Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2K views

    Chapter 3 Methodology

    Uploaded by

    Marianne Hershey Menor
    This study used a questionnaire-based survey of 20 BSIT-1B students at Cavite State University – Cavite City Campus in April 2017. A 100% response rate was achieved. The collected data was organized, analyzed, tabulated and interpreted using simple statistical methods. Responses were rated on a Likert scale of 1 to 4. The mean and overall mean were calculated to analyze the validity of responses, with the mean computed using the sum of the frequencies multiplied by the numerical ratings divided by the number of respondents.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Chapter 3 Methodology

    Uploaded by

    Marianne Hershey Menor
    2K views3 pages
    This study used a questionnaire-based survey of 20 BSIT-1B students at Cavite State University – Cavite City Campus in April 2017. A 100% response rate was achieved. The collected data was organized, analyzed, tabulated and interpreted using simple statistical methods. Responses were rated on a Likert scale of 1 to 4. The mean and overall mean were calculated to analyze the validity of responses, with the mean computed using the sum of the frequencies multiplied by the numerical ratings divided by the number of respondents.

    Original Description:

    Thesis Methodology

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This study used a questionnaire-based survey of 20 BSIT-1B students at Cavite State University – Cavite City Campus in April 2017. A 100% response rate was achieved. The collected data was organized, analyzed, tabulated and interpreted using simple statistical methods. Responses were rated on a Likert scale of 1 to 4. The mean and overall mean were calculated to analyze the validity of responses, with the mean computed using the sum of the frequencies multiplied by the numerical ratings divided by the number of respondents.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    2K views3 pages

    Chapter 3 Methodology

    Uploaded by

    Marianne Hershey Menor
    This study used a questionnaire-based survey of 20 BSIT-1B students at Cavite State University – Cavite City Campus in April 2017. A 100% response rate was achieved. The collected data was organized, analyzed, tabulated and interpreted using simple statistical methods. Responses were rated on a Likert scale of 1 to 4. The mean and overall mean were calculated to analyze the validity of responses, with the mean computed using the sum of the frequencies multiplied by the numerical ratings divided by the number of respondents.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    METHODOLOGY

    This study used questionnaire used a questionnaire based survey methods. 20

    questionnaires were prepared and distributed to the BSIT-1B students of Cavite State University

    Cavite City Campus in the month of April 2017. Filled questionnaire received from 20

    respondents .i.e. 100% of target students. While distributing questionnaires attention was paid to

    ensure the BSIT-1B students were represent adequately in the students. For this purpose BSIT-

    1B students of Cavite State University Cavite City Campus are also interviewed. Data

    collected through the questionnaires was organized, analyzed, tabulated and interpreted by using

    simple statistical method.

    Evaluation Procedure

    The steps done during the evaluation were: 1.) questionnaires were distributed to 1

    librarian and 19 students of BSIT-1B of Cavite State University Cavite City Campus; 2.) The

    survey forms had been distributed to the evaluators. Moreover, the directions and objectives had

    been explained by the researchers to the evaluators.

    1. The respondents have rated the survey based on Likerts Scale as shown in Table 1.

    Table 1. Likerts Scale


    Numerical Scale Descriptive Rating

    4 Strongly Agree

    3 Agree

    2 Disagree

    1 Strongly Disagree
    Table 1 shows the Likert Scale. It is a psychometric scale commonly used in research that

    employs questionnaires. It is mostly used in interpreting the responses from a survey research.

    2. The collected data were tabulated and the mean score for each criterion and the overall

    mean of the criteria has been computed.

    3. The results had been interpreted for the equivalent descriptive rating using the Likerts

    Scale Descriptive Rating for Interpreting the Evaluation Result as shown in Table 2.

    Table 2. Likerts Scale Descriptive Rating for Interpreting the Evaluation Result
    Numerical Rating Verbal Interpretation

    3.56 4.00 Strongly Agree

    2.56 3.55 Agree

    1.56 2.55 Disagree

    1.00 1.55 Strongly Disagree

    Statistical Treatment of Data

    After the evaluation, responses were tallied and analyzed. The mean and overall mean

    were used to describe the validity of the responses of the evaluators.

    The mean was computed using the following formula:


    = where: = mean

    = summation of

    f = frequency

    x = numerical rating

    n = number of respondents
    Meanwhile, the overall mean used the following formula:


    = where: = overall mean

    = summation of

    = mean (for each criterion)

    n = number of questions in survey

    You might also like