Duncanson et al.

BMC Public Health 2014, 14:1262

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/1262

RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access

Peer education is a feasible method of

disseminating information related to child
nutrition and feeding between new mothers
Kerith Duncanson1,2,3*, Tracy Burrows1,2 and Clare Collins1,2

Abstract
Background: This study examined whether peer education based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour is a feasible
method to share and disseminate nutrition and feeding information between mothers of babies and toddlers.
Methods: The Peer Educator Nutrition Training (PeerENT) study was a feasibility study. Participants
were recruited from an existing cohort of mothers of six month to two year olds. An online survey tool
was used to collect and collate data, which was then analysed using STATA statistical software.
Results: Thirty four mothers (35%) responded to the survey with 76% (n = 26) either very interested (n = 13) or
interested (n = 13) in receiving child nutrition information from a trained peer educator, preferably in a
structured group session. Sixty five per cent (n = 22) were interested or very interested in becoming a peer
nutrition educator. The preferred methods of communicating information to other parents were online (n = 17),
informally in a social group (n = 16) and via a face-to-face group program (n = 14). Participants predicted they
would share child nutrition information with an average of fifteen people, a total reach of 510 individuals.
Conclusions: High levels of interest in peer educator training and the capacity for mothers to share resources widely
and easily via social media offers a potential opportunity to disseminate evidence-based nutrition information. A pilot
study investigating the impact of a well-designed, theory-based peer nutrition education program on the child feeding
practices of mothers with children aged between six months to two years is warranted.

Background [7]. High levels of concern regarding childrens appetite,

The nutritional quality and variety of a young childs eating patterns and growth are commonly reported topics
dietary intake is heavily influenced by the feeding prac- addressed by health professionals [8], and parents
tices of their parents [1-4], particularly in the first five regularly express the desire for more comprehensive
years of life. Parental factors including life experience, guidance in these areas [9].
health status, education and self-efficacy impact on child While health professionals continue to be highly utilised
feeding, in combination with interpersonal relationships and influential sources of nutrition information for par-
and environmental factors such as geographic location ents of young children, emerging evidence suggests that
and food costs [1,5,6]. parents are more likely to change their child-feeding prac-
Parents of children under the age of two years are tices as a result of peer influence, rather than through edu-
considered to be particularly receptive to knowledge and cation by health professionals [10]. Conceptually, this can
skill development around parenting and the promotion of be explained within the Theory of Planned Behaviour
healthy family eating and physical activity behaviours (TPB) [11] framework in which an individuals behaviour
is determined by complex interactions between their
beliefs and attitudes. Of particular relevance are the TPB
* Correspondence: kerith.duncanson@uon.edu.au
1Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, constructs of individual perceptions about relevant others
The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, beliefs (subjective norms) and influences of significant
Australia 2Priority Research Center in Physical Activity and Nutrition, The others on beliefs (normative beliefs). Normative beliefs
University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article and resulting subjective norms of parents in relation to

2014 Duncanson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative
Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data
made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Duncanson et al. BMC Public Health 2014, 14:1262 Page 2 of 7 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/1262

child-feeding are largely attributable to the peer environ- their peer group [10]. External factors including food ad-
ment of the parent [12]. vertising, peer influences and extended family
New mothers can be one of the most socially isolated perpetuated this ambivalence towards change. This
groups in communities [7], potentially increasing mental reinforces the need to train mothers as peer nutrition
and physical health risk for these women and their fam- educators in order for them to positively influence
ilies. Such social isolation may be exacerbated by geo- nutrition behaviours within their social groups.
graphic isolation of rurality [13,14]. In Australia, this In addition to helping individuals make healthy choices,
potential social isolation is addressed in communities information and education are essential for socialising target
through the establishment of New Parent Groups [7] by groups into health promoting norms and behaviours [18].
Early Childhood Nurses [15], who have regular contact Health information can be distributed through a var-iety of
with the mothers and babies. From the time of birth of a mediums and settings. The capacity to use computer
parents first child, strong social connections form technology [23] and the Internet, through applications such
between parents with infants of a similar age [16]. The as Facebook to distribute health information quickly, exten-
parents peers become their support network, providing sively and within specific target groups, make these poten-
social connectedness, a source of shared information and tial vehicles for sharing health information [24].
peer education [15,16]. We propose that embedding relevant, evidence-based
Peer health education is the process of sharing health child feeding and child nutrition information in a well-
related information from person to person among mem- designed theory based peer educator model will improve
bers of a specific community, in order to gain the neces- the child feeding practices of parents within groups of
sary knowledge and skills and facilitate peers to make first-time mothers. However, we need to first establish if
informed decisions about health related issues, and this approach is acceptable to the target group. There-fore,
achieve a positive health outcome [17]. Existing research this study aims to establish whether first-time mothers are
suggests that people are more likely to engage and change interested in receiving additional child nu-trition and
their diet-related behaviours if the educator is from their feeding information, in what format or con-text they
own demographic and faces similar concerns [16]. Peer would like to receive this information, and whether peer
educators can gather and share information in a way that educator delivered information would be considered an
is more applicable, practical and appealing to the target appropriate way to share and disseminate nutrition and
audience, and therefore may be more likely to result in feeding information.
behaviour change [18]. Previously identified ad-vantages
of using peer educators in nutrition education include cost Methods
effectiveness, culturally appropriateness and optimal use The Peer Education Nutrition Training (PeerENT) study
of resources [19]. The benefits of peer educator models was a cross-sectional feasibility study. Participants were
extend to the leaders themselves, who report recruited from an existing cohort of mothers of children
improvements in skill development, community status, aged six months to two years from the North Coast, NSW
increased caring for others and increased self-esteem [20]. Australia who had previously subscribed to a quarterly
child nutrition information email service after participat-
Trained peer trained educators have been used effect- ing in New Parents Groups between 2010 and 2012.
ively to influence health behaviours in a variety of set- The regular quarterly email was distributed to mothers by
tings and at various levels of intervention [21,22]. The the Community Nutritionist in mid-November 2012,
most widely reported use of peer facilitators has been in accompanied by an invitation to complete an anonymous
order to increase the uptake of health promotion mes- online survey, which was included in the email as a hyper-
sages. In a study that compared a peer developed pre-natal link. The online survey email distribution was repeated twice
breast feeding education program to a hospital based within a two week period from mid to late November 2012
nurse led class, Rempel et al. [22] reported that peer for those who had not responded. The survey was preceded
facilitators had a stronger influence on mothers intentions by a participant information section, which re-quired consent
to continue breast feeding their child for more than 9 from participating mothers before acces-sing a brief
months. description of the rationale for the survey and an estimation
In a study of child feeding behaviours and attitudes of 146 of time needed to complete the survey.
parents of children aged two to five years in rural Australia, The survey consisted of 13 questions, including four
it was identified that parents believe that opti-mal child demographic (maternal age, number of children, child age
nutrition is vital [10], however optimal child dietary intake is and postal/zip code) and nine about peer educator training
difficult to attain [10]. Intention to change feeding practices as shown in Table 1.
was restricted by a belief that a childs nutritional intake is The combination of open and closed questions were
above average when compared to developed by the research team to address the primary
Duncanson et al. BMC Public Health 2014, 14:1262 Page 3 of 7 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/1262

Table 1 Survey questions to determine feasibility of peer educator training in the PeerENT study
Outcome measure Survey question Response options n (%)
Current child feeding Where do you go for other information regarding feeding children? Internet 27 (79%)
information sources (could select more than one option)
Friend 21 (62%)
Family 15 (44%)
Nurse 13 (38%)
Doctor 6 (18%)
Dietitian 5 (15%)
Media (magazines, newspapers) 5 (15%)
Other (please specify)
Current nutrition information Do you share any of the information with any of these people? (could Friend 16 (47%)
circulation select more than one option)
Partner 30 (87%)
Family member 10 (30%)
Other (please specify)
Child feeding efficacy Please rate your overall ability and confidence in feeding your child/ Very confident 12 (35%)
ren?
Confident 11 (32%)
Somewhat confident 11 (32%)
Not confident 0 (0%)
Interest in becoming a peer How interested would you be in attending peer educator nutrition Very interested 11 (32%)
nutrition educator training?
Interested 10 (30%)
Somewhat interested 1 (3%)
Not interested 12 (35%)
Time availability (total hours) How much time are you willing to devote to peer educator nutrition None 0 (0%)
training?
Up to 1 hour 1 (3%)
1 2 hours 13 (38%)
2 4 hours 5 (15%)
4 or more hours 3 (9%)
Format of peer educator What format would be suitable for delivering peer educator training? Group 22 (65%)
training (could choose more than one option)
Self-directed 20 (60%)
Online 15 (45%)
Other Combined
Format for peer nutrition How receptive do you feel other parents would be about receiving Very receptive 13 (38%)
education delivery nutrition information from trained peers?
Receptive 13 (38%)
Unreceptive 8 (24%)
Comments
What format would suit the delivery of peer nutrition education to Structured group program 14 (41%)
other parents?
Informally in peer/ friendship 16 (47%)
group
Social media/online 17 (50%)
Other comments
Please indicate the approximate number of people you are likely to Number _______ 510 (total)
share child nutrition information with?

outcomes measures, based on the components of the Survey Monkey (Professional version Palo Alto,
Theory of Planned Behaviour. The survey was piloted for California, USA), an online survey tool was used to col-
readability and participant burden with 11 mothers prior lect and collate data that was exported for analysis to
to survey implementation. STATA statistical software (Version 10, College Station,
Duncanson et al. BMC Public Health 2014, 14:1262 Page 4 of 7
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/1262

Texas USA). Descriptive statistics including frequen- Table 2 Demographic characteristics of participants in
cies, percentages and proportions were completed, and the Peer Educator Nutrition Training (PeerENT) study to
used to produce tables and figures. determine the feasibility of training new mothers as peer
Approval for the Feeding Healthy Food to Kids study nutrition educators
was obtained in March 2009 from Hunter New England Mother age Responses (n = 34)
Human Research Ethics Committee. Reference No: 08/ 18 to 24 years 2 (6%)
12/17/4.02. A variation to this ethics application was ap- 25 31 years 14 (41%)
proved in July 2012 to conduct a peer educator nutrition 32 41 years 17(50%)
feasibility survey.
42 51 years 1 (3%)
Number of children Responses (n = 34)
Results
Surveys were emailed to 115 new mothers. Two partici- One 27 (79%)
pants chose the opt out option and 15 email addresses Two 6 (18%)
were not current, leaving 98 potential participants (Figure 1). Three 1 (3%)
Thirty four of the 98 eligible mothers (35%) responded to Child age Responses (n = 33)
the survey, and of these 31 out of 34 participants (91%)
6 - 8 months 3 (9%)
completed the entire survey.
9 11 months 4 (12%)
Fifty percent of the 34 participants were mothers aged
3241 years (n = 17) and 41% were aged 2531 years. 12 15 months 0 (0%)
Twenty seven participants (79%) had one child, six had 16 18 months 4 (12%)
two children and one had three children. The child age 19 21 months 5 (15%)
range was 6 months (11%) to over two years (47%). 21 24 months 1 (3%)
Demographic details are summarised in Table 2.
Over 24 months 16 (47%)
Twenty three mothers (67%) rated themselves as
confident or very confident and eleven (32%) as somewhat
confident for child feeding efficacy. In descending order, their child/ren to consume healthy foods from a trained
participants rated a structured program (65%), social volunteer peer educator, with comments such as In my
media/online (60%) and informally in peer groups (45%) opinion, all tips and advice are greatly appreciated.
as their preferred formats for the delivery of nutrition in- One participant expressed concern about peer educa-
formation and advice. Mothers commented that a com- tion, as she felt the advice given may not be based on
bination of different approaches would increase the best practice rather drawn from personal experiences,
overall participation rate. A mix of all these would reach commenting that the parent might still let their own
the greatest number of parents, Online is also good for values in, rather than give the right advice.
some people, but I prefer talking with my mothers group. Sixty five percent of the 34 respondents (n = 22) re-
Seventy six percent felt that other parents would be ei- ported some interest in receiving additional training to
ther very interested (n = 13) or interested (n = 13) in re- learn how to share nutrition and child feeding informa-
ceiving nutrition information and advice on how to get tion with other parents in an unpaid capacity, of whom

Assessed for eligibility (n = 115)

Did not return survey (n = 64) Excluded (n = 17)

- Chose to opt out (n = 2)

- Email address not current (n = 15)
Survey
Participation
n= 34

Completed Survey (n = 31) Partially completed survey (n = 3)

Figure 1 Flow of participants through the Peer Educator Nutrition Training feasibility study.
Duncanson et al. BMC Public Health 2014, 14:1262 Page 5 of 7 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/1262

50% were very interested. Eight of the twenty two While the majority of parents were supportive of peer
mothers were willing to devote more than 2 hours of their educator training, some resistance was expressed by par-
time to additional nutrition and child feeding training. ticipants who felt that peer education may impact the
All mothers who expressed interest in nutrition train-ing quality and consistency of information being provided.
(n = 22) felt that it would be best if the nutrition and child This concern reflects those expressed in previous studies
feeding training was in a structured group session with in which peer educator models have been developed,
other parents, with seven parents also indicating that implemented and evaluated [19-21,24,27]. It is therefore
online training would be acceptable. However, after imperative that the nutrition education content of peer
receiving the training, the preferred methods of commu- educator training is appropriate for delivery by lay popu-
nicating this information to other parents were; online (n lation, and incorporate evidence-based peer education
= 17), informally in a peer or friendship group (n = 16) principles.
and in a group program (n = 14). The preference for on- Use of Internet, both as the participants current source
line training was supported by comments such as of nutrition information and their desired mode of
Working full time with 2 children, online info is great! delivery of peer education, inform the direction of future
The new mothers in this study cited the Internet (n = 27), research. The challenge of ensuring the integrity of
friends (n = 21) and family (n = 15) as their usual sources of nutrition information supplied and received via the
nutrition information. Health professionals were less often Internet can be addressed by providing peer educators
cited sources of nutrition information, with nurses cited by with simple, informative, succinct child nutrition re-
13 participants, doctors by 6 and dietitians cited by 5 sources that can easily be shared via the Internet [24]. The
participants. Eighty seven percent of mothers shared viability of the peer education process may be fur-ther
nutrition information that had been provided to them with enhanced by ensuring that an Accredited Practicing
their partners and 47% with their friends. The mean Dietitian is available as a support resource for peer edu-
estimated number of contacts which each participant cators, and this needs further research.
indicated they would share information with was fifteen, or a Dissemination of information to peers in online for-ums
total reach of 510 from this study cohort, excluding po- provides a potentially effective combination of peer
tential overlap between participant social networks. education delivery to friends, with the preference for
Internet or social media as a medium. This finding sug-
Discussion gests that a model for further research would combine
Despite the time pressures and stresses associated with face-to-face peer nutrition educator training, to train as
parenthood [25,26], participants seem to be motivated to many peers in new parent cohorts as possible, with
seek nutrition information for their own purposes. quality resources that can be shared via social media and
Responses to this survey demonstrated an encouraging other electronic mediums. The predicted capacity of par-
level of interest by mothers in participating in a peer ticipants to share the nutrition resources and informa-tion
educator nutrition training (Peer ENT) program, both as with an average of fifteen people, shows that the reach of
participants and as peer leaders. They were equally will- peer nutrition education is at least ten times the capacity
ing to devote their personal time to undertake nutrition of individual interactions.
training in peer leadership and to share this information Limitations to the study include the use of self-reported
within their parenting peer groups. data, potentially resulting in social desirability reporting
Results of this study reinforce the results of previous re- bias. The low response rate was nevertheless consistent
search into child nutrition education for new parents [27] with other studies using online surveys [29] and studies
and identified the potential for further research into peer that included surveys of new mothers [30]. The study
educator training for nutrition education. The willingness cohort was small, predominantly mothers and recruited
of mothers in this study to become peer educators was from a regional area, which could influence the
consistent with the success of train-the-trainer models in generalisability of the results into other population
other study populations [19-21]. An unexpected posi-tive groups. The potential for using peer educator training for
finding was the willingness of mothers with young new fathers, and less motivated parents requires further
children to devote two hours or more of their time to par- investigation. However, given that this study was aimed at
ticipate in peer educator training. New mothers are no- establishing the feasibility of peer educator training, the
toriously time-poor and difficult to reach as a target group results were of adequate strength to sup-port a pilot peer
[26], so this result provides evidence of these parents mo- educator nutrition training program.
tivation and commitment to child feeding and nutrition.
This result is consistent with previous research indicating Conclusions
that changes in stage of life constitute opportunities to The results of the current survey indicate support for the
engage people in behaviour change [28]. development and testing of a child feeding and
Duncanson et al. BMC Public Health 2014, 14:1262 Page 6 of 7
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/1262

nutrition program to determine the effects of a well Received: 8 March 2014 Accepted: 4 December 2014
designed, theory based peer educator model on the child Published: 12 December 2014

feeding practices of parents. The peer educator training

needs to be relevant to parents with children aged be- References
tween six months to three years and have face-to-face and 1. Campbell K, Crawford D, Hesketh K: Australian parents views on their 56
year-old childrens food choices. Health Promot Int 2006, 22(1):1119.
self-directed delivery options.
2. Duke RE, Bryson S, Hammer LD, Agras WS: The relationship
It is proposed that in areas where new parent groups between parental factors at infancy and parent-reported control
exist, this forum provides an ideal avenue for offering and over childrens eating at age 7. Appetite 2004, 43(3):247252.
3. Fox MK, Pac S, Devaney B, Jankowski L: Feeding infants and toddlers
implementing peer nutrition education. In areas where study: what foods are infants and toddlers eating? J Am Diet Assoc 2004,
new parent groups are not available or accessible, it is 104(1):2230.
possible that peer educator nutrition training could be 4. Golan M, Crow S: Targeting parents exclusively in the treatment of
childhood obesity: long-term results. Obes Res 2004, 12:357361.
arranged in collaboration with early childhood health
5. Batch J, Baur L: Behaviour change involving the whole family
service providers or community based agencies and is more likely to be successful. MJA 2005, 182(3):130135.
interest groups such as breastfeeding support groups, or 6. Johnson L, van Jaarsveld C, Wardle J: Individual and family environment
provided in an online format. correlates differ for consumption of core and non-core foods in children.
Br J Nutr 2011, 105(6):950959.
The finding that new mothers would prefer to deliver 7. Campbell K, Hesketh K, Crawford D, Salmon J, Ball K, McCallum Z: The
nutrition messages to their peers via social media is Infant Food Activity and Nutrition Trial (INFANT) an early intervention to
prevent childhood obesity: cluster-randomised controlled trial.
important, with obvious implications for the type of re-
BMC Public Health 2008, 8(103):123.
sources that need to be developed for the peer educators. 8. Goldfeld SR, Wright M, Oberklaid F: Parents, infants and health care: utilization of
Researchers who are planning to conduct peer educator health services in the first 12 months of life. J Paediatr Child Health

training need to collaborate with information technology 2003, 39:249253.

9. Graham V, Marraffa C, Henry L: Filling the gap Children aged two
experts to develop resources that can be disseminated ap- years or less: Sources of nutrition information used by families and
propriately through social media and other online formats. maternal and child health nurses. Aust J Nutr Diet 1999, 56:209214.
Nutrition resources that are disseminated using the Inter- 10. Duncanson K, Burrows T, Holman B, Collins C: Parents perceptions of
child feeding: a qualitative study based on the Theory of Planned Behavior.
net via peer educators needs to be identifiable as being J Dev Behav Pediatr 2013, 34:227236.
from a reputable source. 11. Ajzen I: The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process
Considerations of online technologies, such as online 1991, 50(2):179211.
12. Campbell K, Hesketh K, Silverii A, Abbott G: Maternal self-efficacy regarding
blogs or the use of avatars are potential applications. This childrens eating and sedentary behaviours in the early years: associations with
could appeal to the first-time parents, who are entering a childrens food intake and sedentary behaviours. Int J Pediatr Obes
new phase of life and may feel isolated. The use of 2010, 5(6):501508.
13. Smith K, Humphreys J, Wilson M: Addressing the health disadvantage of
interactive computer technology by trained peer educators rural populations: how does epidemiological evidence inform rural health
in conjunction with face-to-face education sessions and policies and research? Aust J Rural Health 2008, 16(2):5666.
on-line sharing of nutrition information within and 14. Humphrey J, Gregory G: Celebrating another decade of progress in rural
health: what is the current state of play? Aust J Rural Health 2012,
amongst peer groups is a promising avenue of future
20(3):156163.
research. 15. McLeod E, Campbell K, Hesketh K: Nutrition knowledge: a mediator
between socioeconomic position and diet quality in Australian first-
time mothers. J Am Diet Assoc 2011, 111:696704.
Competing interests
16. Cameron A, Hesketh K, Ball K, Crawford D, Campbell K: Influence
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
of peers on breastfeeding discontinuation among new parents: the
Melbourne InFANT program. Pediatrics 2010, 126(3):e601e607.
Authors contributions 17. Sloane B, Zimmer C: The power of peer health education. Am Coll Health
All authors contributed to study design, survey development and 1993, 41:241245.
literature review preceding the study. KD developed online survey 18. Murphy EM: Promoting Healthy Behavior. Health Bulletin 2.
application, was responsible for recruitment into the study, collated Washington, DC: Population. Reference Bureau; 2005.
and analysed data. TB and CC provided input into statistical analysis 19. Goldfinger J, Arniella G, Wylie-Rosett J, Horowitz CR: Project HEAL: peer
and all authors read and approved the final manuscript. education leads to weight loss in Harlem. J Health Care Poor Underserved
2008, 19(1):180192.
20. Hibbs J, Sandmann L: Psychosocial impact of training and work experience
Acknowledgements on EFNEP paraprofessionals. J Extension 2011, 49(3):3FEA4.
The authors would like to thank the mothers who provided valuable 21. Morton D, Rankin P, Morey P, Kent L, Hurlow T, Chang E, Diehl H:
information and shared their precious time by participating in this The effectiveness of the Complete Health Improvement Program
study. Kerith Duncanson is supported by University of Newcastle (CHIP) in Australasia for reducing selected chronic disease risk
Research Higher Degree RTS funds. factors: a feasibility study. New Zeal Med J 2013, 126(1370):4354.
22. Rempel L, Moore K: Peer-led prenatal breast-feeding education: a viable
Author details alternative to nurse-led education. Midwifery 2012, 28(1):7379.
1
Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of 23. Boulos MNK, Hetherington L, Wheeler S: Second Life: an overview of
Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, the potential of 3-D virtual worlds in medical and health education.
NSW 2308, Australia. 2Priority Research Center in Physical Activity Health Inform Libr J 2007, 24(4):233245.
and Nutrition, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, 24. Leak TM, Benavente L, Goodell LS, Lassiter A, Jones L, Bowen S: EFNEP
Australia. 3117 Becker Road, Forster, NSW 2428, Australia. graduates perspectives on social media to supplement nutrition
Duncanson et al. BMC Public Health 2014, 14:1262 Page 7 of 7 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/1262

education: focus group findings from active users. J Nutr Educ Behav
2014, 46(3):203208.
25. Olsen C: Tracking of food choices across the transition to motherhood.
J Nutr Educ Behav 2005, 37:129136.
26. Miller B, Sollie D: Normal stresses during the transition to parenthood.
Fam Relat 1980, 29:459465.
27. Haire-Joshu D, Elliott MB, Caito NM, Hessler K, Nanney MS, Hale N,
Boehmer TK, Kreuter M, Brownson RC: High 5 for Kids: the impact of
a home visiting program on fruit and vegetable intake of parents and
their preschool children. Prev Med 2008, 47(1):7782.
28. Hesketh K, Campbell K: Opportunities for intervention research during
transitions in the lifecycle. Australasian Epidemiologist 2009, 16(3):3031.
29. Nulty D: The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys.
Assess Eval High Educ 2008, 33:301314.
30. Redshaw M, Henderson J: Fathers engagement in pregnancy and
childbirth: evidence from a national survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
2013, 13(1):70.

doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1262
Cite this article as: Duncanson et al.: Peer education is a feasible
method of disseminating information related to child nutrition and
feeding between new mothers. BMC Public Health 2014 14:1262.

Submit your next manuscript to BioMed

Central and take full advantage of:

Convenient online submission

Thorough peer review
No space constraints or color figure charges
Immediate publication on acceptance
Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar
Research which is freely available for redistribution

Submit your manuscript at

www.biomedcentral.com/submit