Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Cross Tabs

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

1

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=cuci kuku jamban BY cacing
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ CORR RISK
/CELLS=COUNT EXPECTED ROW
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs
Analisis Bivariat

a. cuci tangan pakai sabun * kecacingan


Crosstab
kecacingan
kontrol kasus Total
cuci tangan kurang Count 13 23 36
pakai sabun baik Expected Count 18.0 18.0 36.0
% within cuci tangan pakai sabun 36.1% 63.9% 100.0%
baik Count 21 11 32
Expected Count 16.0 16.0 32.0
% within cuci tangan pakai sabun 65.6% 34.4% 100.0%
Total Count 34 34 68
Expected Count 34.0 34.0 68.0
% within cuci tangan pakai sabun 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df (2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5.903a 1 .015
Continuity Correctionb 4.781 1 .029
Likelihood Ratio 5.993 1 .014
Fisher's Exact Test .028 .014
Linear-by-Linear
5.816 1 .016
Association
N of Valid Casesb 68
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
2

Symmetric Measures
Asymp. Std. Approx. Approx.
Value Errora Tb Sig.
Interval by Pearson's R
-.295 .116 -2.505 .015c
Interval
Ordinal by Spearman
-.295 .116 -2.505 .015c
Ordinal Correlation
N of Valid Cases 68
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for cuci tangan pakai
.2 96 .109 .803
sabun (kurang baik / baik)
For cohort kecacingan = kontrol .5 50 .333 .909
For cohort kecacingan = kasus 1.859 1.085 3.183
N of Valid Cases 68

Case Processing Summary


Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
cuci tangan pakai sabun
68 100.0% 0 .0% 68 100.0%
* kecacingan
kebersihan kuku *
68 100.0% 0 .0% 68 100.0%
kecacingan
penggunaan jamban
68 100.0% 0 .0% 68 100.0%
keluarga * kecacingan
3

b. kebersihan kuku * kecacingan


Crosstab
kecacingan
kontrol kasus Total
kebersihan kurang baik Count 16 27 43
kuku
Expected Count 21.5 21.5 43.0
% within kebersihan kuku 37.2% 62.8% 100.0%
baik Count 18 7 25
Expected Count 12.5 12.5 25.0
% within kebersihan kuku 72.0% 28.0% 100.0%
Total Count 34 34 68
Expected Count 34.0 34.0 68.0
% within kebersihan kuku 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df (2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 7.654a 1 .006
b
Continuity Correction 6.326 1 .012
Likelihood Ratio 7.855 1 .005
Fisher's Exact Test .011 .006
Linear-by-Linear
7.541 1 .006
Association
N of Valid Casesb 68
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures

Asymp. Std. Approx. Approx.


Value Errora Tb Sig.
Interval by Interval Pearson's R
-.335 .113 -2.893 .005c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman


Correlation -.335 .113 -2.893 .005c

N of Valid Cases 68
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
4

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for kebersihan kuku
.230 .079 .672
(kurang baik / baik)
For cohort kecacingan = kontrol
.517 .327 .818
For cohort kecacingan = kasus
2.243 1.148 4.380

N of Valid Cases 68

c. penggunaan jamban keluarga * kecacingan


Crosstab
kecacingan
kontrol kasus Total
penggunaan jamban kurang Count 15 27 42
keluarga baik
Expected Count 21.0 21.0 42.0
% within penggunaan
35.7% 64.3% 100.0%
jamban keluarga
baik Count 19 7 26
Expected Count 13.0 13.0 26.0
% within penggunaan
73.1% 26.9% 100.0%
jamban keluarga
Total Count 34 34 68
Expected Count 34.0 34.0 68.0
% within penggunaan
50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
jamban keluarga

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df (2-sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.967a 1 .003
b
Continuity Correction 7.535 1 .006
Likelihood Ratio 9.231 1 .002
Fisher's Exact Test .006 .003
Linear-by-Linear
8.835 1 .003
Association
N of Valid Casesb 68
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
5

Symmetric Measures
Asymp. Std. Approx. Approx.
Value Errora Tb Sig.
Interval by Pearson's R
-.363 .111 -3.166 .002c
Interval
Ordinal by Spearman
-.363 .111 -3.166 .002c
Ordinal Correlation
N of Valid Cases 68
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for penggunaan jamban
.205 .070 .598
keluarga (kurang baik / baik)
For cohort kecacingan = kontrol .489 .306 .780
For cohort kecacingan = kasus 2.388 1.219 4.676
N of Valid Cases 68

You might also like