Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Additional Cases On Selected Maxims of Equity

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Additonal case on selected Maxims of Equity

1. He who seeks Equity must do equiity


See Wong Chun Wah v Kok Kam Chee [2008] 3 MLJ 176

2. He who seeks Equity must come with clean hands


Leo Leslie Armstrong v Jawatan Kkuasa Kerja Tanah Wilayah Persekutuan,
KL [2014] 1 LNS 748
Sarjan Singh v Sadara Ali [1960 1 MLJ 52
Eastern Properties Sdn Bhd v Hampstead Corporation Sdn Bhd [2007] 6 CLJ
538
Timber Master Complex (Sabah) Sdn Bhd v Top Origin Sdn Bhd {2002] 1
MLJ 33
Clean hands
Multitech Intelligent Homes v Homes Sdn Bhd {2010} MLJU 1845
Adrik bin Mohd Ramli v Woo Swee Mee [2010] 9 MLJ 717
Paruvathy v Krishnan Doraisamy [1983} 2 MLJ 121

3. Where there is equity the law shall prevail


Quah Hong Lian Neo v Seow Teong Teck & Ors [1936] MLJ 203

4. Delay Defeats Equity


Tengku Ismail Tengku Sulaiman v Sin Cheng Soon {2006} 3 CLJ 556.
M. Ratnaval v S Lourenardin [1988} 2 MLJ 371

5. Equality is Equity
Malayan Credit Ltd v Javk Chia MPH Ltd [1986] AC 549
Chung Kiaw Bank Bhd v Gvt of Sabah {1993] MLJU 136
Chee Kok Choon v Sern Kuang Eng [2005] 4 NLJ 461 cf. Chua Kum Fatt v Lim
Lay Choo {1993 3 SLR 833
Wong Kim Foong v Teau Ah Kau [1998] 1 MLJ 359
Shudesh Kumar v Kamlesh [2005] 5 MLJ 82

6. Equity looks to the itent rather than the form


Yeoh Poh Hong v Ng Cheung On [2010] MLJU 1077
Quah Eng Hock v Ang Hooi Kiam [2005] 5 CLJ 126
Teoh Heng Seng [2001] 1 CLJ 598

7. Equity looks as done that which ought to be done


Margret Chua v Ho Swee Kiew [1961] 1 MLJ 173
Sinar Wong v Ng Kee Seng [2005] 2 MLJ 42

You might also like