Walking and Cycling Strategy
Walking and Cycling Strategy
Walking and Cycling Strategy
and Cycling
Strategy
for the Gisborne District 2004
Prepared by Gisborne District Council with the assistance and cooperation of NZ Land Transport Safety Authority, Transit
New Zealand, Gisborne Police, Tairawhiti Public Health Unit, Turanga Health, Sport Gisborne, Primary, Intermediate and
Secondary Schools, Accident Compensation Commission and Tourism Eastland.
Table of Contents
PART 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................ 1
1.2 PURPOSE OF THE STRATEGY ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.3 IMPLEMENTATION AND REVIEW ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.4 PUBLIC SURVEY RESULTS ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2
1.5 ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN BEHAVIOUR ............................................................................................................................................................... 2
1.6 GISBORNE ENVIRONMENT - ISSUES .......................................................................................................................................................................... 2
1.7 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3
2.0 VISION AND ACTIONS .................................................................................................................................................. 4
2.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
2.2 WHAT IS A WALKING AND CYCLING STRATEGY?..................................................................................................................................................... 4
2.3 WHY DO WE NEED A STRATEGY? ............................................................................................................................................................................. 4
2.4 COUNCILS ROLE ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
2.5 OTHER PARTICIPANTS .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 5
3.0 WALKING AND CYCLING NETWORKS.......................................................................................................................... 7
4.0 COMMUNITY OUTCOMES ............................................................................................................................................ 8
4.1 VISION OF THE WALKING AND CYCLING STRATEGY ................................................................................................................................................ 8
4.2 OBJECTIVES TO GUIDE THE STRATEGY ..................................................................................................................................................................... 8
5.0 ISSUES PREVENTING PARTICIPATION OR ENJOYMENT............................................................................................. 9
5.1 INFRASTRUCTURE AND SAFETY ................................................................................................................................................................................ 9
5.2 ISSUES IDENTIFIED INFRASTRUCTURE AND SAFETY .............................................................................................................................................10
5.3 EDUCATION AND PROMOTION ...............................................................................................................................................................................11
5.4 IDENTIFIED ISSUES - EDUCATION AND PROMOTION ..............................................................................................................................................11
6.0 PROPOSED ACTIONS .................................................................................................................................................. 12
6.1 INFRASTRUCTURE AND SAFETY ..............................................................................................................................................................................13
6.2 EDUCATION AND PROMOTION ...............................................................................................................................................................................18
6.3 MONITORING, REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION .....................................................................................................................................................20
8.0 TARGETS FOR ASSESSING EFFECTIVENESS OF THE STRATEGY .............................................................................. 26
PART TWO BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................ 28
9.0 CURRENT CONTEXT .................................................................................................................................................... 28
9.1 NATIONAL TRENDS.................................................................................................................................................................................................28
9.2 GISBORNE CITY CYCLING AND WALKING SURVEY 2004......................................................................................................................................28
9.3 ROAD SAFETY RECORD ..........................................................................................................................................................................................32
9.4 EXISTING FACILITIES ...............................................................................................................................................................................................33
10.0 ISSUES IDENTIFIED ..................................................................................................................................................... 36
10.1 INFRASTRUCTURE AND SAFETY....................................................................................................................................................................36
10.2 EDUCATION AND PROMOTION.....................................................................................................................................................................40
11.0 BENEFITS OF WALKING AND CYCLING ..................................................................................................................... 42
11.1 INDIVIDUAL BENEFITS .............................................................................................................................................................................................42
11.2 COMMUNITY BENEFITS...........................................................................................................................................................................................42
11.3 HEALTH BENEFITS ..................................................................................................................................................................................................42
11.4 ECONOMIC BENEFITS .............................................................................................................................................................................................43
11.5 ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS....................................................................................................................................................................................43
12.0 NEEDS OF WALKERS AND CYCLISTS ......................................................................................................................... 44
12.1 FUNDAMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL NEEDS .............................................................................................................................................................44
12.2 NON PARTICIPANTS................................................................................................................................................................................................44
12.3 PARTICIPANTS.........................................................................................................................................................................................................45
13.0 RELATING THE STRATEGY TO OTHER COUNCIL DOCUMENTS................................................................................ 46
13.1 STATUTORY DOCUMENTS ......................................................................................................................................................................................46
13.2 NON STATUTORY DOCUMENTS .............................................................................................................................................................................47
14.0 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................................................ 50
APPENDIX ONE ........................................................................................................................................................................ 51
THE PROCESS TO DEVELOP THE STRATEGY.......................................................................................................................... 51
1.1 Vision
This Strategy identifies a walking and cycling vision for the Gisborne District and provides a strategic
approach to further the realisation of the community vision, which is:
Gisborne District is a walking and cycling friendly region. Walking and
cycling are safe, convenient, enjoyable and popular forms of transport
and leisure that contribute to community health, well-being and tourism.
At a time when the benefits of walking and cycling are being increasingly recognised, there is
also a growing recognition that further action is likely to be required for these benefits to be
fully realised. This strategy provides a strategic direction to encourage and direct such
future action.
Important steps in Councils implementation of the Strategy will be the preparation of proposed ten-
year implementation programmes, to provide input into the Long Term Council Community Plan
(LTCCP), as well as 12-month action plans to provide input into Councils annual plan process. The
Strategys implementation will be reviewed on a three yearly basis to ensure that progress is being
made.
Just 3% of those surveyed considered the existing provision of cycling facilities to be very
satisfactory. The survey results indicate that the community consider there to be serious safety
issues associated with the existing cycling facilities.
Walkers were generally more satisfied with facilities although only 6% were very satisfied with the
current walking facilities.1
Most people walk or ride for fitness and the results infer that most participants are aware of the
health benefits. Safety was given as a significant reason for non-participation and as a significant
concern by those who presently walk or cycle.
Better public transport, safer routes, pleasant surroundings and small to medium distances are all
key environmental elements that make walking and cycling attractive. There is a need for education
and promotion so that people want to participate and understand the benefits of walking and
cycling. These benefits are not just around health outcomes. They also include a greater sense of
community, less traffic congestion, greater economic benefits and an increase in creativity,
particularly in children. The benefits are detailed further in Part II of the Strategy.
1
Gisborne District Cycling and Walking Survey as Digi Poll Ltd survey conducted by International Research Consultants Ltd, prepared for
Gisborne District council in July 2004. Page 8.
To help encourage walking and cycling for leisure, the Council should strive to provide high-quality
leisure routes, recognising the importance such facilities have on the health, well-being and
attractiveness of the community.
1.7 Conclusion
This Walking and Cycling Strategy seeks to support and encourage walking and cycling as part of
daily life activities. The aims is to help promote more active lifestyles and improved physical, mental
and emotional health, as well as encouraging increased community "connectedness" and to offset
the isolating effects of busy lifestyles, home entertainment and motor vehicle use.
2.1 Introduction
In 2002, the Government released the New Zealand Transport Strategy, the first national transport
strategy to seek to integrate all modes and users of transport. The Government also identified
funding for local communities to facilitate projects or actions designed to maximize the contribution
of walking and cycling to achieving the NZTS vision and objectives through initiatives designed to
increase participation in walking and cycling activities.
One of the requirements to access government funding, is that local communities need to have their
own vision and strategy for walking and cycling in their region. The parties involved in the
development of this document acknowledge the benefit of planning strategically for the future health
and well-being of our community through encouraging a safe, enjoyable and convenient environment
for participation in walking and cycling activities.
Walking and cycling are two of the best and easiest ways of being active. Each can be done in small
amounts each day. They are free or relatively inexpensive and can be incorporated into everyday life.
The good news is that New Zealanders already do lots of walking. In fact research from Sport and
Recreation NZ (SPARC) shows that walking is the number one recreation activity. Where New
Zealand can improve is by making it easier for people to walk.
However both walking and cycling are on the decline. Indications are that between 1990 and 1998
the number of cycling trips in New Zealand reduced 39%.2 The decline in both walking and cycling
as forms of household travel is most apparent among the young.
There are two key components that need to be considered to increase the uptake of walking and
other sustainable transport options like cycling. The first is the environment and the second is
human behaviour.
Better public transport, safe walkways and roads, pleasant surroundings and small distances are all
key environmental elements of making walking and cycling attractive. However, people need to want
to walk or cycle and understand the benefits of these activities. These benefits are not just around
health outcomes. They also include a greater sense of community, less traffic congestion, greater
economic benefits and an increase in creativity, particularly in children.
2
Getting there- on foot, by cycle, Ministry of Transport, February 2005
At a time when the benefits of walking and cycling are being increasingly recognised, there is also a
growing recognition that further action is likely to be required for these benefits to be fully realised.
This strategy provides a strategic direction to encourage and direct such future action.
Councils involvement in the development and implementation of this strategy is based on one of its
most fundamental roles: to promote the social, economic, environmental and cultural wellbeing of
the communities of their region. In performing this role, Council takes its direction from legal
statutes, adopted council documents, strategic documents and processes of consultation to
ascertain the needs and views of its communities.
The NZ Police
The Police are also involved in promoting general road safety. Police education officers run
programmes aimed at walking and cycling safety for school children.
Department of Conservation
A significant provider of recreational walking facilities and information on these facilities.
The following series of three maps illustrates the existing walking network and cycling network (that
is, existing recreational routes and high volume transport routes) in the Gisborne urban area and
coastal environs. Possible extensions to the network are shown on the maps with broken lines.
Walking and cycling networks for the remainder of the Gisborne District are yet to be confirmed.
2. The roading network, where it forms part of the walkway and / or cycleway network, shall:
a. be safe, accessible and desirable for pedestrians and cyclists as legitimate road users
b. prioritise provision of facilities and services for walking and cycling as modes of
transportation.
2. A community that is more knowledgeable about the economic, environmental and social
benefits of walking and cycling and less reliant on motor vehicles.
Just 3% of those surveyed in July 2004 considered the existing provision of cycling facilities to be
very satisfactory. The survey results suggest that the community consider there to be serious issues
associated with the existing cycling facilities. The responses indicate a need for significant
improvement. Thirty percent of those who ride bikes are dissatisfied with the current cycling
facilities.
With regard to walkers, the survey indicated that there was generally more satisfaction with facilities
although some opportunities for improvement were identified. Only 6% were very satisfied with the
current walking facilities.
Safety
The paramount need of walkers and cyclists is safety. One of the best tools available for safely
integrating cyclists into the transportation system is the identification and development of a cycle
network, especially where this enables provision of separate cycle lanes.
Only one third of random survey respondents considered Gisborne safe to cycle around. Significantly
more school-aged respondents considered Gisborne safe to cycle round. This may be due to a lack
of understanding of the dangers associated with cycling or that these respondents considered
themselves bullet proof. Conversely this may indicate that other respondents were overly cautious.
Specific concerns about safety related to a lack of cycle lanes, concerns with roundabouts, narrow
roads and traffic generally.
Two thirds of respondents considered Gisborne a safe place to walk around. Those who did not
consider it safe to walk around suggested footpaths needing repairs, concerns about lighting, dogs
and traffic as reasons for not feeling safe.
3
Gisborne District Cycling and Walking Survey as Digi Poll Ltd survey conducted by International Research Consultants Ltd, prepared for
Gisborne District Council in July 2004.
5.2.9 Lack of promotion and development of new and safer routes continues to discourage
participation in walking and cycling.
5.2.10 Lack of associated facilities for walkers and cyclists discourages participation.
5.2.11 Lack of mountain biking facilities prevents participation.
5.2.12 Behaviour of cyclists and pedestrians and motorists, creates additional hazards.
Respondents to the July 2004 survey indicated that in order to encourage cycling Council could
provide cycle lanes, improve road safety for cyclists, run promotions and provide more cycle racks for
parking bikes. Although a significant portion of respondents who were either under 35 years, Maori
or did not presently ride bikes, did not know what Council could do to encourage cycling.
With respect to walking, some respondents suggested promoting the health benefits of walking and
other sorts of promotions. Other respondents suggested better safer and more scenic footpaths or
tracks. Issues of overgrown verges and broken glass were also identified. Whilst a significant
portion of respondents who were either under 35 years, Maori or male, did not know what would
encourage walking.
Eighty percent of respondents undertake some form of exercise on a weekly basis and almost all
who did not participate mentioned some form of health problems or age as their reason for not
participating.4 This suggests that most respondents were aware of the health benefits of these
activities.
The survey also identified that participation in bike riding drops off during the 26 35 year age
group, reflecting the increased vehicle mobility of this age group.
4
Gisborne District Cycling and Walking Survey as Digi Poll Ltd survey conducted by International Research Consultants Ltd, prepared for
Gisborne District Council in July 2004.
Following is lists of projects identified to achieve the vision and objectives of the Strategy. Projects
are listed under three categories - Infrastructure and Safety, Monitoring, Education and Promotion
and Review and Implementation. The projects are also prioritised and given a target date.
The Strategy anticipates that a wide range of bodies will take responsibility for its implementation
including Council, central government agencies such as the Police and Transit, community groups,
businesses and individuals. Other agencies might also provide funding to undertake projects
supported by the strategy.
Important steps in Councils implementation of the strategy will be the preparation of proposed ten-
year implementation programmes to provide input into the Long Term Council Community Plan
(LTCCP), as well as 12-month action plans to provide input into the annual plans.
Confirm Networks
1. Confirm existing walking and cycling networks for the Gisborne urban and coastal Highest 2004/2005
environs. Identify possible extensions to these networks, taking into account: Priority
Additional areas for recreational walking for example might include: Gaddum's Hill
Reserve and adjacent QEII Trust Land; a coastal walkway network linking city,
Wainui, Makorori and beyond; an extension to the Makorori walkway; a walkway
utilising the existing rail corridors; Barkers Hill/Hospital Hill/City loop walkway.
2. For the remainder of the district including townships and rural locations identify High 2005/2006
a series of cycling and walking networks and possible extensions appropriate to
the topography and climate of the district, providing for a range of activities
including sport, recreation, tourism and transportation.
(This work provides the framework for further implementation actions to improve
the operation of the networks and to extend the networks. See items. 3-14
below for initial projects.)
Path beside major rural highway, State Highway Very High 2005-2006
1, north of Plimmerton, New Zealand.
(Photo: Tim Hughes). Source: Cycle Network and Route
Planning Guide, LTSA (2004)
b. Form a community group to liaise with GDC and other relevant public
agencies and to raise funds.
4. a. Research options to create a coastal walkway from the end of Kaiti Beach to Medium 2007-2008
Sponge Bay, around Tuaheni Point to Wainui.
Medium 2008-2015
b. Identify necessary works and develop a programme to fund and implement
necessary works.
5
See Gisborne Urban Coastal Strategy and the Open Space Strategy for Gisborne and Wainui.
6
See Open Space Strategy for the Gisborne City and Wainui.
7
See Open Space Strategy for the Gisborne City and Wainui.
8
See Open Space Strategy for the Gisborne City and Wainui and capital expenditure programmed in the Annual Plan 2002/2003, carried
through to subsequent years.
9
See Open Space Strategy for the Gisborne City and Wainui and capital expenditure proposed in the LTCCP.
15. Consult with representatives of disabled users to develop guidelines for the design Very High 2005-2006
and operation of networks and facilities
16. a. Prioritise safe walking and cycling access to schools. Consult with key groups Very High 2005-2006
to identify issues and options. (Safe routes might be identified as alternatives
to shortest routes).
17. a. Review intersections, particularly roundabouts, along major routes against best Very High Ongoing
practice design and operational guidelines for use by cyclists and pedestrians.
For example, connection points between beaches and city, Awapuni Road and
Customhouse Street.
18. a. Review current design and operation of shoulders for cycling and identify High 2005 - ongoing
locations along the cycle network where cycle routes should or could be
separated from motor vehicles. For example, the Back Ormond Road route to
Waihirere Domain could be widened to enable a cycle lane. This route has
relatively few side roads so is relatively safe except for heavy traffic and the
speed of traffic.
20. a. Review the design and operation of major pedestrian routes, e.g. major High 2005 -
routes into the CBD (giving attention to geometrics, planting, surveillance, Ongoing
fencing, lighting, signage and markings) to increase safety, amenity and
awareness of routes.
b. Identify necessary works and develop a programme to implement prioritized High 2007 -
improvements. Ongoing
21. Give priority to pedestrians over motor vehicles in key locations e.g. in the CBD. High 2007-2008
22. Provide frequent, safe, main road crossings in high activity pedestrian areas. Medium 2007-
Ongoing
23. Review GDC policies for the placing of footpaths where only one side of the street Medium 2007-2009
is paved. Identify options and develop a policy to deal with existing footpaths that
switch from one side of the street to the other, such as Stout Street.
24. Review provision and maintenance of footpaths and tracks on walking and cycle Medium 2009-
network routes, giving priority to areas where routes are unsafe such as the Ongoing
Haumanatua Stream Bridge, and/or in high traffic areas such as the footpath
down Grey Street from Alfred Cox Park to Waikanae Beach.
25. Ensure that re-sealing contracts require that the parts of the road used by cyclists High 2005 Ongoing
be adequately sealed.
26. Enhance and maintain a small number of high-quality leisure routes that will High 2005-
provide significant public value and be well utilised. Initial routes to be: Ongoing
27. Review adequacy and efficiency of regular roadside sweeping programme on High 2005-2006
roundabouts and all principal roads to remove glass etc. Ongoing
28. Encourage ownership of routes by community groups. Assist community groups Medium 2005 -
to adopt a programme of enhancement of specific routes. Ongoing
29. Review provision of ancillary features for walking and cycling such the regularity of Medium 2009 -Ongoing
rest stops for the disabled and elderly, pet care collection points, route
information (especially on high quality recreational routes), viewing opportunities,
artworks, and information about heritage or environmental features, lighting, and
bike racks.
30. Investigate and promote lock up facilities especially at colleges and polytechs, to Low 2007 -Ongoing
save students having to carry helmet gear from lecture to lecture all day, may
encourage participation from these age groups. Promote if desire is sufficient.
31. Engineering, road design and road maintenance processes to recognise and Very High Ongoing
provide for walking and cycling as essential considerations and requirements
within the transportation network.
32. Incorporate networks/routes as relevant into other Community/ Council Plans, High Ongoing
strategies and asset/activity management plans.
33. Link reserves planning and maintenance to this Strategy too, to ensure that High Ongoing
appropriate consideration is given to the needs of pedestrian and cycle users of
such facilities.
34. Review Councils statutory plans. Subdivision and development should allow for High 2005 -
and encourage safe and enjoyable walking and cycling. Investigate any Ongoing
amendments to the plans to assist implementation of this. For example,
investigate amendments to the District Plan to identify areas where reserve
contributions could assist with development of cycleways or walkways.
35. Review role of cars in the Inner Commercial Zone giving consideration to the Medium 2009-2010
benefits of making this area attractive for pedestrians and cyclists versus motor
vehicles and parking spaces as at present.
36. Investigate availability of GDC land and other land for the development of mountain High 2006-2008
biking facilities.
37. Facilitate discussions between mountain bikers and potential providers of land (for High 2005-Ongoing
example forestry companies and GDC) with respect to access to land and
development of facilities. Provide support to any community initiatives, for example
by providing information on regulations and by providing ancillary features such as
signage.
38. Review Reserve management Plan for Langford Fallon Reserve with particular Low 2009/2010
attention to the dual provision for walking and cycling, target user groups and the
types of facilities/tracks anticipated. Investigate methods to improve safety to
difference user groups, for example signage, separation of walking and cycling
routes.
39. Continue to improve and increase the mountain biking trails at Langford Fallon Medium Ongoing
Reserve.
40. Continue work of the Road Safety Coordinator. The Coordinator shall ensure that High Ongoing
safety issues for cyclists and walkers are given a priority and ensure the
implementation of appropriate District Wide education and promotion of cycling
and walking activities and associated issues.
41. Review and enhance other safety programmes especially with respect to childrens Medium Ongoing
safety, eg,
42. GDC will actively support and continue to invest in walking and cycling as part of High Ongoing
daily life activities, both as a significant employer and as a leader in the community.
43. Review existing education and promotion programmes especially with respect to Medium Ongoing
disabled people and other low-participation target groups.
44. Encourage opportunities for the community to have a go at biking e.g. bike library Medium 2009-2010
and hire a bike concepts, or programmes for school bikes at minimal cost. Liaise
with other organisations to find sponsorship funding.
45. Promote and encourage flexibility in work environments to enable staff to avoid Medium 2007 -
peak traffic times if cycling, running or walking as a mode of transport GDC to ongoing
lead by example.
Relationships
46. GDC to form a relationship with cycling/walking groups. A staff member would Medium 2005-2006
provide a point of contact to GDC.
Ongoing
Signage
47. a. Review signage of network routes and facilities, especially in the CBD and in Medium 2009 -
public open space areas. Consider where signs are needed: Ongoing
To describe the location of network routes and recreational opportunities. Medium 2009
Ongoing
To describe the degree of difficulty or skill needed for certain routes eg,
mountain bike trails in Langford Fallon Reserve.
48. Develop and promote information for specific walkways and cycleways throughout Medium 2010+
the district, to inform tourists and recreational users e.g. develop pamphlets /
booklets.
49. Include information about walking and cycling on GDCs web site promote the Medium 2006-2007
strategy; promote walking and cycling for health; promote and describe existing Ongoing
and future routes and facilities; include links to other relevant sites.
Events
50. Promote participation and awareness of opportunities by holding, facilitating and Medium Ongoing
promoting events eg,
Kidsafe Week.
51. Seek and provide sufficient funding to enable key actions to be implemented over Very High Ongoing
the life of the Strategy. Funding should be sought and provided by a range of
agencies, for example Pokies/Trusts.
52. GDC will prepare 10-year implementation programmes to provide input into the Very High Ongoing
Long Term Council Community Plan (LTCCP), through which funding is allocated to
implementation actions.
53. Every three years (in line with GDCs review of its rolling 10-year implementation Very High 2008 - 2012
programme to provide input into the LTCCP) GDC will monitor progress in
achieving the vision of the Strategy and review the document to ensure that it is in
line with current thinking.
54. GDC will also prepare 12-month action plans to provide input into the annual Very High Annually
plan process.
55. GDC, in consultation with appropriate groups, will refine existing and/or develop Medium 2008-2010
new programmes to achieve the Vision of the Strategy. For example, it is
anticipated that projects to investigate possible extensions to the networks will
continue to be added to the list of implementation actions.
The implementation actions in Section 6 of this Strategy are combined for convenience into the following table to form an indicative implementation plan to
2015. The shaded cells are the years in which a project will be undertaken subject to funding.
Project 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15
1.
2.
3. a)
b)
c)
Coastal Walkway
4. a)
b)
Okitu to Makorori
5. a)
b)
6. a)
b)
7.
8. a)
b)
9. a)
b)
Valley Road
10. a)
b)
11. a)
b)
12. a)
b)
13. a)
b)
14.
15.
16. a)
b)
17. a)
b)
18. a)
b)
19. a)
b)
20. a)
b)
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
Relationships
46.
Signage
47. a)
b)
48.
49.
Events
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
Every three years (in line with Councils review of its rolling 10-year implementation programme to
provide input into the LTCCP) Council will monitor progress in achieving the vision of the strategy and
review the document to ensure that it is in line with current thinking.
The success of the Strategy will (in part) be measured against six targets. Figures in 2000 are actual
figures; the remaining figures are projected targets.
1. Increased community and visitor use of the walking and cycling networks.
Goal for 2015 is to achieve a 5% increase in use.
Cyclists (TBA)
Measured by GDC public survey and visitor survey
2. Increased community and visitor satisfaction with safety of walking and cycling routes
and facilities.
Goal for 2015 is to achieve 75% satisfaction by walkers and 60% satisfaction by cyclists.
Pedestrians (TBA)
Cyclists (TBA)
Measured by GDC public survey and visitor survey
Walking
Cycling
Measured by school gate and bike shed survey and school rolls
Pedestrians (TBA)
Cyclists (TBA)
Data from Land Transport Safety Authority, Road Safety Reports
Total
Measured by Public Survey and School gate Survey
6. Increased consideration and provision made for cyclists within the roading infrastructure
design and maintenance programmes.
Goal for 2015 is to achieve proof of consideration 80% of the time and provision made
specifically for cyclists 60% of the time.
Consideration
Provision
Measured by audit of processes undertaken by GDC Roading Division
9.2.2 Participation
Respondents were asked how often they had ridden a bicycle in the last year. 30% of the
random sample rode a bike at least weekly (10% rode daily); while 45% said they had not
ridden a bike in the last year. For the school sample 69% rode a bike at least weekly (nearly
a third of the school children rode daily) and only two of 19 school respondents did not ride a
bike.
10
LTSA, Travel Survey Report 1997/1998 (LTSA, Wellington, June 2000) in Getting there on foot, by cycle: A draft strategy to increase walking and
cycling in New Zealand transport (October 2003)
The vast majority of respondents undertake some form of exercise on a regular basis. In
total, 80% of the respondents from the random sample either walk, bike or play sport on at
least a weekly basis. Only 6% of the sample did not undertake any of these activities in the
past year. Nearly all of these 12 respondents mentioned health problems or age as their
reason for not participating.
As would be expected there are clear trends of involvement with older respondents generally
being less active than the younger respondents. However, with bike riding it appears that
there is an anomaly in this trend with respondents aged 26-35 participating less than the
under 25s or those aged 36-50. This possibly reflects that as young adults become more
mobile then biking becomes less appealing until they have children or the economics of the
family motivate them to ride again.
There is also a significant difference in the proportions that ride a bike based on gender.
43% of men ride a bike at least weekly and only a third do not ride a bike, while 17% of
women ride a bike at least weekly and 57% do not ride a bike.
Those respondents who had walked more than a kilometre in the last year also gave a variety
of reasons for their participation. In the random sample, the most common reason was
again for health (73%), a quarter of the respondents said they walked for recreation and a
further quarter said their main reason was as a means of transport to school or work. The
school sample walkers were most likely to walk for fitness (37%) or as a means of transport
(37%).
The reasons for not participating were similar for walking, with interest, age and preferring
other means being common reasons. Safety was a much bigger issue for those who do not
walk than for those who do not cycle, but the numbers of non-walkers are too small to be
able to draw any reliable conclusions.
Walkers from the random sample are significantly more satisfied with the current walking
facilities (satisfaction index = 63.0) but this score also reflects some serious concerns. The
satisfaction profile of the school sample is different, with a much higher satisfaction index of
75.8. This difference probably reflects that school respondents have more modest
expectations and are less worried about safety.
The main suggestion from the random sample was to provide cycle lanes. 65% of the bike
riders in the sample and 53% of the total sample mentioned this, a quarter wanted better,
smoother or safer roads (often mentioned as wider roads), a fifth mentioned improving the
safety of cyclists, 12% suggested more off road tracks and 18% did not know. Only 3% of
those who ride thought there was nothing to improve.
The picture is not as clear in relation to walking facilities with a third of the random sample
wanting better paths while a similar proportion wanted footpaths in their area and over a
quarter of the sample wanted more walking tracks. A fifth of the random sample mentioned
better safety for walkers and it appears that this safety refers to personal safety (e.g. from
thugs) rather than safety from tripping etc.
A third of the random sample did not know what Council could do to encourage more people
to ride bikes and 13% said there was nothing more Council could do. The remaining 55% of
respondents made a range of suggestions with the main suggestions being to provide cycle
lanes (19% of the random sample), to improve road safety (14%), to run promotions (10%).
Over half of the school sample did not know what Council could do to encourage more people
to ride bikes. The main suggestions tended to mirror the random sample and covered cycle
lanes and improved road safety.
A third of the random sample also did not know what Council could do to encourage more
people to walk and 19% said there was nothing Council could do. Fifty percent of
respondents made a range of suggestions. Almost half suggested some sort of promotion,
20% suggested better footpaths and tracks, 12% suggested making walking safer, 3% better
lighting, 7% greater dog control and 8% suggested more scenic tracks.
9.2.9 Safety
Respondents were asked to rate the safety of cycling and walking in Gisborne on a scale
from 1 to 10.
Only a third of the random sample felt that Gisborne was safe to cycle around (scores 8-10),
16% felt Gisborne was unsafe to cycle around (scores 0-3) while 39% rated this as neutral
with (scores 4-6). The safety index for the random sample was 55.6. Those who felt unsafe
tended to mention poor driving, lack of cycle lanes, roundabouts, traffic and narrow roads as
their main concerns. The school sample respondents appeared much more positive about
the safety of cycling in Gisborne and this probably infers that many young people do not
recognise the dangers around them. Almost half felt Gisborne was safe and only 5% felt
Gisborne was unsafe to cycle around.
By comparison walking safety was rated significantly higher than cycling safety with 62% of
the random sample feeling safe walking while only 7% felt unsafe. Personal safety was the
main concern of these respondents although footpaths needing repairs were also of concern.
In 1999-2003 18% of the casualties on Gisborne urban roads were cyclists, compared to only
9% in the rest of New Zealand and 12% in a peer group of similar districts. It is noted however
that LTSA reports for 1997/1998 indicate that a relatively high percentage of total trips are
made by cycle in the Gisborne District (3.3%) compared to national average (1.9%).
The proportion of all road casualties in the Gisborne District made up by cyclists has increased
from approximately 5% in 1994 1999 to 11% in 2001-2003.
While casualty rates for other road users have been declining, the number of cyclist casualties
on roads in the Gisborne District generally increased at a rate of approximately 0.4 casualties
per year in the period 1994-2003. It is not known whether there has been a concurrent
increase in cycling in this period. National trends show a decrease in cycling trips from 3.6% to
1.8% of household travel trips.
Intersections, other vehicles and children have been the main trouble areas for cycle safety:
87 crashes involving cyclists in Gisborne District were reported to the police in 2000-Dec 2004;
95% of these reported crashes also involved a motor vehicle;
62% of these crashes occurred at intersections.
53% of these crashes were crossing/turning, 25% were rear end obstructions and 13% were
overtaking crashes;
LTSA reports that cyclists were at fault or partly at fault in only 43% of the crashes, motor
vehicle drivers were at fault or partly at fault in 63% of the crashes;
42% of the cycle casualties in the Gisborne District in the period 1999-2003 were aged 10-14 and
13% were aged 15-19. It is expected that the statistics will be similar for the period 2000-2004.
Pedestrian road safety trends are perhaps not quite as worrying, although there is room for
significant improvement. Again, children are a major trouble area. LTSA reports:
63 pedestrians were involved in crashes in the Gisborne District in 2000 2004;
Approximately 13% of the casualties on Gisborne urban roads in 1999-2003 were pedestrians.
This percentage is comparable with the rest of New Zealand;
The proportion of all road casualties in the Gisborne District made up by pedestrians has been
relatively constant in the period 1994-2003;
29% of pedestrian casualties in the Gisborne District in 1999-2003 were aged 5-9, 12% were
aged 10-14 and 10% were aged 15-19;
The number of pedestrian casualties on roads in the Gisborne District generally decreasing at a
rate of approximately 0.6 casualties per year in the period 1994-2003. It is not known whether
walking has also decreased in this period however LTSA reports indicate that nationally walking
trips dropped from 21% to 19% of household travel trips in the period 1989 to 1998.
11
LTSA, Travel Survey Report 1997/1998 (LTSA, Wellington, June 2000), LTSA, Gisborne District 1999 to 2003 Road Safety Report (Engineering
Section LTSA, Napier, June 2004) and LTSA, Crash List Detail Report, Gisborne 2000-2004, 10 September 2004.
Although roads are an important part of the cycling transport network the majority are
designed first and foremost for motor vehicles, rather than to provide the highest levels of
service for cyclists in terms of safety, convenience and comfort. In some areas, such as the
Gisborne City Central Business District, the roads are so unsuited to cyclists that most
cyclists avoid riding in these areas and they effectively do not form part of the existing cycle
network.
Councils standard is to provide footpaths on both sides of the road in commercial shopping
areas and in residential areas on well trafficked, connecting routes; otherwise a footpath is
provided to one side of the street. Funding of $100,000 annually was allocated in the
2004/2005 LTCCP for footpath upgrading, which is double that of the funding for previous
years. Funding will increase to $180,000 in 2007/08.
Langford Fallon Reserve is only about 22 hectares. As a mountain bike park, this is very
small. Eskdale Mountain Bike Park near Napier for example is set amongst 600 hectares of
forest. The reserve also does not cater to advanced riders and opportunities to provide more
advanced tracks are limited by the potential conflict with and danger to other users of the
reserve. The reserve management plan envisions that this mixed use will continue in the
future.12 The reserve is not well suited to hold even small events because of limited parking,
short length of tracks and lack of flat areas for participants to congregate.
Other mountain biking opportunities do exist on unsealed roads, forestry tracks and private
land. However their attractiveness and potential use is limited by the need to obtain permits
or other permission, seasonality, that they are promoted mainly by word-of mouth, and that
the tracks are not designed specifically for the needs of mountain bikers.
Track Cycling Facilities - Gisborne District does not have a velodrome (an oval cycling
track) to cater for the sport of track cycling.
Non-Technical Off-Road Recreational Cycling Areas - Several leisurely routes such as the
Riverbank Walkway, along the tracks in the Botanic Gardens and through the open spaces in
Council reserves are available to cyclists without mountain biking equipment or technical
skills. Other than for families with young children, these areas are likely to provide only part
of a recreational route (in conjunction with the road network) rather than a complete route.
12
Langford Fallon Reserve Draft Management Plan, Gisborne District Council, 2001.
Beaches - Beaches are an important area for recreational walking. Most walking occurs
along the sand (when tides permit) but there is also a formed walkway along Waikanae
Beach.
Issues identified by the community have been separated into two categories, those relating to
infrastructure and safety issues and those issues relating to education and promotion of walking and
cycling activities. All the issues identified are detailed below:
13
Refer Section on Road Safety Record
10.1.4 Layby areas are not recognised, for maintenance purposes, as cycleways
Neglecting to resurface and clean shoulder or layby area of carriageway, which is
used by cyclists which causes cyclists to ride on the smooth side of the white line,
therefore holding up traffic and endangering themselves. The surface of State
Highway 35 at Wainui Road within the 50km/hour area is particularly a problem - no
new surface was applied to the layby/cycleway area, causing issues of uneven
surface for cyclists.
Combined parking lane/cycle track on main roads such as Ormond Road, is
dangerous and the surface is far too rough.
Inconvenience and risk caused by need to avoid obstacles, either litter, glass or poor
road surfaces at the edge of carriageway.
Glass on road is a major issue for cyclists glass remains for a long time, causing
punctures and forcing cyclists into vehicle lanes which is unsafe.
The current cycle lanes [shoulders] are inadequate. They are often taken up by cars
which creates a dangerous situation for cyclists riding around them.
Lack of proper shoulders on the highways from Gisborne to Napier, Gisborne to
Opotiki and from Gisborne up the East Coast. Transit needs to recognise these are
potential cycle routes.
10.1.6 Conflict between motor vehicles, walkers and cyclists reduces safety
Inadequate provision for pedestrians to cross main roads, especially children and
elderly. Lack of priority given to quick and efficient movement of cyclists and walkers
versus motor vehicles eg, Awapuni, Ormond and Wainui Roads, Girls High School
students.
Ageing population suggests that there will be increased usage of mobility scooters on
footpaths and tracks.
It is not safe to put walkers and cyclists together, or cars and cyclists together, unless
the network design clearly separates each activity with sufficient space.
10.1.7 Lack of maintenance of pedestrian or cycle routes makes their use unsafe
Footpaths and road surfaces are uneven and unsafe on some popular walking
routes, e.g. glass on roads and footpaths.
Maintenance of suburban walking routes e.g. overhanging trees, encroaching
shrubbery and plants, vehicles parked across pathways, disrepair of paths.
There is a lack of consistency in the placement of footpaths when only one side of the
street is paved e.g. Stout Street. This is inconvenient for walkers but also dangerous
because the road must be crossed to continue on the footpath, this is particularly
difficult for those who are disabled or frail.
Riverside Road carriageway is hazardous for cyclists in some sections and the
footpath is hazardous for walkers due to the uneven surface and lack of safety
barriers to prevent falling into river.
Poor state and safety of some walking tracks and routes eg, Haumanutua Stream
Bridge underpass track is not maintained and not safe for children to use walking to
school.
There is a lack of maintenance of city walking/cycling bridges.
The footpath from the Skate Board Bowl to Waikanae Beach is used by hundreds of
tourists and locals each year and is in urgent need of attention.
Kaiti Hill requires more development e.g. a circular track, and appropriate
maintenance of existing tracks.
10.1.9 Lack of promotion and development of new and safer routes continues to discourage
participation in walking and cycling
Lack of leadership and coordinated promotion and development of potential
alternative routes that would appeal to tourists or recreational cyclists and walkers
eg, to Wainui and northwards or along the coastline south, means that these
landscape assets are not being utilised to benefit the community in an economic or
health sense.
Historically a lack of funding for new routes e.g. Wainui, western industrial and
Riverside Road routes.
Compared to other cities Gisborne has a lack of green belt areas with developed
walkways. Picturesque routes to walk are not obvious.
There is a lack of longer walking tracks close to the urban area. Te Kuri is the only
such walk of reasonable length close to Gisborne.
The land between the end of Kaiti Beach and Sponge Bay is underutilized. A coastal
track would increase walking and possibly cycling opportunities.
Need to research possible scenic / interesting tourist cycling routes (eg, the Tiniroto
route as an alternative to the Gisborne/Wairoa highway). A small booklet with maps
specifying travel times and distances would be great.
10.1.10 Lack of associated facilities for Walkers and Cyclists discourages participation
There is a lack of provision for safe storage of cycles in urban areas.
Lack of places for people to sit, as many e.g. elderly, cannot go far without a rest but
love and need the exercise. Knowing that there are seats will give such people the
confidence to get out.
Pet care bags and appropriate collection points should be installed along walkways
and in parks as available in other cities.
10.1.12 Behaviour of Cyclists and Pedestrians and Motorists, creates additional hazards
Behaviour of cyclists particularly school children riding three abreast, cyclists
generally riding without helmets or cyclists riding without lights at night.
Children under 10 years of age do not have the ability to judge speed and handle the
complexities of other traffic. Unsupervised cycling by children younger than 10, e.g.
to and from school, should be actively discouraged.
Lack of awareness or regard by motorists for cyclists causes unnecessary accidents
and perception of danger e.g. car doors, cars turning left.
Vehicles sometimes drive at inappropriate speeds on Kaiti Hill, causing risk to
the many pedestrians and runners who visit the Hill.
10.2.2 Lack of information about existing routes and facilities reduces their use
Lack of signage/information at Kaiti Hill about how to get from Hill to Beach and from
Hill around in a circular route.
Signage is critical to identify existence of routes network information and maps
along the route. In some locations signage is inadequate.
10.2.3 Social Attitudes to Walking and Cycling need to be reversed to increase participation
Walking is not seen as a desirable activity by teenagers and young adults, but rather
one that must be endured until cars are available. There is considerable peer
pressure to conform to an image that includes car transport.
Cycling (except for competitive cycling) is even less in favour. Compulsory wearing of
helmets for cycle transport is seen as highly undesirable for its effects on looks in
general and hairstyles in particular.
Free bus service to intermediate school does not encourage cycling or walking.
Need to recognise modern factors that discourage participation.
Motor vehicle promotion and advertising.
Work / life dependency on motor vehicles.
Peer pressure to conform and use motor vehicles.
There is well known evidence as to the benefits of incorporating exercise into daily living patterns in
a manner that is regular and moderate. Activities that meet these requirements and can be
maintained throughout life include walking, gardening and cycling.
Cycle travellers typically spend more per person per day than local people. Cycle tourists (who often
travel only as far in a day as motorists do in an hour) are simply around longer and have more time
to spend their money in our community.
Walking activities have many of the same potential economic benefits as cycling activities.
Travellers often do not have their own vehicles and will tend to walk around urban areas more
perhaps than locals. Attractive, well signposted walking routes will add to a positive impression of
the district. Medium distance walking tracks that connect to provide a more versatile set of walking
opportunities, would greatly benefit the tourist community and enhance the economic benefits that
flow from enticing visitors to stay additional nights and to come to town in the first instances.
Cycling and walking can have economic advantages for our transportation system by:
Reducing the number of trips made by cars, thereby reducing congestion and freeing up road
space for essential motor vehicle trips.
Reducing costs for construction and maintenance of roads.
Reducing costs for provision of parking facilities.
Clearly there are major benefits in enabling even small number of people to walk and cycle regularly.
Because of its low cost, negligible energy consumption and environmental compatibility, cycling
should be planned for as an integral part of the transport system and encouraged and promoted as
a long term sustainable form of transport.
In terms of the purpose of the Strategy, there are two key groups of people in our community:
People who do not participate in walking and / or cycling activities.
People who do participate in walking and / or cycling activities.
Each group identified issues that need to be addressed, in order to achieve the vision of the
Strategy.
There are two components that need to be considered to increase the uptake of walking and other
sustainable transport options like cycling. The first is the environment and the second is human
behaviour. Thus it is not enough to address just one of the key components in isolation. Both
environmental and social issues must be targeted simultaneously.
Better public transport, safe routes, pleasant surroundings and small to medium distances are all
key environmental elements of making walking and cycling attractive. There is a need for education
and promotion so that people want to participate and understand the benefits of walking and
cycling. These benefits are not just around health outcomes. They also include a greater sense of
community, less traffic congestion, greater economic benefits and an increase in creativity,
particularly in children. The benefits are detailed further in Part II of the Strategy.
There are many reasons given in the 2004 Walking and Cycling survey14 by those who do not
participate in walking or cycling activities. These include:
Not interested in walking or cycling as activities.
Preferred other means of transport.
12.3 Participants
Despite the reasons given by those who do not participate, many people choose to walk and cycle for
fitness and recreation, as a family activity and as a mode of transport. For these people there are
issues of safety caused by the existing traffic conditions and the absence of or state of disrepair of
facilities which might prevent them from participating more in these activities.
14
Gisborne District Cycling and Walking Survey as Digi Poll Ltd survey conducted by International Research Consultants Ltd, prepared for
Gisborne District Council in July 2004.
These statutory documents identify resource management issues, objectives, policies and methods
(including rules) to promote the underlying purpose of the sustainable management of natural and
physical resources, as defined in section 5 of the Resource Management Act.
The Walking and Cycling Strategy is not a statutory document and it is intended that it will be broadly
consistent with the resource management objectives and policies identified in the resource
management plans/strategies. Any activities undertaken to implement the strategy will need to
comply with the standards and resource consent requirements provided by the rules in the resource
management plans.
13.1.2 Long Term Council Community Plan and Asset Management Plans
Council is required to prepare a Long-Term Council Community Plan (LTCCP) at least every
three years under the Local Government Act 2002. More simple annual plans are produced
in the intervening years, which support the LTCCP. The LTCCP describes what Council will do
over the next 10 years and why, outcomes Council is working toward and how those activities
will be funded.
The Local Government Act 2002 also requires Council to prepare Asset Management Plans
and to review them. They communicate to Council the development, renewal and
operational programmes and the expenditure required to achieve defined levels of service
from major infrastructural assets. Of these plans, the Roading Asset Management Plan and
the Reserves and Conveniences Management Plan are particularly relevant. The Asset
Management Plans have a significant influence on the LTCCP.
The Walking and Cycling Strategy will interact with the LTCCP and Asset Management Plans:
the strategy will be used to help identify the outcomes, required service levels and projects
included in the LTCCP and Asset Management Plans, which in turn is an important step in the
implementation of the Walking and Cycling Strategy.
Reserve management plans have a number of links to the Walking and Cycling Strategy, for
example:
They indicate present and intended use of each reserve or group of reserves.
They indicate future directions for the development of facilities and infrastructure such
as tracks.
They allow planning for the funding and maintenance of existing facilities.
It is anticipated that the RLTS and this strategy will be interactive. The Walking and Cycling
Strategy will provide input and direction into the RLTS, while the RLTS might indicate
community outcomes, issues and implementation actions that should be taken up in the
Walking and Cycling Strategy.
Given the important role of walking and cycling in active and healthy communities, there is
potential for a large overlap between the Active Recreation Plan and the Cycling and Walking
Strategy. It is likely that the plan will draw on the objectives and projects identified in this
strategy.
The Open Space Strategy identified a number of implementation actions to improve and
extend walking and cycling linkages in the city. A number of these projects have already
been completed, are in progress, or in Councils capital budgets, for example:
Development of a footbridge across the mouth of the Waikanae Stream to enhance the
linkages between the harbour and beach area.
Extension of the CBD walkway along the harbour, through the ex-Bulmer Harvest site over
the proposed footbridge at the mouth of the Waikanae Stream to the statutes of Cook and
Young Nick then up Grey Street back to the city.
Extension of the CBD walkway along the Taruheru River to the Botanical gardens.
Providing sign posted information in respect to trail in the CBD identified as the
Arts and Crafts Trail, Mural Trail and Historic Walk.
The following projects identified in the Open Space Strategy were not implemented when
Walking and Cycling Strategy was prepared (2004-2005) and they have also been taken up
in the Walking and Cycling Strategy:
A walkway from the harbour, along Waikanae stream and eventually out to the airport -
additional esplanade reserves need to be acquired to complete the links.
Part of the overall strategy for the Gisborne Urban Coastal area, as set out in the strategy, is
to enhance linkages to and along the coastline. The strategy notes as desirable actions:
Investigating an extension of the riverbank walkway to the west so that it connects
Midway and Waikanae beaches with the river.
Developing a coastal walkway from Kaiti Beach to Sponge Bay and around to Wainui
Beach.
Acknowledging and interpreting important historic, heritage, geological and cultural
resources through signage, access and lookout points.
Improving cycle and walking access to coastal communities and beaches of Wainui/Okitu
and Makorori.
Consultation during the preparation of the Gisborne Urban Coastal Strategy showed that
there was strong support for the suggested coastal walkway, as well as for a more direct
walkway/cycleway between Gisborne City and Wainui. More generally, feedback on the
Strategy was that there is a need for cycleways/walkways which provide safe routes and
links to coastal areas.
Gisborne District Council (GDC) Long Term Council Community Plan 2004-2014
Land Transport Safety Authority Cycle Network and Route Planning Guide (2004)
Land Transport Safety Authority Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Framework (2003)
NZ Government Getting there on foot, by Cycle - A strategy to advance walking and cycling in New
Zealand Transport (2005)
In July 2004 a phone survey was carried out. It was intended that the survey would provide
information that was representative of the whole community to indicate directions for future
initiatives. Gisborne District Council commissioned the survey and the analysis of results, but
the questions for the survey were developed through a collaborative effort between the
agencies mentioned above and the professional consultants who carried out the survey.
At the end of July a public meeting was organised by Gisborne District Council to relay the
results of the public survey and discuss an initial draft of the strategy. A public invitation was
placed in the Gisborne Herald and invitations were sent to key interest groups.
Representatives of a number of interested agencies (governmental and non governmental),
business, schools and clubs as well as Councillors and independent individuals attended the
meeting.
A copy of the draft strategy was sent to those who attended the public meeting for their
comment. Public comments on the initial draft were also requested via the Gisborne Herald.
A second public meeting was held in September to report back on the comments received and
additional recommendations and comments were recorded.
Council staff continued work on the Strategy - reviewing comments received through
consultation, auditing existing facilities, researching literature and compiling safety statistics
etc. A second draft was been produced for final public consultation.
The Strategy was finalised in early 2005, taking into account the result of public consultation.