Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

CCI Radome Whitepaper 190813

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9

│ www.fastcomposites.

ca │

Radome R&D White Paper

Prepared by
Competition Composites Inc. (CCI)
168 Wescar Lane
Carp, Ontario
Canada K0A 1L0

August 2013
│ www.fastcomposites.ca │

Introduction
Radomes, are used to enclose antennas. The main function of a radome is to provide protection
for the enclosed equipment (antenna and other electronics). This improves system availability
since the antenna is not affected by winds, rain or ice. It also provides a stable environment for
service personnel from harsh weather conditions. The benefits are reduced structural
requirements, reduced fabrication, installation and maintenance costs.

Uses vary from large terrestrial installations, tower mounted conical shrouds vehicle mounted and
aviation installations. Typical applications include antennas for radar, telemetry, tracking,
communications, surveillance, and radio astronomy.

Potential customers may include the satellite, broadcast, communications, radar, weather and
cable industries, defense and government agencies worldwide. This report will concentrate mostly
on Land based terrestrial radomes.

The Radome Market


The radome market is relatively large with a wide range of both customers and manufacturers.
Most applications are very application specific and customer focused solutions. Standard offerings
for land based geodesic radomes range from 10 ft – 200 ft in diameter. Standard warranty
offerings generally include; 2 year water intrusion, 5 year surface degradation and 20 year on
overall structure.

Some recent installations have been found as replacements for aging infrastructure.
Existing market data research can be found (purchased) from Lucintel.com

Product Applications

• Military and Civil Radar


• Weather Radar
• Microwave
• Surveillance
• Telecommunications
• Satellite Communications
• Broadcast Equipment
• Coastal Surveillance
• Military and Civil Flight Simulation

Existing Manufacturers

Manufacturers vary greatly from small job shops making custom one off to low production radomes
and some are large, well established turnkey solutions providers from engineering to worldwide
installations. Please see page 7 for a list of qualified manufacturers.

1 | CCI Radome R&D White Paper | © Competition Composites Inc. │ Not to be reproduced without permission.
│ www.fastcomposites.ca │

Types / Classes / Styles


Radomes for use on flight vehicles, surface vehicles and fixed ground installations are classified
into various categories according to MIL-R-7705B. Categories are determined by the specific
radome use and wall construction. Customer satisfaction is met by the following:

Types Definitions
• Type I: low frequency radomes at or below 2 GHz.
• Type II: Directional guidance radomes having specified directional accuracy requirements.
Boresight error (BSE), boresight error slope (BSES), antenna pattern distortion and
antenna sidelobe degradation.
• Type III : narrowband radomes with an operational bandwidth less than 10%.
• Type IV: multiple frequency band radomes used at two or more narrow frequency bands.
• Type V: broadband radomes generally providing an operational bandwidth
between 0.100GHz and 0.667GHz.
• Type VI: very broadband radomes that provide and operational bandwidth
greater than 0.667GHz.

Style Definitions
Radome styles are defined according to the dielectric wall construction. There are 5 basic styles.

• Style A: Half wave wall solid (monolithic).


• Style B: Thin wall monolithic with a wall thickness equal to or less than 0.1λ wavelengths at
the highest operating frequency.
• Style C: A-Sandwich multilayered wall. Consisting of three layers: two high density skins
and a low density core. The dielectric constant of the skins is greater than the dielectric
constant of the core material. 0.25λ wavelengths.
• Style D: Multi layered wall having 5 or more dielectric layers. Odd number of high density
layers and an even number of low density core layers. As the number of layers is
increased, the broadband frequency performance is improved.
• Style E: Other radome wall constructions not fitting into the above style definitions.
Including the B-Sandwich consisting of two low density skins and a high density core.
Dielectric constant of the skins is less than the dielectric constant of the core.

2 | CCI Radome R&D White Paper | © Competition Composites Inc. │ Not to be reproduced without permission.
│ www.fastcomposites.ca │

Design Considerations for Terrestrial Based Radomes


The majority of radomes are designed individually to satisfy a unique set of specific requirements.
These requirements include; cost, operating frequency, broadband performance, signal noise,
signal distortions such as insertion loss, boresight error and scattering. There are multiple
techniques used to improve the performance of the radome.

Cost considerations
The cost of a radome is primarily dependent on the size of the structure and increases with the
radome surface area. The material and labor costs in a radome will increase dramatically with the
diameter. This is due to the fact that doubling the diameter of a sphere will increase the surface
area by a factor of four. Thin wall dielectric space frame radomes are approximately 35 percent
less expensive than a comparable 3-layer sandwich core radome.

Mechanical Considerations
Most sandwich radomes are designed to operate with wind loads of up to 150mph and snow and
ice loading of up to 50 lb-ft². Structural supports are generally used for thin laminate radomes while
the flange structure of sandwich radomes provides the basis for support.
• Wall Design: radome styles, # of layers, thickness, permittivity of materials, panel sizes and
shape (flat is better), dome geometry, truncation, flange design.
• Ancillary inclusions; doors, hatches, hoists, lightning protection, lighting, hydrophobic
coatings and accessory buildings.

Construction and Materials


Materials used in the construction of radomes include fiberglass, quartz, graphite and Kevlar.
Resins include polyester, vinyl ester, cyanate ester and epoxies. Construction techniques include
hand lamination, infusion and prepreg fibers. Laminate consistency is also a component in radome
performance and as such some manufacturers only produce radomes using prepreg materials.
Core materials such as honeycomb and foams (thermo formable cores) are used. For high
toleranced specifications a clean room is required. No carbon can enter the laminate as this can
significantly reduce system performance. See Table 1 and 2 on page 4.

3 | CCI Radome R&D White Paper | © Competition Composites Inc. │ Not to be reproduced without permission.
│ www.fastcomposites.ca │

DiElectric Properties of Reinforcements

Table 1: Radome materials and their electrical properties. (x-band data).

Reinforcement: Relative Permittivity: Loss Tangent:


E-Glass 6.06 .004
S-Glass 5.2 .007
D-Glass 4 .005
Spectra 2.25 .0004
Kevlar 4.1 .02
Quartz 3.8 .0001

Reinforcement: Relative Permittivity: Loss Tangent:


Polyester 2.95 .007
Epoxy 3.6 .04

Table 2: Combined materials and their electrical properties.

Reinforcement: Resin Relative Permittivity: Loss Tangent:


E-Glass Epoxy 4.4 .016
Polyester 4.7 .015

D-Glass Polycyanate 3.45 .009

Spectra Epoxy 2.8 .004

Kevlar Polyester 3.5 .05

Quartz Epoxy 3.12 .011


Polyester 3.6 .012

Operating Frequency Considerations (Focus on Sandwich Radomes)


A-Sandwich radomes can be tuned if the foam core thickness is varied for a particular RF
frequency to achieve a desired insertion loss. Insertion loss reduces the available signal,
decreasing effective radiated power and G/T (the ability of the antenna to receive a weak signal).

In order to maintain minimum transmission loss the core thickness would vary from 1in at 3 GHz to
1/4in at 8GHz. The insertion loss of sandwich material is a function of the thickness of the core. By
varying the thickness, optimal performance is achieved for the particular frequency of interest. This
is known as quarter wave matching.

• Insertion loss – Total energy loss due to reflection and absorption loss.
• Reflection loss – Energy loss because it is reflected by the radome.
• Absorption loss – Energy loss because it is absorbed and converted to heat.

Detailed formula and calculations can be found in: Analysis of Radome Enclosed Antennas * Dennis J. Kozakoff.

4 | CCI Radome R&D White Paper | © Competition Composites Inc. │ Not to be reproduced without permission.
│ www.fastcomposites.ca │

Radome Geometry Considerations


Three common varying configurations of radome geometries in use classified by the number of
different panels used to construct them. 3-Panel, 5-Panel and Quasi-random radomes.

The geometry chosen can cause a scattering error at certain frequencies. If the radome were
constructed of identical panels the error would be repeated. To minimize this scattering the radome
can be designed in a random panel design configuration or the quasi-random panel. Quasi-random
geometry radomes may have triangular, hexagonal or pentagonal panel shapes. A geodesic
radome using triangular panels is an alternate implementation of the quasi-random radome
geometry.

Framework shadowing is more complicated and depends on the radome geometry. Radome
geometry is a term used to describe how the truncated sphere is separated into panel shapes.
The mathematical process is known as tessellating the sphere. The orange peel style is practical
for domes under 6.7m in diameter, while the Quasi-random is well suited for larger radomes.
Not shown is the 5 panel “igloo” design.

Fig. 1 Orange Peel Fig 2 Quasi-Random

“Considering the radome geometry of Figures 1 and


2, the framework shadow on the reflector surface is a
complicated geometry problem dependent on the
radome diameter, panel size, the antenna diameter
and antenna scan angle. To keep scattering loss low,
normal practice is to use large radome panels.
Therefore as the radome diameter gets smaller, the
radome is manufactured from fewer panels.”

www.radome.net

“the quasi-randome geometry is fundamental to


achieving enhanced RF performance.”

www.radome.net
a.manz@gematronik.com

5 | CCI Radome R&D White Paper | © Competition Composites Inc. │ Not to be reproduced without permission.
│ www.fastcomposites.ca │

Radome Flanges and Joints


The electromagnetic performance of a sandwich radome is made up of loss or scattering
attributable to 1) the panel window area and 2) the panel flanges.
Loss and shift of phase due to the second factor (i.e., the panel flanges) can be nine times that
of the panel window area. As a result, the flanges must be tuned or impedance-matched to the
window area.
There are 2 flange framework forms common to the radome industry. The first type is called
a perpendicular joint. The second type is called a parallel lap joint. Figures 3 and 4 picture
flange framework forms.

Fig. 3 Fig. 4

The hardware for the perpendicular joint is internal to the radome. In contrast from Figure 4, the
parallel lap joint hardware punctures the radome surface and is both external and internal to the
radome. Parallel lap joint hardware protrusions collect dirt and fungus and allows corrosion to
attack metals exposed to the outside environment. From a framework shadow point of view, the
perpendicular joint has a very narrow cross section. This contrasts significantly with the large lap
joint cross section shadowing the dish reflector. Due to its smaller width, the perpendicular joint
has a scattering width 8 times smaller than its parallel lap joint counterpart.

Hydrophobic Coatings
Nothing degrades radome performance more than a thin sheet
of water. Water has a very high dielectric constant and loss
tangent at microwave frequencies. Non-hydrophobic surfaces
cause water to stick to the radome, creating a thin film which
serves as a shield to RF transmission, resulting in significant Photo above shows both a
non-coated surface and a
signal attenuation. Well-designed radomes feature a hydro-
coated hydrophobic surface.
phobic surface that causes water to bead up and run off. Even ®HUZHENG/CS-101

in high rain conditions, a radome with a hydrophobic surface has


little additional attenuation. A surface is hydrophobic if the contact
angle is greater than 90 degrees.

6 | CCI Radome R&D White Paper | © Competition Composites Inc. │ Not to be reproduced without permission.
│ www.fastcomposites.ca │

For Additional Information see Following Titles and Website Links

Manufacturers of Radomes

• Competition Composites Inc.: www.fastcomposites.ca


• ESSCO: www2.L-3com.com
• AFC: www.radome.net
• Military Systems & Technology: www.militarysystems-tech.com
• Alan Dick Radar & Cellular Technology: www.alandickrc.com
• Tods Aerospace Limited: www.tods.co.uk
• L-3 Communications: www2.l-3com.com/the importance of hydrophobic coating.html

Appendix of Documents:

• Scattering Effect of Seams on Sandwich Radome Performance by Reuven Shavit


o Scat-effect-in-sand-radomes.pdf

• NeverWet_White_Paper___General.pdf

• Electromagnetic Modelling of Dielectric Geodesic Radomes using the Finite Difference-Time Domain
o Method by Stavros Papadopoulos: STAVROS_Papadopoulos_Thesis.pdf

• Radome Influence on Weather Radar Systems Principles and Calibration Issues


by Alexander Manz, radcal-11-manz-radome.pdf

• Radomes and antennas Electronically Transparent Materials - Low Dielectric Composites


o TCAC_radomesantennasguide.pdf

• Standard Molded Radomes ,


o Standard-Molded-Radomes.pdf

• RFbeam Microwave GmbH,


o AN-03-radome.pdf

• Analysis and Design of Radome in Millimeter Wave Band


o Hongfu Meng and Wenbin Dou
o InTech-Analysis_and_design_of_radome_in_millimeter_wave_band.pdf

• EEC (Enterprise Electronics Corporation)


o Stealthradome.pdf

7 | CCI Radome R&D White Paper | © Competition Composites Inc. │ Not to be reproduced without permission.
│ www.fastcomposites.ca │

Other References

A Fundamental and Technical Review of Radomes


http://www.mpdigest.com/issue/articles/2008/may/mfg/default.asp

AFC Radome.Net-
www.Radome.net/tl.html#design

Micris ltd
www.micris.co.uk/radomes

Tods
www.tods.co.uk/radome/radomes.html

Legacy Radomes
www.legacyradomes.com

Comtek
www.comtek.com

Essco
www2.l-3.com/essco/radomes

MFG Galileo
www.moldedfiberglass.com

Saint-Gobain
www.radome.com

CSS
www.canspace.com

AlanDickInc
www.militarysystems-tech.com / www.alandickrc.com

Advanced Composites Engineering


www.Advancedcompositesengineering.com

Dielectric Constant, Strength, & Loss Tangent


www.rfcafe.com/references/electrical/dielectric-constants-strengths.htm

Geodesica (geodesic dome modeling software)

Hydrophobic coatings information:


http://cytonix.com/coatingdata.html

www2.l-3com.com/the importance of hydrophobic coating.html

http://www.cytonix.com/honeywell.html

Competition Composites Inc. Contact Information


Dave Bradly
President, Competition Composites Inc.
168 Wescar Lane, Carp, Ontario, Canada K0A 1L0
T: +1-613-599-6951
E: dave@fastcomposites.ca

8 | CCI Radome R&D White Paper | © Competition Composites Inc. │ Not to be reproduced without permission.

You might also like