Data Collection Methods
Data Collection Methods
Inaccurate data
collection can impact the results of a study and ultimately lead to invalid results.
Data collection methods for impact evaluation vary along a continuum. At the one end
of this continuum are quantatative methods and at the other end of the continuum are
Qualitative methods for data collection .
(http://www.worldbank.org/poverty/impact/methods/datacoll.htm )
Quantitative research is concerned with testing hypotheses derived from theory and/or
being able to estimate the size of a phenomenon of interest. Depending on the
research question, participants may be randomly assigned to different treatments. If
this is not feasible, the researcher may collect data on participant and situational
characteristics in order to statistically control for their influence on the dependent, or
outcome, variable. If the intent is to generalize from the research participants to a
larger population, the researcher will employ probability sampling to select
participants.
Experiments/clinical trials.
Observing and recording well-defined events (e.g., counting the number of
patients waiting in emergency at specified times of the day).
Obtaining relevant data from management information systems.
Administering surveys with closed-ended questions (e.g., face-to face and
telephone interviews, questionnaires etc).
(http://www.achrn.org/quantitative_methods.htm)
Interviews
Face -to -face interviews have a distinct advantage of enabling the researcher to
establish rapport with potential partiocipants and therefor gain their cooperation.These
interviews yield highest response rates in survey research.They also allow the
researcher to clarify ambiguous answers and when appropriate, seek follow-up
information. Disadvantages include impractical when large samples are involved time
consuming and expensive.(Leedy and Ormrod, 2001)
Telephone interviews are less time consuming and less expensive and the researcher
has ready access to anyone on the planet who hasa telephone.Disadvantages are that
the response rate is not as high as the face-to- face interview but cosiderably higher
than the mailed questionnaire.The sample may be biased to the extent that people
without phones are part of the population about whom the researcher wants to draw
inferences.
Questionnaires
Web based questionnaires : A new and inevitably growing methodology is the use of
Internet based research. This would mean receiving an e-mail on which you would
click on an address that would take you to a secure web-site to fill in a questionnaire.
This type of research is often quicker and less detailed.Some disadvantages of this
method include the exclusion of people who do not have a computer or are unable to
access a computer.Also the validity of such surveys are in question as people might be
in a hurry to complete it and so might not give accurate responses.
(http://www.statcan.ca/english/edu/power/ch2/methods/methods.htm)
Questionnaires often make use of Checklist and rating scales.These devices help
simplify and quantify people's behaviors and attitudes.A checklistis a list of
behaviors,characteristics,or other entities that te researcher is looking for.Either the
researcher or survey participant simply checks whether each item on the list is
observed, present or true or vice versa.A rating scale is more useful when a behavior
needs to be evaluated on a continuum.They are also known as Likert scales. (Leedy
and Ormrod, 2001)
they tend to be open-ended and have less structured protocols (i.e., researchers
may change the data collection strategy by adding, refining, or dropping
techniques or informants)
they rely more heavily on iteractive interviews; respondents may be
interviewed several times to follow up on a particular issue, clarify concepts or
check the reliability of data
they use triangulation to increase the credibility of their findings (i.e.,
researchers rely on multiple data collection methods to check the authenticity
of their results)
generally their findings are not generalizable to any specific population, rather
each case study produces a single piece of evidence that can be used to seek
general patterns among different studies of the same issue
The qualitative methods most commonly used in evaluation can be classified in three
broad categories:
indepth interview
observation methods
document review
The following link provides more information on the above three methods.
Different ways of collecting evaluation data are useful for different purposes, and each
has advantages and disadvantages. Various factors will influence your choice of a data
collection method: the questions you want to investigate, resources available to you,
your timeline, and more