Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

State Banks' Staff Union: Ufbu Condemns Nayak Panel Report - Demands Rejection of Report

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Telegrams: GUARDIAN Fax: 091-044 - 2524 35 24

Telephone: 2522 07 31
2522 71 79

State Banks Staff Union


(CHENNAI CIRCLE)
(Regd. No: 883)
(Affiliated to All India State Bank of India Staff Federation)

POST BOX NO.1754


STATE BANK BUILDINGS
84, RAJAJI SALAI
CHENNAI 600 001.

CIRCULAR NO.43 29TH MAY 2014


UFBU CONDEMNS NAYAK PANEL REPORT -
DEMANDS REJECTION OF REPORT

We reproduce hereunder the text of the Circular No.88 dated 28.05.2014 issued by
Com. M.V.Murali, General Secretary of our National Organisation, NCBE appending the
Circular No.UFBU/2014/23 dated 28.05.2014, the contents of which are self-explanatory.

(C.M.BASKARAN)
GENERAL SECRETARY
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEXT OF THE UFBU CIRCULAR NO.UFBU/2014/23 DATED 28TH MAY 2014:
We, the United Forum of Bank Unions (UFBU), the umbrella forum of all workmen unions and
officers associations in the industry, representing 10 lac bank employees and officers, are shocked
to observe the retrograde recommendations of the P J Nayak Committee, which was appointed by
RBI to Review Governance of Boards of Banks in India.

We strongly condemn the retrograde recommendations of the Nayak Panel as they are detrimental
to the interests of general public and the nation on the whole and demand for unequivocal rejection
of the said Report for the reasons as under:

The report contains only one-sided analysis as majority of the members on the Nayak
Committee belongs to private bank/organisations and due representation to Public
Sector bodies is not given;

A deliberate attempt against public sector system is visible as no cognizance is given


to the benefits derived out of Nationalisation of Banks towards the economic growth
and the prosperity of the country since nationalization in 1969.

02. It is a known fact that in the year 1969, a major decision was taken by the then Prime
Minister, Late Smt. Indira Gandhi to nationalize major banks in order to expand bank credit to priority
areas, which were neglected till then.

03. The objectives of nationalization of commercial banks can be attributed mainly towards
Social Welfare, Control of Private Monopolies, Expansion of Banking, Reduction of Regional
Imbalances, Priority Sector Lending and for Development of banking habit. More particularly to
ensure that the major financial resource of the Country mobilized through public savings/deposits is
at the disposal of the Government but not in the hands of a few industrialists/Corporate houses.

04. There is no denying fact that banks have done good work in socio-economic transformation
and until 1990s, the nationalised banks grew at a pace of around 4%, closer to the average growth
rate of the Indian economy. It is to be noted that the deposits in Public Sector Banks have
increased due to increasing confidence of public that their funds are safe and secured.

2
..Page 2..

05. It will not be out of context to mention here that the UFBU is strongly opposed to the reform
measures in the financial sector as it is detrimental to the interests of the Nation on the whole.

06. It is quite unfortunate that the insulation provided to the economy of the Country by the
regulatory system of Public Sector Banks during the economic recession in 2008 is completely
forgotten and once again attempts are being made to privatise the Public Sector Banks.

07. We strongly oppose the following retrograde recommendations, among others of P J Nayak
Committee:

a. The Committee insists on capital requirement quoting that the capital of public sector
banks has significantly eroded with the proportion of stressed assets rising rapidly,
without proper assessment of reasons and individuals/ organisations behind the
increased stressed Assets/NPAs and consequential erosion in capital, and recommends
that the public sector banks be brought under the control of those defaulters, who are
responsible for erosion in capital of public sector banks;

b. The Committee recommends for radical reform measures, which would bring back the
pre-nationalisation concept of class-banking;

c. The committee proposes that the Government shall distance itself from several bank
governance functions which it presently discharges and recommends that the Bank
Nationalisation Acts of 1970 and 1980 together with SBI Act and the SBI (Subsidiary
Banks) Act be repealed, means privatizing all the Public Sector Banks, which will pave
way for spread of the monopoly enterprise. Further, Banks collect savings from the
general public and if it is in the hands of private sector, the national interests may be
neglected. The nationalization of banks ensured the availability of resources to the
priority sectors. Besides, nationalized banks command more confidence of the customers
about the safety of their deposits.

d. The committee opines that difficulties in public sector banks arise from several externally
imposed constraints and suggests for reduction of Government stake to less than 50 per
cent and raising the limit of investors voting rights to 26 per cent from the existing
10 per cent to pave way for private control, neglecting the fact that India aims at socialism
and this objective can only be achieved with the financial institutions under the control of
Government and especially through nationalization. Rather, to control externally imposed
constraints, there are ways and means to ensure more autonomy to Public Sector Banks
not necessarily by reduction of the Government stake.

08. The report of the P J Nayak Committee recommendations aimed at privatization of public
sector banks, merger of banks, more flexible bank licensing policy, etc. which would benefit only the
private players and in no way would be beneficial to the common general public and the Nation on
the whole. The report of the Nayak Committee is biased, anti-public, anti-national and pro-
imperialistic and hence we demand for outright rejection of the P J Nayak Committee Report on
Review of Governance of Boards of Banks in India in toto and provide justice and support to the
Government initiatives in Financial Inclusion by spreading the bank services to every nook and
corner of the Country.

We hope for your positive response in the matter.

With best regards,

Sd/-
(M.V.MURALI)
CONVENOR

SBSU (CC) ::: AISBISF : : : NCBE ::: UFBU ZINDABAD

You might also like