stcw7 Circ24 Rev1

E
4 ALBERT EMBANKMENT
LONDON SE1 7SR
Telephone: +44 (0)20 7735 7611 Fax: +44 (0)20 7587 3210
STCW.7/Circ.24/Rev.1
16 June 2017
INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON STANDARDS OF TRAINING, CERTIFICATION AND

WATCHKEEPING FOR SEAFARERS (STCW), 1978, AS AMENDED
Guidance for Parties, Administrations, port State control authorities, recognized

organizations and other relevant parties on the requirements of the STCW
Convention, 1978, as amended
1 The Sub-Committee on Human Element, Training and Watchkeeping, at its

fourth session (30 January to 3 February 2017), noted the urgent need for some clarification
on the implementation of the 2010 Manila Amendments to the International Convention on
Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW), 1978, as
amended.
2 The Sub-Committee also noted that:
.1 problems associated with requests for documentation during inspections or

surveys that is not required by the STCW Convention, 1978, as amended,
were resulting in significant and unnecessary administrative burdens on
Administrations, companies and seafarers. It was further noted that some
problems were linked to inconsistencies in interpretations regarding the
status of IMO model courses;
.2 references to the STCW Convention, 1978, as amended, were made in

varied ways within certificates and documentary evidence;
.3 there were reported misinterpretations of the training and familiarization

provisions for Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems (ECDIS) as
required by the STCW Convention, 1978, as amended; and
.4 the 2010 Manila Amendments to the STCW Convention and STCW Code
introduced four new certificates as set out in regulation II/5 (able seafarer
deck), III/5 (able seafarer engine), III/6 (electro-technical officers) and III/7
(electro-technical ratings), and that misinterpretation of the applicable
provisions had been reported.
3 To assist all concerned, the Sub-Committee prepared clarifications on a number of

issues in the Guidance, as set out in the annex.
I:\CIRC\STCW\07\STCW.7-CIRC.24-REV.1.docx
Page 2
4 Member States are invited to be guided accordingly and to bring this Guidance to the
attention of all concerned, in particular, port State control officers, recognized organizations,
companies and other relevant parties.
5 The content of this circular takes account of the guidance in MSC.1/Circ.1030 and
MSC.1/Circ.1032.
6 This circular revokes MSC.1/Circ.1030 and MSC.1/Circ.1032.
***
Annex, page 1
ANNEX
GUIDANCE FOR PARTIES, ADMINISTRATIONS, PORT STATE CONTROL

AUTHORITIES, RECOGNIZED ORGANIZATIONS AND OTHER RELEVANT PARTIES
ON THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STCW CONVENTION, 1978, AS AMENDED
Provision of documentation for verification
1 Under regulation I/2 of the STCW Convention, 1978, as amended, the documentation
authorizing the holder to serve in certain functions on board ship are certificates of competency
and certificates of proficiency and, only with regard to regulation V/2, documentary evidence.
The list of certificates or documentary evidence required under the STCW Convention, 1978,
as amended, is set out in table B-I/2 of the STCW Code.
2 Certificates of competency, certificates of proficiency and documentary evidence

issued in accordance with chapters II, III, IV, V, VI and VII of the STCW Convention, 1978, as
amended, are evidence of having successfully completed all required training and that the
required standard of competence has been achieved.
3 While IMO model courses may assist with the development of training programmes,
they are not mandatory, and Administrations are not required to use them when preparing and
approving training courses to meet the objectives of the STCW Code, as amended.
4 The validation of an IMO model course means that no reason was found to object to
its contents. It does not mean that it is an official interpretation of the Convention, or that
approval was granted by the IMO bodies.
5 It is agreed that:
.1 in accordance with regulation I/4 of the STCW Convention, 1978, as

amended, seafarers should not be required to provide documentation for
verification that is not required by the Convention; and
.2 certificates or documentary evidence issued under the STCW

Convention, 1978, as amended, should not be required to contain reference
to IMO model courses.
References to the STCW Convention, 1978, as amended
6 The normal practice within IMO is to refer to international conventions by an acronym

of the title of the convention and the date on which it was made (e.g. SOLAS 1974). Where
amendments are made to the original convention, the title is then amended to reflect the
amendments (e.g. SOLAS 1974, as amended) but it is not normal practice to append the
year/dates of the amendments to the title of the amended convention.
7 It has been reported that different references to the STCW Convention, 1978, as
amended, can be found in certificates and endorsements, which has led to some confusion.
In particular, if the references had different meanings, or if the differences were unintentional.
8 The format of certificates and endorsements provided in section A-I/2 of the

STCW Code refers to "the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and
Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978, as amended".
Annex, page 2
9 In order to avoid confusion, it is recommended that certificates and endorsements

referring to the STCW Convention use the reference "the International Convention on
Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978, as amended",
without appending the year/dates of the amendments.
10 It is important to note that seafarers may hold certificates and documentary evidence
that contain a different reference to the STCW Convention that remain valid and should be
accepted.
Training requirements for Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems (ECDIS)
and provision of the documentation for verification
11 The STCW Code contains requirements for approved training on ECDIS. In cases
where the approved training has not been completed, a limitation shall be included on the
certificate and endorsements issued to the seafarer. Where such a limitation is not specified,
the certificate and endorsements are evidence of having successfully completed the required
approved training and that the standard of competence has been achieved.
12 No requirement exists for the approved training on ECDIS equipment to be

type-specific. The knowledge, understanding and proficiency required to be demonstrated is
generalized to ensure seafarers have the necessary skills for basic operation of all types of
equipment.
13 In accordance with regulation I/14, companies are responsible for ensuring that
seafarers employed on their ships are familiarized with the installed equipment, including
ECDIS.
14 It is agreed that seafarers required to have training in the use of ECDIS:
.1 should not be required to provide documentation of training in ECDIS that is

specific to the installed equipment; and
.2 are required to be familiarized with the ECDIS equipment installed on board.
Regulations II/5 (able seafarer deck), III/5 (able seafarer engine), III/6 (electro-technical
officers) and III/7 (electro-technical ratings)
15 Misinterpretation of the applicable provision of regulations II/5, III/5, III/6 and III/7 has
been reported. In particular, port State control officers have required personnel on board to
possess applicable Certificate of Competency or Certificate of Proficiency, when such
personnel are not included in the Minimum Safe Manning Document (MSMD) of the ship.
16 Port State control officers, recognized organizations and other relevant parties are
reminded that under paragraph 2.1 of appendix 11 of the Procedures for port State
control, 2011 (resolution A.1052(27)), "If a ship is manned in accordance with a MSMD or
equivalent document issued by the flag State, the port State control officers should accept that
the ship is safely manned".
___________

stcw7 Circ24 Rev1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

stcw7 Circ24 Rev1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

stcw7 Circ24 Rev1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

E

INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON STANDARDS OF TRAINING, CERTIFICATION AND

Guidance for Parties, Administrations, port State control authorities, recognized

1 The Sub-Committee on Human Element, Training and Watchkeeping, at its

2 The Sub-Committee also noted that:

.1 problems associated with requests for documentation during inspections or

.2 references to the STCW Convention, 1978, as amended, were made in

.3 there were reported misinterpretations of the training and familiarization

3 To assist all concerned, the Sub-Committee prepared clarifications on a number of

6 This circular revokes MSC.1/Circ.1030 and MSC.1/Circ.1032.

GUIDANCE FOR PARTIES, ADMINISTRATIONS, PORT STATE CONTROL

Provision of documentation for verification

2 Certificates of competency, certificates of proficiency and documentary evidence

.1 in accordance with regulation I/4 of the STCW Convention, 1978, as

.2 certificates or documentary evidence issued under the STCW

References to the STCW Convention, 1978, as amended

6 The normal practice within IMO is to refer to international conventions by an acronym

8 The format of certificates and endorsements provided in section A-I/2 of the

9 In order to avoid confusion, it is recommended that certificates and endorsements

12 No requirement exists for the approved training on ECDIS equipment to be

14 It is agreed that seafarers required to have training in the use of ECDIS:

.1 should not be required to provide documentation of training in ECDIS that is

.2 are required to be familiarized with the ECDIS equipment installed on board.

You might also like