International Sales v. THe Container Store - Complaint
International Sales v. THe Container Store - Complaint
International Sales v. THe Container Store - Complaint
Plaintiff,
and
Defendants.
complaint against defendants The Container Stores Group, Inc. (TCS) and Richards
NATURE OF ACTION
1. This is an action for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. 271, et seq. for
infringement of United States Design Patent Nos. D733,540 and D734,135 (collectively
the Patents-in-Suit, respectively the D540 Patent and the D135 Patent), both of
3. Subject matter jurisdiction is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. 1331 and
1338.
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 2 of 9
4. This Court has personal jurisdiction over TCS because at least a portion of the
infringements alleged herein occurred in the State of New York and in this District, and
because TCS regularly does business, engages in other persistent courses of conduct, or
derives revenue from goods and services provided to individuals in the State of New
the State of New York, including four retail stores located in this District
5. Venue is proper in this District with respect to TCS under 28 U.S.C. 1400(b)
because TCS has regular and established places of business in this District in the form of
four retails stores, and because TCS has committed acts of infringement in this District
through such retail stores and through its electronic commerce website.
6. This court has personal jurisdiction over Richards because Richards transacts
business in the State of New York and because it maintains its national sales office in the
1400(b) because Richards maintains a regular and established place of business in this
District in the form of its national sales office located at 230 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1700,
New York, NY 10001, and because, upon information and belief, it has committed acts of
infringement in this District at least by offering to sell and selling the Infringing Products
THE PARTIES
business at 576 North Birdneck Road, Suite 712, Virginia Beach, VA 23451.
2
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 3 of 9
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
11. Plaintiff is a seller of home goods, including particularly bed lifts having a design
12. On May 10, 2013 Plaintiff filed U.S. patent application Nos. 29/442,761 and
29,442,762 with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the PTO), seeking to obtain
13. On July 7, 2015 the PTO issued U.S. Design Patent No. D733,540 and on July 14,
14. The D540 and the D135 patents are subsisting and in force.
15. Plaintiff International Sales, Inc. is the owner of record of the 540 and the 135
patents.
16. Since approximately April 2016, International Sales has been systematically and
continuously marking the bed lifts and the boxes of the bed lifts it sells with the numbers
of the Patents-In-Suit.
making, using, offering for sale, selling, and/or importing infringing model number 1985-
4, The Container Store SKU # 10068860 (the Infringing Product), pictured below:
3
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 4 of 9
18. TCS offers to sell and sells the Infringing Products to retail customers through its
website.
19. The Infringing Products are manufactured abroad; Richards imports them into the
20. Upon information and belief, TCS began selling the Infringing Products in early
or mid 2016.
Sales Office and lists the phone number 212-889-0932 and the contact email address
22. The phone number and the email address correspond to Suite 1700 at 230 Fifth
4
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 5 of 9
23. The directory of the building housing Richards national sales office lists
Richards Homewares, Inc. for suite 1700, along with the contact information for Jamie
24. The door of suite 1700 of the building that houses Richards national sales office
displays the name Richards as well as the name beacon products inc., E. GAREY,
and N. Marzano.
25. Richards national sales office in this District displays maintains a stock of
26. When a potential customer visits Richards national sales office in this District, a
sales agent provides the full Richards catalog on a usb thumb drive.
27. When a potential customer visits Richards national sales office in this District, a
sales agent asks the customer to fill out a new customer form that is titled Richards
28. Upon information and belief, Richards national sales office located in this
29. Upon information and belief, Richards transacts a substantial amount of its
30. Upon information and belief, Beacon Products, Inc. is the exclusive sales agent
for Richards.
31. Upon information and belief, Richards exercises substantial control over the
5
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 6 of 9
32. Upon information and belief, Richards national sales office in this District has
Richards products.
33. Upon information and belief, sales and offers for sale of Infringing Product are
COUNT I
34. International Sales repeats and realleges each allegation contained in the prior
35. The D540 patent claims the design as shown in the drawings contained therein.
The Infringing Product is the same, or is substantially identical to, the design claimed in
36. An ordinary observer with an understanding of the relevant prior art of bed lifts
would be deceived into believing that the Infringing Product is the same as the patented
37. Defendants have infringed and continue to infringe the D540 Patent literally
and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, offering for sale, selling,
and/or importing the Infringing Products without the authority of International Sales.
38. Upon information and belief, Richards conduct and infringement of D540 Patent
39. As a result of its infringement of the D540 Patent, Defendants have damaged
Plaintiff.
6
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 7 of 9
shall be in no event less than a reasonably royalty, or, at plaintiffs election, Defendants
41. Defendants acts have caused, and unless enjoined will continue to cause,
irreparable injury and damages to Plaintiff for which there is no adequate remedy at law.
Unless enjoined by this Court, Defendants will continue to infringe the D540 patent.
COUNT II
42. International Sales repeats and realleges each allegation contained in the prior
43. The D135 patent claims the design as shown in the drawings contained therein.
The Infringing Product is the same, or is substantially identical to, the design claimed in
44. An ordinary observer with an understanding of the relevant prior art of bed lifts
would be deceived into believing that the Infringing Product is the same as the patented
45. Defendants have infringed and continue to infringe the D135 Patent literally
and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, offering for sale, selling,
and/or importing the Infringing Products without the authority of International Sales.
46. Upon information and belief, Richards conduct and infringement of D135 Patent
47. As a result of its infringement of the D135 Patent, Defendants have damaged
Plaintiff.
7
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 8 of 9
shall be in no event less than a reasonably royalty, or, at plaintiffs election, Defendants
49. Defendants acts have caused, and unless enjoined will continue to cause,
irreparable injury and damages to Plaintiff for which there is no adequate remedy at law.
Unless enjoined by this Court, Defendants will continue to infringe the D135 patent.
as follows:
employees, their successors and assigns, and all others in active concert or participation
offering for sale, selling, or important any product, including the Infringing Product
and/or any later or subsequent versions of the Infringing Product, that infringe the
Patents-in-Suit.
D. An award under 35 U.S.C. 289 of Defendants total profits for all sales of
8
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 9 of 9
royalty for Defendants acts of infringement, including treble damages based on any
Defendants total profits under 35 U.S.C 289, including all pre-judgment and post-
G. Such other, further, and different relief as the nature of this action may require
Respectfully submitted,
9
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1-1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 1 of 8
EXHIBIT 1
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1-1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1-1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1-1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1-1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1-1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1-1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1-1 Filed 07/28/17 Page 8 of 8
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1-2 Filed 07/28/17 Page 1 of 6
EXHIBIT 2
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1-2 Filed 07/28/17 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1-2 Filed 07/28/17 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1-2 Filed 07/28/17 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1-2 Filed 07/28/17 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:17-cv-05735 Document 1-2 Filed 07/28/17 Page 6 of 6