marketing
169
and promotion of landscapes. In discussing and engaging all aspects of geotourism, the
conference highlighted its status as a conservation tool, as an educational process and as a
nature-based tourism activity. An understanding of how form and process are linked is
important in geology and this can be delivered via geotourism. The unique conference
included case studies that displayed the issues involved in the management and care of such
attractions, and covered topics such as sustainability, impacts and environmental issues.
Figure 4.15: Gold panners, The 2008 Gold Panning Championships, Pilgrims Rest
Annually, the South African Gold Panning Association (SAGPA), in partnership with the
local governments Department of Culture, Sport and Recreation (DCSR), presents and hosts
the South African Gold Panning Championships at Pilgrims Rest South Africa. Every year
since 1997, South Africa has also been represented at the World Gold Panning
Championships that is held annually in a different member country of the World Gold
Panning Association. The 2005 World Gold Panning Championships, hosted by South Africa
170
at Pilgrims Rest, was widely acknowledged by the international gold panning fraternity to
have been a resounding success and a benchmark event. The number of participants at the
South African National championships has grown from just 78 in 1997 to 707 competitors in
2006.
Figure 4.15: Visible gold after panning at The 2008 Gold Panning Championships, Pilgrims
Rest
The 2007 South African National Gold Panning Championships was held between 20-24
September. The event was as colourful and exciting as could have been wished, and filled
with interesting activities and great competition prizes. The actual panning competition
started on Saturday 22 September and the finals and prize giving l took place on Monday 24
September, which was a South African public holiday. Although this was a championship
event, provision was also made for all who wished to participate, irrespective of age or
gender. No special physical attributes were required other than enthusiasm and passion. It
was an opportunity for each individual to experience one aspect of their heritage in an
exciting and tangible way.
The year 2007 started with a sudden rush when a group of Swedish gold panners challenged
South Africas best to a gold panning competition. This event took place at the gold panning
site at Pilgrims Rest on Sunday, 7 January. The Swedish tour company donated the first
prize of a full Kruger Rand and a second prize of a quarter Kruger Rand. The South African
Gold Panning Association provided the third prize, an eighth Kruger Rand. The competition
was intense with South Africa out-panning the Swedes. In June 2007, a group of three South
African gold panning enthusiasts decided to attend the Czech Republic National Gold
Panning Championships, and thereafter, the European Championships in Austria.
171
South Africans participated at the 2007 World Gold Panning Championships at Dawson City
in the Yukon, Canada, and this is where the championships took place from 20-26 August.
Over the past 10 years, the SAGPA and the DCSR have succeeded in making it possible for
more than 80 South Africans of all ages, genders and races to attend World Championships in
Europe, Australia and Japan. Although South Africa is the youngest member of the World
Gold Panning Associations 20 member countries, South African gold panning has, over the
last decade, become a prominent part of the international gold panning fraternity.
(http://www.sagoldpanning.co.za/index.htm, http://www.sagoldpanning.co.za/history.htm)
4.6.4 GEO-EXHIBITIONS
4.7 INTERPRETATION
In the document Communication and sustainable tourism at the E-Conference on the role
of development communication in sustainable tourism in 2006, interpretation was defined
as an educational activity which aims to reveal meanings and relationships through the use
of original objects, by firsthand experience, or by illustrative media, rather than simply to
communicate factual information (Tilden, Interpreting Our Heritage). Interpretation aims
to create in visitors meaning, so that they can put a place into personal perspective and
identify with it in a way that is more profound and enduring than random fact-learning can
alone produce. Interpretation is meaning making (Sam Ham, Meaning Making - The
Premise and Promise of Interpretation).
Every potential tourism destination has its own story and character, and to capture, interpret
and present that story is the essence of sustainable place-based tourism. It is this flavour
that defines a location. The gel that binds the tourism experience together ranges from
product branding to visitor opportunities, resources and services. As such, its elements and
many manifestations have real economic value. Interpretation can contribute to the quality of
life for local peoples. It can also provide an educational tool, can contribute to community
pride and sense of place and provide jobs such as tour guiding.
It is important to orient visitors to a destination before they arrive and once more when they
are on-site. Orientation includes practicalities such as directional, local transportation, safety,
event and business information (for example, restaurant location, hours, menu and price
range). It can also include basic background information that visitors should be aware of -
local customs, responsible environmental behaviour, basic history and geography, and the
best ways to learn more about the place.
Thoughts, experiences, research or case studies that were shared at the conference were:
How to involve the local population in building the image of their community and
communicating their nature, culture and values
How to support visitors in experiencing and understanding the place they are visiting;
Communication methodologies, activities and tools that can be shared, adopted, and
used to add value to the visitors experience
173
Methods for identifying and training local individuals most likely to succeed in
interpretive activities; and
How information provision to tourists can contribute to the respect and conservation
of traditional values in host communities.
(www.devcomm.org/worldbank/admin/uploads/WCCD%20Files/STConcept%20Note.doc,
(www.usaid.gov/our_work/agriculture/landmanagement/pubs/commun_sust_tourism.pdf:23-
24)
In the document: Defining nature tourism: meaning, value and boundaries. 2001.
Tourism New South Wales. Understanding nature-based tourism No. 2, other definitions
of interpretation are:
A special process of stimulating and encouraging an appreciation of the natural and
cultural heritage of a region, as well as a means of communicating nature
conservation ideals and practices (Queensland National Parks and Wildlife Service)
A special process of stimulating and encouraging an appreciation of the natural and
cultural heritage of a region, as well as a means of communicating nature
conservation ideals and practices (Queensland National Parks and Wildlife Service)
A means of communicating ideas and feelings which helps people enrich their
understanding and appreciation of their world, and their role within it
(Interpretation Australia Association)
An educational activity which aims to reveal meanings and relationships through the
use of original objects, first hand experience and illustrative media, rather than
simply by communicating factual information (Nature Based Tourism Strategy for
Western Australia).
The first definition sees interpretation from a visitors perspective as a means of adding value
to their experience because of the added interest created when more is known about an
attraction or experience. The second definition places the responsibility back with the visitor
to reach their own understanding based on their collective experiences
(http://corporate.tourism.nsw.gov.au/corporatelive/downloads/industry/2_defining_nature_to
urism.pdf).
174
has been written about the functions and importance for the success of tourist attractions and
products. [There are] ways in which effective interpretation can assist in the development of
more sustainable tourism.
According to Weaver (2006: 185), interpretation is a distinctive form of education that goes
beyond the simple conveyance of factual information through illustrative media. Ham (1992,
as cited by Weaver, 2006: 185) believes that:
Effective interpretation must be enjoyable and entertaining, bearing in mind that
tourists are non-captive recipients who can walk away from or otherwise tune out
messages that are not satisfying
It must be made personally relevant to the audience through the use of analogies and
metaphors and convictions and to issues and impacts that and by referring to their
values and convictions and to issues and impacts that directly affects the listener
Good organisation whereby a commentary is delivered around five or fewer issues.
and
The revelation of meanings and relationships requires that effective interpretation be
thematic, that is, based on overriding messages about selected topics.
Dallen, Boyd and Boyd (2003:174, 195-235) state that interpretation is an education-based
activity that reveals meanings behind historic sites, their people and their stories. It takes
several forms that include plays and exhibits, printed brochures and maps, signs, audio
presentations and guided tours. It has the ability to direct people away from sensitive areas
and educate them about the need to behave respectfully. Essentially a process of
communication or explaining to visitors the significance of the place they are visiting.
Personal interpretation is the most effective way of interaction because it also educates and
entertains visitors that cause them to reflect about environmental values.
According to Herbert (1989:191), the role of interpretation is to make people more aware of
what they visit, to provide knowledge which increases their understanding and to promote
interest which leads to greater understanding enjoyment and perhaps responsibility. Three
objectives are apparent:
To educate people about the places they are visiting
To provide an enjoyable, and even entertaining experience for visitors; and that
These two elements work together to increase visitors; respect for heritage and take
responsibility for caring for it.
Dallen et al. (2003:197) believe that education forms the basis of interpretation and that it
involves both a learner and a teacher, and can be undertaken by either formal or informal
means. If a visitor is more interested and knowledgeable, then better interpretive materials
should be presented so that more learning will take place. Pleasure and enjoyment should be
seen as dichotomous and as compatible with education and, through this approach, the visitor
experience will be enhanced. An important concept is to add humour when it is appropriate.
175
Having regard to geoconservation, the underlying value of the educative and entertaining
roles of interpretation is to:
Enhance awareness and increase knowledge of geosites and landforms
Create a sense of ownership
Instil a desire to interact with relics of the past in a sustainable manner
To have a special experience, and
To stimulate the intellect.
Tilden (1957, as cited by Ham and Weiler, 2002:36) believes that interpretation is an
educational activity aimed at revealing meanings and relationships to people about the places
they visit and the things they see and do there. Ham and Weiler (2002:36) believe that
interpretation lies at the heart and soul of what any good tour guide can and should be doing,
wherever the guide may be. Interpretive tour guiding is very important. It is not just about
face-to-face communication as guiding also includes non-personal or static interpretation
such as printed materials, signs, exhibits, self-guided walks and various electronic media.
Interpretation is used by tour operators, as well as by resorts, lodges, attractions, theme parks,
zoos, museums and visitor centres. Many of these use interpretive media to enhance the
visitors understanding, their appreciation of the environments being visited and the various
nature and cultural phenomena experienced. Thus, these too are informational pathways to
sustainable tourism.
According to Dallen, et al. (2003:206-207), Freeman Tilden was one of the pioneering
experts in interpretation and he proposed six principles that have guided much of
interpretative planning and the development of many interpretive programmes throughout the
world since the mid-twentieth century. His ideas became standard practice in the cultural and
natural fields of interpretation. The six principles are as follows:
1. Interpretation should relate to what is being displayed or described to something
within the personality and life experience of the visitor
2. Information itself is not interpretation because the latter is revelation based on
information. It is therefore critical to provide visitors with new information and
transmit it in a way that inspires
3. Interpretation is an art that brings together many other arts, whether the materials that
are being presented as historical, architectural or scientific
4. The primary objective of interpretation is not instruction but rather provocation
5. Interpretation should be more holistic rather than be made up of simple parts
6. Interpretation addressed to different visitor groups should follow a fundamentally
different approach.
176
4.7.2 PRINCIPLES FOR SUCCESSFUL INTERPRETATION
In the document: Defining nature tourism: meaning, value and boundaries. 2002.
Tourism New South Wales. Understanding nature-based tourism - No 2
(http://corporate.tourism.nsw.gov.au/corporatelive/downloads/industry/2_defining_nature_to
urism.pdf), successful interpretation typically reflects a number of key principles:
People learn better when they are actively involved in the learning process
People learn better when they are using as many senses as appropriate. It is generally
recognized that people retain approximately 10% of what they hear, 30% of what they
read, 50% of what they see and 90% of what they do
Insights that people discover for themselves are the most memorable as they stimulate
a sense of excitement and growth. Learning requires activity on the part of the learner
Being aware of the usefulness of the knowledge being acquired makes the learning
process more effective.
(Ecotourism: Impacts, potentials and possibilities, Wearing, S. and Neil J., 2000.)
Of the utilisation of a few selected geosites, MacFadyen (2005) says that quality interpretation
should be a key component of successful geotourism. At the Weekend workshop involving
people in geodiversity held at Wareham, Dorset, between 7-12 September 2004 it was stated
by MacFadyen that The way geodiversity is presented is crucial to the way it is perceived
and valued. Education and interpretation involve looking at how to raise this perception.
Together they represent more than simply giving information, but rather a spectrum of
activities that can be employed to communicate a message. High quality interpretation and
carefully targeted information to support education will encourage the understanding and
support of geodiversity by present and, more importantly, future generations. There are
numerous approaches to communicating geology and geodiversity to the public, including
talks, visitor centres, festivals and events, guided or self-guided trails, interpretation boards,
and a variety of publications, including magazines
(www.scottishgeology.com/outandabout/geotourism.html).
Hlad and MacFadyen (2004) give a very good account of geoheritage interpretation from the
Earth Heritage Interpretation and Tourism workshop, held at Crna na Korokem, Slovenia,
in October 2003. The aims of workshop were focused on learning how to help an
understanding and appreciation of the geological heritage through good interpretation, with
particular emphasis on geotourism. The workshop was seen as necessary as there was a lack
of appropriate training for geoconservationists and others working in the growing areas of
geoheritage interpretation and geotourism in Slovenia. Interpretation is an art, and requires a
systematic approach together with adequate training. The Scottish Natural Heritage already
had such knowledge and had gained experience in successful interpretation, particularly
regarding what interpretive principles worked and what constituted good interpretative
177
practice. The workshop also provided an insight into the methodology, planning,
management and importance of forging partnerships, and in the provision of interpretation
projects. The participants at the workshop were a very multidisciplinary structured group of:
Nature conservation authorities
Geologists
University staff
Museum curators
Interpreters and guides
Local community representatives.
Figures 4.17a and 17b: The geoguide explaining the formation of lava flows: 1) Munterley
hill (left), and 2) In an old volcano in the Volcano Eifel Geopark (right), Germany
Hlad and MacFadyen (2004) are of the opinion that communication has always played an
important role when governments were successful in implementing environmental policies.
Communication can help increase knowledge, raise awareness and change attitudes and
behaviour. Communication involves knowing the target group within which change is to be
stimulated and designing the best means and messages to bring about that change.
Interpretation is communication and is about telling a story that is a vital part of how people
experience the places they visit (http://www.snh.org.uk/wwo/Interpretation/default.html).
Good geo-interpretation will leave visitors feeling connected, inspired and alive with
curiosity. They will better understand the landscape, site or centre and will enjoy them more
and so are more likely to return. Interpretation is a way of imparting messages to visitors in a
memorable way. It is described by some as information with an explanation. Thus,
interpretation aims to improve visitors understanding and enjoyment through provoking their
interest, relating to their everyday experience and by revealing something new.
178
the activities of mankind that may damage it. Therefore, only those people and local
communities who know their geoheritage and can both identify and relate to it, can contribute to
its conservation and sustainable development. Geoheritage interpretation has a clear role to
establish the real links between the bio- and geodiversity and the need to conserve them both
equally. Another reason for the necessity of geo-interpretation is the opportunity geodiversity
offers in tourist efforts at local or national level. Good geo-interpretation will enhance the
visitors experiences and will help boost geotourism. European geoparks have already been
established across Europe and they represent examples of geotourism as an opportunity to
stimulate local economies. In these areas, geoconservation, sustainable development,
environmental education and sustainable tourism are being practised.
(www.sgu.se/hotell/progeo/news/1_2004/sloven.htm)
Figure 4.18: The mascot of the Eifel geopark, Willi Basalt, To explain volcanism to
children
Dowling and Newsome (2006, 12-15) provide an example of the vital role of interpretation at
an established geotourism destination, in this case, Wave Rock, Australia. Because there is no
movement, sound or interaction in rocks they must be brought alive to the visitor in a critical
aspect of geotourism for what is important about the rocks is how they were actually formed.
Therefore, trained interpreters are necessary to deliver the information and at the same time
inspire the geotourist. Thus, as in other forms of natural area tourism, the visitor needs to be
left with a sense of wonder and challenge as to where we sit as a species within the timescale of
planet Earth. The focus of interpretation should be at the geosite itself because the ultimate
objective is to increase understanding and enhance the enjoyment of the place. By instilling
interest via interpretation, appropriate visitor behaviour at the site can be achieved. The final
desirable outcome should be to encourage appropriate minimal-impact behaviour, increases
visitors awareness of impacts, foster conservation of the site and promote an interest in
geoconservation. Materials assisting in interpreting geosites could include art, books,
displays, slide shows and videos, interactive touch panels, models, specimens, computer
animations and activities. Although these are undoubtedly extremely useful, and in many cases
an essential part of presenting geotourism to the visitor, there is no substitute for a field visit. It
179
is therefore crucial to have on-site interpretation for face-to-face communication, but
remembering that selected materials can also be used in the field to enhance the interpretive
process.
In many cases, current on-site presentation is inadequate. Hose (2006: 223-238) believes that
there are three problems common to all involved in geo-interpretation:
The degree of detail required in various types of geological exposition
The capability of the audience to absorb what is being said?
What rules should be followed in order to communicate most effectively?
Although interpretation has been discussed in this chapter as part of visitor management, it is a
vital tool in the education of visitors when explaining geology and geoheritage in simple terms
to the layman (see Chapter 3, point 3.7).
Weaver (2006:185-187) believes that the overriding messages that are relevant to sustainable
tourism include the deliberate and unintended, direct and indirect, environmental and social
costs of Western lifestyles, the links between those lifestyles and resource exploitation, the
sustainability of indigenous lifestyles and the role that individuals can play in contributing to
environmental and cultural rehabilitation. He believes that the effective conveyance of these
messages can have transformational consequences that make people more environmentally
and socially conscientious and thereby help to achieve an enhancement orientated,
comprehensive model of sustainable tourism.
Tour guides are well positioned in mediating contact between the tourist and the attraction.
They can give effective interpretation but this is complicated by the multiple roles that must
be played by the guides and by the multiple masters that they must serve. The tour guide is
not only expected to provide appropriate interpretation, but is also expected to give group
leadership, to coordinate logistics, to ensure the safety of clients, to prevent inappropriate
behaviour, to deal with emergencies, to mediate interactions between clients and the host
community. These, in addition to fulfilling the expectations of clients, tour operators,
attraction managers and the host communities to whom they are accountable. Partially
because to this, tour guides may only be able to devote a small portion of time to the
development and presentation of persuasive interpretation that promotes positive behaviour in
the tourist. They can and do respond to questions, engage knowledgeably in dialogue with
the audience, utilising enthusiasm, bonding and personalization to increase the persuasive
power of their interpretation. Static interpretation such as signage, displays, brochures,
videos, webcams and audiotapes can also be used, particularly because they are more cost
effective. However, these cannot bond with visitors, nor personalise interactions nor yet
adjust to ever changing situational factors. Unfortunately, displays and signage are often
vandalised. Many visitors lack sufficient motivation, patience and, literally, the skills to read
extensive amounts of information available in brochures or on displays. Therefore, for most
180
attractions it is sensible to have available both effectively designed and interactive static
interpretation that complements professionally trained and highly motivated local tour guides.
Ham and Weiler (2002:37-42) are of the opinion that if interpretation is strategically
packaged and creatively delivered, it can contribute to sustainable wildlife tourism by:
Satisfying customer demand
Creating opportunities for local employment
Influencing onsite visitor behaviour
Promoting a conservation ethic that may extend well beyond their on-site experience.
Figure 4.19: Volcano exhibit that shows the interior of the Earth,
Vulkanhaus Strohn, Vulkan Eifel Geopark, Germany
Figure 4.20: Cross section of the Kimberley Mine, Big Hole, Kimberley
Interpretation also acts as an on-site regulator of visitor behaviour and is a key strategy for
managing environmental impacts. It has been employed for decades by the Canadian Parks
Service. The US National Park Service implements a more sophisticated interpretive
planning process aimed at informing decisions such as which audiences will be targeted with
which strategic messages (themes), with the specific purpose of influencing visitor
experiences and often behaviour. If how a person feels and act toward a thing needs to be
influenced, then it is necessary to influence what their beliefs are regarding that thing. This is
both strategic and purposeful because it is aimed at a desired outcome. Thematic
interpretation is the idea of communicating beliefs in an effort to strategically influence
182
attitudes and, ultimately, behaviours. The intent of thematic interpretation is to plant a seed
that will become the foundation of a new belief related to the desired behavioural outcome.
Lastly, interpretation promotes a conservation ethic in tourists. It can play a role in long-term
conservation by influencing what visitors come to believe about the area, about the resources
being protected and about the strategies being used to protect them. Through the sleeper
effect process, a day can be spent by observing or thinking about wildlife, and through this,
new beliefs can be implanted in a tourist's psyche. Reinforcement of the themes at a later
stage is necessary.
Figure 4.21: Information poster and map, at the entrance of the Tumulus Building Exhibition
Centre, Cradle of Humankind (COH)
In conclusion, Ham and Weiler (2002:41-42) believe that these are the premises and promises
of interpretation in wildlife tourism. They are also applicable to geotourism. If interpretation
is done well, it will enhance the geotourism experience of tourists, act as a mechanism for job
creation, serve as an on-site management tool and act as a strategic communication medium
for long-term conservation.
There are several areas in which geo-interpretation can assist to develop more sustainable
forms of tourism:
1. Visitor management can be used to direct visitors to less sensitive and less crowded
areas. It can also be used to develop previously under-utilised attractions and regions.
2. By using the existing attraction base and by attracting visitors to previously ignored
areas using interpretation, visitors can be persuaded to stay longer in an area. Thus,
economic benefits can accrue by external spending and more employment
opportunities.
3. Interpretation can highlight the importance of environmental conservation, and at the
same time, make visitors aware of the environmental benefits that can be achieved
183
4. Interpretation has a great potential to promote sustainability when the community is
allowed and encouraged to promote and support the aspects of their heritage that are
important to them.
5. Attitudes and values can change when interpretation increases interest and respect for
local communities.
6. Enhancing the quality of interpretation at visitor centres, attractions, on tours, along
trails/drives and in the field or on site, is a major opportunity area for nature in
tourism. As far as possible, interpretation needs to capture a visitors imagination,
intellect or emotions (albeit momentarily) and in so doing, engage their interest.
Differences of age and cultural background are also obvious considerations. When
pursuing excellence in interpretation, there are as many paths of possibility open to
visitor managers as there are creative ideas in the world. To fail to explore these is to
risk having an audience label the interpretive approach adopted as too dull, tired,
serious, patronizing, overcomplicated, overwhelming, superficial, or cautious.
Innovative and creative ideas resulting in exciting interpretation outcomes are often
achieved more successfully if more original and novel development processes are
applied, the creative net cast widely. Building wider creative alliances by involving
other people with different skill sets (for example, those who are known for their
innovative and wildcard thinking capacities as well as an essential sense of humour
and fun) can often prove of value - particularly if these people are properly rewarded
for the business significance of their personal contribution to the results. A capacity
for simple but effective delivery coupled with good commonsense and empathy also
helps.
4.8 CONCLUSION
The development of geotourism, site and visitor management and how the various
approaches and tools for the management of geotourism can be applied were examined. A
successful and competitive geotourism destination was discussed. Destination
competitiveness and performance are linked by several steps. Steps to destination success
were shown as consisting of comparative and competitive advantage, tourism markets,
competition, goals and a target market strategy.
184
Geoparks have been established in Europe, China, and now also in other parts of the world.
They are designated areas with a rich and diversified geoheritage. The geoheritage of those
areas should be conserved, enhanced and managed for future generations and for its use by
visitors. People in general must also be educated about the value of geoheritage. At present,
there are 58 geoparks in the world; 33 in Europe, 21 in China, and one each in Brazil, Iran,
Malaysia and Australia. Aspects in the creation of a geopark such as the economic
development of a community, clear management structures, a concept for sustainable tourist
development based on earth science heritage and conservation of geosites within its limits
were examined in some detail.
The development of the European Geopark Network under the auspices of UNESCO in 2000
with aims of conserving and enhancing the conservation value of geopark sites, creating
employment and the promotion of regional sustainable development through geotourism, the
provision of educational facilities and the encouragement of public enjoyment of geological
heritage was examined. Further, the Global Network of Geoparks aims of the establishment
of World Geoparks by UNESCO to promote places that integrate significant examples of the
Earths geoheritage in a strategy for regional economic development were then discussed.
The several criteria to be met for the establishment of a geopark wishing to join the Global
Geoparks Network were examined and interrogated.
Examples were given how geotourism products are being utilised in mining museums,
historical mining towns and theme parks. There are many mining heritage places that were
conserved and are now being used as tourist attractions. Examples in Sweden, Wales
(Blaenafon), Germany, Italy, Austria, Australia and Canada were offered. It was noted that
the mining history of Rros (Norway), the historic centre of the town of Diamantina (Brazil)
and the mines of Rammelsberg and the historic town of Goslar (Germany) were declared
World Heritage Sites. The towns of Pilgrims Rest, Barberton, Kimberley, Johannesburg
(Gold Reef City) and OOkiep were offered as examples of the mining heritage of South
Africa. Another example was the whole town of Pilgrims Rest that has been declared a
museum.
The role of The South African Gold Panning Championships, held annually at Pilgrims Rest,
was highlighted as it is the only event of its kind in the country - so far. Exhibitions to
explain geology to the public and to publicise its value were also evaluated.
The 3rd International UNESCO-Conference on Geoparks was an important event that was
held in Osnabrck, Germany, in 2008. The main topic was communication and the goal was
to create appropriate methods to raise the awareness of the geological heritage of the planet -
far beyond a geoparks borders. Before the conference posters, education pamphlets and
booklets from 58 World Geoparks were displayed at the 1st International Geoparks Fair.
The Inaugural Global Geotourism Conference 2008 was held in, Fremantle, Western
Australia, during August 2008. This hallmark event was seen as setting a benchmark for the
185
tourism industry in relation to the development, management, marketing and promotion of
landscapes. All aspects of geotourism were highlighted at this conference and geotourisms
status as a conservation tool, educational process and nature-based tourism activity. Case
studies which highlighted the issues involved in the management and care of such attractions,
and cover topics such as sustainability, impacts and environmental issues were included.
Exhibitions to promote geoheritage were placed as important mechanisms to introduce and
explain geology to the public and visitors.
186