Clinical Evaluation and Investigation of Neuropathy: Hugh J Willison, John B Winer
Clinical Evaluation and Investigation of Neuropathy: Hugh J Willison, John B Winer
Clinical Evaluation and Investigation of Neuropathy: Hugh J Willison, John B Winer
com
T
he assessment and investigation of a possible neuropathy is one of the most common clinical
problems facing the general neurologist. Studies of the prevalence of neuropathy in the com-
munity are rare but suggest a figure of between 28%,1 making peripheral neuropathy at least
as common as stroke. Despite this high prevalence of neuropathy, it is only a small proportion of
patients with neuropathies who are referred for detailed evaluation, principally those individuals
with disabling disease, or with none of the obvious risk factors such as diabetes or alcoholism.
A logical approach to the assessment of such patients is essential and can be organised into a
number of basic questions. The neurologist faced with a patient with a neuropathy has to deal with
literally thousands of possible causes, many extremely uncommon, and these can only be simpli-
fied by defining the neuropathy by other features that lead to the select few of most likely
diagnoses. This is in part a process of pattern recognition but can be helped by a stepwise approach.
Several algorithms2 and review articles3 have been published to aid this process and a typical one
has been constructed here (fig 1).
The approach adopted in this article is to present the evaluation as a list of commonly asked
questions that, if correctly addressed and answered, are likely to yield diagnostically important
information, and hence direct appropriate management. This is not intended as an exhaustive
account of neuropathy but is a personal view, illustrative of a diagnostic process that is commonly
adopted.
This question can usually be answered easily, but occasionally patients may present unusually, and
multiple pathologies may confound the diagnostic process. Spinal cord disease is one of the most
common differential diagnostic considerations in patients with neuropathic-type symptoms (box
1). Where sensory symptoms are present with few clinical signs, the classical features of a lower
motor neurone disorder may be absent and a transverse myelitis, myelopathy, or other central
nervous system disorder can masquerade as a neuropathy. Involvement of cranial nerves (for
example, facial numbness or weakness, oculomotor disturbance) in an acute inflammatory
neuropathy is helpful in excluding a cord lesion with a pseudo-lower motor neurone pattern of
presentation, as may occur in acute myelopathies.
A common co-occurrence, particularly in the elderly, is the combined presence of cervical
spondylotic myelopathy and late onset predominantly sensory axonal neuropathy. In the same
context, spondylotic radiculopathies may co-occur with upper limb entrapment neuropathies. In
these circumstances, experience and care is required to identify the dominant pathological process,
and this may not always be possible. Certain neuropathies co-exist with CNS disease, such as vita-
min B12 deficiency, adrenomyeloneuropathy, neuroacanthocytosis, spinocerebellar syndromes, to
name but a few of many. In these situations there is no substitute for pattern recognition and, if
this fails, a structured approach, both of which are more likely to succeed than random investiga-
tion.
www.jnnp.com
Downloaded from http://jnnp.bmj.com/ on December 5, 2017 - Published by group.bmj.com
NEUROLOGY IN PRACTICE
*
ii4
c
c
Conus tumour
Carcinoma prostate
neuropathy (CIDP)
paraproteinemia related
amiodarone toxicity
Refsums disease
this cannot be clarified at presentation but becomes evident Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) types 1, X and AR CMT 1
later. Guillain-Barr syndrome (GBS), for example, by defini- metachromatic leucodystrophy
tion reaches its nadir within four weeks of onset, and any pro- statins
gression beyond this may suggest relapsing disease or
evolution into chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyra-
diculoneuropathy (CIDP), both of which would require even to peripheral nerve, but they do give an indication of fibre
further treatment. A frequent difficulty in the history is type involvement, and hence narrow down the likely causes.
encountered in separating residual deficit following an acute
event, from a chronic process. The time course helps to limit
the differential diagnosis, especially for acute and chronic HAVE I OBTAINED ADEQUATE PAST, FAMILY,
demyelinating syndromes (box 2). OCCUPATIONAL, AND DRUG HISTORIES?
One often undervalued aspect of clinical history taking A very important consideration is to establish whether the
relates to the precise details of the site and character of neuropathy is an isolated illness of peripheral nerve, or
sensory symptoms. Detailed accounts of this are available whether it is occurring in the context of disease elsewhere, or
from many sources.4 Focal symptoms can provide vital clues to other historical factors. Important background clues and
individual nerve or root disorders, that in themselves may be information are often missed in the first round of assessment
sufficient to make a firm diagnosis of, for example, meralgia and only come to light retrospectively.
parasthetica. Distal dying back axonopathies have a very Concurrent systemic diseases are clearly important, particu-
characteristic length dependent pattern of symptom evolu- larly organ failure, endocrine disorders, and connective tissue
tion, that is usually symmetrical, affecting feet, then hands, disease. Diabetes, and latent diabetes, should always be
then anterior trunk. Demyelinating neuropathy may also have sought. The detailed family history is often crucial, even if
a length dependent pattern of sensory evolution because in a negative, provided that the family is of a sufficient size to be
diffuse process longer fibres have a higher probability of informative. This may include an opportunistic examination
becoming blocked. In contrast, multi-segmental patterns of of accompanying relatives, even if restricted to tapping the
sensory involvement, including the trunk, suggest dorsal root ankle jerks, or recording a lower limb motor conduction veloc-
ganglionopathies as may occur in the neuropathy of Sjogrens ity.
syndrome, for example. Toxic exposure in the workplace is becoming less prominent
Apart from the site of onset, the character of sensory symp- a risk factor as industrial environments improve. Thus lead,
toms needs to be pinned down from the history, as it is often arsenic, acrylamide, and volatile solvents are all rare as causes
poorly described by patients and can be diagnostically useful. of neuropathy. However, a drug history is crucial, both
Pain, loss of temperature appreciation, and autonomic symp- prescribed and recreational. The list of prescribed medications
toms are all features of selective small fibre involvement. The resulting in neuropathy is too long to list, major culprits being
negative sensory symptom of unsteadiness that is more amiodarone, phenytoin, statins, many antibiotics, and chemo-
prominent in the dark, or on eye closure, is characteristic of therapies: if in doubt, look it up in your BNF! Abused drugs
sensory ataxia caused by large fibre involvement. These provide a twofold risk: the drug itselffor example, tobacco
patterns of sensory involvement do not localise the lesion, (paraneoplastic), alcohol (toxic), cocaine (vasculitic)and
www.jnnp.com
Downloaded from http://jnnp.bmj.com/ on December 5, 2017 - Published by group.bmj.com
NEUROLOGY IN PRACTICE
*
suspecting a Scottish highlander of having leprosy, but he may
c Amyloid
have acquired neuroborreliosis locally, or have returned with it ii5
c Diabetes
from a walking tour of the Black Forest. The contrary applies c Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies
to an immigrant from India, leprosy being one of the most (HNPP A)
common causes of neuropathy worldwide. Vegans are vulner- c Vasculitis
able to nutritional deficiency; intrafamilial marriages throw c Multifocal motor neuropathy
up recessive neuropathies.
www.jnnp.com
Downloaded from http://jnnp.bmj.com/ on December 5, 2017 - Published by group.bmj.com
NEUROLOGY IN PRACTICE
*
ii6
leprosy
hereditary sensory neuropathies
c
c
c
Hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathies
Chronic idiopathic small fibre sensory neuropathy
Sjogrens syndrome
amyloid
uraemia
sarcoid
c Predominantly motor neuropathies duction velocities in several nerves, assessment of conduction
Guillain-Barre syndrome and CIDP block, measurement of sensory action potentials, and
porphyria measurement of distal latencies and F wave latencies, as
diphtheria described below.
botulism However, there are some clinical clues that can be helpful.
lead Widespread reflex loss, including in muscle groups that are
Charcot-Marie-Tooth not particularly weak or wasted, is more a feature of demyeli-
nation. In contrast, selective loss of the ankle jerks in the pres-
ence of distal wasting and weakness is more typical of an
affected to a greater extent than would be expected from the axonopathy, especially if accompanied by a stocking distribu-
degree of involvement in the legs. tion of sensory loss.
Thus the complete assessment of a patient with a
WHAT IS THE RELATIVE EXTENT OF MOTOR AND
neuropathy might characterise the clinical syndrome as a
SENSORY NERVE INVOLVEMENT?
chronic multifocal, predominantly motor, demyelinating neu-
It is clear that some neuropathy syndromes are purely motor,
such as multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block ropathy. This type of neuropathy would have a restricted
(MMNCB), whereas other are purely sensory, such as a differential diagnosis and would target investigations towards
subacute sensory neuronopathy (SSN) caused by paraneo- distinguishing CIDP from a paraproteinemia and amiodarone
plastic or other autoimmune dorsal root ganglionopathies toxicity.
(box 4). However, clinical life is rarely so simple and the The largest and most difficult group is the mixed motor
majority of neuropathies are mixed, if not symptomatically, sensory neuropathy with a pattern to suggest a dying back
then at least on clinical or electrophysiological examination. axonopathy and confirmation of an axonal neuropathy on
Even in MMNCB, some very minor sensory symptoms or signs electrophysiology (box 6). Here a careful history is paramount
(including electrophysiological) in motor affected territories with detailed enquiry into other systemic disease and a
are sometimes evident and should not exclude the diagnosis, detailed family tree. Constructing a family tree may bring out
although may encourage one to consider the closely related details of forgotten relatives with stigmata of an inherited
syndrome, multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and neuropathy such as high arched feet.
motor neuropathy (MADSAM, Lewis-Sumner syndrome). In
WHAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CAN I EXPECT
contrast sensory involvement should never be the case in
FROM A NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT?
motor nurone disease (MND), and would cast serious doubt Detailed consideration of this is outwith the scope of our
on this diagnosis. Similarly motor involvement should never introduction, but it is worth making a few points. The neuro-
occur in a pure dorsal root ganglionopathy; however, the neu- physiological examination cannot be conducted in isolation
ropathy associated with anti-Hu antibody is not as uniform an from the clinical assessment, but has to be led by the histori-
SSN as text books state in that motor involvement can often be cal and clinical findings. Many clinical electrophysiologists
found in this patient group.5 Thus this question is intended as take a history and perform an examination before their elec-
a helpful guideline to diagnosis rather than an immutable trophysiological studies in order to guide their choice of sites
rule. and testing methods, but this by necessity is often rather lim-
ited. It is therefore extremely helpful for the clinician to high-
IS THERE PROMINENT SMALL FIBRE AND
AUTONOMIC INVOLVEMENT? light the most pertinent questions sought from the laboratory,
Autonomic features, including pupillary, sweat gland, cardio- ideally by discussion or alternatively on the request form. In
vascular, and gastrointestinal involvement are features of dia- the latter case, the neurologist should succinctly specify the
betic and amyloid neuropathy, and can occasionally be promi- information required from the neurophysiological assessment
nent in GBS (box 5). This requires a careful history for of the patient, but should refrain from specifying the
symptoms of light intolerance, postural hypotension, noctur- individual tests required to achieve that!
nal diarrhoea, impaired sweating, and bladder dysfunction. Sensory studies are often the first approach to determining
Examination can include careful analysis of pupillary light the presence of a neuropathy. If objective sensory loss affecting
responses, lying and standing blood pressure measurement, large fibres is clinically evident, the presence of normally pre-
and assessment of sinus arrhythmia with ECG measurement served sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) points away
during deep breathing. from the cause being distal to the dorsal root ganglion, and
suggests a central or root disorder. Focal entrapments can
IS THE NEUROPATHY AXONAL OR DEMYELINATING often be readily picked up by side to side comparisons on sen-
ON CLINICAL GROUNDS? sory nerve examination. Length dependent large fibre
This cannot be determined clinically with any degree of accu- neuropathies are characterised by disappearance of distal leg
racy and requires neurophysiology with measurement of con- SNAPs (that is, superficial peroneal and sural nerve) before
www.jnnp.com
Downloaded from http://jnnp.bmj.com/ on December 5, 2017 - Published by group.bmj.com
NEUROLOGY IN PRACTICE
www.jnnp.com
Downloaded from http://jnnp.bmj.com/ on December 5, 2017 - Published by group.bmj.com
NEUROLOGY IN PRACTICE
where tests have increased dramatically is in dysimmune syn- with CIDP do not have inflammatory cells in their sensory
dromes, especially antibody testing. It is obligatory to diagnose nerves and biopsy is probably unnecessary in patients with
paraneoplastic syndromes by antibody testing in patients with typical electrophysiology and clinical features of CIDP.18 The
subacute sensory neuronopathies, and in practice the net is yield from biopsying chronic axonal neuropathies is very small
often cast wider than this clinical indication. A wide range of and is probably not justified when a vasculitis seems unlikely.
Patients with axonal neuropathy simulating an axonal form of
*
other antineuronal antibody tests are also available for specific
indications. CMT can occasionally turn out to have amyloid, especially if
ii8 there are small fibre features. The diagnosis in these patients
Anti-ganglioside antibodies are sought in patients with
suspected MMN. Anti-GM1 IgM antibodies are present in can frequently be made by looking for transthyretin mutations
around 50% of patients with this syndrome, so their absence in most patients without recourse to biopsy, but if the genetics
does not exclude the diagnosis, but their presence is diagnos- are unhelpful then a biopsy seems reasonable.
tically helpful.
.....................
Anti-GQ1b IgG antibodies are a highly reliable marker for
Authors affiliations
Miller Fisher syndrome where they are invariably present in H J Willison, Division of Clinical Neurosciences, Southern General
acute phase sera. In the motor axonal variant of GBS, Hospital, Glasgow, UK
J Winer, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Birmingham,
anti-GM1 and anti-GD1a antibodies are also frequently found, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
being present in over 50% of cases.
In chronic neuropathy syndromes, particularly those REFERENCES
associated with IgM paraproteins, antibodies to MAG, 1 Martyn CN, Hughes RA. Epidemiology of peripheral neuropathy. J Neurol
Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997;62:31018.
sulfatide, and GD1b ganglioside are sought since they define 2 Schaumburg HH, Berger AR, Thomas PK, Disorders of the peripheral
rather discrete clinical phenotypes. In none of these latter nerve. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 1992:2632.
3 Hughes R. Peripheral neuropathy. BMJ 2002;324:4669.
syndromes does the presence of antibody predict a good 4 Mendell JR, et al. Diagnosis and management of peripheral nerve
response to treatment. disorders. In: Contemporary neurology series. Oxford: Oxford University
Press. 2001:1029.
5 Hughes RAC, Antoine JC, Honnorat J, et al. Paraneoplastic peripheral
When should I do a nerve biopsy? neuropathy associated with ant-Hu antibodies. A clinical and
Sensory nerve biopsy has become established as a diagnostic electrophysiological study of 20 patients. Brain 2002;125:16675.
procedure for the investigation of certain types of neuropathy 6 Asbury AK, Cornblath DR. Assessment of current diagnostic criteria for
Guillain-Barre syndrome. Ann Neurol 1990;27(suppl):S214.
over the last 30 years.15 The advent of genetic tests for many 7 Ad Hoc Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology AIDS
neuropathies has reduced the need for biopsy, but it remains Task Force. Research criteria for the diagnosis of chronic inflammatory
demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Neurology
the primary method of establishing a diagnosis of vasculitic 1991;41:61718.
neuropathy when histology is not available from elsewhere. A 8 Fross RD, Daube JR. Neuropathy in the Miller Fisher syndrome: clinical
and electrophysiological findings. Neurology 1987;37:14938.
combined biopsy of nerve and muscle is usually advocated in 9 Olney RK, Aminoff MJ, So YT. Clinical and electrodiagnostic features of
cases of suspected vasculitis in order to increase the diagnos- X-linked recessive bulbospinal neuronopathy. Neurology 1991;4:8238.
10 Kiers L, et al. Quantitative studies of F responses in Guillain-Barre
tic yield.16 These biopsies usually involve the superficial syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.
peroneal or intermediate lateral nerves which allow access to Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology 1994;93:25564.
muscle within the same incision. Since most vasculitic lesions 11 Chaudhary V, Corse AM, Cornblath DR, et al. Multifocal motor
neuropathy: electrodiagnostic features. Muscle and Nerve
occur in the epineurium a full thickness biopsy is generally 1994;17:198205.
preferred.17 The value of nerve biopsy has been addressed by a 12 Notermans NC, Wokke JH, Fransen H, et al. Chronic idiopathic
polyneuropathy presenting in middle or old age: a clinical and
prospective study from Guys Hospital. In this consecutive electrophysiological study of 75 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
series of 50 sural nerve biopsies, management was altered in 1993;56:106671.
13 Graus F, Bonaventura I, Uchuya M, et al. Indolent anti-Hu associated
60% and the diagnosis altered in 14% of cases. Such biopsies paraneoplastic sensory neuropathy. Neurology 1994;44:225861.
were considered to cause persistent pain at the biopsy site in 14 Reilly MM, Hanna MG. Genetic neuromuscular disease. J Neurol
as many as 33% of patients. This latter finding emphasises the Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;73(suppl II):ii1221.
15 Dyck PJ, et al. Methods of fascicular biopsy of human peripheral nerve for
need to restrict biopsy to carefully selected cases and ideally electrophysioogical and histological study. Mayo Clin Proc 1966;41:778.
reserved for centres with expertise in the techniques involved. 16 Said G, Lacroix-Ciaudo C, Fujimura H, et al. The peripheral neuropathy of
necrotizing arteritis: a clinicopathological study. Ann Neurol
Nerve biopsies can be helpful in the diagnosis of CIDP 1988;23:4615.
where histological identification of inflammatory cells or 17 Said G. Value of nerve biopsy? Lancet 2001;357:122021.
18 Molenaar DS, Vermeulen M, de Haan R. Diagnostic value of sural nerve
frank macrophage mediated demyelination on electron biopsy in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. J Neurol
microscopy can be diagnostic. Unfortunately many patients Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;64:849.
www.jnnp.com
Downloaded from http://jnnp.bmj.com/ on December 5, 2017 - Published by group.bmj.com
These include:
References This article cites 15 articles, 8 of which you can access for free at:
http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/74/suppl_2/ii3#BIBL
Email alerting Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up in the
service box at the top right corner of the online article.
Notes