Insurance Code Rev
Insurance Code Rev
Insurance Code Rev
(The Insurance Code of the Philippines Annotated Hector de Leon, 2002 ed.)
2. Voluntary – the parties may incorporate such terms and conditions as they may deem
convenient.
4. Unilateral – imposes legal duties only on the insurer who promises to indemnify in case of
loss.
5. Conditional – It is subject to conditions the principal one of which is the happening of the
event insured against.
7. Personal – each party having in view the character, credit and conduct of the other
1. Insurable Interest
2. Principle of Utmost Good Faith
An insurance contract requires utmost good faith (uberrimae fidei) between the parties. The
applicant is enjoined to disclose any material fact, which he knows or ought to know.
Reason:
An insurance contract is an aleatory contract. The insurer relies on the representation of the
applicant, who is in the best position to know the state of his health.
3. Contract of Indemnity
It is the basis of all property insurance. The insured who has insurable interest over a
property is only entitled to recover the amount of actual loss sustained and the burden is
upon him to establish the amount of such loss
Rules:
a. Applies only to property insurance except when the creditor insures the life of his
debtor.
b. Life insurance is not a contract of indemnity.
c. Insurance contracts are not wagering contracts. (Sec. 4)
Most of the terms of the contract do not result from mutual negotiations between the
parties as they are prescribed by the insurer in final printed form to which the insured may
“adhere” if he chooses but which he cannot change. (Rizal Surety and Insurance Co., vs. CA,
336 SCRA 12)
5. Principle of Subrogation
It is a process of legal substitution where the insurer steps into the shoes of the insured and
he avails of the latter’s rights against the wrongdoer at the time of loss.
Purposes: (The Insurance Code of the Philippines Annotated, Hector de Leon, 2002 ed.)
1. To make the person who caused the loss legally responsible for it.
2. To prevent the insured from receiving a double recovery from the wrongdoer and
the insurer.
3. To prevent tortfeasors from being free from liabilities and is thus founded on
considerations of public policy.
Rules:
2. The insurer can only recover from the third person what the insured could have
recovered.
a. Where the insured by his own act releases the wrongdoer or third party liable
for the loss or damage;
b. Where the insurer pays the insured the value of the loss without notifying the
carrier who has in good faith settled the insured’s claim for loss;
c. Where the insurer pays the insured for a loss or risk not covered by the policy.
(Pan Malayan Insurance Company v. CA, 184 SCRA 54)
d. In life insurance.
The ambiguous terms are to be construed strictly against the insurer, and liberally in favor
of the insured. However, if the terms are clear, there is no room for interpretation. (Calanoc
vs. Court of Appeals, 98 Phil. 79)
2. The insured is subject to a risk of loss through the destruction or impairment of that
interest by the happening of designated perils;
4. Such assumption is part of a general scheme to distribute actual losses among a large
group or substantial number of persons bearing somewhat similar risks; and
(The Insurance Code of the Philippines Annotated, Hector de Leon, 2002 ed.)
What is being followed in insurance contracts is what is known as the “cognition theory”.
Thus, “an acceptance made by letter shall not bind the person making the offer except from
the time it came to his knowledge”. (Enriquez vs. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada, 41 Phil.
269)
Binding Receipt
A concise and temporary written contract issued to the insurer through its duly authorized
agent embodying the principal terms of an expected policy of insurance.
Purpose:
It is intended to give temporary insurance protection coverage to the applicant pending the
acceptance or rejection of his application.
Duration:
Not exceeding 60 days unless a longer period is approved by Insurance Commissioner (Sec.
52).
Riders
Printed stipulations usually attached to the policy because they constitute additional
stipulations between the parties. (Ang Giok Chip vs. Springfield, 56 Phil. 275)
In case of conflict between a rider and the printed stipulations in the policy, the rider
prevails, as being a more deliberate expression of the agreement of the contracting parties.
(C. Alvendia, The Law of Insurance inthe Philippines, 1968 ed.)
Clauses
An agreement between the insurer and the insured on certain matter relating to the
liability of the insurer in case of loss. (Prof. De Leon, p.188)
Endorsements
Any provision added to the contract altering its scope or application. (Prof. De Leon,
p.188)
POLICY OF INSURANCE
The written instrument in which a contract of insurance is set forth. (Sec. 49)
1. Parties
3. Rate of premium;
The insurance proceeds shall be applied exclusively to the proper interest of the person in
whose name or to whose benefit it is made, unless otherwise specified in the policy.
Kinds:
1. OPEN POLICY – value of thing insured is not agreed upon, but left to be ascertained in
case of loss. (Sec.60)
The actual loss, as determined, will represent the total indemnity due the insured from the
insurer except only that the total indemnity shall not exceed the face value of the policy.
(Development Insurance Corp. vs. IAC, 143 SCRA 62)
2. VALUED POLICY – definite valuation of the property insured is agreed by both parties, and
written on the face of policy. (Sec. 61)
In the absence of fraud or mistake, the agreed valuation will be paid in case of total loss of
the property, unless the insurance is for a lower amount.
3. RUNNING POLICY – contemplates successive insurances and which provides that the
object of the policy may from time to time be defined (Sec. 62)
1. Life insurance
2. Non-life insurance
Note:
1. Health and accident insurance are either covered under life (Sec. 180) or casualty
insurance. (Sec. 174).
2. Marine, fire, and the property aspect of casualty insurance are also referred to
as property insurance.
2. Insured - The party to be indemnified upon the occurrence of the loss. He must have
capacity to contract, must possess an insurable interest in the subject of the insurance and
must not be a public enemy.
A public enemy - a nation with who the Philippines is at war and it includes every
citizen or subject of such nation.
i. A person who insures his own life can designate any person as his beneficiary, whether or
not the beneficiary has an insurable interest in the life of the insured subject to the
limitations under Art.739 and Art. 2012 of the NCC.
Reason: In essence, a life insurance policy is no different form a civil donation insofar as the
beneficiary is concerned. Both are founded on the same consideration of liberality. (Insular
Life vs. Ebrado, 80 SCRA 181)
ii. A person who insures the life of another person and name himself as the beneficiary must
have an insurable interest in such life. (Sec. 10)
iii. As a general rule, the designation of a beneficiary is revocable unless the insured
expressly waived the right to revoke in the policy. (Sec. 11)
iv. The interest of a beneficiary in a life insurance policy shall be forfeited when the
beneficiary is the principal accomplice or accessory in willfully bringing about the death of
the insured in which event, the nearest relative of the insured shall receive the proceeds of
said insurance if not otherwise disqualified.(Sec. 12)
b. PROPERTY
Insured cannot:
The insured does not even retain the power to destroy the contract by refusing to pay the
premiums for the beneficiary can protect his interest by paying such premiums for he has
an interest in the fulfillment of the obligation. (Vance, p. 665, cited in de Leon, p. 101, 2002
ed.)
A. In General
A person has an insurable interest in the subject matter if he is so connected, so situated, so
circumstanced, so related, that by the preservation of the same he shall derive pecuniary
benefit, and by its destruction he shall suffer pecuniary loss, damage or prejudice.
B. Life
c. of any person under a legal obligation to him to pay money or respecting property or
services, of which death or illness might delay or prevent performance; and
d. of any person upon whose life any estate or interest vested in him depends. (Sec. 10)
When it should exist: When the insurance takes effect; not thereafter or when the loss
occurs.
Amount: The measure of insurable interest in property is the extent to which the insured
might be dignified by loss or injury thereof.
1. Must exist only at the time the policy takes effect and need not exist at the time of
loss
2. Unlimited except in life insurance effected by creditor on life of debtor.
3. The expectation of benefit to be derived from the continuedexistence of life need no
t have any legal basis whatever. A reasonable probability is sufficient without more.
4. The beneficiary need not have an insurable interest over the life of the insured if the
insured himself secured the policy. However, if the life insurance was obtained by
the beneficiary, the latter must have insurable interest over the life of the insured.
1. The beneficiary must have insurable interest over the thing insured
2. Limited to actual value of interest in property insured.
3. An expectation of a benefit to be derived from the continued existence of the
property insured must have a legal basis.
4. Must exist at the time the policy takes effect and when the loss occurs
SPECIAL CASES
A carrier or depository of any kind has an insurable interest in a thing held by him as such,
to the extent of his liability but not to exceed the value thereof (Sec. 15)
The mortgagor and mortgagee each have an insurable interest in the property mortgaged
and this interest is separate and distinct from the other.
a. Mortgagor – As owner, has an insurable interest therein to the extent of its value, even
though the mortgage debt equals such value. The reason is that the loss or destruction of
the property insured will not extinguish the mortgage debt.
b. Mortgagee – His interest is only up to the extent of the debt. Such interest continues until
the mortgage debt is extinguished.
The lessor cannot be validly a beneficiary of a fire insurance policy taken by a lessee over his
merchandise, and the provision in the lease contract providing for such automatic
assignment is void for being contrary to law and public policy. (Cha vs. Court of Appeals, 227
SCRA 690
Subsequent acts of the mortgagor cannot affect the rights of the assignee
Acts of the mortgagor affect the mortgagee. Reason: Mortgagor does not cease to be a
party to the contract. (Secs. 8 and 9)
a. The contract is deemed to be upon the interest of the mortgagor; hence, he does not
cease to be a party to the contract.
b. Any act of the mortgagor prior to the loss, which would otherwise avoid the insurance
affects the mortgagee even if the property is in the hands of the mortgagee.
c. Any act, which under the contract of insurance is to be performed by the mortgagor, may
be performed by the mortgagee with the same effect.
d. In case of loss, the mortgagee is entitled to the proceeds to the extent of his credit.
e. Upon recovery by the mortgagee to the extent of his credit, the debt is extinguished.
In case a mortgagee insures his own interest and a loss occurs, he is entitled to the
proceeds of the insurance but he is not allowed to retain his claim against the mortgagor as
the claim is discharged but it passes by subrogation to the insurer to the extent of the
money paid by such insurer. (Palileo vs. Cosio)
VIII. RISK
1. Future contingent event resulting in loss or damage – Ex. Possible future fire
2. Past unknown event resulting in loss or damage – Ex. Fact of past sinking of a vessel
unknown to theparties3.Contingent liability – Ex. Reinsurance
Consideration paid an insurer for undertaking to indemnify the insured against a specified
peril.
GENERAL RULE:
No policy issued by an insurance company is valid and binding until actual payment of
premium. Any agreement to the contrary is void. (Sec. 77)
EXCEPTIONS:
1. In case of life or industrial life insurance, when the grace periods applies; (Sec. 77)
2. When the insurer makes a written acknowledgment of the receipt premium; (Sec.
78)
3. Section 77 may not apply if the parties have agreed to the payment of the premium
in installments and partial payment has been made at the time of the loss. (Makati
Tuscany Condominium Corp. v. CA, 215SCRA 462)
4. Where a credit term has been agreed upon. (UCPB vs. Masagana Telemart, 308 SCRA
259)
5. Where the parties are barred by estoppel. (UCPB vs. Maagana Telemart, 356 SCRA
307)
Section 77 merely precludes the parties from stipulating that the policy is valid even if the
premiums are not paid. (Makati Tuscany Condominium Corp. v. CA, 215 SCRA 462)
Conclusive evidence of its payment, so far as to make the policy binding, notwithstanding
any stipulation therein that it shall not be binding until the premium is actually paid. (Sec.
78)
A. Whole:
1. If the thing insured was never exposed to the risks insured against; (Sec. 79)
3. If contract is voidable because of the existence of facts of which the insured was ignorant
without his fault; (Sec. 81)
4. When by any default of the insured other than actual fraud, the insurer never incurred
liability; (Sec. 81)
5. When rescission is granted due to the insurer’s breach of contract. (Sec. 74)
B. Pro rata:
1.When the insurance is for a definite period and the insured surrenders his policy before th
e termination thereof;
Exceptions:
1. When the risk has already attached and the risk is entire and indivisible.
2. In life insurance.
3. When the contract is rescindable or rendered void ab initio by the fraud of the insured.
4. When the contract is illegal and the parties are in pari delicto
PREMIUM VS.
ASSESSMENT
X. TRANSFER OF POLICY
1. Life Insurance
It can be transferred even without the consent of the insurer except when there is
a stipulation requiring the consent of the insurer before transfer. (Sec. 181)
Reason: The policy does not represent a personal agreement between the insured and
the insurer.
2. Property insurance
Reason: The insurer approved the policy based on the personal qualification and the
insurable interest of the insured.
3. Casualty insurance
It cannot be transferred without the consent of the insurer. (Paterson cited in de Leon p. 82)
The mere (absolute) transfer of the thing insured does not transfer the policy, but suspends
it until the same person becomes the owner of both the policy and the thing insured. (Sec.
58)
EXCEPTIONS:
2. Change in interest in the thing insured after occurrence of an injury which results in a
loss.(Sec. 21);
4. Change of interest, by will or succession, on the death of the insured. (Sec. 23);
5. Transfer of interest by one of several partners, joint owners, or owners in common, who
are jointly insured, to others. (Sec. 24);
6. When a policy is so framed that it will inure to the benefit of whomsoever, during the
continuance of the risk, may become the owner of the interest insured. (Sec. 57);
7. When there is an express prohibition against alienation in the policy, in case of alienation,
the contract of insurance is not merely suspended but avoided. (Art. 1306, NCC).
XI. ASCERTAINMENT AND CONTROL OF RISK AND LOSSA. Four Primary Concerns of the
Parties: