Sand Casting Least Expensive in small quantities (less Dimensional accuracy inferior to other Use when strength/weight ratio permits than 100) processes, requires larger tolerances Tolerances, surface finish and low machining Ferrous and non - ferrous metals may Castings usually exceed calculated weight cost does not warrant a more expensive be cast process Surface finish of ferrous castings usually Possible to cast very large parts. exceeds 125 RMS Least expensive tooling Permanent and Semi-permanent Mold Casting Less expensive than Investment or Die Only non-ferrous metals may be cast by Use when process recommended for parts Castings this process subjected to hydrostatic pressure
Dimensional Tolerances closer than Less competitive with Sand Cast process Ideal for parts having low profile, no cores and Sand Castings when three or more sand cores are quantities in excess of 300 required Castings are dense and pressure tight Higher tooling cost than Sand Cast Plaster Cast Smooth "As Cast" finish (25 RMS) More costly than Sand or Permanent Use when parts require smooth "As Cast" Mold-Casting surface finish and closer tolerances than Closer dimensional tolerance than Sand possible with Sand or Permanent Mold Cast Limited number of sources Processes
Intricate shapes and fine details Requires minimum of 1 deg. draft including thinner "As Cast" walls are possible
Large parts cost less to cast than by Investment process Investment Cast Close dimensional tolerance Costs are higher than Sand, Permanent Use when Complexity precludes use of Sand or Mold or Plaster process Castings Permanent Mold Castings Complex shape, fine detail, intricate core sections and thin walls are possible The process cost is justified through savings in machining or brazing Ferrous and non-ferrous metals may be cast Weight savings justifies increased cost
As-Cast" finish (64 - 125 RMS) Die Casting Good dimensional tolerances are Economical only in very large quantities Use when quantity of parts justifies the high possible due to high tool cost tooling cost
Excellent part-part dimensional Not recommended for hydrostatic Parts are not structural and are subjected to consistency pressure applications hydrostatic pressure
Parts require a minimal post machining For Castings where penetrant (die) or radiographic inspection are not required.
Difficult to guarantee minimum mechanical properties