Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 968 views

    Speaking Rubric Giving Directions

    Uploaded by

    Miriam Garcia Rodriguez
    The document provides a rubric for assessing students' performance on a band task in four areas: task fulfilment, language, interaction and fluency, and pronunciation. It rates performance on a scale of 0 to 2.5, with higher scores indicating stronger performance. A score of 2.5 reflects fluent communication without effort and few errors. Lower scores around 1.5 show some effort and inaccuracies. The lowest scores near 0 indicate an inability to complete the task or use the language despite prompts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Speaking Rubric Giving Directions

    Uploaded by

    Miriam Garcia Rodriguez
    968 views1 page
    The document provides a rubric for assessing students' performance on a band task in four areas: task fulfilment, language, interaction and fluency, and pronunciation. It rates performance on a scale of 0 to 2.5, with higher scores indicating stronger performance. A score of 2.5 reflects fluent communication without effort and few errors. Lower scores around 1.5 show some effort and inaccuracies. The lowest scores near 0 indicate an inability to complete the task or use the language despite prompts.

    Original Description:

    A rubric to assess speaking

    Original Title

    Speaking Rubric Giving Directions (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides a rubric for assessing students' performance on a band task in four areas: task fulfilment, language, interaction and fluency, and pronunciation. It rates performance on a scale of 0 to 2.5, with higher scores indicating stronger performance. A score of 2.5 reflects fluent communication without effort and few errors. Lower scores around 1.5 show some effort and inaccuracies. The lowest scores near 0 indicate an inability to complete the task or use the language despite prompts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    968 views1 page

    Speaking Rubric Giving Directions

    Uploaded by

    Miriam Garcia Rodriguez
    The document provides a rubric for assessing students' performance on a band task in four areas: task fulfilment, language, interaction and fluency, and pronunciation. It rates performance on a scale of 0 to 2.5, with higher scores indicating stronger performance. A score of 2.5 reflects fluent communication without effort and few errors. Lower scores around 1.5 show some effort and inaccuracies. The lowest scores near 0 indicate an inability to complete the task or use the language despite prompts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Band Task fulfilment Language Interaction and fluency Pronunciation

    2,5 - Information gap is bridged - Language demanded by - Student interacts fluently - Great pronunciation.
    successfully. Student is fluent and communicative situation (SS with his/her classmate. - Efforts to avoid typical
    communicates the message without uses at least 3 directions and 2 pronunciation errors by
    much effort. prepositions of place ) are used. Spanish students are noticeable
    - Some instances of self-repair may - Few inaccuracies tend to be
    be present. self-repaired.
    - Few communication breakdowns. If
    they occur, they are sorted promptly.
    2 - Elements of both bands 2,5 and 1,5. - Elements of both bands 2,5 - Elements of both bands 2,5 - Elements of both bands 2,5
    and 1,5. and 1,5. and 1,5.
    1,5 - Information gap is bridged - Some of the language - Student struggles to - Pronunciation issue do not
    successfully, although the student demanded by communicative interact with his/her prevent understanding.
    shows some effort to communicate situation is activated classmate but makes an
    because of lack of fluency. accurately, but other is lacking effort.
    - Frequent instances of self-repair. or incorrect.
    - Some prompts needed from the - Inaccuracies often go
    teacher to repair communication unnoticed to students. They're
    breakdowns. not serious enough for
    communication breakdowns to
    occur.
    1 - Elements of both bands 1,5 and 0,5. - Elements of both bands 1,5 - Elements of both bands 1,5 - Elements of both bands 1,5
    and 0,5. and 0,5. and 0,5.
    0,5 - Despite constant prompts from the - The students is unable to - Student doesn’t seem to - Pronunciation issues make
    teacher and the other student, the activate the language understand what his/her production mostly
    student doesn’t manage to bridge the demanded by communicative classmate’ questions and is incomprehensible.
    information gap successfully. situation. mostly unable to interact.
    0 - Refused to participate or didn’t - Refused to participate or - Refused to participate or - Refused to participate or
    speak in English. didn’t speak in English. didn’t speak in English. didn’t speak in English.

    You might also like