2

Au: Please answer

queries on pages 4
and 22.

ALTERING VERTICAL DIMENSION

IN THE PERIO-RESTORATIVE PATIENT:
THE ORTHODONTIC POSSIBILITIES
Vincent G. Kokich, DDS, MSD

The location of the occlusal plane

limits the scope of improvement

in facial height.
 P
2 A LTERING V ERTICAL D IMENSION IN THE P ERIO -R ESTORATIVE P ATIENT • Kokich

PHILOSOPHY AND BACKGROUND

In the past decade, the number of adults seeking orthodontic treatment has grown substantially.
Today, in most orthodontic practices, 30% to 50% of patients in active orthodontic treatment
are adults. My practice is devoted completely to adults. Although adolescent and adult malocclu-
sions are similar, adults usually have additional problems that make their treatment more chal-
lenging. One of the most destructive is anterior tooth wear combined with compensatory
eruption of the abraded teeth. When this type of patient is referred to me by a restorative den-
tist, the common request from the clinician is to “open the vertical” to allow adequate restora-
tion of the teeth. What does “open the vertical” mean to you? What should it mean to the
orthodontist with whom you are collaborating? Actually, there may be a distinct difference in
what is necessary and what is orthodontically possible in an adult patient with worn and/or
abraded anterior teeth. Although some clinicans believe that patients with anterior tooth wear
are “overclosed” and need to have their vertical dimension increased, this diagnosis and the
resulting treatment plan are usually inappropriate. The problem typically is compensatory
eruption of the anterior teeth, secondary to incisal wear. The problem for the restorative dentist
is insufficient space to restore these teeth without further tooth reduction, possible crown
lengthening, and perhaps root canal therapy. However, orthodontists can intrude the maxillary
incisors, mandibular incisors, or both in order to create restorative space, move the gingival
margins apically, and eliminate the need for further tooth reduction. The team of orthodontist
and restorative dentist must decide which teeth are to be intruded, how long they are to be held
in position, and how this type of tooth movement will affect the patient’s esthetic appearance.

U USING MAXILLARY AND MANDIBULAR

INTRUSION TO CREATE RESTORATIVE SPACE:
FOUR GUIDING PRINCIPLES
One of the most perplexing problems for general dentists is how to manage restorative treat-
ment for the adult patient with a deep anterior overbite. In most cases, there is little or no
room to prepare the anterior teeth adequately, and creating space for restorative materials
often requires significant reduction of the existing teeth. Moderate to extensive wear or abra-
sion of the maxillary and/or mandibular incisors further complicates the overbite problem.
As these teeth wear, they usually continue to erupt, bringing the bone and gingiva with them.
In order to restore these short teeth, the restorative dentist typically considers two possi-
ble treatment plans. One option involves crown lengthening of the short abraded teeth, followed
by potential root canal therapy, post and core buildups, and eventual restoration of the teeth.
Another option is to open the patient’s vertical dimension by restoring most of the posterior
teeth in order to gain the space needed to restore the anterior teeth. However, there is a third pos-
sibility—orthodontics and/or orthognathic surgery. Orthodontists can intrude maxillary and
mandibular anterior teeth to create restorative space. In some situations, orthognathic surgery of
the mandible and/or maxilla can open the patient’s anterior vertical dimension to improve facial
esthetics and provide restorative space. This chapter presents and illustrates the governing prin-
ciples and the diagnostic techniques required to correctly analyze and prescribe the appropriate
treatment for these types of problems.

2
 U SING M AXILLARY AND M ANDIBULAR I NTRUSION TO C REATE R ESTORATIVE S PACE : F OUR G UIDING P RINCIPLES

Advantages of growth
In order to fully comprehend the orthodontic possibilities in resolving problems of vertical
dimension, the clinician must first understand the importance of facial growth. Most ortho-
dontic patients are treated during childhood and adolescence. There are several reasons for cor-
recting a malocclusion early in life, but one of the most important is to take advantage of a
patient’s facial growth potential.
The face grows in two ways. The first is sutural growth, which occurs at the circummaxillary
sutures that suspend the maxilla from the skull. But the major source of vertical change that
occurs during adolescent growth is found in the mandibular condyle. As the condyle grows, the
ramus of the mandible gets longer. During this process, the teeth erupt to fill the space created
by ramus growth. This is advantageous in managing a deep overbite in an adolescent patient.
Instead of intruding the teeth to resolve the overeruption of the maxillary and mandibular inci-
sors, ramus growth permits space for the posterior teeth to erupt. If the maxillary and/or
mandibular incisors are held in their original vertical position during this process, the deep
overbite is corrected through posterior tooth eruption and relative incisor intrusion. This pos-
sibility simplifies the management of a deep overbite.
However, facial growth is essentially complete for females in the mid to late teenage years
and for males by the early twenties. In an adult patient with a deep anterior overbite, growth is
not a possibility. Therefore, the orthodontist must rely on intrusion of the maxillary incisors,
intrusion of the mandibular incisors, or jaw surgery to correct deep overbites in adults. How do
orthodontists diagnose which teeth to intrude and when to use orthognathic surgery to cor-
rect problems of vertical dimension? If the patient’s anterior teeth are worn and abraded, what
is the restorative dentist’s role in the interdisciplinary treatment plan for the restoration of
these teeth? In order to answer these questions, I will explain how the diagnostic process works
and the principles I use to handle these types of patients.

Principle 1
The location of the occlusal plane limits the scope of improvement in facial height.

When I am challenged to determine how to provide restorative space in the patient with a
deep anterior overbite, my first step is to determine the patient’s correct occlusal plane using
the fixed landmarks (ie, those that I cannot control) as my guide. To do this, I identify the
occlusal contact point between the maxillary and mandibular second molars. In an adult, I can-
not change this relationship. Opening the vertical dimension by extruding maxillary and/or
mandibular molars is not stable in adults. Since adults are not growing, the muscles of masti-
cation (primarily the masseter, medial pterygoid, and temporalis) do not have the capacity to
stretch. Attempts to increase posterior facial height with orthognathic surgery have consistently
been unstable, and the vertical dimension usually reverts to its original level.1–3 So, using the
contact between the maxillary and mandibular second molars allows me to realistically deter-
mine the posterior limit of the occlusal plane.
Next, I must identify a point anteriorly that will represent a realistic guide for the other end
of the patient’s occlusal plane. For this I use the level of the patient’s upper lip at rest. Again, I
cannot alter the position of the upper lip in a nongrowing adult. In addition, if a deep overbite is
corrected by intruding anterior teeth, then it is important to intrude the correct teeth and pro-
vide the patient with a pleasing esthetic appearance of the teeth relative to the upper lip after
treatment. So, the occlusal plane connects the occlusal contact between the maxillary and man-
dibular second molars and the upper lip. This is the first step in the diagnostic process.

3
2 A LTERING V ERTICAL D IMENSION IN THE P ERIO -R ESTORATIVE P ATIENT • Kokich

Principle 2
The relationship between the incisors and the occlusal plane reveals the cause of the overbite.

The next step in the diagnostic process is to determine which incisor, maxillary or mandibular,
has “overerupted” and is causing the deep overbite. My procedure is to identify the incisal edge of
the maxillary central incisor and measure its distance from the occlusal plane. This distance will
vary with age. In a 30-year-old, the distance from the occlusal plane (upper lip) to the maxillary
central incisal edge at rest should be about 3 mm. However, studies of older adults have shown
that this distance decreases with time, and in a 60-year-old it is not unusual for the distance from
the incisal edge to the upper lip to be 0 mm with the upper lip at rest.
So, if the patient is 30 years of age, and the distance from the maxillary incisor to the
occlusal plane is 5 mm, then at least part of the deep overbite problem is due to overeruption
of the maxillary incisors. These teeth could be orthodontically intruded 2 mm to assist in cor-
recting the deep anterior overbite.
Next, I identify the position of the mandibular incisal edge and measure its distance to the
occlusal plane. The mandibular incisal edge should be at or near the level of the occlusal plane.
If these teeth are 3 to 4 mm above the occlusal plane, then the deep overbite is most likely due
to overeruption of the mandibular incisors. These teeth would need to be intruded 3 to 4 mm
in order to place the incisal edge at the occlusal plane, correct the deep overbite, and allow the
general dentist to complete the restorative treatment for the patient.
However, the maxillary and/or mandibular incisors could be abraded as a result of a brux-
ing habit. In these cases, intruding the maxillary and/or mandibular incisors would correct the
incisal edge position of these teeth, but the general dentist may still need space to restore these
teeth to a longer length. In other words, these teeth may need to be intruded further. The next
step in the diagnostic process is to assess the gingival levels and crown proportions of the max-
illary and mandibular central incisors relative to the lateral incisors and canines.

Principle 3
The correct gingival position determines whether intrusion is the right solution, and crown
proportions govern the amount of lengthening that is desirable.

Once the incisal edges of the maxillary and mandibular central and lateral incisors have been
positioned correctly relative to the occlusal plane, the next step is to verify their esthetic appearance
(maxillary incisors) and structural integrity (mandibular incisors). If the gingival margins of the
central incisors are coronal to those of the canines, this could indicate either that these teeth are
abraded or that the gingival margins are positioned too far coronally. Sulcus depth helps to reveal
the correct diagnosis; therefore, my next step is to measure it with a probe.
If the sulcus depth is 1 mm [Au: or more?] and the cementoenamel junction is located at
the bottom of the sulcus, then the position of the gingival margin is correct. In this case, the
patient likely has incisal wear. I confirm this suspicion by evaluating the maxillary and/or
mandibular incisal edges. If I see dentin at these edges, it shows that the patient has abraded at
least 2 mm and perhaps more from the incisal edges of these teeth. In this case I would intrude
the maxillary and/or mandibular incisors an additional 2 mm or more to position the gingival
margin at the correct level relative to that of the maxillary and/or mandibular canines. This
permits lengthening of the maxillary and mandibular incisors.

4
 U SING M AXILLARY AND M ANDIBULAR I NTRUSION TO C REATE R ESTORATIVE S PACE : F OUR G UIDING P RINCIPLES

The amount of lengthening desired can be determined by evaluating the width-to-length

proportion of the maxillary and mandibular incisors and selecting a proportion that fits the
patient’s esthetic and occlusal needs as well as the structural requirements for the eventual
maxillary and/or mandibular restorations.

Principle 4
The need for jaw surgery depends on facial proportions.

Most patients with deep anterior overbites can be treated in the manner described above. How-
ever, if the overbite is severe and/or if the patient’s facial dimensions are extremely disproportion-
ate, jaw surgery is another possible option for decreasing the deep overbite. In order to determine
whether jaw surgery is necessary, I evaluate the patient’s facial proportions, specifically the ratio
of upper to lower facial height. The upper facial height is measured from the glabella region at
the base of the forehead to a point just beneath the nose; the lower facial height is the distance
from the point beneath the nose to a point below the chin. These measurements can be performed
using a lateral facial photograph or a cephalometric radiograph.
The normal proportion is around 45% upper to 55% lower facial height. However, if a
patient presents with a deep overbite and the upper to lower facial height ratio is 55% to 45%,
respectively, the patient has a significant shortening of the lower facial height. Although the
deep overbite could perhaps be treated with tooth intrusion, this solution may not enhance the
patient’s esthetic appearance. In these situations, a mandibular sagittal split osteotomy and
rotation of the mandible down in the chin area will open the anterior vertical dimension while
maintaining the posterior contact between the maxillary and mandibular second molars,
which will maintain the posterior vertical dimension. After the surgery, an open bite is usually
present between the maxillary and mandibular premolars. These teeth are then erupted into
occlusion. This type of surgery reduces the complexity of the orthodontic treatment but still
corrects the deep overbite and improves the facial proportions for the patient.
In some extreme situations, both maxillary and mandibular surgery are necessary to cor-
rect a deep overbite and improve facial proportions. This treatment plan is appropriate for the
person who shows little or none of his or her maxillary incisors at rest and when smiling. If the
patient wants to show more of the maxillary incisors, then the only realistic and stable solution
is to rotate both the maxilla and mandible downward anteriorly but maintain the posterior ver-
tical dimension at the same level. This strategy does not alter the contact between the maxillary
and mandibular second molars and therefore does not increase posterior vertical dimension,
hence reducing the potential for relapse.
Clinicians who apply these principles to the diagnosis of patients with deep anterior over-
bites and anterior tooth wear should be able to determine the appropriate treatment plan for
restoring the patient. To further elucidate and demonstrate the application of these principles,
I will use the following case reports to illustrate how the diagnostic process and resulting treat-
ment should unfold.

5
FIG 2-1 This woman had a deep anterior overbite (a), retroclined maxillary and mandibular incisors (b), and several unesthetic
existing restorations (c). Since the cause of the deep overbite (d) was shown to be overeruption of the mandibular (e) and maxil-
lary incisors, they were intruded orthodontically (f,g). As a result, the patient’s occlusion (h) and smile esthetics (i) were improved
greatly (j).

a b c

A APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLES

Case 1: Deep anterior overbite
This 32-year-old woman was concerned about the esthetic appearance of her maxillary anterior
teeth and desired an “esthetic makeover.” She had several long-standing restorations in her max-
illary anterior teeth (Fig 2-1a). Her anterior overbite was deep (Fig 2-1b), and the mandibular inci-
sors were impinging on the palatal gingiva. She had a normal Class I posterior occlusion with
good interdigitation of her posterior teeth.
I first established the occlusal plane between the occlusal surface of the second molar and
her upper lip. The maxillary central incisor was 4 mm, rather than the ideal 3 mm, below the
occlusal plane. The mandibular central incisor, which should be at the level of the occlusal
plane, was 3 mm above it. There was no incisal wear on either the maxillary or mandibular inci-
sors. The gingival margins of both maxillary and mandibular central incisors were coronal to
those of the canines (Fig 2-1c), indicating that the anterior teeth had overerupted. Prior to the
patient’s restorative treatment, orthodontics was initiated to intrude the mandibular incisors
by 3 mm and to intrude the maxillary incisors by 1 mm (Figs 2-1d to 2-1f). As a result, the over-
bite was reduced by 4 mm, leaving the patient with a good anterior occlusal relationship (Figs
2-1g and 2-1h) and improved smile esthetics (Fig 2-1i). The result after restorative dentistry is
shown in Fig 2-1j.

6
d e f

g h

i j

7
FIG 2-2 This man was unhappy with his short maxillary incisors (a). The deep anterior overbite (b) prevented the dentist from
lengthening these teeth. The overbite was primarily due to overeruption of the maxillary incisors and a protrusive bruxing habit
(c) that resulted in significant wear (d). Orthodontic brackets were placed (e) to intrude the overerupted teeth (f) and level the
gingival margins. The teeth were provisionally restored with composite (g,h), and eventually restored with porcelain veneers (i).

a b

Case 2: Deep anterior overbite and short maxillary incisors

This 42-year-old male firefighter was concerned about his short maxillary anterior teeth. His
wife, a hygienist, encouraged him to see her employer about lengthening his maxillary inci-
sors. The patient had a healthy periodontium and no temporomandibular joint symptoms.
He had a well interdigitated Class I posterior occlusion with a deep anterior overbite (Figs 2-2a
and 2-2b). The challenge was giving the patient longer maxillary incisors considering his deep
anterior overbite. The first step was to determine the cause of the problem. In order to do this,
I established the patient’s occlusal plane on the cephalometric radiograph between the second
molars and the upper lip. The maxillary central incisal edges were 3 mm below that level; at
his age, they could be 2 mm from the level of the upper lip. The mandibular central incisal
edges were 1 mm above the level of the occlusal plane. These findings indicated that the deep
overbite was due in minor degree to the position of the mandibular incisors but was more pro-
foundly influenced by overeruption of the maxillary incisors. However, the patient also had a
severe protrusive bruxing habit (Fig 2-2c) and had worn his maxillary incisal edges into the
dentin (Fig 2-2d). In particular, about 3 mm of wear was observed at the incisal edge of the
maxillary right central incisor, with compensatory eruption of this tooth. Prior to initiation
of restorative dentistry, orthodontic brackets were placed on the teeth (Fig 2-2e) in an arrange-
ment that would intrude the abraded teeth (Fig 2-2f), using the gingival margins as a guide to
the amount of tooth intrusion. After the gingival margins had been leveled, the incisal edges
were provisionally restored with composite (Figs 2-2g and 2-2h). One year after orthodontics,
the maxillary incisors were restored with porcelain veneers (Fig 2-2i). Orthodontic intrusion
of the maxillary incisors not only provided restorative space but also helped reduce the deep
overbite.

8
c d

e f g

h i

9
FIG 2-3 This man had a deep anterior overbite (a,b) due to wear and overeruption of both maxillary and mandibular incisors
(c,d). The mandibular central incisors (e,f) and the maxillary right central incisors (g,h) were intruded substantially to level the
gingival margins and provide restorative space for the provisional composite restoration of these teeth during orthodontics.
One year after orthodontic therapy, porcelain veneers were placed on the maxillary and mandibular central incisors (i).

a b

Case 3: Deep anterior overbite and abraded maxillary

and mandibular incisors
This 55-year-old man had sensitivity in his mandibular incisors due to their extensive wear. He
was also concerned about the appearance of his maxillary anterior teeth. His mandibular inci-
sors needed restoration; however, there was no space to restore these teeth because of his deep
anterior overbite (Figs 2-3a and 2-3b). His general dentist wanted to “open the vertical” in order
to restore the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth.
Following my standard procedure, I first established the patient’s occlusal plane between the
occlusal surface of the second molars and the upper lip. The maxillary incisors were 2 mm coro-
nal to this line, which is reasonably normal for his age. The mandibular incisal edges, however,
were 2 mm above the occlusal plane, when they should be at the same level. Both maxillary and
mandibular incisors had been abraded over the years, and dentin was evident at the incisal edges
of the maxillary and mandibular central incisors (Figs 2-3c and 2-3d). As the incisal edges had
worn, all of these teeth had overerupted and become too short; therefore, they needed to be
lengthened restoratively. Prerestorative orthodontics was used to intrude the mandibular cen-
tral incisors (Fig 2-3e), which were then provisionally restored with composite (Fig 2-3f). The
maxillary right central incisor was also intruded 2 mm (Fig 2-3g) and provisionally restored (Fig
2-3h) in order to level the gingival margins and provide the patient with maxillary central inci-
sors of more normal proportion. One year after orthodontic therapy, the restorative dentist
placed porcelain veneers on the maxillary and mandibular central incisors to provide a more
durable and esthetic restoration of these teeth (Fig 2-3i).

10
c d

e f

g h

11
FIG 2-4 This woman had a deep anterior overbite (a), and her maxillary incisors were heavily restored with poor structural integrity
beneath the existing restorations (b,c). The maxillary incisors were extracted, and immediate implants were placed in the lateral inci-
sor sockets (d). After 5 months of healing (e), a four-unit implant-supported provisional partial denture was placed, and brackets were
attached to facilitate orthodontics (f). Since the mandibular incisors were worn and overerupted (g), these teeth were intruded (h,i)
and provisionalized with composite (j) during orthodontics. After 1 year, porcelain veneers were placed on the mandibular inci-
sors (k), and a porcelain-fused-to-metal four-unit implant-supported partial denture replaced the maxillary incisors (l).

a b c

Case 4: Unsalvageable maxillary incisors and abraded

mandibular incisors
This 48-year-old woman with a deep anterior overbite (Fig 2-4a) wanted to improve the esthet-
ics of her smile. Her maxillary incisors had previously been restored, and the right central and
lateral incisors had received root canal therapy (Figs 2-4b and 2-4c). She had a long history of
protrusive bruxism and, as a result, had abraded the palatal surfaces of the maxillary anterior
teeth and had lost nearly half the length of her mandibular incisors. The resulting overbite was
deep, with the mandibular incisors over-erupting and impinging near the palatal gingival mar-
gins of the maxillary incisors. It was decided that the maxillary incisors were structurally dis-
advantaged and could not be restored predictably. The restorative plan involved extraction of
all four maxillary incisors and placement of immediate implants in the maxillary lateral inci-
sor sockets (Fig 2-4d) and, after 5 months of healing (Fig 2-4e), provisional restoration with a
four-unit implant-supported partial denture (Fig 2-4f). However, the mandibular anterior teeth
were severely worn (Fig 2-4g), and there was insufficient space to restore these teeth without
further extensive tooth reduction.
The incisal edges of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth were appropriately related
to the occlusal plane. The problem was overeruption and wear of the mandibular incisors. The
solution was intrusion of the mandibular incisors, provisional restoration of the incisal edges
with composite, and replacement of the orthodontic brackets (Figs 2-4h to 2-4j) to stabilize the
position of these teeth. One year after orthodontic treatment was completed, the mandibular
incisors were restored with porcelain veneers (Fig 2-4k), and the maxillary incisors were restored
with a four-unit implant-supported porcelain-fused-to-metal partial denture (Fig 2-4l).

12
d e f

g h

i j

k l

13
FIG 2-5 This man had a deep anterior overbite (a), retroclined maxillary and mandibular incisors (b), and severe attrition of
the labial and incisal surfaces of the mandibular anterior teeth (c). The overbite was a result of wear and overeruption of the
mandibular incisors. In this case, the incisors were provisionalized before orthodontics (d), so that brackets could be placed
(e) for intrusion of the mandibular incisors (f,g). One year after orthodontic therapy, porcelain veneers were placed on the
mandibular incisors (h), and porcelain crowns were placed on the maxillary central incisors (i).

a b

Case 5: Lingually inclined maxillary incisors and

severely abraded mandibular incisors
This 56-year-old man had a very deep anterior overbite with lingual inclination of the maxillary
incisors (Figs 2-5a and 2-5b). Because of a vertical protrusive bruxing habit, he had severely
abraded the labial surfaces of the mandibular incisors and was interested in having these teeth
restored.
Again, my first step was to determine which teeth were responsible for the patient’s deep
anterior overbite by establishing the occlusal plane between the mandibular second molars and
the upper lip. The maxillary central incisal edges were appropriately located at the level of the
upper lip, which indicated that the deep overbite was not caused by the maxillary incisors. In
addition, the gingival margins of the maxillary central incisors were nearly even with those of
the canines. The incisal edges of the mandibular incisors were 2 mm above the occlusal plane.
However, this patient had worn away an estimated 2 to 3 mm of the mandibular incisal edges
(Fig 2-5c). Consequently, it is likely that the mandibular incisors had overerupted 4 to 5 mm.
The plan was to intrude the mandibular incisors about 4 mm to reduce the overbite. Com-
posite was placed on the teeth first to simulate their pre-abraded length (Fig 2-5d). Following
bracket placement (Fig 2-5e), the teeth were intruded 4 mm (Fig 2-5f). After bracket removal
(Fig 2-5g), the mandibular incisal edges, as well as the gingival margins, were in a more normal
relationship. One year after orthodontics, the restorative dentist placed porcelain veneers on
the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth (Figs 2-5h and 2-5i).

14
c d e

f g

h i

15
FIG 2-6 This man had an impinging anterior overbite (a), which had caused significant mandibular labial gingival recession (b).
The overbite, which measured 15 mm on the cephalometric radiograph (c), resulted from 2-mm overeruption of the maxillary
incisors (d) and 10-mm overeruption of the mandibular incisors (e). The treatment involved intrusion of the maxillary incisors
(2 mm), intrusion of the mandibular incisors (3 mm), mandibular sagittal osteotomy with downward rotation (7 mm), and
eruption of the posterior teeth to correct the mandibular curve of Spee (f,g). At the end of treatment, the resulting overbite was
3 mm (h), and the occlusion was re-established at a new anterior vertical dimension (i).

a b

Case 6: Extremely deep anterior overbite and

short lower facial height
This 34-year-old man was concerned about gingival discomfort in his palate resulting from an
extremely deep anterior overbite (Fig 2-6a). In addition, he had significant recession labial to
the mandibular incisors (Fig 2-6b) because of the deep overbite. The cephalometric radiograph
revealed a 15-mm vertical overlap of the maxillary and mandibular incisors (Fig 2-6c).
Once again, the first step was to establish the occlusal plane from the second molars to the
patient’s upper lip. The maxillary central incisal edges were 5 mm, rather than the optimal 3
mm, below the level of the occlusal plane. The mandibular incisal edges were 10 mm above the
occlusal plane; they should be at the same level. So it would seem that orthodontics would be
necessary to intrude the mandibular incisors 10 mm and to intrude the maxillary incisors 2
mm, leaving an overbite of 3 mm. The goal for the maxillary tooth position would be reason-
able (Fig 2-6d); however, the mandibular incisors could be intruded only about 3 mm (Fig 2-6e).
How could the remaining 7 mm of overbite (Fig 2-6f) be corrected?
The answer was found in the analysis of the patient’s facial proportions (see Fig 2-6c). The
patient’s upper facial height was 55%, and the lower facial height was 45%, which indicated that
the lower facial height was diminished. Orthognathic surgery could be used in this patient to
rotate the mandible open in the anterior without lengthening the posterior vertical dimension,
thereby maintaining posterior muscle length and avoiding potential relapse. Therefore, in this
patient, the maxillary incisors were intruded 2 mm, the mandibular incisors were intruded 3
mm, the mandible was rotated downward 7 mm with jaw surgery, and the posterior teeth were
erupted to correct the curve of Spee. This series of movements resulted in a 12-mm reduction
in the overbite, which greatly improved the patient’s anterior occlusion and the health of the
gingiva (Figs 2-6g to 2-6i).

16
 c

d e f

g h

17
2 A LTERING V ERTICAL D IMENSION IN THE P ERIO -R ESTORATIVE P ATIENT • Kokich

Case 7: Deep anterior overbite and extremely short

lower facial height
This 59-year-old woman was unhappy with the esthetic appearance of her smile. Specifically,
she showed very little of her maxillary incisors upon smiling. She had a heavily restored denti-
tion with a deep anterior overbite of 7 mm (Figs 2-7a to 2-7d).
The first step was to establish the occlusal plane between the second molars and the upper
lip. The maxillary incisal edges were 1 mm above, rather than 1 mm below, the level of the
occlusal plane. The mandibular incisal edges, which should be at the level of the occlusal plane,
were 5 mm above it. Intruding the mandibular incisors and extruding the maxillary incisors to
show more of the maxillary anterior teeth would be difficult to accomplish orthodontically.
However, the patient’s facial proportions, ie, her extremely short lower facial height, suggested
that she could benefit from mandibular surgery to rotate the mandible downward in front
combined with maxillary surgery to rotate the maxilla downward in the anterior. Both of these
surgeries could be accomplished without opening the posterior vertical dimension in order to
avoid altering muscle length and to enhance stability (Fig 2-7e). The alteration in facial propor-
tion in this patient after surgery vastly improved the esthetics of her smile (Figs 2-7f to 2-7h).

I
INCREASING THE VERTICAL DIMENSION
ORTHODONTICALLY: BIOLOGIC
CONSIDERATIONS
Planning restorative rehabilitation for a patient with a deep anterior overbite and significant max-
illary and mandibular anterior tooth wear is a challenging and often confusing task for the restora-
tive dentist. The typical thought process would suggest that the vertical dimension should be
increased by restoratively “opening the bite,” thereby permitting space to lengthen the abraded
teeth. However, if the tooth wear is limited to the mandibular incisors, then many nonabraded pos-
terior teeth would have to be restored to open the patient’s vertical dimension. In these situations,
the restorative dentist must realize that when teeth wear as a result of a protrusive bruxing habit,
they continue to erupt so as to maintain occlusal contact. As they erupt, they bring the gingiva and
bone with them. Therefore, the most logical method of correcting this problem is to intrude the
abraded teeth so that the crowns can be restored to their original length without further tooth
preparation. Adjunctive orthodontics is required to accomplish the intrusion.
In some patients with severe attrition of the mandibular anterior teeth, there is insufficient
crown length either to place orthodontic brackets or to permit adequate ferrule for tooth
preparation, or both. In these situations, some periodontal surgery and crown lengthening
prior to orthodontic intrusion may be appropriate.4 The key is to carefully assess the existing
crown length of the abraded teeth. Is there sufficient interproximal and labiolingual tooth
length to provide a minimum of 1.5 to 2 mm of ferrule? If the answer is yes, then orthodontic
intrusion can be used to create the interocclusal space, and the tooth preparation requirements
will be acceptable.5–10 However, if the existing crown length is insufficient, then crown length-
ening surgery should be performed first to establish adequate ferrule,11 then the teeth should
be intruded orthodontically to create the correct vertical position prior to restoration.

18
FIG 2-7 This woman was unhappy with her smile because she did not show much of her maxillary anterior teeth (a,b,c). Her
problem was caused by insufficient vertical growth of the maxilla, leaving the maxillary incisors well above the level of the lip
at rest (d). The solution to her problem required maxillary and mandibular jaw surgery to rotate these bones downward in the
front, while maintaining the posterior vertical dimension (e). The patient was pleased with the change in the vertical dimension
of her face (f,g) as well as the improvement in tooth display when smiling (h).

a b c

d e

f g h

19
2 A LTERING V ERTICAL D IMENSION IN THE P ERIO -R ESTORATIVE P ATIENT • Kokich

What happens to the alveolar bone adjacent to a tooth when the root is intruded orthodon-
tically? Although some have proposed that intruding a tooth will create new attachment,12
there is little evidence to support this theory. When teeth are intruded or extruded, the alveo-
lar bone moves with the tooth, thus maintaining the distance between the alveolar crest and
the cementoenamel junction on the tooth. In other words, the patient’s biologic width stays
about the same when the tooth is intruded or extruded.13
What happens to the gingival margin as teeth are intruded? Do the clinical crowns become
shorter as the root is pushed back into the bone, or does the gingival margin move with the
tooth? In my experience, when a tooth is intruded, the gingival margin moves about the same
amount as the tooth.14 Again, this indicates that the patient’s biologic width is maintained in
spite of extrusive or intrusive movements of the teeth. The exception to this rule has been when
I have intruded teeth with existing porcelain or gold crowns. In some of these situations, it
appears that the bone moves to match the amount of root intrusion; however, the gingival mar-
gin does not respond in the same way. In these patients, it appears that the crown is being
pushed into the gingival tissue. In the patient reported in the following case presentation, the
gingival margin moved apically as the mandibular incisors were intruded, thus maintaining the
patient’s clinical crown length.
Does an intrusive force on the roots produce or exacerbate root shortening through root
resorption? Previous research in monkeys15 shows that significant intrusive force causes exten-
sive root resorption. However, this side effect of tooth movement does not apply to all humans.
The incidence of moderate to severe root resorption in adults is about 4%.16,17 If a person is sus-
ceptible to root resorption, ie, has the genetic predisposition that causes root shortening dur-
ing orthodontics, then intrusive forces on the teeth would exacerbate that resorptive response.
However, if the patient is not susceptible to root resorption, then significant root shortening
will not occur, regardless of the amount of tooth intrusion.
Is root resorption progressive? Does it continue after orthodontics in a susceptible patient?
This question was answered in a study that evaluated root length in 100 patients who had
moderate to severe root resorption during orthodontics.18 This retrospective assessment, con-
ducted 14 years after orthodontic treatment, clearly showed that root shortening stops when
the orthodontic force is terminated, and no further root resorption occurred long-term in their
sample.

20
 C ONCLUSION

Why do the posterior teeth not extrude as the mandibular incisors are intruded? Although
it is much easier to extrude a tooth than to intrude it, the mandibular posterior teeth in an
adult are prevented from erupting by the muscles of mastication, primarily the masseter, tem-
poralis, and medial pterygoid. In an adult, it is difficult if not impossible to permanently stretch
these muscle fibers beyond their natural length. So, the patient’s vertical dimension stays the
same in spite of the extrusive force on the posterior teeth during incisor intrusion. In the
patient reported in the following case presentation, the vertical dimension did not change, and
the posterior teeth did not erupt, even though the incisors were intruded 3 mm during the
orthodontic treatment.
Is the intrusion of anterior teeth stable long-term? The answer to this question is yes, if the
teeth are stabilized or retained in the intruded position for a sufficient period of time. Experi-
mental studies in laboratory animals19,20 have shown that the principal fibers of the periodon-
tium (subcrestal collagen fibers connecting root to alveolar socket) stretch and become
obliquely oriented as a tooth is intruded or extruded. However, if the tooth is held in the
extruded or intruded position, the collagen fibers eventually reorient themselves perpendicu-
lar to the tooth root and socket wall. In animal studies19,20 this retention period was 28 days.
However, in a human it would probably take a minimum of 6 months’ stabilization to produce
a similar reorientation of the principal fibers of the human periodontium.
How is this type of tooth correction retained? After the orthodontist intrudes the teeth, the
restorative dentist should provisionalize the teeth with either bonded composite or provision-
al acrylic crowns. Then the orthodontic brackets should be replaced to maintain the intruded
tooth position for at least 6 months, preferably longer. After orthodontic bracket removal, I
recommend using a nightguard (either maxillary or mandibular) to prevent further tooth wear

C
and to maintain the vertical position of the incisors long-term.

CONCLUSION
This chapter discussed the advantages of using adjunctive orthodontics and/or orthognathic sur-
gery to assist the dentist in restoring the dentition of adult patients with deep anterior overbites,
severe wear, and/or overeruption of the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth. It is hoped that
the guidelines and discussion presented in this section will help clinical teams provide the sequence
of interdisciplinary treatment that is necessary to successfully treat these challenging situations.

21
 CASE PRESENTATION
Treating clinicians
Orthodontist: Vincent G. Kokich, DDS, MSD
Restorative dentist: Rhonda Savage, DDS

CLINICAL TREATMENT PLANNING

Age at initial presentation: 58 years [Au: Is this correct?] • Inadequate tooth display on smiling
Initial presentation: [Au: Please provide.] • No maxillary tooth display at rest
Active treatment completed: [Au: Please provide.]

TMJ and mandibular range of motion

Introduction and background • No joint sounds
• No history of locking or limited range of motion
This 58-year-old man was concerned about the appearance of • No history of muscle pain
his maxillary anterior teeth, particularly the wear of the maxil-
lary and mandibular incisors and the lack of tooth display
when smiling. He was an architect and had the financial capa-
bility to have ideal treatment. His primary goals were to pre-
Dental cast analysis
serve his teeth and improve his smile. • Angle Class II molar and canine relationships
• Excessive overbite
• Both mandibular permanent first molars missing
Medical history • Extreme wear of both maxillary and mandibular incisors
• History of protrusive bruxing habit
His medical history was noncontributory.

Intraoral findings
Diagnostic findings
• Minimal prior restoration of teeth
Extraoral and facial findings • Less-than-ideal spacing in the mandibular anterior region
• Relatively healthy gingival support
• Relatively flat facial profile • Evidence of extreme wear on the maxillary and mandibu-
• Good frontal symmetry lar incisors

22
PRETREATMENT

Lateral facial view. Frontal facial view. Frontal smile view.

Right lateral intraoral view. Frontal intraoral view. Left lateral intraoral view.

Mobilities

Probings
3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 5/2001

FACIAL FACIAL

RIGHT LEFT

LINGUAL LINGUAL
2 3 15 16
4 14
5 6 12 13
7 8 9 10 11

4 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 5/2001
Probings

Probings
3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5/2001

32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17

LINGUAL LINGUAL

RIGHT LEFT

FACIAL FACIAL

3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 4 2 4 5/2001
Probings

Mobilities

23
PRETREATMENT

Right lateral occlusion. Frontal occlusion. Left lateral occlusion.

Maxillary anterior occlusal view. Mandibular anterior occlusal view.

Summary of concerns
Radiographic findings
• Normal bone levels in anterior and posterior regions 1. How would we be able to effectively address the problem
• No evidence of decay of severe anterior tooth wear?
• Mostly small restorations previously placed in occlusal surfaces 2. How would we be able to meet this patient’s esthetic
• Extreme anterior tooth wear well into dentin enhancement expectations with the present lack of display
of the maxillary anterior teeth and uneven tooth spacing in
the mandibular anterior region?
3. How will we be able to place anterior restorations with the
Cephalometric analysis lack of tooth structure and occlusal space?
• Class I skeletal pattern
• Normal relationship between maxilla and mandible
• Normal facial proportions
• Maxillary central incisal edge 1 mm above upper lip

24
PRETREATMENT

Maxillary anterior periapical radiographs.

Right posterior bitewing radiographs. Left posterior bitewing radiographs.

Mandibular anterior periapical radiographs.

Lateral cephalometric radiograph. Lateral cephalometric tracing.

As a learning exercise, you may now outline goals/objectives of treatment and a treatment plan.

25
PROPOSED TREATMENT PLAN
Goals/objectives of treatment Phase 3: Provisionalization of
The original objectives for treating this patient were to create anterior teeth
restorative space for the dentist and to manage the posterior • Removal of orthodontic brackets
occlusion appropriately. In order to achieve these objectives, • Provisionalization of maxillary and mandibular incisors
the patient required a combination of orthodontics and with composite
restorative dentistry. The key to the treatment plan was the • Replacement of brackets to stabilize vertical correction
diagnostic waxup, which elucidated the amount of tooth of teeth
movement that would be necessary to achieve the restorative
space and confirm the conservative management of the
patient’s existing posterior occlusion.

Phase 4: Orthodontic finishing

• Establishment of alignment and occlusion with waxup
• Use of maxillary Essix retainer to retain correction and pro-
Phase 1: Planning and preparation
tect provisionals
• Meeting between orthodontist and restorative dentist to • Placement of fixed bonded mandibular lingual retainer to
establish plan maintain alignment
• Construction of diagnostic waxup to create a vision of
the result
• Patient consultations with orthodontist and restorative
dentist
Phase 5: Final restorations
• Root planing and scaling prior to orthodontics
• After 1 year, placement of porcelain veneers and crowns
on anterior teeth
• Placement of heat-processed nightguard on maxillary teeth
for wearing at night
Phase 2: Initial orthodontic therapy
• Routine periodontal maintenance every 6 months
• Bracket placement on maxillary and mandibular teeth
• Intrusion of maxillary and mandibular incisors to level the
gingival margins
• Creation of anterior space for provisionalization of the
anterior teeth

26
ACTIVE CLINICAL TREATMENT
Treatment progress The orthodontist constructed a diagnostic waxup to simu-
late the amount of tooth movement that could be achieved.
Initially, the restorative dentist and orthodontist met to discuss The restorative dentist wanted sufficient interproximal space
the combined treatment of this patient. The restorative den- between the mandibular incisors to restore these anterior teeth.
tist’s initial comment was that the vertical dimension needed to The waxup showed that the posterior occlusion could remain in
be increased in order to restore the patient’s abraded anterior an Angle Class II relationship, but the anterior relationship
teeth. However, it would have been impossible to increase the between the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth would
posterior vertical dimension with orthodontics alone, and the result in an acceptable overbite and overjet relationship. It was
patient did not need restoration of the posterior teeth. There- decided that this would be acceptable since the patient had
fore, it was decided to leave the posterior teeth in their original lived with this posterior occlusion for many years and had never
position and to intrude the maxillary and mandibular incisors experienced any temporomandibular joint symptoms.
in order to create restorative space.

Right lateral view of diagnostic waxup. Frontal view of diagnostic waxup. Left lateral view of diagnostic waxup.

The treatment began with initial root planing and scaling, tooth intrusion took about 8 months to accomplish. At that
followed by banding and bracketing of the maxillary and time, the patient had an anterior open bite. In order to estab-
mandibular teeth. Round orthodontic archwires were used lish the proper functional relationships of the maxillary and
to intrude the maxillary and mandibular incisors by placing mandibular anterior teeth during orthodontic finishing, the
stepwise bends in the archwires. The gingival margins of the orthodontist removed the incisor brackets, and the restora-
maxillary and mandibular canines were used as a guide to tive dentist provisionally restored the maxillary and mandibu-
establish the correct amount of intrusion of the incisors. The lar incisors with composite.

27
 Intrusion of mandibular incisors. Provisional restoration of mandibular incisors. Stabilization of mandibular incisors.

Intrusion of maxillary incisors. Provisional restoration of maxillary incisors. Stabilization of maxillary incisors.

After provisionalization, brackets were again placed on When the restorative dentist was satisfied with the tooth
the maxillary and mandibular incisors to stabilize the teeth in positioning, the orthodontic brackets were removed, and the
that position. A period of at least 6 months of stabilization patient’s tooth position was stabilized with a mandibular
is needed to prevent re-eruption of these teeth. Once the fixed bonded retainer and a maxillary Essix retainer to help
teeth had been stabilized, the finishing procedures in ortho- hold the vertical position of the intruded incisors and to pro-
dontics were accomplished. During that time, the diagnostic tect the composite restorations. The patient was maintained
waxup was used as a guide to determine the final occlusal with these retainers for 1 year.
positioning that was initially agreed upon by the orthodon-
tist and restorative dentist.

28
POSTTREATMENT

Right lateral intraoral view. Frontal intraoral view. Left lateral intraoral view.

Mobilities
3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 4/2005
Probings
3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 5/2001

FACIAL FACIAL

RIGHT LEFT

LINGUAL LINGUAL
2 3 15 16
4 14
5 6 12 13
7 8 9 10 11

4 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 5/2001
Probings
3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 4/2005

3 2 4 4 2 3 4 2 3 3 2 3 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 4/2005
Probings
3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5/2001

32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17

LINGUAL LINGUAL

RIGHT LEFT

FACIAL FACIAL

3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 4 2 4 5/2001
Probings
3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 4 2 4 4/2005
Mobilities

29
POSTTREATMENT

Lateral cephalometric radiograph. Cephalometric superimposition of dental changes.

Maxillary anterior periapical radiographs. Mandibular anterior periapical radiographs.

After 1 year of orthodontic retention, the dentist placed The final anterior periapical radiographs and intraoral photo-
porcelain veneers on the previously abraded maxillary and graphs show that as the teeth were intruded, the gingiva and
mandibular incisors as well as on the canines. Then the bone moved apically with the teeth. The final cephalometric
restorative dentist constructed a maxillary nightguard made radiographs and superimposition show that the patient now
from heat-processed acrylic to prevent further wear and abra- has the maxillary incisal edge slightly below the level of the
sion and to hold the orthodontic correction of the teeth. upper lip at rest and the smile esthetics have been improved.
Orthodontic tooth intrusion of severely abraded maxillary
and mandibular incisors is a viable, realistic, and appropri-
ate method for repositioning the maxillary and mandibular
Commentary
incisors into their original position, so they can be restored
The combination of orthodontics and restorative dentistry in more conservatively by the restorative dentist. This is a per-
the management of this patient was indispensable. The ortho- fect example of the value of interdisciplinary treatment in a
dontic intrusion permitted space for restoration of the abrad- challenging adult restorative case.
ed incisal edges without significant further incisal preparation.

30
POSTTREATMENT

Maxillary anterior intraoral view.

Mandibular anterior intraoral view.

Frontal view of smile.

31
 R
2 A LTERING V ERTICAL D IMENSION IN THE P ERIO -R ESTORATIVE P ATIENT • Kokich

REFERENCES
1. De Mol van Otterloo JJ, Tuinzing DB, Kostense P. Inferior positioning of the maxilla by a Le Fort I osteotomy:
A review of 25 patients with vertical maxillary deficiency. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1996;24:69–77.
2. Major PW, Phillippson GE, Glover KE, Grace MG. Stability of maxilla downgrafting after rigid or wire fixation.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:1287–1291.
3. Costa F, Robiony M, Zerman N, Zorzan E, Politi M. Bone biological plate for stabilization of maxillary inferior
repositioning. Minerva Stomatol 2005;54:227–236.
4. Spear F, Kokich VG, Mathews D. Interdisciplinary management of anterior dental esthetics. J Am Dent Assoc
2006;137:160–169.
5. Kokich VG. Esthetics: The ortho-perio-restorative connection. Semin Orthod 1996;2:21–30.
6. Kokich VG, Kokich VO. Orthodontic therapy for the periodontal-restorative patient. In: Rose L, Mealey B, Genco R,
Cohen D (eds). Periodontics: Medicine, Surgery, and Implants. St Louis: Mosby, 2004:718–744.
7. Kokich VG. Anterior dental esthetics: An orthodontic perspective. I: Crown length. J Esthet Dent 1993;5:19–23.
8. Kokich VG. Esthetics and vertical tooth position: The orthodontic possibilities. Compend Contin Educ Dent
1997;18:1225–1231.
9. Kokich VG. Managing orthodontic–restorative treatment for the adolescent patient. In: McNamara JA (ed).
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Ann Arbor: Needham, 2001:395–422.
10. Kokich VG, Kokich VO. Interrelationship of orthodontics with periodontics and restorative dentistry. In: Nanda R
(ed). Biomechanics and Esthetic Strategies in Clinical Orthodontics. St Louis: Elsevier, 2005:348–373.
11. Kokich V, Spear F, Mathews D. Inheriting the unhappy patient: An interdisciplinary case report. Adv Esthet
Interdiscip Dent 2005;1:12–22.
12. Melsen B, Agerbaeck N, Markenstam G. Intrusion of incisors in adult patients with marginal bone loss. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:232–241.
13. Kokich VG, Spear FM, Kokich VO. Maximizing anterior esthetics: An interdisciplinary approach. In: McNama-
ra JA (ed). Frontiers in Dental and Facial Esthetics. Ann Arbor: Needham, 2001:1–18.
14. Kokich VG, Spear F. Guidelines for treating the orthodontic-restorative patient. Semin Orthod 1997;3:3–20.
15. Dellinger EL. A histologic and cephalometric investigation of premolar intrusion in the Macaca speciosa monkey.
Am J Orthod 1967;53:325–355.
16. Mirabella AD, Artun J. Prevalence and severity of apical root resorption of maxillary anterior teeth in adult
orthodontic patients. Eur J Orthod 1995;17:93–99.
17. Mirabella AD, Artun J. Risk factors for apical root resorption of maxillary anterior teeth in adult orthodontic
patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:48–55.
18. Remington DN, Joondeph DR, Artun J, Riedel RA, Chapko MK. Long-term evaluation of root resorption occur-
ring during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:43–46.
19. Reitan K. Clinical and histologic observations on tooth movement during and after orthodontic treatment. Am
J Orthod 1967;53:721–745.
20. Reitan K. Principles of retention and avoidance of posttreatment relapse. Am J Orthod 1969;55:776–790.

32