Polarization of Light: Malus' Law
Polarization of Light: Malus' Law
Polarization of Light: Malus' Law
Introduction
Light, viewed classically, is a transverse electromagnetic wave. Namely, the underlying os-
cillation (in this case oscillating electric and magnetic fields) is along directions perpendicular
to the direction of propagation. This is in contrast to longitudinal waves, such as sound waves,
in which the oscillation is confined to the direction of propagation. Light is said to be linearly
polarized if its oscillation is confined to one direction (the direction of the oscillation of the
electric field is defined as the direction of polarization). Most light sources in nature emit unpo-
larized light i.e., light consists of many wave trains whose directions of oscillation are completely
random.
Light may be polarized by passing it through a sheet of commercial material called Polaroid,
invented by E.H. Land in 1938. A sheet of Polaroid transmits only the component of light
polarized along a particular direction and absorbs the component perpendicular to that direction.
Consider a light beam in the z direction incident on a Polaroid which has its transmission
axis in the y direction. On the average, half of the incident light has its polarization axis in the y
direction and half in the x direction. Thus half the intensity is transmitted, and the transmitted
light is linearly polarized in the y direction.
Malus law
Suppose we have a second piece of Polaroid whose transmission axis makes an angle with
that of the first one. The E vector of the light between the Polaroids can be resolved into two
components, one parallel and one perpendicular to the transmission axis of the second Polaroid
(see Figure 1). If we call the direction of transmission of the second Polaroid y 0 ,
I ()
= Ey20 = E 2 cos2
If I0
= E 2 is the intensity between the two Polaroids, the intensity transmitted by both of them
would be:
I () = I0 cos2 (1)
This equation is known as Malus Law after its discoverer, E.L. Malus (1775-1812). It applies
to any two polarizing elements whose transmission directions make an angle with each other.
When two polarizing elements are placed in succession in a beam of light as described here, the
1
first is called polarizer and the second is called analyzer. As you will see, no light reaches the
photocell when the polarizer and analyzer are crossed ( = 90 ).
ht
Figure 1: Two Polaroids whose transmission directions make an angle with each other.
The first and last polarizers are oriented at 90 with respect to each other. The second
polarizer has its polarization axis rotated an angle from the first polarizer. Therefore, the
third polarizer is rotated an angle 2 from the second polarizer. The intensity after passing
through the first polarizer is I1 and the intensity after passing through the second polarizer, I2 ,
is given by:
I2 = I1 cos2
2
The intensity after the third polarizer, I3 , is given by:
I3 = I2 cos2 = I1 cos2 cos2 (2)
2 2
Rearranging Equation 2, we obtain:
I1
I3 = sin2 (2) (3)
4
Because the data acquisition begins when the transmitted intensity through Polarizer 3 is a
maximum, the angle measured in the experiment is zero when the second polarizer is 45
from the angle . Thus the angle is related to the measured angle by:
= 45 + (4)
Reflectance/Brewsters Angle
Consider unpolarized light incident on a surface separating air and glass or air and water.
Define the plane of incidence, containing the incident, reflected and refracted rays as well as the
normal to the surface.
When light is reflected from a flat surface, the reflected light is partially polarized. This
is due to the fact that the reflectance of light R = (Reflected Intensity)/(Incident Intensity)
depends on the polarization itself. The degree of polarization depends on the angle of incidence
and the indices of refraction of the two media.
For reflection at an air-glass interface (indices of refraction n1 for air and n2 for glass), Fresnel
equations give the reflection coefficients rk , r :
n1 cos 1 n2 cos 2
r = (5a)
n1 cos 1 + n2 cos 2
n1 cos 2 n2 cos 1
rk = (5b)
n1 cos 2 + n2 cos 1
Note that 2 is not measured in this experiment and must be inferred from Snells law of
refraction:
sin 2 n1
= (6)
sin 1 n2
Figure 3 shows initially unpolarized light incident at the polarizing angle p , for which the
reflected light is completely polarized with its electric field vector perpendicular to the plane of
incidence. The electric field vector E of the incident wave can be resolved into two components:
parallel to the plane of incidence and perpendicular to the plane of incidence.
Note that Rk = 0 when n1 cos 1 = n2 cos 2 , which leads to the definition of the Brewster
3
angle (or polarizing angle):
n2
tan p = (7)
n1
Here p is the angle of incidence of unpolarized light which makes the reflected light completely
polarized in the perpendicular direction to the plane of incidence (Sir David Brewster, 1812).
When the angle of incidence of the initially unpolarized light is p , the reflected and refracted
rays are perpendicular to each other.
Note: If the incident light has no component of E perpendicular to the plane of incidence,
there is no reflected light.
4
Figure 4: Experiment Components.
To open up the software necessary for this part of the experiment, click on the desktop
shortcut Polarization of Light. Click on the little arrow located in the upper left corner of the
screen to start the acquisition. The program is self-explanatory.
Analysis
Students not from PHY224/324: Export data, analyze dependencies: Intensity vs. cos ,
and Intensity vs. cos2
PHY224/324 students: Python Requirement 1: write a fitting program for Intensity vs.
5
cos2 . You have to include experimental errors for both light intensity and angle readings. The
data set includes about 300 values (Intensity, ). Compare with Malus Law prediction, Eq. 1.
Figure 5: Experiment components for the three polarizer part of the experiment.
Select your data from 2 polarizers and from 3 polarizers. What two things are different for
the Intensity vs. Angle graph for 3 polarizers compared to 2 polarizers?
Export data and find the best fit matching Equation (3). Include experimental errors.
Python Requirement 2 (PHY224/324 students only): write a fitting program using your
data and the intensity function from Equation 3.
Questions
- For 3 polarizers, what is the angle between the middle polarizer and the first polarizer to get
the maximum transmission through all 3 polarizers? Remember: in the experiment, the angle
of the middle polarizer automatically reads zero when you start taking data but that doesnt
mean the middle polarizer is aligned with the first polarizer
- For 3 polarizers, what is the angle between the middle polarizer and the first polarizer to get
the minimum transmission through all 3 polarizers?
6
at which the light intensity is a minimum. This is Brewsters Angle, which is used to calculate
the index of refraction of acrylic (Eq. 7).
You will use this apparatus to measure the intensity of parallel and perpendicular polarization
components of refrected light at a range of incident angles. The preliminary setup include:
- Move the diode laser to the optics bench marked Brewsters angle,
- Attach 2 polarizers to the same holder, and place the collimating slits on the track as shown in
Figure 6. Make sure the rotary motion sensor is mounted on the spectrophotometer table with
the bigger diameter of spindle against the table (see Figure 6).
Figure 6: Complete setup for Exercise 3. Note that the computer interface is different in your
experiment.
7
Figure 7: The analyzing segment of the setup.
Note about reflection angle measurements: The angle is calculated by dividing the actual angle
(recorded by the computer) by two, with a correction with respect to the spindle diameter. The
markings on Brewsters disk are there only for convenience (in this experiment) and are not
used directly. To get the laser beam exactly on to the slit, you must make fine adjustments while
watching the digits display on computer for the maximum light intensity. You can adjust either
the Brewsters disk or the spectrophotometer arm until the intensity is maximized.
Analysis
- Plot Ik and I versus angle. Include uncertainties in reading intensity and angle. Determine
the Brewsters angle.
8
- Use Brewsters angle to calculate the index of refraction of acrylic using Equation 7. Use
n1 = 1.
- Calculate the parallel and perpendicular reflectances using Fresnel equations (5a and 5b).
Python Requirement 3 (PHY224/324 students only): do the three analysis steps above by
writing a program to fit the data and to output Brewsters angle, index of refraction of acrylic
and the two reflectances from (5a) and (5b).
Questions
1. Would Brewsters angle be more or less for light in air reflecting off water?
2. How would data look like for an arrangement with vertical square polarizer?
3. How do polarized sunglasses reduce glare? Which direction is the axis of polarization in a
pair of polarized sunglasses? How could you check this?
References
1. Halliday/Resnick/Walker Fundamentals of Physics, Chapter 33, 7th ed. Wiley 2005
Revised by Ruxandra Serbanescu in 2017 with notes from Kyle Manchee. The acquisition
DAQ board was built and programmed by Larry Avramidis.