Ahn Suhnne Kreutzer Sonata
Ahn Suhnne Kreutzer Sonata
Ahn Suhnne Kreutzer Sonata
This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI
films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some
thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be
from any type o f computer printer.
W
and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.
In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete
IE
manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if
unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate
EV
the deletion.
continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each
original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced
form at the back o f the book.
UMI
A Bell & Howell Information Company
300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Aibor MI 48106*1346 USA
313/761-4700 800/521-0600
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
W
IE
EV
PR
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
HARVARD U N IV E R SIT Y
THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
Division
Department M usic
Committee
Signature
Typed name LEWIS LOCKWOOD
............
Typed name INHQXjD ^RXN1CMANN
Signature ....
Typed name P.4Y-P
LD HUGHES
Date ..danuary...23.,...l,99.7. ..
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
W
IE
EV
PR
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Genre, Style, and Compositional Procedure in Beethoven's "Kreutzer" Sonata, Opus 47
A thesis presented
by
Suhnne Ahn
W
to
IE
The Department of Music
EV
in the subject of
PR
Musicology
Harvard University
Cambridge, Massachusetts
January, 1997
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
UMI N um ber: 9 7 2 1 6 5 1
Copyright 1997 by
Aim, Suhnne
W
All rights reserved.
IE
EV
PR
UMI
300 North Zeeb Road
Ann Arbor, MI 48103
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
I EW
EV
PR
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION
Ludwig van Beethoven's Sonata for Violin and Piano, Opus 47, also known as the
"Kreutzer" Sonata, possesses a rich compositional history. The last movement was
originally composed as the finale to Opus 30, No. 1, but was replaced by another finale for
aesthetic reasons. At a later date, a scheduled concert provided the impetus for the
completion of Opus 47, with the former last movement serving as the compositional
springboard for the entire work. Against this background, this study examines
W
other two movements, the movements are considered in their order of composition
IE
Movement III followed by Movements I and II.
Next follows an examination of the primary sources for Opus 47, with emphasis on
EV
Movements I and II. Transcriptions of relevant sketches from the Wielhorsky Sketchbook
offer tremendous insight into Beethoven's compositional process, including the evolution
of thematic material and the order in which individual sections within movements were
PR
composed. In addition, a comparison between the surviving autograph fragment with the
final version of the work demonstrates the degree of detail Beethoven paid at this late stage
of composition to both the ends of phrases and the continuity between them.
The subtitle of Opus 47, "scritta in uno stile molto concertante, quasi come d'un
sonata. In the final section of this thesis, the mixture of genres and styles in Opus 47 and
the possible influences linked to the convergence of these strains are addressed. Closely
connected to the unusual subtitle is the elevation of the violin from a subordinate participant
to an equal partner. Other influences on the hybrid nature of Opus 47 include Heinrich
Koch's ideas on the genre of concerto and Rodolphe Kreutzer's Grande Sonate, available
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
for the first time in full score. Throughout this study, issues of historical context and
Beethoven's intention to leave Vienna for Paris around the time of Opus 47's composition
arise. External evidence suggests that France and the anticipation of a Parisian audience
were prominent in Beethoven's thoughts, and musical evidence further suggests that this
I EW
EV
PR
Reproduced with permission o f the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
For My Family
I EW
EV
PR
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
C ontents page
Acknowledgements vii
List of Abbreviations viii
Introduction 1
Parti: Analysis
Chapter 1: Analysis of Individual Movements 8
Movement 3
Movement 1
Movement 2
Conclusion
Part II: Sources
Comparison of passages
Conclusions about the cancellation
Brandenburg's completion
Ferdinand Ries's Role Revisited
Speculation on the autograph
The pasteover
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Chapter 6 (cont'd)
Source E The Autograph Fragment as "Sonata Mulattica"
Influences on the Subtitle: Sulzer or Koch
Conclusion 259
Bibliography
W 266
IE
EV
PR
vi
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Research for this project was greatly facilitated by funds from both the Oscar Straus
Schafer Fellowship and the Paine Traveling Fellowship. The latter, in particular, allowed
me to travel to the Beethoven Archiv in Bonn and the British Library in London in order to
examine source material fundamental to this study. Special thanks go to the staff at the
Beethoven Archiv for making rare primary source material available to me. I would also
like to extend my appreciation to the staff at the Eda Kuhn Loeb Music Library at Harvard
who assisted with numerous library requests for microfilms and interlibrary loans. In
particular, I would like to recognize Nym Cooke, Bill Thauer, Julia Sullivan, and Millard
Irion.
To my advisors, I am grateful not only for their help in directing and shaping this
work but also for the generosity with which each gave his valuable time throughout my
years in graduate school. Professor Reinhold Brinkmann offered invaluable advice in
EW
matters of consistency and precision, and Professor David Hughes contributed enormous
clarity and delightful levity in his comments and suggestions for this text. Professor Lewis
Lockwood, my primary advisor, first steered me toward my topic and has never waned in
his enthusiasm for this project. Over the years, I have learned countless lessons from
I
Professor Lockwood, but the most valuable resulted in a renewed appreciation for the
EV
healing power of hard work in a discipline to which one is devoted. His diligence,
strength, and integrity remain models for my future efforts in the field.
Throughout the vicissitudes of graduate school, many people have offered
PR
thoughtful advice and warm encouragement. A group of graduate students in the Music
Department once labelled the "lounge lizards" set a standard for collegiality that I shall
always remember with affection. Similarly, the community of tutors and scholars at
Lowell House headed by Co-Masters Bill and Mary Lee Bossert not only yielded
intellectual stimulation outside the subject of music but also offered a host of enriching
distractions to balance the rigors of writing a dissertation. Friends and colleagues to whom
I wish express my gratitude include Kathryn Welter, Kathleen Marshall, Lesley Williams,
Stephanie and Peter Wollny, Laura and Tom Kozachek, Naomi Andre, Daniel Beller-
McKenna, David Kidger, Roberta Lukes, Anne Stone, Daniel Melamed, Henry
Klumpenhouwer, Graeme Boone, Tim and Lorraine Markey, Sally Hadden and Bob
Berkhofer, and Bill and Eliot Bikales. For guidance and faith, I am especially indebted to
Professor Hilary Bender, whose kindess I can never repay. Finally, my deepest thanks are
saved for my sister and my parents, whose steadfast moral support sustained me
throughout this endeavor.
vii
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
ABBREVIATIONS
Literature
New Grove
W
The New Grove Dictionary o f Music and Musicians, ed.
Stanley Sadie, 20 vols. (London: Macmillan, 1980)
IE
Thayer I, II, III Alexander Wheelock Thayer, Ludwig van Beethoven's
Leben, 3 vols. (Berlin: F. Schneider, 1866, 1872, 1879)
EV
Journals
viii
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Introduction
From the time of its publication in April 1805, Beethoven's Sonata for violin and
piano, Opus 47, has been closely associated with the French virtuoso violinist Rodolphe
Kreutzer (1766-1831), to whom the first edition was dedicated. Before its publication,
however, the work had a previous dedicatee. George Augustus Polgreen Bridgetower, a
"mulatto" violinist of West-Indian and European descent, then residing in England, was the
first to perform the work at a concert in Vienna's Augarten on May 24, 1803, almost two
years before the first publication. Beethoven's admiration for Bridgetower is evident from a
letter in which Beethoven recommends Bridgetower as "a very capable virtuoso who has a
W
complete command of his instrument"1 Other letters indicate that the change of dedication
from Bridgetower to Kreutzer occurred more than a year after the first performance, but
IE
Beethoven's reasons for this change remain open to conjecture.2 Ironically, Rudolph
Kreutzer probably never even performed the work that informally bears his name.3
EV
Colorful circumstances surround the first performance of the sonata with Beethoven
and Bridgetower. First, the completion of Opus 47 was achieved in greate haste, and
Beethoven was so pressed for time while preparing for the concert that he called his friend
PR
Ferdinand Ries (1784-1838) in the early hours before dawn to help him in copying the
parts.4 Second, at the premiere of the work, a delightful exchange between Beethoven and
Bridgetower took place, demonstrating the spontaneity and exuberance filling the
1 Elliot Forbes, ed., Thayer's Life o f Beethoven (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1967),
332; hereafter, Thayer-Forbes.
2 Erich H. Muller, ed., "Beethoven und Simrock," Simrock-Jahrbuch II (Berlin, 1929), 24fT.
4 Thayer-Forbes, 332.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
...[A]t the repetition of the first part of the Presto, I imitated the flight, at the 18th
bar, of the piano forte of this movement thus:
He [Beethoven] jumped up, embraced me, saying: "Noch einmal, mein lieber
Burseh!" ("Once again, my dear boy!") Then he held the open pedal during this
flight, the chord of C as at the ninth bar.5
From Bridgetower, we also have the story that he was denied the dedication of the work
because of a quarrel over a girl with Beethoven. As we shall see later, this may not have
been Beethoven's motive for dedicating the work to Kreutzer. Other circumstances and
EW
influences were more likely the impetus for the dedication change.6
This study of the "Kreutzer" Sonata takes its departure from two general areas of
inquiry: 1) questions and observations which arise from an analysis of the piece and an
examination of its existing primary sources; and 2) the work's apparent mixture of genres
I
EV
and styles as evidenced in its subtitle - and the numerous possible influences that
can be linked to the convergence of these strains in Opus 47. Among these influences, two
of particular importance for us will be Rodolphe Kreutzer's Grande Sonata and Heinrich
PR
the work, we will return to the question of historical context, and of Beethoven's intention
5 Thayer-Forbes, 333.
6 Bridgetower was an intriguing figure in the musical circles of Beethoven's day. He, along with
Joseph Boulogne de Saint-Georges (1739-99), were among the few prominent musicians of African descent
during that time. Hailed as a prodigy, Bridgetower performed a concerto by Giomovichi in the Concert
Spirituel at the age of ten. Capitalizing on his unusual racial background, he was dressed in exotic clothing
and eventually gained the title "African Prince." Later, in London, Bridgetower worked closely with
Giovanni Battista Viotti. For more on Bridgetower, see F.G. Edwards, "George P. Bridgetower and the
Kreutzer Sonata, Musical Times 49 (1908): 302; Betty Matthews, "George Polgreen Bridgtower, Music
Review (1968): 20-26; and Josephine R.B.Wright, "George Polgreen Bridgetower An African Prodigy in
England 1789-99," MQ 66(1980): 65-82. Much of the information in Edwards's 1908 article on
Bridgetower was based on an album of letters once belonging to Arthur Hill. Until recendy, this album,
which includes an autograph letter from Viotti to Bridgetower, was in die possession of a private collector
in Missouri.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
to leave Vienna around the period of the work's composition, in a projected journey to
Paris. The external evidence to suggest that France and the anticipation of a Parisian
audience were prominent in Beethoven's thoughts during the time of Opus 47's
styles into a number of works written at this time, of which Opus 47 stands as an example.
contemporary Ferdinand Ries wrote about the composition of the work: the order of
W
movements followed a reverse chronology. More precisely, the last movement was written
first, followed by the first and second movements. Originally, the last movement was
IE
intended for the A major sonata for violin and piano, Opus 30, No. 1. Beethoven
discarded the idea and composed a new finale for Opus 30, No. I.7 What remained as the
EV
original finale for Opus 30 was thus reserved by Beethoven until the scheduled concert
with Bridgetower became the catalyst for the completion of this Opus 47.
As source evidence indicates, the finale, composed before the rest of Opus 47, in
PR
fact became a springboard for the work as a whole. The connections between Opus 47 and
Opus 30 have been addressed at length by two scholars. Richard Kramer's 1973
dissertation on the Opus 30 violin sonatas deals with the history, transcription and analysis
of the sketches.8 Since the three violin sonatas in Opus 30 immediately precede Opus 47
in the genre of sonata, and since the last movement to Opus 47 was originally the final
movement to Opus 30, No. 1, Kramer's work has direct bearing on my own. In addition,
7 Franz Gerhard Wegeler and Ferdinand Ries. Biographische Notizen uber Beethoven (Coblenz,
1838), 83; hereafter, Wegeler-Ries.
8 The Sketches fo r Beethoven's Violin Sonatas. Op. 30: History, Transcription, Analysis (Ph.D.
diss. Princeton University, 1973), esp. pp. 30 Iff.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Christopher Reynolds's 1984 article addresses the change in the Finale to Opus 30, No. 1.
Reynolds describes how the "second" finale to Opus 30, No. 1 fits into the work as a
whole.9
To clarify the extant sources, the table below summarizes the various sources and
their locations.
T able o f S o u r c e s
9 "Ends and Means in the Second Finale to Beethoven's op. 30. no. 1," in Beethoven Essays:
Studies in Honor o f Elliot Forbes, ed. Lewis Lockwood and Phyllis Benjamin (Harvard University Press,
1984), 127-145.
10 Sieghard Brandenburg, ed., Ludwig van Beethoven: Kesslersches Skizzenbuch, 2 vols. (Bonn,
1976 and 1978). The volumes consist of facsimile and transcriptions.
11 Natan Fishman, ed., Kniga estdzov Beethoven za 1802-1803 gody 3 vols. (Moscow, 1962).
The volumes consist of transcription, facsimile, and commentary.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
As the table indicates, the sources exist at several levels. Sketches for the third
movement are found in the Kessler sketchbook, while those for the first and second
"Landsberg 6," by contrast, no music for Opus 47 is to be found. However, the words,
"Sonata scritta in uno sdlo molto concertante [with the word "brillante" crossed o u t], quasi
come d'un concerto" the phrase which eventually came to serve as the famous subtitle to
the work, are scribbled on the inside cover, and their presence in that sketchbook bears
interest for some notable compositional aspects of Opus 47.
In addition to the three sketchbooks, there are three important sources related to
EW
Opus 47 to which several scholars have made reference during the past two decades. In
1980 Sieghard Brandenburg first described in detail two of these sources.12 The first is a
Henle Verlag in Munich. Along with these two sources, there is the possibility that the
The "Vorautograph" contains in score format the exposition for the first movement
PR
of Opus 47. Building on previous work by Fishman, Forbes, and Tyson, Brandenburg
uses the "Vorautograph" to re-examine the evidence surrounding the genesis of Opus 47.13
The existence of the "Vorautograph" confirms the numerous contemporary accounts that
Bridgetower was indeed the original dedicatee of the work. It also contains in Beethoven's
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Brischdauer gran pazzo e compositore mulattico." Brandenburg challenges Forbes's
previous conclusion that the sonata was completed considerably before Bridgetower's
arrival in Vienna. Forbes's argument rests primarily on the placement of the sketches for
movements one and two in the Wielhorsky sketchbook. Brandenburg, however, takes
issue with this idea based on a reconstruction of events preceding Bridgetower's arrival in
Brandenburg does not identify them, he differentiates among the thiee and labels the
contribution of each within the manuscript.
Finally, in addition to the "Vorautograph", the engraver's copy, and the autograph,
W
there are two editions of the work: the first, Simrock's first edition and another early
edition of Opus 47 which was printed by Birchall in London.15 Tyson first asserted the
IE
possibility that an English edition of Opus 47 may have been published based on another
line of sources that did not survive. However, Brandenburg concluded in 1980 that the
EV
on the part of Beethoven, particularly concerning his writings in the genre of concerto.
Beethoven's curious reference to the genre of concerto in this sonata both serves as a point
of interpretative interest and provides a hint for an important line of inquiry. The final
inscription which appeared on the title page of Simrock's first edition contained the phrase,
15 See Tyson, The Authentic English Editions o f Beethoven (London: Faber & Faber, 1963),
49ff.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
"Sonata, scritta in uno stilo molto concertante, quasi come d'un concerto." This
description was so striking that a contemporary writer in the Allgemeine Musikalische
Zeitung called attention to it in the opening of his review of the work, describing the title
By the inclusion of such an addendum to what is outwardly a sonata for violin and
piano, Beethoven seems to have characterized his own work as a departure from his
previous sonatas for violin and piano. One is naturally led to wonder to what end or ends
he invokes the term, "concerto." Yet a number of studies of Opus 47 appear to have
sidestepped this second issue, or else led away altogether from a comparison of the work
with the genre of concerto.
W
In his 1988 article, Owen Jander suggested that certain ideas found in Johann
Georg Sulzeris Allgemeine Theorie der Schonen K'unste were influential to Beethoven's
IE
notions about the concerto.18 Jander argues that the underlying aesthetic of dialogue was
crucial to the genre of concerto and is manifested in the Opus 47 Sonata. One of the aims
EV
in the second half of the present work will be to re-examine the arguments put forth by
Jander, and to introduce into this discussion the work of Heinrich Christoph Koch, a
theorist and contemporary of Sulzer. Koch's theories on the genre of concerto illuminate
PR
In addition, the second half of this study will search for other sources of influence
on Beethoven's Opus 47. Specifically, we shall examine the relation of Opus 47 to a
sonata written by its namesake, Rodolphe Kreutzer. We shall also draw connections to
other compositions within Beethoven's own oeuvre, especially in the genres of concerto
and relatives of the concerto.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Chapter 1: Analysis
In his celebrated Essays in Musical Analysis, Sir Donald Francis Tovey wrote of
Beethoven's Opus 47, "So popular a classic as the 'Kreutzer' sonata needs either no
analysis or else a very detailed one."1 Devoting little more than a page to his discussion of
Beethoven's masterpiece for violin and piano, Tovey decided the former was more
appropriate.
exhaustive motivic analysis of the sonata, demonstrating motivic connections between all
three movements.2 Reti's work stressed the importance of the half-step motive in Opus 47
by pointing out every occurence and permutation of the motive in the work. Since Red
chose to emphasize what he called "thematic particles," his analysis overlooked large-scale
EW
harmonic features. More importantly, Red wrote his analysis without the knowledge that
the finale was written before movements one and two.
intended as the finale to Opus 30, No. 1, but it was considered too brilliant, and Beethoven
chose instead to write another finale for that work. To the completed and now "free
standing" movement, Beethoven then wrote the first and second movements of what
PR
became Opus 47. The sketchbooks reveal that these first two movements were both written
quickly and within close proximity to one another in time. Red's demonstration of the
strong motivic connections between movements one and two supports this as well,
indicating the close relation is in part due to the speed with which the two were written.
In another analysis of Opus 47, Han Hollander supplemented the work of Red to
some extent.3 Hollander observed the similarity of main themes in all movements, while
1 Donald R ands Tovey, Essays in Musical Analysis: Chamber Music (London: Oxford
University Press, 1945), 135-136.
2 Rudolph Rdti, T h e Thematic Pitch of the Kreutzer Sonata," Thematic Patterns in Sonatas o f
Beethoven (New York: The MacMillan Company, 1967), 145-165.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
keeping in mind the chronology of the composition of the movements. With the
knowledge that the finale was originally composed for Opus 30, No. 1, Hollander also
draws similarities between the main themes from the first movement of Opus 30, No.l and
the other movements of Opus 47.
Among the remaining writers on Opus 47, there are representatives of extremes.
W
Rosen's The Classical Style, but Rosen makes only passing references to the work in three
passages. In one of these, he cites Beethoven's Opus 47 as a work in which the finale
IE
seems "inadequate even when judged by classical standards."6
EV
ornamental, and a little precious, the style of the F major Variations for Piano, Opus
34 without the tatter's original harmonic scheme and dramatic contrasts, but with a
more artistic care for detail; the finale, a light and brilliant tarantella, was written for
another sonata altogether. Beethoven never again presented such a hybrid as one
work. 7
5 Max Rostal, "Sonata No. 9 in A major. Op. 47," in Ludwig van Beethoven, die Sonaten fu r
Klavier und Violine, transl. Horace and Anna Rosenberg (London: Toccata Press, 1985), 131-161.
6 Charles Rosen, The Classical Style (New York: W.W. Norton, 1972), 277.
7 Rosen, 399.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Clearly in Rosen's mind, the finale is anticlimactic to the rest of the work. This sentiment
was shared by the first reviewer of the work and also by Leo Tolstoy in his famous short
story entitled, "The Kreutzer Sonata."8
Without dismissing Rosen's judgment of the third movement as the least innovative
understanding more clearly the compositional relationship among the three movements.
It is also possible to argue that the structural connections between finale on the one hand
and movements one and two on the other are more discernible than Rosen's statement
indicates. Reti gave a partial demonstration of this through his motivic analysis. I believe a
broader analysis of the piece, following the order of composition (i.e., Mvt III, I, II), bears
this out as well. EW
Keeping in mind that Opus 47 was not the only piece in which the Beethoven's last
movement was the first in order of composition, we can begin by posing the question in
I
regard to Opus 47, whether this is true of the relation between the last movement and the
EV
first and second.9 Was the third movement, written as it was for the Opus 30, No. 1
sonata, merely "tacked on" to movements one and two of Opus 47 without much attention
to structural coherence?
PR
8 The first reviewer of Opus 47 found the finale "the most bizarre movement of all." AMZ
1805, translated and reprinted in Brandenburg's "Violin Sonatas, Cello Sonatas, and Variations" in Ludwig
van Beethoven (New York: Praeger Publisher, 1970), 135-149. In Tolstoy's work we have the following
description: "After the presto they played the attractive but unoriginal andante with its rather trite
variations, and then the finale, which is really weak." The Kreutzer Sonata, transl. David McDuff (London:
Penguin Books, 1985), 98. For an unusual discussion of Tolstoy's short story with regard to the issue of
mysogyny and the use of Beethoven's music in the narrative, see Richard Leppert's T h e Piano, Misogyny,
and The Kreutzer Sonata," in The Sight o f Sound: Music, Representation, and the History o f the Body
(Berkeley, California: University of California Press, 1993), 153-271.
9 See Lewis Lockwood, "The Earliest Sketches for the Eroica Symphony," in Beethoven: Studies
in the Creative Process (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992), 134-150. The situation
resembles the composition of "Eroica," but not exactly. In his Third Symphony, Beethoven's earlier work
on the variations provided the springboard for the composition of the rest of the work. When it came to the
actual composition of the symphony, he re-composed for orchestra. In the case of Opus 47, Beethoven had
already composed the movement by the time the first two movements were written. This will be discussed
at greater length in the chapter on the engraver's copy.
10
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.